Effects of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors on the risk of acute coronary syndrome in elderly breast cancer patients: An analysis of nationwide data

Development of cardiometabolic risk factors following endocrine therapy in women with breast cancer

PURPOSE

Studies comparing the effect of aromatase inhibitor (AI) and tamoxifen use on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC) survivors report conflicting results. We examined associations of endocrine therapy use with incident diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension.

METHODS

The Pathways Heart Study examines cancer treatment exposures with CVD-related outcomes in Kaiser Permanente Northern California members with BC. Electronic health records provided sociodemographic and health characteristics, BC treatment, and CVD risk factor data. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of incident diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension in hormone receptor-positive BC survivors using AIs or tamoxifen compared with survivors not using endocrine therapy were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for known confounders.

RESULTS

In 8985 BC survivors, mean baseline age and follow-up time was 63.3 and 7.8 years, respectively; 83.6% were postmenopausal. By treatment, 77.0% used AIs, 19.6% used tamoxifen, and 16.0% used neither. Postmenopausal women who used tamoxifen had an increased rate (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.06-1.92) of developing hypertension relative to those who did not use endocrine therapy. Tamoxifen use was not associated with incident diabetes, dyslipidemia, or hypertension in premenopausal BC survivors. Postmenopausal AI users had higher hazard rates of developing diabetes (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.05-1.80), dyslipidemia (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.29-1.92), and hypertension (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.24-1.82) compared with non-endocrine therapy users.

CONCLUSION

Hormone receptor-positive BC survivors treated with AIs may have higher rates of developing diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension over an average 7.8 years post-diagnosis.

Development of cardiometabolic risk factors following endocrine therapy in women with breast cancer

PURPOSE

Studies comparing the effect of aromatase inhibitor (AI) and tamoxifen use on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in hormone-receptor positive breast cancer (BC) survivors report conflicting results. We examined associations of endocrine therapy use with incident diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension.

METHODS

The Pathways Heart Study examines cancer treatment exposures with CVD-related outcomes in Kaiser Permanente Northern California members with BC. Electronic health records provided sociodemographic and health characteristics, BC treatment, and CVD risk factor data. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of incident diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension in hormone-receptor positive BC survivors using AIs or tamoxifen compared with survivors not using endocrine therapy were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for known confounders.

RESULTS

In 8,985 BC survivors, mean baseline age and follow-up time was 63.3 and 7.8 years, respectively; 83.6% were postmenopausal. By treatment, 77.0% used AIs, 19.6% used tamoxifen, and 16.0% used neither. Postmenopausal women who used tamoxifen had an increased rate (HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.06-1.92) of developing hypertension relative to those who did not use endocrine therapy. Tamoxifen use was not associated with incident diabetes, dyslipidemia, or hypertension in premenopausal BC survivors. Postmenopausal AI users had higher hazard rates of developing diabetes (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.05-1.80), dyslipidemia (HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.29-1.92) and hypertension (HR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.24-1.82) compared with non-endocrine therapy users.

CONCLUSION

Hormone-receptor positive BC survivors treated with AIs may have higher rates of developing diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension over an average 7.8 years post-diagnosis.

Risk of Cardiovascular Events and Lipid Profile Change in Patients with Breast Cancer Taking Aromatase Inhibitor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the most common comorbidities in breast cancer survivors. Recently, the target population and treatment period for aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment in breast cancer patients has been expanding. However, information on adverse CVD events from the long-term use of AI is still lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the CVD side effects of AI treatment and to evaluate the changes in lipid profile during AI treatment. A systematic search of PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases reporting on cardiovascular outcomes or lipid profiles change in adult female breast cancer patients (>19 years old) with AI was performed. The pooled analysis of 25 studies showed that the prevalence rate of any type of cardiovascular disease was 6.08 per 100 persons (95% CI 2.91-10.31). Angina was the most common type of heart-related cardiovascular event accounting for 3.85 per 100 persons, followed by any type of stroke (3.34) and venous thromboembolism (2.95). Ischemic stroke (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.07-1.81) and myocardial infarction (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.88-1.93) were more common in AI compared with tamoxifen, whereas the prevalence of venous thromboembolism (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-1) was significantly lower in the AI group. In addition, treatment with AI for 6-12 months showed a decrease in HDL-cholesterol and an increase in LDL-cholesterol and total cholesterol. Various CVDs can occur when using AI, and in particular, the risk of MI and ischemic stroke increases in comparison with the adverse effect of tamoxifen. The occurrence of CVD might be related to the deterioration of the lipid profile after AI treatment. Therefore, a customized individualization strategy considering each patient's CV risk factors is needed during AI treatment.

Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Women With and Without Breast Cancer: The Pathways Heart Study

PURPOSE

To examine cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality risk in women with breast cancer (BC) by cancer therapy received relative to women without BC.

METHODS

The study population comprised Kaiser Permanente Northern California members. Cases with invasive BC diagnosed from 2005 to 2013 were matched 1:5 to controls without BC on birth year and race/ethnicity. Cancer treatment, CVD outcomes, and covariate data were from electronic health records. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of CVD incidence and mortality by receipt of chemotherapy treatment combinations, radiation therapy, and endocrine therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 13,642 women with BC were matched to 68,202 controls without BC. Over a 7-year average follow-up (range < 1-14 years), women who received anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab had high risk of heart failure/cardiomyopathy relative to controls, with the highest risk seen in women who received both anthracyclines and trastuzumab (HR, 3.68; 95% CI, 1.79 to 7.59). High risk of heart failure and/or cardiomyopathy was also observed in women with BC with a history of radiation therapy (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.69) and aromatase inhibitor use (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.60), relative to their controls. Elevated risks for stroke, arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, venous thromboembolic disease, CVD-related death, and death from any cause were also observed in women with BC on the basis of cancer treatment received.

CONCLUSION

Women with BC had increased incidence of CVD events, CVD-related mortality, and all-cause mortality compared with women without BC, and risks varied according to the history of cancer treatment received. Studies are needed to determine how women who received BC treatment should be cared for to improve cardiovascular outcomes.

Risks of Aromatase Inhibitor-Related Cardiotoxicity in Patients with Breast Cancer in Asia

Simple Summary

In Asian breast cancer patients, whether the risks of major adverse cardio- and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) are different between users of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) remains uncertain. In this nationwide cohort study, the risks of MACCEs were significantly higher in users of SERMs compared with users of AIs in those who were at an old age (above 50 years old) or with advanced cancer stage (stage 3–4). Although the choice of hormone therapies is primarily based on the effectiveness regarding cancer survival, AI treatment should be considered for patients for whom the benefits outweigh the risks.

Abstract

Background: Despite a preferred endocrine therapy for women with estrogen and progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer, aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been reported to increase risks of cardiovascular events. Given that breast cancer patients in Asia are younger at diagnosis, it is urgent to investigate this safety concern. Methods: Through the Taiwanese National Cohort, we identified breast cancer patients initiating selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) or AIs from 2010 to 2016. Outcomes includes major adverse cardio- and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). The average follow-up duration was five years. Results: We identified 16,730 breast cancer patients treated with SERMs and 11,728 receiving AIs. The population was older and had more comorbidities in the AI group than in the SERM group. After adjusting for age, cancer stage, cancer therapies, cardiovascular drugs and comorbidities, despite similar risks of MACCEs between AI and SERM users, the risk of HF was significantly higher in patients treated with SERMs after adjusted mortality as a competing risk. When divided by the age of 50 years, despite a similar MACCEs in the younger population, MACCEs remained significantly higher in the older population who received SERMs. Conclusions: In this Asian cohort, we found that among patients of old age or with advanced cancer stage, the use of SERMs was associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events than the use of AIs.

Risk of cardiovascular disease in breast cancer patients receiving aromatase inhibitors vs. tamoxifen: A systematic review and meta-analysis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in women worldwide. In order to reduce the risks of its recurrence, endocrine therapies, such as tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors are commonly administered. Despite having a similar efficacy in preventing breast cancer recurrence, these drugs differ in terms of instigating cardiovascular morbidities. Recent randomized controlled trials and cohort studies provide inconclusive evidence of the cardiovascular risks associated with the administration of these endocrine therapies. This present review and meta-analysis evaluates the comparative cardiovascular adverse event outcomes in breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors. To evaluate the comparative cardiovascular adverse outcomes, such as venous thromboembolism, heart failure, angina, myocardial infarction and stroke in patients with breast cancer receiving tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors.

METHODS

A systematic search of the academic literature was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines across five databases, including Web of Science, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, and MEDLINE. A random-effect meta-analysis was conducted to compare the cardiovascular adverse events (i.e. venous thromboembolism, heart failure, angina, myocardial infarction, stroke) in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

From 993 studies, 20 eligible studies were identified, with 174,142 female breast cancer patients (mean age: 67.4 ± 3.8 years). A meta-analysis revealed insignificantly (p > 0.05) higher risks of venous thromboembolism (Odds ratio, 95% CI: 1.70, 0.91-3.18) in patients treated with tamoxifen as compared to aromatase inhibitors. We also observed insignificantly higher risks of stroke (0.93, 0.45-1.91), angina (0.77, 0.12-4.59), myocardial infarction (0.74, 0.30-1.79), and heart failure (0.81, 0.22-2.91) in patients receiving aromatase inhibitors as compared to tamoxifen.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS

The study provides evidence regarding the comparative cardiovascular adverse outcomes between breast cancer patients consuming tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors. The study reports an insignificant increase in the events of stroke, angina, myocardial infarction, and heart failure in breast cancer patients treated with aromatase inhibitors as compared to tamoxifen. The study also reports that tamoxifen treatment is associated with an insignificant increase in the events of venous thromboembolism as compared to treatment with aromatase inhibitors.

Association Between Aromatase Inhibitors and Myocardial Infarction Morbidity in Women With Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

BACKGROUND

The cardiovascular toxicity of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) for women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer is controversial. We aimed to evaluate the association between AIs and the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer based on real-world studies.

METHOD

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify studies that estimated the association between MI risk and AIs. A random-effects model was used to evaluate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the predefined outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 134 476 patients from eight cohort studies were enrolled in our analysis. For MI incidence, no significant difference was found between the users of AIs and non-users (HR: .98, 95% CI: .83-1.17). The subgroup analysis of patients without a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) suggested a reduced risk of MI (HR: .86, 95% CI: .77-.96). No significant difference was found for ischemic stroke (HR: .93, 95% CI: .82-1.07) and heart failure (HR: 1.24, 95% CI: .92-1.66) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Based on real-world data, AIs may be a safe treatment route for patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and those with a history of CVD. AIs caused a major decrease in MI in patients without CVD history. However, more in-depth investigations are needed to explore the association between AI use and the incidence of MI in the treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Increased Risk of Cardiovascular Death in Breast Cancer Patients Without Chemotherapy or (and) Radiotherapy: A Large Population-Based Study

Background

Cardiovascular death (CVD) in breast cancer patients without chemotherapy (CT) or (and) radiotherapy (RT) has not been studied yet. This study evaluates the correlation between breast cancer and CVD risk independent of chemotherapy or (and) radiotherapy.

Methods

Data of female breast cancer patients without receiving CT or RT were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database (2004–2015). Data were divided into two cohorts: tumor resection cohort and no resection cohort. The CVD risk in patients was expressed as standardized mortality ratios (SMRs). A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance inter-group bias, and competing risk regressions were utilized to evaluate the impact of tumor resection on CVD.

Results

The CVD risk was significantly higher (SMR = 2.196, 95% CI: 2.148–2.245, P<0.001) in breast cancer patients who did not receive CT or RT compared to the general population. Breast cancer patients without tumor resection showed higher CVD risk than patients who underwent tumour resection (tumor resection SMR = 2.031, 95% CI: 1.983–2.079, P<0.001; no resection SMR = 5.425, 95% CI: 5.087–5.781, P<0.001). After PSM, the CVD risk among patients without tumor resection indicated an increase of 1.165-fold compared to patients with tumor resection (HR=1.165, 95% CI: 1.039–1.306, P=0.009).

Conclusions

Female breast cancer patients are at higher risk of CVD despite unexposure to cardio-toxic CT or RT. However, female breast cancer patients subjected to tumor resection have decreased CVD risk. These results indicated that monitoring female breast cancer patients not receiving RT or CT might serve as a preventative measure against CVD.