Protease levels are significantly altered in pediatric burn wounds

Downregulation of nutrition sensor GCN2 in macrophages contributes to poor wound healing in diabetes

Poor skin wound healing, which is common in patients with diabetes, is related to imbalanced macrophage polarization. Here, we find that nutrition sensor GCN2 (general control nonderepressible 2) and its downstream are significantly upregulated in human skin wound tissue and mouse skin wound macrophages, but skin wound-related GCN2 expression and activity are significantly downregulated by diabetes and hyperglycemia. Using wound healing models of GCN2-deleted mice, bone marrow chimeric mice, and monocyte-transferred mice, we show that GCN2 deletion in macrophages significantly delays skin wound healing compared with wild-type mice by altering M1 and M2a/M2c polarization. Mechanistically, GCN2 inhibits M1 macrophages via OXPHOS-ROS-NF-κB pathway and promotes tissue-repairing M2a/M2c macrophages through eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2α)-hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF1α)-glycolysis pathway. Importantly, local supplementation of GCN2 activator halofuginone efficiently restores wound healing in diabetic mice with re-balancing M1 and M2a/2c polarization. Thus, the decreased macrophage GCN2 expression and activity contribute to poor wound healing in diabetes and targeting GCN2 improves wound healing in diabetes.

IL-1/MyD88-Dependent G-CSF and IL-6 Secretion Mediates Postburn Anemia

The anemia of critical illness (ACI) is a nearly universal pathophysiological consequence of burn injury and a primary reason burn patients require massive quantities of transfused blood. Inflammatory processes are expected to drive postburn ACI and prevent meaningful erythropoietic stimulation through iron or erythropoietin supplementation, but to this day no specific inflammatory pathways have been identified as a critical mechanism. In this study, we examined whether secretion of G-CSF and IL-6 mediates distinct features of postburn ACI and interrogated inflammatory mechanisms that could be responsible for their secretion. Our analysis of mouse and human skin samples identified the burn wound as a primary source of G-CSF and IL-6 secretion. We show that G-CSF and IL-6 are secreted independently through an IL-1/MyD88-dependent mechanism, and we ruled out TLR2 and TLR4 as critical receptors. Our results indicate that IL-1/MyD88-dependent G-CSF secretion plays a key role in impairing medullary erythropoiesis and IL-6 secretion plays a key role in limiting the access of erythroid cells to iron. Importantly, we found that IL-1α/β neutralizing Abs broadly attenuated features of postburn ACI that could be attributed to G-CSF or IL-6 secretion and rescued deficits of circulating RBC counts, hemoglobin, and hematocrit caused by burn injury. We conclude that wound-based IL-1/MyD88 signaling mediates postburn ACI through induction of G-CSF and IL-6 secretion.

Identification and Verification of Five Potential Biomarkers Related to Skin and Thermal Injury Using Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis

Background: Burn injury is a life-threatening disease that does not have ideal biomarkers. Therefore, this study first applied weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and differentially expressed gene (DEG) screening methods to identify pivotal genes and diagnostic biomarkers associated with the skin burn process.

Methods: After obtaining transcriptomic datasets of burn patient skin and normal skin from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and performing differential analysis and functional enrichment, WGCNA was used to identify hub gene modules associated with burn skin processes in the burn patient peripheral blood sample dataset and determine the correlation between modules and clinical features. Enrichment analysis was performed to identify the functions and pathways of key module genes. Differential analysis, WGCNA, protein-protein interaction analysis, and enrichment analysis were utilized to screen for hub genes. Hub genes were validated in two other GEO datasets, tested by immunohistochemistry for hub gene expression in burn patients, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed. Finally, we constructed the specific drug activity, transcription factors, and microRNA regulatory network of the five hub genes.

Results: A total of 1,373 DEGs in GSE8056 were obtained, and the top 5 upregulated genes were S100A12, CXCL8, CXCL5, MMP3, and MMP1, whereas the top 5 downregulated genes were SCGB1D2, SCGB2A2, DCD, TSPAN8, and KRT25. DEGs were significantly enriched in the immunity, epidermal development, and skin development processes. In WGCNA, the yellow module was identified as the most closely associated module with tissue damage during the burn process, and the five hub genes (ANXA3, MCEMP1, MMP9, S100A12, and TCN1) were identified as the key genes for burn injury status, which consistently showed high expression in burn patient blood samples in the GSE37069 and GSE13902 datasets. Furthermore, we verified using immunohistochemistry that these five novel hub genes were also significantly elevated in burn patient skin. In addition, MCEMP1, MMP9, and S100A12 showed perfect diagnostic performance in the receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Conclusion: In conclusion, we analyzed the changes in genetic processes in the skin during burns and used them to identify five potential novel diagnostic markers in blood samples from burn patients, which are important for burn patient diagnosis. In particular, MCEMP1, MMP9, and S100A12 are three key blood biomarkers that can be used to identify skin damage in burn patients.