Effects of non-target leg activation, TMS coil orientation, and limb dominance on lower limb motor cortex excitability

Effects of DLPFC tDCS Followed by Treadmill Training on Dual-Task Gait and Cortical Excitability in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Gait disturbances are exacerbated in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) during dual-task walking (DTW). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to exert beneficial effects on gait performance and cortical excitability in PD; however, its combined effects with treadmill training (TT) remain undetermined.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of tDCS followed by TT on DTW performance and cortical excitability in individuals with PD.

METHODS

Thirty-four PD participants were randomized to dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) tDCS and TT group (DLPFC tDCS + TT group) or sham tDCS and TT group (sham tDCS + TT group) for 50 minutes per session (20 minutes tDCS followed by 30 minutes TT), 12 sessions within 5 weeks (2-3 sessions each week). Outcome measures included cognitive dual-task walking (CDTW), motor dual-task walking (MDTW), usual walking performance, cortical excitability, functional mobility, cognitive function, and quality of life.

RESULTS

The DLPFC tDCS + TT group exerted significantly greater improvement in CDTW velocity (P = .046), cadence (P = .043), and stride time (P = .041) compared to sham tDCS + TT group. In addition, DLPFC tDCS + TT group demonstrated a significant increase in resting motor threshold of stimulated hemisphere compared with sham tDCS + TT group (P = .026). However, no significant differences between groups were found in MDTW performance and other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Twelve-session DLPFC tDCS followed by TT significantly improved CDTW performance and decreased cortical excitability more than TT alone in individuals with PD. Applying DLPFC tDCS prior to TT could be suggested for gait rehabilitation in individuals with PD.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12622000101785.

Do lower limb motor-evoked potentials predict walking outcomes post-stroke?

BACKGROUND

This observational study examined whether lower limb (LL) motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) 1 week post-stroke predict recovery of independent walking, use of ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) or walking aid, at 3 and 6 months post-stroke.

METHODS

Non-ambulatory participants were recruited 5 days post-stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to determine tibialis anterior MEP status and clinical assessments (age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), ankle dorsiflexion strength, LL motricity index, Berg Balance Test) were completed 1 week post-stroke. Functional Ambulation Category (FAC), use of AFO and walking aid were assessed 3 months and 6 months post-stroke. MEP status, alone and combined with clinical measures, and walking outcomes at 3 and 6 months were analysed with Pearson χ2 and multivariate binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

Ninety participants were included (median age 72 years (38-97 years)). Most participants (81%) walked independently (FAC ≥ 4), 17% used an AFO, and 49% used a walking aid 3 months post-stroke with similar findings at 6 months. Independent walking was better predicted by age, LL strength and Berg Balance Test (accuracy 92%, 95% CI 85% to 97%) than MEP status (accuracy 73%, 95% CI 63% to 83%). AFO use was better predicted by NIHSS and MEP status (accuracy 88%, 95% CI 79% to 94%) than MEP status alone (accuracy 76%, 95% CI 65% to 84%). No variables predicted use of walking aids.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of LL MEPs 1-week post-stroke predicts independent walking at 3 and 6 months post-stroke. However, the absence of MEPs does not preclude independent walking. Clinical factors, particularly age, balance and stroke severity, more strongly predict independent walking than MEP status. LL MEP status adds little value as a biomarker for walking outcomes.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation input-output curve slope differences suggest variation in recruitment across muscle representations in primary motor cortex

Measurement of the input-output (IO) curves of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to assess corticospinal excitability and motor recruitment. While IO curves have been used to study disease and pharmacology, few studies have compared the IO curves across the body. This study sought to characterize IO curve parameters across the dominant and non-dominant sides of upper and lower limbs in healthy participants. Laterality preferences were assessed in eight healthy participants and IO curves were measured bilaterally for the first dorsal interosseous (FDI), biceps brachii (BB), and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles. Results show that FDI has lower motor threshold than BB which is, in turn, lower than TA. In addition, both BB and TA have markedly shallower logarithmic IO curve slopes from small to large MEP responses than FDI. After normalizing these slopes by their midpoints to account for differences in motor thresholds, which could result from geometric factors such as the target depth, large differences in logarithmic slopes remain present between all three muscles. The differences in slopes between the muscles could not be explained by differences in normalized IO curve spreads, which relate to the extent of the cortical representation and were comparable across the muscles. The IO curve differences therefore suggest muscle-dependent variations in TMS-evoked recruitment across the primary motor cortex, which should be considered when utilizing TMS-evoked MEPs to study disease states and treatment effects.

Case report: High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment of hereditary spastic paraplegia type 11

Hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) is a heterogeneous group of inherited neurodegenerative disorders that currently have no cure. HSP type 11 (SPG11-HSP) is a complex form carrying mutations in the SPG11 gene. Neuropathological studies demonstrate that motor deficits in these patients are mainly attributed to axonal degeneration of the corticospinal tract (CST). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive technique that can induce central nervous system plasticity and promote neurological recovery by modulating the excitability of cortical neuronal cells. Although rTMS is expected to be a therapeutic tool for neurodegenerative diseases, no previous studies have applied rTMS to treat motor symptoms in SPG11-HSP. Here, we report a case of SPG11-HSP with lower extremity spasticity and gait instability, which were improved by applying high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS) at the primary motor cortex (M1). Clinical and physiological features were measured throughout the treatment, including the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), the timed up and go (TUG) test and the 10-meter walk test time (10 MWT). The structure and excitability of the CST were assessed by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), respectively. After treatment, the patient gained 17 points of BBS, along with a gradual decrease in MAS scores of the bilateral lower extremity. In addition, the TUG test and 10 MWT improved to varying degrees. TMS assessment showed increased motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, decreased resting motor threshold (RMT), decreased central motor conduction time (CMCT), and decreased difference in the cortical silent period (CSP) between bilateral hemispheres. Using the DTI technique, we observed increased fractional anisotropy (FA) values and decreased mean diffusivity (MD) and radial diffusivity (RD) values in the CST. It suggests that applying HF-rTMS over the bilateral leg area of M1 (M1-LEG) is beneficial for SPG11-HSP. In this study, we demonstrate the potential of rTMS to promote neurological recovery from both functional and structural perspectives. It may provide a clinical rationale for using rTMS in the rehabilitation of HSP patients.

Corticospinal and spinal adaptations following lower limb motor skill training: a meta-analysis with best evidence synthesis

Motor skill training alters the human nervous system; however, lower limb motor tasks have been less researched compared to upper limb tasks. This meta-analysis with best evidence synthesis aimed to determine the cortical and subcortical responses that occur following lower limb motor skill training, and whether these responses are accompanied by improvements in motor performance. Following a literature search that adhered to the PRISMA guidelines, data were extracted and analysed from six studies (n = 172) for the meta-analysis, and 11 studies (n = 257) were assessed for the best evidence synthesis. Pooled data indicated that lower limb motor skill training increased motor performance, with a standardised mean difference (SMD) of 1.09 being observed. However, lower limb motor skill training had no effect on corticospinal excitability (CSE), Hoffmann's reflex (H-reflex) or muscle compound action potential (M_MAX) amplitude. The best evidence synthesis found strong evidence for improved motor performance and reduced short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI) following lower limb motor skill training, with conflicting evidence towards the modulation of CSE. Taken together, this review highlights the need for further investigation on how motor skill training performed with the lower limb musculature can modulate corticospinal responses. This will also help us to better understand whether these neuronal measures are underpinning mechanisms that support an improvement in motor performance.

An investigation of the control of quadriceps in people who are hypermobile; a case control design. Do the results impact our choice of exercise for people with symptomatic hypermobility?

Background

People with symptomatic hypermobility have altered proprioception however, the origin of this is unclear and needs further investigation to target rehabilitation appropriately. The objective of this investigation was to explore the corticospinal and reflex control of quadriceps and see if it differed between three groups of people: those who have symptomatic hypermobility, asymptomatic hypermobility and normal flexibility.

Methods

Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and Hoffman (H) reflexes of quadriceps were evoked in the three groups of people. The threshold and latency of MEPs and the slope of the input–output curves and the amplitude of MEPs and H reflexes were compared across the groups.

Results

The slope of the input–output curve created from MEPs as a result of TMS was steeper in people with symptomatic hypermobility when compared to asymptomatic and normally flexible people (p = 0.04). There were no other differences between the groups.

Conclusion

Corticospinal excitability and the excitability at the motoneurone pool are not likely candidates for the origin of proprioceptive loss in people with symptomatic hypermobility. This is discussed in the light of other work to suggest the receptor sitting in hypermobile connective tissue is a likely candidate. This suggests that treatment aimed at improving receptor responsiveness through increasing muscle tone, may be an effective rehabilitation strategy.

TMS intensity and focality correlation with coil orientation at three non-motor regions

Objective. The aim of this study is to define the best coil orientations for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for three clinically relevant brain areas: pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and posterior parietal cortex (PPC), by means of simulations in 12 realistic head models of the electric field (E-field). Methods. We computed the E-field generated by TMS in our three volumes of interest (VOI) that were delineated based on published atlases. We then analysed the maximum intensity and spatial focality for the normal and absolute components of the E-field considering different percentile thresholds. Lastly, we correlated these results with the different anatomical properties of our VOIs. Results. Overall, the spatial focality of the E-field for the three VOIs varied depending on the orientation of the coil. Further analysis showed that differences in individual brain anatomy were related to the amount of focality achieved. In general, a larger percentage of sulcus resulted in better spatial focality. Additionally, a higher normal E-field intensity was achieved when the coil axis was placed perpendicular to the predominant orientations of the gyri of each VOI. A positive correlation between spatial focality and E-field intensity was found for PPC and IFG but not for pre-SMA. Conclusions. For a rough approximation, better coil orientations can be based on the individual’s specific brain morphology at the VOI. Moreover, TMS computational models should be employed to obtain better coil orientations in non-motor regions of interest. Significance. Finding better coil orientations in non-motor regions is a challenge in TMS and seeks to reduce interindividual variability. Our individualized TMS simulation pipeline leads to fewer inter-individual variability in the focality, likely enhancing the efficacy of the stimulation and reducing the risk of stimulating adjacent, non-targeted areas.

Increased short interval intracortical inhibition in participants with previous hamstring strain injury

PURPOSE

Cortical mechanisms may contribute to weakness in participants with previous hamstring strain injury. This study aims to examine intra-cortical inhibition (SICI) and corticospinal excitability in previously injured participants.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, TMS was used to examine SICI, silent period, silent period: MEP ratios and area under the stimulus response curve in the biceps femoris and medial hamstrings. Comparisons were made between participants with (n = 10) and without (n = 10) previous hamstring strain injury. Motor threshold and isometric knee flexor strength were also compared between participants and the relationship between strength and SICI in control and previously injured participants was examined.

RESULTS

Isometric knee flexor strength was lower in previously injured limbs compared with control limbs (mean difference = - 41 Nm (- 26%) [95% CI = - 80 to - 2 Nm], p = 0.04, Cohen's d = - 1.27) and contralateral uninjured limbs (mean difference = - 23 Nm (- 17%), [95% CI = - 40 to - 6 Nm], p = 0.01, Cohen's d = - 0.57). Previously injured limbs exhibited smaller responses to paired pulse stimulation (i.e. greater levels of SICI) in the biceps femoris compared with control limbs (mean difference = - 19%, [95% CI = - 34 to - 5%], p = 0.007, Cohen's d = - 1.33). Isometric knee flexor strength was associated with the level of SICI recorded in the biceps femoris in previously injured participants (coefficient = 23 Nm [95% CI = 7-40 Nm], adjusted R² = 0.31, p = 0.01). There were no differences in markers of corticospinal excitability between previously injured and control limbs (all p > 0.24, all Cohen's d < 0.40).

CONCLUSION

Athletes with previous injury in the biceps femoris exhibit increased SICI in this muscle compared with control participants. Increased SICI is related to lower levels of hamstring strength, and rehabilitation programs targeting the removal of intra-cortical inhibition should be considered.

Motor Cortical Network Flexibility is Associated With Biomechanical Walking Impairment in Chronic Stroke

Background: The inability to flexibly modulate motor behavior with changes in task demand or environmental context is a pervasive feature of motor impairment and dysfunctional mobility after stroke. Objective: The purpose of this study was to test the reactive and modulatory capacity of lower-limb primary motor cortical (M1) networks using electroencephalography (EEG) measures of cortical activity evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and to evaluate their associations with clinical and biomechanical measures of walking function in chronic stroke. Methods: TMS assessments of motor cortex excitability were performed during rest and active ipsilateral plantarflexion in chronic stroke and age-matched controls. TMS-evoked motor cortical network interactions were quantified with simultaneous EEG as the post-TMS (0-300 ms) beta (15-30 Hz) coherence between electrodes overlying M1 bilaterally. We compared TMS-evoked coherence between groups during rest and active conditions and tested associations with poststroke motor impairment, paretic propulsive gait deficits, and the presence of paretic leg motor evoked potentials (MEPs). Results: Stroke (n = 14, 66 ± 9 years, F = 4) showed lower TMS-evoked cortical coherence and activity-dependent modulation compared to controls (n = 9, 68 ± 6 years, F = 3). Blunted reactivity and atypical modulation of TMS-evoked coherence were associated with lower paretic ankle moments for propulsive force generation during walking and absent paretic MEPs. Conclusions: Impaired flexibility of motor cortical networks to react to TMS and modulate during motor activity is distinctly associated with paretic limb biomechanical walking impairment, and may provide useful insight into the neuromechanistic underpinnings of chronic post-stroke mobility deficits.

Reliability of transcallosal inhibition measurements for the lower limb motor cortex in stroke

Transcallosal inhibition (TCI) is a measure of between-hemisphere inhibitory control that can be evaluated with the ipsilateral silent period (iSP) transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paradigm. The study of iSP for the lower extremity has been limited possibly due to the close orientation of the lower extremity motor representations. Change in TCI can provide insights into pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the asymmetry in corticomotor excitability in stroke. Here, we describe a method for iSP quantification and report reliability of iSP parameters for the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle in stroke. 26 individuals with stroke attended three sessions where single pulse TMS was used to measure TCI from the lesioned to non-lesioned hemisphere. A double cone coil was used for stimulating the ipsilateral motor cortex while the participant maintained an isometric contraction of the non-paretic TA. Absolute and relative reliability were computed for iSP latency, duration and area. iSP latency showed the lowest measurement error (absolute reliability) and iSP latency, duration and area showed good relative reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.6). This study suggests that iSP parameters for the tibialis anterior are reliable and attempts to provide a guideline for evaluating TCI for the lower extremity in stroke and other clinical populations.

Effect of conventional transcranial direct current stimulation devices and electrode sizes on motor cortical excitability of the quadriceps muscle

BACKGROUND

There is a growing concern among the scientific community that the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are highly variable across studies. The use of different tDCS devices and electrode sizes may contribute to this variability; however, this issue has not been verified experimentally.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of tDCS device and electrode size on quadriceps motor cortical excitability.

METHODS

The effect of tDCS device and electrode size on quadriceps motor cortical excitability was quantified across a range of TMS intensities using a novel evoked torque approach that has been previously shown to be highly reliable. In experiment 1, anodal tDCS-induced excitability changes were measured in twenty individuals using two devices (Empi and Soterix) on two separate days. In experiment 2, anodal tDCS-induced excitability changes were measured in thirty individuals divided into three groups based on the electrode size. A novel Bayesian approach was used in addition to the classical hypothesis testing during data analyses.

RESULTS

There were no significant main or interaction effects, indicating that cortical excitability did not differ between different tDCS devices or electrode sizes. The lack of pre-post time effect in both experiments indicated that cortical excitability was minimally affected by anodal tDCS. Bayesian analyses indicated that the null model was more favored than the main or the interaction effects model.

CONCLUSIONS

Motor cortical excitability was not altered by anodal tDCS and did not differ by devices or electrode sizes used in the study. Future studies should examine if behavioral outcomes are different based on tDCS device or electrode size.

TMS-induced silent periods: A review of methods and call for consistency

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced silent periods provide an in vivo measure of human motor cortical inhibitory function. Cortical silent periods (cSP, also sometimes referred to as contralateral silent periods) and ipsilateral silent periods (iSP) may change with advancing age and disease and can provide insight into cortical control of the motor system. The majority of past silent period work has implemented largely varying methodology, sometimes including subjective analyses and incomplete methods descriptions. This limits reproducibility of silent period work and hampers comparisons of silent period measures across studies. Here, we discuss methodological differences in past silent period work, highlighting how these choices affect silent period outcome measures. We also outline challenges and possible solutions for measuring silent periods in the unique case of the lower limbs. Finally, we provide comprehensive recommendations for collection, analysis, and reporting of future silent period studies.

TMS coil orientation and muscle activation influence lower limb intracortical excitability

INTRODUCTION

Previous research with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) indicates that coil orientation (TMS current direction) and muscle activation state (rest or active) modify corticospinal and intracortical excitability of upper limb muscles. However, the extent to which these factors influence corticospinal and intracortical excitability of lower limb muscles is unknown. This study aimed to examine how variations in coil orientation and muscle activation affect corticospinal and intracortical excitability of tibialis anterior (TA), a lower leg muscle.

METHODS

In 21 young (21.6 ± 3.3 years, 11 female) adults, TMS was administered to the motor cortical representation of TA in posterior-anterior (PA) and mediolateral (ML) orientations at rest and during muscle activation. Single-pulse TMS measures of motor evoked potential amplitude, in addition to resting and active motor thresholds, were used to index corticospinal excitability, whereas paired-pulse TMS measures of short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF), and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI), were used to assess excitability of intracortical circuits.

RESULTS

For single-pulse TMS, motor thresholds and test TMS intensity were lower for ML stimulation (all P < 0.05). In a resting muscle, ML TMS produced greater SICI (P < 0.001) and less SICF (both P < 0.05) when compared with PA TMS. In contrast, ML TMS in an active muscle resulted in reduced SICI but increased SICF (both P ≤ 0.001) when compared with PA TMS.

CONCLUSION

TMS coil orientation and muscle activation influence measurements of intracortical excitability recorded in the tibialis anterior, and are therefore important considerations in TMS studies of lower limb muscles.

Assessment of vestibulocortical interactions during standing in healthy subjects

The vestibular system is essential to produce adequate postural responses enabling voluntary movement. However, how the vestibular system influences corticospinal output during postural tasks is still unknown. Here, we examined the modulation exerted by the vestibular system on corticospinal output during standing. Healthy subjects (n = 25) maintained quiet standing, head facing forward with eyes closed. Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) was applied bipolarly and binaurally at different delays prior to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) which triggered motor evoked potentials (MEPs). With the cathode right/anode left configuration, MEPs in right Soleus (SOL) muscle were significantly suppressed when GVS was applied at ISI = 40 and 130ms before TMS. With the anode right/cathode left configuration, no significant changes were observed. Changes in the MEP amplitude were then compared to changes in the ongoing EMG when GVS was applied alone. Only the decrease in MEP amplitude at ISI = 40ms occurred without change in the ongoing EMG, suggesting that modulation occurred at a premotoneuronal level. We further investigated whether vestibular modulation could occur at the motor cortex level by assessing changes in the direct corticospinal pathways using the short-latency facilitation of the SOL Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex) by TMS. None of the observed modulation occurred at the level of motor cortex. Finally, using the long-latency facilitation of the SOL H-reflex, we were able to confirm that the suppression of MEP at ISI = 40ms occurred at a premotoneuronal level. The data indicate that vestibular signals modulate corticospinal output to SOL at both premotoneuronal and motoneuronal levels during standing.

Rotational field TMS: Comparison with conventional TMS based on motor evoked potentials and thresholds in the hand and leg motor cortices

BACKGROUND

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a rapidly expanding technology utilized in research and neuropsychiatric treatments. Yet, conventional TMS configurations affect primarily neurons that are aligned parallel to the induced electric field by a fixed coil, making the activation orientation-specific. A novel method termed rotational field TMS (rfTMS), where two orthogonal coils are operated with a 90° phase shift, produces rotation of the electric field vector over almost a complete cycle, and may stimulate larger portion of the neuronal population within a given brain area.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the physiological effects of rfTMS and conventional unidirectional TMS (udTMS) in the motor cortex.

METHODS

Hand and leg resting motor thresholds (rMT), and motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes and latencies (at 120% of rMT), were measured using a dual-coil array based on the H7-coil, in 8 healthy volunteers following stimulation at different orientations of either udTMS or rfTMS.

RESULTS

For both target areas rfTMS produced significantly lower rMTs and much higher MEPs than those induced by udTMS, for comparable induced electric field amplitude. Both hand and leg rMTs were orientation-dependent.

CONCLUSIONS

rfTMS induces stronger physiologic effects in targeted brain regions at significantly lower intensities. Importantly, given the activation of a much larger population of neurons within a certain brain area, repeated application of rfTMS may induce different neuroplastic effects in neural networks, opening novel research and clinical opportunities.

Characterization of stimulus response curves obtained with transcranial magnetic stimulation from bilateral tibialis anterior muscles post stroke

BACKGROUND

Stimulus response curves (SR curves), measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) induced motor evoked potentials (MEP), yield important information regarding corticomotor connectivity. Limited understanding of SR curve analyses techniques for leg muscles after stroke may limit the utility of TMS data for walking recovery.

OBJECTIVE

To compare linear and non-linear curve fitting for MEP responses from the non-paretic and paretic tibialis anterior (TA) muscles.

METHODS

Accuracy of fit was measured using coefficient of determination (R2). Similarities of the fit were compared using slopes and area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The non-linear function demonstrated higher R2 and slopes. The AUC was not significantly different between the two analyses approaches. The non-linear non-paretic SR slopes and paretic AUC had significant associations with walking speed.

CONCLUSION

Our results highlight the differences between non-linear and linear approaches to best fit the SR curves from bilateral TA muscles in stroke survivors. Although the linear function can appropriately fit the SR curve of the paretic and non-paretic TA, the non-linear function estimated a higher slope. We found the AUC to be a more robust measure that was not affected by the type of curve-fitting approach and only the AUC of the paretic TA showed significant association with walking speeds. A better understanding of SR curve fitting approaches for the TA muscles in individuals with chronic stroke allows for their optimal use in interpretation of TMS data and literature.

Agonist-Antagonist Coactivation Enhances Corticomotor Excitability of Ankle Muscles

Spinal pathways underlying reciprocal flexion-extension contractions have been well characterized, but the extent to which cortically evoked motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) are influenced by antagonist muscle activation remains unclear. A majority of studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation- (TMS-) evoked MEPs to evaluate the excitability of the corticospinal pathway focus on upper extremity muscles. Due to functional and neural control differences between lower and upper limb muscles, there is a need to evaluate methodological factors influencing TMS-evoked MEPs specifically in lower limb musculature. If and to what extent the activation of the nontargeted muscles, such as antagonists, affects TMS-evoked MEPs is poorly understood, and such gaps in our knowledge may limit the rigor and reproducibility of TMS studies. Here, we evaluated the effect of the activation state of the antagonist muscle on TMS-evoked MEPs obtained from the target (agonist) ankle muscle for both tibialis anterior (TA) and soleus muscles. Fourteen able-bodied participants (11 females, age: 26.1 ± 4.1 years) completed one experimental session; data from 12 individuals were included in the analysis. TMS was delivered during 4 conditions: rest, TA activated, soleus activated, and TA and soleus coactivation. Three pairwise comparisons were made for MEP amplitude and coefficient of variability (CV): rest versus coactivation, rest versus antagonist activation, and agonist activation versus coactivation. We demonstrated that agonist-antagonist coactivation enhanced MEP amplitude and reduced MEP CVs for both TA and soleus muscles. Our results provide methodological considerations for future TMS studies and pave the way for future exploration of coactivation-dependent modulation of corticomotor excitability in pathological cohorts such as stroke or spinal cord injury.

Mobile Application for Adaptive Threshold Hunting in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is expanding with many studies applying adaptive threshold hunting to determine a motor threshold (MT). In addition to being a measure of corticospinal excitability, the MT is used as a baseline stimulation intensity (SI) to which following investigative or modulatory SIs are referenced to. Currently available tools for determining MTs include system-integrated tools and third-party stand-alone software. System-integrated MT-tools are still rarely available and the stand-alone software usually demand a separate computer, and hence possess additional space-requirements. I introduce and validate a free Android-based mobile application ("ATH-tool") for adaptive threshold hunting of the MT. The objective is to allow for a simple and validated recording of MTs with sharing capabilities for logs. For comparison, I applied Motor Threshold Assessment Tool 2.0, to compare the MT-values determined with the new application, as it applies closely the same routine. Computational validation with known true threshold values confirmed that the new application captured the true MT at high precision (error ≤ 0.9%). Previously published data on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were used to simulate realistic response occurrence by considering experimental data from 15 healthy subjects at different stimulation intensities. The MTs of the different methods agreed well (ICC ≥ 0.971, ). There was no significant difference between the MTs determined with the different methods ( p ≥ 0.151 ). The novel mobile application should make it easier for researchers and clinicians to determine MTs and log the results.

Corticospinal excitability of tibialis anterior and soleus differs during passive ankle movement

The purpose of this study was to assess corticospinal excitability of soleus (SOL) and tibialis anterior (TA) at a segmental level during passive ankle movement. Four experimental components were performed to assess the effects of passive ankle movement and muscle length on corticospinal excitability (MEP/M_max) at different muscle lengths, subcortical excitability at the level of lumbar spinal segments (LEP/M_max), intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (ICF), and H-reflex in SOL and TA. In addition, the degree of fascicle length changes between SOL and TA was assessed in a subpopulation during passive ankle movement. Fascicles shortened and lengthened with joint movement during passive shortening and lengthening of SOL and TA to a similar degree (p < 0.001). Resting motor threshold was greater in SOL compared to TA (p ≤ 0.014). MEP/M_max was facilitated in TA during passive shortening relative to the static position (p ≤ 0.023) and passive lengthening (p ≤ 0.001), but remained similar during passive ankle movement in SOL (p ≥ 0.497), regardless of muscle length at the point of stimulus (p = 0.922). LEP/M_max (SOL: p = 0.075, TA: p = 0.071), SICI (SOL: p = 0.427, TA: p = 0.540), and ICF (SOL: p = 0.177, TA: p = 0.777) remained similar during passive ankle movement. H-reflex was not different across conditions in TA (p = 0.258), but was reduced during passive lengthening compared to shortening in SOL (p = 0.048). These results suggest a differential modulation of corticospinal excitability between plantar and dorsiflexors during passive movement. The corticospinal behaviour observed might be mediated by an increase in corticospinal drive as a result of reduced afferent input during muscle shortening and appears to be flexor-biased.

The effect of coil type and limb dominance in the assessment of lower-limb motor cortex excitability using TMS

PURPOSE

Clinical application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has rapidly increased but the majority of studies have targeted upper limb muscles, with few exploring the lower-limb. Differences of coil choice have added to methodological difficulties of lower-limb studies and have challenged consistent interpretation of these parameters. The aims of this study were to determine the optimal coil choice for assessing lower-limb cortical excitability and assess laterality of normal cortical function.

METHODS

69 recordings were undertaken from the tibialis anterior muscle from 48 healthy participants. Three coil types currently used in lower-limb studies (90 mm circular; 70 mm figure-of-8; and 110 mm double cone) were explored using single pulse TMS and paired-pulse threshold tracking TMS (TT-TMS) paradigms, with peripheral function also assessed. Cortical symmetry was ascertained with bilateral recordings (dominant versus non-dominant muscles).

RESULTS

The double-cone coil showed greatest efficacy, with significantly lower resting motor thresholds (49.0 ± 2.3%, p<0.0005) and greater intracortical facilitation compared to the alternate coil choices. Using the double-cone coil, paired-pulse TT-TMS generated an averaged short interval intracortical inhibition of 11.3 ± 1.2%, with an averaged intracortical facilitation of -6.1 ± 1.9%. There were no differences between dominant and non-dominant hemispheres.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study identified key differences in cortical parameters between the currently utilised coils for lower-limb TMS. Specifically, this indicates the importance of standardizing the lower-limb TMS protocol, particularly for accurate interpretation in disease pathology.

The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to evaluate cortical excitability of lower limb musculature: Challenges and opportunities

Neuroplasticity is a fundamental yet relatively unexplored process that can impact rehabilitation of lower extremity (LE) movements. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has gained widespread application as a non-invasive brain stimulation technique for evaluating neuroplasticity of the corticospinal pathway. However, a majority of TMS studies have been performed on hand muscles, with a paucity of TMS investigations focused on LE muscles. This perspective review paper proposes that there are unique methodological challenges associated with using TMS to evaluate corticospinal excitability of lower limb muscles. The challenges include: (1) the deeper location of the LE motor homunculus; (2) difficulty with targeting individual LE muscles during TMS; and (3) differences in corticospinal circuity controlling upper and lower limb muscles. We encourage future investigations that modify traditional methodological approaches to help address these challenges. Systematic TMS investigations are needed to determine the extent of overlap in corticomotor maps for different LE muscles. A simple, yet informative methodological solution involves simultaneous recordings from multiple LE muscles, which will provide the added benefit of observing how other relevant muscles co-vary in their responses during targeted TMS assessment directed toward a specific muscle. Furthermore, conventionally used TMS methods (e.g., determination of hot spot location and motor threshold) may need to be modified for TMS studies involving LE muscles. Additional investigations are necessary to determine the influence of testing posture as well as activation state of adjacent and distant LE muscles on TMS-elicited responses. An understanding of these challenges and solutions specific to LE TMS will improve the ability of neurorehabilitation clinicians to interpret TMS literature, and forge novel future directions for neuroscience research focused on elucidating neuroplasticity processes underlying locomotion and gait training.

Effects of posture and coactivation on corticomotor excitability of ankle muscles

BACKGROUND

The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to evaluate corticomotor excitability of lower limb (LL) muscles can provide insights about neuroplasticity mechanisms underlying LL rehabilitation. However, to date, a majority of TMS studies have focused on upper limb muscles. Posture-related activation is an important under-investigated factor influencing corticomotor excitability of LL muscles.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate effects of posture and background activation on corticomotor excitability of ankle muscles.

METHODS

Fourteen young neurologically-unimpaired participants (26.1±4.1 years) completed the study. TMS-evoked motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the tibialis anterior (TA) and soleus during 4 conditions - standing, standing coactivation, sitting, and sitting coactivation. TA and soleus MEP amplitudes were compared during: (1) standing versus sitting;(2) standing coactivation (standing while activating both TA and soleus) versus sitting coactivation; and (3) standing coactivation versus standing. For each comparison, background EMG for TA and soleus were matched. Trial-to-trial coefficient of variation of MEP amplitude and coil-positioning errors were additional dependent variables.

RESULTS

No differences were observed in TA or soleus MEP amplitudes during standing versus sitting. Compared to sitting coactivation, larger MEPs were observed during standing coactivation for soleus but not TA. Compared to standing, the standing coactivation task demonstrated larger MEPs and reduced trial-to-trial MEP variability.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that incorporation of measurements in standing in future TMS studies may provide novel insights into neural circuits controlling LL muscles. Standing and standing coactivation tasks may be beneficial for obtaining functionally-relevant neuroplasticity assessments of LL musculature.

The TWIST Algorithm Predicts Time to Walking Independently After Stroke

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The likelihood of regaining independent walking after stroke is of concern to patients and their families and influences hospital discharge planning. The objective of this study was to explore factors that could be combined in an algorithm for predicting whether and when a patient will walk independently after stroke.

METHODS

Adults with new lower limb weakness were recruited within 3 days of having a stroke. Clinical assessment, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and magnetic resonance imaging were completed 1 to 2 weeks poststroke. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was used to identify factors that predicted whether a patient achieved independent walking by 6 or 12 weeks, or remained dependent at 12 weeks.

RESULTS

We recruited 41 patients (24 women; median age 72 years, range 43-96 years). The CART analysis results were used to create the Time to Walking Independently after STroke (TWIST) algorithm, which made accurate predictions for 95% of patients. Patients with a trunk control test score >40 at 1 week walked independently within 6 weeks. Patients with a trunk control test score <40 only achieved independent walking by 12 weeks if they also had hip extension strength of Medical Research Council grade 3 or more. Neurophysiological and neuroimaging measures did not predict independent walking after stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

In this exploratory study, the TWIST algorithm accurately predicted whether and when an individual patient walked independently after stroke using simple bedside measures 1 week poststroke. Further work is required to develop and validate this algorithm in a larger study.

Proportional Recovery From Lower Limb Motor Impairment After Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In people with preserved corticospinal tract (CST) function after stroke, upper limb impairment resolves by ≈70% within 3 months. This is known as the proportional recovery rule. Patients without CST function do not fit this rule and have worse upper limb outcomes. This study investigated resolution of motor impairment in the lower limb (LL).

METHODS

Patients with stroke and LL weakness were assessed 3 days and 3 months after stroke with the LL Fugl-Meyer. CST integrity was determined in a subset of patients using transcranial magnetic stimulation to test for LL motor-evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging to measure CST lesion load. Linear regression analyses were conducted to predict resolution of motor impairment (ΔFugl-Meyer) including factors initial impairment, motor-evoked potential status, CST lesion load, and LL therapy dose.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients completed 3-month follow-up and recovered 74% (95% confidence interval, 60%-88%) of initial LL motor impairment. Initial impairment was the only significant predictor of resolution of motor impairment. There was no identifiable cluster of patients who did not fit the proportional recovery rule. Measures of CST integrity did not predict proportional LL recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

LL impairment resolves by ≈70% within 3 months after stroke. The absence of a nonfitter group may be because of differences in the neuroanatomical organization of descending motor tracts to the upper limb and LL. Proportional recovery of the LL is not influenced by therapy dose providing further evidence that it reflects a fundamental biological process.