1
|
Liu K, Lv L, Li W, Ren Z, Wang P, Liu X, Gao W, Sun L, Zhang G. A comprehensive review on food waste anaerobic co-digestion: Research progress and tendencies. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2023; 878:163155. [PMID: 37001653 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Food waste (FW) anaerobic digestion systems are prone to imbalance during long-term operation, and the imbalance mechanism is complex. Anaerobic co-digestion (AcoD) of FW and other substrates can overcome the performance limitations of single digestion, allowing for the mutual use of multiple wastes and resource recovery. Research on the AcoD of FW has been widely conducted and successfully applied to a practical engineering scale. Therefore, this review describes the research progress of AcoD of FW with other substrates. By analyzing the problems and challenges faced by AcoD of FW, the synergistic effects and influencing factors of different biomass wastes are discussed, and improvement strategies to improve the performance of AcoD of FW are summarized from different reaction stages of anaerobic digestion. By combing the research progress of AcoD of FW, it provides a reference for the optimization and improvement of the performance of the co-digestion system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaili Liu
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Clean Energy and Pollution Control, School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, PR China
| | - Longyi Lv
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Clean Energy and Pollution Control, School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, PR China.
| | - Weiguang Li
- State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology (SKLUWRE, HIT), Harbin 150090, PR China
| | - Zhijun Ren
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Clean Energy and Pollution Control, School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, PR China
| | - Pengfei Wang
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Clean Energy and Pollution Control, School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, PR China
| | - Xiaoyang Liu
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Clean Energy and Pollution Control, School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, PR China
| | - Wenfang Gao
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Clean Energy and Pollution Control, School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, PR China
| | - Li Sun
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Clean Energy and Pollution Control, School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, PR China
| | - Guangming Zhang
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Clean Energy and Pollution Control, School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Farghali M, Mohamed IMA, Osman AI, Rooney DW. Seaweed for climate mitigation, wastewater treatment, bioenergy, bioplastic, biochar, food, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics: a review. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS 2023; 21:97-152. [PMID: 36245550 PMCID: PMC9547092 DOI: 10.1007/s10311-022-01520-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
The development and recycling of biomass production can partly solve issues of energy, climate change, population growth, food and feed shortages, and environmental pollution. For instance, the use of seaweeds as feedstocks can reduce our reliance on fossil fuel resources, ensure the synthesis of cost-effective and eco-friendly products and biofuels, and develop sustainable biorefinery processes. Nonetheless, seaweeds use in several biorefineries is still in the infancy stage compared to terrestrial plants-based lignocellulosic biomass. Therefore, here we review seaweed biorefineries with focus on seaweed production, economical benefits, and seaweed use as feedstock for anaerobic digestion, biochar, bioplastics, crop health, food, livestock feed, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics. Globally, seaweeds could sequester between 61 and 268 megatonnes of carbon per year, with an average of 173 megatonnes. Nearly 90% of carbon is sequestered by exporting biomass to deep water, while the remaining 10% is buried in coastal sediments. 500 gigatonnes of seaweeds could replace nearly 40% of the current soy protein production. Seaweeds contain valuable bioactive molecules that could be applied as antimicrobial, antioxidant, antiviral, antifungal, anticancer, contraceptive, anti-inflammatory, anti-coagulants, and in other cosmetics and skincare products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Farghali
- Graduate School of Animal and Food Hygiene, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080-8555 Japan
- Department of Animal and Poultry Hygiene and Environmental Sanitation, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 71526 Egypt
| | - Israa M. A. Mohamed
- Department of Animal and Poultry Hygiene and Environmental Sanitation, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 71526 Egypt
- Graduate School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences and Agriculture, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, 2-11 Inada, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080-8555 Japan
| | - Ahmed I. Osman
- School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, David Keir Building, Queen’s University Belfast, Stranmillis Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland BT9 5AG UK
| | - David W. Rooney
- School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, David Keir Building, Queen’s University Belfast, Stranmillis Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland BT9 5AG UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kunatsa T, Xia X. A review on anaerobic digestion with focus on the role of biomass co-digestion, modelling and optimisation on biogas production and enhancement. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY 2022; 344:126311. [PMID: 34780910 DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2021] [Revised: 10/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The status, recent trends and future perspectives in modelling and optimisation of anaerobic co-digestion is investigated. Areas that can be focused on and those which need further research towards enhancing biogas production are pointed out. Co-digestion, modelling and optimisation of anaerobic digestion as well as techno-economic aspects are reviewed in this paper. It was noted that co-digestion requires more research into a variety of bio-resources and their specific blend proportions. Modelling and optimisation of co-digestion with substrate seasonal fluctuations has not been addressed in previous studies. Controlling key process factors including temperature, pH, and carbon to nitrogen ratio is critical in improving biogas yield. Biogas hybridisation is yet to be explored in depth. The majority of researches are focused on mono-digestion, feedstock co-digestion, modelling, and optimisation of anaerobic digestion needs significant further investigations. A multi-objective approach taking all technical and economic parameters in the modelling and optimization is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tawanda Kunatsa
- Center of New Energy Systems, Department of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa; Department of Fuels and Energy, Chinhoyi University of Technology, Zimbabwe.
| | - Xiaohua Xia
- Center of New Energy Systems, Department of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yu D, Zhang J, Chulu B, Yang M, Nopens I, Wei Y. Ammonia stress decreased biomarker genes of acetoclastic methanogenesis and second peak of production rates during anaerobic digestion of swine manure. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY 2020; 317:124012. [PMID: 32822891 DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Revised: 08/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Research shows that anaerobic digestion could acclimate to ammonia stress; however, the acclimation remained unaddressed. In this study, evolution of microbial community, functional gene, and pathway was linked with apparent kinetic and performance in unacclimated inoculum under ammonia stress, to deepen understanding of the acclimation. The second peak in production rate demonstrated crucial kinetic changes under ammonia stress. The methane loss was mainly protein in residual COD. Metagenomic showed initial inhibition in all methane metabolism pathways under ammonia stress, and recovery in acetate uptake was the key to ammonia acclimation. The acclimation was found in alternative pathway of Acetyl-CoA (CH3CO-S-CoA) synthesis from acetate, accompanying by syntrophic methanogenesis. Ammonia inhibited acetoclastic methanogenesis by competing CH3-CO-Pi with pta and formed speculative sediment CH3-CO-PO4[NH4]2. Biomarker of methanogenesis kinetic was suggested as mcr, hdr, and mch. The biomarker could indicate acclimation stages to ammonia, empowering anaerobic digestion by early warning of methane loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawei Yu
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Department of Water Pollution Control Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; BIOMATH, Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Gent B-9000, Belgium
| | - Junya Zhang
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Department of Water Pollution Control Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Buhe Chulu
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Department of Water Pollution Control Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Min Yang
- BIOMATH, Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Gent B-9000, Belgium
| | - Ingmar Nopens
- BIOMATH, Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Gent B-9000, Belgium
| | - Yuansong Wei
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Department of Water Pollution Control Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ma G, Ndegwa P, Harrison JH, Chen Y. Methane yields during anaerobic co-digestion of animal manure with other feedstocks: A meta-analysis. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2020; 728:138224. [PMID: 32361106 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Anaerobic co-digestion of animal manure with other feedstocks (aka co-digestion) is increasingly being used to enhance methane yield and organic waste management. The benefits accruing from co-digestions compared to mono-digestions, however, vary greatly in the literature. The goal of this research was to use meta-analysis to critically compare methane yields between mono- and co-digestions and identify relevant factors (co-substrate type, substrate dose, carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratio, volatile solids (VS), substrate pH, organic loading rate (OLR), and hydraulic retention time (HRT)) contributing to methane yield. Published studies (n = 64 representing 384 case-studies) with sufficient detail on methane yield were identified for the meta-analysis. Analysis indicated that co-digestion of animal manure with other feedstocks significantly increased methane yield (249 L kg-1[VS]), compared with anaerobic mono-digestion of animal manure (171 L kg-1[VS]). Similar methane yields increases (47-57 L kg-1[VS]) were obtained from co-digestions in batch reactors of swine (238-287 L kg-1[VS]), poultry (213-260 L kg-1[VS]), and cattle manure (147-204 L kg-1[VS]). In continuous digesters of cattle manure (175-299 L kg-1[VS]) co-digestion had the greatest methane yield improvement of 124 L kg-1[VS], swine manure (212-322 L kg-1[VS]) co-digestion ranked second with 110 L kg-1[VS], and poultry manure ranked third with 70 L kg-1[VS]. Improved methane yield were obtained at optimum C/N ratio ranging from 26 to 34. The respective optimum OLR for co-digestion of swine, poultry, and cattle manure were 1.2, 1.4 and 3.4 kg VS m-3 d-1, while the recommended HRT was 30-40 d. Taken together, anaerobic co-digestion of animal manure with other feedstock significantly improved anaerobic digestion. Factors contributing to methane yields included: substrate-type and dose, VS, C/N, OLR, and HRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guiling Ma
- Department of Animal Sciences, WSU-Pullman, 116 ASLB, Pullman, WA 99164, USA
| | - Pius Ndegwa
- Department of Biological Systems Engineering, WSU-Pullman, PO Box 646120, Pullman, WA 99164-6120, USA
| | - Joseph H Harrison
- Department of Animal Sciences, WSU-Puyallup, 2606 W Pioneer, Puyallup, WA 98371, USA.
| | - Yanting Chen
- Department of Animal Sciences, WSU-Pullman, 116 ASLB, Pullman, WA 99164, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Khoshnevisan B, Dodds M, Tsapekos P, Torresi E, Smets BF, Angelidaki I, Zhang Y, Valverde-Pérez B. Coupling electrochemical ammonia extraction and cultivation of methane oxidizing bacteria for production of microbial protein. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2020; 265:110560. [PMID: 32421560 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Revised: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Conventional treatment of residual resources relies on nutrient removal to limit pollution. Recently, nutrient recovery technologies have been proposed as more environmentally and energetically efficient strategies. Nevertheless, the upcycling of recovered resources is typically limited by their quality or purity. Specifically, nitrogen extracted from residual streams, such as anaerobic digestion (AD) effluents and wastewaters, could support microbial protein production. In this context, this study was performed as a proof-of-concept to combine nitrogen recovery via electrochemical reactors with the production of high quality microbial protein via cultivation of methanotrophs. Two types of AD effluents, i.e., cattle manure and organic fraction of municipal solid waste, and urine were tested to investigate the nitrogen extraction efficiency. The results showed that 31-51% of the nitrogen could be recovered free of trace chemicals from residual streams depending on the substrate and voltage used. Based on the results achieved, higher nitrogen concentration in the residual streams resulted in higher nitrogen flux between anodic and cathodic chambers. Results showed that the extraction process has an energy demand of 9.97 (±0.7) - 14.44 (±1.19) kWh/kg-N, depending on the substrate and operating conditions. Furthermore, a mixed-culture of methanotrophic bacteria could grow well with the extracted nitrogen producing a total dry weight of 0.49 ± 0.01 g/L. Produced biomass contained a wide range of essential amino acids making it comparable with conventional protein sources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benyamin Khoshnevisan
- Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark; Key Laboratory of Non-point Source Pollution Control, Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Mark Dodds
- Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Panagiotis Tsapekos
- Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Elena Torresi
- Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark; Veolia Water Technologies AB, AnoxKaldnes, Klosterängsvägen 11A, SE-226 47, Lund, Sweden
| | - Barth F Smets
- Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Irini Angelidaki
- Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Yifeng Zhang
- Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Borja Valverde-Pérez
- Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Baltrėnas P, Kolodynskij V. Experimental research of efficiency of semi-continuous and periodic biogas production processes by using chicken manure bioloadings. WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH : A RESEARCH PUBLICATION OF THE WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION 2020; 92:722-730. [PMID: 31665805 DOI: 10.1002/wer.1266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Revised: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/24/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Semi-continuous and periodic biogas production processes were investigated. Dry chicken manure containing 40.0 ± 0.5% volatile solids (VS) was used for the production of bioloading. Semi-continuous operation bioreactor and periodic bioreactor were used to implement research. Bioloading was additionally supplemented with newly prepared parts by removing 10% of decomposed mass and by adding the same amount of preheated mass every 7 days (semi-continuous process). The process was periodic when the mass was completely decomposed (after 45 days of the experiment) and fully removed (bioreactor was loaded with a new portion of raw material to 100% of the working volume again). Total duration of both experiments was 90 days. The results show that biogas production by semi-continuous process is more effective than periodic process due to higher total biogas yield (up to 39.7%) and higher methane yield (up to 33.5%). The maximum concentration of CH4 was determined during the periodic biogas production process, but the difference was only up to 2.1% (68.9% and 66.8%, respectively). Since the produced biogas had quite high average CO2 and H2 S concentrations (<40.0% and 2.1 g/m3 , respectively), it is recommended to use filter-adsorbers or biofilters. According to the results, semi-continuous type bioreactor is more effective than periodic. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Maximum CH4 concentration in biogas, produced during periodic process, is 2.1% higher than during the semi-continuous process. Average CH4 concentration in biogas, produced during periodic and semi-continuous process, reaches 52.7% and 53.0%, respectively. Biogas and methane yield (during periodic process) is 39.7% and 33.5% lower than during the semi-continuous process. CH4 concentration decreases (after supplement) about 6.0%-7.0% (during the semi-continuous process), but increases to the next cyclic bioloading supplement. Semi-continuous biogas production process is more efficient than periodic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pranas Baltrėnas
- Research Institute of Environmental Protection, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Vitalij Kolodynskij
- Research Institute of Environmental Protection, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|