Familial clustering of giant congenital melanocytic nevi

Congenital melanocytic nevus syndrome: An association between congenital melanocytic nevi and neurological abnormalities

Congenital melanocytic nevus syndrome describes congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) associated with extracutaneous abnormalities, most often involving the nervous system. CMN syndrome is usually caused by postzygotic mutations in the neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog (NRAS) gene. CMN, collections of melanocytes within the skin, are typically multiple in number and serve as a visible, cutaneous marker of this syndrome. CMN can be classified by predicted maximum diameter in adulthood as well as other clinical features such as anatomic location, color heterogeneity, hypertrichosis, number of satellite nevi, nodules, and surface rugosity. Common neurological abnormalities in CMN syndrome include melanin with the central nervous system (CNS), seizures, and neurodevelopmental delays. Early screening magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the CNS during the initial months of life is crucial for predicting the risk of neurodevelopmental abnormalities, seizures, and the need for neurosurgical intervention. Children with a normal screening CNS MRI or intraparenchymal melanosis alone tend to have favorable outcomes. Prognosis otherwise varies widely given the breadth of neurological abnormalities that can occur in CMN syndrome, however if primary melanoma develops in the skin or CNS then outcomes are typically poor.

Analyzing the Spatial Randomness in the Distribution of Acquired Melanocytic Neoplasms

On the basis of the clinical impression and current knowledge, acquired melanocytic nevi and melanomas may not occur in random localizations. The goal of this study was to identify whether their distribution on the back is random and whether the location of melanoma correlates with its adjacent lesions. Therefore, patient-level and lesion-level spatial analyses were performed using the Clark‒Evans test for complete spatial randomness. A total of 311 patients with three-dimensional total body photography (average age of 40.08 [30‒49] years; male/female ratio: 128/183) with 5,108 eligible lesions in total were included in the study (mean sum of eligible lesions per patient of 16.42 [3‒199]). The patient-level analysis revealed that the distributions of acquired melanocytic neoplasms were more likely to deviate toward clustering than dispersion (average z-score of ‒0.55 [95% confidence interval = ‒0.69 to ‒0.41; P < 0.001]). The lesion-level analysis indicated a higher portion of melanomas (n = 57 of 72, 79.2% [95% confidence interval = 69.4‒88.9%]) appearing in proximity to neighboring melanocytic neoplasms than to nevi (n = 2,281 of 5,036, 45.3% [95% confidence interval = 43.9‒46.7%]). In conclusion, the nevi and melanomas' distribution on the back tends toward clustering as opposed to dispersion. Furthermore, melanomas are more likely to appear proximally to their neighboring neoplasms than to nevi. These findings may justify various oncogenic theories and improve diagnostic methodology.

Melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) genotypes do not correlate with size in two cohorts of medium-to-giant congenital melanocytic nevi

Congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) are cutaneous malformations whose prevalence is inversely correlated with projected adult size. CMN are caused by somatic mutations, but epidemiological studies suggest that germline genetic factors may influence CMN development. In CMN patients from the U.K., genetic variants in MC1R, such as p.V92M and loss-of-function variants, have been previously associated with larger CMN. We analyzed the association of MC1R variants with CMN characteristics in two distinct cohorts of medium-to-giant CMN patients from Spain (N = 113) and from France, Norway, Canada, and the United States (N = 53), similar at the clinical and phenotypical level except for the number of nevi per patient. We found that the p.V92M or loss-of-function MC1R variants either alone or in combination did not correlate with CMN size, in contrast to the U.K. CMN patients. An additional case-control analysis with 259 unaffected Spanish individuals showed a higher frequency of MC1R compound heterozygous or homozygous variant genotypes in Spanish CMN patients compared to the control population (15.9% vs. 9.3%; p = .075). Altogether, this study suggests that MC1R variants are not associated with CMN size in these non-UK cohorts. Additional studies are required to define the potential role of MC1R as a risk factor in CMN development.

Does the gene matter? Genotype-phenotype and genotype-outcome associations in congenital melanocytic naevi

Background

Genotype–phenotype studies can identify subgroups of patients with specific clinical features or differing outcomes, which can help shape management.

Objectives

To characterize the frequency of different causative genotypes in congenital melanocytic naevi (CMN), and to investigate genotype–phenotype and genotype–outcome associations.

Methods

We conducted a large cohort study in which we undertook MC1R genotyping from blood, and high‐sensitivity genotyping of NRAS and BRAF hotspots in 156 naevus biopsies from 134 patients with CMN [male 40%; multiple CMN 76%; projected adult size (PAS) > 20 cm, 59%].

Results

Mosaic NRAS mutations were detected in 68%, mutually exclusive with BRAF mutations in 7%, with double wild‐type in 25%. Two separate naevi were sequenced in five of seven patients with BRAF mutations, confirming clonality. Five of seven patients with BRAF mutations had a dramatic multinodular phenotype, with characteristic histology distinct from classical proliferative nodules. NRAS mutation was the commonest in all sizes of CMN, but was particularly common in naevi with PAS > 60 cm, implying more tolerance to that mutation early in embryogenesis. Facial features were less common in double wild‐type patients. Importantly, the incidence of congenital neurological disease, and apparently of melanoma, was not altered by genotype; no cases of melanoma were seen in BRAF‐mutant multiple CMN, however, this genotype is rare.

Conclusions

CMN of all sizes are most commonly caused by mutations in NRAS. BRAF is confirmed as a much rarer cause of multiple CMN, and appears to be commonly associated with a multinodular phenotype. Genotype in this cohort was not associated with differences in incidence of neurological disease in childhood. However, genotyping should be undertaken in suspected melanoma, for guidance of treatment.

What's already known about this topic?

Multiple congenital melanocytic naevi (CMN) have been shown to be caused by NRAS mosaic mutations in 70–80% of cases, by BRAF mosaicism in one case report and by inference in some previous cases.

There has been debate about genotypic association with different sizes of CMN, and no data on genotype–outcome.

What does this study add?

NRAS mosaicism was found in 68%, BRAF in 7% and double wild‐type in 25% of cases of CMN.

NRAS was the commonest mutation in all sizes of CMN, but was nearly universal in projected adult size > 60 cm.

BRAF is often associated with a distinct multinodular clinical/histological phenotype.

Adverse outcomes did not differ between genotypes on current numbers.

https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18747 available online

Melanoma arising in a Giant congenital melanocytic nevus: two case reports

Background

A giant congenital melanocytic nevus (GCMN) is found in 0.1% of live-born infants. If present, the lesion has a chance of about 6% to develop into malignant melanoma. Both children and adults can be affected by malignant melanoma arising in a giant congenital nevus. Up to 95% of GCMNs harbor NRAS mutations, and mutations in the BRAF, MC1R, TP53, and GNAQ genes have also been described. The individualization of therapy is required, but diagnostic and prognostic criteria remain controversial.

Case presentations

We report two cases: 1) melanoma arising in a giant congenital nevus during the first month of life complicated with neurocutaneous melanosis (NCM), and 2) melanoma arising in a giant congenital nevus during the first 6 months of life. Pathology, immunohistochemistry, and genetic analyses of tumor tissue were performed. The first case revealed only a non-pathogenic P72R polymorphism of the TP53 gene in the homozygote condition. For the second case, a Q61K mutation was detected in the NRAS gene.

Conclusion

Malignant melanoma associated with GCMN is rare and therefore poorly understood. Outcomes have been linked to the stage at diagnosis, but no additional pathological prognostic factors have been identified. The most frequent genetic event in giant CMNs is NRAS mutations, which was discovered in one of our cases. To accumulate evidence to improve disease prognosis and outcomes, children with congenital melanocytic nevus should be included in a systemic follow-up study from birth.

Neurocutaneous melanosis presenting with hydrocephalus and malignant transformation: case-based update

INTRODUCTION

Neurocutaneous melanosis (NCM) is a sporadic condition characterised by congenital melanocytic nevi and melanocytic thickening of the leptomeninges. It is believed to result from congenital dysplasia of melanin-producing cells within the skin and leptomeninges. The management of cutaneous manifestations remains controversial; for neurological manifestations, outcome remains poor even with the use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We describe the case of a 5-month-old boy who presented with giant congenital melanocytic nevus and hydrocephalus. MR imaging and CSF immunohistochemistry confirmed leptomeningeal melanosis. We discuss the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of this rare disorder in the light of recent published literature.

RESULTS

Patient required placement of right-sided ventriculoperitoneal shunt to control hydrocephalus. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was discharged home with normal neurological function. A presumptive diagnosis of NCM was made based on the MR characteristics, CSF cytology and clinical presentation. He received trametinib, a MAPK/Erk kinase inhibitor for 7 months. At 30 months of age, he developed left-sided weakness and status epilepticus requiring paediatric intensive care unit admission and ventilator support. The patient eventually succumbed to malignant transformation of leptomeningeal disease.

CONCLUSION

Cutaneous manifestations of NCM are usually congenital, and neurological manifestations develop early in life. Patients with large or multiple congenital nevi should therefore be investigated early to facilitate treatment. MR imaging is the investigation of choice which can further assist in performing biopsy. Symptomatic NCM is refractory to radiotherapy and chemotherapy and has a poor prognosis. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary in the management of NCM patients.

Acute Inhibition of MEK Suppresses Congenital Melanocytic Nevus Syndrome in a Murine Model Driven by Activated NRAS and Wnt Signaling

Congenital melanocytic nevus (CMN) syndrome is the association of pigmented melanocytic nevi with extra-cutaneous features, classically melanotic cells within the central nervous system, most frequently caused by a mutation of NRAS codon 61. This condition is currently untreatable and carries a significant risk of melanoma within the skin, brain, or leptomeninges. We have previously proposed a key role for Wnt signaling in the formation of melanocytic nevi, suggesting that activated Wnt signaling may be synergistic with activated NRAS in the pathogenesis of CMN syndrome. Some familial pre-disposition suggests a germ-line contribution to CMN syndrome, as does variability of neurological phenotypes in individuals with similar cutaneous phenotypes. Accordingly, we performed exome sequencing of germ-line DNA from patients with CMN to reveal rare or undescribed Wnt-signaling alterations. A murine model harboring activated NRAS(Q61K) and Wnt signaling in melanocytes exhibited striking features of CMN syndrome, in particular neurological involvement. In the first model of treatment for this condition, these congenital, and previously assumed permanent, features were profoundly suppressed by acute post-natal treatment with a MEK inhibitor. These data suggest that activated NRAS and aberrant Wnt signaling conspire to drive CMN syndrome. Post-natal MEK inhibition is a potential candidate therapy for patients with this debilitating condition.

Congenital melanocytic nevus: two clinicopathological forms

Congenital melanocytic nevus (CMN) is a hamartomatous disease for which many attempts at classification have been proposed. This disease is relevant not only because of its functional and esthetic implications but also because it is a well-documented precursor to malignant melanoma. We performed a clinical and pathological prospective study of 200 cases of CMN and were able to identify 2 different forms of CMN, each one with biological, clinical, and histopathological features and criteria that are consistent and repeatable. We propose to name them types I and II. Type I CMN is the most common, usually, if not always, a single lesion, it consists of a plaque that involves only 1 anatomic region and does not go beyond it; type I CNM grows in proportion to the growth of the child, melanoma rarely develops from it, and when it does it usually arises at the dermoepidermal junction. Its histopathology shows cords, strands, nests, and single units of melanocytes spreading between collagen bundles only in the dermis and frequently the epidermis too, but without trespassing to the hypodermis, that is, it is superficial. Type II CMN is always made up of many lesions, one of them being very large and surrounded by many lesions; histopathologically, it involves not only the skin but also deeper structures, sometimes bone and central nervous system; therefore, it is deep; when melanoma develops, it does in the dermal component and usually from the largest plaque. This type of CMN is the one that develops neurocutaneous melanocytosis. This system is not only easy and logical but it also has biologic advantages and the clinical-pathological correlation and criteria are repeatable by clinicians and pathologists.

Update on Molecular Pathology of Cutaneous Melanocytic Lesions: What is New in Diagnosis and Molecular Testing for Treatment?

In this article, we give an update on recent findings regarding molecular pathology in cutaneous melanocytic tumors. The focus lies on use of genetics in the diagnosis of distinct subtypes of spitzoid tumors that are often characterized by specific phenotypic–genotypic alterations that can frequently be recognized by adequate histological examination. Typical illustrating cases are given in order to increase recognition of these lesions in daily dermatopathology practice. New molecular findings in the pathogenesis of congenital melanocytic tumors and neurocutaneous melanosis are reviewed. In addition, use of mutation analysis in the differential diagnosis of melanoma metastasis is discussed. Finally, application of mutation analysis in targeted therapy in advanced melanoma with advantages of new techniques such as next generation sequencing is described.

Clonogenic cell subpopulations maintain congenital melanocytic nevi

Large congenital melanocytic nevi (lCMN) are benign melanocytic tumors associated with an increased risk of melanoma transformation. They result predominantly from a post-zygotic somatic NRAS mutation. These lesions persist and even increase after birth proportionally to the child's growth. Therefore, we asked here whether cells with clonogenic and tumorigenic properties persisted postnatally in lCMN. Subpopulations of lCMN cells expressed stem cell/progenitor lineage markers such as Sox10, Nestin, Oct4, and ABCB5. In vitro, 1 in 250 cells from fresh lCMN formed colonies that could be passaged and harbored the same NRAS mutation as the original nevus. In vivo, lCMN specimens xenografted in immunocompromised mice expanded 4-fold. BrdU(+)-proliferating and label-retaining melanocytes were found within the outgrowth skin tissue of these xenografts, which displayed the same benign nested architecture as the original nevus. lCMN cell suspensions were not able to expand when xenografted alone in Rag 2-/- mice. Conversely, when mixed with keratinocytes, these cells reconstituted the architecture of the human nevus with its characteristic melanocyte layout, lentiginous hyperplasia, and nested architecture. Overall, our data demonstrate that, after birth, certain lCMN cell subtypes still display features such as clonogenic potential and expand into nevus-like structures when cooperating with adjacent keratinocytes.

NRAS mutation is the sole recurrent somatic mutation in large congenital melanocytic nevi

Congenital melanocytic nevus (CMN) is a particular melanocytic in utero proliferation characterized by an increased risk of melanoma transformation during infancy or adulthood. NRAS and BRAF mutations have consistently been reported in CMN samples, but until recently results have been contradictory. We therefore studied a series of large and giant CMNs and compared them with small and medium CMNs using Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, high-resolution melting analysis, and mutation enrichment by an enhanced version of ice-COLD-PCR. Large-giant CMNs displayed NRAS mutations in 94.7% of cases (18/19). At that point, the role of additional mutations in CMN pathogenesis had to be investigated. We therefore performed exome sequencing on five specimens of large-giant nevi. The results showed that NRAS mutation was the sole recurrent somatic event found in such melanocytic proliferations. The genetic profile of small-medium CMNs was significantly different, with 70% of cases bearing NRAS mutations and 30% showing BRAF mutations. These findings strongly suggest that NRAS mutations are sufficient to drive melanocytic benign proliferations in utero.

Multiple congenital melanocytic nevi and neurocutaneous melanosis are caused by postzygotic mutations in codon 61 of NRAS

Congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) can be associated with neurological abnormalities and an increased risk of melanoma. Mutations in NRAS, BRAF, and Tp53 have been described in individual CMN samples; however, their role in the pathogenesis of multiple CMN within the same subject and development of associated features has not been clear. We hypothesized that a single postzygotic mutation in NRAS could be responsible for multiple CMN in the same individual, as well as for melanocytic and nonmelanocytic central nervous system (CNS) lesions. From 15 patients, 55 samples with multiple CMN were sequenced after site-directed mutagenesis and enzymatic digestion of the wild-type allele. Oncogenic missense mutations in codon 61 of NRAS were found in affected neurological and cutaneous tissues of 12 out of 15 patients, but were absent from unaffected tissues and blood, consistent with NRAS mutation mosaicism. In 10 patients, the mutation was consistently c.181C>A, p.Q61K, and in 2 patients c.182A>G, p.Q61R. All 11 non-melanocytic and melanocytic CNS samples from 5 patients were mutation positive, despite NRAS rarely being reported as mutated in CNS tumors. Loss of heterozygosity was associated with the onset of melanoma in two cases, implying a multistep progression to malignancy. These results suggest that single postzygotic NRAS mutations are responsible for multiple CMN and associated neurological lesions in the majority of cases.

Congenital melanocytic nevi: where are we now? Part I. Clinical presentation, epidemiology, pathogenesis, histology, malignant transformation, and neurocutaneous melanosis

Congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) are present at birth or arise during the first few weeks of life. They are quite common, may have a heritable component, and can present with marked differences in size, shape, color, and location. Histologic and dermatoscopic findings may help suggest the diagnosis, but they are not entirely specific. CMN are categorized based on size, and larger lesions can have a significant psychosocial impact and other complications. They are associated with a variety of dermatologic lesions, ranging from benign to malignant. The risk of malignant transformation varies, with larger CMN carrying a significantly higher risk of malignant melanoma (MM), although with an absolute risk that is lower than is commonly believed. They may also be associated with neuromelanosis, which may be of greater concern than cutaneous MM. The information presented herein aims to help dermatologists determine when it is prudent to obtain a biopsy specimen or excise these lesions, to obtain radiographic imaging, and to involve other specialists (eg, psychiatrists and neurologists) in the patient's care.

Germline melanocortin-1-receptor genotype is associated with severity of cutaneous phenotype in congenital melanocytic nevi: a role for MC1R in human fetal development

Congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) are pigmented birthmarks that affect up to 80% of the skin surface area. The increased frequency of CMN in families of severely affected individuals is suggestive of a predisposing germline genotype. We noted a high prevalence of red hair in affected families, and considered a role for MC1R in this condition. A cohort of 166 CMN subjects underwent pigmentary phenotyping, with MC1R genotyping in 113. Results were compared with a local control group of 60 unrelated children and with 300 UK children without CMN. CMN subjects had higher prevalences of red hair and a red-haired parent than local controls and had a higher rate of compound heterozygosity and homozygosity for MC1R variants. The presence of a V92M or R allele (D84E, R151C, R160W, D294H) was associated with increasing size of the CMN, implying a growth-promoting effect of these alleles. Unexpectedly, the V92M and R151C alleles were also strongly associated with birth weight in the CMN cohort, a finding confirmed in the control group. The effect of germline MC1R genotype on development and severity of CMN led us to investigate potential broader effects on growth, revealing a role for MC1R in normal fetal development.

The face in congenital melanocytic nevus syndrome

Congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) are known to be associated with neurological abnormalities and melanoma, but have not been considered to be part of a developmental syndrome. The objective of this study was to test our clinical observation that children with CMN show more facial similarities than might be expected by coincidence. We selected facial photographs of 95 white Caucasian children with CMN from our database only on the basis of good neutral views, allowing careful evaluation of facial morphology. These were scored independently by two clinical geneticists using standardized categories and definitions for facial morphology. Prevalence of age-independent features was compared to established norms in a large population, and associations with cutaneous phenotype were investigated. CMN were found to be associated with characteristic facies, and 74% of children in this series had at least three typical features. The characteristic features were: wide or prominent forehead, apparent hypertelorism, eyebrow variants, periorbital fullness, small/short nose, narrow nasal ridge, broad nasal tip, broad or round face, full cheeks, prominent pre-maxilla, prominent/long philtrum, and everted lower lip. No association was found with the severity of cutaneous phenotype. We conclude that children with CMN often have a characteristic face. We propose the term "congenital melanocytic nevus syndrome" to describe this association.

Prevalence and characteristics of choroidal nevi: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence of choroidal nevi in 4 racial or ethnic groups (white, black, Hispanic, and Chinese) in the United States.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants of the second examination of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), involving 6176 persons 44 to 84 years of age without clinical cardiovascular disease at baseline selected from 6 United States communities.

METHODS

Fundus images were taken using a 45° digital camera through dark-adapted pupils and were graded for choroidal nevi using the modified Wisconsin Age-Related Maculopathy Grading System and the Blue Mountains Eye Study protocol.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Choroidal nevi.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of choroidal nevi in the whole cohort was 2.1%, with prevalences higher in whites (4.1%) than blacks (0.7%), Hispanics (1.2%), and Chinese (0.4%; P<0.001 for any differences among groups). The lowest prevalence of choroidal nevi occurred in those 75 to 84 years of age. The nevi were subfoveal in 4% of eyes with nevi and were not associated with a decrease in visual acuity. Characteristics of the nevi (size, shape, location, color, drusen on surface) did not differ among racial or ethnic groups. With the exception of associations with higher C-reactive protein levels (odds ratio [OR] per mg/dl on the logarithmic scale, 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.43; P = 0.01) and lower systolic blood pressure (OR per 10 mmHg, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.99; P = 0.04), choroidal nevi were not associated with other potential risk factors (e.g., gender, smoking status, alcohol consumption, lipid levels, coagulation factors, or kidney disease).

CONCLUSIONS

Low prevalences of choroidal nevi were found in the 4 groups participating in the MESA cohort, with whites having higher prevalence than the other racial or ethnic groups. The higher prevalence in whites than in other groups was not explained by any of the factors studied. When choroidal nevi were present, their characteristics did not differ among racial or ethnic groups.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.