Use of botulinum toxin type A to improve treatment of facial wounds: a prospective randomised study

Dose-Dependent Effects of Botulinum Toxin Type A on Prevention of Postoperative Scars in Various Regions in the Body: A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) can improve wound healing and reduce scar formation; however, the exact dose required to prevent postoperative scarring across various anatomical sites remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and optimal concentrations of BTXA for preventing postoperative scarring across various common surgical sites throughout the body.

METHODS

In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 46 patients with benign skin tumors received injections of 1, 2.5, or 5 U/0.1 mL of BTXA or 0.9% saline immediately following surgical tumor excision on both sides of the incisions. Follow-ups were conducted at 7 days, 15 days, and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Patient-reported adverse events and standardized digital photographs were collected. Scar formation was assessed using the modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (mSBSES).

RESULTS

All 46 patients completed the trial without severe complications. The mSBSES scores were higher in the experimental groups at all follow-ups. The 5 U/0.1 mL BTXA dose group demonstrated optimal scar prevention at all high-risk sites for scar hyperplasia. No significant difference was observed between the 2.5 U/0.1 mL and 5 U/0.1 mL doses for intermediate-risk sites, while 1 U/0.1 mL dose was sufficient for low-risk sites. Overall, 86.5% of patients were satisfied with their treatments, with 16.3% being very satisfied.

CONCLUSIONS

Early postoperative BTXA injection can reduce or prevent hypertrophic scarring, with optimal doses ranging from 1 to 5 U/0.1 mL depending on the surgical site, supporting broader clinical application of BTXA. The effectiveness of different concentrations of botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) in preventing postoperative scarring was compared, expanding the scope of previous research, which focused only on the head, face, and neck regions, to include the trunk and extremity areas. Different optimal injection strategies were determined based on different surgical sites and their risks of developing hypertrophic scars. The study demonstrates that BTXA not only reduces scar formation but also enhances patient satisfaction and reduces postoperative itching and pain, contributing to overall better postoperative outcomes. By establishing the efficacy and optimal dosing of BTXA for various surgical sites, this research supports the potential for broader clinical application of BTXA in aesthetic and reconstructive surgeries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Surgical site infection and patient-reported outcomes in surgically treated soft tissue facial injury: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue facial injuries (STFI) constitute a huge portion of craniofacial trauma, but the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following surgical management of STFI are unknown.

METHODS

A PRISMA-compliant search was conducted from January 1990 until March 2023, and meta-analysis was performed using R. Pooled effects of the outcomes were estimated using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model or generalised linear mixed model, when feasible.

RESULT

Among the 8897 screened studies, 38 were included. Twelve studies reported PROMs (n = 985), whereas 28 studies reported SSI rates (n = 10,996) following operative treatment for STFI. The pooled SSI rate (n = 28) was 3.30 % (95 % CI 1.89 %-5.71 %). Surgical and non-surgical closure did not differ significantly in SSI rate. PROs focused on scar outcomes, cosmetic outcomes, quality of life and psychological impact. Subgroup analysis showed lower SSI risk in operative repair for general facial trauma compared to primary repair, and in general facial trauma compared to other aetiologies. The pooled patient scar assessment scale, score at 6-12 months post-intervention (5 studies, n = 217) was 16.16 (95 % CI 15.34-16.97). Limited evidence is available on the effect and superiority of surgical treatment in cosmetic outcomes, quality of life and psychological impact.

CONCLUSION

Our findings emphasise the limited and unreliable evidence available on PROs following operative treatment for STFI. Future studies employing robust methodologies are needed to investigate optimal approaches for managing STFI.

Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin-A on Face, Head, and Neck Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Botulinum toxin A (BTA) temporarily paralyzes nearby muscles to reduce tension in wound sites, inhibiting scar hyperplasia. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of BTA injection on scar formation and quality in various face, head, and neck sites. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across four electronic databases and registries to identify relevant studies. We assessed the following outcomes: visual analog scale (VAS), Vancouver scar scale (VSS), scar width, patient self-assessment scale, Stony Brook scar evaluation scales, Observer scar assessment scale, Manchester scar scale, and patient scar-assessment scale. Results: This systematic review included 20 studies encompassing 894 patients, of which, 18 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. The VAS and VSS significantly improved with BTA compared to controls which significantly reduced scar width at the first and second measurement points compared to controls. Subgroup analyses revealed that BTA had better upper lip and forehead outcomes. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that scars of the face, head, and neck were improved with BTA treatment compared to controls. This highlights the need for further study, especially concentrating on the upper lip and forehead regions, where improved outcomes were identified on subgroup analysis.

Evaluation of the Effect of Botulinum Toxin A on the Lymphatic Endothelial Cells

INTRODUCTION

Botulinum toxin A (BoTA) is a neurotoxin formed by Clostridium botulinum, with a broad medical application spectrum. While the primary effect of BoTA is on the muscles, the effects of BoTA in other systems including the blood vasculature have already been examined, revealing unexpected actions. However, no studies exist to the best of our knowledge regarding the potential effects of BoTA on the lymphatic vascular system, possessing a critical role in health and disease. Isolated human lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) were cultured in dedicated in vitro culture systems. The analysis including imaging and cell culture approaches as well as molecular biology techniques is performed to examine the LEC alterations occurring upon exposure to different concentrations of BoTA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Human LECs were cultured and expanded on collagen-coated petri dishes using endothelial basal medium and the commercial product Botox from Allergan as used for all our experiments. Harvested cells were used in various in vitro functional tests to assess the morphologic and functional properties of the BoTA-treated LECs. Gene expression analysis was performed to assess the most important lymphatic system-related genes and pathways.

RESULTS

Concentrations of 1, 5 or 10 U of BoTA did not demonstrate a significant effect regarding the proliferation and migration capacity of the LECs versus untreated controls. Interestingly, even the smallest BoTA dose was found to significantly decrease the cord-like-structure formation capacity of the seeded LECs. Gene expression analysis was used to underpin possible molecular alterations, suggesting no significant effect of BoTA in the modification of gene expression versus the starvation medium control.

CONCLUSION

LECs appear largely unaffected to BoTA treatment, with an isolated effect on the cord-like-structure formation capacity. Further work needs to assess the effect of BoTA on the smooth-muscle-cell-covered collecting lymphatic vessels and the possible aesthetic implications of such an effect, due to edema formation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Five decades of the use of botulinum toxin in ophthalmology

Botulinum toxin (BoNT) has been known for over 50 years. It has conquered many areas of medicine and has become indispensable in contemporary medicine. Now, BoNT is used to treat at least 26 conditions in six medical specialties. Although the use of BoNT began in strabology, it became the gold standard for many ophthalmologic pathologies. The present review of the literature focuses on the use of BoNT in ophthalmology and treatment of the following conditions: blepharospasm, facial hemispasm, facial palsy, spastic entropion, strabismus, endocrine orbitopathy, convergence spasm, and facial trauma. We conclude that nearly half a century of experience in utilizing BoNT in ophthalmology ensured a satisfactory level of effectiveness and safety for patients with many pathologies. Areas of future research include the application of BoNT in new selected indications, the development of the route of application without injections, and the development of long-acting BoNT forms for patients who require repeated long-term treatment.

Pharmacotherapy for Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars

Keloids (KD) and hypertrophic scars (HTS), which are quite raised and pigmented and have increased vascularization and cellularity, are formed due to the impaired healing process of cutaneous injuries in some individuals having family history and genetic factors. These scars decrease the quality of life (QOL) of patients greatly, due to the pain, itching, contracture, cosmetic problems, and so on, depending on the location of the scars. Treatment/prevention that will satisfy patients' QOL is still under development. In this article, we review pharmacotherapy for treating KD and HTS, including the prevention of postsurgical recurrence (especially KD). Pharmacotherapy involves monotherapy using a single drug and combination pharmacotherapy using multiple drugs, where drugs are administered orally, topically and/or through intralesional injection. In addition, pharmacotherapy for KD/HTS is sometimes combined with surgical excision and/or with physical therapy such as cryotherapy, laser therapy, radiotherapy including brachytherapy, and silicone gel/sheeting. The results regarding the clinical effectiveness of each mono-pharmacotherapy for KD/HTS are not always consistent but rather scattered among researchers. Multimodal combination pharmacotherapy that targets multiple sites simultaneously is more effective than mono-pharmacotherapy. The literature was searched using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Online search engines.

Hyperdiluted Botulinum Toxin and Intense Pulsed Light Treatment: A Case Series to Illustrate a Novel Protocol for Hypertrophic Scar Reduction

Hypertrophic scars can have significant and far-reaching effects on patients that range from itching to creating difficulty with mobility, all of which can negatively impact the individual's quality of life. A recent study showed that many patients with recent scars report pain, burning, pruritus, erythema, in combination with psychological difficulties that impact bodily movement, choice of clothing, and participation in leisure activities. Botulinum toxin Type A (BoNTA) and intense pulsed light (IPL) have shown promise in treating such scars. We propose a novel treatment protocol involving a 4-week intervention with hyperdiluted BoNTA injections and supplemental treatment with IPL for erythema, and a 6-month scar scale assessment and photographic documentation that occurs before and 6 months after treatment. We report four cases where using hyperdiluted BoNTA, either alone or in conjunction with IPL, substantially reduced scar size, improved overall scar appearance, and diminished erythema in areas on the face and the breasts. Although this report suggests that a schedule of alternating treatments with BoNTA and IPL may be beneficial in reducing scar size and enhancing appearance, further research is necessary to better understand the most effective dosages, the relationship between BoNTA and IPL, and the optimal management of scarring.

Early postoperative interventions in the prevention and management of thyroidectomy scars

Thyroidectomy scars, located on the exposed site, can cause distress in patients. Owing to the cosmetic importance of thyroidectomy scars, many studies have been conducted on its prevention and treatment. Scar formation factors mainly include inflammatory cell infiltration, angiogenesis, fibroblast proliferation, secretion of cytokines such as transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, and mechanical tension on the wound edges. Anti-scar methods including topical anti-scar agents, skin tension-bearing devices, and local injections of botulinum toxin, as well as lasers and phototherapies, that target these scar formation factors have been developed. However, current studies remain fragmented, and there is a lack of a comprehensive evaluation of the impacts of these anti-scar methods on treating thyroidectomy scars. Early intervention is a crucial but often neglected key to control hyperplastic thyroidectomy scars. Therefore, we review the currently adopted early postoperative strategies for thyroidectomy scar reduction, aiming to illustrate the mechanism of these anti-scar methods and provide flexible and comprehensive treatment selections for clinical physicians to deal with thyroidectomy scars.

Experimental study on the effect and mechanism of adipose stem cell-derived exosomes combined with botulinum toxin A on skin trauma in rats

BACKGROUND

Adipose stem cell-derived exosomes (ADSC-EXO) and botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) individually showed a therapeutic effect on skin wound repair.

AIMS

This study investigated their synergistic effect on promoting skin wound healing in vitro and in vivo and the underlying molecular events.

METHODS

ADSCs were isolated from Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats to obtain ADSC-EXO by ultrafiltration and ultracentrifugation and were confirmed using nanoparticle tracking analysis and transmission electron microscopy. Human skin fibroblasts (HSF) were cultured and treated with or without ADSC-EXO, BTX-A, or their combination. Changes in cell phenotypes and protein expression were analyzed using different in vitro assays, and a rat skin wound model was used to assess their in vivo effects.

RESULTS

The isolated ADSC-EXO from primarily cultured ADSCs had a circular vesicle shape with a 30-180 nm diameter. Treatment of HSF with ADSC-EXO and/or BTX-A significantly accelerated HSF migration in vitro and skin wound healing in a rat model. Moreover, ADSC-EXO plus BTX-A treatment dramatically induced VEGFA expression but reduced COL III and COL I levels in vivo. ADSC-EXO and/or BTX-A treatment significantly upregulated TGF-β3 expression on Day 16 after surgery but downregulated TGF-β1 expression, suggesting that ADSC-EXO plus BTX-A promoted skin wound healing and reduced inflammatory cell infiltration.

CONCLUSIONS

The ADSC-EXO plus BTX-A treatment demonstrated a synergistic effect on skin wound healing through upregulation of VEGF expression and the TGF-β3/TGF-β1 and COL III/COL I ratio.

Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Prevention of Post-Mastectomy Scar in Transmen: A Prospective, Randomized Study

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous mastectomies in transmen have been gaining popularity. However, post-operative scars are an inevitable consequence. Recently, Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) has shown positive effects in scar prevention. The objective of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of BoNT-A in scar prevention.

METHODS

Fifteen patients who had undergone subcutaneous mastectomy were included. At 14 days post-surgery, either incoBoNT-A or a placebo was injected into the scar on each side. The primary outcome assessment measured the scar's severity using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). The secondary outcome assessment evaluated the scar's color using a standard measurement device. Outcome assessments were conducted until 6 months post-surgery.

RESULTS

There were significantly lower VSS scores in the BoNT-A group compared to the placebo at the end of the study (7.43 ± 0.26 vs. 8.82 ± 0.26, p < 0.001). The objective assessment revealed a statistically significant decrease in redness values in the BoNT-A group compared to the placebo at 3 and 6 months.

CONCLUSION

BoNT-A has demonstrated effectiveness in scar prevention by reducing the severity of postoperative scar formation and improving overall scar appearance.

Current and Future Developments in Wound Healing

Poor wound healing on the face and neck can lead to significant morbidity and dissatisfaction in facial plastic surgery. With current advances in wound healing management and commercially available biologic and tissue-engineered products, there are several options available to optimize acute wound healing and treat delayed or chronic wounds. This article summarizes some of the key principals and recent developments in wound healing research in addition to potential future advancements in the field of soft tissue wound healing.

Combination of W-plasty and Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A Injection for Preventing Rhytidectomy Scar in Asians

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to see if better scar results could be obtained by administering botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNTA) injection and W-plasty incision for preventing rhytidectomy scar.

METHODS

All patients underwent extended deep-plane rhytidectomy in two groups. Group 1 had a straight incision line, and BoNTA was not given. Group 2 was injected with W-plasty and BoNTA. Photos were taken before surgery and twelve months after surgery. Two aesthetic surgeons analyzed the results using MSS, MSRS, and SBSES. Interrater reliability was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients were included in the study. Group 1 (Straight incision, No BoNTA) had 26, and Group 2 (W-plasty, BoNTA) had 23 patients. The interrater reliability in Group 1 was excellent for MSS (ICC, 0.957 [0.904-0.981]), and good in two of the interrater reliability measures (ICCs, 0.897 [0.769-0.954] for MSRS, and 0.821 [0.605-0.919] for SBSES). Interrater reliability in Group 2 was good in two out of three measures (ICCs, 0.760 [0.423-0.899] for MSS, 0.746 [0.392-0.893] for MSRS, and 0.851 [0.654-0.937] for SBSES). There was a significant statistical difference between Group 1 and Group 2, showing that Group 2 has superior outcomes (MSS, 6.596 ± 1.569 vs. 5.435 ± 0.590, P = 0.001; MSRS, 4.346 ± 0.967 vs. 3.652 ± 0.510, P = 0.003; SBSES, 3.788 ± 0.695 vs. 4.261 ± 0.541, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Analyzed by three dedicated scar assessments, better results were obtained through combining W-plasty and BoNTA injections, so it is expected to be a useful method for improving scars.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Botulinum toxin A in dentistry and orofacial surgery: an evidence-based review - part 1: therapeutic applications

Objective An evidence-based review on the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type-A (BoNTA) in orofacial conditions, focusing on the therapeutic applications and role of BoNTA as an adjuvant treatment.Data source and selection Data was collected using PubMed (Medline), Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials electronic databases. Having satisfied the search parameters, 32 studies for therapeutic applications and 26 for BoNTA as an adjunctive treatment were included. The quality of relevant studies was assessed using the Best Evidence Topics (BETs) Critical Appraisal Tool.Data extraction The highest level of evidence (LOE) behind BoNTA safety and efficacy was for wound healing and scar management in the orofacial surgery context, where BoNTA was presented as an adjunctive modality. Level-I evidence was controversial for temporomandibular disorders and bruxism. However, it showed promising results for painful temporomandibular disorders of myogenic origin refractory to conservative therapies, and to decrease muscle contraction intensity in sleeping bruxism. There was only one level-II study for persistent recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Data showed limited level-III evidence for orofacial pain conditions (temporomandibular joint recurrent dislocation and pain, burning mouth syndrome or atypical odontalgia), oral cancer complications, or as an adjuvant to maxillofacial and orthognathic surgeries. Benefits of BoNTA in prosthodontics had weak level-IV evidence. No evidence was found among the periodontology field.Conclusion There is growing evidence to support the safety and efficacy of BoNTA in the investigated orofacial pathological conditions, with high levels of satisfaction from the patient and clinician perspective. However, there are some inconsistencies and limited high-quality evidence available. Well-designed controlled clinical trials are necessary to evaluate long-term safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness before BoNTA is widely adopted with irrefutable evidence-based clinical guidelines.

Toxicology and pharmacology of botulinum and tetanus neurotoxins: an update

Tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins cause the neuroparalytic syndromes of tetanus and botulism, respectively, by delivering inside different types of neurons, metalloproteases specifically cleaving the SNARE proteins that are essential for the release of neurotransmitters. Research on their mechanism of action is intensively carried out in order to devise improved therapies based on antibodies and chemical drugs. Recently, major results have been obtained with human monoclonal antibodies and with single chain antibodies that have allowed one to neutralize the metalloprotease activity of botulinum neurotoxin type A1 inside neurons. In addition, a method has been devised to induce a rapid molecular evolution of the metalloprotease domain of botulinum neurotoxin followed by selection driven to re-target the metalloprotease activity versus novel targets with respect to the SNARE proteins. At the same time, an intense and wide spectrum clinical research on novel therapeutics based on botulinum neurotoxins is carried out, which are also reviewed here.

A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis: Botulinum Toxin A Effect on Postoperative Facial Scar Prevention

BACKGROUND

Postoperative facial scarring can be a significant psychological burden for patients to carry after surgery, often resulting in prolonged mental health dysfunction. Currently, there is no established method to prevent facial scar formation; however, there are several methods to prevent facial scar hyperplasia and improve scar quality. Botulinum toxin A (BTA) has been widely used due to its properties of muscle paralysis and known success in plastic surgery and cosmetology. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of BTA in preventing postoperative facial scar hyperplasia and improving scar quality.

METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, web of science, and Cochrane libraries were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (published before May 2021) wherein BTA was used for the treatment of facial scars. The efficacy and safety of BTA were evaluated by the following scales: the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS), Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS), and Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES); the BTA effect on scar width and complications was also assessed.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs involving 114 cases were included. Through quantitative analysis, the BTA injection group had a higher VAS score, lower VSS score, lower OSAS score, and smaller scar width. However, no significant difference was noted in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrated that BTA can safely improve the appearance of postoperative facial scars by significantly inhibiting scar hyperplasia and improving scar quality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A for postoperative scar prevention and wound healing improvement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) has shown underlying effects for wound healing improvement. New small clinical trials keep emerging every year and updated evidence-based information is warranted. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BTXA for preventing scarring.

METHODS

Four databases were searched to recruit randomized clinical trials (RCTs) which compared the surgical wounds treated with BTXA vs. those treated with placebo or blank control. The outcomes were primarily quantified by measures including the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scales (SBSES), modified SBSES (mSBSES), and scar width. Patients' satisfaction and adverse events were also reported.

RESULTS

In total, 16 RCTs involving 671 cases (510 patients) were included. The outcome showed significant superiority of BTXA in VSS (mean difference [MD] = -1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.00 to -0.65, p = 0.0001), VAS (MD = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.05-1.52, p < 0.00001), SBSES or mSBSES (MD = -0.18, 95% CI: -0.27 to -0.10, p < 0.0001), scar width (MD = -0.18, 95% CI: -0.27 to -0.10, p < 0.0001), and patients' satisfaction (risk ratio [RR] = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.06-1.49, p = 0.01). No significant difference of adverse events incidence was observed (RR = 1.46 95% CI: 0.64-3.33, p = 0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Botulinum toxin type A is effective and safe for postoperative scar prevention and wound healing improvement, especially for facial wounds of Asians. Further studies should manage to standardize the treatment algorithm, while mSBSES is recommended for scar assessment.

The Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Injections in Preventing Postoperative Scars and Improving Scar Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Scars exposed on the body surface lead to a large psychological burden on patients. However, no satisfactory scar treatments exist. Botulinum toxin type A is a neurotoxin that has been widely applied in the plastic and cosmetic surgery field. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin in scar management.

METHODS

PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy of botulinum toxin injections in preventing postoperative scars and improving scars quality and were published prior to Dec. 29, 2020. The outcome indicators were the visual analog scale score, Vancouver scar scale score, Stony Brook scar evaluation scales score, scar width, patient self-assessment results, and complications.

RESULTS

Seventeen randomized controlled trials with a total of 633 cases were identified in this meta-analysis. The quantitative synthesis results showed that compared with the control group, the botulinum toxin group had a significantly lower VSS score (MD = -0.97, 95%CI = -1.56 to -0.39, p = 0.001), higher VAS score (MD = 1.26, 95%CI = 1.04 to 1.47, p < 0.00001), thinner scar width (MD = -0.25, 95%CI = -0.37 to -0.12, p < 0.0001) and higher patient satisfaction (RR = 3.38 95%CI = 1.45 to 7.89, p = 0.005). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the number of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrated that botulinum toxin injections can significantly improve cosmetic appearance and postoperative scar quality. At the therapeutic dose, no significant complications were observed, indicating that botulinum toxin injections are safe.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Utilities of Botulinum Toxins in Dermatology and Cosmetology

Botulinum toxin (BoNT) is a neurotoxin produced by the Clostridium botulinum bacterium with a well-known efficacy and safety profile in the focal idiopathic hyperhidrosis treatment. BoNT comprises seven different neurotoxins; however, only toxins A and B are clinically employed. BoNT is lately practiced in off-label therapies for a variety of skin diseases. Scar prevention, hyperhidrosis, rhytides, eccrine nevus, alopecia, psoriasis, Darier disease, bullous skin disease, pompholyx and Raynaud's phenomenon are some of the novel indications for BoNT in cosmetic and notably non-cosmetic aspects of dermatology. To employ BoNT correctly in clinical practice, we must have a thorough understanding of the functional anatomy of the mimetic muscles. An intensive literature search was conducted to update all dermatology-oriented experiments and clinical trials on the described element of BoNT for this general overview of BoNT use in dermatology. This review aims to analyse the role of BoNT in dermatology and cosmetology.

Combination Treatment of Intra/Perilesional Botulinum Toxin-A Injection and Ablative Fractional Laser for Better Clinical Outcomes of Hypertrophic Fibrotic Thyroidectomy Scars Following Fractional Ablative Laser Resurfacing

BACKGROUND

Recent reports have shown that intralesional botulinum toxin type-A (BTX-A) works on scar cosmesis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of combination treatment of laser and BTX-A injection and compare the effects of conventional intralesional injection and intra- and perilesional BTX-A injection on fibrotic thyroidectomy scars.

METHODS

Patients with fibrotic thyroidectomy scars showing insufficient responses to previous ablative fractional laser (AFL) treatment were enrolled. Combination treatment with AFL and BTX-A injection was performed. Patients who received intra/perilesional BTX-A injections were classified into group A. Group B was patients in whom the injection was performed only intralesionally. The improvement was assessed based on the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS).

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients was included. Statistically significant improvement in pliability and total VSS score after the combination treatment were observed in overall patient group. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that pliability, height, and total VSS improved significantly in group A. In group B, only pliability significantly improved.

CONCLUSION

BTX-A injection combined with AFL can provide better relief for the previously treated fibrotic thyroidectomy scars. Injection of BTX-A not only into the scar itself, but also into perilesional muscles that can exert tension on the scar site may provide additional benefit in flattening scar height.

Non-invasive Intrauterine Administration of Botulinum Toxin A Enhances Endometrial Angiogenesis and Improves the Rates of Embryo Implantation

Endometrial angiogenesis plays crucial roles in determining the endometrial receptivity. Defects in endometrial receptivity often cause repeated implantation failure, which is one of the major unmet needs for infertility and contributes a major barrier to the assisted reproductive technology. Despite the numerous extensive research work, there are currently no effective evidence-based treatments to prevent or cure this condition. As a non-invasive treatment strategy, botulinum toxin A (BoTA) was administered into one side of mouse uterine horns, and saline was infused into the other side of horns for the control. Impact of BoTA was assessed in the endometrium at 3 or 8 days after infusion. We demonstrated that BoTA administration enhances the capacity of endothelial cell tube formation and sprouting. The intrauterine BoTA administration significantly induced endometrial angiogenesis displaying increased numbers of vessel formation and expression levels of related marker genes. Moreover, BoTA intrauterine application promoted the endometrial receptivity, and the rates of embryo implantation were improved with BoTA treatment with no morphologically retarded embryos. Intrauterine BoTA treatment has a beneficial effect on vascular reconstruction of functional endometrium prior to embryo implantation by increasing endometrial blood flow near the uterine cavity suggesting BoTA treatment as a potential therapeutic strategy for patients who are suffering from repeated implantation failure with the problems with endometrial receptivity.

Potentialities of botulinum therapy in cosmetology

The desire to maintain youth as long as it possible in modern society, especially among women of working age, is primarily due to the desire to be in demand, well-groomed and attractive. Currently, there are 5 main methods that contribute to improving the condition of the skin of the face, namely: the method using professional cosmetics, chemical peels, mesotherapy, treatment with an injection of botulinum toxin type A (BTA) and intradermal implants based on hyaluronic acid. The aim of the literature review was to analyze the latest scientific data on the possibility of botulinum therapy in cosmetology. Wrinkles of open areas of the body (primarily on the face and in the decollete) have a negative effect on the emotional background and quality of life of women. In this regard, recently there has been a significant increase in demand for aesthetic medicine services, one of the areas of which is botulinum therapy (BT). Botulinum toxin type A (BTA) is a powerful neurotoxin that inhibits the release of acetylcholine in the neuromuscular junction. Injections of small doses of botulinum toxin type A into targeted mimic muscles cause their relaxation, which smoothes the underlying layer of the skin, thereby regressing mimic wrinkles. Today, according to officially approved indications, it is used in cosmetology, botulinum therapy is used to correct mimic wrinkles in the upper third of the face, drooping corners of the mouth, in the complex correction of the face oval, in the treatment of axillary and palmar hyperhidrosis. Blocking a tear mediator like acetylcholine, not only the presynaptic membranes of neuromuscular synapses are rich, but also many anatomical structures, such as glandular tissue (sweat, other glands, etc.). This commonality of the mechanism of action on various physiological processes in our body allows us to make an assumption about the great potential of botulinum therapy in the treatment of a number of diseases associated with impaired neuromuscular conduction.

Potentialities of botulinum therapy in cosmetology

The desire to maintain youth as long as it possible in modern society, especially among women of working age, is primarily due to the desire to be in demand, well-groomed and attractive. Currently, there are 5 main methods that contribute to improving the condition of the skin of the face, namely: the method using professional cosmetics, chemical peels, mesotherapy, treatment with an injection of botulinum toxin type A (BTA) and intradermal implants based on hyaluronic acid. The aim of the literature review was to analyze the latest scientific data on the possibility of botulinum therapy in cosmetology. Wrinkles of open areas of the body (primarily on the face and in the decollete) have a negative effect on the emotional background and quality of life of women. In this regard, recently there has been a significant increase in demand for aesthetic medicine services, one of the areas of which is botulinum therapy (BT). Botulinum toxin type A (BTA) is a powerful neurotoxin that inhibits the release of acetylcholine in the neuromuscular junction. Injections of small doses of botulinum toxin type A into targeted mimic muscles cause their relaxation, which smoothes the underlying layer of the skin, thereby regressing mimic wrinkles. Today, according to officially approved indications, it is used in cosmetology, botulinum therapy is used to correct mimic wrinkles in the upper third of the face, drooping corners of the mouth, in the complex correction of the face oval, in the treatment of axillary and palmar hyperhidrosis. Blocking a tear mediator like acetylcholine, not only the presynaptic membranes of neuromuscular synapses are rich, but also many anatomical structures, such as glandular tissue (sweat, other glands, etc.). This commonality of the mechanism of action on various physiological processes in our body allows us to make an assumption about the great potential of botulinum therapy in the treatment of a number of diseases associated with impaired neuromuscular conduction.

Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection for Mammoplasty and Abdominoplasty Scar Management: A Split-Scar Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Scars are inevitable results of surgical procedures, and prevention of them is still a major problem in the field of cosmetic surgery. Although various studies have been performed on botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) injection for the prevention of hypertrophic scars, the exact mechanism remains unclear.

METHODS

This prospective, double-blinded, randomized study was performed on 19 patients who underwent mammoplasty and abdominoplasty surgery in Razi Hospital from October 2018 to December 2019. Single session of treatment was performed, where XEOMIN was allocated to one half of the scar and 0.9% saline to the control half. 3 and 6 months later, scars were assessed using the modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES).

RESULTS

In total, 19 patients who completed the study were analyzed. mSBSES at the third month (P value < 0.001; 3.34 ± 1.59 vs 1.5 ± 1.36) and the sixth month (P value < 0.001; 4.89 ± 1.83 vs 2.39 ± 1.82) showed a significant difference between the treatment and control groups. In the subset analysis, there was significant difference between BoNT-A and control in all four items including width, height, color, and scar visibility at months 3 and 6, and the BoNT-A-treated sides had higher scores in all items.

CONCLUSION

BoNT-A has a significant effect on scar prevention due to mammoplasty and abdominoplasty compared to placebo and results in decreased erythema, height, width and reduces incision line visibility. Moreover, its effect increases significantly over time from months 3 to 6.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Alternative Clinical Indications of Botulinum Toxin

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) is a powerful neurotoxin that inhibits acetylcholine release from presynaptic vesicles. The potency and safety profile of BoNTA grant the toxin vast therapeutic potential. It has been used off-label for a variety of dermatologic conditions. This review aims to analyze published literature regarding the benefits and risks of the off-label use of BoNTA beyond facial lines, including eccrine hidrocystomas, enlarged pores, keloids and hypertrophic scars, hidradenitis suppurativa, hyperhidrosis, masseter muscle hypertrophy, and salivary gland hypertrophy, among others. A MEDLINE search from January 2000 to December 2019 was conducted on the off-label uses of botulinum toxin in dermatology.

Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Preventing Postoperative Scars and Improving the Cosmetic Appearance of Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Scars with poor cosmesis that develop after wound healing may affect normal life.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) in preventing postoperative hypertrophic scars or keloids.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases from their inception date up to February 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of BTXA in preventing hypertrophic scars or keloids. The primary outcome measures included the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, scar width, patient satisfaction, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Twelve RCTs involving 497 cases (372 patients) were included. The meta-analysis showed significant differences in the VAS score (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.55, P < .00001), VSS score (WMD = -1.02, 95% CI = -1.72 to -0.32, P = .004), scar width (WMD = -0.18, 95% CI = -0.29 to -0.08, P = .0008), and patient satisfaction (relative risk = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.06-1.49, P = .01). Four studies reported trivial adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed that BTXA was more effective than the control treatment in preventing postoperative scars and improving the cosmetic appearance of facial scars for East Asians, and no serious adverse events were found during the follow-up period. However, there was insufficient evidence to support the use of BTXA for the prevention of scars in patients from other ethnic groups and regions or scars in non-facial areas.

Effects of Botulinum Toxin Type A on Microvessels in Hypertrophic Scar Models on Rabbit Ears

Background

Although Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTXA) has been applied to scar prevention and treatment, the mechanisms still require further exploration.

Objective

To investigate the effects of BTXA on microvessels in the hypertrophic scar models on rabbit ears.

Methods

Eight big-eared New Zealand rabbits (males or females) were selected to establish scar models. One ear of each rabbit (4 models in each ear) was selected randomly to be injected with BTXA immediately after modeling and included in the treated group, while the opposite ear was untreated and included in the control group. The growth of scars in each group was observed and recorded, and 4 rabbits were sacrificed on days 30 and 45 after modeling. Then, scar height was measured by hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression was detected by immunohistochemical (IHC) testing, and microvessel density (MVD) was calculated based on CD34 (human hematopoietic progenitor cell antigen).

Results

The wounds in each group were well healed and free from infection or necrosis. On days 30 and 45, the scar height, MVD value, and VEGF expression in the treated group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). For the treated group, the above indicators on day 45 were lower than on day 30 (P > 0.05). Besides, there was a positive correlation between the MVD value and the VEGF expression in the treated group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The injection of BTXA immediately after modeling inhibits VEGF expression and reduces angiogenesis, thereby inhibiting hypertrophic scar formation.

Electrospun Biomaterials in the Treatment and Prevention of Scars in Skin Wound Healing

Electrospinning is a promising method for the rapid and cost-effective production of nanofibers from a wide variety of polymers given the high surface area morphology of these nanofibers, they make excellent wound dressings, and so have significant potential in the prevention and treatment of scars. Wound healing and the resulting scar formation are exceptionally well-characterized on a molecular and cellular level. Despite this, novel effective anti-scarring treatments which exploit this knowledge are still clinically absent. As the process of electrospinning can produce fibers from a variety of polymers, the treatment avenues for scars are vast, with therapeutic potential in choice of polymers, drug incorporation, and cell-seeded scaffolds. It is essential to show the new advances in this field; thus, this review will investigate the molecular processes of wound healing and scar tissue formation, the process of electrospinning, and examine how electrospun biomaterials can be utilized and adapted to wound repair in the hope of reducing scar tissue formation and conferring an enhanced tensile strength of the skin. Future directions of the research will explore potential novel electrospun treatments, such as gene therapies, as targets for enhanced tissue repair applications. With this class of biomaterial gaining such momentum and having such promise, it is necessary to refine our understanding of its process to be able to combine this technology with cutting-edge therapies to relieve the burden scars place on world healthcare systems.

Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Improving Scar Quality and Wound Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin type A-induced "chemoimmobilization" has long been utilized for improved scar quality and wound healing; however, current evidence is limited to small studies, and evidence-based information is inadequate to make well-informed decisions.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of botulinum toxin type A (BTA) to improve scars and wound healing.

METHODS

The authors searched databases, including Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared outcomes of surgical scars and wounds treated with BTA vs those treated with blank or placebo controls. The Visual Analog Scale, Vancouver Scar Score, scar width, and reported patient satisfaction were utilized in evaluating outcomes. Adverse events were also recorded.

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs involved a total of 486 cases (374 patients). Quantitative synthesis suggested that compared with the control group, patients in the BTA treatment group had significantly higher Visual Analog Scale scores (mean difference [MD] = 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05 to 1.55), lower Vancouver Scar Scores (MD = -1.62, 95% CI: -2.49 to -0.75, P = 0.0003), and thinner scars (MD = -0.15, 95% CI: -0.20 to -0.11, P < 0.00001). Patient satisfaction was higher in the BTA group than in the control group (risk ratio: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.49, P = 0.01). Trivial adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis of RCTs provides reliable evidence that BTA injection is superior to placebo or blank control group in improving scar quality and wound healing in the face and neck for Asians, and negative outcomes for BTA treatment in these patients include only trivial adverse events. However, inadequate evidence supports utilization of BTA in Caucasians for primary surgical scars or for scars in locations other than the face and neck. Further studies on the standardized injection regimen and technique of BTA are warranted for clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1

Comparison of botulinum toxin type A and aprotinin monotherapy with combination therapy in healing of burn wounds in an animal model

Burns are one of the most common injuries that are complicated by many challenges including infection, severe inflammatory response, excessive expression of proteases, and scar formation. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of botulinum toxin type A (BO) and aprotinin (AP) separately or in combination (BO-AP) in healing process. Four burn wounds were created in each rat and randomly filled with silver sulfadiazine (SSD), BO, AP and BO-AP. The rats were euthanized after 7, 14, and 28 days, and their harvested wound samples were evaluated by gross pathology, histopathology, gene expression, biochemical testing, and scanning electron microscopy. Both BO and AP significantly reduced expression of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) at the 7th post wounding day. Moreover, they inhibited scar formation by reducing the TGF-β1 level and increasing basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) at the 28th day. AP by decreasing protease production showed more effective role than BO in wound regeneration. AP increased tissue organization and maturation and improved cosmetic appearance of wounds, at 28 days. The best results gained when combination of BO and AP were used in healing of burn wounds. Treatment by BO-AP significantly subsided inflammation compared to the BO, AP, and SSD treated wounds. Treatment with BO-AP also reduced collagen density and led to minimal scar formation. Combination of botulinum toxin type A and aprotinin considerably increased structural and functional properties of the healing wounds by reducing scar formation and decreasing production of proteases.

Appropriate Timing of Early Postoperative Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection for Thyroidectomy Scar Management: A Split-Scar Study

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin type A (BTxA) injection is effective for surgical scar prevention. Although some studies have aimed to confirm the efficacy of BTxA injection at different time points, none has been conducted to determine the most appropriate timing of injection for scar management. The authors predicted that the injection of BTxA at different times during the wound healing process would cause differing scar quality improvement and clarify unknown molecular mechanisms.

METHODS

The study included adults who underwent thyroidectomy. All patients received paralesional BTxA injections on the day of the surgery on either the right or left side of the operative site. The same dose was injected on the noninjected side by means of the same method after 2 weeks. At 2, 4, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively, the modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale, visual analogue scale, and erythema index were used for objective, subjective, and quantitative evaluations of the scar. At week 24 postoperatively, a quantitative scar assessment was performed with respect to the erythema index, skin elasticity, melanin index, and friction.

RESULTS

On objective evaluation of the scar and patient satisfaction at 24 weeks postoperatively, the operation-day injection side showed better outcomes than the 2-week-postoperative injection side. These differences were significant from postoperative week 4. In the final quantitative scar assessment at postoperative week 24, significant improvements were observed in the erythema index and skin elasticity.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that immediate postoperative BTxA injection is more effective for thyroidectomy scar management in terms of erythema, skin elasticity, and patient satisfaction.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

The use of botulinum toxin in keloid scar management: a literature review

INTRODUCTION

Administration of botulinum toxin is an increasingly popular procedure in the medical and aesthetic field. There is emerging evidence that it can influence fibroblast activity and minimise tension around the scar by virtue of muscular chemoimmobilisation. This review aims to explore the current evidence base behind the treatment of keloid scars with botulinum toxin.

METHODS

A detailed literature review was conducted using PubMed Medline, Embase and Web of Science databases. Manuscripts were appraised and classified in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute Levels of Evidence by an independent consultant in evidence synthesis. The results of this search are presented in descending order of evidence for botulinum toxin as a primary management agent as well as a secondary adjunct following extralesional keloid excision.

DISCUSSION

On the basis of level 1 evidence, botulinum toxin appears to be equivalent to triamcinolone in producing a short-term reduction in keloidal volume, height and vascularity. A number of level 1 and 2 studies also suggest that botulinum toxin may be particularly helpful in alleviating symptoms of keloid associated pain and itch. There are currently limited studies appraising the value of botulinum toxin in the postoperative management of keloid scars.

CONCLUSION

Botulinum toxin may represent a promising agent in the management of keloid scars. However, further research involving large-scale studies with comparative designs and long-term follow-up is warranted to delineate the value of this therapeutic modality in scar management protocols.

Effectiveness and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection for Scar Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of active scar prevention in postoperative scar management is important. Botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) has been shown to improve postoperative scars in the past decades. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of BTXA injection for scar prevention.

METHODS

The authors searched the databases of Medicine, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL from inception through November 2018 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the use of BTXA in scar prevention. The outcomes were the visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Vancouver Scar Scale score, scar width, patient satisfaction and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of nine RCTs were identified in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The VAS score was significantly higher in the BTXA group than in the control group (weighted mean difference (WMD) = 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06-1.58, P < 0.00001). The Vancouver Scar Scale score was significantly lower in the BTXA group (WMD = - 1.25, 95% CI = - 2.23 to - 0.26, P = 0.01). The scar width was also significantly smaller in the BTXA group (WMD = - 0.18, 95% CI = - 0.24 to - 0.12, P < 0.00001). There was a significant difference in terms of patient satisfaction between the BTXA group and the control group (relative risk (RR) = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.09-1.74, P = 0.007). Only two studies reported complications, and other studies reported no complications during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that BTXA injection can reduce scar width in wounds and improve the overall appearance of postoperative scars and suggests that BTXA may be a safety therapy for scar prevention.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Botulin Toxin Use in Scars/Keloids Treatment

Botulinum toxin (BTX) is a neurotoxin protein derived from the Clostridium botulinum bacterium that inhibits the release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction level whose effects has been used for many years to treat a variety of muscular/neuromuscular conditions and more recently also for cosmetic use.

BTX has experimented in some dermatological conditions which include scar prevention and treatment with good results The complex mechanism underlying those results is not completely understood but several mechanisms were proposed release inhibition of different substances like (TGF)-β, substance P, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and glutamate thus modulating cutaneous inflammation and wound healing.

We analysed the published data on BTX off label applications on scars and keloids retrieved from PubMed.

Clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of botulinum toxin type A injection for reducing scars in patients with forehead laceration: A double-blinded, randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) is known to prevent fibroblast proliferation and expression of transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1). It also induces temporary muscle paralysis and decreases tension vectors. Fibroblasts induce scar contracture and hypertrophy by producing collagen fibers in wound healing processes. The aim of this study is to identify the effect of BoNTA on the scar formation.

METHODS

Forty-five patients with forehead laceration were enrolled in this study and randomized into 2 groups with or without injection of BoNTA. When the patients presented to the clinic to remove the stitches, BoNTA was injected to the BoNTA group with 24 patients and saline was injected to the control group with 21 patients. The BoNTA was injected on dermal layer with 5 IU/cm. After that, follow-up was done in 1, 3, and 6 months. The scars were analyzed with the patient and observer scar assessment scale, Stony Brook scar evaluation scales (SBSESs), and visual analog scale (VAS) and analyzed with independent T-test, along with clinical photographs, cutometer, and biopsies.

RESULTS

In all scar scales, the scores changed into favorable direction in both groups and the changes were larger in BoNTA group compared with the control group. On SBSES and VAS, better improvements on BoNTA group showed statistical significance. Skin biopsy showed less collagen deposition on dermal layer in BoNTA group.

CONCLUSION

Improvement of aesthetic, functional, and emotional aspect of the scar formation in the groups treated with BoNTA was illustrated. The application of BoNTA may be expanded to prevent hypertrophic scar after trauma, burns, or operations.

Botulinum toxin for ductal stenosis and fistulas of the main salivary glands

This study was performed to present the authors' experience with botulinum toxin therapy for salivary stenosis and salivary fistula in terms of the procedure, dosage, effectiveness, and complications. A retrospective study of all patients treated in the maxillofacial surgery department for salivary stenosis or fistula from January 2014 to September 2018 was performed. Intraglandular injections of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) were utilized. The frequency of relapse and the pain recorded before injection and at 3 months after each injection or fistula resolution were assessed. Swallowing dysfunction or any diffusion of toxin into the facial muscles was recorded. This study included 22 patients (mean age 53 years). Botulinum therapy was indicated for parotid duct stenosis in 14 patients, submandibular duct stenosis in four patients, and parotid fistula in four patients. The frequency of relapse (P =  0.0001) and pain level (P =  0.0001) decreased after botulinum therapy. The average duration of the botulinum effect was 4.50±2.00 months after the first injection. No complication was observed. Botulinum therapy with 100 IU of Xeomin proved effective at resolving salivary fistula. Botulinum therapy is an effective treatment for symptoms of salivary duct stenosis in patients for whom minimally invasive procedures have failed. Botulinum therapy can also be used for the treatment of salivary fistulas.

Intralesional Injection of Botulinum Toxin Type A Compared with Intralesional Injection of Corticosteroid for the Treatment of Hypertrophic Scar and Keloid: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND The optimal treatment for hypertrophic scar and keloid remains controversial. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of intralesional injection of botulinum toxin type A compared with placebo and intralesional injection of corticosteroid compared with placebo in patients with hypertrophic scar and keloid. MATERIAL AND METHODS Six databases were searched using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) keywords and included Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, WanFang, and CNKI from their inception to March 1 2019, without language restriction. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective controlled trials (PCTs) were identified that compared intralesional injection of botulinum toxin type A with placebo and corticosteroid with placebo in hypertrophic scar and keloid. The quality of controlled trials was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). RESULTS Comparison of intralesional botulinum toxin type A and corticosteroid showed significant differences in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (P<0.001) (WMD, -4.30; 95% CI, -4.44 to -4.16) and effective rate (P=0.012) (RR=0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.96). Intralesional injection of botulinum toxin type A compared with placebo showed significant differences in the VAS (P<0.001) (WMD, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.21-1.62), the width of scar (P=0.00) (WMD, -0.15; 95% CI, -0.19 to -0.10) and Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) (P=0.003) (WMD, -0.69; 95% CI, -1.14 to -0.23). CONCLUSIONS Systematic review and meta-analysis showed that injection of intralesional botulinum toxin type A was more effective in the treatment of hypertrophic scar and keloid than injection of intralesional corticosteroid or placebo.

Botulinum Toxin Application in Facial Esthetics and Recent Treatment Indications (2013-2018)

Background

Ever-changing perception of beauty from childhood to old age is changing with the revolution in cosmeceuticals science. Esthetics is an individual's perception since time immemorial. Standards of beauty have changed through centuries with increased awareness about esthetics. The face remains main source of information for identification and discrimination. It constitutes a structural ground for many nonverbal messages including the emotional state of a person, so the proverb "Face is an index of mind" holds good. The wrinkles and laxity are considered to be one of the factors for aging. Hence, escalating demand for cosmetic treatment to reduce facial wrinkles and laxity has stimulated us to search for published literature for nonsurgical techniques for enhancement of facial beauty. The review analyzed the published data to provide narrative basic review in a concise way to the beginners, clinicians, and students.

Materials and Methods

We have adopted search criteria using keywords: Botox, Botulinum toxin, incobotulinumtoxinA, esthetics, face, uses of Botox, with various Boolean operators and or in title, and abstract using PubMed search engine. The database search limited to PubMed only from January 2013 to June 2018.

Results

Various search results have been appended as annexures at the end of the article for further reference for the readers. Finally, 17 references were selected to write narrative review to meet our objectives.

Conclusion

The advancing front in the use of toxins is an emerging science for the beautification of a face. Botox exploded in to market because of efficacy, tolerability, and minimally invasive nature. The present review gives brief about the history of Botulinum toxin, types, mechanism of action, clinical indications, preparations, storage, and technique for various uses with a brief note on patient selection, contraindications, and complications.

The Use of Botulinum Toxin Type A in the Healing of Thyroidectomy Wounds: A Randomized, Prospective, Placebo-Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Recent research has indicated that botulinum toxin type A may have an inhibitory effect on the formation of fibroblasts and thus possibly decreases the severity of scar formation. Therefore, a trial was designed to assess the effects of botulinum toxin type A on scar formation after thyroid surgery.

METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was designed. All patients underwent a preoperative survey to assess scar history. All patients underwent a total thyroidectomy, hemithyroidectomy, or parathyroidectomy through a standardized incision. At the conclusion of the case, one half of the incision was injected with botulinum toxin type A, and the other half was injected with saline (placebo). The scars were then evaluated at 4 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively using subjective scar analysis scales.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were enrolled. There was no significant difference in scarring at any of the time points between the botulinum toxin type A-treated and placebo sides of the incision. A subgroup analysis was performed that examined the effects of botulinum toxin type A on those with a severe scar history. This demonstrated a significant decrease in scarring at 6 months postoperatively on the botulinum toxin type A-treated side.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that botulinum toxin type A administration immediately after surgical closure of a thyroid incision does not demonstrate a difference in scar outcomes compared with the control side. However, there was less scarring in subjects who had a severe scar history. This study found opposite results to a similarly designed study. Further study is required to determine the optimal use of botulinum toxin type A for wound healing.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

The Spectrum of Scarring in Craniofacial Wound Repair

Fibrosis is intimately linked to wound healing and is one of the largest causes of wound-related morbidity. While scar formation is the normal and inevitable outcome of adult mammalian cutaneous wound healing, scarring varies widely between different anatomical sites. The spectrum of craniofacial wound healing spans a particularly diverse range of outcomes. While most craniofacial wounds heal by scarring, which can be functionally and aesthetically devastating, healing of the oral mucosa represents a rare example of nearly scarless postnatal healing in humans. In this review, we describe the typical wound healing process in both skin and the oral cavity. We present clinical correlates and current therapies and discuss the current state of research into mechanisms of scarless healing, toward the ultimate goal of achieving scarless adult skin healing.