1
|
Graetz I, Hu X, Kocak M, Krukowski RA, Anderson JN, Waters TM, Curry AN, Robles A, Paladino A, Stepanski E, Vidal GA, Schwartzberg LS. Remote Monitoring App for Endocrine Therapy Adherence Among Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2417873. [PMID: 38935379 PMCID: PMC11211959 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) use among women with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer reduces the risk of cancer recurrence, but its adverse symptoms contribute to lower adherence. Objective To test whether remote monitoring of symptoms and treatment adherence with or without tailored text messages improves outcomes among women with breast cancer who are prescribed AET. Design, Setting, and Participants This nonblinded, randomized clinical trial (RCT) following intention-to-treat principles included English-speaking women with early-stage breast cancer prescribed AET at a large cancer center with 14 clinics across 3 states from November 15, 2018, to June 11, 2021. All participants had a mobile device with a data plan and an email address and were asked to use an electronic pillbox to monitor AET adherence and to complete surveys at enrollment and 1 year. Interventions Participants were randomized into 3 groups: (1) an app group, in which participants received instructions for and access to the study adherence and symptom monitoring app for 6 months; (2) an app plus feedback group, in which participants received additional weekly text messages about managing symptoms, adherence, and communication; or (3) an enhanced usual care (EUC) group. App-reported missed doses, increases in symptoms, and occurrence of severe symptoms triggered follow-ups from the oncology team. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was 1-year, electronic pillbox-captured AET adherence. Secondary outcomes included symptom management abstracted from the medical record, as well as patient-reported health care utilization, symptom burden, quality of life, physician communication, and self-efficacy for managing symptoms. Results Among 304 female participants randomized (app group, 98; app plus feedback group, 102; EUC group, 104), the mean (SD) age was 58.6 (10.8) years (median, 60 years; range, 31-83 years), and 60 (19.7%) had an educational level of high school diploma or less. The study completion rate was 87.5% (266 participants). There were no statistically significant differences by treatment group in AET adherence (primary outcome): 76.6% for EUC, 73.4% for the app group (difference vs EUC, -3.3%; 95% CI, -11.4% to 4.9%; P = .43), and 70.9% for the app plus feedback group (difference vs EUC, -5.7%; 95% CI, -13.8% to 2.4%; P = .17). At the 1-year follow-up, app plus feedback participants had fewer total health care encounters (adjusted difference, -1.23; 95% CI, -2.03 to -0.43; P = .003), including high-cost encounters (adjusted difference, -0.40; 95% CI, -0.67 to -0.14; P = .003), and office visits (adjusted difference, -0.82; 95% CI, -1.54 to -0.09; P = .03) over the previous 6 months compared with EUC participants. Conclusions and Relevance This RCT found that a remote monitoring app with alerts to the patient's care team and tailored text messages to patients did not improve AET adherence among women with early-stage breast cancer; however, it reduced overall and high-cost health care encounters and office visits without affecting quality of life. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03592771.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilana Graetz
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Xin Hu
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville
| | - Mehmet Kocak
- International School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Rebecca A. Krukowski
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville
| | - Janeane N. Anderson
- Department of Community and Population Health, College of Nursing, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis
| | | | - Andrea N. Curry
- West Cancer Center and Research Institute, Germantown, Tennessee
| | - Andrew Robles
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrew Paladino
- College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis
| | | | - Gregory A. Vidal
- West Cancer Center and Research Institute, Germantown, Tennessee
- College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis
| | - Lee S. Schwartzberg
- Pennington Cancer Institute, Renown Health, Reno, Nevada
- Department of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Agnew S, Crawford M, MacPherson I, Shiramizu V, Fleming L. The impact of symptom clusters on endocrine therapy adherence in patients with breast cancer. Breast 2024; 75:103731. [PMID: 38599048 PMCID: PMC11017041 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND When taken as prescribed, endocrine therapy is effective in reducing risk of recurrence and mortality in the treatment of patients with breast cancer. However, treatment side effects can act as a barrier to medication adherence. Existing research has not identified any specific side effects as consistent predictors of nonadherence. Our aim was to explore the influence of symptom clusters on self-reported adherence in patients with breast cancer. METHODS A cross-sectional online survey was conducted, including patients with breast cancer currently or previously prescribed endocrine therapy (N = 1051). This included measures of self-reported endocrine therapy adherence and common symptoms among this population (insomnia, depression, anxiety, fatigue, musculoskeletal, and vasomotor symptoms). RESULTS Unintentional nonadherence was higher than intentional nonadherence (50.8 % vs 31.01 %). The most troublesome symptom was insomnia (73.83 % displayed probable insomnia disorder). K-means cluster analysis identified 2 symptom clusters: overall High symptoms, and overall Low symptoms. Participants in the Low symptoms cluster were significantly more likely to be classed as adherent based on unintentional and intentional items. CONCLUSIONS Nonadherence was high in the current sample, and significantly more likely in participants reporting overall severe symptoms. Clinicians should be aware of the scale of common side effects and facilitate open conversation about potential barriers to adherence. Follow-up care should include assessment of common symptoms and signpost patients to appropriate support or treatment when required. Future research should explore potential for a central symptom to act as a target for intervention, to relieve overall side effect burden and facilitate better medication adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sommer Agnew
- University of Strathclyde, 16 Richmond St, Glasgow, G1 1XQ, Scotland, UK.
| | - Megan Crawford
- University of Strathclyde, 16 Richmond St, Glasgow, G1 1XQ, Scotland, UK.
| | | | - Victor Shiramizu
- University of Strathclyde, 16 Richmond St, Glasgow, G1 1XQ, Scotland, UK.
| | - Leanne Fleming
- University of Strathclyde, 16 Richmond St, Glasgow, G1 1XQ, Scotland, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baković M, Bago M, Benić L, Krajinović M, Silovski T, Plavetić ND, Turković L, Sertić M, Hadžiabdić MO. Exploring adherence in patients with advanced breast cancer: focus on CDK4/6 inhibitors. ACTA PHARMACEUTICA (ZAGREB, CROATIA) 2023; 73:633-654. [PMID: 38147481 DOI: 10.2478/acph-2023-0045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
Treatment adherence is crucial for optimal outcomes in advanced breast cancer, but can be challenging due to various factors, i.e. patients' attitudes and behavior upon diagnosis, and complex therapies with high adverse effect rates. Our aim was to explore the adherence to oral anticancer medications (OAM) in women with advanced breast cancer, focusing on cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDKI), and identify factors associated with the adherence. We conducted a cross-sectional study at the University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Croatia, involving women with stage IV advanced breast cancer receiving OAM. Data collection included a questionnaire assessing socio-demographic and clinical information, Beck Depression Inventory-II for depressive symptoms, Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5) for adherence to OAM, and Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire. Plasma concentrations of CDKI were confirmed by LC-MS/MS in three randomly selected participants. A total of 89 women were included. The most prescribed OAMs were anti-estrogen (71.3 %) and CDKI (60.9 %). MARS-5 scores (mean: 24.1 ± 1.6) correlated with CDKI plasma concentrations. Forgetfulness was the primary reason for non-adherence (25.9 %). Women receiving CDKI (p = 0.018), without depressive symptomatology (p = 0.043), and with more positive beliefs about medicines were more adherent (p < 0.05). This study enhances understanding of medication adherence in advanced breast cancer and identifies influential factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matea Baković
- 1University of Zagreb, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Martina Bago
- 2Andrija Štampar Teaching Institute of Public Health 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Lucija Benić
- 1University of Zagreb, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Magdalena Krajinović
- 1University of Zagreb, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Tajana Silovski
- 3University Hospital Centre, Department of Oncology 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
- 4University of Zagreb School of Medicine 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Natalija Dedić Plavetić
- 3University Hospital Centre, Department of Oncology 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
- 4University of Zagreb School of Medicine 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Lu Turković
- 1University of Zagreb, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Miranda Sertić
- 1University of Zagreb, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Smith KL, Tsai HL, Lim D, Wang C, Nunes R, Wilkinson MJ, Sheng JY, Couzi R, Fetting J, Riley C, Wolff AC, Santa-Maria CA, Papathakis K, Collins-Chase L, Hilton C, Thorner E, Montanari A, Ikejiani D, Snyder C, Stearns V. Feasibility of Symptom Monitoring During the First Year of Endocrine Therapy for Early Breast Cancer Using Patient-Reported Outcomes Collected via Smartphone App. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:981-989. [PMID: 37733984 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment-associated symptoms drive early discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) for breast cancer. We hypothesized that symptom monitoring with electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) during adjuvant ET will enhance symptom detection, symptom management, and persistence. METHODS Eligible patients were initiating ET for stage 0-III breast cancer. Participants completed ePRO surveys via smartphone at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Measures included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, and Vaginal Discomfort; plus Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events items assessing joint pain, hot flashes, vaginal dryness, concentration problems, and memory problems. Scores surpassing prespecified thresholds triggered alerts, and recommended symptom management pathways were provided to clinicians. The primary objective was to evaluate feasibility, assessed by survey completion rates, with targets of >65% for the baseline survey and ≥1 follow-up survey during the first 6 months. Secondary objectives included 12-month ET discontinuation rate (target: ≤15%), describing symptoms and evaluating pathway implementation. RESULTS Among 250 participants, 73.2% completed the baseline survey and 69.6% completed ≥1 follow-up survey during the first 6 months. Thirty-one percent of participants had ≥1 symptom alert at baseline and 74% had ≥1 symptom alert during follow-up. The proportions of participants for whom pathway-concordant symptom management was documented at each time point ranged from 12.8% to 36.6%. Twenty-eight participants (11.2%) discontinued ET by 12 months. CONCLUSION Symptom monitoring with ePROs during adjuvant ET is feasible. Despite infrequent documentation of pathway-concordant symptom management after symptom alerts, ePROs were associated with favorable short-term ET persistence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Lisa Smith
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD
| | - Hua-Ling Tsai
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - David Lim
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
- Division of Statistics Collaborative Inc, WCG, Washington, DC
| | - Chenguang Wang
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY
| | - Raquel Nunes
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD
| | - Mary J Wilkinson
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jennifer Y Sheng
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Rima Couzi
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - John Fetting
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Carol Riley
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Antonio C Wolff
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Cesar A Santa-Maria
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Katie Papathakis
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Christie Hilton
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Elissa Thorner
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Amanda Montanari
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Claire Snyder
- Johns Hopkins Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Vered Stearns
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ivory J, Wheeler SB, Drier S, Gunn H, Zahrieh D, Paskett E, Naughton M, Wills R, Swetel K, Chow S, Reeder-Hayes K. Randomized phase III trial evaluating motivational interviewing and text interventions to optimize adherence to breast cancer endocrine therapy (Alliance A191901): the GETSET protocol. Trials 2023; 24:664. [PMID: 37828596 PMCID: PMC10568920 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07672-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hormone receptor-positive (HR +) breast cancer is the most common type of breast cancer in the USA but has excellent long-term outcomes in recent decades, in part due to effective oral endocrine therapy (ET). ET medications are typically prescribed for 5 to 10 years, depending on the risk of recurrence, and must be taken daily. One limiting factor to ET efficacy is nonadherence, with high-risk groups for nonadherence including younger women and Black women. METHODS The Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (Alliance) trial A191901 is an ongoing, four-arm (text message reminder (TMR), motivational interviewing (MI), TMR plus MI, or enhanced usual care) randomized clinical trial that tests the efficacy and effect of two interventions (TMR and/or MI) on improved ET adherence, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and resource use requirements among HR + breast cancer survivors. Participants are randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to the four arms. With an assumed loss to follow-up of approximately 11%, we plan to recruit 1180 participants. Randomization is stratified based on age and race to ensure balance between the arms, and we oversample younger and Black women, with each group representing 30% of the study population. Participants randomized to an intervention will actively participate in the intervention for 9 months, and all participants will be followed for adherence data and PRO endpoints, through the use of the Pillsy cap medication event monitoring system and Alliance ePRO survey app (i.e., Patient Cloud). The primary analysis will compare Pillsy-measured ET adherence among study arms at 12 months. DISCUSSION This multisite study will not only define strategies to improve adherence to breast cancer oral therapies, but it will also potentially support strategies in large cooperative research groups that can increase delivery and tolerability of ET, involve diverse patient populations in clinical research, and engage patients effectively in interventional studies, using remote and cost-effective delivery methods. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04379570 . Registered on 7 May 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joannie Ivory
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
- , Chapel Hill, USA.
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- , Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Sarah Drier
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- , Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Heather Gunn
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- , Rochester, USA
| | - David Zahrieh
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- , Rochester, USA
| | | | | | - Rachel Wills
- University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- , Chicago, USA
| | - Kayla Swetel
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
- , Columbus, USA
| | - Selina Chow
- , Chicago, USA
- Alliance Operations Office, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yang S, Park SW, Bae SJ, Ahn SG, Jeong J, Park K. Investigation of Factors Affecting Adherence to Adjuvant Hormone Therapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients: A Comprehensive Systematic Review. J Breast Cancer 2023; 26:309-333. [PMID: 37272247 PMCID: PMC10475712 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Adherence and persistence to adjuvant hormone therapy (AHT) are seldom maintained among early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC) survivors, despite the significant clinical benefits of long-term AHT. As the factors influencing adherence to AHT remain unclear, this study aimed to comprehensively identify such factors and classify them into specific dimensions. METHODS PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were searched for qualified articles. The search mainly focused on three components: early-stage (0-III) BC, oral AHT administration, and adherence to AHT, with keywords derived from MeSH and entry terms. The factors identified were then classified into six categories based on a modified WHO multidimensional model. RESULTS Overall, 146 studies were included; the median sample size was 651 (range, 31-40,009), and the mean age of the population was 61.5 years (standard deviation, 8.3 years). Patient- and therapy-related factors were the most frequently investigated factors. Necessity/concern beliefs and self-efficacy among patient-related factors were consistently related to better adherence than depression. Although drug side effects and medication use cannot be modified easily, a refined prescription strategy for the initiation and switching of AHT is likely to increase adherence levels. CONCLUSION An effective psychological program that encourages positive views and beliefs about medication and management strategies for each therapy may be necessary to improve adherence to AHT. Social support and a sense of belonging can be enhanced through community participation and social media for better adherence to AHT. Patient-centered communication and appropriate recommendations by physicians may be attributable to better adherence outcomes. Findings from systematically organized factors that influence adherence to AHT may contribute to the establishment of intervention strategies to benefit patients with early-stage BC to achieve optimal health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seongwoo Yang
- HERINGS, The Institute of Advanced Clinical & Biomedical Research, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Won Park
- HERINGS, The Institute of Advanced Clinical & Biomedical Research, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soong June Bae
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine/Institute for Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Gwe Ahn
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine/Institute for Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine/Institute for Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyounghoon Park
- HERINGS, The Institute of Advanced Clinical & Biomedical Research, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Smith SG, Green SMC, Ellison R, Foy R, Graham CD, Mason E, French DP, Hall LH, Wilkes H, McNaught E, Raine E, Walwyn R, Howdon D, Clark J, Rousseau N, Buxton J, Moore SJL, Parbutt C, Velikova G, Farrin A, Collinson M. Refining and optimising a behavioural intervention to support endocrine therapy adherence (ROSETA) in UK women with breast cancer: protocol for a pilot fractional factorial trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e069971. [PMID: 36737093 PMCID: PMC9900066 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Women with breast cancer who do not adhere to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) have increased risks of mortality and recurrence. There are multiple barriers to AET adherence, including medication side-effects, beliefs about medication, memory and psychological distress. We developed four intervention components, each targeting a different barrier. This pilot trial is part of the preparation phase of the Multiphase Optimisation Strategy, and aims to establish key trial parameters, establish intervention component adherence, establish availability and feasibility of outcome and process data, estimate variability in planned outcome measures and estimate cost of developing and delivering each intervention component. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The four intervention components are as follows: short message service text reminders (target: memory); a written information leaflet (target: medication beliefs); a guided self-help Acceptance and Commitment Therapy programme (target: psychological flexibility to reduce distress) and a self-management website (target: side-effect management). To evaluate the feasibility of recruitment, acceptability of the intervention components and the availability of outcome data, we will conduct a multisite, exploratory pilot trial using a 24-1 fractional factorial design, with a nested process evaluation. We will randomise 80 women with early-stage breast cancer who have been prescribed AET to one of eight experimental conditions. This will determine the combination of intervention components they receive, ranging from zero to four, with all conditions receiving usual care. Key outcomes of interest include medication adherence and quality of life. Progression to the optimisation phase will be based on predefined criteria for consent rates, patient adherence to intervention components and availability of medication adherence data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study was reviewed by the Wales Research Authority Research Ethics Committee 3 (21/WA/0322). Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients before randomisation. The results of this trial will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRTCN10487576.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel G Smith
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sophie M C Green
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Rachel Ellison
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Robbie Foy
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Ellen Mason
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - David P French
- School of Psychological Sciences, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Louise H Hall
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Hollie Wilkes
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Emma McNaught
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Erin Raine
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Rebecca Walwyn
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Daniel Howdon
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jane Clark
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Nikki Rousseau
- Surgical, Diagnostic and Devices Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jacqueline Buxton
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sally J L Moore
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Catherine Parbutt
- Medicines Management and Pharmacy Services, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Galina Velikova
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Amanda Farrin
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Michelle Collinson
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kuhn EP, Pirruccello J, Boothe JT, Li Z, Tosteson TD, Stahl JE, Schwartz GN, Chamberlin MD. Preventing metastatic recurrence in low-risk ER/PR + breast cancer patients-a retrospective clinical study exploring the evolving challenge of persistence with adjuvant endocrine therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 198:31-41. [PMID: 36592233 PMCID: PMC9883310 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06849-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the genomic era, more women with low-risk breast cancer will forego chemotherapy and rely on adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) to prevent metastatic recurrence. However, some of these patients will unfortunately relapse. We sought to understand this outcome. Preliminary work suggested that early discontinuation of AET, also known as non-persistence, may play an important role. A retrospective analysis exploring factors related to our breast cancer patients' non-persistence with AET was performed. METHODS Women who underwent Oncotype-DX® testing between 2011 and 2014 with minimum 5 years follow-up were included. 'Low risk' was defined as Oncotype score < 26. Outcomes of recurrence and persistence were determined by chart review. Patient, tumor and treatment factors were collected, and persistent versus non-persistent groups compared using multivariable ANOVA and Fisher Chi square exact test. RESULTS We identified six cases of distant recurrence among low-risk patients with a median follow-up of 7.7 years. Among them, five of six patients (83%) were non-persistent with AET. The non-persistence rate in our cohort regardless of recurrence was 57/228 (25%). Non-persistent patients reported more severe side effects compared with persistent patients (p = 0.002) and were more likely to be offered a switch in endocrine therapy, rather than symptom-relief (p = 0.006). In contrast, persistent patients were 10.3 times more likely to have been offered symptom-alleviating medications compared with non-persistent patients (p < 0.001). A subset analysis revealed that patients who persisted with therapy had a higher Oncotype-DX® score than patients who discontinued early (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION Metastatic recurrence in low-risk breast cancer patients may be primarily due to non-persistence with endocrine therapy. Further work is needed to optimize care for patients who struggle with side effects. To our knowledge, these are the first published data suggesting that Oncotype-DX® score may influence persistence with AET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine P Kuhn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
| | - Jonathan Pirruccello
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - James T Boothe
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Zhongze Li
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Tor D Tosteson
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - James E Stahl
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Gary N Schwartz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Mary D Chamberlin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Patients' Experience of Medication Brand Changes during Hormone Therapy for Breast Cancer-An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10122558. [PMID: 36554081 PMCID: PMC9778172 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10122558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Medication adherence to hormone therapy (HT) in breast cancer survivors is often suboptimal and is affected by a range of factors. Patients are usually prescribed different generic formulations of HT drugs and their impact on side effects and on adherence and persistence is poorly understood. This study aimed to explore women's lived experience of HT medication brand changes (generic substitution) and its impact on side effects, quality of life and medication-taking behaviors, as well as on adherence and persistence. Nine female breast cancer survivors who had previous experience of HT medication brand changes participated in the study. Individual, online, semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. The findings identified three superordinate themes and nine subordinate themes that influenced the lived experience of medication brand changes for these patients: (i) experiencing brand changes, (ii) responsiveness of health care providers and (iii) future expectations. Women reported negative physical and emotional experiences of brand changes, which is often compounded by healthcare professionals' lack of information and reassurances, disbelief in the worsening of side effects and inconsistent advice regarding generics. These have implications for women's self-efficacy for medication-taking behaviors, ability to manage side effects and HT adherence and persistence.
Collapse
|
10
|
Andreu Y, Soto-Rubio A, Ramos-Campos M, Escriche-Saura A, Martínez M, Gavilá J. Impact of hormone therapy side effects on health-related quality of life, distress, and well-being of breast cancer survivors. Sci Rep 2022; 12:18673. [PMID: 36333362 PMCID: PMC9636256 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22971-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
To explore the modulatory role of Adjuvant Hormone Therapy (AHT) on health-related quality of life (QoL), subjective well-being and distress prevalence in Breast Cancer (BC) survivors, considering the survival phase. Cross-sectional study with control group. 616 BC survivors participated. Examination of interaction effect between AHT and time since end of primary treatment showed that many of the positive changes observed through the survival phases were experienced exclusively by survivors without AHT. When AHT was not prescribed, longer time elapsed was associated with a decrease in distress prevalence and an improvement in subjective well-being and QoL. It seems there is a turning point around the fifth year after finalization of primary treatment, from which the survivors without AHT significantly improve in several areas and those with AHT do so to a lesser extent. It is expected that the improvement in QoL throughout the different survival phases will have a significant impact on the adherence and maintenance of AHT and, consequently, the likelihood of survival. Thus, AHT side-effects should be routinely assessed by health care providers to gain accurate knowledge that allows improving the QoL of BC survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y. Andreu
- grid.5338.d0000 0001 2173 938XPersonality, Assessment and Psychological Treatments Department, Faculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - A. Soto-Rubio
- grid.5338.d0000 0001 2173 938XPersonality, Assessment and Psychological Treatments Department, Faculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - M. Ramos-Campos
- grid.453328.bAsociación Española Contra el Cáncer (AECC), Valencia, Spain
| | - A. Escriche-Saura
- grid.453328.bAsociación Española Contra el Cáncer (AECC), Valencia, Spain
| | - M. Martínez
- grid.411308.fDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia-Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain
| | - J. Gavilá
- grid.418082.70000 0004 1771 144XMedical Oncology Department, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gil-Guillen VF, Balsa A, Bernárdez B, Valdés y Llorca C, Márquez-Contreras E, de la Haba-Rodríguez J, Castellano JM, Gómez-Martínez J. Medication Non-Adherence in Rheumatology, Oncology and Cardiology: A Review of the Literature of Risk Factors and Potential Interventions. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:12036. [PMID: 36231341 PMCID: PMC9564665 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Medication adherence is directly associated with health outcomes. Adherence has been reviewed extensively; however, most studies provide a narrow scope of the problem, covering a specific disease or treatment. This project's objective was to identify risk factors for non-adherence in the fields of rheumatology, oncology, and cardiology as well as potential interventions to improve adherence and their association with the risk factors. The project was developed in three phases and carried out by a Steering Committee made up of experts from the fields of rheumatology, oncology, cardiology, general medicine, and hospital and community pharmacy. In phase 1, a bibliographic review was performed, and the articles/reviews were classified according to the authors' level of confidence in the results and their clinical relevance. In phase 2, 20 risk factors for non-adherence were identified from these articles/reviews and agreed upon in Steering Committee meetings. In phase 3, potential interventions for improving adherence were also identified and agreed upon. The results obtained show that adherence is a dynamic concept that can change throughout the course of the disease, the treatments, and other factors. Educational interventions are the most studied ones and have the highest level of confidence in the authors' opinion. Information and education are essential to improve adherence in all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicente F. Gil-Guillen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernandez University, 03550 San Juan, Spain
- Research Unit, Hospital General Universitario de Elda, 30600 Elda, Spain
| | - Alejandro Balsa
- Rheumatology Department, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain
- Institute for Health Research Hospital La Paz (IdiPaz), 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Bernárdez
- Department of Oncologic Pharmacy, Santiago de Compostela University Hospital, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Medicine Department, Santiago de Compostela University, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Pharmacology Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Adherence Group of the Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria (ADHEFAR-SEFH), 28001 Madrid, Spain
| | - Carmen Valdés y Llorca
- Fuencarral Health Center, 28034 Madrid, Spain
- Observatorio de Adherencia al Tratamiento (OAT), 28231 Madrid, Spain
- Treatment Adherence Chair, San Juan de Alicante University, 03550 Alicante, Spain
| | | | | | - Jose M. Castellano
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Centro Integral de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares, Monteprincipe University Hospital, 28660 Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Green SMC, French DP, Graham CD, Hall LH, Rousseau N, Foy R, Clark J, Parbutt C, Raine E, Gardner B, Velikova G, Moore SJL, Buxton J, Smith SG. Supporting adjuvant endocrine therapy adherence in women with breast cancer: the development of a complex behavioural intervention using Intervention Mapping guided by the Multiphase Optimisation Strategy. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1081. [PMID: 36002831 PMCID: PMC9404670 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08243-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) reduces the risk of breast cancer recurrence and mortality. However, up to three-quarters of women with breast cancer do not take AET as prescribed. Existing interventions to support adherence to AET have largely been unsuccessful, and have not focused on the most salient barriers to adherence. This paper describes the process of developing four theory-based intervention components to support adherence to AET. Our aim is to provide an exemplar of intervention development using Intervention Mapping (IM) with guidance from the Multiphase Optimisation Strategy (MOST). METHODS Iterative development followed the six-stage IM framework with stakeholder involvement. Stage 1 involved a literature review of barriers to adherence and existing interventions, which informed the intervention objectives outlined in Stage 2. Stage 3 identified relevant theoretical considerations and practical strategies for supporting adherence. Stage 4 used information from Stages 1-3 to develop the intervention components. Stages 1-4 informed a conceptual model for the intervention package. Stages 5 and 6 detailed implementation considerations and evaluation plans for the intervention package, respectively. RESULTS The final intervention package comprised four individual intervention components: Short Message Service to encourage habitual behaviours surrounding medication taking; an information leaflet to target unhelpful beliefs about AET; remotely delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-based guided self-help to reduce psychological distress; and a website to support self-management of AET side-effects. Considerations for implementation within the NHS, including cost, timing and mode of delivery were outlined, with explanation as to how using MOST can aid this. We detail our plans for the final stage of IM which involve feasibility testing. This involved planning an external exploratory pilot trial using a 24-1 fractional factorial design, and a process evaluation to assess acceptability and fidelity of intervention components. CONCLUSIONS We have described a systematic and logical approach for developing a theoretically informed intervention package to support medication adherence in women with breast cancer using AET. Further research to optimise the intervention package, guided by MOST, has the potential to lead to more effective, efficient and scalable interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie M. C. Green
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - David P. French
- grid.5379.80000000121662407Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Christopher D. Graham
- grid.4777.30000 0004 0374 7521Department of Psychology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Louise H. Hall
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Nikki Rousseau
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Robbie Foy
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Jane Clark
- grid.443984.60000 0000 8813 7132St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Catherine Parbutt
- grid.443984.60000 0000 8813 7132St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Erin Raine
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Benjamin Gardner
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Galina Velikova
- grid.443984.60000 0000 8813 7132Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK ,grid.443984.60000 0000 8813 7132Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Sally J. L. Moore
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Jacqueline Buxton
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | | | - Samuel G. Smith
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fleming L, Agnew S, Peddie N, Crawford M, Dixon D, MacPherson I. The impact of medication side effects on adherence and persistence to hormone therapy in breast cancer survivors: A quantitative systematic review. Breast 2022; 64:63-84. [PMID: 35609380 PMCID: PMC9130570 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hormone Therapy (HT) is recommended for most women with HR-positive primary breast cancer. When taken as intended, HT reduces breast cancer recurrence by 40% and mortality by one-third. The recommended duration of treatment ranges from 5 to 10 years depending on risk of recurrence and the specific HT regimen. However, recent data indicates that rates of HT non-adherence are high and research suggests this may be due to the impact of HT side effects. The contribution of side effects to non-adherence and non-persistence behaviours has rarely been systematically explored, thereby hindering the implementation of targeted intervention strategies. Our aim is to identify, evaluate and summarise the relationship between HT side effects and patterns of adherence and persistence. METHODS Electronic searches were conducted from inception and were completed by September 2021, utilising Cochrane CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, Web of Science and PsycINFO databases. Searches included a combination of terms related to breast cancer, adherence, hormone therapy and side effects. RESULTS Sixty-two eligible papers were identified and study quality varied by study type. Most observational and cross-sectional studies were rated good quality, whereas most controlled intervention studies were rated fair quality. Three studies were rated poor quality. The most frequently measured side effects were pain, low mood, hot flashes, insomnia, anxiety, fatigue, weight gain, concentration/memory problems. CONCLUSIONS This review identified a lack of consistency in the measurement of adherence and the definition of persistence across studies. The instruments used to measure side effects also varied significantly. This variation and lack of consistency makes it difficult to evaluate and summarise the role of HT side effects in HT adherence and persistence behaviour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sommer Agnew
- University of Strathclyde, George Street, Glasgow, UK
| | - Nicola Peddie
- University of Strathclyde, George Street, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Diane Dixon
- University of Aberdeen, Kings College, Aberdeen, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hu X, Walker MS, Stepanski E, Kaplan CM, Martin MY, Vidal GA, Schwartzberg LS, Graetz I. Racial Differences in Patient-Reported Symptoms and Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Among Women With Early-Stage, Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2225485. [PMID: 35947386 PMCID: PMC9366541 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.25485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) reduces breast cancer recurrence, but symptom burden is a key barrier to adherence. Black women have lower AET adherence and worse health outcomes than White women. OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between symptom burden and AET adherence differences by race. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective cohort study using electronic health records with patient-reported data from a large cancer center in the US. Patients included Black and White women initiating AET therapy for early-stage breast cancer from August 2007 to December 2015 who were followed for 1 year from AET initiation. Sixty symptoms classified into 7 physical and 2 psychological symptom clusters were evaluated. For each cluster, the number of symptoms with moderate severity at baseline, and symptoms with 3-point or greater increases during AET were counted. Adherence was measured as the proportion of days covered by AET during the first-year follow-up. Multivariable regressions for patients' adherence adjusting for race, symptom measures, sociodemographic characteristics, and clinical characteristics were conducted. Kitagawa-Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition was used to quantify racial differences in adherence explained by symptoms and patient characteristics. Analyses were conducted from July 2021 to January 2022. EXPOSURES Physical and psychological symptoms at baseline and changes during AET. RESULTS Among 559 patients (168 [30.1%] Black and 391 [69.9%] White; mean [SD] age 65.5 [12.1] years), Black women received diagnoses younger (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 58.7 [13.7] vs 68.5 [10.0] years old) than White women, with more advanced stages (30 Black participants [17.9%] vs 31 White participants [7.9%] had stage III disease at diagnosis), and lived in areas with fewer adults attaining high school education (mean [SD], 78.8% [7.8%] vs 84.0% [9.3%]). AET adherence in the first year was 78.8% for Black and 82.3% for White women. Black women reported higher severity in most symptom clusters than White women. Neuropsychological, vasomotor, musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory, distress, and despair symptoms at baseline and increases during the follow-up were associated with 1.2 to 2.6 percentage points decreases in adherence, which corresponds to 4 to 9 missed days receiving AET in the first year. After adjusting for psychological symptoms, being Black was associated with 6.5 percentage points higher adherence than being White. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, severe symptoms were associated with lower AET adherence. Black women had lower adherence rates that were explained by their higher symptom burden and baseline characteristics. These findings suggest that better symptom management with a focus on psychological symptoms could improve AET adherence and reduce racial disparities in cancer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Hu
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | - Cameron M. Kaplan
- Gehr Family Center for Health Systems Science and Innovation, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Michelle Y. Martin
- Center for Innovation in Health Equity Research, Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis
| | - Gregory A. Vidal
- West Cancer Center and Research Institute, Germantown, Tennessee
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis
| | | | - Ilana Graetz
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ibrar M, Peddie N, Agnew S, Diserholt A, Fleming L. Breast Cancer Survivors' Lived Experience of Adjuvant Hormone Therapy: A Thematic Analysis of Medication Side Effects and Their Impact on Adherence. Front Psychol 2022; 13:861198. [PMID: 35602711 PMCID: PMC9120958 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.861198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Side effects from Hormone Therapy (HT) impact medication adherence in breast cancer survivors. Understanding the most distressing HT side effects and their impacts may inform the development and implementation of interventions to alleviate these side effects and maximise HT adherence. This study aimed to explore the lived experience of adjuvant HT and understand the impact of HT side effects on adherence in a sample of breast cancer survivors. Methods Twenty-five female breast cancer survivors who were currently taking adjuvant HT participated in the study. One-to-one, online, semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore (i) specific side effects from HT and (ii) the impact of these side effects on HT adherence. Data were analysed using Thematic Analysis. Results The most commonly reported side effects were sleep disturbance, hot flashes, anxiety, and joint pain. Data exploring the impacts of these side effects on HT adherence were thematically synthesised into four analytical themes: "A bitter pill to swallow," "Seeking relief," "Taking control," and "The only way out is through." These themes encompass 14 sub-themes that encapsulate participants' daily struggle with HT side effects and the coping strategies developed to manage these. Conclusion Adverse side effects from HT, such as sleep disturbance, hot flashes, pain and anxiety, impair quality of life and increase the likelihood of participants' becoming non-adherent to HT medication. In order to maximise HT adherence and reduce breast cancer mortality, HT side effects should be closely monitored to identify individuals who would benefit from targetted intervention strategies aimed at alleviating these side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Ibrar
- School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Peddie
- School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Sommer Agnew
- School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Amanda Diserholt
- School of Psychology and Life Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, United Kingdom
| | - Leanne Fleming
- School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Smith KL, Verma N, Blackford AL, Lehman J, Westbrook K, Lim D, Fetting J, Wolff AC, Jelovac D, Miller RS, Connolly R, Armstrong DK, Nunes R, Visvanathan K, Riley C, Papathakis K, Zafman N, Sheng JY, Snyder C, Stearns V. Association of treatment-emergent symptoms identified by patient-reported outcomes with adjuvant endocrine therapy discontinuation. NPJ Breast Cancer 2022; 8:53. [PMID: 35449210 PMCID: PMC9023490 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-022-00414-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Many patients discontinue endocrine therapy for breast cancer due to intolerance. Identification of patients at risk for discontinuation is challenging. The minimal important difference (MID) is the smallest change in a score on a patient-reported outcome (PRO) that is clinically significant. We evaluated the association between treatment-emergent symptoms detected by worsening PRO scores in units equal to the MID with discontinuation. We enrolled females with stage 0-III breast cancer initiating endocrine therapy in a prospective cohort. Participants completed PROs at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. Measures included PROMIS pain interference, fatigue, depression, anxiety, physical function, and sleep disturbance; Endocrine Subscale of the FACT-ES; and MOS-Sexual Problems (MOS-SP). We evaluated associations between continuous PRO scores in units corresponding to MIDs (PROMIS: 4-points; FACT-ES: 5-points; MOS-SP: 8-points) with time to endocrine therapy discontinuation using Cox proportional hazards models. Among 321 participants, 140 (43.6%) initiated tamoxifen and 181 (56.4%) initiated aromatase inhibitor (AI). The cumulative probability of discontinuation was 23% (95% CI 18-27%) at 48 months. For every 5- and 4-point worsening in endocrine symptoms and sleep disturbance respectively, participants were 13 and 14% more likely to discontinue endocrine therapy respectively (endocrine symptoms HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.25, p = 0.02; sleep disturbance HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.29, p = 0.03). AI treatment was associated with greater likelihood of discontinuation than tamoxifen. Treatment-emergent endocrine symptoms and sleep disturbance are associated with endocrine therapy discontinuation. Monitoring for worsening scores meeting or exceeding the MID on PROs may identify patients at risk for discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Lisa Smith
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Neha Verma
- Johns Hopkins Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amanda L Blackford
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Lehman
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kelly Westbrook
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - David Lim
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John Fetting
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Antonio C Wolff
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniela Jelovac
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Robert S Miller
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- CancerLinQ, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA
| | - Roisin Connolly
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Cancer Research @UCC, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Deborah K Armstrong
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Raquel Nunes
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kala Visvanathan
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Carol Riley
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Katie Papathakis
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nelli Zafman
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Y Sheng
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Claire Snyder
- Johns Hopkins Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vered Stearns
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Green SMC, French DP, Hall LH, Bartlett YK, Rousseau N, Raine E, Parbutt C, Gardner B, Smith SG. Co-development of a text messaging intervention to support adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy in women with breast cancer: A mixed-methods approach (Preprint). J Med Internet Res 2022; 25:e38073. [DOI: 10.2196/38073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
|
18
|
Galindo Vázquez O, Mendoza-Contreras LA, Penedo FJ, Bobadilla Alcaraz R, Bargalló Rocha E. Escala de Adherencia Terapéutica para tratamiento de Cáncer de Mama (EAT-CaMa): Una evaluación multidimensional. PSICOONCOLOGIA 2022. [DOI: 10.5209/psic.80802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introducción: La adherencia terapéutica es un aspecto clave en el éxito del tratamiento en oncología, sin embargo, su medición es un reto dentro del sistema de salud. Asimismo, no se tienen escalas especificas validas o construidas para evaluar la adherencia en pacientes con cáncer de mama. Objetivo: Determinar las propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Adherencia Terapéutica al Cáncer de Mama (EAT-CaMa). Método: Se empleó un diseño no experimental, instrumental con un muestreo no probabilístico. Se incluyeron 189 participantes con diagnóstico de CaMa entre 21 y 84 años. Análisis estadísticos: Se realizó un análisis factorial exploratorio y consistencia interna. Resultados: La EATCaMa de 27 reactivos, obtuvo una consistencia interna global α= 0,81 y una varianza explicada del 64%. Se identificaron factores de autoeficacia y comunicación médico paciente, así como varios indicadores. Conclusión: El EAT-CaMa es un instrumento breve, válido y confiable para la evaluación multidimensional de la adherencia al tratamiento en población con CaMa. La estructura factorial identificada corrobora componentes reportados en la literatura y clínicamente relevantes. Se recomienda su uso en la atención clínica (inicio y seguimiento del tratamiento) y en investigación.
Collapse
|
19
|
Rationale and usability findings of an e-health intervention to improve oral anticancer adherence among breast cancer survivors: The My Journey mindfulness study. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2022; 26:100898. [PMID: 35252622 PMCID: PMC8889091 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Approximately 80% of breast cancer survivors are prescribed oral endocrine therapy (ET) medication for 5–10 years following primary treatment, making adherence to ET a critical aspect of cancer survivorship care. Despite the benefits of ET, non-adherence is problematic, and up to half of breast cancer survivors ave been documented to discontinue ET early. Our team developed My Journey, an online, mindfulness-based program designed to improve adherence to ET. This manuscript describes the usability testing of My Journey and the protocol development for the My Journey randomized feasibility trial. Methods Usability participants were women (N = 15) with a diagnosis of hormone receptor-positive non-metastatic breast cancer who had initiated ET. Participant impressions and feedback were collected qualitatively and quantitatively using items on usefulness, satisfaction, and ease of use. Participants in the 8-week feasibility trial (N = 80) will be randomized to receive the web-based My Journey intervention or a health education comparison condition. Results Quantitative feedback on the usability trial was favorable, with a mean overall usability score of 106.3 (SD = 7.7; Range: 83–115) indicating above average usability. Qualitative data showed that participants found several strengths in the initial design of the My Journey online tool and that participants liked the layout of My Journey. Conclusions Findings indicate that the My Journey online tool is useable. The program's feasibility is being evaluated in a randomized trial.
Collapse
|
20
|
Sheppard VB, Sutton AL, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, He J, Dahman B, Edmonds MC, Hackney MH, Tadesse MG. Race and Patient-reported Symptoms in Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy: A Report from the Women's Hormonal Initiation and Persistence Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 30:699-709. [PMID: 33514603 PMCID: PMC8330157 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) improves outcomes in women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. Suboptimal AET adherence is common, but data are lacking about symptoms and adherence in racial/ethnic minorities. We evaluated adherence by race and the relationship between symptoms and adherence. METHODS The Women's Hormonal Initiation and Persistence study included women diagnosed with nonrecurrent HR+ breast cancer who initiated AET. AET adherence was captured using validated items. Data regarding patient (e.g., race), medication-related (e.g., symptoms), cancer care delivery (e.g., communication), and clinicopathologic factors (e.g., chemotherapy) were collected via surveys and medical charts. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) associated with adherence. RESULTS Of the 570 participants, 92% were privately insured and nearly one of three were Black. Thirty-six percent reported nonadherent behaviors. In multivariable analysis, women less likely to report adherent behaviors were Black (vs. White; OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.27-0.67; P < 0.001) and with greater symptom burden (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00; P < 0.05). Participants more likely to be adherent were overweight (vs. normal weight) (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.04-2.43; P < 0.05), sat ≤ 6 hours a day (vs. ≥6 hours; OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.25-2.70; P < 0.01), and were taking aromatase inhibitors (vs. tamoxifen; OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.28-2.87; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Racial differences in AET adherence were observed. Longitudinal assessments of symptom burden are needed to better understand this dynamic process and factors that may explain differences in survivor subgroups. IMPACT Future interventions should prioritize Black survivors and women with greater symptom burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa B Sheppard
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.
- Office of Health Equity and Disparities Research, VCU Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Arnethea L Sutton
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia
| | | | - Jun He
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Bassam Dahman
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Megan C Edmonds
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Mary Helen Hackney
- Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Mahlet G Tadesse
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Edmonds MC, Sutton AL, Cummings Y, Sheppard VB. Opportunities to Improve Women's Health: Engaging Racial/Ethnic Diverse Women to Provide Biospecimens for Research. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2021; 30:1321-1327. [PMID: 33428522 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: Inclusion of women in biomedical cancer research have the potential to close gaps in cancer health disparities and improve adjuvant therapies for women; yet samples needed to advance this area of science are lacking. We developed low-cost educational recruitment strategies to increase our collection of biospecimens from women. Materials and Methods: Women diagnosed with hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer that initiated hormonal therapy were recruited from three integrated health systems. The analytical sample (n = 144) consisted of women who consented but did not return a saliva sample within 1 year of the initial assessment (baseline). Brief informational recruitment materials were developed via published literature and preliminary data. Women received recruitment materials, which included a personalized information letter, a colorful low-literacy instruction sheet, a postage-paid envelope, and collection kits. We evaluated intervention materials and performed descriptive and bivariate statistics to describe factors associated with biospecimen donation. Results: Of the total sample, 61% were white and 34% were black. Overall, 29 surveys (20%) and 25 (17%) saliva kits were returned. Women found the materials helpful and easy to read and understand. Women with higher levels of functional well-being and lower ratings of religiosity were more likely to return biospecimens (p < 0.005) after receiving enhanced materials. Conclusion: This article provides recruitment strategies to enhance biospecimen samples among women. Receipt of brief informational print materials inclusive of personalized messages enhanced our outreach strategies and increased our overall biospecimen provision rate by 17%. The inclusion of messages with a focus on spirituality and other cultural messages may further increase biospecimen provision in racial/ethnic diverse groups of women; however, further study is needed to support this claim. Clinical Trail Registration Number: NCT02992730.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan C Edmonds
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.,VCU Massey Cancer Center Office of Health Equity and Disparities Research, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Arnethea L Sutton
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.,VCU Massey Cancer Center Office of Health Equity and Disparities Research, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Yvonne Cummings
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.,VCU Massey Cancer Center Office of Health Equity and Disparities Research, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Vanessa B Sheppard
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.,VCU Massey Cancer Center Office of Health Equity and Disparities Research, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Stephenson JJ, Gable JC, Zincavage R, Price GL, Churchill C, Zhu E, Stenger K, Singhal M, Nepal B, Grabner M, Fisch MJ, Debono D, Geschwender AR, Cuyun Carter G. Treatment Experiences with CDK4&6 Inhibitors Among Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2021; 15:2417-2429. [PMID: 34764640 PMCID: PMC8573215 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s319239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe patients' perspectives on the use of and potential challenges and barriers with adherence/persistence to cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4&6i's) to treat metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS This qualitative study consisted of 60-minute semi-structured telephone interviews with patients with MBC in the US who were either current or recent CDK4&6i users, identified from administrative claims of survey-eligible commercial and Medicare Advantage patients in the HealthCore Integrated Research Database between November 1, 2018 and November 1, 2019. Patients were recruited by email and/or mailed letter. The 60-minute telephone interviews were conducted by a trained facilitator using a study-developed interview discussion guide that included topics impacting treatment choice and adherence/persistence. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. RESULTS All 462 eligible patients were sent a recruitment email and/or letter to which 36 patients responded, consented to participate, and met study inclusion criteria; 25 patients scheduled interviews, and 24 completed them. Study participants were predominately white, non-Hispanic (96%) with a mean age of 59.5 years. Participants reported a largely positive experience and mentioned very few adherence/persistence issues. They further reported appreciating the ease and convenience of oral oncolytics, coped with side effects, had strong medical and social support, and experienced few cost issues. CONCLUSION The few adherence/persistence issues reported by participants contrasts with other findings of suboptimal oral oncolytic use. Interview themes indicated several factors that likely contributed to the lack of adherence/persistence issues: trusted relationship with oncologist, belief in importance of medication, positive medication views, strong medical and social support, and minimal personal drug cost. Future research should focus on whether and how much these factors impact adherence/persistence in more diverse populations. If adherence/persistence issues are identified in these populations, then it would be appropriate to study the development of interventions that target factors associated with better adherence/persistence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith J Stephenson
- HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA
- Correspondence: Judith J Stephenson Tel +1 302-547-5770 Email
| | | | | | | | | | - Emily Zhu
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | - Bal Nepal
- HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Toivonen KI, Carlson LE, Rash JA, Campbell TS. A Survey of Potentially Modifiable Patient-Level Factors Associated with Self-Report and Objectively Measured Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapies After Breast Cancer. Patient Prefer Adherence 2021; 15:2039-2050. [PMID: 34552322 PMCID: PMC8450192 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s319087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite the efficacy of adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) in reducing breast cancer recurrence and mortality, suboptimal AET adherence is common and hence an important clinical issue among breast cancer survivors. Delineating potentially modifiable patient-level factors associated with AET adherence may support the development of successful adherence-enhancing interventions. PATIENTS AND METHODS The present study included 133 breast cancer survivors prescribed AET recruited from a cancer pharmacy. Women completed a baseline questionnaire examining psychosocial factors and self-reported adherence and consented to their prescription records being monitored for the proceeding 12 months to ascertain proportion of days covered (PDC), an objective measure of adherence. Regression analyses were used to identify the factors most strongly associated with both self-reported and objective adherence. Exploratory moderation analyses examined whether factors were differentially associated with adherence based on AET type (aromatase inhibitors or tamoxifen). RESULTS Adherence was high in this sample (PDC over 12 months was 95%). Side effect severity was most strongly associated with self-reported adherence, followed by self-efficacy, and medication/healthcare system-related barriers. Medication/healthcare system-related barriers was the only factor that uniquely predicted objective adherence. Within medication/healthcare system-related barriers, fear of side effects was most strongly associated with both measures of adherence. There were no significant interactions between AET type and potentially modifiable factors in predicting self-reported or objective adherence. CONCLUSION Side effects, reactions to side effects, and self-efficacy may represent modifiable targets through which AET adherence can be improved. Associations between potentially modifiable factors and adherence did not vary by AET type, despite distinct side-effect profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsti I Toivonen
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Linda E Carlson
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Joshua A Rash
- Department of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, Canada
| | - Tavis S Campbell
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Correspondence: Tavis S Campbell Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, T2N 1N4, AB, CanadaTel +1 403-210-8606 Email
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kaptein AA, Schoones JW, van der Meer PB, Matsuda A, Murray M, Heimans L, Kroep JR. Psychosocial determinants of adherence with oral anticancer treatment: 'we don't need no education'. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:87-95. [PMID: 33151764 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1843190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Given the potentially fatal consequences of inadequate adherence with oral anticancer treatment in persons with cancer, understanding the determinants of adherence is vital. This paper aims at identifying psychosocial determinants of adherence to oral anticancer treatment. METHODS We reviewed the literature on psychosocial determinants of adherence with oral anticancer treatment, based on published literature in English, from 2015 to present. Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane library, Emcare, and PsychINFO, with 'cancer', 'medication adherence', 'psychology', and 'oral anticancer treatment' as search terms. The obtained 608 papers were screened by two independent reviewers. RESULTS In the 25 studies identified, illness perceptions, medication beliefs, health beliefs, and depression were found to be the major psychosocial determinants of adherence to oral anticancer treatment; sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were found to be of no major importance. The quality of the identified studies as assessed by two independent reviewers was found to be acceptable overall. The majority of papers were from North America and focused on patients with breast cancer; sample size varied from 13 to 1371; adherence was assessed with questionnaires derived from various theoretical models, pill counts and electronic pharmacy records; illness perceptions reflecting adaptive coping, and medication beliefs reflecting high necessity and low concerns were found to be associated with adherence. CONCLUSION Psychosocial concepts are major determinants of adherence with oral anticancer treatment. 'Beliefs about medicines' and 'illness perceptions' in particular determine adherence with this treatment. Studies aiming at impacting adherence would benefit from interventions with a solid basis in behavioral theory in order to help health care providers explore and address illness perceptions and medication beliefs. Pre-consultation screening of adherence behavior may be a helpful supportive approach to improve adherence. Blaming the victim ('patients should be educated about the importance of adherence') is better replaced by encouraging health professionals to identify and address maladaptive psychosocial determinants of adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian A. Kaptein
- Department of Medical Psychology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jan W. Schoones
- Walaeus Library, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Pim B. van der Meer
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ayako Matsuda
- Department of Hygiene and Public Health, School of Medicine, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Michael Murray
- School of Psychology, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK
| | - Lotte Heimans
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Judith R. Kroep
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Potentially Modifiable Factors Associated with Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy among Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 13:cancers13010107. [PMID: 33561076 PMCID: PMC7794693 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13010107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2020] [Revised: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) reduces risk of breast cancer recurrence. However, suboptimal adherence and persistence to AET remain important clinical issues. Understanding factors associated with adherence may help inform efforts to improve use of AET as prescribed. The present systematic review examined potentially modifiable factors associated with adherence to AET in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42019124200). All studies were included, whether factors were significantly associated with adherence or results were null. This review also accounted for the frequency with which a potentially modifiable factor was examined and whether univariate or multivariate models were used. This review also examined whether methodological or sample characteristics were associated with the likelihood of a factor being associated with AET adherence. A total of 68 articles were included. Potentially modifiable factors were grouped into six categories: side effects, attitudes toward AET, psychological factors, healthcare provider-related factors, sociocultural factors, and general/quality of life factors. Side effects were less likely to be associated with adherence in studies with retrospective or cross-sectional than prospective designs. Self-efficacy (psychological factor) and positive decisional balance (attitude toward AET) were the only potentially modifiable factors examined ≥10 times and associated with adherence or persistence ≥75% of the time in both univariate and multivariate models. Self-efficacy and decisional balance (i.e., weight of pros vs. cons) were the potentially modifiable factors most consistently associated with adherence, and hence may be worth focusing on as targets for interventions to improve AET adherence among breast cancer survivors.
Collapse
|
26
|
Montagna E, Pagan E, Bagnardi V, Colleoni M, Cancello G, Munzone E, Dellapasqua S, Bianco N, Campennì G, Iorfida M, Mazza M, De Maio A, Veronesi P, Sangalli C, Scateni B, Pettini G, Pravettoni G, Mazzocco K, Galimberti V. Evaluation of endocrine therapy and patients preferences in early breast cancer: results of Elena study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 184:783-795. [PMID: 32929568 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05900-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The development of the adjuvant therapy requires that clinicians and patients should discuss the magnitude of benefit of treatment for individual patient, estimating the pros and cons and the personal preferences. The aim of the present study was to determine the preferences of women treated with adjuvant hormonal therapy (HT) for breast cancer. METHODS The analyses were conducted into three different groups of early breast cancer patients to evaluate the survival benefit needed to make treatment worthwhile before starting HT (A), after a few months from the beginning (B) and after several years of HT (C). The questionnaires, showing hypothetical scenarios based on potential survival times and rates without HT, were used to determine the lowest gains women judged necessary to make the treatment worthwhile. RESULTS A total of 452 patients were included in the study: 149 in group A, 150 in group B and 153 in group C. In group C, 65% of patients were receiving HT with aromatase inhibitors (with or without a LHRH analogue). In the groups A, B, C 8%, 20% and 26%, respectively, received adjuvant chemotherapy. Overall, 355 women (79%) had children. The responses were quite similar between the three groups. A median gain of 10 years was judged necessary to make adjuvant HT worthwhile based on the hypothetical scenario of untreated mean survival time of 5 and 15 years. Median gain of 20% more women surviving was judged necessary to make adjuvant HT worthwhile based on an untreated 5-year survival rate expectation of 60%. Cognitive dysfunction was considered the side effect least compatible with the continuation of treatment in all three groups. CONCLUSIONS This is a large study of patient preferences on HT. Compared with other studies with similar design, the patients included in the present study required larger benefits to make adjuvant therapy worthwhile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Montagna
- Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
| | - E Pagan
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - V Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - M Colleoni
- Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - G Cancello
- Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - E Munzone
- Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - S Dellapasqua
- Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - N Bianco
- Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - G Campennì
- Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - M Iorfida
- Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - M Mazza
- Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - A De Maio
- Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - P Veronesi
- Division of Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - C Sangalli
- Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - B Scateni
- Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - G Pettini
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - G Pravettoni
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - K Mazzocco
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - V Galimberti
- Division of Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Shelby RA, Dorfman CS, Arthur SS, Bosworth HB, Corsino L, Sutton L, Owen L, Erkanli A, Keefe F, Corbett C, Kimmick G. Improving health engagement and lifestyle management for breast cancer survivors with diabetes. Contemp Clin Trials 2020; 92:105998. [PMID: 32289471 PMCID: PMC7590108 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.105998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer survivors with type 2 diabetes are at high risk for cancer recurrence, serious health complications, more severe symptoms, psychological distress, and premature death relative to breast cancer survivors without diabetes. Maintaining glycemic control is critical for decreasing symptoms and preventing serious health problems. Many breast cancer survivors with type 2 diabetes have difficulty maintaining diabetes self-management behaviors and achieving glycemic control. Both cancer and diabetes-related symptoms (e.g., physical symptoms and psychological distress) are often barriers to engaging in diabetes self-management strategies. This study evaluates a novel diabetes coping skills training (DCST) intervention for improving breast cancer survivors' abilities to manage symptoms and adhere to recommended diabetes self-management behaviors. The telephone-based DCST protocol integrates three key theory-based strategies: coping skills training for managing symptoms, adherence skills training, and healthy lifestyle skills training. A randomized clinical trial will test the DCST intervention plus diabetes education by comparing it to diabetes education alone. Symptoms, distress, diabetes self-management behaviors, and self-efficacy will be assessed at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) will be assessed at baseline, 6, and 12 months. This study addresses a critical gap in the care of breast cancer survivors by evaluating a novel behavioral intervention to improve the management of symptoms, adherence, and glycemic control in breast cancer survivors with type 2 diabetes. Special considerations for this medically underserved population are also provided. The findings of this study could lead to significant improvements in clinical care and beneficial outcomes for breast cancer survivors. Trials registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02970344, registered 11/22/2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A Shelby
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - Caroline S Dorfman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Sarah S Arthur
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Hayden B Bosworth
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America; Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Leonor Corsino
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nutrition, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Linda Sutton
- Duke Cancer Network, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Lynda Owen
- Duke Cancer Network, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Alaattin Erkanli
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Francis Keefe
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Cheyenne Corbett
- Supportive Care and Survivorship Center, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Gretchen Kimmick
- Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Paladino AJ, Anderson JN, Krukowski RA, Waters T, Kocak M, Graff C, Blue R, Jones TN, Buzaglo J, Vidal G, Schwartzberg L, Graetz I. THRIVE study protocol: a randomized controlled trial evaluating a web-based app and tailored messages to improve adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy among women with breast cancer. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:977. [PMID: 31856812 PMCID: PMC6924011 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4588-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Long-term use of adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) among women with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer significantly reduces the risk of hospitalizations, cancer recurrence, and mortality. AET is associated with adverse symptoms that often result in poor adherence. A web-enabled app offers a novel way to communicate and manage symptoms for women on AET. In a region with significant racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes, our study tests the impact of a web-enabled app that collects and transmits patient-reported symptoms to healthcare teams to facilitate timely and responsive symptom management on medication adherence. Methods In this randomized controlled trial, we randomize 300 patients initiating AET to one of three arms: 1) an “App” group (n = 100) that receives weekly reminders to use the THRIVE study app; 2) an “App+Feedback” group (n = 100) that receives weekly reminders and tailored feedback based on their use of the app; or 3) a “Usual Care” group (n = 100) that receives usual care only. Participants are stratified by race: 50% White and 50% Black. The duration of the intervention is six months following enrollment, and outcomes are assessed at 12-months. The primary outcome is adherence, which is captured using an electronic monitoring pillbox. Secondary outcomes include symptom burden, quality of life, self-efficacy for managing symptoms, and healthcare costs. We also evaluate the impact of the intervention on racial disparities in adherence. Data are derived from three sources: electronic health record data to capture treatment changes, healthcare utilization, and health outcomes; self-report survey data related to adherence, symptom burden, and quality of life; and an electronic medication monitoring device that captures adherence. Discussion A successful web-enabled intervention could be disseminated across systems, conditions, and populations. By evaluating the impact of this intervention on a comprehensive set of measures, including AET adherence, patient outcomes, and costs, our study will provide valuable and actionable results for providers, policy makers, and insurers who strive to achieve the “Triple Aim” – reduce costs while improving health outcomes and the patient care experience. Trial registration NCT03592771. Prospectively registered on July 19, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Paladino
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, USA.,The West Cancer Center & Research Institute, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Janeane N Anderson
- College of Nursing, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 920 Madison Avenue, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Rebecca A Krukowski
- Department of Preventive Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Medicine, 66 N Pauline St, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Teresa Waters
- Department of Health Management and Policy, The University of Kentucky, College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Mehmet Kocak
- Department of Preventive Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Medicine, 66 N Pauline St, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Carolyn Graff
- College of Nursing, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 920 Madison Avenue, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Ryan Blue
- College of Nursing, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 920 Madison Avenue, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Tameka N Jones
- The West Cancer Center & Research Institute, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Joanne Buzaglo
- Department of Patient Reported Outcomes, Vector Oncology, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Gregory Vidal
- The West Cancer Center & Research Institute, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | - Ilana Graetz
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, USA. .,Department of Preventive Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Medicine, 66 N Pauline St, Memphis, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Dorfman CS, Arthur SS, Kimmick GG, Westbrook KW, Marcom PK, Corbett C, Edmond SN, Shelby RA. Partner status moderates the relationships between sexual problems and self-efficacy for managing sexual problems and psychosocial quality-of-life for postmenopausal breast cancer survivors taking adjuvant endocrine therapy. Menopause 2019; 26:823-832. [PMID: 30994574 PMCID: PMC7081279 DOI: 10.1097/gme.0000000000001337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Past studies indicate that >90% of breast cancer survivors taking adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) experience menopausal symptoms including sexual problems (eg, vaginal dryness, dyspareunia); however, research examining the impact of these problems on quality-of-life is limited. This cross-sectional study examined (1) the impact of sexual problems and self-efficacy for coping with sexual problems (sexual self-efficacy) on quality-of-life (ie, psychosocial quality-of-life and sexual satisfaction), and (2) partner status as a moderator of these relationships. METHODS Postmenopausal breast cancer survivors taking AET completed measures of sexual problems (Menopause-Specific Quality-of-Life [MENQOL] sexual subscale], sexual self-efficacy, psychosocial quality-of-life (MENQOL psychosocial subscale), and sexual satisfaction (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General item). RESULTS Bivariate analyses showed that women reporting greater sexual problems and lower sexual self-efficacy had poorer quality-of-life and less sexual satisfaction (all P-values < 0.05). Partner status moderated the relationship between sexual problems and psychosocial quality-of-life (P = 0.02); at high levels of sexual problems, unpartnered women experienced poorer psychosocial quality-of-life than partnered women. Partner status also moderated the relationship between self-efficacy and psychosocial quality-of-life (P = 0.01). Self-efficacy was unrelated to psychosocial quality-of-life for partnered women; for unpartnered women, low self-efficacy was associated with poorer quality-of-life. Partner status did not moderate the relationships between sexual problems or self-efficacy with sexual satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS Greater sexual problems and lower sexual self-efficacy were associated with poorer psychosocial quality-of-life and sexual satisfaction among postmenopausal breast cancer survivors taking AET. Interventions to address sexual problems and sexual self-efficacy, particularly among unpartnered women, may be beneficial for improving the well-being of postmenopausal breast cancer survivors on AET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline S Dorfman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Sarah S Arthur
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Gretchen G Kimmick
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | | | - Cheyenne Corbett
- Duke Supportive Care and Survivorship Center, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Sara N Edmond
- Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidity & Education (PRIME) Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Rebecca A Shelby
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Iioka Y, Iwata T, Yamauchi H. Symptoms and QOL in breast cancer patients receiving hormone therapy in Japan. Breast Cancer 2019; 27:62-69. [PMID: 31297685 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-019-00993-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim was to clarify subjective symptoms and quality of life (QOL) in breast cancer patients receiving hormone therapy. METHODS After obtaining approval from the research ethics committee, an observational study using a self-administered questionnaire was conducted at outpatient clinical oncology offices in 3 facilities that targeted breast cancer patients under the age of 50 who had been undergoing hormone therapy for less than 1 year. The study examined elements such as the breast cancer patients' basic information, symptoms, pain in daily life, QOL, and depression/anxiety. RESULTS There were 214 valid responses. The respondents had an average age of 43.6. Of them, 100% were also treated with Tamoxifen and 30% with LH-RH agonist. There were 75% who were cognizant of side effects. Difficult symptoms that occurred with high frequency were stiff shoulders/back pain, decreased physical strength, hot flashes, and sweating. Over half the respondents were uncertain as to whether the subjective symptoms were side effects. They lost confidence in their physical strength and felt distressed over weight gain. There were 51 with a HADS anxiety score of 8 or higher, and 46 who scored 8 points or higher for depression. CONCLUSION Breast cancer patients undergoing hormone therapy experience a variety of pains, and some also have serious psychological symptoms. Reassessing support systems to examine screening and self-care support is an issue going forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yukiko Iioka
- Graduate Course of Health and Social Services, Saitama Prefectural University, 820 San-Nomiya, Koshigaya-shi, Saitama, 343-8540, Japan.
| | - Takako Iwata
- Department of Breast Center, St Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan
| | - Hideko Yamauchi
- Department of Breast Center, St Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wassermann J, Gelber SI, Rosenberg SM, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Meyer ME, Partridge AH. Nonadherent behaviors among young women on adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. Cancer 2019; 125:3266-3274. [PMID: 31120571 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Revised: 03/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young age is a known factor associated with suboptimal adherence to endocrine therapy (ET) for adjuvant breast cancer (BC) treatment. This study was aimed at assessing nonadherent behaviors and associated factors among young women with early-stage hormone receptor-positive BC. METHODS As part of a multicenter, prospective cohort of women with a diagnosis of BC at or under the age of 40 years, participants were surveyed 30 months after their diagnosis about adherent behaviors. Among those who reported taking ET, adherence was measured with a 3-item Likert-type scale: Do you ever forget to take your ET? If you feel worse when you take your ET, do you stop taking it? Did you take your ET exactly as directed by your doctor over the last 3 months? Women reporting at least 1 nonadherent behavior were classified as nonadherers. Variables with a P value <.20 were included in a multivariable logistic model. RESULTS Among 384 women, 194 (51%) were classified as nonadherers. Univariate factors that retained significance in the multivariable model included educational level (odds ratio [OR], 0.50 for high vs low; P = .04), level of social support according to the Medical Outcome Study Social Support Survey (OR, 0.98 per 1 point; P = .01), and confidence with the decision regarding ET measured on a 0 to 10 numerical scale (OR, 0.63 for high vs low; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS Findings from this study could help to identify young patients at higher risk for nonadherence. Interventions adapted to the level of education and aimed at reinforcing support and patients' confidence in their decision to take ET could improve adherence and associated outcomes in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Wassermann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sorbonne University, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research, Paris, France
| | - Shari I Gelber
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shoshana M Rosenberg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Rulla M Tamimi
- Department of Medicine, Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lidia Schapira
- Department of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, California
| | - Virginia F Borges
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Steven E Come
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Meghan E Meyer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Influence of adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy on disease-free and overall survival: a population-based study in Catalonia, Spain. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 175:733-740. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05201-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2019] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
33
|
Pieters HC, Green E, Khakshooy S, Sleven M, Stanton AL. A qualitative comparison of how older breast cancer survivors process treatment information regarding endocrine therapy. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0210972. [PMID: 30703119 PMCID: PMC6354984 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It remains unclear how information about aromatase inhibitors (AI) impacts women's decision-making about persistence with endocrine therapy. PURPOSE To describe and compare how women treated for primary early stage breast cancer either persisting or not persisting with an AI received, interpreted, and acted upon AI-related information. DESIGN Thematic analysis was used to sort and compare the data into the most salient themes. PARTICIPANTS Women (N = 54; 27 persisting, 27 not persisting with an AI) aged 65-93 years took part in qualitative interviews. RESULTS Women in both subgroups described information similarly in terms of its value, volume, type, and source. Aspects of AI-related information that either differed between the subgroups or were misunderstood by one or both subgroups included: (1) knowledge of AI or tamoxifen prior to cancer diagnosis, (2) use of online resources, (3) misconceptions about estrogen, hormone replacement therapies and AI-related symptoms, and (4) risk perception and the meaning and use of recurrence statistics such as Oncotype DX. CONCLUSIONS Persisters and nonpersisters were similar in their desire for more information about potential side effects and symptom management at AI prescription and subsequent appointments. Differences included how information was obtained and interpreted. Interactive discussion questions are shared that can incorporate these findings into clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huibrie C Pieters
- School of Nursing, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States of America
| | - Emily Green
- School of Nursing, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States of America
| | - Sally Khakshooy
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, United States of America
| | - Miriam Sleven
- Torrance Memorial Medical Center, Torrance, California, United States of America
| | - Annette L Stanton
- Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Shelby RA, Dorfman CS, Bosworth HB, Keefe F, Sutton L, Owen L, Corsino L, Erkanli A, Reed SD, Arthur SS, Somers T, Barrett N, Huettel S, Gonzalez JM, Kimmick G. Testing a behavioral intervention to improve adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET). Contemp Clin Trials 2019; 76:120-131. [PMID: 30472215 PMCID: PMC6346744 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Revised: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) is used to prevent recurrence and reduce mortality for women with hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Poor adherence to AET is a significant problem and contributes to increased medical costs and mortality. A variety of problematic symptoms associated with AET are related to non-adherence and early discontinuation of treatment. The goal of this study is to test a novel, telephone-based coping skills training that teaches patients adherence skills and techniques for coping with problematic symptoms (CST-AET). Adherence to AET will be assessed in real-time for 18 months using wireless smart pill bottles. Symptom interference (i.e., pain, vasomotor symptoms, sleep problems, vaginal dryness) and cost-effectiveness of the intervention protocol will be examined as secondary outcomes. Participants (N = 400) will be recruited from a tertiary care medical center or community clinics in medically underserved or rural areas. Participants will be randomized to receive CST-AET or a general health education intervention (comparison condition). CST-AET includes ten nurse-delivered calls delivered over 6 months. CST-AET provides systematic training in coping skills for managing symptoms that interfere with adherence. Interactive voice messaging provides reinforcement for skills use and adherence that is tailored based on real-time adherence data from the wireless smart pill bottles. Given the high rates of non-adherence and recent recommendations that women remain on AET for 10 years, we describe a timely trial. If effective, the CST-AET protocol may not only reduce the burden of AET use but also lead to cost-effective changes in clinical care and improve breast cancer outcomes. Trials registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02707471, registered 3/3/2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A Shelby
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Caroline S Dorfman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Hayden B Bosworth
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States; Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Francis Keefe
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Linda Sutton
- Duke Cancer Network, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Lynda Owen
- Duke Cancer Network, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Leonor Corsino
- Division of Endocrinology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Alaattin Erkanli
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Shelby D Reed
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States; Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Sarah S Arthur
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Tamara Somers
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Nadine Barrett
- Office of Health Equity and Disparities, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Scott Huettel
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Juan Marcos Gonzalez
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Gretchen Kimmick
- Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Finitsis DJ, Vose BA, Mahalak JG, Salner AL. Interventions to promote adherence to endocrine therapy among breast cancer survivors: A meta‐analysis. Psychooncology 2018; 28:255-263. [PMID: 30511789 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2018] [Revised: 10/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David J. Finitsis
- Hartford HealthCare Cancer InstituteHartford Hospital Hartford Connecticut
- Department of PsychiatryYale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut
| | - Brittany A. Vose
- Hartford HealthCare Cancer InstituteHartford Hospital Hartford Connecticut
| | - Justin G. Mahalak
- Hartford HealthCare Cancer InstituteHartford Hospital Hartford Connecticut
| | - Andrew L. Salner
- Hartford HealthCare Cancer InstituteHartford Hospital Hartford Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sitlinger A, Shelby RA, Van Denburg AN, White H, Edmond SN, Marcom PK, Bosworth HB, Keefe FJ, Kimmick GG. Higher symptom burden is associated with lower function in women taking adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2018; 10:317-321. [PMID: 30553719 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2018] [Revised: 09/06/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the impact of symptoms on physical function in women on adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. METHODS Eligible women were postmenopausal, had hormone receptor positive, stage I-IIIA breast cancer, completed surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, and on adjuvant endocrine therapy. At a routine follow-up visit, women (N = 107) completed standardized symptom measures: Brief Fatigue Inventory, Brief Pain Inventory, Menopause Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Neurotoxicity scales. Two performance measures assessed function: grip strength (Jamar dynamometer; n = 71) and timed get-up-and-go (TUG; n = 103). Analyses were performed with an overall symptom composite score. Correlations and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to test adverse effects on physical function. RESULTS The mean age was 64 years (range 45-84), 81% white, 84% on an aromatase inhibitor, and on endocrine therapy for mean 35 months (range 1-130 months). Dominant hand grip strength was inversely correlated with symptom composite scores (r = -0.29, p = .02). Slower TUG was positively correlated with higher Charlson comorbidity level (r = 0.36, p < .001) and higher symptom composite scores (r = 0.24, p = .01). In multivariate analyses, weaker dominant and non-dominant hand grip strength were significantly associated with greater symptom composite scores (β = -0.27, t = 2.43, p = .02 and β = -0.36, t = 3.15, p = .003, respectively) and slower TUG was associated with higher symptom composite scores (β = 0.18, t = 1.97, p = .05). CONCLUSIONS Higher symptom burden is associated with worse physical function, as measured by hand grip strength and TUG. Further study to determine the impact of endocrine therapy and its side effects on function is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Sitlinger
- Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Rebecca A Shelby
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, 2200 W. Main St, Ste 340, Durham, NC 27705, United States
| | - Alyssa N Van Denburg
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, 2200 W. Main St, Ste 340, Durham, NC 27705, United States
| | - Heidi White
- Center for Aging, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Sarah N Edmond
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, 2200 W. Main St, Ste 340, Durham, NC 27705, United States
| | - Paul K Marcom
- Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Hayden B Bosworth
- Center for Health Services Research, Durham VAMC, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Francis J Keefe
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Population Health Science, Duke University Medical Center, 2200 W. Main St, Ste 340, Durham, NC 27705, United States
| | - Gretchen G Kimmick
- Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Heiney SP, Parker PD, Felder TM, Adams SA, Omofuma OO, Hulett JM. A systematic review of interventions to improve adherence to endocrine therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018. [PMID: 30387003 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-5012-7.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adherence to endocrine therapy for hormone positive breast cancer is a significant problem, especially in minority populations. Further, endocrine therapy reduces recurrence and thus mortality. However, little data are available on interventions to improve adherence. The authors conducted a systematic review to examine the impact of interventions, strategies, or approaches aimed to improve endocrine therapy adherence among women with breast cancer. A secondary aim was to determine if interventions had any cultural modifications. METHODS Two of the authors examined articles published between 2006 and 2017 from a wide variety of databases using Covidence systematic review platform. RESULTS In total, 16 eligible studies met criteria for review including 4 randomized controlled trials, 4 retrospective studies, and 8 with various observational designs. Eligible studies used a broad range of definitions for adherence and measured adherence by self-report, medical records, claims data, and combinations of these. All used 80% medication possession ratio as a standard for adherence. Patient information/education was the most frequent intervention strategy but did not demonstrate a significant effect except in one study. Significant results were noted when education was combined with communication strategies. CONCLUSIONS Researchers need a standard definition for adherence and a reliable measure that is feasible to use in a variety of studies. While education may be a necessary component of an intervention, when used alone, it is not a sufficient approach to change behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue P Heiney
- College of Nursing, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, 1601 Greene St, Columbia, 29208, SC, USA.
| | | | - Tisha M Felder
- College of Nursing, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
| | - Swann Arp Adams
- College of Nursing, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
| | - Omonefe O Omofuma
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Heiney SP, Parker PD, Felder TM, Adams SA, Omofuma OO, Hulett JM. A systematic review of interventions to improve adherence to endocrine therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 173:499-510. [PMID: 30387003 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-5012-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adherence to endocrine therapy for hormone positive breast cancer is a significant problem, especially in minority populations. Further, endocrine therapy reduces recurrence and thus mortality. However, little data are available on interventions to improve adherence. The authors conducted a systematic review to examine the impact of interventions, strategies, or approaches aimed to improve endocrine therapy adherence among women with breast cancer. A secondary aim was to determine if interventions had any cultural modifications. METHODS Two of the authors examined articles published between 2006 and 2017 from a wide variety of databases using Covidence systematic review platform. RESULTS In total, 16 eligible studies met criteria for review including 4 randomized controlled trials, 4 retrospective studies, and 8 with various observational designs. Eligible studies used a broad range of definitions for adherence and measured adherence by self-report, medical records, claims data, and combinations of these. All used 80% medication possession ratio as a standard for adherence. Patient information/education was the most frequent intervention strategy but did not demonstrate a significant effect except in one study. Significant results were noted when education was combined with communication strategies. CONCLUSIONS Researchers need a standard definition for adherence and a reliable measure that is feasible to use in a variety of studies. While education may be a necessary component of an intervention, when used alone, it is not a sufficient approach to change behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue P Heiney
- College of Nursing, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, 1601 Greene St, Columbia, 29208, SC, USA.
| | | | - Tisha M Felder
- College of Nursing, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
| | - Swann Arp Adams
- College of Nursing, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
| | - Omonefe O Omofuma
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Chalela P, Munoz E, Inupakutika D, Kaghyan S, Akopian D, Kaklamani V, Lathrop K, Ramirez A. Improving adherence to endocrine hormonal therapy among breast cancer patients: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2018; 12:109-115. [PMID: 30377674 PMCID: PMC6202663 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2018] [Revised: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 10/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Adjuvant endocrine hormonal therapy (EHT) is highly effective and appropriate for nearly all breast cancer patients with hormone receptor-positive tumors, which represent 75% of all breast cancer diagnoses. Long-term use of EHT reduces recurrence rates and nearly halves the risk of death during the second decade after diagnosis. Despite the proven benefits, about 33% of women receiving EHT do not take their medication as prescribed. This causes an increase in the risk for recurrence and death. To promote adherence to EHT among breast cancer patients, this study will develop and pilot-test an intervention consisting of 1) a bilingual, culturally tailored, personalized, interactive smartphone application (app); and 2) support from a patient navigator. The control group will receive usual care. This 2-group randomized control trial will recruit 120 breast cancer patients receiving EHT at the Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio. The two-year study will have 3-time assessments (baseline, 3 and 6 months). This theory-based intervention will empower patients' self-monitoring and management. It will facilitate patient education, identification/reporting of side effects, delivery of self-care advice, and simplify communication between the patient and the oncology team. The ultimate goal of this innovative multi-communication intervention is to improve overall survival and life expectancy, enhance quality of life, reduce recurrence, and decrease healthcare cost. The anticipated outcome is a scalable, evidence-based, and easily disseminated intervention with potentially broad use to patients using EHT and other oral anticancer agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Chalela
- Institute for Health Promotion Research, UT Health San Antonio, USA
| | - E Munoz
- Institute for Health Promotion Research, UT Health San Antonio, USA
| | | | - S Kaghyan
- University of Texas at San Antonio, USA
| | - D Akopian
- University of Texas at San Antonio, USA
| | - V Kaklamani
- Mays Cancer Center, UT Health San Antonio, USA
| | - K Lathrop
- Mays Cancer Center, UT Health San Antonio, USA
| | - A Ramirez
- Institute for Health Promotion Research, UT Health San Antonio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Graetz I, McKillop CN, Stepanski E, Vidal GA, Anderson JN, Schwartzberg LS. Use of a web-based app to improve breast cancer symptom management and adherence for aromatase inhibitors: a randomized controlled feasibility trial. J Cancer Surviv 2018; 12:431-440. [PMID: 29492753 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-018-0682-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 02/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE For postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, long-term use of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) significantly reduces the risk of cancer recurrence and improves survival. Still, many patients are nonadherent due to adverse side effects. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial to test the use of a web-based application (app) designed with and without weekly reminders for patients to report real-time symptoms and AI use outside of clinic visits with built-in alerts to patients' oncology providers. Our goal was to improve symptom burden and medication adherence. METHODS Forty-four women with early-stage breast cancer and a new AI prescription were randomized to either an App+Reminder (weekly reminders to use app) or an App (no reminders) group. Pre- and post-assessment data were collected from all participants. RESULTS Participants in the App+Reminder group had higher weekly app usage rate (74 vs. 38%, p < 0.05) during the intervention and reported higher AI adherence at 8 weeks (100 vs. 72%, p < 0.05). Symptom burden increase was higher for the App group compared to the App+Reminder group but did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS Weekly reminders to use a web-based app to report AI adherence and treatment-related symptoms demonstrated feasibility and improved short-term AI adherence, which may reduce symptom burden for women with breast cancer and a new AI prescription. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS If short-term gains in adherence persist, this low-cost intervention could improve survival outcomes for women with breast cancer. A larger, long-term study should examine if AI adherence and symptom burden improvements persist for a 5-year treatment period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilana Graetz
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 66 N. Pauline St., Ste. 633, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA.
| | - Caitlin N McKillop
- Department of Economics, State University of New York at Cortland, 28 Graham Ave., Cortland, NY, 13045, USA
| | - Edward Stepanski
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 66 N. Pauline St., Ste. 633, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA.,Vector Oncology, 6555 Quince Rd #400, Memphis, TN, 38119, USA
| | - Gregory A Vidal
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 66 N. Pauline St., Ste. 633, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA.,West Cancer Center, 7945 Wolf River Blvd, Germantown, TN, 38138, USA
| | - Janeane N Anderson
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 66 N. Pauline St., Ste. 633, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA
| | - Lee S Schwartzberg
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 66 N. Pauline St., Ste. 633, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA.,Vector Oncology, 6555 Quince Rd #400, Memphis, TN, 38119, USA.,West Cancer Center, 7945 Wolf River Blvd, Germantown, TN, 38138, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Patient-reported factors associated with adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy after breast cancer: an integrative review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 167:615-633. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4561-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2017] [Accepted: 10/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
42
|
Robinson B, Dijkstra B, Davey V, Tomlinson S, Frampton C. Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Christchurch Women with Early Breast Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2017; 30:e9-e15. [PMID: 29103853 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2017] [Revised: 08/16/2017] [Accepted: 10/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To assess adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy by a real-world cohort of women in Christchurch and to determine any associated factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Records were retrieved of all women newly diagnosed with early breast cancer and registered on the Christchurch Breast Cancer Patient Register over 4 years from June 2009. Demographic and pathological factors, dates of starting and stopping endocrine therapies and reported side-effects were collected. The proportion remaining on endocrine therapy was analysed by Kaplan-Meier curve; Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent factors influencing adherence. RESULTS Of 1213 women, 1018 (83.9%) had oestrogen receptor-positive tumours, of whom 674 (66.2%) started adjuvant endocrine therapy, including 62 (9.2%) neoadjuvantly. Uptake was 52.4% of those with T1 tumours, 89% with T2 tumours, 93% with T3/T4 tumours, 92.7% with node-positive tumours and 49.7% with node-negative tumours. The initial endocrine therapy was an aromatase inhibitor in 254 (38%) and tamoxifen for 412 (61%). At 1 year, 90% remained adherent, at 2 years 84%, at 3 years 81%, at 4 years 76%, at 4.5 years 71% and at 5 years 50%, with a median duration of 60 months (56-64 months, 95% confidence interval) and a median follow-up of 33 months. Overall, 135 (20%) women stopped treatment for adverse events or poor tolerability. A longer persistence with endocrine therapy was associated with node-positive tumours (hazard ratio 1.38, P = 0.003), but not first hormone used; aromatase inhibitor compared with tamoxifen, P = 0.76. CONCLUSION Adjuvant endocrine therapy use fell to 50% by 5 years, limiting possible survival benefits, providing support for efforts to increase compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Robinson
- University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand; Oncology Service, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand; Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.
| | - B Dijkstra
- Department of General Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - V Davey
- Department of General Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - S Tomlinson
- University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - C Frampton
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Moon Z, Moss-Morris R, Hunter MS, Hughes LD. More than just side-effects: The role of clinical and psychosocial factors in non-adherence to tamoxifen. Br J Health Psychol 2017; 22:998-1018. [DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2017] [Revised: 08/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe Moon
- Institute of Psychiatry; Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN); Health Psychology Section; King's College London UK
| | - Rona Moss-Morris
- Institute of Psychiatry; Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN); Health Psychology Section; King's College London UK
| | - Myra S. Hunter
- Institute of Psychiatry; Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN); Health Psychology Section; King's College London UK
| | - Lyndsay D. Hughes
- Institute of Psychiatry; Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN); Health Psychology Section; King's College London UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Provider perspectives on barriers and facilitators to adjuvant endocrine therapy-related symptom management. Support Care Cancer 2017; 25:3723-3731. [PMID: 28681126 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-017-3799-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2017] [Accepted: 06/12/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) utilization is linked to improved clinical outcomes among breast cancer survivors (BCS); yet, AET adherence rates remain suboptimal. Little is known about provider perspectives regarding barriers and facilitators to AET-related symptom management (SM). In this study, we examined provider perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to AET-related SM among BCS and opportunities for improvement. METHODS We conducted three focus groups (FGs) with a multidisciplinary group of healthcare providers (n = 13) experienced in caring for BCS undergoing AET. We utilized semi-structured discussion guides to elicit provider perspectives on AET-related SM. FGs were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative software to identify key themes. RESULTS Providers described patient-, provider-, and system-level barriers and facilitators to AET-related SM. At the patient-level, barriers included competing demands, limited time/resources, and possible misattribution of some symptoms to AET, while family/social relationships and insurance emerged as important facilitators. Discomfort with SM, limited time, and challenges distinguishing AET-related symptoms from other conditions were key provider-level barriers. Provider-level facilitators included routine symptom documentation and strong provider relationships. Care fragmentation and complexity of the cancer care delivery system were described as system-level barriers; however, survivor clinics were endorsed by providers. CONCLUSIONS Provider perspectives on AET-related SM can shed light on SM barriers and facilitators spanning multiple levels of the cancer care delivery system. Strategies for improving AET-related SM in BCS include increasing patients' knowledge and engagement in SM, equipping providers with efficient SM strategies, and improving coordination of symptom-related services through survivorship programs.
Collapse
|
45
|
Breast cancer oral anti-cancer medication adherence: a systematic review of psychosocial motivators and barriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 165:247-260. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4317-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2017] [Accepted: 05/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
46
|
Pinheiro LC, Wheeler SB, Reeder-Hayes KE, Samuel CA, Olshan AF, Reeve BB. Investigating Associations Between Health-Related Quality of Life and Endocrine Therapy Underuse in Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer. J Oncol Pract 2017; 13:e463-e473. [PMID: 28291383 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2016.018630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Endocrine therapy (ET) underuse puts women at increased risk for breast cancer (BC) recurrence. Our objective was to determine if health-related quality of life (HRQOL) subgroups were associated with underuse. METHODS Data came from the third phase of the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. We included 1,599 women with hormone receptor-positive BC age 20 to 74 years. HRQOL was measured, on average, 5 months postdiagnosis. Subgroups were derived using latent profile (LP) analysis. Underuse was defined as not initiating or adhering to ET by 36 months postdiagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) between HRQOL LPs and underuse. The best HRQOL LP was the reference. Chemotherapy- and race-stratified models were estimated, separately. RESULTS Initiation analyses included 953 women who had not begun ET by their 5-month survey. Of these, 154 never initiated ET. Adherence analyses included 1,114 ET initiators, of whom 211 were nonadherent. HRQOL was not significantly associated with noninitiation, except among nonchemotherapy users, with membership in the poorest LP associated with increased odds of noninitiation (adjusted OR, 5.5; 95% CI, 1.7 to 17.4). Membership in the poorest LPs was associated with nonadherence (LP1: adjusted OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2 to 4.0 and LP2: adjusted OR,1.9; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.6). Membership in the poorest LP was associated with nonadherence among nonchemotherapy users (adjusted OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.1). CONCLUSION Our results suggest women with poor HRQOL during active treatment may be at increased risk for ET underuse. Focusing on HRQOL, a modifiable factor, may improve targeting of future interventions early in the BC continuum to improve ET initiation and adherence and prevent BC recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura C Pinheiro
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Katherine E Reeder-Hayes
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Cleo A Samuel
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Andrew F Olshan
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Bryce B Reeve
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Karmakar M, Pinto SL, Jordan TR, Mohamed I, Holiday-Goodman M. Predicting Adherence to Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy among Breast Cancer Survivors: An Application of the Protection Motivation Theory. BREAST CANCER-BASIC AND CLINICAL RESEARCH 2017; 11:1178223417694520. [PMID: 28469437 PMCID: PMC5391055 DOI: 10.1177/1178223417694520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2016] [Accepted: 11/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this observational study was to determine if the Protection Motivation Theory could predict and explain adherence to aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy among breast cancer survivors. Purposive sampling was used to identify 288 survivors who had been prescribed AI therapy. A valid and reliable survey was mailed to survivors. A total of 145 survivors completed the survey. The Morisky scale was used to measure adherence to AI. The survivors reported a mean score of 6.84 (±0.66) on the scale. Nearly 4 in 10 survivors (38%) were non-adherent. Adherence differed by age, marital status, insurance status, income, and presence of co-morbid conditions. Self-efficacy (r=0.485), protection motivation (r=0.310), and Response Efficacy (r=0.206) were positively and significantly correlated with adherence. Response Cost (r=-0.235) was negatively correlated with adherence. The coping appraisal constructs were statistically significant predictors medication adherence (β=0.437) with self-efficacy being the strongest significant predictor of adherence (β = 0.429).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monita Karmakar
- School of Population Health, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA
| | - Sharrel L Pinto
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA
| | - Timothy R Jordan
- School of Population Health, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA
| | - Iman Mohamed
- Department of Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Moon Z, Moss-Morris R, Hunter MS, Carlisle S, Hughes LD. Barriers and facilitators of adjuvant hormone therapy adherence and persistence in women with breast cancer: a systematic review. Patient Prefer Adherence 2017; 11:305-322. [PMID: 28260867 PMCID: PMC5328144 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s126651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Nonadherence to hormone therapy in breast cancer survivors is common and associated with increased risk of mortality. Consistent predictors of nonadherence and nonpersistence are yet to be identified, and little research has examined psychosocial factors that may be amenable to change through intervention. This review aimed to identify predictors of nonadherence and nonpersistence to hormone therapy in breast cancer survivors in order to inform development of an intervention to increase adherence rates. METHODS Studies published up to April 2016 were identified through MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL and gray literature. Studies published in English measuring associations between adherence or persistence and any predictor variables were included. Eligible studies were assessed for methodological quality, data were extracted and a narrative synthesis was conducted. RESULTS Sixty-one eligible articles were identified. Most studies focused on clinical and demographic factors with inconsistent results. Some evidence suggested that receiving specialist care and social support were related to increased persistence, younger age and increased number of hospitalizations were associated with nonadherence, and good patient-physician relationship and self-efficacy for taking medication were associated with better adherence. A small amount of evidence suggested that medication beliefs were associated with adherence, but more high-quality research is needed to confirm this. CONCLUSION Some psychosocial variables were associated with better adherence and persistence, but the results are currently tentative. Future high-quality research should be carried out to identify psychosocial determinants of nonadherence or nonpersistence that are modifiable through intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe Moon
- Health Psychology Section, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Rona Moss-Morris
- Health Psychology Section, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Myra S Hunter
- Health Psychology Section, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sophie Carlisle
- Health Psychology Section, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Lyndsay D Hughes
- Health Psychology Section, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
|