Maintaining education and professional development for anaesthesia trainees during the COVID-19 pandemic: the Self-isolAting Virtual Education (SAVEd) project

Retailoring training programmes in anaesthesia and intensive care after the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we want to collect all the adaptations that anaesthesiology training has faced because of the health crisis and social distancing measures resulting from coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19). We reviewed new teaching tools launched during the COVID-19 outbreak worldwide and particularly those implemented by the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) and the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (EACTAIC).

RECENT FINDINGS

Globally, COVID-19 has interrupted health services and all aspects of training programmes. These unprecedented changes have led to teaching and trainee support innovation tools, focusing on online learning and simulation programmes. Airway management, critical care and regional anaesthesia, have been enhanced during the pandemic, while there were major obstacles in paediatrics, obstetrics and pain medicine.

SUMMARY

The COVID-19 pandemic has altered profoundly the functioning of health systems worldwide. Anaesthesiologists and trainees have fought on the front lines of the battle against COVID-19. As a result, training in anaesthesiology during the last 2 years has focused on managing patients in intensive care. New training programmes have been designed to continue teaching residents of this speciality, focusing on e-learning and advanced simulation. It is necessary to present a review describing the impact that this turbulent period has had on the different subsections of anaesthesiology and to review the innovative measures that have been implemented to address these possible deficits in education and training.

Is Virtual Learning Here to Stay? A Multispecialty Survey of Residents, Fellows, and Faculty

The transition to virtual learning during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic marks a paradigm shift in graduate medical education (GME). From June to September 2021, we conducted a dual-center, multispecialty survey of residents, fellows, and faculty members to determine overall perceptions about virtual learning and assess its benefits, drawbacks, and future role in GME. We discovered a mainly positive view of virtual education among trainees (138/207, 0.67, 95% CI 0.59-0.73) and faculty (180/278, 0.65, 0.59-0.70). Large group sessions, such as didactic lectures, grand rounds, and national conferences, were ranked best-suited for the virtual environment, whereas small groups and procedural training were the lowest ranked. Major benefits and drawbacks to virtual learning was identified. A hybrid approach, combining in-person and virtual sessions, was the preferred format among trainees (167/207, 0.81, 0.75-0.86) and faculty (229/278, 0.82, 0.77-0.87). Virtual learning offers a valuable educational experience that should be retained in postpandemic GME curriculums.

The Impact of COVID-19 on the Training of Anesthesiologists in Hong Kong: Overcoming the Challenge

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on the training of anesthesiologists in Hong Kong.

Introduction

COVID-19 has caused a substantial impact on anesthesiology training in multiple domains. The challenges faced by both trainees and educators remain a significant concern and adaptations in clinical teaching are warranted. We conducted this study to quantify the impact and identify learning areas in recurring pandemics.

Methods

Electronic surveys were distributed to anesthesiology trainees and fellows in Hospital Authority in Hong Kong. Data from respondents were collated and analyzed. Reliability analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were performed.

Results

A total of 97 responses were collected and analyzed. Majority (59% of trainees and 79% of fellows) agreed that the COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted anesthesia training overall. Bag-mask ventilation and direct laryngoscopy were the 2 most affected areas in airway training; 47% of fellows observed a technical skill decline among trainees. Most respondents (64% of trainees and 71% of fellows) agreed that simulation sessions could help with residents' training. Exploratory factor analysis indicated the following subscales: loss of educational opportunities, loss of caseload and formal training, loss of technical skills (regional and procedural), loss of technical skills (airway management), the hampering of ICU rotations, and difficulty teaching residents.

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused disruptions in caseload, technical skills training, work-based assessment, and continued medical education, hampering both trainees' and fellows' education. Measures to counter the effect of the pandemic were discussed. Our findings will help educators better understand the challenges, marshal resources, and plan to enhance trainees' educational experience.

Educational Approaches That Enhance Online Clinical Clerkship during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Objective This cross-sectional national study determined which educational approaches are associated with the effectiveness of online clerkship for medical students. Method A survey was conducted for medical students at 78 medical schools in Japan from May 29 to June 14, 2020. It comprised the following aspects: (a) participants' profiles, (b) number of opportunities to learn from each educational approach (lecture, medical quiz, assignment, oral presentation, observation of a physician's practice, clinical skill practice, participation in interprofessional meetings, and interactive discussions with physicians) in online clerkship, (c) frequency of technical problems, and (d) educational outcome measurement (satisfaction, motivation, knowledge acquisition, skill acquisition, change in self-study time, and understanding of the importance of medical care team). Results Of the 2,640 respondents, 2,594 (98.3%) agreed to cooperate. Ultimately, 1,711 matched our inclusion criteria. All educational approaches but assignments were positively associated with satisfaction and motivation. All educational approaches excluding assignment submission and interprofessional meeting were positively associated with knowledge acquisition. Observation, practice, and interprofessional meeting were positively associated with skill acquisition. Only assignment submission was positively associated with the change in self-study time. Educational approaches excluding medical quizzes were positively associated with understanding the importance of the medical care team. Technical problems were negatively associated with motivation, knowledge acquisition, and skill acquisition. Conclusions Educators should implement various educational approaches, especially observation and practice, even in online clinical clerkship. They also need to minimize the technical problems associated with the Internet, as they reduce the effectiveness of online clerkship.

Remote learning developments in postgraduate medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic - A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 71

BACKGROUND

Prior reviews investigated medical education developments in response to COVID-19, identifying the pivot to remote learning as a key area for future investigation. This review synthesized online learning developments aimed at replacing previously face-to-face 'classroom' activities for postgraduate learners.

METHODS

Four online databases (CINAHL, Embase, PsychINFO, and PubMed) and MedEdPublish were searched through 21 December 2020. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts, performed data extraction, and assessed risk of bias. The PICRAT technology integration framework was applied to examine how teachers integrated and learners engaged with technology. A descriptive synthesis and outcomes were reported. A thematic analysis explored limitations and lessons learned.

RESULTS

Fifty-one publications were included. Fifteen collaborations were featured, including international partnerships and national networks of program directors. Thirty-nine developments described pivots of existing educational offerings online and twelve described new developments. Most interventions included synchronous activities (n Fif5). Virtual engagement was promoted through chat, virtual whiteboards, polling, and breakouts. Teacher's use of technology largely replaced traditional practice. Student engagement was largely interactive. Underpinning theories were uncommon. Quality assessments revealed moderate to high risk of bias in study reporting and methodology. Forty-five developments assessed reaction; twenty-five attitudes, knowledge or skills; and two behavior. Outcomes were markedly positive. Eighteen publications reported social media or other outcomes, including reach, engagement, and participation. Limitations included loss of social interactions, lack of hands-on experiences, challenges with technology and issues with study design. Lessons learned highlighted the flexibility of online learning, as well as practical advice to optimize the online environment.

CONCLUSIONS

This review offers guidance to educators attempting to optimize learning in a post-pandemic world. Future developments would benefit from leveraging collaborations, considering technology integration frameworks, underpinning developments with theory, exploring additional outcomes, and designing and reporting developments in a manner that supports replication.

Graduate medical education in anaesthesiology and COVID-19: lessons learned from a global pandemic

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The recent global pandemic has dramatically altered the anaesthesiology educational landscape in unexpected ways. It is important that we pause to learn from this crisis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most resident trainees actively caring for COVID-19 patients present with probable or subclinical finding of post-traumatic stress disorder. Anaesthesia resident training programmes evolved to continue the mission of anaesthesia education in the face of institutional restrictions and evolving clinical crises.

SUMMARY

The recent global COVID-19 pandemic has illustrated how external stressors can cause significant disruption to traditional medical education pathways. Resilience to external disruptive forces in anaesthesia education include a willingness of leadership to understand the problem, flexibility in adapting to the needs of learners and instructors in the face of key challenges, deployment of technology and innovation-minded solution-finding where appropriate, and attention to Maslow's hierarchy of needs.

VIDEO ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/COAN/A77.

Speech and Language Therapists' Perspectives of an E-Learning Course on Providing Feedback in the Clinical Learning Environment

BACKGROUND

A fundamental component of supervising a student speech and language therapist (SLT) on placement is the provision of feedback. There are numerous identified challenges to ensure the delivery of high-quality feedback to optimise student learning and student success. Supervisors can help overcome these challenges and engage in evidence-based feedback processes if they are supported to develop the necessary knowledge and skills. E-learning is one possible means to provide this professional development to a large number of practising SLTs who are geographically dispersed and have conflicting schedules.

AIMS

This study aimed to capture and evaluate the perspectives of SLTs who completed an e-learning course on providing feedback in the clinical learning environment, including the suitability and effectiveness of the e-learning tool used.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

An innovative e-learning course was designed to provide asynchronous video and interactive content on evidence-based theories and practices for effective feedback processes. Clinical scenarios relevant to the discipline of speech and language therapy were included. Participants were invited to complete optional, anonymous pre- and post-evaluation surveys. Data were analysed quantitively (descriptive and inferential statistics) and qualitatively (thematic analysis).

OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

Participants indicated that the e-learning course supported them to enhance their feedback processes in the clinical learning environment through identified changes to their practices. The increases in confidence providing feedback they reported were statistically significant. In addition, the e-learning course was rated highly on numerous variables related to quality. Recommendations for adaptations and additions were also highlighted.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

An e-learning course on effective and evidence-based feedback processes provides an opportunity to provide professional development to a large number of geographically dispersed practitioners in a cost-effective and flexible way. This could ensure more SLTs are confident and competent in their role as supervisor of students, which requires distinct knowledge and skills from that of a practitioner. Ultimately, this will help maximise educator and student success in the feedback process and consequently improve clinical performance and healthcare delivery.