Flap choice does not affect complication rates or functional outcomes following extremity soft tissue sarcoma reconstruction

Twenty-five years of experience with patient-reported outcome measures in soft-tissue sarcoma patients: a systematic review

PURPOSE

As the importance of the patient's perspective on treatment outcome is becoming increasingly clear, the availability of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has grown accordingly. There remains insufficient information regarding the quality of PROMs in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs). The objectives of this systematic review were (1) to identify all PROMs used in STS patients and (2) to critically appraise the methodological quality of these PROMs.

METHODS

Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE and Embase on April 22, 2024. PROMs were identified by including all studies that evaluate (an aspect of) health-related quality of life in STS patients by using a PROM. Second, studies that assessed measurement properties of the PROMs utilized in STS patients were included. Quality of PROMs was evaluated by performing a COSMIN analysis.

RESULTS

In 59 studies, 39 PROMs were identified, with the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) being the most frequently utilized. Three studies evaluated methodological quality of PROMs in the STS population. Measurement properties of the TESS, Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) and European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) were reported. None of the PROMs utilized in the STS population can be recommended for use based on the current evidence and COSMIN analysis.

CONCLUSION

To ensure collection of reliable outcomes, PROMs require methodological evaluation prior to utilization in the STS population. Research should prioritize on determining relevant content and subsequently selecting the most suitable PROM for assessment.

Combined Use of the Hemi-Split Tibialis Anterior Muscle and Soleus Muscle Flap for Reconstruction After the Excision of a Recurrent Soft Tissue Sarcoma in the Lower Leg

Reconstruction of large tissue defects following soft tissue sarcoma (STS) resection in the lower extremity presents a significant challenge for plastic surgeons. The optimal method should be selected from a wide array of techniques, depending on the size and location of the defect. Both pedicled and free flaps have demonstrated favorable outcomes. However, due to the nature of STS, there is concern about recurrence and the potential complications for secondary reconstruction. A 78-year-old male with leiomyosarcoma in the proximal third of the leg underwent wide excision and reconstruction using a pedicled medial gastrocnemius muscle flap. Local recurrence occurred at six months postoperatively, necessitating a second extended resection. This was followed by reconstruction using a hemi-split tibialis anterior muscle and hemi-split soleus muscle flaps, combined with a split-thickness skin graft. The postoperative course was uneventful, with complete survival of both the muscle flap and skin graft and no functional limitations in the lower extremity. The hemi-split tibialis anterior and soleus muscle flaps are considered valuable methods for reconstruction, preserving lower extremity function.

Mapping the Course of Recovery Following Limb-Salvage Surgery for Soft-Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities

BACKGROUND

Despite the goal of an acceptable functional result, the surgical treatment of soft-tissue sarcoma can portend a prolonged course of recovery. More comprehensive data on the expected course of recovery following extremity sarcoma surgery are needed to help to inform physicians and patients. The purpose of the present study was to describe the typical course of functional recovery following limb-salvage resection of a soft-tissue sarcoma and to identify factors associated with a delayed postoperative course of recovery.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained institutional database was performed for all patients undergoing surgical treatment with limb salvage of a soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities or pelvis with at least 1 year of follow-up after the definitive surgical procedure. All patients were required to have preoperative functional outcomes recorded for either the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) or the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and functional outcome measures at 1 year postoperatively. The primary outcome measures were time to recovery and maximal functional improvement.

RESULTS

In this study, 916 patients met inclusion criteria following surgical resection of a soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities. The median follow-up was 74 months. Patients typically achieved a return to their baseline preoperative level of function for all functional outcome measures by 1 to 2 years and achieved maximal functional recovery by 2 years postoperatively. Older age, female sex, deep tumor location, larger tumor size, pelvic location, osseous resection, motor nerve resection, free and/or rotational soft-tissue coverage, and postoperative complications were independently associated with worse TESS and/or MSTS scores (p ≤ 0.05). Tumor recurrence was associated with worse functional outcomes scores. An analysis was performed to determine which patients had a prolonged course of recovery (i.e., were considered to still be recovering). Older age, female sex, larger tumor size, osseous resection, and motor nerve resection were associated with a delayed course of recovery (p ≤ 0.04). Complications and tumor recurrence were associated with delayed functional recovery across all domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients will achieve maximal recovery by 2 to 3 years following surgical resection for soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities. Older age, female sex, larger tumor size, osseous resection, motor nerve resection, postoperative complications, and tumor recurrence portend poorer functional outcomes and a delayed course of recovery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

When to ditch the ladder and take the elevator: The Anderson SArcoma Risk of Complications (A-SARC) score to guide reconstructive decision-making in extremity soft tissue sarcoma patients

BACKGROUND

The reconstructive ladder relies mostly on defect size and depth to determine reconstructive technique, however, in actuality, many more variables ultimately inform reconstructive decision making, especially regarding extremity soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS) defects. The purpose of this study was to describe eSTS patients who will most optimally benefit from an advanced method of reconstruction (defined as a pedicled regional flap or free flap) and to create a simple risk assessment scale that can be employed in clinical practice.

STUDY DESIGN

A single-institution retrospective cohort study examined patients undergoing resection of soft tissue sarcoma affecting the upper or lower extremities between 2016 and 2021. We categorized patients who required a pedicled or free flap as having had advanced reconstruction, and all other techniques were considered simple reconstruction. A regression was used to create a risk scale to guide reconstructive decision-making.

RESULTS

The following variables were identified as independent predictors of complications and used to create our risk scale: lower extremity tumor location, preoperative radiotherapy, tumor bed excision, male sex, hypertension, and tumor volume. Intermediate and high-risk patients reconstructed using simple techniques had significantly greater overall complication rates compared to those reconstructed with advanced techniques. Major complications were significantly greater in low-risk patients reconstructed with advanced techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

To minimize postoperative wound complications, low-risk patients should receive simple methods of reconstruction, whereas high-risk patients should be reconstructed using advanced techniques.

Extremity and Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Risk Assessment and Multidisciplinary Management

Extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of rare cancers that arise from mesenchymal tissues. Hence, the adoption of tailored risk assessment and prognostication tools plays a crucial role in optimizing the decision-making for which of the many possible treatment strategies to select. Management of these tumors requires a multidisciplinary strategy, which has seen significant development in recent decades. Surgery has emerged as the primary treatment approach, with the main goal of achieving microscopic negative tumor margins. To reduce the likelihood of local recurrence, loco-regional treatments such as radiation therapy and isolated limb perfusion are often added to the treatment regimen in combination with surgery. This approach also enables surgeons to perform limb-sparing surgery, particularly in cases where a positive tumor margin is expected. Chemotherapy may also provide a further benefit in decreasing the probability of local recurrence or reducing distant metastasis in selected patients. Selecting the optimal treatment strategy for these rare tumors is best accomplished by an experienced multi-disciplinary team.

Single-Stage Reconstruction with Innate Chimeric-Free Fibula Flap in Limb-Preserving Excision of Upper Limb Sarcomas

Introduction

The limb-preserving excision is the standard of care in upper limb sarcoma management, but the resulting complex composite defects are exacting the expertise of the reconstructive surgeons. This study was done to evaluate a novel single-stage reconstruction of these defects using an innate chimeric-free fibula flap (a nonfabricated, anatomically available multiple tissue components harvested on independent perforators arising from the same peroneal source vessel).

Patients and Methods

Twenty patients (16 male/4 female) with an average age of 29.5 years with upper extremity sarcoma (Enneking IIA/IIB) were treated by wide local excision and innate chimeric-free fibula flap reconstruction from March 2012 to March 2020. All the patients were followed for an average period of 18.3 months. At the end of the follow-up, the outcome was assessed by musculoskeletal tumor score (MSTS).

Results

The flow-through flap was done in five patients. Muscle-tendon unit defects were reconstructed with a vascularized peroneus longus muscle-tendon unit in 15 patients. Nerve gap reconstruction using vascularized superficial peroneal nerve was done in eight patients. All patients had a segmental defect in the appendicular skeleton that was reconstructed with the vascularized fibular strut component. Soleus chimeric muscle component was used as a void filler and for covering the hardware in seven patients. The average size of the chimeric cutaneous component paddle was 30.7 cm2. The average length of fibula used for reconstruction was 16.6 cm. All flaps survived well, facilitating good hand function at the end of the follow-up. The average outcome score as per the MSTS was 22 (p = 0.035).

Conclusion

The innate chimeric-free fibula flap provides all tissue components facilitating a good functional outcome. The advantage is the restoration of a functional hand in a single-stage reconstruction.

A Systematic Review of the Orthoplastic Approach in Adult Lower Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma Flap Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The orthoplastic approach to patient care has changed the way patients with a wide variety of lower extremity pathology are treated. Through a systematic review, we aim to analyze outcomes in adult patients with lower extremity soft tissue sarcomas who undergo an orthoplastic flap management approach to their care.

METHODS

A systematic review of adult lower extremity soft tissue sarcoma excision with plastic surgery flap reconstruction was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines searching the Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to April 2023.

RESULTS

After removal of duplicates, title and abstract screening, and full-text review, 26 articles were accepted for inclusion. The total mean follow-up duration was 32.0 ± 24.3 months. Reconstruction used microvascular free flaps in 65.5% (487/743), while 34.5% (256/743) were local flaps. 85.8% (307/358) of patients ambulated postoperatively. Revision surgery was required in 21% of patients during their respective follow-up periods. The limb salvage rate was 93.4% (958/1,026). Among pooled surgical outcomes, 22.2% (225/1,012) of patients experienced a perioperative complication.

DISCUSSION

Our study demonstrates that although complication rates in lower extremity soft tissue sarcoma reconstruction may be further optimized, a multidisciplinary flap reconstructive approach provides high rates of limb salvage and functional postoperative ambulation.

System describing surgical field extension associated with flap reconstruction after resection of a superficial malignant soft tissue tumor

BACKGROUND

Flap reconstruction after resection of a superficial malignant soft tissue tumor extends the surgical field and is an indicator for potential recurrence sites.

AIM

To describe a grading system for surgical field extension of soft tissue sarcomas.

METHODS

Grading system: CD-grading is a description system consisting of C and D values in the surgical field extension, which are related to the compartmental position of the flap beyond the nearby large joint and deeper extension for the pedicle, respectively. C1/D1 are positive values and C0/D0 are negative. With a known location, 1/0 values can be "p" (proximal), "d" (distal), and "b" (in the tumor bed), and the description method is as follows: flap type, CxDx [x = 0, 1, p, d or b].

RESULTS

Four representative patients with subcutaneous sarcomas who underwent reconstruction using fasciocutaneous flaps are presented. The cases involved a distal upper arm (elbow) synovial sarcoma reconstructed using a pedicled latissimus dorsi (pedicled flap: CpDp); a distal upper arm (elbow) pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma reconstructed using a transpositional flap from the forearm (transpositional flap: CdD0); an undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma in the buttocks reconstructed using a transpositional flap (transpositional flap: C0D0); and a myxofibrosarcoma in the buttocks reconstructed using a propeller flap from the thigh (pedicled flap: CdDd).

CONCLUSION

The reconstruction method is chosen by the surgeon based on size, location, and other tumor characteristics; however, the final surgical field cannot be determined based on preoperative images alone. CD-grading is a description system consisting of C and D values in the surgical field extension that are related to the compartmental position of the flap beyond the nearby large joint and deeper extension for the pedicle, respectively. The CD-grading system gives a new perspective to the flap reconstruction classification. The CD-grading system also provides important information for follow-up imaging of a possible recurrence.

Calculating Tumor Volume Using Three-Dimensional Models in Preoperative Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Surgical Planning: Does Size Matter?

This feasibility study aims to explore the use of three-dimensional virtual surgical planning to preoperatively determine the need for reconstructive surgery following resection of an extremity soft-tissue sarcoma. As flap reconstruction is performed more often in advanced disease, we hypothesized that tumor volume would be larger in the group of patients that had undergone flap reconstruction. All patients that were treated by surgical resection for an extremity soft-tissue sarcoma between 1 January 2016 and 1 October 2019 in the University Medical Center Groningen were included retrospectively. Three-dimensional models were created using the diagnostic magnetic resonance scan. Tumor volume was calculated for all patients. Three-dimensional tumor volume was 107.8 (349.1) mL in the group of patients that had undergone primary closure and 29.4 (47.4) mL in the group of patients in which a flap reconstruction was performed, p = 0.004. Three-dimensional tumor volume was 76.1 (295.3) mL in the group of patients with a complication following ESTS treatment, versus 57.0 (132.4) mL in patients with an uncomplicated course following ESTS treatment, p = 0.311. Patients who had undergone flap reconstruction had smaller tumor volumes compared to those in the group of patients treated by primary closure. Furthermore, a larger tumor volume did not result in complications for patients undergoing ESTS treatment. Therefore, tumor volume does not seem to influence the need for reconstruction. Despite the capability of three-dimensional virtual surgical planning to measure tumor volume, we do not recommend its utilization in the multidisciplinary extremity soft-tissue sarcoma treatment, considering the findings of the study.

Results of resection of forearm soft tissue sarcoma

PURPOSE

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the forearm are rare. We aim to assess their oncological and functional outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 34 patients who underwent surgical excision for forearm STS at our institution between 1993 and 2020. We analyzed postoperative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society rating scale (MSTS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival, and overall survival (OS) rates. The significance of the following variables was determined: age, sex, histology, tumor size, Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte contre le Cancer grade, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, surgical margin, unplanned excision, metastases upon initial presentation, receipt of chemotherapy, and radiotherapy (RT).

RESULTS

The postoperative median MSTS score was 28. Bone resection or major nerve palsy was the only factor that influenced MSTS scores. The median MSTS scores in patients with or without bone resection or major nerve palsy were 24 and 29, respectively (P < 0.001). The 5-year LRFS rates was 87%. Univariate analysis revealed that the histological diagnosis of myxofibrosarcoma was the only factor that influenced LRFS (P = 0.047). The 5-year MFS rates was 71%. In univariate analysis, no factors were associated with MFS. The 5-year OS rates was 79%. Age was the only factor that influenced OS (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of forearm STS, reconstruction of the skin and tendon can compensate for function, while bone resection and major nerve disturbance cannot. Careful follow-up is important, especially in patients with myxofibrosarcoma, due to its likelihood of local recurrence.

Flap Reconstruction Outcome Following Surgical Resection of Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma in the Setting of (Neo)adjuvant Therapy: A Sarcoma Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue and bone sarcomas are heterogeneous groups of malignant tumors. The shift in their management, with an emphasis on limb salvage, has deemed the involvement of reconstructive surgeons an integral part of their multidisciplinary treatment. We present our experience with free and pedicled flaps in the reconstruction of sarcomas at a tertiary referral university hospital and major sarcoma center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients undergoing flap reconstruction after sarcoma resection over a 5-year period have been included in the study. Patient-related data and postoperative complications were collected retrospectively, ensuring a minimum follow-up of 3 years.

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients underwent treatment with 26 free flaps and 64 pedicled flaps. Postoperative complications occurred in 37.7% of patients, and the flap failure rate was 4.4%. Diabetes, alcohol consumption and male gender were associated with increased early necrosis of the flap. Preoperative chemotherapy significantly increased the occurrence of early infection and late dehiscence, while preoperative radiotherapy was associated with a higher incidence of lymphedema. Intraoperative radiotherapy was associated with late seromas and lymphedema.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstructive surgery with either pedicled or free flaps is reliable, but it can be demanding in the setting of sarcoma surgery. A higher complication rate is to be expected with neoadjuvant therapy and with certain comorbidities.

Determining functional outcomes after resection and reconstruction of primary soft tissue sarcoma in the lower extremity: A review of current subjective and objective measurement systems

The surgical management of soft-tissue sarcoma has evolved significantly over the last two decades due to the routine use of adjunct therapies, with an increased focus on postoperative functional outcome. The literature suffers from methodological inconsistency and use of low quality outcome measures to assess an already heterogeneous population. This article aims to review the most frequently used subjective and objective methods of functional outcome assessment and highlight the current benefits and limitations of these.

Outcomes of plastic surgical reconstruction in extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma: Results from the US Sarcoma Collaborative

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to define how utilization of plastic surgical reconstruction (PSR) affects perioperative outcomes, locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), and overall survival (OS) after radical resection of extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma (ETSTS). The secondary aim was to determine factors associated with PSR.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection of ETSTS between 2000 and 2016 were identified from a multi-institutional database. PSR was defined as complex primary closure requiring a plastic surgeon, skin graft, or tissue-flap reconstruction. Outcomes included PSR utilization, postoperative complications, LRRFS, and OS.

RESULTS

Of 2750 distinct operations, 1060 (38.55%) involved PSR. Tissue-flaps (854, 80.57%) were most commonly utilized. PSR was associated with a higher proportion of R0 resections (83.38% vs. 74.42%, p < 0.001). Tissue-flap PSR was associated with local wound complications (odds ratio: 1.81, confidence interval: 1.21-2.72, p = 0.004). Neither PSR nor postoperative complications were independently associated with LRRFS or OS. High-grade tumors (1.60, 1.13-2.26, p = 0.008) and neoadjuvant radiation (1.66, 1.20-2.30, p = 0.002) were associated with the need for PSR.

CONCLUSION

Patients with ETSTS undergoing resection with PSR experienced acceptable rates of complications and a higher rate of negative margins, which were associated with improved LRRFS and OS. High tumor grade and neoadjuvant radiation were associated with requirement of PSR.

A Size-Based Criteria for Flap Reconstruction After Thigh-Adductor, Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Resection

BACKGROUND

Resection of soft-tissue sarcomas from the adductor compartment is associated with significant complications. Free/pedicled flaps often are used for wound closure, but their effect on healing is unclear. We compared wound complications, oncologic, and functional outcomes for patients undergoing flap reconstruction or primary closure following resection of adductor sarcomas.

METHODS

A total of 177 patients underwent resection of an adductor sarcoma with primary closure (PrC) or free/pedicled flap reconstruction (FR). Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were compared, as well as wound complications, oncologic, and functional outcomes (TESS/MSTS87/MSTS93). To examine the relative benefit of flap reconstruction, number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated.

RESULTS

In total, 143 patients underwent PrC and 34 had FR, 68% of which were pedicled. There were few differences in demographic, tumor, or treatment characteristics. No significant difference was found in the rate of wound complications. Length of stay was significantly longer in FR (18 days vs. PrC 8 days; p < 0.01). Oncologic and functional outcomes were similar over 5 years follow-up. Uncomplicated wound healing occurred more often in FR compared with PrC for tumors with ≥15 cm (NNT = 8.4) or volumes ≥ 800 ml (NNT = 8.4). Tumors ≤ 336 ml do not benefit from a flap, whereas those > 600 ml are 1.5 times more likely to heal uneventfully after flap closure.

CONCLUSIONS

Although flap use prolonged hospitalization, it decreased wound healing complications for larger tumors, and in all sized tumors, it demonstrated similar functional and oncologic outcomes to primary closure. Our size-based treatment criteria can help to identify patients with large adductor sarcomas who could benefit from flap reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

(Retrospective cohort study).

Patient-reported outcomes following free flap lower extremity reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Free flap reconstruction in the lower extremity has shown success for the management of large and complex defects, restoration of function, and favorable aesthetic outcomes. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have not been well explored in previous literature. This meta-analysis aimed to provide a comprehensive summary of PROs after free flap reconstruction in the lower extremity.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 1946 to 2021 for studies reporting on PROs following free flap reconstruction in the lower extremity.

RESULTS

Overall, 53 studies were included, and 11 studies reported validated PRO measures for meta-analysis. A total of 1953 patients underwent reconstruction with 1958 free flaps for lower limb defects with a mean follow-up of 3.26 (0.25-7.83) months. The mean postoperative Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) scores were 60.3 (±12) out of 80 points (4 studies, 85 patients). The mean postoperative AOFAS scores were 75.1 (±15) out of 100 points (4 studies, 68 patients). The mean postoperative SF-36 scores were 88.1 (±8.0) out of 100 points; mental health component was 48.7 (±8.9), and physical component was 38.4 (±8.2), out of 50 points (4 studies, 88 patients).

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrated that patients report improved physical health, mental health, and function following lower extremity reconstruction with free flaps. Patients reported similar improvements in functional scores following lower extremity reconstruction regardless of their free flap type. Furthermore, patients with myocutaneous flaps may have improved mental health and worse physical health scores when compared to perforator flaps. The evidence profiles presented in this review indicate that additional research is needed to help guide future decision-making.

Risk factors associated with 30-day complications following lower extremity sarcoma surgery: A national surgical quality improvement project analysis

BACKGROUND

Our study aims to identify risk factors associated with complications in lower extremity (LE) sarcoma surgery, as well as the prevalence and complications associated with concurrent plastic surgery procedures (CPSP).

METHODS

ACS-NSQIP database was accessed to identify patients treated for LE sarcoma (2010-2019). Patient demographics, preoperative lab, comorbidities, tumor type, location, principle procedure, and presence/characteristics of CPSPs were recorded. Thirty-day soft tissue complications were analyzed. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed on IBM SPSS.™ RESULTS: Nine hundred eighteen patients were included (483 males and 435 females), average age and body mass index (BMI) of 57 and 27.4 kg/m,² respectively. Comorbidities included smoking (13.9%, 128), hypertension (37.3%, 342), and insulin-dependent diabetes (3.7%, 34). Preoperative lab values included albumin <3.5 (6.8%, 63), hematocrit <30% (8.2%, 75), and platelet count <150 000 (5.9%, 54). Thirty-day soft tissue complication rate was 5.7% (52 of 918). On multivariate logistic regression, increased age (p = 0.039), higher BMI (p = 0.017), and longer operative times (p = 0.002) were significant risk factors independently associated with soft tissue complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Soft tissue complications within 30 days occur in 6% of patients. Graft procedures carry a 20% risk of complications. Risk factors independently associated with complications include increased age, increased BMI, and longer operative times.

Soft Tissue Sarcoma of Lower Extremity: Functional Outcome and Quality of Life

Background

Few studies have focused on patient-related factors in analyzing long-term functional outcome and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with postoperative lower extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate factors associated with postoperative functional outcome and HRQoL in patients with lower extremity STS.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was performed in a tertiary referral center using the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 and 15 Dimension (15D) measures. Functional outcome and HRQoL data were collected prospectively. All patients were treated by a multidisciplinary team according to a written treatment protocol.

Results

A total of 141 patients who had undergone limb-salvage surgery were included. Depending on the outcome measure used, 19–51% of patients were completely asymptomatic and 13–14% of patients had an unimpaired HRQoL. The mean score for TESS, 15D mobility score, and QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning scale were 86, 0.83, and 75, respectively, while the mean score for 15D was 0.88, and 73 for QLQ-C30 QoL. Lower functional outcome was statistically significantly associated with higher age, higher body mass index (BMI), and the need for reconstructive surgery and radiotherapy, while lower HRQoL was statistically significantly associated with higher age, higher BMI, and reconstructive surgery.

Conclusion

Functional outcome and HRQoL were generally high in this cross-sectional study of patients with STS in the lower extremity. Both tumor- and treatment-related factors had an impact but patient-related factors such as age and BMI were the major determinants of both functional outcome and HRQoL.

Supplementary Information

The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-021-09774-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Factors associated with 30-day soft tissue complications following upper extremity sarcoma surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The incidence of soft tissue complications following sarcoma surgery in the upper extremity is reportedly high. Therefore, this study assessed the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database to identify independent risk factors, while also reporting the incidence of soft tissue complications in the first 30 days after surgery.

METHODS

A total of 620 patients that underwent surgical treatment for upper extremity sarcoma were included from the NSQIP database. Soft tissue complications were defined as surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, or soft-tissue related reoperations. Clinically relevant patient and treatment characteristics were selected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The 30-day soft tissue complication rate was 4.7%. In the multivariable analysis, higher body mass index (p = .047) and longer operative times (p = .002) were independently associated with soft tissue complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher body mass index and longer operative times are risk factors for soft tissue complications following upper extremity sarcoma surgery. The soft-tissue complication rate following resection of upper extremity tumors is low in this national cohort, possibly due to the relatively small tumor size and low prevalence of radiotherapy.

Reconstruction of upper limb soft-tissue defects after sarcoma resection with free flaps: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Upper limb preservation after soft tissue sarcoma (STS) surgical excision is now the accepted gold standard and it often requires reconstruction with free flaps. The purpose of this review is to summarize current literature on upper limb reconstruction with free flaps after STS resection.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in July 2019 in PubMed and MedLine Ovid databases according to the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies were included in the final analysis, with 132 patients. The most common diagnosis was Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma. The most frequent timing of flap coverage was immediate. The success rate was almost always 100%. The length of follow-up was reported in 11 studies with a range of 2-187 months. The most commonly reported patient-centered outcome was the MSTS Score. Based on the evidence of the literature collected, we divided the upper limb into four parts (shoulder, elbow and arm, forearm and wrist, and hand) and described the most common and functional free flaps used for reconstruction after STS resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Free flaps in the treatment of STS of the upper extremity have a good overall outcome, with a low postoperative complication rate. A wide array of free flaps is available for reconstruction, and the choice of flap is based on defect size, types of tissue required, postoperative functional goal, and surgeon preference. A greater degree of standardization is needed in the reporting of patient-centered outcomes to facilitate future comparative studies.

The Toronto Sarcoma Flap Score: A Validated Wound Complication Classification System for Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma Flap Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Flap reconstruction plays an important role in limb preservation after wide resection of extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS), but can be associated with high rates of postoperative wound complications. Currently, no standardized system exists for the classification of these complications. This study aimed to develop a standardized classification system for wound complications after ESTS flap reconstruction.

METHODS

Outcomes of ESTS flap reconstructions were analyzed in a retrospective cohort of 300 patients. All wound- and flap-related complications were identified and categorized. Based on these data, a scoring system was developed and validated with a prospective cohort of 100 patients who underwent ESTS flap reconstruction.

RESULTS

A 10-point scoring system was developed based on the level of intervention required to treat each complication observed in the retrospective cohort. Raters applied the scoring system to the prospective patient cohort. Validation studies demonstrated excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability (weighted Cohen's kappa range, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.5-1.0] to 0.99 [95% CI, 0.98-1.0] and 0.95 [95% CI, 0.84-1.0] to 0.97 [95% CI, 0.92-1.0], respectively). The majority of the raters reported the score to be simple, objective, and reproducible (respective mean scores, 4.76 ± 0.43, 4.53 ± 0.62, and 4.56 ± 0.56 on 5-point Likert scales).

CONCLUSION

The Toronto Sarcoma Flap Score (TSFS) is a simple and objective classification system with excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability. Universal adoption of the TSFS could standardize outcome reporting in future studies and aid in the establishment of clinical benchmarks to improve the quality of care in sarcoma reconstruction.

Free flap reconstruction of sarcoma defects in the setting of radiation: a ten-year experience

Neoadjuvant treatment and surgical resection for sarcoma patients can often leave devastating wounds necessitating soft-tissue coverage in the form of free flaps. There is still debate as to the optimal flap for reconstruction of defects in irradiated fields. We aim to describe our experiences with free fasciocutaneous and free muscle flaps for sarcoma reconstruction in the setting of radiation therapy. A retrospective chart review was conducted encompassing all patients requiring soft-tissue reconstruction secondary to sarcoma resection from January 2010 to June 2019. Patient characteristics, flap viability and post-operative healing outcomes were all recorded and examined. In total, 49 patients who underwent 51 free-flaps were identified. Of these, 30 flaps were fasciocutaneous, while 21 were muscle-based. Most patients received pre-operative radiotherapy (76.5%), although these rates were not different between groups of flap type, and had no significant association with post-operative outcomes. Complication rates (31.3%) and re-operative rates (21.6%) were also comparable between flap types. Diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with delayed wound healing (p < .016), while the presence of peripheral vascular disease had a significant association with post-operative infection (p < .006). This study shows that free fasciocutaneous and free muscle-based flaps are both viable options for soft-tissue reconstruction demanded by sarcoma resection, even in the setting of radiation. Peripheral vascular disease and diabetes mellitus may confer increased wound complications.

A reconstructive algorithm of oncologic defects of the upper trunk and shoulder girdle: Factors predicting complexity and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced malignancies of the upper torso and shoulder girdle (UT-SG) necessitate extensive resection and complex reconstruction. Due to the infrequent nature of these operations, a global reconstructive algorithm has not been defined.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who received reconstructive surgery following malignant tumor extirpation in the UT-SG from 2008 to 2018 at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Factors predicting the need for flap reconstruction and risk for postoperative complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 252 procedures met inclusion criteria. The most common pathology was sarcoma (76%) and 52% were primary tumors. The median defect area was 112 cm² (range 4-1350 cm² ). Reconstructive techniques included pedicled flaps (46%), local tissue rearrangement (38%), and free flaps (16%). On univariate analysis, the probability of needing a free flap increased 39% when the defect size increased by 100 cm² . The strongest independent predictors of requiring a free flap were major vessel exposure (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 4.92, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-17.84, P = .015) and major peripheral nerve exposure (adjusted OR = 3.2, 95% CI, 1.1-9.2, P = .031).

CONCLUSION

Despite the aggressive nature of their malignancies, patients requiring an UT-SG resection demonstrate high survival rates and therefore demand a durable reconstruction. Exposed critical structures and defect size were predictive of free tissue transfer.

A comparison of delayed versus immediate reconstruction following lower-extremity sarcoma resection

Background

Identifying patients who may be at high risk for wound complications postsarcoma resection and reconstruction is essential for improving functional outcomes and quality of life. Currently, the effect of timing on sarcoma reconstruction has been poorly investigated. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of delayed and immediate reconstruction in the setting of sarcoma resection requiring flap reconstruction in the lower extremity.

Methods

A retrospective review of the senior author’s sarcoma reconstruction patients from January 2005 to July 2017 was completed. All patients undergoing flap reconstruction of the lower extremity were included. Complications in the early postoperative period were compared between delayed and immediate reconstructive procedures.

Results

A total of 32 patients (7 delayed, 25 immediate) were included in this study. There was a significantly increased rate of overall complications (100% vs. 28.0%, P=0.001) and rate of hematomas (28.6% vs. 0.0%, P=0.042) in the delayed reconstruction group. Other complications including dehiscence, seroma, infection, venous thrombosis, and total/partial flap loss were also increased in the delayed reconstruction group, but this was not considered to be significant.

Conclusions

This study suggests that delayed reconstruction following sarcoma resection of the lower extremity had a higher incidence of overall complications and hematoma formation. We emphasize the importance of early plastic and reconstructive surgeon referral and the necessity to closely monitor delayed reconstruction patients for complications.

Primary appendicular soft-tissue sarcoma resection: What tumour parameters affect wound closure planning?

Wound closure after wide, local excision of an appendicular soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) can be challenging. This study evaluates the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based tumour parameters in planning wound closure. A total of 71 patients with a primary limb-based STS, excluding vascular or osseous involvement, excluding the shoulder or hand and hip or foot were included. Axial MRI images were used to measure the circumferences and cross-sectional areas of the limb, bone, and tumour. The tumour diameter, length, and depth at the level of maximal tumour dimension were measured to identify the tumour's relative contribution to the planning of optimal wound closure management through primary closure (PC) or reconstructive surgery (RS). Eighteen patients required planned wound RS. Wound complications occurred in 14% overall. Tumours, which were closed by PC, were of significantly greater depth, shorter radial diameter, and shorter tumour circumference relative to those closed by RS. On multivariate analysis, tumour depth was the greatest contributory factor in predicting type of wound closure. A quantitative analysis of MRI-based tumour parameters demonstrates tumour depth as the most predictive factor in planning for the type of wound closure and may prove beneficial in providing greater insight into planned wound management of sarcoma resection.

Functional Outcome Measurement in Patients with Lower-Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Systematic Literature Review

Background

The importance of functional outcome (FO) in the treatment of patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) has been increasingly recognized in the last three decades. This systematic review aimed to investigate how FO is measured in surgically treated lower-extremity STS patients.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus was performed based on the PRISMA guidelines. The methodologic quality of the publications was measured using the MINORS tool. The results from the included studies examining measurement types, measures, and time of FO measurement were compiled. The FO pooled mean and standard deviation were calculated as a weighted average for the groups. The validity of the applied measures is reported.

Results

The literature search found 3461 publications, 37 of which met the inclusion criteria. The measurement types used were clinician-reported outcomes (n = 27), patient-reported outcomes (n = 20), and observer-reported outcomes (n = 2). The most frequently used measures were the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) (n = 16) and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score 1993 (n = 12). The postoperative FO was relatively good. The pooled mean TESS and MSTS 1993 scores were respectively 83.3 and 86.2 (out of 100). Of the 10 previously reported measures, 3 provide validated FO scores. The methodologic quality of publications was generally low.

Conclusions

Based on this systematic review, several different methods exist for assessing FO in patients with lower-extremity sarcoma. The most frequently used measure is a validated TESS. The postoperative FO of patients with lower-extremity STS seems to increase to the preoperative baseline level during long-term follow-up evaluation.