Post-mastectomy reconstruction: a comparative analysis on psychosocial and psychopathological outcomes

Breast cancer-related lymphedema: A critical review on recent progress

Lymphedema is a chronic and debilitating condition characterized by an abnormal buildup of protein-rich fluid in the interstitial tissue, leading to the development of edema and tissue structural alterations. Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) remains a significant healthcare burden because it can develop within days and up to 11-years after the surgery. Specifically, axillary lymph node dissection leads to 30-50 % upper limb lymphedema, which involves the accumulation of protein-rich fluid. In this article, we provide a comprehensive/critical overview of post-mastectomy lymphedema, focusing on key aspects as diagnosis, prevention, and treatment methods. Beginning with clinical condition, the article explores the pathophysiology and risk factors associated with post-mastectomy lymphedema. It further delves into various diagnostic modalities available, highlighting the importance of early detection for optimal management of BCRL. We also examine preventive strategies, emphasizing the role of patient education, lifestyle modifications, and proactive measures in reducing the risk of lymphedema development. In terms of treatment, the article covers a wide array of interventions ranging from conservative approaches like manual lymphatic drainage and compression therapy to surgical techniques such as lymph node transfer and lymphaticovenular anastomosis. Thus, through a comprehensive synthesis of current evidence and clinical practices updates, the review aims to guide healthcare professionals in delivering preventive and effective care while improving outcomes for individuals affected by post-mastectomy lymphedema.

Breast Reconstruction following Mastectomy for Breast Cancer or Prophylactic Mastectomy: Therapeutic Options and Results

(1) Importance of problem: Breast cancer accounted for 685,000 deaths globally in 2020, and half of all cases occur in women with no specific risk factor besides gender and age group. During the last four decades, we have seen a 40% reduction in age-standardized breast cancer mortality and have also witnessed a reduction in the medium age at diagnosis, which in turn means that the number of mastectomies performed for younger women increased, raising the need for adequate breast reconstructive surgery. Advances in oncological treatment have made it possible to limit the extent of what represents radical surgery for breast cancer, yet in the past decade, we have seen a marked trend toward mastectomies in breast-conserving surgery-eligible patients. Prophylactic mastectomies have also registered an upward trend. This trend together with new uses for breast reconstruction like chest feminization in transgender patients has increased the need for breast reconstruction surgery. (2) Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze the types of reconstructive procedures, their indications, their limitations, their functional results, and their safety profiles when used during the integrated treatment plan of the oncologic patient. (3) Methods: We conducted an extensive literature review of the main reconstructive techniques, especially the autologous procedures; summarized the findings; and presented a few cases from our own experience for exemplification of the usage of breast reconstruction in oncologic patients. (4) Conclusions: Breast reconstruction has become a necessary step in the treatment of most breast cancers, and many reconstructive techniques are now routinely practiced. Microsurgical techniques are considered the "gold standard", but they are not accessible to all services, from a technical or financial point of view, so pediculated flaps remain the safe and reliable option, along with alloplastic procedures, to improve the quality of life of these patients.

A Prospective Cohort Study Re-examining Tissue Oximetry Monitoring in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The goal of inpatient monitoring after microsurgical breast reconstruction is to detect vascular compromise before flap loss. Near-infrared tissue oximetry (NITO) is commonly used for this purpose, but recent reports challenge its specificity and utility in current practice. Fifteen years after Keller published his initial study using this technology at our institution, we re-evaluate the role and limitations of this popular monitoring device.

METHODS

A 1-year prospective study was performed for patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction and monitored postoperatively using NITO. Alerts were evaluated, and clinical endpoints relating to an unplanned return to the operating room or flap loss were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients reconstructed with 225 flaps were included within the study. There were no cases of flap loss at the time of discharge. There were 71 alerts relating to a drop in oximetry saturation. Of these, 68 (95.8%) were deemed to be of no significance. In 3 cases (positive predictive value of 4.2%), the alert was significant, and there were concerning clinical signs apparent at that point. A sensor in an inframammary fold position was associated with nearly twice the average number of alerts as compared with areolar or periareolar positions ( P = 0.01). In 4 patients (3.4%), a breast hematoma required operative evacuation, and these cases were detected by nursing clinical examination.

CONCLUSIONS

The monitoring of free flaps after breast reconstruction through tissue oximetry shows a poor positive predictive value for flap compromise and requires clinical corroboration of alerts but missed no pedicle-related adverse events. With a high sensitivity for pedicle-related issues, NITO may be helpful postoperatively, but the exact timeframe for use must be weighed at the institutional level.

The Partner Perspective on Autologous and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Partner involvement in the decision-making process concerning breast reconstruction (BR) after a breast cancer diagnosis may be very supportive for the patient. So far, no study evaluates partner satisfaction with the outcome after BR and the relationship to patient satisfaction. The aim of this study was to assess and compare partner satisfaction of BR with autologous tissue (ABR) and prosthetic implants (IBR), respectively, and compare it to patient-reported outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients undergoing ABR and IBR between January 2014 and December 2020 were asked to participate with their partners. Patient and partner satisfaction with breast reconstruction, overall outcome as well as patient's perceived and self-reported psychosocial well-being were evaluated using the Breast-Q and a modified partner questionnaire, respectively.

RESULTS

Fifty-three couples participated (IBR: n=30, ABR: n = 23). Patient and partner satisfaction with breast (r = 0.552), outcome (r = 0.465) as well as patient's perceived and self-report psychosocial well-being (r = 0.495) were highly correlated with partners scoring significantly higher (p<0.001). In terms of partner satisfaction, both reconstructive procedures achieved satisfactory results. ABR scored higher in terms of softness of breast and how natural the breast feels to touch whereas IBR was rated superior evaluating the breast size.

CONCLUSION

Both reconstructive procedures achieve satisfactory results in terms partner satisfaction whereas patient's psychosocial well-being was highly overestimated by their partners. Hence, partner inclusion in the regular psycho-oncological support might further sensitize them of the high psychological burden of a breast cancer diagnosis and therefore stabilize patients private support system.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Is There a Role for Deescalation of Surgery?

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive presentation of breast cancer, characterized by higher propensity for locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis compared with non-IBC. Because of extensive parenchymal and overlying dermal lymphatic involvement by carcinoma, IBC is unresectable at diagnosis. Trimodality therapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by modified radical mastectomy and adjuvant comprehensive chest wall and regional nodal radiotherapy) has been a well-accepted treatment algorithm for IBC. Over the last few decades, several innovations in systemic therapy have resulted in rising rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) in both the affected breast and the axilla. The latter may present an opportunity for deescalation of lymph node surgery in patients with IBC, as those with an axillary pCR may be able to avoid an axillary dissection. To this end, feasibility data are necessary to address this question. There are very limited data on the safety of breast conservation of IBC; therefore, mastectomy remains the standard of care for this disease. There are also no data addressing the safety of immediate reconstruction in patients with IBC. Considering that some degree of deliberate skin-sparing to facilitate immediate breast reconstruction would be expected, given the extensive skin involvement by disease at diagnosis, the safest oncologic strategy to breast reconstruction in IBC would be the delayed approach.

Postmastectomy Reconstruction in Male Breast Cancer

Introduction

Less than 1% of all breast cancers are diagnosed in males. In females, postmastectomy breast reconstruction is associated with increased patient satisfaction. However, there is a paucity of literature describing reconstructive options for postmastectomy deformity in the male chest. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate postmastectomy reconstruction outcomes in males with breast cancer.

Methods

A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were queried for records pertaining to the study question using medical subject heading (MeSH) terms such as "male breast cancer," "mastectomy," and "reconstruction." No limitations were placed on the year of publication, country of origin, or study size. Study characteristics and patient demographics were collected. Primary outcomes of interest included postoperative complications, recurrence rate, and mortality rate.

Results

A total of 11 articles examining 29 male patients with breast cancer who underwent postmastectomy reconstruction were included for analysis. Literature was most commonly available in the form of case reports. The average age was 59.6 +/-11.4 years. Reconstruction methods included fat grafting (n = 1, 3.4%), silicone implants (n = 1, 3.4%), and autologous chest wall reconstruction with local flaps (n = 26, 89.7%). Postoperative complications occurred in two patients (6.8%), including partial nipple necrosis (n = 1) and hypertrophic scarring (n = 1). Of the studies reporting patient satisfaction, all patients were pleased with the aesthetic appearance of their chest.

Conclusion

This systematic review revealed the limited availability of research regarding postmastectomy chest reconstruction in males with breast cancer. Nevertheless, the evidence available suggests that reconstruction can restore a patient's body image and, thus, should be regularly considered and discussed with male patients. Larger studies are warranted to further shed light on this population.

A multicentre study of the relationship between abdominal flap and mastectomy weights in immediate unilateral free flap breast reconstruction and the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy

Abdominal free flaps are considered the gold standard for post-mastectomy autologous breast reconstruction. A key element of outcome assessment is breast symmetry often achieved by approximating the reconstructed breast dimensions such as weight (wt) to those of the mastectomy. However, the ideal relationship between these two entities remains unclear. 525 immediate unilateral abdominal free flap breast reconstruction (FFBR) patients were enrolled in a multicentre study (UK 141; Italy 384) and subdivided into Group A (flap wt < mastectomy wt, n = 163), Group B (flap wt > mastectomy wt, n = 260) and Group C (flap wt = mastectomy wt, n = 102). Their rates of contralateral balancing and ipsilateral revision surgeries were compared using Chi-Square tests. Radiotherapy influence on these adjustment procedures was also assessed. More contralateral balancing procedures (17%) were performed than ipsilateral revisions (10%). Group A rates of contralateral balancing procedures were three times higher than Group B's with a ratio of 37 to 1 versus Group C (37% vs 11% vs 1% respectively, p < 0.001). Similarly, the ipsilateral breast revision surgery rate in Group A was double that of Group B and almost three times that of Group C (17% vs 8% vs 6% respectively, p = 0.01). Adjuvant radiotherapy disproportionately increased ipsilateral revisions versus contralateral balancing surgeries (p = 0.028). A flap-to-mastectomy weight ratio of less than 1 (Group A) significantly increases subsequent adjustments on both contralateral and reconstructed breasts whilst irradiation predisposes to ipsilateral revisions. This is important in patient counselling and intraoperative flap contouring. Flap weight should ideally approximate or exceed mastectomy weight in unilateral FFBR.

The influence of mastectomy and reconstruction on residual upper limb function in breast cancer survivors

PURPOSE

Breast cancer survivorship is common (90% of women survive 5 or more years), but many women are not able to return to full function and well-being after treatment due to functional limitations, persistent pain, and inability to perform daily activities. Since each surgical reconstructive option (e.g., autologous tissue flaps versus implants) can impact shoulder and arm function differently, it is important to understand how shoulder and upper limb strength, mobility, and function are influenced by the type of surgical intervention. Efforts can then focus on prehabiliation strategies to prevent the onset of limitations and on developing rehabilitation protocols that directly target shortcomings.

METHODS

The current paper presents a review summarizing how shoulder and upper limb function may be affected by surgical mastectomy and breast reconstruction.

RESULTS

Mastectomy and breast reconstruction with implants or autologous tissues present different functional outcomes for patients. Each surgical procedure is associated with unique sequelae derived from the tissues and procedures associated with each surgery. Characterizing the specific functional outcomes associated with each surgical approach will promote the development of targeted rehabilitation strategies that can be implemented into a multidisciplinary treatment planning pathway for breast cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatments for breast cancer, including mastectomy and breast reconstruction, can have negative effects. Focused efforts are needed to better understand treatment-specific effects so that targeted rehabilitation can be developed to improve patient function, QoL, and ability to return to work and life activities post-breast cancer.

Quality-of-Life and Surgical Outcomes for Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Therapeutic Reduction Mammoplasty Versus Mastectomy with Immediate Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic reduction mammoplasty (TRM) is a safe and effective surgical technique that has oncologic outcomes comparable with those achieved by mastectomy. This study aimed to compare surgical and patient-reported outcomes between breast cancer patients treated with TRM and those who had mastectomy with immediate reconstruction (MIR).

METHODS

A 4-year, single-institution, retrospective cohort study analyzed breast cancer patients undergoing TRM and MIR. Patient characteristics and perioperative data were collected from electronic records. Patient-reported outcome data were collected via BREAST-Q questionnaires preoperatively, then 3 months and 12 months postoperatively. A subgroup analysis was performed on locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients for TRM and MIR.

RESULTS

The study included 249 breast reconstructions, of which 77 (31%) were TRM and 172 (69%) were MIR. The mean follow-up time was 2.4 ± 1.2 years. Compared with MIR, TRM had significantly lower major complication rates (9% vs 21%; p = 0.02) and fewer revisionary surgeries (5% vs 37%; p < 0.0001). At 1 year postoperatively, TRM had a significantly greater change in satisfaction with breasts, (+ 27.7 vs + 4.6; p < 0.01) and sexual well-being (+ 20.0 vs - 5.5; p = 0.02) than MIR.

CONCLUSION

For select breast cancer patients, TRM continues to be a safe and effective alternative to mastectomy. The current study demonstrated that TRM patients had fewer major complications and revisionary surgeries, as well as better patient-reported outcomes than MIR.

Health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction compared to total mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery among breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The present review evaluated health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) outcomes in surgical breast cancer survivors who received breast reconstruction (BR), breast-conservation surgery (BCS) or mastectomy (M), and whether HR-QoL domains across generic and disease/surgery-specific questionnaires are compatible. Six electronic databases were searched for appropriate observational studies. Standardized scores for different HR-QoL domains in the BR, BCS, and M treatment groups were extracted from each study for the purpose of a meta-analysis. Using Stata version 14.0, a random-effects meta-analysis model was adopted for each outcome variable to estimate the effect size, 95% CI-confidence intervals, and statistical significance. Sixteen of the 18 eligible studies with BR (n = 1474) and BCS (n = 2612) or M (n = 1458) groups were included in the meta-analysis. The BR group exhibited a better physical health (k = 12; 0.1, 95% CI 0.04, 0.24) and body image (k = 12; 0.50, 95% CI 0.10, 0.89) than the M group. However, the two groups exhibited comparable social health (k = 13; 0.1, 95% CI -0.07, 0.37), emotional health (k = 13; -0.08, 95% CI - 0.41, 0.25), global health (k = 7; 0.1, 95% CI - 0.01, 0.27), and sexual health (k =11; 0.2, 95% CI - 0.02,0.57). There was no clear evidence of the superiority of BR to BCS for all the six domains. These results suggest that HR-QoL outcomes in BR and BCS groups are better than the M group. Therefore, women opting for BR or BCS are likely to report fairly better HR-QoL outcomes than M. However, due to the significant heterogeneity observed in most BR versus BCS outcomes, developing a unified questionnaire incorporating both breast/surgery-specific and generic HR-QoL domains is warranted.

Assessing the Relationship between Anxiety and Revision Surgery following Autologous Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Revision procedures address contour irregularities and aesthetic concerns following autologous breast reconstruction. Mental health diagnoses are known to influence patient satisfaction with reconstruction. The authors aimed to identify oncologic, reconstructive, and demographic factors, including mental health diagnoses, associated with the number of revisions after autologous breast reconstruction.

METHODS

The medical records of all adult women undergoing abdominal free flap-based breast reconstruction at a major academic institution between 2011 and 2016 were reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with receipt of revisions. Negative binomial regression was used to identify characteristics associated with number of revisions received.

RESULTS

Of 272 patients identified, 55.2 percent received one revision, 23.2 percent received two revisions, and 10.3 percent received three or more revisions after autologous breast reconstruction (median, one; range, zero to five). After adjustment on multivariate analysis, anxiety (OR, 4.34; p = 0.016) and bilateral reconstruction (OR, 3.10; p = 0.017) were associated with receipt of any revisions; other oncologic and reconstructive factors including breast cancer stage, receipt of radiation therapy, and type or timing of free flap reconstruction were not associated with revisions. Using univariate negative binomial regression, anxiety (incidence rate ratio, 1.34; p = 0.006), Caucasian race (incidence rate ratio, 1.24; p = 0.02), and bilateral reconstruction (incidence rate ratio, 1.39; p = 0.04) were predictive of increased numbers of revisions received. After stepwise selection on multivariate analysis, anxiety remained the only significant predictor of increased numbers of revisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative anxiety significantly influences the number of revisions after autologous breast reconstruction. Further research is necessary to better understand the interplay among mental health, patient preference, and outcomes in breast reconstruction.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

How patient acceptability affects access to breast reconstruction: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

There has been limited research on the acceptability of breast reconstruction (BR) to breast cancer patients. We performed interviews to explore breast cancer patients' acceptability of BR.

DESIGN

Qualitative study.

SETTING

Recruitment from six Ontario hospitals across the province (Toronto, Ottawa, Hamilton, London, Thunder Bay and Windsor) as well as key breast cancer organisations between November 2017 and June 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

Women of any age with a diagnosis of breast cancer planning to undergo or having undergone a mastectomy with or without BR.

INTERVENTION

Sixty-minute semi-structured interviews were analysed using qualitative descriptive methodology that draws on inductive thematic analysis.

OUTCOME

In the telephone interviews, participants discussed their experience with breast cancer and accessing BR, focusing on the acceptability of BR as a surgical option post-mastectomy.

RESULTS

Of the 28 participants, 11 had undergone BR at the time of the interview, 5 at the time of mastectomy and 6 at a later date. Four inter-related themes were identified that reflected women's evolving ideas about BR as they progressed through different stages of their disease and treatment. The themes we developed were: (1) cancer survival before BR, (2) the influence of physicians on BR acceptability, (3) patient's shift to BR acceptance and (4) women's need to justify BR. For many women, access to BR surgery became more salient over time, thus adding a temporal element to the existing access framework.

CONCLUSION

In our study, women's access to BR was negatively influenced by the poor acceptability of this surgical procedure. The acceptability of BR was a complex process taking place over time, from the moment of breast cancer diagnosis to BR consideration. BR access may be improved through enhancing patient acceptability of BR. We suggest adapting the current access to care frameworks by further developing the concept of acceptability.

Patterns of breast reconstruction in patients diagnosed with inflammatory breast cancer: The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute's Inflammatory Breast Cancer Program experience

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) exhibits dermal lymphatic involvement at presentation, and thus, the standard surgical approach is a nonskin-sparing modified radical mastectomy (MRM) without breast reconstruction (BR). In this study, we evaluated immediate and delayed BR receipt and its outcomes in IBC. Using an IRB-approved database, we retrospectively evaluated stage III IBC patients who received trimodality therapy (preoperative systemic therapy, followed by MRM and postmastectomy chest wall/regional nodal radiation). Patients with an insufficient response to preoperative systemic therapy and/or who required preoperative radiotherapy were excluded. BR receipt, timing, and morbidity were evaluated. Among 240 stage III IBC patients diagnosed between 1997 and 2016, 40 (17%) underwent BR. Thirteen (33%) had immediate, and 27 (67%) had delayed BR. Four patients had complications (1 [8%] immediate BR and 3 [11%] delayed BR); only 1 BR (delayed) was unsuccessful. From the MRM date, the median time to recurrence was 35 months (<1-212) and median overall survival was 87 months (<1-212). In this cohort of stage III IBC patients, only 11% pursued delayed BR following trimodality therapy, possibly attributable to the observed high recurrence rates hindering BR. Further studies addressing BR outcomes in IBC are needed for better counseling patients regarding their reconstructive options.

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) following mastectomy with breast reconstruction or without reconstruction: a systematic review

The cornerstone of reconstructive surgery following mastectomy is to restore cosmesis and improve physical and psychological health. Consequently, it has become essential for instruments that measure surgical outcomes to include the direct perspective of patients. Many reviews have failed to show significant improvements in quality of life domains following breast reconstruction compared to mastectomy alone. However, with advances in surgical techniques and patient reported outcome measure (PROM) assessment tools designed precisely for breast reconstruction patients, a modern systematic review is warranted. An electronic literature review was performed using CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Medline (using PubMed) comparing patient reported outcome measures of patients undergoing mastectomy alone versus patients undergoing mastectomy with breast reconstruction. Studies in the English and Portuguese languages since the year 2000 were included. The review was undertaken adhering to PRISMA guidelines with last entry on the 31/5/2018. Full text review yield 42 articles of relevance to the inclusion criteria. The most widely used PROM instruments such as Breast-Q, EORTC-Q30/Q23, Short Form 36, FACT-B and others are explored. The specific difficulties conducting such studies and biases identified are investigated further. Studies comparing mastectomy alone against mastectomy with reconstruction show difficulties forming groups with similar clinical and epidemiological characteristics. There are inherent limitations to performing a randomised controlled trial on this topic, including matching patient groups in terms of age, socioeconomical background and cancer staging, and this affects the results of the PROM instruments. Within these limitations, the literature suggests that PROM support the use of breast reconstruction following mastectomy but care must be made selecting patients. The finding is supported by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines which state that breast reconstruction should be offered to all women undergoing breast cancer surgery.

Capsular fibrosis in aesthetic and reconstructive-cancer patients: A retrospective analysis of 319 cases

BACKGROUND

Implant-based breast augmentation is one of the most frequently performed operations in plastic surgery worldwide, for aesthetic and reconstructive reasons. Capsular fibrosis is the most common long-term foreign body response after breast implant augmentation.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the occurrence of capsular contracture in aesthetic and reconstructive-cancer patients, including those patients who received radiotherapy prior to breast reconstruction with implants.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective evaluation of 319 patients who underwent breast implant revision between Jan 2000 and Oct 2016. The patient group was comprised of 175 reconstructive-cancer patients and 144 patients who underwent operation for aesthetic reasons. The occurrence of capsular fibrosis, other complications and the time-period between implantation of breast implants and revision surgery (TP) was analyzed.

RESULTS

For all 319 patients the mean TP was 7.9 years (7.86±0.45). The most common complication in all revisions was capsular fibrosis (65.1% of all revisions). In aesthetic patients with capsular fibrosis the mean TP was 11.9 years (11.89±0.95, p < 0.001). This mean TP was significantly higher than the mean TP of 6.1 years (6.13±0.56, p < 0.001) in breast cancer patients with capsular fibrosis. Preoperatively irradiated cancer patients had a mean TP of 6.2 years (6.17±0.95), compared to a mean TP of 5.1 years (5.07±0.19, p = 0.051) in non-irradiated cancer patients, which was not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that aesthetic patients exhibit a significantly higher mean TP compared to breast cancer patients, suggesting that reconstructive-cancer patients in general develop capsular fibrosis earlier. Despite the literature, we did not find a significant influence of preoperative radiotherapy on the occurrence of capsular fibrosis in reconstructive-cancer patients. Further clinical studies need to be conducted to identify methods to decrease the risk of developing capsular fibrosis.

The Influence of Marital Status on Contemporary Patterns of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Marital status is known to influence quality of life, survival, and treatment decision-making after breast cancer diagnosis. We aimed to determine whether relationship status impacts contemporary patterns of immediate breast reconstruction.

METHODS

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-18 was used to identify females undergoing mastectomy for stage 0-III breast cancer from 1998 to 2014. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the association of relationship status with the likelihood of postmastectomy reconstruction. Patients were grouped by diagnosis year to assess change in the reconstructed population with time. Among younger patients ≤45 years, a generalized logistic model was used to predict reconstruction subtype.

RESULTS

Among 346,418 patients, reconstruction after mastectomy was more likely to occur in women with relationship support in the form of a marriage or partner [odds ratio (OR) 1.31; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.28-1.34; p<0.001]. Women who were separated (OR 0.76), single (OR 0.73), or widowed (OR 0.56) were significantly less likely than married women to undergo reconstruction (all p<0.001). During the 17-year study period, change in reconstruction rates with time varied by relationship status (interaction p=0.02), with reconstruction rates among divorced patients increasing more slowly than those among married and partnered women. Among younger women, subtype patterns varied by relationship status (p=0.004), with divorced women less likely to receive autologous over implant reconstruction (OR 0.87; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Relationship status may influence decision-making regarding pursuit and type of postmastectomy reconstruction. Consideration of support networks of patients with breast cancer could facilitate tailored preoperative counseling by reconstructive surgeons.

Associations Between Breast Cancer Survivorship and Adverse Mental Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Background

We aimed to systematically review the evidence on adverse mental health outcomes in breast cancer survivors (≥1 year) compared with women with no history of cancer.

Methods

Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, PsycINFO, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Social Sciences Citation Index, and through backward citation tracking. Two researchers selected the studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias.

Results

Sixty studies were included. Of 38 studies of depression, 33 observed more depression in breast cancer survivors; this was statistically significant in 19 studies overall, including six of seven where depression was ascertained clinically, three of four studies of antidepressants, and 13 of 31 that quantified depressive symptoms. Of 21 studies of anxiety, 17 observed more anxiety in breast cancer survivors, statistically significant in 11 studies overall, including two of four with clinical/prescription-based outcomes, and in eight of 17 of anxiety symptoms. Breast cancer survivors also had statistically significantly increased symptoms/frequency of neurocognitive dysfunction (18 of 24 studies), sexual dysfunctions (5 of 6 studies), sleep disturbance (5 of 5 studies), stress-related disorders/PTSD (2 of 3 studies), suicide (2 of 2 studies), somatisation (2 of 2 studies), and bipolar and obsessive-compulsive disorders (1 of 1 study each). Studies were heterogeneous in terms of participants' characteristics, time since diagnosis, ascertainment of outcomes, and measures reported. Approximately one-half of the studies were at high risk of selection bias and confounding by socio-economic status.

Conclusions

There is compelling evidence of an increased risk of anxiety, depression and suicide, and neurocognitive and sexual dysfunctions in breast cancer survivors compared with women with no prior cancer. This information can be used to support evidence-based prevention and management strategies. Further population-based and longitudinal research would help to better characterize these associations.

In the Age of Breast Augmentation, Breast Reconstruction Provides an Opportunity to Augment the Breast

Background:

Augmentation mammoplasty remains the most common cosmetic surgery procedure performed. The objective of this article is to evaluate the impact of augmented volume of the reconstructed breast in patients that undergo nipple-sparing mastectomy and patients previously augmented who undergo mastectomy with tissue expander/implant-based reconstruction.

Methods:

Patients undergoing skin-sparing mastectomy, nipple-sparing mastectomy, and mastectomy after previous augmentation followed by tissue expander/implant-based reconstruction between June 2011 and April 2015 by 2 surgeons at the same institution were included. Retrospective chart review of the patients identified using these criteria was performed to record patient characteristics, complications, breast volume, implant volume, and percentage change in volume at the time of reconstruction. Percentage change of breast volume was calculated using the formula (implant breast weight)/(breast weight) for skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy patients and (final breast implant weight − [breast weight + augmentation breast implant weight])/([breast weight + augmentation breast implant]) for patients undergoing mastectomy following previous augmentation.

Results:

A total of 293 patients were included in the study with 63 patients who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy, 166 patients who underwent skin-sparing mastectomy, and 64 patients who underwent previous augmentation with subsequent mastectomy. Mean percentage change in breast volume was 66% in the nipple-sparing mastectomy group, 15% for the right breast and 18% for the left breast in the skin-sparing mastectomy group, and 81% for the right breast and 72% for the left breast in the mastectomy following previous augmentation group. Complication rate for nipple-sparing mastectomy was 27%, mastectomy following previous augmentation was 20.3%, and skin-sparing mastectomy group was 18.7%.

Conclusion:

Patients who undergo nipple-sparing mastectomy or mastectomy following previous augmentation have the ability to achieve greater volume in their reconstructed breast via tissue expander/implant-based reconstruction.

Role of Age, Tumor Grade, and Radiation Therapy on Immediate Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Despite the psychological benefits and oncologic safety of postmastectomy breast reconstruction, most breast cancer patients do not undergo reconstruction. To better understand the patterns of breast reconstruction usage, it is important to identify the clinicopathologic factors associated with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR), and whether modification of the reconstruction incidence when stratified by patient- or cancer-related factors exists in the breast cancer population. The primary objectives were to determine whether the incidence of immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction varies across age, and whether the tumor grade or radiation therapy modify the effect of age on the incidence of immediate breast reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we identified women who had undergone mastectomy for breast cancer from 2000 to 2014. Inverse probability of treatment-weighted log-binomial regression was used to estimate the effect of age on IBR after accounting for potential confounding by patient demographic data and cancer characteristics. Potential effect measure modification by tumor grade and radiation therapy on the age-IBR relationship was also assessed.

RESULTS

Of 321,206 women, 77,798 (24.2%) had undergone IBR. Age was significantly associated with IBR prevalence (P < .0001), with younger women more likely to undergo IBR. Both tumor grade (P < .0001) and radiation therapy (P < .0001) modified the effect of age on IBR.

CONCLUSION

Compared with their older counterparts, younger breast cancer patients were more likely to undergo IBR, and both tumor grade and radiation therapy were differentially associated with the likelihood of IBR across patient age.

Attitudes and Decisional Conflict Regarding Breast Reconstruction Among Breast Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

The decision to undergo breast reconstruction (BR) surgery after mastectomy is made during stressful circumstances. Many women do not feel well prepared to make this decision.

OBJECTIVE

Using the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, this study aims to describe women's reasons to choose or not choose BR, BR knowledge, decisional preparedness, and decisional conflict about BR. Possible demographic, medical, BR knowledge, and attitudinal correlates of decisional conflict about BR were also evaluated.

METHODS

Participants were 55 women with early-stage breast cancer drawn from the baseline data of a pilot randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of a BR decision support aid for breast cancer patients considering BR.

RESULTS

The most highly ranked reasons to choose BR were the desire for breasts to be equal in size, the desire to wake up from surgery with a breast in place, and perceived bother of a scar with no breast. The most highly ranked reasons not to choose BR were related to the surgical risks and complications. Regression analyses indicated that decisional conflict was associated with higher number of reasons not to choose BR and lower levels of decisional preparedness.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that breast cancer patients considering BR may benefit from decisional support.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Healthcare professionals may facilitate decision making by focusing on reasons for each patient's uncertainty and unaddressed concerns. All patients, even those who have consulted with a plastic surgeon and remain uncertain about their decision, may benefit from decision support from a health professional.

Method of breast reconstruction and the development of lymphoedema

Background

Several studies have demonstrated an association between immediate autologous or implant-based breast reconstruction and a reduced incidence of lymphoedema. However, few of these have ocused specifically on whether the reconstruction method affects the development of lymphoedema. The study evaluated the potential impact of breast reconstruction modality on the incidence of lymphoedema.

Methods

Outcomes of women with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy and immediate reconstruction using an autologous flap or a tissue expander/implant between 2008 and 2013 were reviewed. Arm or hand swelling with pertinent clinical signs of lymphoedema and excess volume compared with those of the contralateral side was diagnosed as lymphoedema. The cumulative incidence of lymphoedema was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Clinicopathological factors associated with the development of lymphoedema were investigated by Cox regression analysis.

Results

A total of 429 reconstructions (214 autologous and 215 tissue expander/implant) were analysed; the mean follow-up of patients was 45·3 months. The two groups had similar characteristics, except that women in the autologous group were older, had a higher BMI, and more often had preoperative radiotherapy than women in the tissue expander/implant group. Overall, the 2-year cumulative incidence of lymphoedema was 6·8 per cent (autologous 4·2 per cent, tissue expander/implant 9·3 per cent). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that autologous reconstruction was associated with a significantly reduced risk of lymphoedema compared with that for tissue expander/implant reconstruction. Axillary dissection, a greater number of dissected lymph nodes and postoperative chemotherapy were also independent risk factors for lymphoedema.

Conclusion

The method of breast reconstruction may affect subsequent development of lymphoedema.

'Do you mean I'm not whole?': Exploring the role of support in women's experiences of mastectomy without reconstruction

This study explores the role of others in supporting younger women who opt not to reconstruct their breast post-mastectomy. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with six women diagnosed with breast cancer in their 30s/40s. The women lived in England, had been diagnosed a minimum of 5 years previously and had undergone unilateral mastectomy. An interpretative phenomenological analysis revealed three themes: Assuring the self: 'I'll love you whatever', Challenging the self: 'Do you mean I'm not whole?' and Accepting the self: 'I've come out the other side'. The women's experiences of positive support and challenges to their sense of self are discussed.

Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: does it decrease depression at the long-term?

BACKGROUND

Depression is associated with breast cancer survivors in 22%. Although breast reconstruction (BR) is intended to provide psychological improvements such as reducing depression, literature is inconclusive and without long-term follow-up. The objective is to evaluate the impact of BR after breast cancer related mastectomy on the long-term depression risk and assess predictive factors for depression.

METHODS

Women who underwent a curative mastectomy between 1999 and 2009 were included. After a mean follow-up of more than 6 years after operation, the Beck Depression Inventory-13 (BDI-13) evaluated depressive symptoms. Multivariable regression analysis provided predictors for depression.

RESULTS

A total of 139 patients, 34 (24.5%) with and 105 (75.5%) without BR, were analyzed. Seventy-seven patients (48.2%) were at high risk for mild (n=58), moderate (n=5) or severe (n=4) depression. There was a trend for slightly better BDI-13 outcomes for women who underwent BR (2 vs. 4; P=0.06). Living alone [odds ratio (OR): 2.16; P=0.04], low educational level (OR: 3.70; P<0.01) and adjuvant hormonal/endocrine-therapy (OR: 2.36; P=0.02) were associated with an increased depression risk.

CONCLUSIONS

BR has no clear influence on depressive symptoms on the long-term. Predictive factors should alert clinicians to assess depressive symptoms in specific breast cancer patients during follow-up.

The Psychosexual Impact of Partial and Total Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective One-Year Longitudinal Study

BACKGROUND

This prospective trial sought to explore patients' satisfaction and expectations for surgery in the areas of sexuality and body image and to evaluate outcomes pertaining to sexual well-being after total and partial breast reconstruction (BR).

METHODS

Patients who underwent mastectomy and immediate total BR (group 1; n = 60) or lumpectomy and reduction mammoplasty (group 2; n = 10) completed a questionnaire preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively to assess their satisfaction with their sex life and body image, perceptions of breasts as a source of sexuality, and expectations of surgery in these areas. Surveys were scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with 5 indicating strongly agree. Change scores were evaluated in the 2 groups (P = 0.05).

RESULTS

In group 1, satisfaction with sex life and body image was unchanged. Pursuit of sexual attractiveness (from 3.78 to 3.31, P = 0.02) and an improved body image (from 3.89 to 3.33, P < 0.01) were cited as expectations for surgery but were achieved less often. When stratified by different types of reconstruction, there were no discernible differences in responses. In group 2, the patients reported an unexpected increase in their partner's perception of them as womanly (from 1.33 to 2.50, P = 0.01) and greater gains in the ability to wear sexually provocative clothing (from 1.78 to 3.11, P < 0.01).Preoperative expectations for improved body image were more often met in group 2 than group 1 (from 3.60 to 4.00 vs from 3.89 to 3.33, P = 0.02). Group 2 experienced greater improvement in body image satisfaction (from 2.80 to 3.80 vs from 3.37 to 3.44, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall satisfaction with sex life and body image was preserved for both groups; however, the oncoplastic approach achieved significantly larger gains in body image perception.

Immediate Implant Reconstruction Is Associated With a Reduced Risk of Lymphedema Compared to Mastectomy Alone: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the risk of lymphedema associated with immediate breast reconstruction compared to mastectomy alone.

BACKGROUND

Immediate breast reconstruction is increasingly performed at the time of mastectomy. Few studies have examined whether breast reconstruction impacts development of lymphedema.

METHODS

A total of 616 patients with breast cancer who underwent 891 mastectomies between 2005 and 2013 were prospectively screened for lymphedema at our institution, with 22.2 months' median follow-up. Mastectomies were categorized as immediate implant, immediate autologous, or no reconstruction. Arm measurements were performed preoperatively and during postoperative follow-up using a Perometer. Lymphedema was defined as 10% or more arm volume increase compared to preoperative. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to determine lymphedema rates and risk factors.

RESULTS

Of 891 mastectomies, 65% (580/891) had immediate implant, 11% (101/891) immediate autologous, and 24% (210/891) no reconstruction. The two-year cumulative incidence of lymphedema was as follows: 4.08% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.59-6.41%] implant, 9.89% (95% CI: 4.98-19.1%) autologous, and 26.7% (95% CI: 20.4-34.4%) no reconstruction. By multivariate analysis, immediate implant [hazards ratio (HR): 0.352, P < 0.0001] but not autologous (HR: 0.706, P = 0.2151) reconstruction was associated with a significantly reduced risk of lymphedema compared to no reconstruction. Axillary lymph node dissection (P < 0.0001), higher body mass index (P < 0.0001), and greater number of nodes dissected (P = 0.0324) were associated with increased lymphedema risk.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study suggests that in patients for whom implant-based reconstruction is available, immediate implant reconstruction does not increase the risk of lymphedema compared to mastectomy alone.

Patient-Reported Quality of Life After Breast Reconstruction: A One-Year Longitudinal Study Using the WHO-QOL Survey

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported quality of life (QOL) is an important measure of the impact that breast reconstruction has on postmastectomy patients. This study seeks to describe psychosocial outcomes after breast reconstruction and to identify factors that influence them.

METHODS

All patients who underwent immediate postmastectomy reconstruction by the senior author between 2009 and 2011 were offered participation in this study. Patients completed the World Health Organization QOL-BREF questionnaire preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. Change scores were compared across reconstructive techniques, as well as across various demographic and clinical variables.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-nine women completed the preoperative questionnaire, and 60 patients completed the follow-up questionnaire at 1 year (response rate, 46.5%). Compared to the preoperative baseline, overall QOL was unchanged, general satisfaction with health improved significantly, and QOL in physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains decreased (P < 0.05 for all but social domains). On bivariate analysis, being in a relationship at the time of reconstruction was associated with a decline in overall QOL, as well as the quality of social relationships and environment. Educational level impacted how physical and psychological wellness evolved after surgery. Patients with a higher cancer stage reported a decrease in satisfaction with health at 1 year. Type of reconstruction, development of a complication, and need for additional surgery did not influence any of these outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

At 1-year follow-up from postmastectomy reconstruction, breast cancer survivors report a similar overall QOL, but significant decrements in physical, psychological, and environmental QOL. Satisfaction with health improved. The type of breast reconstruction did not influence any of these outcomes.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Breast Reconstruction Surgery and Therapeutic Mammoplasty: Prospective Evaluation 1 Year Post-Surgery with BREAST-Q Questionnaire

Breast Cancer (BC) treatment leads to mutilation and destruction of breast shape with negative effects on body image and self-esteem.One of the main goals of reconstructive and oncoplastic breast surgery is to satisfy patients and improve their quality of life (QoL).Therefore, it is important to assess the patient experience post-surgery by means of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that focus on the patient's perception of the surgery and surgical care, as well as psychosocial well-being and physical functioning. The objective of the current study was to identify predictors of patient satisfaction such as breast appearance including implant type in a selective sample of women who underwent breast reconstruction surgery using implants. Participants in this prospective study were women, (age 26-75 years) that were newly diagnosed with breast carcinoma. All consecutive patients who underwent breast reconstruction between January 2013 and October 2014 were asked to complete the BREAST-Q questionnaire 1 year after surgery. 120 patients underwent unilateral breast reconstruction using implant. While 38 patients underwent reconstruction with opposite breast reduction symmertization, 27 patients underwent therapeutic mammoplasty. The response rate for BREAST-Q questionnaire completion was 98 % with 147 out of 150 study participants completed the questionnaire. From the data collected from 147 patients, the responses could be distributed into 4 distinct groups based on the reconstruction outcomes namely "very much satisfied" (93 %) or "definitely and mostly satisfied" (94 %) or "satisfied" with the outcome (88 %) or "definitely agree on having reconstruction rather than the alternative of having no breast "(91 %).The results showed significant improvement in all four areas that were evaluated after surgery namely satisfaction with the appearance of the breasts, psychosocial, sexual and physical well-being. While the reconstruction surgery had an overall positive impact on quality of life it was observed that in patients that did not undergo breast reconstruction psychological issues related to sexuality were observed. Many newly diagnosed BC patients do not opt for these new surgical procedures due to psychological trauma or lack of information. Based on these observations, we propose that Breast Cancer Management protocols should also include additional counselling support for the newly diagnosed BC patients on the option of breast reconstruction along with conventional medical treatment counselling by the Oncosurgeon.

Patient-reported outcome measures in reconstructive breast surgery: is there a role for generic measures?

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes provide an invaluable tool in the assessment of outcomes in plastic surgery. Traditionally, patient-reported outcomes have consisted of either generic or ad hoc measures; however, more recently, there has been interest in formally constructed and validated questionnaires that are specifically designed for a particular patient population. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine whether generic measures still have a role in the evaluation of breast reconstruction outcomes, given the recent popularity and push for use of specific measures.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify all articles using patient-reported outcomes in the assessment of postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Frequency of use was tabulated and the most frequently used tools were assessed for success of use, using criteria described previously by the Medical Outcomes Trust.

RESULTS

To date, the most frequently used measures are still generic measures. The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey was the most frequently used and most successfully applied showing evidence of responsiveness in multiple settings. Other measures such as the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Hopwood Body Image Scale, and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale were able to show responsiveness in certain settings but lacked evidence as universal tools for the assessment of outcomes in reconstructive breast surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the recent advent of measures designed specifically to assess patient-reported outcomes in the breast reconstruction population, there still appears to be a role for the use of generic instruments. Many of these tools would benefit from undergoing formal validation in the breast reconstruction population.

Circumvertical mastectomy incision: refinement in the surgical scar of implant-based breast reconstruction

Different surgical incisions have been proposed for skin-sparing mastectomy in an attempt to better disguise the remaining scar. These techniques are more hidden than the Stewart incision but can still leave scars in visible places and can restrict the natural shape of the upper pole. They can also add complexity and time to the mastectomy, requiring extensive retraction that could damage the salvaged skin flaps to perform an adequate mastectomy. We present a circumvertical mastectomy incision technique, which limits the mastectomy scar to the inferior pole, provides natural lateral contour, superior pole fullness, and contributes to a more youthful breast projection. Between November 2011 and November 2012, 51 women underwent circumvertical AlloDerm/tissue expansion reconstruction at our institution by a single surgeon. The reconstruction was bilateral in 30 patients and unilateral in 21 patients for a total of 81 breasts. Of the 81 reconstructed breasts, 5 patients went on to require a latissimus dorsi flap for definitive reconstruction and 3 failed breast reconstruction for a completion rate of 96%. The goal of creating breast reconstruction results comparable to those of cosmetic breast surgery is becoming a reality. Circumvertical incision is a technique that can prevent visible upper hemispheric breast scarring, limit upper pole constriction by scar placement, and preserves or restores breast projection. Following the principles of aesthetic breast surgery and repositioning the mastectomy scar, one can reconstruct a breast with a more disguised scar, which can be hidden from the patient's downward gaze.

Younger women's experiences of deciding against delayed breast reconstruction post-mastectomy following breast cancer: An interpretative phenomenological analysis

Most women do not reconstruct their breast(s) post-mastectomy. The experiences of younger women who maintain this decision, although important to understand, are largely absent in the research literature. This interview-based study uses interpretative phenomenological analysis to explore the experiences of six women, diagnosed with primary breast cancer in their 30s/40s, who decided against delayed reconstruction. Findings reported here focus on one superordinate theme (decision-making) from a larger analysis, illustrating that the women's drive to survive clearly influenced their initial decision-making process. Their tenacity in maintaining their decision is highlighted, despite non-reconstruction sometimes being presented negatively by medical teams. Patient-centred support recommendations are made.

Positive and negative aspects of well-being as correlates of breast reconstruction decision

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to explore the role of positive and negative aspects of well-being in a breast reconstruction decision, described in terms of the trans-theoretical model of change (TTM).

METHODS

The study comprised 216 women after total mastectomy in the cross-sectional design. The positive aspects of well-being were measured using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and Generalised Self-Efficacy Scale; the negative aspects were assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (T-Anxiety scale).

RESULTS

The multinomial logistic regression analyses were implemented, and the action stage was chosen as a relevant category. McFadden's pseudo R-squared for positive, negative and combined aspects of well-being models equalled 0.28, 0.13 and 0.27, respectively. For the first model, the differential effects were observed for well-being, age and relationship status (54 % correctly classified cases), whereas for the model with negative aspects-only age and well-being (44 % correctly classified cases). For a model combining two aspects of well-being, the pattern was similar to the one observed for positive well-being (53 % correctly classified cases). The likelihood of classifying women in the action stage rather than in the pre-contemplation stage was determined by three variables: being in a relationship, better well-being and younger age. For the contemplation stage, the same relations were obtained for well-being and age. Finally, for the preparation stage, the well-being effect disappeared.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that positive rather than negative aspects of well-being, after control for sociodemographic variables, may be significant correlates of breast reconstruction decision.

[Abdominal perforator flap (DIEP) and autologous latissimus dorsi in breast reconstruction. A retrospective comparative study about the first 60 cases of a same surgeon]

INTRODUCTION

Autologous techniques for breast reconstruction get the best cosmetic results. Aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction is an important evaluation criterion. The indication is based on technical criteria (morphological, medical history) and the wishes of the patient. A rigorous evaluation of the results is necessary to assist the patients in their choice of reconstruction.

METHODS

Thirty-three DIEP and 27 latissimus dorsi were involved. A satisfaction questionnaire was sent to patients to collect the aesthetic evaluation of their reconstructed breast, sequelae at the donor site of the flap as well as their overall satisfaction. Post-operative photographs of the patients were subject to aesthetical evaluation by two groups of observers. Complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

The DIEP tends to get higher aesthetic satisfaction regarding the symmetry of the breasts and the volume of the reconstructed breast (P=0.05), and a better overall satisfaction (P=0.02). The uniformity of the colour of the reconstructed breast was considered superior by observers in the latissimus dorsi group (P=0.005). Donor site scar of DIEP was considered more unsightly while the latissimus dorsi was considered more painful (P=0.04) and uncomfortable, with more frequently contour abnormalities (P=0.03). We noted two total flap necrosis and three partial necrosis in the group DIEP, and two partial flap necrosis in the group latissimus dorsi.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence that can guide the patient and the surgeon in the complex process of therapeutic decision, without exempting the latter from a careful selection of indications.

The impact of immediate breast reconstruction on post-mastectomy lymphedema in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) with autologous tissue on the development of post-mastectomy lymphedema in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM). A retrospective chart review was performed for early-stage breast cancer patients who underwent MRM between January 2001 and December 2009. Patients were categorized into two groups based on whether or not they underwent IBR. The incidence of lymphedema was assessed and compared. A total of 712 patients underwent MRM, which included 117 patients undergoing IRB. There were no significant differences between two groups except for a lower body mass index in the reconstruction group. Comparing the incidence of lymphedema using multivariate logistic regression analysis, the reconstruction group had a significantly lower incidence of lymphedema (p-value = 0.023). Breast cancer patients who underwent MRM with IBR had a significantly lower incidence of lymphedema than those in the non-reconstruction group.

[Oncologic, functional, and aesthetics results; evaluation of the quality of life after latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction. About a retrospective series of 450 patients]

Retrospective assesssment from 1998 to 2005 from women who have a breast reconstruction by autologus latissimus flap or by latissimus flap and silicone breast implant for differed breast reconstruction (DBR) or mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction (MIBR).

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Analysis of oncologic results on 450 patients. Analysis of aesthetic, functional results and of quality of life by an anonymous questionnaire in the non progressive patients (407): 263 appraisable answers (13 DBR, 127 MIBR). Middle age: 49.8 years.

RESULTS ONCOLOGIC

Forty-three patients (9.5%) had a relapse of their disease, 33 patients died (7.2%). The relapse of the disease was done in the form of metastasis alone: 29 (67.4%), metastasis and local recurrence: three (7%), local recurrence only: four (9.3%), not specified: seven (16.3%). The average time between the breast reconstruction and the relapse was 18.25±15.4 months.

AESTHETIC RESULTS

The overall assessment is of 7.68/10. There is no statistical difference between immediate reconstruction and delayed reconstruction. A total of 11.2% patients considered it to be bad (<5/10). The symmetry between the two breasts in time is of 6.6/10 and 19.9% patients considered it to be bad (<5/10). The scar ransom, considered to be most important, is mostly in the back (4.1/10) then on the controlateral breast and then the breast reconstruction. This ransom is not easily acceptable in 15 to 20% of the patients.

FUNCTIONAL RESULTS

The discomfort and the pain prevail above all in the back (3.56 and 2.59/10). Weaker symptoms in the event of immediate reconstruction than delayed reconstruction. We noted that 77.2% had kinesitherapy after surgery and 18.9% continues to have kinesitherapy, long time after surgery, mainly for massages of the back. The handicap is considered to be overall low 2.5/10 but 10% of the patients keep a feeling of important handicap (>7.5/10).

QUALITY OF LIFE RESULTS

Seventy-one of the patients are serene. The discomfort to wear a bathing suit or to look at bare-chested is low (2.59 and 2.44/10). However 8.9% are in a very discomfort to see themselves bare-chested and 17.6% to show themselves to their spouse, with an impact on their emotional and sexual life in 36.4% of the cases. There is no significant difference between MIBR and DBR but on the other hand according to the judgement of the woman of her aesthetic result. A total of 95.7% do not regret having made this breast reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

This study makes it possible to concentrate on the group of non satisfied patient for better determining the causes and the improvements of the surgical techniques to bring but also the overall surgical management of the patient even if most of the patients were mainly satisfied with their breast reconstruction.

[Experiences of mastectomised women. A phenomenological study]

OBJECTIVE

To understand the life experience of women with mastectomy in relation to their disease, analysing what leads some women to have breast reconstruction and others not to do so. Identify the situation of mastectomised women with lymphoedemas, alopecia and other problems.

METHOD

Phenomenological qualitative research. Twenty-nine in-depth interviews were conducted on the women through specific informants in the oncology services of the Hospital Vall d'Hebron; and the gynaecology unit at the Salud La Mina Primary Care Centre in Barcelona. The age range was between 20 and 69 years.

RESULTS

Through the analysis of the interviews it was possible to reveal the phenomenon in research. The following subjects were those of most relevance: there women with reconstructed and non-reconstructed breasts, and a mutilated body image through the loss of one or both breasts. Participation of women in social occasions, use of clothing and lifestyle. The cancer is visualised: lymphoedemas, loss of hair with an affect on the public image.

CONCLUSIONS

Younger women, graduates and middle class ladies and those over 40 with a primary education are those that have a breast reconstruction. Middle-high and high class graduates do not have a breast reconstruction. They negotiate their relationship with their partner in other ways.

Evaluation of quality of life after breast reconstruction using an autologous latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap

AIMS

To evaluate the patients' satisfaction with breast reconstruction using the autologous latissimus dorsi technique and the impact of the procedure on the quality of life and body image of women who had mastectomy for breast cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective transversal study was conducted at the Georges François Leclerc Cancer Care Center in Dijon, France. From 1990 to 2008, 193 women underwent reconstruction (RW), among these, 141 were matched for age at diagnosis and the date of the mastectomy with women who did not undergo reconstruction (NRW) identified using data from the Côte d'Or breast cancer registry. Questionnaires concerning quality of life, body image and satisfaction (MBROS-S, MBROS-BI, EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-BR23) were sent through the post following surgery.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 77% and the mean (MBROS-S) satisfaction score was 3.36. The quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-BR23) in RW was no better than that in NRW, but body image was better (p = 0.0247) especially before 60 years (p = 0.0192), in obese patients (p = 0.03) and when the breasts of RW were heavy (p = 0.0197). Moreover, when the time from the mastectomy was less than 4 years, body image (p = 0.0008) and the sexual activity score (p = 0.0078) were higher in RW.

CONCLUSIONS

The level of satisfaction was higher in RW, and breast reconstruction made a strong contribution in terms of improvement in body image. A prospective study to evaluate quality of life in the long term is now necessary.