1
|
Pharmacokinetics of Tamoxifen and Its Major Metabolites and the Effect of the African Ancestry Specific CYP2D6*17 Variant on the Formation of the Active Metabolite, Endoxifen. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13020272. [PMID: 36836506 PMCID: PMC9961245 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13020272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Tamoxifen (TAM) is widely used in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. TAM is metabolized into the active secondary metabolite endoxifen (ENDO), primarily by CYP2D6. We aimed to investigate the effects of an African-specific CYP2D6 variant allele, CYP2D6*17, on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of TAM and its active metabolites in 42 healthy black Zimbabweans. Subjects were grouped based on CYP2D6 genotypes as CYP2D6*1/*1 or *1/*2 or *2/*2 (CYP2D6*1 or *2), CYP2D6*1/*17 or 2*/*17, and CYP2D6*17/*17. PK parameters for TAM and three metabolites were determined. The pharmacokinetics of ENDO showed statistically significant differences among the three groups. The mean ENDO AUC0-∞ in CYP2D6*17/*17 subjects was 452.01 (196.94) h·*ng/mL, and the AUC0-∞ in CYP2D6*1/*17 subjects was 889.74 h·ng/mL, which was 5-fold and 2.8-fold lower than in CYP2D6*1 or *2 subjects, respectively. Individuals who were heterozygous or homozygous for CYP2D6*17 alleles showed a 2- and 5-fold decrease in Cmax, respectively, compared to the CYP2D6*1 or *2 genotype. CYP2D6*17 gene carriers have significantly lower ENDO exposure levels than CYP2D6*1 or *2 gene carriers. Pharmacokinetic parameters of TAM and the two primary metabolites, N-desmethyl tamoxifen (NDT) and 4-hydroxy tamoxifen (4OHT), did not show any significant difference in the three genotype groups. The African-specific CYP2D6*17 variant had effects on ENDO exposure levels that could potentially have clinical implications for patients homozygous for this variant.
Collapse
|
2
|
Braal CL, Jager A, Hoop EOD, Westenberg JD, Lommen KMWT, de Bruijn P, Vastbinder MB, van Rossum-Schornagel QC, Thijs-Visser MF, van Alphen RJ, Struik LEM, Zuetenhorst HJM, Mathijssen RHJ, Koolen SLW. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Endoxifen for Tamoxifen Precision Dosing: Feasible in Patients with Hormone-Sensitive Breast Cancer. Clin Pharmacokinet 2021; 61:527-537. [PMID: 34786650 PMCID: PMC8975771 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-021-01077-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Background Endoxifen is the most important active metabolite of tamoxifen. Several retrospective studies have suggested a minimal or threshold endoxifen systemic concentration of 14–16 nM is required for a lower recurrence rate. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of reaching a predefined endoxifen level of ≥ 16 nM (5.97 ng/mL) over time using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Methods This prospective open-label intervention study enrolled patients who started treatment with a standard dose of tamoxifen 20 mg once daily for early breast cancer. An outpatient visit was combined with a TDM sample at 3, 4.5, and 6 months after initiation of the tamoxifen treatment. The tamoxifen dose was escalated to a maximum of 40 mg if patients had an endoxifen concentration < 16 nM. The primary endpoint of the study was the percentage of patients with an endoxifen level ≥ 16 nM at 6 months after the start of therapy compared with historical data, in other words, 80% of patients with endoxifen levels ≥ 16 nM with standard therapy. Results In total, 145 patients were included. After 6 months, 89% of the patients had endoxifen levels ≥ 16 nM, compared with a literature-based 80% of patients with endoxifen levels ≥ 16 nM at baseline (95% confidence interval 82–94; P = 0.007). In patients with an affected CYP2D6 allele, it was not always feasible to reach the predefined endoxifen level of ≥ 16 nM. No increase in tamoxifen-related adverse events was reported after dose escalation. Conclusion This study demonstrated that it is feasible to increase the percentage of patients with endoxifen levels ≥ 16 nM using TDM. TDM is a safe strategy that offers the possibility of nearly halving the number of patients with endoxifen levels < 16 nM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Louwrens Braal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Oomen-de Hoop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Justin D Westenberg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Koen M W T Lommen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter de Bruijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mijntje B Vastbinder
- Department of Internal Medicine, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | | | - Martine F Thijs-Visser
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Spijkenisse MC, Spijkenisse, The Netherlands
| | - Robbert J van Alphen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth E M Struik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stijn L W Koolen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Qi Y, Liu G. A UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of nine antiepileptic drugs in human plasma and its application in TDM. Biomed Chromatogr 2021; 35:e5090. [PMID: 33587760 DOI: 10.1002/bmc.5090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
With the purpose of carrying out therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of nine antiepileptic drugs simultaneously in the clinic, a UPLC-MS/MS assay method was developed and validated. Separation of antiepileptic drugs and internal standard (naproxen and diazepam) was performed on an Agilent Eclipse XDB-C18 column (50.0 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm) using water and acetonitrile as mobile phase for gradient elution. Polarity switch ionization mode (positive-negative-positive) was performed in a total run time of 3.0 min. The method validation was conducted based on bioanalytical method validation guidance, including specificity, calibration curve, precision, accuracy, recovery, matrix effect, stability and dilution integrity, and all of the results satisfied the requirements. Consequently, the proposed method was applied to the TDM of nine antiepileptic drugs and was proved to be sensitive, reliable and specific to determine antiepileptic drugs in human plasma simultaneously. Meanwhile, the TDM results showed that the plasma drug concentration of many patients was not within the effective therapeutic range, especially those taking topiramate, oxcarbazepine and levetiracetam, which was of great guiding significance to rational drug use and timely adjustment of the treatment plan. Therefore, individualized therapy based on advanced analytical methods and TDM theory is of great practical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingjie Qi
- Department of Pharmacy, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Guangxuan Liu
- Department of Pharmacy, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jeiziner C, Stäuble CK, Lampert ML, Hersberger KE, Meyer Zu Schwabedissen HE. Enriching Medication Review with a Pharmacogenetic Profile - A Case of Tamoxifen Adverse Drug Reactions. PHARMACOGENOMICS & PERSONALIZED MEDICINE 2021; 14:279-286. [PMID: 33642872 PMCID: PMC7903951 DOI: 10.2147/pgpm.s285807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Pharmacogenotyping is applied to determine the hereditable component of a patient's susceptibility to experience therapy failure and/or adverse drug reactions (ADRs). We present the case of a female patient diagnosed with breast cancer and treated with tamoxifen as recurrence therapy who experienced various ADRs. Pharmacogenotyping revealed variants in the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes CYP2D6, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19. The observed genotype was associated with a risk for lower tamoxifen efficacy. Aside from the tamoxifen therapy, the comedication was reviewed for the influence of the patient’s pharmacogenetic profile. As a result of this pharmacist-led medication review with pharmacogenetic analyses, concrete genotype-driven recommendations for the treating gynecologist were compiled. This case revealed the added value of a large pharmacogenetic panel and the complexity of integrating a pharmacogenetic profile into a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Jeiziner
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Céline K Stäuble
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Biopharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Markus L Lampert
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Kurt E Hersberger
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mulder TAM, de With M, del Re M, Danesi R, Mathijssen RHJ, van Schaik RHN. Clinical CYP2D6 Genotyping to Personalize Adjuvant Tamoxifen Treatment in ER-Positive Breast Cancer Patients: Current Status of a Controversy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13040771. [PMID: 33673305 PMCID: PMC7917604 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Tamoxifen is an important adjuvant endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer patients. It is mainly catalyzed by the enzyme CYP2D6 into the most active metabolite endoxifen. Genetic variation in the CYP2D6 gene influences endoxifen formation and thereby potentially therapy outcome. However, the association between CYP2D6 genotype and clinical outcome on tamoxifen is still under debate, as contradictory outcomes have been published. This review describes the latest insights in both CYP2D6 genotype and endoxifen concentrations, as well CYP2D6 genotype and clinical outcome, from 2018 to 2020. Abstract Tamoxifen is a major option for adjuvant endocrine treatment in estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer patients. The conversion of the prodrug tamoxifen into the most active metabolite endoxifen is mainly catalyzed by the enzyme cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6). Genetic variation in the CYP2D6 gene leads to altered enzyme activity, which influences endoxifen formation and thereby potentially therapy outcome. The association between genetically compromised CYP2D6 activity and low endoxifen plasma concentrations is generally accepted, and it was shown that tamoxifen dose increments in compromised patients resulted in higher endoxifen concentrations. However, the correlation between CYP2D6 genotype and clinical outcome is still under debate. This has led to genotype-based tamoxifen dosing recommendations by the Clinical Pharmacogenetic Implementation Consortium (CPIC) in 2018, whereas in 2019, the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) discouraged the use of CYP2D6 genotyping in clinical practice for tamoxifen therapy. This paper describes the latest developments on CYP2D6 genotyping in relation to endoxifen plasma concentrations and tamoxifen-related clinical outcome. Therefore, we focused on Pharmacogenetic publications from 2018 (CPIC publication) to 2021 in order to shed a light on the current status of this debate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa A. M. Mulder
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (T.A.M.M.); (M.d.W.); (M.d.R.); (R.D.)
| | - Mirjam de With
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (T.A.M.M.); (M.d.W.); (M.d.R.); (R.D.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Wytemaweg 80, 3015CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Marzia del Re
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (T.A.M.M.); (M.d.W.); (M.d.R.); (R.D.)
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 55, Via Roma, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Romano Danesi
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (T.A.M.M.); (M.d.W.); (M.d.R.); (R.D.)
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 55, Via Roma, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Ron H. J. Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Wytemaweg 80, 3015CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Ron H. N. van Schaik
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (T.A.M.M.); (M.d.W.); (M.d.R.); (R.D.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-10-703-3119
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee CI, Low SK, Maldonado R, Fox P, Balakrishnar B, Coulter S, de Bruijn P, Koolen SLW, Gao B, Lynch J, Zdenkowski N, Hui R, Liddle C, Mathijssen RHJ, Wilcken N, Wong M, Gurney H. Simplified phenotyping of CYP2D6 for tamoxifen treatment using the N-desmethyl-tamoxifen/ endoxifen ratio. Breast 2020; 54:229-234. [PMID: 33161337 PMCID: PMC7653100 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION CYP2D6 protein activity can be inferred from the ratio of N-desmethyl-tamoxifen (NDMT) to endoxifen (E). CYP2D6 polymorphisms are common and can affect CYP2D6 protein activity and E level. Some retrospective studies indicate that E < 16 nM may relate to worse outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS A target NDMT/E ratio was defined as associated with an E level of 15 nM in the 161 patient Test cohort of tamoxifen-treated patients, dichotomizing them into 'Normal' (NM) and 'Slow' (SM) CYP2D6 metabolizer groups. This ratio was then tested on a validation cohort of 52 patients. Patients were phenotyped based on the standard method (ultrarapid/extensive, intermediate or poor metabolizers; UM/EM, IM, PM) or a simplified system based on whether any variant allele (V) vs wildtype (wt) was present (wt/wt, wt/V, V/V). Comprehensive CYP2D6 genotyping was undertaken on germline DNA. RESULTS A target NDMT/E ratio of 35 correlated with the 15 nM E level, dichotomizing patients into NM (<35; N = 117) and SM (>35; N = 44) groups. The ratio was independently validated by a validation cohort. The simplified system was better in predicting patients without slow metabolism, with specificity and sensitivity of 96% and 44% respectively, compared with the standard method - sensitivity 81% and specificity 83%. CONCLUSIONS The simplified classification system based on whether any variant was present better identified patients who were truly not CYP2D6 slow metabolizers more accurately than the current system. However, as CYP2D6 genotype is not the only determinant of endoxifen level, we recommend that direct measurement of endoxifen should also be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Inkyung Lee
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Bankstown, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Siew Kee Low
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | | | - Peter Fox
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
| | | | - Sally Coulter
- Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, Australia
| | - Peter de Bruijn
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Bo Gao
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
| | - Jodi Lynch
- St George Hospital, Kogarah, Australia; Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, Australia
| | | | - Rina Hui
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Christopher Liddle
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia; Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, Australia
| | | | - Nicholas Wilcken
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Mark Wong
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Howard Gurney
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia; Macquarie University, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Puszkiel A, Arellano C, Vachoux C, Evrard A, Le Morvan V, Boyer JC, Robert J, Delmas C, Dalenc F, Debled M, Venat-Bouvet L, Jacot W, Dohollou N, Bernard-Marty C, Laharie-Mineur H, Filleron T, Roché H, Chatelut E, Thomas F, White-Koning M. Model-Based Quantification of Impact of Genetic Polymorphisms and Co-Medications on Pharmacokinetics of Tamoxifen and Six Metabolites in Breast Cancer. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2020; 109:1244-1255. [PMID: 33047329 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Variations in clinical response to tamoxifen (TAM) may be related to polymorphic cytochromes P450 (CYPs) involved in forming its active metabolite endoxifen (ENDO). We developed a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model for tamoxifen and six metabolites to determine clinically relevant factors of ENDO exposure. Concentration-time data for TAM and 6 metabolites come from a prospective, multicenter, 3-year follow-up study of adjuvant TAM (20 mg/day) in patients with breast cancer, with plasma samples drawn every 6 months, and genotypes for 63 genetic polymorphisms (PHACS study, NCT01127295). Concentration data for TAM and 6 metabolites from 928 patients (n = 27,433 concentrations) were analyzed simultaneously with a 7-compartment PopPK model. CYP2D6 phenotype (poor metabolizer (PM), intermediate metabolizer (IM), normal metabolizer (NM), and ultra-rapid metabolizer (UM)), CYP3A4*22, CYP2C19*2, and CYP2B6*6 genotypes, concomitant CYP2D6 inhibitors, age, and body weight had a significant impact on TAM metabolism. Formation of ENDO from N-desmethyltamoxifen was decreased by 84% (relative standard error (RSE) = 14%) in PM patients and by 47% (RSE = 9%) in IM patients and increased in UM patients by 27% (RSE = 12%) compared with NM patients. Dose-adjustment simulations support an increase from 20 mg/day to 40 and 80 mg/day in IM patients and PM patients, respectively, to reach ENDO levels similar to those in NM patients. However, when considering Antiestrogenic Activity Score (AAS), a dose increase to 60 mg/day in PM patients seems sufficient. This PopPK model can be used as a tool to predict ENDO levels or AAS according to the patient's CYP2D6 phenotype for TAM dose adaptation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicja Puszkiel
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Cécile Arellano
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Christelle Vachoux
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Alexandre Evrard
- Laboratoire de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nîmes-Carémeau, Nîmes, France.,IRCM, Inserm, Université de Montpellier, ICM, Montpellier, France
| | - Valérie Le Morvan
- Inserm U1218, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jean-Christophe Boyer
- Laboratoire de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nîmes-Carémeau, Nîmes, France
| | - Jacques Robert
- Inserm U1218, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Caroline Delmas
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.,Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Florence Dalenc
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.,Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | - William Jacot
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Filleron
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Henri Roché
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Etienne Chatelut
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.,Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Fabienne Thomas
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.,Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Melanie White-Koning
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gusella M, Pasini F, Corso B, Bertolaso L, De Rosa G, Falci C, Modena Y, Barile C, Da Corte Z D, Fraccon A, Toso S, Cretella E, Brunello A, Modonesi C, Segati R, Oliani C, Minicuci N, Padrini R. Predicting steady-state endoxifen plasma concentrations in breast cancer patients by CYP2D6 genotyping or phenotyping. Which approach is more reliable? Pharmacol Res Perspect 2020; 8:e00646. [PMID: 32813313 PMCID: PMC7437348 DOI: 10.1002/prp2.646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
In previous studies, steady-state Z-endoxifen plasma concentrations (ENDOss) correlated with relapse-free survival in women on tamoxifen (TAM) treatment for breast cancer. ENDOss also correlated significantly with CYP2D6 genotype (activity score) and CYP2D6 phenotype (dextromethorphan test). Our aim was to ascertain which method for assessing CYP2D6 activity is more reliable in predicting ENDOss. The study concerned 203 Caucasian women on tamoxifen-adjuvant therapy (20 mg q.d.). Before starting treatment, CYP2D6 was genotyped (and activity scores computed), and the urinary log(dextromethorphan/dextrorphan) ratio [log(DM/DX)] was calculated after 15 mg of oral dextromethorphan. Plasma concentrations of TAM, N-desmethyl-tamoxifen (ND-TAM), Z-4OH-tamoxifen (4OH-TAM) and ENDO were assayed 1, 4, and 8 months after first administering TAM. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify the clinical and laboratory variables predicting log-transformed ENDOss (log-ENDOss). Genotype-derived CYP2D6 phenotypes (PM, IM, NM, EM) and log(DM/DX) correlated independently with log-ENDOss. Genotype-phenotype concordance was almost complete only for poor metabolizers, whereas it emerged that 34% of intermediate, normal, and ultrarapid metabolizers were classified differently based on log(DM/DX). Multivariable regression analysis selected log(DM/DX) as the best predictor, with patients' age, weak inhibitor use, and CYP2D6 phenotype decreasingly important: log-ENDOss = 0.162 - log(DM/DX) × 0.170 + age × 0.0063 - weak inhibitor use × 0.250 + IM × 0.105 + (NM + UM) × 0.210; (R2 = 0.51). In conclusion, log(DM/DX) seems superior to genotype-derived CYP2D6 phenotype in predicting ENDOss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Felice Pasini
- Oncology UnitCasa di Cura PederzoliPeschiera del GardaItaly
| | - Barbara Corso
- National Research CouncilNeuroscience InstitutePadovaItaly
| | | | - Giovanni De Rosa
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit of the Department of Medicine (DIMED)University of PadovaPadovaItaly
| | - Cristina Falci
- Oncology Unit 2Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IOV)IRCCS PadovaPadovaItaly
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Nadia Minicuci
- National Research CouncilNeuroscience InstitutePadovaItaly
| | - Roberto Padrini
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit of the Department of Medicine (DIMED)University of PadovaPadovaItaly
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Carr DF, Turner RM, Pirmohamed M. Pharmacogenomics of anticancer drugs: Personalising the choice and dose to manage drug response. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2020; 87:237-255. [PMID: 32501544 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The field of pharmacogenomics has made great strides in oncology over the last 20 years and indeed a significant number of pre-emptive genetic tests are now routinely undertaken prior to anticancer drug administration. Many of these gene-drug interactions are the fruits of candidate gene and genome-wide association studies, which have largely focused on common genetic variants (allele frequency>1%). Examples where there is clinical utility include genotyping or phenotyping for G6PD to prevent rasburicase-induced RBC haemolysis, and TPMT to prevent thiopurine-induced bone marrow suppression. Other associations such as CYP2D6 status in determining the efficacy of tamoxifen are more controversial because of contradictory evidence from different sources, which has led to variability in the implementation of testing. As genomic technology becomes ever cheaper and more accessible, we must look to the additional data our genome can provide to explain interindividual variability in anticancer drug response. Clearly genes do not act on their own and it is therefore important to investigate genetic factors in conjunction with clinical factors, interacting concomitant drug therapies and other factors such as the microbiome, which can all affect drug disposition. Taking account of all of these factors, in conjunction with the somatic genome, is more likely to provide better predictive accuracy in determining anticancer drug response, both efficacy and safety. This review summarises the existing knowledge related to the pharmacogenomics of anticancer drugs and discusses areas of opportunity for further advances in personalisation of therapy in order to improve both drug safety and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel F Carr
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Richard M Turner
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Munir Pirmohamed
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sanchez-Spitman AB, Moes DJAR, Swen JJ, Dezentjé VO, Lambrechts D, Neven P, Gelderblom H, Guchelaar HJ. Exposure-response analysis of endoxifen serum concentrations in early-breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2020; 85:1141-1152. [PMID: 32468081 PMCID: PMC7305085 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-020-04089-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
Tamoxifen is part of endocrine therapy in breast cancer treatment. Studies have indicated the use of endoxifen concentrations, tamoxifen active metabolite, to guide tamoxifen efficacy. Three endoxifen thresholds have been suggested (5.9 ng/ml, 5.2 ng/ml and 3.3 ng/ml) for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Our aim was to validate these thresholds and to examine endoxifen exposure with clinical outcome in early-breast cancer patients using tamoxifen. Methods Data from 667 patients from the CYPTAM study (NTR1509) were available. Patients were stratified (above or below), according to the endoxifen threshold values for tamoxifen efficacy and tested by Cox regression. Logistic regressions to estimate the probability of relapse and tamoxifen discontinuation were performed. Results None of the thresholds showed a statistically significant difference in relapse-free survival: 5.2 ng/ml threshold: hazard ratio (HR): 2.545, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.912–7.096, p value: 0.074; 3.3 ng/ml threshold: HR: 0.728; 95% CI 0.421–1.258, p value: 0.255. Logistic regression did not show a statistically significant association between the risk of relapse (odds ratio (OR): 0.971 (95% CI 0.923–1.021, p value: 0.248) and the risk for tamoxifen discontinuation (OR: 1.006 95% CI 0.961–1.053, p value: 0.798) with endoxifen concentrations. Conclusion Our findings do not confirm the endoxifen threshold values for TDM nor does it allow definition of a novel threshold. These findings indicate a limited value of TDM to guide tamoxifen efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anabel Beatriz Sanchez-Spitman
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Leiden Network for Personalised Therapeutics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk-Jan A R Moes
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Leiden Network for Personalised Therapeutics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jesse J Swen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Leiden Network for Personalised Therapeutics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent O Dezentjé
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium.,Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Patrick Neven
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hans Gelderblom
- Leiden Network for Personalised Therapeutics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Henk-Jan Guchelaar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. .,Leiden Network for Personalised Therapeutics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Braal CL, Beijnen JH, Koolen SL, Oomen-de Hoop E, Steeghs N, Jager A, Huitema AD, Mathijssen RH. Relevance of Endoxifen Concentrations: Absence of Evidence Is Not Evidence of Absence. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:1980-1981. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.00418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- C. Louwrens Braal
- C. Louwrens Braal, PharmD, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Jos H. Beijnen, PhD, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Stijn L.W. Koolen, PhD, PharmD and Esther Oomen-de Hoop, PhD, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Neeltje Steeghs, MD, PhD, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Agnes Jager, MD, PhD,
| | - Jos H. Beijnen
- C. Louwrens Braal, PharmD, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Jos H. Beijnen, PhD, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Stijn L.W. Koolen, PhD, PharmD and Esther Oomen-de Hoop, PhD, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Neeltje Steeghs, MD, PhD, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Agnes Jager, MD, PhD,
| | - Stijn L.W. Koolen
- C. Louwrens Braal, PharmD, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Jos H. Beijnen, PhD, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Stijn L.W. Koolen, PhD, PharmD and Esther Oomen-de Hoop, PhD, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Neeltje Steeghs, MD, PhD, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Agnes Jager, MD, PhD,
| | - Esther Oomen-de Hoop
- C. Louwrens Braal, PharmD, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Jos H. Beijnen, PhD, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Stijn L.W. Koolen, PhD, PharmD and Esther Oomen-de Hoop, PhD, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Neeltje Steeghs, MD, PhD, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Agnes Jager, MD, PhD,
| | - Neeltje Steeghs
- C. Louwrens Braal, PharmD, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Jos H. Beijnen, PhD, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Stijn L.W. Koolen, PhD, PharmD and Esther Oomen-de Hoop, PhD, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Neeltje Steeghs, MD, PhD, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Agnes Jager, MD, PhD,
| | - Agnes Jager
- C. Louwrens Braal, PharmD, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Jos H. Beijnen, PhD, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Stijn L.W. Koolen, PhD, PharmD and Esther Oomen-de Hoop, PhD, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Neeltje Steeghs, MD, PhD, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Agnes Jager, MD, PhD,
| | - Alwin D.R. Huitema
- C. Louwrens Braal, PharmD, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Jos H. Beijnen, PhD, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Stijn L.W. Koolen, PhD, PharmD and Esther Oomen-de Hoop, PhD, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Neeltje Steeghs, MD, PhD, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Agnes Jager, MD, PhD,
| | - Ron H.J. Mathijssen
- C. Louwrens Braal, PharmD, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Jos H. Beijnen, PhD, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Stijn L.W. Koolen, PhD, PharmD and Esther Oomen-de Hoop, PhD, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Neeltje Steeghs, MD, PhD, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Agnes Jager, MD, PhD,
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sanchez-Spitman A, Swen J, Dezentje V, Moes D, Gelderblom H, Guchelaar H. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of tamoxifen and endoxifen. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2019; 12:523-536. [DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2019.1610390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A.B. Sanchez-Spitman
- Leiden Network for Personalised Therapeutics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J.J. Swen
- Leiden Network for Personalised Therapeutics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - V.O. Dezentje
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D.J.A.R. Moes
- Leiden Network for Personalised Therapeutics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - H. Gelderblom
- Leiden Network for Personalised Therapeutics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - H.J. Guchelaar
- Leiden Network for Personalised Therapeutics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
CYP2D6 as a treatment decision aid for ER-positive non-metastatic breast cancer patients: a systematic review with accompanying clinical practice guidelines. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 173:521-532. [PMID: 30411242 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-5027-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2018] [Accepted: 10/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Tamoxifen is one of the principal treatments for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Unfortunately, between 30 and 50% of patients receiving this hormonal therapy relapse. Since CYP2D6 genetic variants have been reported to play an important role in survival outcomes after treatment with tamoxifen, this study sought to summarize and critically appraise the available scientific evidence on this topic. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies investigating associations between CYP2D6 genetic variation and survival outcomes after tamoxifen treatment. Critical appraisal of the retrieved scientific evidence was performed, and recommendations were developed for CYP2D6 genetic testing in the context of tamoxifen therapy. RESULTS Although conflicting literature exists, the majority of the current evidence points toward CYP2D6 genetic variation affecting survival outcomes after tamoxifen treatment. Of note, review of the CYP2D6 genotyping assays used in each of the studies revealed the importance of comprehensive genotyping strategies to accurately predict CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Critical appraisal of the literature provided evidence for the value of comprehensive CYP2D6 genotyping panels in guiding treatment decisions for non-metastatic ER-positive breast cancer patients. Based on this information, it is recommended that alternatives to standard tamoxifen treatments may be considered in CYP2D6 poor or intermediate metabolizers.
Collapse
|