Role of nitric oxide in the rat hippocampal CA1 in morphine antinociception

The regulatory role of nitric oxide in morphine-induced analgesia in the descending path of pain from the dorsal hippocampus to the dorsolateral periaqueductal gray

BACKGROUND

Nitric oxide (NO) levels in brain nuclei, such as the hippocampus and brainstem, are involved in morphine analgesia, but the relationship between the dorsal hippocampus (dH) and the dorsolateral periaqueductal gray matter (dlPAG) needs to be clarified, which is our goal.

METHODS

Wistar rats were simultaneously equipped with a stereotaxic device with unilateral guide cannula at dH and dlPAG. After recovery, they were divided into control and experimental groups. Formalin (50 μL of 2.5%) was inoculated into the left hind paw of rat. Morphine (6 mg/kg) was administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) 10 min before formalin injection. L-Arginine (0.25, 0.5, 1 and 2 μg/rat), and L-NAME (0.25, 0.5, 1 and 2 μg/rat), unrelatedly or with the respect in the order of injection were used in the nuclei before morphine injection (i.p.). Activation of the neuronal NO synthase (nNOS) in the brains of all animals was measured using NADPH-diaphorase, a selective biochemical marker of nNOS.

RESULTS

Morphine reduced inflammatory pain in the early and late stages of the rat formalin test. The morphine response was attenuated by before injection of single L-arginine but not L-NAME in the two target areas. However, the acute phase result was stopped due to L-NAME pretreatment. When L-NAME was injected into dlPAG before injecting L-arginine at dH, the morphine response did not decrease at all, indicating a modulatory role of NO in dlPAG, which was confirmed by NADPH-d staining.

CONCLUSIONS

High levels of NO in dlPAG may regulate pain process in downward synaptic interactions.

A20-Binding Inhibitor of Nuclear Factor-κB Targets β-Arrestin2 to Attenuate Opioid Tolerance

Opioids play an important role in pain relief, but repeated exposure results in tolerance and dependence. To make opioids more effective and useful, research in the field has focused on reducing the tolerance and dependence for chronic pain relief. Here, we showed the effect of A20-binding inhibitor of nuclear factor-κB (ABIN-1) in modulating morphine function. We used hot-plate tests and conditioned place preference (CPP) tests to show that overexpression of ABIN-1 in the mouse brain attenuated morphine dependence. These effects of ABIN-1 are most likely mediated through the formation of ABIN-1-β-arrestin2 complexes, which accelerate β-arrestin2 degradation by ubiquitination. With the degradation of β-arrestin2, ABIN-1 overexpression also decreased μ opioid receptor (MOR) phosphorylation and internalization after opioid treatment, affecting the β-arrestin2-dependent signaling pathway to regulate morphine tolerance. Importantly, the effect of ABIN-1 on morphine tolerance was abolished in β-arrestin2-knockout mice. Taken together, these results suggest that the interaction between ABIN-1 and β-arrestin2 inhibits MOR internalization to attenuate morphine tolerance, revealing a novel mechanism for MOR regulation. Hence, ABIN-1 may be a therapeutic target to regulate MOR internalization, thus providing a foundation for a novel treatment strategy for alleviating morphine tolerance and dependence. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: A20-binding inhibitor of nuclear factor-κB (ABIN-1) overexpression in the mouse brain attenuated morphine tolerance and dependence. The likely mechanism for this finding is that ABIN-1-β-arrestin2 complex formation facilitated β-arrestin2 degradation by ubiquitination. ABIN-1 targeted β-arrestin2 to regulate morphine tolerance. Therefore, the enhancement of ABIN-1 is an important strategy to prevent morphine tolerance and dependence.

Evaluation of the Antinociceptive, Antiallodynic, Antihyperalgesic and Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Polyalthic Acid

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are very commonly used, but their adverse effects warrant investigating new therapeutic alternatives. Polyalthic acid, a labdane-type diterpenoid, is known to produce gastroprotection, tracheal smooth muscle relaxation, and antitumoral, antiparasitic and antibacterial activity. This study aimed to evaluate the antinociceptive, antiallodynic, antihyperalgesic and anti-inflammatory effect of polyalthic acid on rats. Moreover, the effectiveness of treating hyperalgesia with a combination of polyalthic acid and naproxen was analyzed, as well as the type of drug-drug interaction involved. Nociception was examined by injecting 1% formalin into the right hind paw and thermal hyperalgesia and inflammation by injecting a 1% carrageenan solution into the left hind paw of rats. Allodynia was assessed on an L5/L6 spinal nerve ligation model. Polyalthic acid generated significant antinociceptive (56-320 mg/kg), antiallodynic (100-562 mg/kg), and antihyperalgesic and anti-inflammatory (10-178 mg/kg) effects. Antinociception mechanisms were explored by pretreating the rats with naltrexone, ODQ and methiothepin, finding the effect blocked by the former two compounds, which indicates the participation of opioid receptors and guanylate cyclase. An isobolographic analysis suggests synergism between polyalthic acid and naproxen in the combined treatment of hyperalgesia.

Neurod1 modulates opioid antinociceptive tolerance via two distinct mechanisms

BACKGROUND

The activity of neurogenic differentiation 1 (Neurod1) decreases after morphine administration, which leads to impairments of the stability of dendritic spines in primary hippocampal neurons, adult neurogenesis in mouse hippocampi, and drug-associated contextual memory. The current study examined whether Neurod1 could affect the development of opioid tolerance.

METHODS

Lentivirus encoding Neurod1, microRNA-190 (miR-190), or short hairpin RNA against Neurod1 was injected into mouse hippocampi separately or combined (more than eight mice for each treatment) to modulate NeuroD1 activity. The antinociceptive median effective dose values of morphine and fentanyl were determined with tail-flick assay and used to calculate development of tolerance. Contextual learning and memory were assayed using the Morris water maze.

RESULTS

Decrease in NeuroD1 activity increased the initial antinociceptive median effective dose values of both morphine and fentanyl, which was reversed by restoring NeuroD1 activity. In contrast, decrease in NeuroD1 activity inhibited development of tolerance in a time-dependent manner, paralleling its effects on the acquisition and extinction of contextual memory. In addition, only development of tolerance, but not antinociceptive median effective dose values, was modulated by the expression of miR-190 and Neurod1 driven by Nestin promoter.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurod1 regulates the developments of opioid tolerance via a time-dependent pathway through contextual learning and a short-response pathway through antinociception.

Nitric oxide mediates the beneficial effect of chronic naltrexone on cholestasis-induced memory impairment in male rats

Recent studies suggest an augmentation of endogenous opioids following bile duct ligation (BDL) and their pivotal role in the pathophysiology of cholestasis. In this study, the effect of naltrexone, an opioid receptor antagonist, was determined on cholestasis-induced memory impairment and the possible involvement of nitric oxide (NO) in this effect. Male Albino-Wistar rats were randomized to sham-operated and BDL-operated groups. In each group, animals were treated for up to 28 days with saline; naltrexone (10 mg/kg); naltrexone and N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), a nonselective nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor (3, 10 mg/kg); naltrexone and aminoguanidine, an inducible NOS inhibitor (100 mg/kg); or methylnaltrexone, a peripherally acting opioid receptor antagonist (3 mg/kg, intraperitoneal). Spatial recognition memory was determined in a Y-maze task on the day before surgery and days 7, 14, 21, and 28 after surgery. Memory performance was impaired 14 days after BDL in cholestatic rats and was significantly reversed by chronic treatment with naltrexone at days 14, 21, and 28 after BDL. On day 21 after BDL, chronic L-NAME produced only a nonsignificant decrease in the beneficial effect of naltrexone, whereas on day 28, chronic administration of both L-NAME and aminoguanidine significantly reversed this effect of naltrexone. It is therefore shown in this study that naltrexone improves BDL-induced memory deficit in rats. We conclude that the memory impairment in cholestatic rats might be because of an increase in the level of endogenous opioids and that naltrexone improved the spatial recognition memory by antagonizing opioid receptors. The observation that the procognitive effect of naltrexone is counteracted either by general inhibition of NOS enzymes or by selective inhibition of inducible NOS suggests the nitrergic pathway as a probable mechanism involved in the amelioration of spatial recognition memory by naltrexone in BDL rats.

Nitric oxide in the hippocampal cortical area interacts with naloxone in inducing pain

OBJECTIVE

Role of nitric oxide (NO) in reversing morphine anti-nociception has been shown. However, the interaction between NO and naloxone-induced pain in the hippocampus is unknown. The present study aimed to investigate the involvement of molecule NO in naloxone-induced pain and its possible interaction with naloxone into cortical area 1 (CA1) of hippocampus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Male Wistar rats (250-350 g), provided by Pasteur Institute of Iran, were housed two per cage with food and water ad libitum. The animals' skulls were cannulated bilaterally at coordinates adjusted for CA1 of hippocampus (AP: -3.8; L: ±1.8- 2.2: V: 3) by using stereotaxic apparatus. Each experimental group included 6-8 rats. To induce inflammation pain, the rats received subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of formalin (50 μL at 2.5%) once prior to testing. To evaluate the nociceptive effect of naloxone, the main narcotic antagonist of morphine (0.1-0.4 mg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) 10 min before injection of formalin. Injections of L-arginine, a precursor of NO, and N(G)-Nitro-L-arginine Methyl Ester (L-NAME), an inhibitor of NO synthase (NOS), intra-CA1, were conducted orderly prior to the administration of naloxone. The pain induction was analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA).

RESULTS

Naloxone at the lower doses caused a significant (P<0.01) pain in the naloxone-treated animals. However, pre-administration (1-2 min) of L-arginine (0.04, 0.08, 0.15, 0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 μg/rat, intra-CA1) reversed the response to naloxone. But, the response to L-arginine was blocked by pre-microinjection (1-2 min) of L-NAME (0.15, 0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 μg/rat), whilst, L-arginine or L-NAME alone did not induce pain behavior.

CONCLUSION

NO in the rat hippocampal CA1 area is involved in naloxone-induced nociception.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2011

This paper is the thirty-fourth consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system. It summarizes papers published during 2011 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (Section 2), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (Section 3); stress and social status (Section 4); tolerance and dependence (Section 5); learning and memory (Section 6); eating and drinking (Section 7); alcohol and drugs of abuse (Section 8); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (Section 9); mental illness and mood (Section 10); seizures and neurologic disorders (Section 11); electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (Section 12); general activity and locomotion (Section 13); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (Section 14); cardiovascular responses (Section 15); respiration (Section 16); and immunological responses (Section 17).