1
|
Kelley Jones C, Scott S, Pashayan N, Morris S, Okan Y, Waller J. Risk-Adapted Breast Screening for Women at Low Predicted Risk of Breast Cancer: An Online Discrete Choice Experiment. Med Decis Making 2024; 44:586-600. [PMID: 38828503 PMCID: PMC11283735 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x241254828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A risk-stratified breast screening program could offer low-risk women less screening than is currently offered by the National Health Service. The acceptability of this approach may be enhanced if it corresponds to UK women's screening preferences and values. OBJECTIVES To elicit and quantify preferences for low-risk screening options. METHODS Women aged 40 to 70 y with no history of breast cancer took part in an online discrete choice experiment. We generated 32 hypothetical low-risk screening programs defined by 5 attributes (start age, end age, screening interval, risk of dying from breast cancer, and risk of overdiagnosis), the levels of which were systematically varied between the programs. Respondents were presented with 8 choice sets and asked to choose between 2 screening alternatives or no screening. Preference data were analyzed using conditional logit regression models. The relative importance of attributes and the mean predicted probability of choosing each program were estimated. RESULTS Participants (N = 502) preferred all screening programs over no screening. An older starting age of screening, younger end age of screening, longer intervals between screening, and increased risk of dying had a negative impact on support for screening programs (P < 0.01). Although the risk of overdiagnosis was of low relative importance, a decreased risk of this harm had a small positive impact on screening choices. The mean predicted probabilities that risk-adapted screening programs would be supported relative to current guidelines were low (range, 0.18 to 0.52). CONCLUSIONS A deintensified screening pathway for women at low risk of breast cancer, especially one that recommends a later screening start age, would run counter to women's breast screening preferences. Further research is needed to enhance the acceptability of offering less screening to those at low risk of breast cancer. HIGHLIGHTS Risk-based breast screening may involve the deintensification of screening for women at low risk of breast cancer.Low-risk screening pathways run counter to women's screening preferences and values.Longer screening intervals may be preferable to a later start age.Work is needed to enhance the acceptability of a low-risk screening pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Suzanne Scott
- Professor of Health Psychology, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - Nora Pashayan
- Professor of Applied Cancer Research, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stephen Morris
- Rand Professor of Health Services Research, Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Yasmina Okan
- Department of Communication, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
- Centre for Decision Research, Leeds University Business School, Leeds, UK
| | - Jo Waller
- Professor of Cancer Behavioural Science, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fransen MP, Damman OC, Bas S, Uiters E, Timmermans DR. Decision-making in breast cancer screening: A qualitative exploration of the match between women's beliefs and screening information in the Netherlands. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 122:108155. [PMID: 38325207 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Decision-making about breast cancer screening requires balanced and understandable information that takes prior beliefs of screening invitees into account. METHODS In qualitative interviews with 22 Dutch women who were invited for screening for the first time (49-52 years of age, varying health literacy levels), we gained insight in their beliefs on breast cancer and breast cancer screening, and explored how the current screening information matched these beliefs. RESULTS Breast cancer was perceived as an unpredictable, severe, and uncontrollable disease. Women considered screening as self-evident and an important mean to gain some control over breast cancer. Information on benefits of screening was in line with women's prior beliefs and confirmed women's main reasons to participate. Information about false-positive outcomes, overtreatment, and false negative outcomes did not correspond to women's prior beliefs and this information was generally not considered relevant for decision-making. Preferences for additional information merely concerned practical information on the screening procedure. CONCLUSION Complex information on the harms of screening does not match women's beliefs and is not taken into account in their decision-making. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Information regarding breast cancer screening could be further aligned to prior beliefs by taking into account values, filling knowledge gaps and correct misconceptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam P Fransen
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Prevention, Lifestyle and Health, Bilthoven, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Olga C Damman
- Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Van der Boechorststraat 7 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sharell Bas
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Prevention, Lifestyle and Health, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen Uiters
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Prevention, Lifestyle and Health, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle Rm Timmermans
- Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Van der Boechorststraat 7 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Laza C, Niño de Guzmán E, Gea M, Plazas M, Posso M, Rué M, Castells X, Román M. "For and against" factors influencing participation in personalized breast cancer screening programs: a qualitative systematic review until March 2022. Arch Public Health 2024; 82:23. [PMID: 38389068 PMCID: PMC10882761 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-024-01248-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Personalized breast cancer screening is a novel strategy that estimates individual risk based on age, breast density, family history of breast cancer, personal history of benign breast lesions, and polygenic risk. Its goal is to propose personalized early detection recommendations for women in the target population based on their individual risk. Our aim was to synthesize the factors that influence women's decision to participate in personalized breast cancer screening, from the perspective of women and health care professionals. METHODS Systematic review of qualitative evidence on factors influencing participation in personalized Breast Cancer Screening. We searched in Medline, Web of science, Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO for qualitative and mixed methods studies published up to March 2022. Two reviewers conducted study selection and extracted main findings. We applied the best-fit framework synthesis and adopted the Multilevel influences on the cancer care continuum model for analysis. After organizing initial codes into the seven levels of the selected model, we followed thematic analysis and developed descriptive and analytical themes. We assessed the methodological quality with the Critical Appraisal Skills Program tool. RESULTS We identified 18 studies published between 2017 and 2022, conducted in developed countries. Nine studies were focused on women (n = 478) and in four studies women had participated in a personalized screening program. Nine studies focused in health care professionals (n = 162) and were conducted in primary care and breast cancer screening program settings. Factors influencing women's decision to participate relate to the women themselves, the type of program (personalized breast cancer screening) and perspective of health care professionals. Factors that determined women participation included persistent beliefs and insufficient knowledge about breast cancer and personalized screening, variable psychological reactions, and negative attitudes towards breast cancer risk estimates. Other factors against participation were insufficient health care professionals knowledge on genetics related to breast cancer and personalized screening process. The factors that were favourable included the women's perceived benefits for themselves and the positive impact on health systems. CONCLUSION We identified the main factors influencing women's decisions to participate in personalized breast cancer screening. Factors related to women, were the most relevant negative factors. A future implementation requires improving health literacy for women and health care professionals, as well as raising awareness of the strategy in society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celmira Laza
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
- Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida Fundació Dr. Pifarré (IRBLleida), Lleida, Spain
| | - Ena Niño de Guzmán
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Institut Català d' Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Montserrat Gea
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
- Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida Fundació Dr. Pifarré (IRBLleida), Lleida, Spain
| | - Merideidy Plazas
- Cochrane Associated Center- University Foundation of Health Sciences, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Margarita Posso
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Montserrat Rué
- Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida Fundació Dr. Pifarré (IRBLleida), Lleida, Spain
- Basic Medical Sciences, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Xavier Castells
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Román
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abdi HI, Nagler RH, Fowler EF, Gollust SE. Effects of exposure to media messages about limiting breast cancer screening: A qualitative experimental study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 117:107988. [PMID: 37778162 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Examine how women aged 35-50 respond to messages about limiting cancer screening. METHODS A national sample of women aged 35-50 (n = 983) were randomly assigned to read one of four media vignettes: three provided information about potential harms of mammograms using evidence, norms, or an anecdote strategy, and one provided no such information. Participants listed thoughts they had about the message, and after coding these themes, we tested for associations between the themes evoked, message exposure, and mammogram history. RESULTS Thematic categories included emotions (8 %); behavioral intentions (14 %); and cognitions, attitudes, and beliefs (67 %). Pro-screening attitudes, questioning, and cues to get screened were most prevalent. The anecdote message often elicited pro-screening attitudes, while the evidence message often elicited negative emotions and anger, as well as questioning or skeptical responses. Those with a history of mammograms expressed more pro-screening attitudes and disagreed with the message more often. CONCLUSIONS Media messaging about guideline-supported care, especially when it involves reducing a clinical service that is routine and valued by patients, may evoke counterarguing, skepticism, and other negative responses. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Clinicians should recognize the role of the media in potentially shaping women's attitudes, beliefs, and intentions when it comes to breast cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamdi I Abdi
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
| | - Rebekah H Nagler
- Hubbard School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Minnesota College of Liberal Arts, 206 Church St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Erika Franklin Fowler
- Department of Government, Wesleyan University, 318 High Street, Middletown, CT 06459, USA
| | - Sarah E Gollust
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Miles A, Paschalidi A, Sharma N. The effect of numeric information about the likelihood of receiving a false negative or false positive result on people's attitudes towards colorectal cancer screening using faecal immunochemical testing (FIT). PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 114:107857. [PMID: 37348310 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the impact of numeric risk information about false negative (FN) and false positive (FP) rates in fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) on attitudes towards screening. METHODS 102 people aged 45-55, living in the UK, read 6 hypothetical vignettes presented online about the use of FIT kits to detect colorectal cancer, in which information about FN and FP rates was systematically varied. RESULTS Numeric FN risk information reduced people's interest in screening, perception of screening effectiveness and lowered trust in screening compared to verbal FN information. Verbal FN information reduced perceptions of screening effectiveness and trust compared to no FN information. People with high subjective numeracy reported lower trust in screening following the provision of numeric FN information but numeracy did not moderate any other associations. FP information did not affect attitudes towards FIT testing. CONCLUSION Numeric FN risk information decreased people's perceptions of screening effectiveness and trust in the results of screening. While it influenced people's interest in screening, the effect was small. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Numeric FN information has a small effect on interest in screening and could promote informed decision making without affecting screening uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Miles
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
| | - Alexandra Paschalidi
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK
| | - Navya Sharma
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hofmann B. To Consent or Not to Consent to Screening, That Is the Question. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11070982. [PMID: 37046909 PMCID: PMC10094591 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11070982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
The objective of this article is to address the controversial question of whether consent is relevant for persons invited to participate in screening programs. To do so, it starts by presenting a case where the provided information historically has not been sufficient for obtaining valid informed consent for screening. Then, the article investigates some of the most relevant biases that cast doubt on the potential for satisfying standard criteria for informed consent. This may indicate that both in theory and in practice, it can be difficult to obtain valid consent for screening programs. Such an inference is profoundly worrisome, as invitees to screening programs are healthy individuals most suited to make autonomous decisions. Thus, if consent is not relevant for screening, it may not be relevant for a wide range of other health services. As such, the lack of valid consent in screening raises the question of the relevance of one of the basic ethical principles in healthcare (respect for autonomy), one of the most prominent legal norms in health legislation (informed consent), and one of the most basic tenets of liberal democracies (individual autonomy). Thus, there are good reasons to provide open, transparent, and balanced information and minimize biases in order to ascertain informed consent in screening.
Collapse
|
7
|
Laza-Vásquez C, Martínez-Alonso M, Forné-Izquierdo C, Vilaplana-Mayoral J, Cruz-Esteve I, Sánchez-López I, Reñé-Reñé M, Cazorla-Sánchez C, Hernández-Andreu M, Galindo-Ortego G, Llorens-Gabandé M, Pons-Rodríguez A, Rué M. Feasibility and Acceptability of Personalized Breast Cancer Screening (DECIDO Study): A Single-Arm Proof-of-Concept Trial. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:10426. [PMID: 36012059 PMCID: PMC9407798 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191610426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the acceptability and feasibility of offering risk-based breast cancer screening and its integration into regular clinical practice. A single-arm proof-of-concept trial was conducted with a sample of 387 women aged 40-50 years residing in the city of Lleida (Spain). The study intervention consisted of breast cancer risk estimation, risk communication and screening recommendations, and a follow-up. A polygenic risk score with 83 single nucleotide polymorphisms was used to update the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium risk model and estimate the 5-year absolute risk of breast cancer. The women expressed a positive attitude towards varying the frequency of breast screening according to individual risk and, especially, more frequently inviting women at higher-than-average risk. A lower intensity screening for women at lower risk was not as welcome, although half of the participants would accept it. Knowledge of the benefits and harms of breast screening was low, especially with regard to false positives and overdiagnosis. The women expressed a high understanding of individual risk and screening recommendations. The participants' intention to participate in risk-based screening and satisfaction at 1-year were very high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celmira Laza-Vásquez
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy and Health Care Research Group (GRECS), IRBLleida—Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida, University of Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain
| | - Montserrat Martínez-Alonso
- IRBLleida—Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain
| | - Carles Forné-Izquierdo
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain
- Heorfy Consulting, 25007 Lleida, Spain
| | - Jordi Vilaplana-Mayoral
- Department of Computing and Industrial Engineering, University of Lleida, 25001 Lleida, Spain
| | - Inés Cruz-Esteve
- Primer de Maig Basic Health Area, Catalan Institute of Health, 25003 Lleida, Spain
| | | | - Mercè Reñé-Reñé
- Department of Radiology, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, 25198 Lleida, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Anna Pons-Rodríguez
- Example Basic Health Area, Catalan Institute of Health, 25006 Lleida, Spain
- Health PhD Program, University of Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain
| | - Montserrat Rué
- IRBLleida—Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pickles K, Hersch J, Nickel B, Vaidya JS, McCaffery K, Barratt A. Effects of awareness of breast cancer overdiagnosis among women with screen-detected or incidentally found breast cancer: a qualitative interview study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061211. [PMID: 35676016 PMCID: PMC9185559 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore experiences of women who identified themselves as having a possible breast cancer overdiagnosis. DESIGN Qualitative interview study using key components of a grounded theory analysis. SETTING International interviews with women diagnosed with breast cancer and aware of the concept of overdiagnosis. PARTICIPANTS Twelve women aged 48-77 years from the UK (6), USA (4), Canada (1) and Australia (1) who had breast cancer (ductal carcinoma in situ n=9, (invasive) breast cancer n=3) diagnosed between 2004 and 2019, and who were aware of the possibility of overdiagnosis. Participants were recruited via online blogs and professional clinical networks. RESULTS Most women (10/12) became aware of overdiagnosis after their own diagnosis. All were concerned about the possibility of overdiagnosis or overtreatment or both. Finding out about overdiagnosis/overtreatment had negative psychosocial impacts on women's sense of self, quality of interactions with medical professionals, and for some, had triggered deep remorse about past decisions and actions. Many were uncomfortable with being treated as a cancer patient when they did not feel 'diseased'. For most, the recommended treatments seemed excessive compared with the diagnosis given. Most found that their initial clinical teams were not forthcoming about the possibility of overdiagnosis and overtreatment, and many found it difficult to deal with their set management protocols. CONCLUSION The experiences of this small and unusual group of women provide rare insight into the profound negative impact of finding out about overdiagnosis after breast cancer diagnosis. Previous studies have found that women valued information about overdiagnosis before screening and this knowledge did not reduce subsequent screening uptake. Policymakers and clinicians should recognise the diversity of women's perspectives and ensure that women are adequately informed of the possibility of overdiagnosis before screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen Pickles
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jolyn Hersch
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Brooke Nickel
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jayant S Vaidya
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexandra Barratt
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ritchie D, Van Hal G, Van den Broucke S. Factors affecting intention to screen after being informed of benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: a study in 5 European countries in 2021. Arch Public Health 2022; 80:143. [PMID: 35599312 PMCID: PMC9125943 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-022-00902-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Participation in mammography screening comes with harms alongside benefits. Information about screening provided to women should convey this information yet concerns persist about its effect on participation. This study addressed factors that may influence the intention to screen once a woman has been informed about benefits and harms of participation. METHODS A cross-sectional survey of women from five countries (Belgium, France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom) was performed in January 2021. The survey contained a statement regarding the benefits and harms of mammography screening along with items to measure cognitive variables from the theory of planned behaviour and health belief model and the 6-item version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q6). Logistic regression and mediation analysis were performed to investigate the effect of cognitive and sociodemographic variables. RESULTS A total of 1180 participants responded to the survey. 19.5% of participants (n = 230) were able to correctly identify that mammography screening carries both benefits and harms. 56.9% of participants (n = 672) responded that they would be more likely to participate in screening in the future after being informed about the benefits and harms of mammography screening. Perceived behavioural control and social norms demonstrated were significant in predicting intention, whereas, the effect of health literacy was limited. CONCLUSIONS Informing women about the presence of benefits and harms of in mammography screening participation did not negatively impact upon intention to be screened. Information should also address perception on implementation factors alongside messages on benefits and harms. Overall, screening programme managers should not be discouraged by the assumption of decreased participation through increasing efforts to address the lack of knowledge on benefits and harms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Ritchie
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
| | - Guido Van Hal
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tsuruda KM, Veierød MB, Houssami N, Waade GG, Mangerud G, Hofvind S. Women's conceptual knowledge about breast cancer screening and overdiagnosis in Norway: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e052121. [PMID: 34907059 PMCID: PMC8671979 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate conceptual knowledge about mammographic screening among Norwegian women. DESIGN We administered a cross-sectional, web-based survey. We used multiple-choice questions and a grading rubric published by a research group from Australia. SETTING Our Norwegian-language survey was open from April to June 2020 and targeted women aged 45-74 years. PARTICIPANTS 2033 women completed our questionnaire. We excluded 13 women outside the target age range and 128 women with incomplete data. Responses from 1892 women were included in the final study sample. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES The questionnaire focused on women's knowledge about the breast cancer mortality reduction, false positive results and overdiagnosis associated with mammographic screening. The primary outcome was the mean number of marks assigned in each of the three themes and overall. There were three potential marks for questions about breast cancer mortality, one for false positives and six for overdiagnosis. RESULTS Most women (91.7%) correctly reported that screened women are less likely to die of breast cancer than non-screened women. 39.7% of women reported having heard of a 'false positive screening result' and 86.2% identified the term's definition; 51.3% of women had heard of 'overdiagnosis' and 14.8% identified the term's definition. The mean score was 2.59 of 3 for questions about breast cancer mortality benefit and 0.93 of 1 for the question about false positive screening results. It was 2.23 of 6 for questions about overdiagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Most participants correctly answered questions about the breast cancer mortality benefit and false positive results associated with screening. The proportion of correct responses to questions about overdiagnosis was modest, indicating that conceptual knowledge about overdiagnosis was lower. Qualitative studies that can obtain in-depth information about women's understanding of overdiagnosis may help improve Norwegian-language information about this challenging topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlyn M Tsuruda
- Department of Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Biostatistics, Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marit B Veierød
- Department of Biostatistics, Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nehmat Houssami
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gunvor G Waade
- Department of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gunhild Mangerud
- Department of Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Solveig Hofvind
- Department of Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cadet T, Aliberti G, Karamourtopoulos M, Jacobson A, Gilliam EA, Primeau S, Davis R, Schonberg MA. Evaluation of a mammography decision aid for women 75 and older at risk for lower health literacy in a pretest-posttest trial. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:2344-2350. [PMID: 33637391 PMCID: PMC8364563 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2020] [Revised: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The evaluation of the effect of a mammography decision aid (DA) designed for older women at risk for lower health literacy (LHL) on their knowledge of mammography's benefits and harms and decisional conflict. METHODS Using a pretest-posttest design, women > 75 years at risk for LHL reviewing a mammography DA before and after their [B] primary care provider visit. Women were recruited from an academic medical center and community health centers and clinics. RESULTS Of 147 eligible women approached, 43 participated. Receipt of the DA significantly affected knowledge of mammography's benefits and harms [B] (pre-test (M = 3.75, SD = 1.05) to post-test (M = 4.42, SD = 1.19), p = .03). Receipt of the DA did not significantly affect decisional conflict (pre-test (M = 3.10, SD = .97) to post-test (M = 3.23, SD = 1.02), p = .71, higher scores = lower decisional conflict). The majority of the women (97%) indicated that the DA was helpful. CONCLUSIONS Women found a mammography screening DA helpful and its use was associated with these women having increased knowledge of mammography's benefits and harms. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS With the shift toward shared decision-making for women > 75 years, there is a need to engage women of all literacy levels to participate in these decisions and have tools such as the one tested in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Cadet
- Simmons University College of Social Sciences and Policy Practice, School of Social Work, 300 The Fenway, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Gianna Aliberti
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 1309 Beacon St, Ste 202, Brookline, MA, USA
| | | | - Alicia Jacobson
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 1309 Beacon St, Ste 202, Brookline, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Gilliam
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 1309 Beacon St, Ste 202, Brookline, MA, USA
| | - Sara Primeau
- Cambridge Health Alliance, 1493 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Roger Davis
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 1309 Beacon St, Ste 202, Brookline, MA, USA
| | - Mara A Schonberg
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 1309 Beacon St, Ste 202, Brookline, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hsieh HM, Chang WC, Shen CT, Liu Y, Chen FM, Kang YT. Mediation Effect of Health Beliefs in the Relationship Between Health Knowledge and Uptake of Mammography in a National Breast Cancer Screening Program in Taiwan. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2021; 36:832-843. [PMID: 32103458 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01711-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Despite evidence that breast cancer screening effectively diagnoses and treats cancer through early detection, mammography use remains low in Taiwan. We applied the health belief model (HBM) and the knowledge-attitude-behavior (KAB) model as theoretical frameworks to examine factors associated with mammography uptake among women aged 45-69 years in Taiwan. A cross-sectional survey January-July 2018 was conducted of women aged 45-69 years in five southern Taiwan health institutions. Survey questionnaires included demographics, HBM constructs, and health knowledge regarding breast cancer and screening. Multivariable logistic regression models explored the mediation effects of HBM constructs between health knowledge and mammography use. The final analytical sample included 621 women; 67 did not receive mammography and 554 received mammography. When the regression model was adjusted only for demographic factors, women with adequate health knowledge were more likely to undergo mammography (AOR = 2.321, 95%CI = 1.141-3.809); in regression models including health knowledge and HBM constructs, the likelihood effect of health knowledge declined and became insignificant (AOR = 1.711, 95%CI = 0.985-2.972), indicating potential mediation effects between health knowledge and up-to-date mammography use. Overall, based on the HBM and the KAB theoretical framework, our data support that health belief played a substantial mediating role in the association between health knowledge and mammography uptake, in particular perceived barriers and cues to action in the HBM, which were modifying factors of health beliefs. Therefore, to improve mammography uptake, it may be helpful to design educational model-based interventions through tackling those modifiable perceived barriers and enhancing the intensity of external cues to action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui-Min Hsieh
- Department of Public Health, Kaohsiung Medical University, 100 Shih-Chung 1st Road, San-Ming Dist, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan.
- Department of Medical Research, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
- Department of Community Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| | - Wei-Chieh Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Ting Shen
- Department of Family Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yi Liu
- Department of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Fang-Ming Chen
- Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ya-Ting Kang
- Department of Management, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mascara M, Constantinou C. Global Perceptions of Women on Breast Cancer and Barriers to Screening. Curr Oncol Rep 2021; 23:74. [PMID: 33937940 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01069-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Breast cancer (BC) is a public health dilemma across the globe and a leading cause of mortality for women. Approximately 2.1 million newly diagnosed female BC cases occurred in 2018, comprising nearly 1 in 4 cancer cases among women. When BC is recognized in its early stages, successful treatment results can be achieved. Therefore, screening for BC is of paramount significance and routine screening mammography has been shown to be effective in reducing mortality from BC. Despite being considered a global health issue, national screening programmes are offered only in developed countries and BC is still often diagnosed in advanced stages. RECENT FINDINGS Disparities in screening exist not only between different countries but also between local and immigrant populations within a particular country. Low screening is attributed to low public awareness as well as numerous social, psychological, and geographical barriers to screening. This review addresses (a) the differences in BC awareness and screening across the globe, (b) the most important barriers and facilitators to screening, and (c) the potential role of health education programmes to increase BC awareness and promote BC screening programmes with the ultimate goal to achieve earlier stage diagnosis of BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariah Mascara
- Department of Basic and Clinical Sciences, University of Nicosia Medical School, 21 Ilia Papakyriakou, 2414 Engomi, P.O. Box 24005, CY-1700, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Constantina Constantinou
- Department of Basic and Clinical Sciences, University of Nicosia Medical School, 21 Ilia Papakyriakou, 2414 Engomi, P.O. Box 24005, CY-1700, Nicosia, Cyprus.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Woof VG, McWilliams L, Donnelly LS, Howell A, Evans DG, Maxwell AJ, French DP. Introducing a low-risk breast screening pathway into the NHS Breast Screening Programme: Views from healthcare professionals who are delivering risk-stratified screening. WOMEN'S HEALTH (LONDON, ENGLAND) 2021; 17:17455065211009746. [PMID: 33877937 PMCID: PMC8060757 DOI: 10.1177/17455065211009746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Proposals to stratify breast screening by breast cancer risk aim to produce a better balance of benefits to harms. Notably, risk estimation calculated from common risk factors and a polygenic risk score would enable high-risk women to benefit from more frequent screening or preventive medication. This service would also identify low-risk women who experience fewer benefits from attending, as lower grade and in situ cancers may be treated unnecessarily. It may therefore be appropriate for low-risk women to attend screening less. This study aimed to elicit views regarding implementing less frequent screening for low-risk women from healthcare professionals who implement risk-stratified screening. METHODS Healthcare professionals involved in the delivery of risk-stratified breast screening were invited to participate in a focus group within the screening setting in which they work or have a telephone interview. Primary care staff were also invited to provide their perspective. Three focus groups and two telephone interviews were conducted with 28 healthcare professionals. To identify patterns across the sample, data were analysed as a single dataset using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS Analysis yielded three themes: Reservations concerning the introduction of less frequent screening, highlighting healthcare professionals' unease and concerns towards implementing less frequent screening; Considerations for the management of public knowledge, providing views on media impact on public opinion and the potential for a low-risk pathway to cause confusion and raise suspicion regarding implementation motives; and Deliberating service implications and reconfiguration management, where the practicalities of implementation are discussed. CONCLUSIONS Healthcare professionals broadly supported less frequent screening but had concerns about implementation. It will be essential to address concerns regarding risk estimate accuracy, healthcare professional confidence, service infrastructure and public communication prior to introducing less frequent screening for low-risk women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria G Woof
- Manchester Centre for Health
Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences,
Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, MAHSC,
Manchester, UK
| | - Lorna McWilliams
- Manchester Centre for Health
Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences,
Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, MAHSC,
Manchester, UK
| | - Louise S Donnelly
- Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer
Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety
Translational Research Centre, Centre for Mental Health and Safety, School of Health
Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, MAHSC,
Manchester, UK
| | - Anthony Howell
- Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer
Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer
Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Department of Genomic Medicine,
Division of Evolution and Genomic Science, University of Manchester, MAHSC,
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Anthony J Maxwell
- Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer
Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Informatics, Imaging &
Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health,
University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - David P French
- Manchester Centre for Health
Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences,
Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, MAHSC,
Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fadda M, Chappuis PO, Katapodi MC, Pagani O, Monnerat C, Membrez V, Unger S, Caiata Zufferey M. Physicians communicating with women at genetic risk of breast and ovarian cancer: Are we in the middle of the ford between contradictory messages and unshared decision making? PLoS One 2020; 15:e0240054. [PMID: 33031463 PMCID: PMC7544052 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BRCA1/2 genetic testing offers tremendous opportunities for prevention, diagnosis and treatment of breast and ovarian cancer. Women acquire valuable information that can help them to make informed decisions about their health. However, knowing one's susceptibility to developing cancer may be burdensome for several women, as this risk needs to be managed over time through a continuous dialogue with multiple healthcare professionals. We explored how communication between physicians and unaffected women carrying BRCA1/2 germline pathogenic variants was experienced by women in relation to their genetic risk. Data came from qualitative interviews conducted in Switzerland with 32 unaffected women carrying BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants and aware of their genetic status for at least 3 years. We identified three different types of message as conveyed by physicians to women: (1) a normative message, (2) an over-empowering message, and (3) a minimizing message. On one hand, we found that women are exposed to contradictory messages, often simultaneously, in their interactions with healthcare professionals during their post-genetic testing journey. On the other hand, women's reports highlighted the absence of shared decision-making in such interactions. The combination of these two findings resulted in a strong sense of disorientation, frustration, and powerlessness among participants. Healthcare professionals interacting with high cancer risk women are urged to align in favor of a both concerted and shared decision-making approach when discussing options for managing genetic risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Fadda
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Università della Svizzera italiana, Italiana, Switzerland
| | - Pierre O. Chappuis
- Division of Genetic Medicine and Division of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Maria C. Katapodi
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Véronique Membrez
- Division of Medical Genetics, Hôpital du Valais, Institut Central (ICH), Sion, Switzerland
| | - Sheila Unger
- Service of Medical Genetics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Austin JD, Shelton RC, Lee Argov EJ, Tehranifar P. Older Women’s Perspectives Driving Mammography Screening Use and Overuse: a Narrative Review of Mixed-Methods Studies. CURR EPIDEMIOL REP 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40471-020-00244-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of Review
Examining what older women know and perceive about mammography screening is critical for understanding patterns of under- and overuse, and concordance with screening mammography guidelines in the USA. This narrative review synthesizes qualitative and quantitative evidence around older women’s perspectives toward mammography screening.
Recent Findings
The majority of 43 identified studies focused on promoting mammography screening in women of different ages, with only four studies focusing on the overuse of mammography in women ≥ 70 years old. Older women hold positive attitudes around screening, perceive breast cancer as serious, believe the benefits outweigh the barriers, and are worried about undergoing treatment if diagnosed. Older women have limited knowledge of screening guidelines and potential harms of screening.
Summary
Efforts to address inequities in mammography access and underuse need to be supplemented by epidemiologic and interventional studies using mixed-methods approaches to improve awareness of benefits and harms of mammography screening in older racially and ethnically diverse women. As uncertainty around how best to approach mammography screening in older women remains, understanding women’s perspectives along with healthcare provider and system-level factors is critical for ensuring appropriate and equitable mammography screening use in older women.
Collapse
|
17
|
Ritchie D, Van Hal G, Van den Broucke S. How is informed decision-making about breast cancer screening addressed in Europe? An international survey of 28 countries. Health Policy 2020; 124:1017-1031. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
18
|
Seaman K, Dzidic PL, Castell E, Saunders C, Breen LJ. Subject positions in screening mammography and implications for informed choice. Psychol Health 2020; 36:478-495. [PMID: 32404016 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2020.1766043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Screening mammography has potential benefits as well as harms, but these are not always communicated to women. We therefore explored how women discuss screening mammography, the subject positions made available in their discourse, and the implications of these for informed choice. Design: We conducted 16 individual interviews with women aged 44-72 years who were attenders (n = 11) and non-attenders (n = 5) of screening, and analysed transcripts through Foucauldian Discourse Analysis. Main Outcome Measures: A semi-structured interview guide, informed by literature and researcher expertise, was used to collect data. Results: The women constructed screening mammography as either helpful or potentially harmful. We identified three subject positions-The Responsible Woman (who attends screening), The Irresponsible Woman (who does not attend screening), and the Judicious Woman (who engages in alternate breast health practices). Conclusion: These subject positions have the potential to limit women's choices, constrain shared decision-making with health professionals, and restrict women's engagement in risk-reducing behaviours. An expanded range of options ultimately offers an alternate future in which women's autonomy to control their own bodies is better supported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen Seaman
- School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Peta L Dzidic
- School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Emily Castell
- School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Christobel Saunders
- School of Medicine, Division of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Lauren J Breen
- School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cancer screening in New Zealand. J Cancer Policy 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2019.100203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
20
|
Bovbjerg ML, Pillai S. Current Resources for Evidence-Based Practice, September 2019. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2019; 48:568-582. [PMID: 31442383 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2019.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
21
|
Lippey J, Keogh LA, Mann GB, Campbell IG, Forrest LE. "A Natural Progression": Australian Women's Attitudes About an Individualized Breast Screening Model. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2019; 12:383-390. [PMID: 31003994 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-18-0443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2018] [Revised: 03/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Individualized screening is our logical next step to improve population breast cancer screening in Australia. To explore breast screening participants' views of the current program in Victoria, Australia, examine their openness to change, and attitudes toward an individualized screening model, this qualitative work was performed from a population-based breast screening cohort. This work was designed to inform the development of a decision aid to facilitate women's decisions about participating in individualized screening, and to elicit Australian consumer perspectives on the international movement toward individualized breast screening. A total of 52 women participated in one of four focus groups, and were experienced with screening with 90% of participants having had more than three mammograms. Focus group discussion was facilitated following three main themes: (i) experience of breast screening; (ii) breast cancer risk perception, and (iii) views on individualized screening. Participants had strong, positive, emotional ties to breast screening in its current structure but were supportive, with some reservations, of the idea of individualized screening. There was good understanding about the factors contributing to personalized risk and a wide range of opinions about the inclusion of genetic testing with genetic testing being considered a foreign and evolving domain. Individualized breast screening that takes account of risk factors such as mammographic density, lifestyle, and genetic factors would be acceptable to a population of women who are invested in the current system. The communication and implementation of a new program would be critical to its acceptance and potential success. Reservations may be had in regards to uptake of genetic testing, motivations behind the change, and management of the women allocated to a lower risk category.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jocelyn Lippey
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. .,St. Vincent's Hospital, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louise A Keogh
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia
| | - G Bruce Mann
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ian G Campbell
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Laura E Forrest
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Systematic Mapping of Scientific Production on Open Innovation (2015–2018): Opportunities for Sustainable Training Environments. SUSTAINABILITY 2019. [DOI: 10.3390/su11061781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Open innovation presents data that may be of value for future research and empirical studies in sustainable training environments. This paper aims to analyze the evidence published in the last three years (2015–2018) regarding open innovation, in order to identify the publications on the subject that may contribute to other studies or practical experiences. The systematic mapping method was used, reviewing 104 articles published from January 2015 to September 2018, which included studies on open innovation that were published in two databases—Web of Science (WOS) and Scopus. Inclusion, exclusion and quality criteria were applied in order to obtain the most relevant information. Findings show the type of methodology used, the most cited articles, the journals where they were published, the geographical distribution of the authors, the area of influence, contexts of application and the topics addressed. This paper provides value to assess progress, identify challenges and contexts of less influence, as well as to establish a database of scientific studies as support for future research.
Collapse
|
23
|
Licochalcone A Inhibits Cellular Motility by Suppressing E-cadherin and MAPK Signaling in Breast Cancer. Cells 2019; 8:cells8030218. [PMID: 30841634 PMCID: PMC6468539 DOI: 10.3390/cells8030218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Revised: 02/16/2019] [Accepted: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
A compound isolated from Glycyrrhiza uralensis, licochalcone A (LA) exhibits anti-inflammatory and anti-tumor properties in various cell lines. LA has been found to promote autophagy and suppress specificity protein 1, inducing apoptosis in breast cancer cells. However, the regulation of breast cancer cell invasion and migration by LA is elusive. Thus, the present study investigated whether LA induces apoptosis and cellular motility in MDA-MB-231 breast cells, and investigated the underlying molecular mechanisms. MDA-MB-231 cells treated with LA and cell viability measured by cell counting kit-8 assay. Apoptotic signal proteins checked by flow cytometry, fluorescent staining, and Western blot. LA effectively suppressed cell migration, and modulated E-cadherin and vimentin expression by blocking MAPK and AKT signaling. LA inhibited cell proliferation and cell cycle, modulated mitochondrial membrane potential and DNA damage, and reduced oxidative stress in MDA-MB-231 cells. LA also activated cleaved-caspase 3 and 9, significantly decreased Bcl-2 expression, ultimately causing the release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria into the cytoplasm. Overall, our findings suggest that LA decreases cell proliferation and increases reactive oxygen species production for induced apoptosis, and regulates E-cadherin and vimentin by reducing MAPK and AKT signaling, resulting in suppressed MDA-MB-231 cell migration and invasion.
Collapse
|