Antihypertensive medications and survival in patients with cancer: A population-based retrospective cohort study

Several first-line anti-hypertensives act on fibrosarcoma progression and PD1ab blockade therapy

PURPOSE

Patients are typically diagnosed with both hypertension and fibrosarcoma. Medical oncologists must prescribe suitable anti-hypertensive medications while considering anti-tumor drugs. Recently, immunotherapy has become prominent in cancer treatment. Nonetheless, it is unknown what role anti-hypertensive medications will play in immunotherapy.

METHODS

We examined the effects of six first-line anti-hypertensive medications on programmed cell death protein 1 antibody (PD1ab) in tumor treatment using a mouse model of subcutaneous fibrosarcoma. The drugs examined were verapamil, losartan, furosemide, spironolactone, captopril, and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). The infiltration of CD8+ T cells was examined by immunohistochemistry. Additionally, several in vitro and in vivo assays were used to study the effects of HCTZ on human fibrosarcoma cancer cells to explore its mechanism.

RESULTS

Verapamil suppressed tumor growth and showed an improved effect on the tumor inhibition of PD1ab. Captopril did not affect tumor growth but brought an unexpected benefit to PD1ab treatment. In contrast, spironolactone and furosemide showed no effect on tumor growth but had an offset effect on the PD1ab therapy. Consequently, the survival time of mice was also significantly reduced. Notably, losartan and HCTZ, especially HCTZ, promoted tumor growth and weakened the effect of PD1ab treatment. Consistent results were observed in vivo and in vitro using the human fibrosarcoma cell line HT1080. We determined that the Solute Carrier Family 12 Member 3 (SLC12A3), a known target of HCTZ, may be the principal factor underlying its effect-enhancing properties through mechanism studies employing The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data and in vivo and in vitro assays.

CONCLUSION

Verapamil and captopril potentiated the anti-tumor effect of PD1ab, whereas spironolactone and furosemide weakened the effect of PD1ab on tumor inhibition. Alarmingly, losartan and HCTZ promoted tumor growth and impaired the effect of PD1ab. Furthermore, we preliminarily found that HCTZ may promote tumor progression through SLC12A3. Based on this study, futher mechanism researches and clinical trials should be conducted in the future.

Concomitant antihypertensive medication and outcome of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate

BACKGROUND

The introduction of novel hormonal therapies represented by enzalutamide (ENZ) and abiraterone acetate (ABI) has reached a great progress in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The majority of mCRPC patients are elderly suffering from chronic co-morbidities requiring use of various concomitant medications. In the present study, we focused on impact of concomitant antihypertensive medication on the outcomes of mCRPC patients treated with ENZ or ABI.

METHODS

In total, 300 patients were included and their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) represented the only concomitant medication significantly associated with survival. The median radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients using ACEIs were 15.5 and 32.3 months compared to 10.7 and 24.0 months for those not using ACEIs (p = 0.0053 and p = 0.0238, respectively). Cox multivariable analysis revealed the use of ACEIs a significant predictive factor for both rPFS (HR = 0.704, p = 0.0364) and OS (HR = 0.592, p = 0.0185).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest an association between the concomitant use of ACEIs and longer survival of mCRPC patients receiving ENZ or ABI therapy.

The association between beta-blockers use and prostate cancer mortality: A mini systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Preclinical studies have shown that the sympathetic nervous system is involved in the development of metastases, suggesting a potential antitumor effect of beta-blockers. These findings sparked a controversy over the past decade regarding the direction of the association between beta-blocker use and prostate cancer (PCa) mortality. To investigate this association, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

The review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines to identify eligible studies. The primary outcome was PCa mortality in beta-blocker users versus nonusers, and overall survival was studied as a secondary endpoint. We assessed heterogeneity using the Cochrane Q test and quantified it using I2 values. In the case of heterogeneity (Cochrane Q test p < 0.05 and I2  > 50%), random-effect models were used to determine the association between beta-blockers use and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Ten studies met our inclusion criteria and a total of 74,970 patients were included: 26,674 beta-blocker users and 48,326 nonusers. There was no statistically significant association between beta-blocker exposure and PCa mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-1.09; p = 0.61). However, significant heterogeneity was found. Meta-regression analysis to explain heterogeneity showed no effect of any of the variables assessed (country, percentage of beta-blocker users, type of beta-blocker [selective and nonselective], study period, PCa stage and follow-up duration; all p > 0.05). We found similar results when we restricted the analysis to studies that include only patients with advanced PCa (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.80-1.06; p = 0.24). Similarly, we found no association with overall survival (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.94-1.10; p = 0.64). Meta-regression analysis was also performed, but none of the variables assessed explained the observed heterogeneity (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no association between beta-blockers use and overall survival or PCa mortality. This meta-analysis, which includes a considerable population and the most recent literature, provides important data for routine clinical care and patient counseling.

Increased sympathetic nervous system impairs prognosis in lung cancer patients: a scoping review of clinical studies

Aim

To summarize current knowledge, gaps, quality of the evidence and show main results related to the role of the autonomic nervous system in lung cancer.

Methods

Studies were identified through electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane Library) in October 2023, and a descriptive analysis was performed. Twenty-four studies were included, and most were observational.

Results

Our data indicated an increased expression of β-2-adrenergic receptors in lung cancer, which was associated with poor prognosis. However, the use of β-blockers as an add-on to standard treatment promoted enhanced overall survival, recurrence-free survival and reduced metastasis occurrence.

Conclusion

Although the results herein seem promising, future research using high-quality prospective clinical trials is required to draw directions to guide clinical interventions.

Verapamil modulates NFAT2 to inhibit tumor growth and potentiates PD1ab immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in cervical cancer treatment

PURPOSE

Current evidence suggests a high co-prevalence of hypertension and cervical cancer. Accordingly, blood pressure control is indicated during anti-tumor drug therapy in this patient population. Over the past few years, immunotherapy has made great strides in treating different cancers. However, the role and clinical significance of verapamil as a first-line anti-hypertensive drug during immunotherapy remain poorly understood, emphasizing the need for further studies.

METHODS

Murine cervical cancer models were employed to assess the effect of verapamil monotherapy and combination with PD1ab. Immunohistochemistry was conducted to quantify the abundance of CD8+ T cell and Ki67+ cells. Several in-vitro and in-vivo assays were used to study the effects of verapamil and explore the preliminary mechanism.

RESULTS

Monotherapy with verapamil or PD1ab immune checkpoint inhibitor significantly suppressed the growth of subcutaneously grafted U14 cells in WT BABL/c mice, respectively, with increased survival time of mice. Consistent results were observed in the melanoma model. Furthermore, we substantiated that verapamil significantly impaired tumor proliferation and migration of SiHa human cervical cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. In silico analysis using TCGA data revealed that NFAT2 expression negatively correlated with patient survival. The CCK8 assay revealed that verapamil abrogated the stimulatory effect of NFAT2 after knockdown of NFAT2.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that verapamil inhibits tumor growth by modulating NFAT2 expression and enhancing tumor immune responses to PD1ab, which can be harnessed for cervical cancer therapy, especially for patients with comorbid hypertension. Indeed, further clinical trials are warranted to increase the robustness of our findings.

Impact of Beta Blockers on Breast Cancer Incidence and Prognosis

Several studies have investigated the link between beta blockers (BB) and breast cancer outcomes but have reported mixed results. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between BB and breast cancer outcomes. Literatures investigating the relationship between BB and breast cancer outcomes were searched through PubMed and Embase. A total 43 articles were included by meta-analysis. We found BB increased breast cancer risk (n = 22, RR: 1.169, 95% CI: 1.063-1.285). We also found BB were associated with a lower overall survival (OS, n = 19, RR: 1.125, 95% CI: 1.078-1.173) and a higher recurrence risk (n = 8, RR: 1.130, 95% CI: 1.040-1.227) for breast cancer. Interestingly, subgroup analyses found only selective BB increased breast cancer risk (n = 5, RR: 1.766, 95% CI: 1.148-2.718) and recurrence risk (n = 2, RR: 1.168 -, 95% CI: 1.026-1.328) while only nonselective BB were associated with a lower OS (n = 4, RR: 1.135, 95% CI: 1.073-1.202) for breast cancer. Moreover, we found BB were associated with a significantly lower OS (n = 3, RR: 2.751, 95% CI: 1.213-6.238) and higher recurrence (n = 2, RR: 1.284, 95% CI: 1.102-1.497) only in luminal breast cancer while with a higher PFS (n = 2, RR: 0.585, 95% CI: 0.343-0.997) in Her2+ breast cancer. No significant differences in terms of CSM (n = 19, RR: 1.009, 95% CI: 0.947-1.077), PFS (n = 4, RR: 0.932, 95% CI: 0.616-1.305), and DFS (n = 2, RR: 0.776, 95% CI: 0.512-1.176) were observed. Our results provide evidence of the relationship between BB and breast cancer incidence and prognosis.

Chronic stress in solid tumor development: from mechanisms to interventions

Chronic stress results in disturbances of body hormones through the neuroendocrine system. Cancer patients often experience recurrent anxiety and restlessness during disease progression and treatment, which aggravates disease progression and hinders treatment effects. Recent studies have shown that chronic stress-regulated neuroendocrine systems secret hormones to activate many signaling pathways related to tumor development in tumor cells. The activated neuroendocrine system acts not only on tumor cells but also modulates the survival and metabolic changes of surrounding non-cancerous cells. Current clinical evidences also suggest that chronic stress affects the outcome of cancer treatment. However, in clinic, there is lack of effective treatment for chronic stress in cancer patients. In this review, we discuss the main mechanisms by which chronic stress regulates the tumor microenvironment, including functional regulation of tumor cells by stress hormones (stem cell-like properties, metastasis, angiogenesis, DNA damage accumulation, and apoptotic resistance), metabolic reprogramming and immune escape, and peritumor neuromodulation. Based on the current clinical treatment framework for cancer and chronic stress, we also summarize pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic approaches to provide some directions for cancer therapy.

Drug Repurposing: A New Hope in Drug Discovery for Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer (PCA), the most common cancer in men, accounted for 1.3 million new incidences in 2018. An increase in incidences is an issue of concern that should be addressed. Of all the reported prostate cancers, 85% were detected in stages III and IV, making them difficult to treat. Conventional drugs gradually lose their efficacy due to the developed resistance against them, thus requiring newer therapeutic agents to be used as monotherapy or combination. Recent research regarding treatment options has attained remarkable speed and development. Therefore, in this context, drug repurposing comes into the picture, which is defined as the "investigation of the off-patent, approved and marketed drugs for a novel therapeutic indication" which saves at least 30% of the time and cost, reducing the cost of treatment for patients, which usually runs high in cancer patients. The anticancer property of cardiac glycosides in cancers was tested in the early 1980s. The trend then shifts toward treating prostate cancer by repurposing other cardiovascular drugs. The current review mainly emphasizes the advantageous antiprostate cancer profile of conventional CVS drugs like cardiac glycosides, RAAS inhibitors, statins, heparin, and beta-blockers with underlying mechanisms.

The Risk for Prostate Cancer With Calcium Channel Blockers: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression

BACKGROUND

For decades, conflicting results were published regarding the increased risk of Prostate cancer (PCa) among calcium channel blocker (CCB) users.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the association between PCa and CCB exposure and assess moderating factors.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for observational and randomized studies published until November 2020 with no language limitations, including data on the risk for PCa in CCB users compared with non-CCB users. We applied a random-effects model meta-analysis to pool results. In addition, we investigated potential moderating factors, such as CCB type, study type, participants' age, and duration of exposure, using meta-regression methods.

RESULTS

In our primary analysis, we included 18 studies. A statistically significant 5% increase in the risk for PCa was observed among CCB users (risk ratio [RR] = 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.10), with no significant association between the duration of exposure to CCBs and the risk for PCa (RR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.98-1.19 for exposure for < 5years and RR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.9-1.14 for exposure ≥ 5 years). The association remained statistically significant for the subgroup of dihydropyridines (RR = 1.13; 95% CI: 1.05-1.22). In addition, the association was not influenced by participants' age.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

CCBs are an important modality in treating hypertension. The 5% increased risk observed in the current meta-analysis could be influenced by residual confounding factors and should not affect hypertension treatment guidelines until more studies provide additional clinical information.

Increased risk of metastasis in patients with incidental use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors: a retrospective analysis for multiple types of cancer based on electronic medical records

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors have been shown to prevent cancer metastasis in experimental models, but there are limited data in clinical studies. We aimed to explore whether renin-angiotensin system inhibitors administered during the period of cancer resection can influence the subsequent development of metastasis by analyzing multiple individual types of primary cancers. A total of 4927 patients who had undergone resection of primary cancers at Kyushu University Hospital from 2009 to 2014 were enrolled and categorized into 3 groups based on the use of antihypertensive drugs: renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, other drugs, and none. Cumulative incidence functions of metastasis, treating death as a competing risk, were calculated, and the difference was examined among groups by Gray's test. Fine and Gray's model was employed to evaluate multivariate-adjusted hazards of incidental metastasis. In the multivariate-adjusted analysis, patients with skin and renal cancers showed statistically higher risks of metastasis with the use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 5.81 [1.07-31.57] and 4.24 [1.71-10.53], respectively). Regarding pancreatic cancer, patients treated with antihypertensive drugs other than renin-angiotensin system inhibitors had a significantly increased risk of metastasis (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 3.31 [1.43-7.69]). Future larger studies are needed to ascertain whether renin-angiotensin system inhibitors can increase the risk of metastasis in skin and renal cancers, focusing on specific tissue types and potential factors associated with renin-angiotensin system inhibitor use.

Impact of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on the survival of patients with rectal cancer

Background

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs) are widely used in the treatment of hypertension. However, their impact on the outcome of the combined treatment of rectal cancer is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of RASIs on the survival of rectal cancer patients with associated hypertension after neoadjuvant treatment and radical resection.

Methods

Between 2008 and 2016, 242 radical (R0) rectal resections for cancer were performed after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with associated hypertension. At the time of treatment, 158 patients were on RASIs, including 35 angiotensin-receptor antagonists (ARB) users and 123 angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) users. Eighty-four patients were on drugs other than RASIs (non-RASI users). The survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier estimator with the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

The log-rank test showed a significantly worse overall survival (OS) in the group of ACEI users compared to ARB users (p = 0.009) and non-RASI users (p = 0.013). Disease-free survival (DFS) was better in the group of ARB users compared to ACEI users. However, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.064). The Multivariate Cox analysis showed a significant beneficial effect of ARBs on OS (HR: 0.326, 95% CI: 0.147–0.724, p = 0.006) and ARBs on DFS (HR: 0.339, 95% CI: 0.135–0.850, p = 0.021) compared to ACEIs. Other factors affecting OS included age (HR: 1.044, 95% CI: 1.016–1.073, p = 0.002), regional lymph node metastasis (ypN +) (HR: 2.157, 95% CI: 1.395–3.334, p = 0.001) and perineural invasion (PNI) (HR: 3.864, 95% CI: 1.799–8.301, p = 0.001). Additional factors affecting DFS included ypN + (HR: 2.310, 95% CI: 1.374–3.883, p = 0.002) and PNI (HR: 4.351, 95% CI: 1.584–11.954, p = 0.004).

Conclusions

The use of ARBs instead of ACEIs may improve the outcome of the combined therapy for rectal cancer patients with associated hypertension.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09919-0.

β-blockers and breast cancer survival by molecular subtypes: a population-based cohort study and meta-analysis

Background

The association between use of β-blockers and breast cancer (BC) prognosis has been investigated in several observational studies, with conflicting results. We performed a nationwide cohort study and a meta-analysis to investigate the association, and assess if it varied between molecular subtypes of BC.

Methods

We identified women aged ≥50 years with BC diagnosed between 2004 and 2018 in Norway. We used Cox regression models to estimate the association between β-blocker use at diagnosis and BC-specific survival, overall and by molecular subtype. We performed a meta-analysis of observational studies that reported molecular subtype-specific estimates of this association.

Results

We included 30,060 women, of which 4461 (15%) used β-blockers. After a median follow-up of 5.1 years, 2826 (9%) died of BC. Overall, β-blocker use was not associated with BC-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97–1.19). We found an association only in triple-negative BC (TNBC) patients (HR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.47–0.91). This was confirmed in the meta-analysis: β-blocker use was associated with progression/recurrence-free (HR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.38–0.89) and BC-specific survival (HR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.55–1.00) in TNBC patients only.

Conclusion

In our cohort of BC patients and in the meta-analysis, β-blocker use was associated with prolonged BC-specific survival only in TNBC patients.

Pan-Cancer Characterization of Intratumoral Autonomic Innervation in 32 Cancer Types in the Cancer Genome Atlas

Simple Summary

There have been growing interests in the roles of intratumoral innervation of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) as a mechanism linking psychosocial stress, β-adrenergic signaling pathways, and poor cancer outcomes, and a potential target for therapeutic purpose. Our current knowledge is being limited by the few cancer types where intratumoral ANS have been studied; it remains to be determined the extent of this mechanism existing in different cancer types. Our study provided the first pan-cancer characterization of intratumoral innervation across 32 cancer types, and further, their relationships with tumor histopathological and molecular characteristics and survival outcomes. We found wide variations in intratumoral ANS expression both within and across cancer types. The association of ANS signatures with tumor histopathological characteristics and survival outcomes also varied by cancer type. Our findings suggest that the potential benefits of cancer therapies targeting β-adrenergic receptor-mediated stress signaling pathways are likely dependent on cancer type.

Abstract

Over the past two decades, multiple studies have demonstrated the important role that the autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays in tumorigenesis and cancer progression. However, the mechanisms by which this process occurs have only recently begun to be elucidated. Further, the extent of autonomic innervation in various cancer types and its effects on tumor molecular, immunological, and histopathological features, as well as on patient outcomes, are not yet fully characterized. In this study, we analyzed intratumoral ANS gene expression signatures, including overall intratumoral neuron growth and sympathetic and parasympathetic markers, across 32 cancer types using tumor transcriptomic and clinical annotation data available from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Our analysis revealed wide variations in intratumoral ANS expression both within and across cancer types. The association of ANS signatures with tumor histopathological characteristics and survival outcomes also varied by cancer type. We found intratumoral ANS expression to be commonly correlated with angiogenesis, TGF-β signaling, and immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment of many cancer types, which provide mechanistic insights into the involvement of intratumoral innervation in cancer development and progression. Our findings suggest that the potential benefits of cancer therapies targeting β-adrenergic receptor-mediated stress signaling pathways are likely dependent on cancer type.

The use of renin angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors may be associated with decreased mortality after cancer surgery

Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors are antihypertensive agents with conflicting results on protective effects against some types of cancer. In light of these controversies, we aimed to study the effects of RAAS inhibitors in patients undergoing cancer surgery. From March 2010 to December 2019, consecutive adult patients with antihypertensive drug prescription at discharge after cancer surgery were enrolled and divided into two groups according to RAAS inhibitors prescription. The primary outcome was 5-year mortality after surgery. Secondary outcomes included mortalities during 3-year and 1-year follow-ups and cancer-specific mortality and recurrence rates during 5-, 3-, and 1-year follow-ups. A total of 19,765 patients were divided into two groups according to RAAS inhibitor prescription at discharge: 8,374 (42.4%) patients in the no RAAS inhibitor group and 11,391 (57.6%) patients in the RAAS inhibitor group. In 5022 pairs of propensity-score matched population, 5-year mortality was significantly lower in the RAAS inhibitor group (11.4% vs. 7.4%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64–0.83, P < 0.001), and 5-year recurrence rate was also lower for the RAAS inhibitor group (5.3% vs. 3.7%, HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68–0.99, P = 0.04). In our analysis, RAAS inhibitor was associated with decreased 5-year mortality in hypertensive patients who underwent cancer surgery. Prescription of RAAS inhibitor in accordance with current guidelines may be associated with improved mortality after cancer surgery.

Risk factors for long-term survival in patients with ypN+ M0 rectal cancer after radical anterior resection

Background

Regional lymph node metastases are the main adverse prognostic factor in patients with rectal cancer without distant metastases. There are discrepancies, however, regarding additional risk factors in the group of ypN + M0 patients. The purpose of the study was to assess clinical and pathological factors affecting long-term oncological outcomes in the group of ypN + M0 patients after radical rectal anterior resection.

Methods

112 patients with ypN + M0 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy and radical anterior resection were subject to a retrospective analysis. The effect of potential factors on survival was assessed with the use of Kaplan–Meier curves together with a log-rank test and multiple factor Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

In the multiple factor Cox analysis, adverse factors affecting disease-free survival (DFS) were: the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) (hazard ratio HR: 3.11, 95% CI 1.01–9.56, p = 0.047), presence of perineural invasion (HR: 7.27, 95% CI 2.74–19.3, p < 0.001) and occurrence of postoperative complications (HR: 6.79, 95% CI 2.09–22.11, p = 0.001), while a positive factor was the negative lymph node (NLN) count > 7 (HR: 0.33, 95% CI 0.12–0.88, p = 0.026). In the disease-specific survival (DSS) analysis, an adverse factor was the use of ACEIs (HR: 4.275, 95% CI 1.44–12.694, p = 0.009), while a positive effect was caused by NLN > 5 (HR: 0.22, 95% CI 0.082–0.586, p = 0.002).

Conclusions

The use of ACEIs may have a negative effect on long-term treatment outcomes in patients with ypN + M0 rectal cancer. In this group of patients, the NLN count seems to be an important prognostic factor, as well.

Effects of Antihypertensive Drugs Use on Risk and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 37 Observational Studies

Background: Antihypertensive drugs might play a key role in the risk and poor prognosis of colorectal cancer. However, current epidemiologic evidence remains inconsistent. The aim of this study is to quantify the association between antihypertensive drugs and colorectal cancer. Methods: To identify available studies, we systematically searched electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library. The risk estimates and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were collected and analyzed by using random-effects models. Heterogeneity test and sensitivity analysis were also performed. Results: Overall, 37 observational studies were included in this analysis (26 studies with cohort design, three studies with nested case-control design, and 8 studies with case-control design). Antihypertensive drugs did not present a significant effect on the risk or overall survival of patients with colorectal cancer [Risk ratio (RR) = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.95-1.04; Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.84-1.02]. In the subgroup analysis, diuretics use was significantly associated with a worse overall survival of patients with colorectal cancer (HR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.14-1.40). However, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers was associated with improved progression-free survival of patients who suffered from colorectal cancer (HR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72-0.95). Conclusion: Antihypertensive drug usage did not influence the risk and overall survival of patients with colorectal cancer in general. Further investigation reminded us that diuretics use might reduce the overall survival time in colorectal cancer patients, whereas those who took Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers had a longer progression-free survival.

Association of β-Blocker Use at Time of Radical Prostatectomy With Rate of Treatment for Prostate Cancer Recurrence

IMPORTANCE

The perioperative period has gained attention as a window of opportunity to prevent cancer recurrence. Evidence in support of a role for nonselective β-blockers (nsBBs) in cancer treatment is increasing, and counteracting cancer recurrence associated with perioperative stress and catecholamine is one of the suggested mechanisms of action.

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether use of nsBBs at the time of radical prostatectomy is associated with a lower rate of treatment for prostate cancer recurrence.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study analyzed prospectively collected data from the Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Patient Registry, Norwegian Prescription Database, and Norwegian Cause of Death Registry. Of 12 298 eligible patients, this study included 11 117 treatment-naive patients with prostate cancer (ie, no prior hormonal therapy, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy) who underwent radical prostatectomy in Norway from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2015, with a minimum progression-free follow-up of 6 months. Data analysis was performed from April 20, 2020, to April 30, 2021.

EXPOSURES

Use of nsBBs and selective β-blockers (sBBs) at time of radical prostatectomy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Treatment for cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy (defined as initiation of hormonal therapy, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy) or, if no treatment was identified, cancer-specific mortality.

RESULTS

The study included 11 117 men with prostate cancer (median [IQR] age at radical prostatectomy, 64.8 [60.4-68.3] years). Of these, 1622 (14.6%) later received treatment for cancer recurrence during a median follow-up of 4.3 years (IQR, 2.4-6.3 years). Use of nsBBs at time of surgery among 209 patients was significantly associated with a lower risk of treatment for cancer recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42-0.96; P = .03). No such association was observed for use of sBBs (aHR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.84-1.11; P = .62). Subanalyses with (1) relaxed inclusion criteria allowing for inclusion also of patients with early progression (within 6 months) and (2) only the healthiest patients (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0) supported the main findings.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, use of nsBB but not sBBs at the time of radical prostatectomy was associated with less treatment initiation for cancer recurrence. This finding, together with accumulated preclinical and clinical evidence, provides a foundation for initiation of an interventional study.

Angiotensin II receptor blockers and oral squamous cell carcinoma survival: A propensity-score-matched cohort study

Objectives

Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) improve the survival rates of patients with various cancers. However, it remains unclear whether ARBs confer a survival benefit on patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Here, we assessed the associations between ARB use and survival in patients with OSCC of different stages.

Materials and methods

This was a 10-year retrospective cohort study of OSCC patients. We enrolled 7,558 patients diagnosed with oral cancer between January 2007 and December 2017 whose details had been entered into the Chang Gung Research Database. Seven hundred and fourteen patients were recruited from the Chang Gung Research Database after performing 1:1 propensity score-matching between ARB users and non-users. Cox’s regression models with adjusted covariates were employed to detect factors influencing the survival rates of patients with OSCC.

Results

Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the overall survival (OS) rate of 180-day ARB users increased (p = 0.038). Cox’s regression models indicated that ARB use, younger patients, early-stage OSCC, and patients without diabetes mellitus were independently prognostic of improved OS. Increased OS was more prominent in 180-day ARB users in stage III, Iva, and IVb categories.

Conclusions

ARB use for more than 180 days is associated with an increased survival rate and is a positive, independent prognostic factor in patients with OSCC. A further two-arm study should be conducted to confirm the clinical usefulness of ARBs in OSCC patients.

Antihypertensive medication use and ovarian cancer survival

OBJECTIVE

Although experimental models suggest that use of beta-blockers, a common antihypertensive agent, may improve survival in ovarian cancer patients, results from clinical studies have been mixed.

METHODS

We evaluated the associations of pre-diagnostic (n = 950) and post-diagnostic (n = 743) use of antihypertensive medications with survival among patients with invasive, epithelial ovarian cancer in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS; 1994-2016) and NHSII (2001-2017), with follow-up until 2018 and 2019, respectively. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for ovarian cancer mortality according to antihypertensive medication use before and after diagnosis, considering multiple drug classes (beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, thiazide diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors).

RESULTS

After adjusting for age, BMI, smoking status and tumor characteristics, pre-diagnostic use versus non-use of calcium-channel blockers was associated with higher ovarian cancer mortality (HR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.13, 1.96), which was primarily due to polytherapy involving calcium-channel blockers (HR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.15, 2.26). Pre-diagnostic use of beta-blockers, thiazide diuretics, or ACE inhibitors was not associated with ovarian cancer mortality. No association was observed for post-diagnostic antihypertensive medication use individually or in combination, except for lower mortality associated with polytherapy involving ACE inhibitors (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.91).

CONCLUSION

Overall, we did not find clear relationships between antihypertensive medication use and ovarian cancer mortality. However, given the limitation of the data, we cannot determine whether the association may differ by type of beta-blockers. The reasons underlying the observed associations with pre-diagnostic calcium-channel blocker use and post-diagnostic ACE inhibitor use require further investigation.

Blood Vessels and Peripheral Nerves as Key Players in Cancer Progression and Therapy Resistance

Simple Summary

The interactions between cancer cells and the surrounding blood vessels and peripheral nerves are critical in all the phases of tumor development. Accordingly, therapies that specifically target vessels and nerves represent promising anticancer approaches. The first aim of this review is to document the importance of blood vessels and peripheral nerves in both cancer onset and local or distant growth of tumoral cells. We then focus on the state-of-the-art therapies that limit cancer progression through the impairment of blood vessels and peripheral nerves. The mentioned literature is helpful for the scientific community to appreciate the recent advances in these two fundamental components of tumors.

Abstract

Cancer cells continuously interact with the tumor microenvironment (TME), a heterogeneous milieu that surrounds the tumor mass and impinges on its phenotype. Among the components of the TME, blood vessels and peripheral nerves have been extensively studied in recent years for their prominent role in tumor development from tumor initiation. Cancer cells were shown to actively promote their own vascularization and innervation through the processes of angiogenesis and axonogenesis. Indeed, sprouting vessels and axons deliver several factors needed by cancer cells to survive and proliferate, including nutrients, oxygen, and growth signals, to the expanding tumor mass. Nerves and vessels are also fundamental for the process of metastatic spreading, as they provide both the pro-metastatic signals to the tumor and the scaffold through which cancer cells can reach distant organs. Not surprisingly, continuously growing attention is devoted to the development of therapies specifically targeting these structures, with promising initial results. In this review, we summarize the latest evidence that supports the importance of blood vessels and peripheral nerves in cancer pathogenesis, therapy resistance, and innovative treatments.

Impact of Concomitant Cardiovascular Medication on Survival of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Sunitinib or Pazopanib in the First Line

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are often elderly and have various comorbidities, including cardiovascular diseases. Although these patients have extensive co-exposure to targeted therapy and cardiovascular drugs, the impact of this co-exposure on outcomes for patients with mRCC remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate the association between the use of cardiovascular medication and survival of patients with mRCC.

METHODS

The study included 343 consecutive patients with mRCC treated with sunitinib or pazopanib in the first line. Clinical data obtained from the Renal Cell Carcinoma Information System (RENIS) clinical registry and hospital information systems were retrospectively analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared according to the use of common medications, including antihypertensives (i.e., β-blockers [BBs], angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics), acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin), statins, and proton pump inhibitors.

RESULTS

The univariate Cox analysis evaluating the impact of the assessed comedications on patient survival revealed that only BBs were significantly associated with PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.533, p < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.641, p = 0.006). The median PFS and OS for users of BBs was 18.39 and 37.60 months versus 8.16 and 20.4 months for patients not using BBs (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). The Cox multivariate analysis showed that the use of BBs was a significant factor for both PFS (HR 0.428, p = 0.001) and OS (HR 0.518, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this retrospective study suggest that the use of BBs is associated with favorable outcomes for patients with mRCC treated with sunitinib or pazopanib in the first line.

Effect of beta-blockers on survival of lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The recent interest in beta-blockers as possible agents for drug repurposing in oncology arises from many pre-clinical and epidemiologic studies suggesting a possible clinically relevant antitumour effect. In lung cancer, given the contradictory results obtained, it is crucial to further study its effects. A systematic review of the literature was planned to evaluate a possible beneficial effect of beta-blocker on overall survival in lung cancer patients. Medline and Embase databases were searched from inception until 1 May 2018 to identify published studies that assessed the effect beta-blocker use on overall survival in lung cancer patients. Risk of bias was evaluated by Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for overall survival were estimated using a random-effects model. Of 920 studies, seven (all retrospective and observational, six cohort and one case-control), including 7448 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Beta-blocker users with lung cancer had no increased overall survival compared to non-users (hazard ratio = 1.00; 95% confidence interval = 0.91-1.10; I = 45%). Similarly, beta-blocker users with non-small cell lung cancer had no increased overall survival compared to beta-blocker non-users (hazard ratio = 0.96; 95% confidence interval = 0.80-1.17; I = 56%). Our findings do not suggest an overall survival advantage in patients with lung cancer using beta-blocker therapy when compared to non-users. Further prospective cohort studies, designed to overcome the intrinsic limitations of retrospective observational studies are warranted to definitively clarify any possible beneficial effect of beta-blockers on lung cancer overall survival.

Unravelling the tangled web of hypertension and cancer

Cardiovascular disease remains the primary cause of mortality globally, being responsible for an estimated 17 million deaths every year. Cancer is the second leading cause of death on a global level with roughly 9 million deaths per year being attributed to neoplasms. The two share multiple common risk factors such as obesity, poor physical exercise, older age, smoking and there exists rare monogenic hypertension syndromes. Hypertension is the most important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and affects more than a billion people worldwide and may also be a risk factor for the development of certain types of cancer (e.g. renal cell carcinoma (RCC)). The interaction space of the two conditions becomes more complicated when the well-described hypertensive effect of certain antineoplastic drugs is considered along with the extensive amount of literature on the association of different classes of antihypertensive drugs with cancer risk/prevention. The cardiovascular risks associated with antineoplastic treatment calls for efficient management of relative adverse events and the development of practical strategies for efficient decision-making in the clinic. Pharmacogenetic interactions between cancer treatment and hypertension-related genes is not to be ruled out, but the evidence is not still ample to be incorporated in clinical practice. Precision Medicine has the potential to bridge the gap of knowledge regarding the full spectrum of interactions between cancer and hypertension (and cardiovascular disease) and provide novel solutions through the emerging field of cardio-oncology. In this review, we aimed to examine the bidirectional associations between cancer and hypertension including pharmacotherapy.

The Therapeutic Potential of Targeting the Angiotensin Pathway as a Novel Therapeutic Approach to Ameliorating Post-Surgical Adhesions

BACKGROUND

Post-surgical adhesion is a common complication after abdominal or pelvic surgeries. Despite improvements in surgical techniques or the application of physical barriers, little improvements have been achieved. It causes bowel obstruction, pelvic pain, and infertility in women and has an adverse effect on the quality of life. Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS) is traditionally considered as a blood pressure regulator. However, recent studies also indicate that the RAS plays a vital role in other processes, including oxidative stress, fibrosis, proliferation, inflammation, and the wound healing process. Angiotensin II (Ang II) is the main upstream effector of the RAS that can bind to the AT1 receptor (ATIR). A growing body of evidence has revealed that targeting Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs), Angiotensin II type 1 Receptor Blockers (ARBs), and Direct Renin Inhibitors (DRIs) can prevent post-surgical adhesions. Here we provide an overview of the therapeutic effect of RAS antagonists for adhesion.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library were reviewed to identify potential agents targeting the RAS system as a potential approach for post-surgical adhesion.

RESULTS

Available evidence suggests the involvement of the RAS signaling pathway in inflammation, proliferation, and fibrosis pathways as well as in post-surgical adhesions. Several FDA-approved drugs are being used for targeting the RAS system. Some of them are being tested in different models to reduce fibrosis and improve adhesion after surgery, including Telmisartan, valsartan, and enalapril.

CONCLUSION

Identification of the pathological causes of post-surgical adhesion and the potential role of targeting Renin-Angiotensin System may help prevent this problem. Based on the pathological function of RAS signaling after surgeries, the administration of ARBs may be considered as a novel and efficient approach to prevent postsurgical adhesions. Pre-clinical and clinical studies should be carried out to have better information on the clinical significance of this therapy against post-surgical adhesion formation.

Association Between Antihypertensive Medication Use and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The prevalence rate of hypertension and breast cancer increases with advancing age. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs), β-blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and diuretics are widely used to treat patients with hypertension. Although, the association between the use of antihypertensive medication and breast cancer has been highly debated, recent evidence supporting this association remains controversial. Objective: To evaluate the association between the use of antihypertensive medication and the risk of breast cancer and its prognosis. Methods: This study was conducted using data from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases retrieved for the period from January 2000 to April 2021. Articles and their references were checked and summary effects were calculated using random- and fixed-effects models. Heterogeneity test and sensitivity analysis were also performed. Results: This meta-analysis included 57 articles, which were all related to breast cancer risk or prognosis. Assessment of breast cancer risk using the pooled data showed that the use of BBs or CCBs or diuretics was associated with increased cancer risk [BB: relative risk (RR) = 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.09-1.32; CCBs: RR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.08; diuretics: RR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11]. Long-term use of diuretic increased the risk of breast cancer (RR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.20), whereas long-term RASIs treatment reduced the risk (RR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.91). In addition, we found that diuretic users may be related to elevated breast cancer-specific mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.18, 95% CI 1.04-1.33], whereas using other antihypertensive medications was not associated with this prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Conclusion: Using CCBs, BBs, and diuretics increased the risk of breast cancer. In addition, diuretics may elevate the risk of breast cancer-specific mortality. The long-term use of RASIs was associated with a significantly lower breast cancer risk, compared with non-users. Thus, this analysis provides evidence to support the benefits of the routine use of RASIs in patients with hypertension, which has important public health implications.

β-Blocker use is not associated with improved clinical outcomes in women with breast cancer: a meta-analysis

Background: Evidence remains inconsistent regarding the potential influence of β-blocker (BB) use on clinical outcomes in women with breast cancer. We aimed to evaluate the association between BB and prognosis of breast cancer in an updated meta-analysis.

Methods: Follow-up studies comparing the clinical outcomes of breast cancer in women with and without use of BB were included by search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane’s Library. A random-effect model was used to pool the results.

Results: Seventeen observational studies were included. Pooled results did not support a significant association between BB use and breast cancer recurrence (risk ratio [RR] = 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68–1.07, P=0.17), breast cancer related deaths (RR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.65–1.06, P=0.14), or all-cause deaths (RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.91–1.11, P=0.91) in women with breast cancer. Study characteristics such as sample size, definition of BB use, follow-up durations, adjustment of menopausal status, or quality score did not significantly affect the results. Subgroup analyses showed that BB may be associated with a trend of reduced risk of all-cause deaths in women with breast cancer in prospective studies (two datasets, RR = 0.81, P=0.05), but not in retrospective studies (eight datasets, RR = 1.06, P=0.16; P for subgroup analyses = 0.02).

Conclusions: Current evidence from observational studies does not support a significant association between BB use and improved prognosis in women with breast cancer.

Beta-blocker and survival in patients with lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Background

Beta-blocker (BB) is suggested to have anticancer efficacy. However, the potential influence of BB use on overall survival (OS) in patients with lung cancer remains undetermined. We aimed to evaluate the above relationship in an updated meta-analysis.

Methods

Observational studies comparing OS between users and non-users of BB with lung cancer were identified by search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane’s Library. A random-effect model was used to pool the results.

Results

Ten retrospective cohort studies with 30870 patients were included. Overall, BB use was not associated with significantly improved OS in lung cancer (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98 to 1.06, p = 0.33) with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 29%). Stratified analyses showed similar results in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer, in studies with BB use before and after the diagnosis of lung cancer, and in studies with or without adjustment of smoking. Use of BB was associated with improved OS in patients with stage III lung cancer (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.98, p = 0.02) and in patients that did not receive surgery resection (HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.96, p = 0.02), while use of non-selective BB was associated with worse OS (HR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.28, p = 0.03).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis of retrospective cohort studies does not support a significant association between BB use and improved OS in lung cancer.

Lung Cancer Adverse Events Reports for Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors: Data Mining of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database

Because of contradictory evidence from clinical trials, the association between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and lung cancer needs further evaluation. As such, the current study is to assess disproportionate reporting of primary malignant lung cancer among reports for ACEIs submitted to the FDA adverse event reporting system utilizing a pharmacovigilance approach. We conducted a disproportionality analysis of primary malignant lung cancer adverse events associated with 10 ACEIs by calculating the reported odds ratios (ROR) and information component (IC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). ROR was adjusted for sex, age, and reporting year by logistic regression analyses. From January 2004 to March 2020, a total of 622 cases of lung cancer adverse event reports were identified for ACEIs users. Significant disproportionate association was found for ACEIs as a drug class (ROR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.13–1.32; IC: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.17–0.39. adjusted ROR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.02–1.49). After stratification based on gender, a subset analysis suggested that female patients exhibited a significant disproportionate association, while male patients did not. Sensitivity analyses that limited the data by reporting region, comorbidity, and reporting year also showed similar trends. Statistical significant lung cancer signals were detected among patients who received ACEI, especially female patients. The disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database suggests mildly increased reporting of lung cancer among ACEI users. Further robust epidemiological studies are necessary to confirm this relationship.

New tricks of old drugs: Repurposing non-chemo drugs and dietary phytochemicals as adjuvants in anti-tumor therapies

Combination therapy has long been applied to enhance therapeutic effect and deal with the occurrence of multi-drug resistance in cancer treatment. However, the overlapping toxicity of multiple anticancer drugs to healthy tissues and increasing financial burden on patients emerged as major concerns. As promising alternatives to chemo agents, repurposed non-chemo drugs and dietary phytochemicals have been investigated as adjuvants to conventional anti-tumor therapeutics, offering a safe and economic strategy for combination therapy. In this review, we aim to highlight the advances in research about combination therapy using conventional therapeutics and repurposed drugs or phytochemicals for an enhanced anti-tumor efficacy, along with the mechanisms involved in the synergism. Beyond these, we outlined the potential challenges and solutions for clinical translation of the proposed combination therapy, providing a safe and affordable strategy to improve the reach of cancer therapy to low income regions with such new tricks of old drugs.

Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System-based Antihypertensive Agents and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer Among Medicare Beneficiaries

BACKGROUND

Biologic evidence suggests that angiotensin II may play a role in tumor progression or growth. We compared the short-term colorectal cancer (CRC) risk among initiators of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) versus guideline-recommended clinical alternatives (beta blockers, calcium channel blockers [CCB], and thiazides).

METHODS

We conducted a new-user cohort study on U.S. Medicare beneficiaries aged over 65 years, who initiated antihypertensive monotherapy during 2007-2013 and were free of cancer diagnosis before drug initiation. Follow-up began 6 months postinitiation to allow time for the diagnostic delay. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using propensity score weighted Cox regression, overall and stratified by time since drug initiation, and 5-year cumulative risk differences (RD) using Kaplan-Meier estimator. We assessed the potential for unmeasured confounding using supplemental data from Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey.

RESULTS

For analyses without censoring for treatment changes, we observed 532 CRC events among 111,533 ACEI/ARB initiators. After a median follow-up of 2.2 years (interquartile range: 1.0-3.7), CRC risk was similar between ACEI/ARB and active comparators, with adjusted HRs of 1.0 (95% CI = 0.85, 1.1) for ACEI/ARB versus beta blockers, 1.2 (95% CI = 0.97, 1.4) for ACEI/ARB versus CCB and 1.0 (95% CI = 0.80, 1.3) for ACEI/ARB versus thiazide. Five-year RDs and as-treated analyses, which censored follow-up at medication changes, produced similar findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on real-world antihypertensive utilization patterns in Medicare beneficiaries, our study suggests no association between ACEI/ARB initiation and the short-term CRC risk.

Association Between the Overall Risk of Prostate Cancer and Use of Calcium Channel Blockers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Although calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are now commonly prescribed to treat hypertension as a first-line drug therapy, their impact on prostate cancer (PCa) is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the association between CCB use and the overall risk of PCa.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched up to December 26, 2019, stratified according to statistical method of outcome [odd ratios (ORs), relative ratios (RRs), hazard ratios (HRs)] and cumulative duration of CCB use. The quality assessment of included studies was evaluated by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Fixed effects models were used to study the association between CCB use and the risk of PCa. Between-study heterogeneity was quantified by using Cochran's Q-statistic and I² statistics. Sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding the studies one by one, and publication bias was analyzed by using funnel plots.

FINDINGS

Nineteen studies with 1,418,407 patients were identified for inclusion in the meta-analysis, which was based on the comparison of cohort studies, nested case-control studies, and case-control studies. Pooled estimates showed a RR of 1.08 (95% CI, 1.05-1.11; P < 0.00001) and a HR of 1.07 (95% CI, 1.02-1.13; P = 0.008) for association between CCB use and the risk of PCa. In addition, the results of subgroup analysis showed that CCB users of <5 years had an 8% increased overall risk of PCa (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04-1.12; P = 0.0001), and CCB users of 5-10 years had a 13% increased overall risk of PCa (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04-1.23; P = 0.003).

IMPLICATIONS

CCB use had a tendency to increase the overall risk of PCa, and cumulative duration of CCB use might also be positively correlated with the overall risk of PCa.

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitor use and colorectal cancer risk and mortality: A dose-response meta analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to determine whether use of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors would increase colorectal cancer morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Databases were electronically searched to collect data of RAS use and colorectal cancer morbidity and mortality from inception to October 2018. Stata 12.0 software was used to perform a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 16 publications involving 2,847,597 participants were included. RAS inhibitor use was related to colorectal cancer risk (relative risk (RR): 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-0.93) and mortality (RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.66-0.98) decrement. Subgroup analysis showed angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.69-0.96) or ARB (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.73-0.98) or ACEI (RR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.70-0.92) were related to colorectal cancer risk decrement. Furthermore, RAS inhibitor use was related to colorectal cancer risk decrement in Caucasians (RR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.80-0.96) and Asians (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.61-0.85). Additionally, dose-response showed that per one year duration of RAS inhibitor use incremental increase was related to 6% colorectal cancer risk decrement (RR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.90-0.97).

CONCLUSION

According to the evidence, RAS inhibitor use was associated with colorectal cancer risk and mortality decrement.

Antihypertensive drug use and prostate cancer-specific mortality in Finnish men

The aim of this study was to investigate pre- and post-diagnostic use of antihypertensive drugs on prostate cancer (PCa)-specific survival and the initiation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The cohort investigated 8,253 PCa patients with 837 PCa-specific deaths during the median follow-up of 7.6 years after diagnosis. Information on drug use, cancer incidence, clinical features of PCa, and causes of death was collected from Finnish registries. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using Cox regression with antihypertensive drug use as a time-dependent variable. Separate analyses were performed on PCa survival related to pre- and post-diagnostic use of drugs and on the initiation of ADT. Antihypertensive drug use overall was associated with an increased risk of PCa-specific death (Pre-PCa: 1.21 (1.04–1.4), Post-PCa: 1.2 (1.02–1.41)). With respect to the separate drug groups, angiotensin II type 1 receptor (ATr) blockers, were associated with improved survival (Post-PCa: 0.81 (0.67–0.99)) and diuretics with an increased risk (Post-PCa: 1.25 (1.05–1.49)). The risk of ADT initiation was slightly higher among antihypertensive drug users as compared to non-users. In conclusion, this study supports anti-cancer effect of ATr blockers on PCa prognosis and this should be investigated further in controlled clinical trials.

Beta-adrenergic signaling on neuroendocrine differentiation, angiogenesis, and metastasis in prostate cancer progression

Prostate cancer is a complex, heterogeneous disease that mainly affects the older male population with a high-mortality rate. The mechanisms underlying prostate cancer progression are still incompletely understood. Beta-adrenergic signaling has been shown to regulate multiple cellular processes as a mediator of chronic stress. Recently, beta-adrenergic signaling has been reported to affect the development of aggressive prostate cancer by regulating neuroendocrine differentiation, angiogenesis, and metastasis. Here, we briefly summarize and discuss recent advances in these areas and their implications in prostate cancer therapeutics. We aim to provide a better understanding of the contribution of beta-adrenergic signaling to the progression of aggressive prostate cancer.

Agonist Effects of Propranolol on Non-Tumor Human Breast Cells

The β-blocker propranolol (PROP) has been proposed as a repurposed treatment for breast cancer. The similarity of action between β-agonists and antagonists found on breast cells encouraged us to compare PROP and isoproterenol (ISO, agonist) signaling pathways on a human breast cell line. Cell proliferation was measured by cell counting and DNA-synthesis. Cell adhesion was measured counting the cells that remained adhered to the plastic after different treatments. Changes in actin cytoskeleton were observed by fluorescence staining and Western Blot. ISO and PROP caused a diminution of cell proliferation and an increase of cell adhesion, reverted by the pure β-antagonist ICI-118551. ISO and PROP induced a reorganization of actin cytoskeleton increasing F-actin, p-COFILIN and p-LIMK. While ISO elicited a marked enhancement of cAMP concentrations and an increase of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) and cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) phosphorylation, PROP did not. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis inhibition or β-arrestin1 dominant-negative mutant abrogated PROP-induced cell adhesion and COFILIN phosphorylation. The fact that PROP has been proposed as an adjuvant drug for breast cancer makes it necessary to determine the specific action of PROP in breast models. These results provide an explanation for the discrepancies observed between experimental results and clinical evidence.

Anticancer Effects of Antihypertensive L-Type Calcium Channel Blockers on Chemoresistant Lung Cancer Cells via Autophagy and Apoptosis

Purpose

Hypertension and cancer are frequently found comorbidity occurring in same individual. This study was intended to evaluate the anticancer effects of commonly used antihypertensive medications and chemotherapy on chemoresistant lung cancer cells.

Methods

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs), including Verapamil, Diltiazem, and Nifedipine, either alone or combined with docetaxel (DOC) or vincristine (VCR) were used to treat A549 lung adenocarcinoma chemoresistant sublines. Cell viability was determined by MTT assay, and colony formation assay was used to demonstrate the long-term effect of CCBs on proliferation of the sublines. Apoptosis was evaluated by Annexin V assay and autophagy intensity was quantitated from acidic vesicular organelle formation. Pan-caspase inhibitor, shATG5 interference and chloroquine were applied to study the roles of Verapamil on apoptosis and autophagy, with related proteins verified by Western blot analysis.

Results

Results show that 10 μM of Verapamil and Diltiazem, but not Nifedipine, differentially induce autophagy in DOC-resistant or VCR-resistant A549 cells, respectively. When CCBs are combined with DOC or VCR to treat the sublines, 10 μM of Verapamil induces autophagy more significantly than Diltiazem and Nifedipine, respectively, in DOC-resistant (54.91±0.76, 18.03±0.69, 7.05±0.30) or VCR-resistant A549 (32.41±1.04, 21.51±0.63, 7.14±0.24) cells. Inhibition of apoptosis by pan-caspase inhibitor partly reduced cell death indicates association of caspase-dependent cell death but with persistence of autophagy. Inhibition of autophagy by interfering ATG5 expression reduced c-PARP level and apoptotic cells suggest a pro-death role of autophagy. Chloroquine treatment enhanced autophagosome accumulation and cell death but with reduced c-PARP level suggests that mechanism of caspase-independent cell death also contributes to Verapamil/chemotherapy-induced anticancer effects. 

Conclusion

Verapamil combined with DOC or VCR induces chemoresistant lung cancer cells to death through autophagy burst and apoptosis more strongly than Diltiazem and Nifedipine. Administering Verapamil or Diltiazem individually with chemotherapy, but not Nifedipine, can be considered in lung cancer patients with hypertension.

The renin-angiotensin system blockers and survival in digestive system malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Accumulating pre-clinical and clinical studies suggested that the renin-angiotensin system blockers (RASBs) possess anti-carcinogenic properties, and their use is associated with favorable outcomes in many types of cancers.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of relevant databases through January 2019 was conducted to identify studies assessing the RASBs on prognostic outcomes in digestive system malignancies patients on the basis of predetermined selection criteria for pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 13 studies were included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis showed that the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) resulted in a significant improvement in overall survival (HR 0.79; 95%CI 0.70-0.89; P < .000), cancer-specific survival (HR 0.81; 95%CI 0.73-0.90; P < .000) and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.68; 95%CI 0.54-0.85; P = .001), but not progression-free survival (HR 0.88; 95%CI 0.73-1.07; P = .183) and disease-free survival (HR 0.50; 95%CI 0.11-2.39; P = .103). Subgroup analysis indicated that the use of RASBs has a significant improvement of overall survival (OS) in pancreatic cancer, liver cancer, and gastric cancer. Two studies evaluated the dose-response relationship between ACEIs/ARBs therapy and survival and showed higher doses and better survival [(1-364 defined daily doses: odds ratio (OR) 0.89, 95%CI 0.78-1.01, P = .076), (≥365 defined daily doses: OR 0.54, 95%CI: 0.24-1.24, P = .148].

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analysis of studies supports a beneficial association between use of RASBs and survival of digestive system malignancies.

Molecular Links Between Angiogenesis and Neuroendocrine Phenotypes in Prostate Cancer Progression

As a common therapy for prostate cancer, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is effective for the majority of patients. However, prolonged ADT promotes drug resistance and progression to an aggressive variant with reduced androgen receptor signaling, so called neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC). Until present, NEPC is still poorly understood, and lethal with no effective treatments. Elevated expression of neuroendocrine related markers and increased angiogenesis are two prominent phenotypes of NEPC, and both of them are positively associated with cancers progression. However, direct molecular links between the two phenotypes in NEPC and their mechanisms remain largely unclear. Their elucidation should substantially expand our knowledge in NEPC. This knowledge, in turn, would facilitate the development of effective NEPC treatments. We recently showed that a single critical pathway regulates both ADT-enhanced angiogenesis and elevated expression of neuroendocrine markers. This pathway consists of CREB1, EZH2, and TSP1. Here, we seek new insights to identify molecules common to pathways promoting angiogenesis and neuroendocrine phenotypes in prostate cancer. To this end, our focus is to summarize the literature on proteins reported to regulate both neuroendocrine marker expression and angiogenesis as potential molecular links. These proteins, often described in separate biological contexts or diseases, include AURKA and AURKB, CHGA, CREB1, EZH2, FOXA2, GRK3, HIF1, IL-6, MYCN, ONECUT2, p53, RET, and RB1. We also present the current efforts in prostate cancer or other diseases to target some of these proteins, which warrants testing for NEPC, given the urgent unmet need in treating this aggressive variant of prostate cancer.

Incidental Use of Beta-Blockers Is Associated with Outcome of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Bevacizumab-Based Therapy: A Single-Institution Retrospective Analysis of 514 Patients

Background: Beta-adrenergic signalling plays an important role in several cancer-related processes, including angiogenesis. The impact of beta-blocker use on prognosis of cancer patients treated with antiangiogenic agents is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between the incidental use of beta-blockers and the outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with bevacizumab-based therapy. Methods: Clinical data from 514 mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab between 2005 and 2019 were analysed retrospectively. The association of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with the incidental use of beta-blockers and other common antihypertensive drugs was assessed. Results: The median PFS and OS for patients using beta-blockers was 11.40 (95% confidence interval (CI) 10.10–13.61) months and 26.8 (95% CI 22.2–32.2) months compared with 8.30 (95% CI 7.80–9.57) and 21.0 (95% CI 17.8–23.8) months for patients not using beta-blockers (p = 0.006 and p = 0.009, respectively). In the Cox multivariate analysis, the use of beta-blockers was a significant factor predicting both PFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.763 (95% CI 0.606–0.960), p = 0.021) and OS (HR = 0.730 (95% CI 0.560–0.951), p = 0.020). Conclusions: The results of the present retrospective study suggest that there is a significant association between the use of beta-blockers and favourable outcomes of mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab-based therapy.

Beta-Blocker Use and Lung Cancer Mortality in a Nationwide Cohort Study of Patients with Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

β-Adrenergic receptor blockers have been associated with improved survival among patients with different types of malignancies, but available data for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are contradictory and limited to small hospital-based studies. We therefore aimed to investigate whether β-blocker use at the time of cancer diagnosis is associated with lung cancer mortality in the largest general population-based cohort of patients with NSCLC to date.

METHODS

For this retrospectively defined nationwide cohort study, we used prospectively collected data from Swedish population and health registers. Through the Swedish Cancer Register, we identified 18,429 patients diagnosed with a primary NSCLC between 2006 and 2014 with follow-up to 2015. Cox regression was used to estimate the association between β-blocker use at time of cancer diagnosis ascertained from the Prescribed Drug Register and cancer-specific mortality identified from the Cause of Death Register.

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up of 10.2 months, 14,994 patients died (including 13,398 from lung cancer). Compared with nonuse, β-blocker use (predominantly prevalent use, 93%) was not associated with lung cancer mortality [HR (95% confidence interval): 1.01 (0.97-1.06)]. However, the possibility that diverging associations for specific β-blockers and some histopathologic subtypes exist cannot be excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationwide cohort of patients with NSCLC, β-blocker use was not associated with lung cancer mortality when assessed in aggregate in the total cohort, but evidence for some β-blockers is less conclusive.

IMPACT

Our results do not indicate that β-blocker use at lung cancer diagnosis reduces the cancer-specific mortality rate in patients with NSCLC.

Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers may reduce tumor recurrence in left-sided and early colorectal cancers

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin signaling is suggested to be involved in tumorigenesis, tumor proliferation, and metastases. In colorectal cancer (CRC), it was demonstrated that angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) may reduce the risk of CRC; however, their impact on tumor recurrence remains unknown. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated the impact of ACEIs/ARBs on tumor recurrence in CRC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively investigated the clinicopathological data of 461 stage I-III CRC patients. We divided the patients into those who took an ACEI and/or ARB (the ACEI/ARB+ group) and those who did not (the ACEI/ARB- group), and we compared the two groups' recurrence-free survival (RFS) using a Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and log rank test. We also examined the impact of AGTR1 expression on tumor recurrence, using two public CRC datasets.

RESULTS

The Kaplan-Meier curves showed a trend toward improved RFS in the ACEI/ARB+ group versus the ACEI/ARB- group (p = 0.063). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the RFS was significantly better in the ACEI/ARB+ group versus the ACEI/ARB- group in the patients with left-sided CRC (p = 0.030) and those with stage I CRC (p = 0.009). Consistent with these findings, the AGTR1 expression was higher in the left-sided versus right-sided colon (p = 0.048). High AGTR1 expression levels were associated with poor RFS in the GSE39582 dataset's stage I-III CRC patients (p < 0.001), and this finding was also validated in the GSE17536 dataset (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

ACEI/ARB treatment may reduce tumor recurrence in left-sided CRC and early-stage CRC.

Use of Antihypertensive Medications and Survival Rates for Breast, Colorectal, Lung, or Stomach Cancer

Using time-dependent Cox regression models, we examined associations of common antihypertensive medications with overall cancer survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS), with comprehensive adjustment for potential confounding factors. Participants were from the Shanghai Women's Health Study (1996-2000) and Shanghai Men's Health Study (2002-2006) in Shanghai, China. Included were 2,891 incident breast, colorectal, lung, and stomach cancer cases. Medication use was extracted from electronic medical records. With a median 3.4-year follow-up after diagnosis (interquartile range, 1.0-6.3), we found better outcomes among users of angiotensin II receptor blockers with colorectal cancer (OS: adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44, 0.86; DSS: adjusted HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.87) and stomach cancer (OS: adjusted HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.94; DSS: adjusted HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.98) and among users of β-adrenergic receptor blockers with colorectal cancer (OS: adjusted HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.35, 0.72; DSS: adjusted HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.73). Better survival was also found for calcium channel blockers (DSS: adjusted HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.97) and diuretics (OS: adjusted HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.45, 0.96; DSS: adjusted HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.38, 0.85) with stomach cancer. Our findings suggest angiotensin II receptor blockers, β-adrenergic receptor blockers, and calcium channel blockers might be associated with improved survival outcomes of gastrointestinal cancers.

Post-diagnosis use of antihypertensive medications and the risk of death from ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine associations between post-diagnosis use of antihypertensive (AH) medications including thiazide diuretics (TDs), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), beta blockers (BBs) [both non-selective (NSBBs) and selective (SBBs)] and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and ovarian cancer-specific survival.

METHODS

This cohort study used SEER-Medicare data on 2195 women 66+ years of age who were diagnosed with ovarian cancer during 2007-2012 and who survived for at least 12 months. Use of an AH class was defined as two or more fills during the year after diagnosis. Ovarian cancer-specific death was assessed starting one year after diagnosis and continued through the end of 2013. Associations between AH use and ovarian cancer-specific mortality were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models, comparing users of a given class of AH to non-AH users.

RESULTS

Overall, 718 (33%), 690 (31%), 521 (24%), 154 (7%) of women used a TD, ACEI, BB, or CCB, respectively, with some women (48%) using more than one class of drug. Ovarian cancer-specific mortality was found to be lower among women who used an ACEI (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.92), a TD (aHR 0.82, 95%CI 0.68-0.99), or a NSBB (aHR 0.60, 95%CI 0.43-0.83), but no such association was seen in women who took a SBB or CCB.

CONCLUSION

We observed that women who took certain forms of an AH medication during the year following a diagnosis of ovarian cancer were thereafter at a relatively reduced risk of dying from their disease. However, the potential for residual confounding by disease severity argues for a cautious interpretation.

Antiarrhythmic drug usage and prostate cancer: a population-based cohort study

Even though the relationship between antiarrhythmic drug usage and subsequent prostate cancer (PCa) risk has recently been highlighted, relevant findings in the previous literature are still inconsistent. In addition, very few studies have attempted to investigate the association between sodium channel blockers or potassium channel blockers for arrhythmia and the subsequent PCa risk. Therefore, this cohort study aimed to find the relationship between antiarrhythmic drug usage and the subsequent PCa risk using a population-based dataset. The data used in this study were derived from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005, Taiwan, China. We respectively identified 9988 sodium channel blocker users, 3663 potassium channel blocker users, 65 966 beta-blocker users, 23 366 calcium channel blockers users, and 7031 digoxin users as the study cohorts. The matched comparison cohorts (one comparison subject for each antiarrhythmic drug user) were selected from the same dataset. Each patient was tracked for a 5-year period to define those who were subsequently diagnosed with PCa. After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, and age, Cox proportional hazard regressions found that the hazard ratio (HR) of subsequent PCa for sodium channel blocker users was 1.12 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84–1.50), for potassium channel blocker users was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.59–1.34), for beta-blocker users was 1.08 (95% CI: 0.96–1.22), for calcium channel blocker users was 1.14 (95% CI: 0.95–1.36), and for digoxin users was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.67–1.18), compared to their matched nonusers. We concluded that there were no statistical associations between different types of antiarrhythmic drug usage and subsequent PCa risk.

Calcium Channel Blocker Use and the Risk for Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Nested Case-Control Study

INTRODUCTION

Calcium channels play a significant role in the regulation of cell proliferation and apoptosis. This study investigates associations between calcium channel blocker (CCB) use and the incidence of prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

A nested case-control study was conducted using the Clalit Health Services database. We formed a population-based cohort of patients who were prescribed their first antihypertensive agent between 2000 and 2014. For each newly diagnosed PCa case in the cohort, 10 controls were matched by age, calendar year of cohort entry, and duration of follow-up. Multivariate conditional logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the odds ratios (ORs) of PCa among CCB users compared with users of other antihypertensive drugs.

RESULTS

We identified 4346 patients with newly diagnosed PCa during the median follow-up of 5.3 years. The exposure to CCBs was associated with a slight increase in risk for PCa (OR 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.18) when compared with non-CCB antihypertensive drugs. In secondary analyses, evidence was found of a duration-response relationship, with the association for PCa increasing by 27% for every 10-year increment of CCB use (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.04-1.56).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this large population-based study indicate a modest but significant increase in the risk of PCa among CCB users, and the risk increases with duration of use.

Antihypertensive drugs and prostate cancer risk in a Finnish population-based cohort

BACKGROUND

The etiology of prostate cancer (PCa) involves environmental and genetic factors. Understanding the role of medication use on PCa risk may clarify the pathophysiological changes and mechanisms in development of cancer.

METHODS

This study investigated PCa risk in relation to overall use of anti-hypertensive drugs and those with specific mechanisms of action. The study cohort (78,615 men) was linked to the prescription database to obtain information on medication use during 20-year follow-up. Information was obtained on PCa diagnoses, causes of deaths, and for a sub-set on B.M.I. and use of non-prescription drugs. Time-dependent drug use variables hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Use of antihypertensive drugs slightly increased PCa risk (HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.11-1.22). The risk increase was clearest for metastatic PCa (HR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.14-1.62). ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, and diuretics were all separately associated with a small excess risk (HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.01-1.19, HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.06-1.21, and HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.07-1.27, respectively). None of the other groups showed a clear association with PCa risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of antihypertensive drugs was associated with increased prostate cancer risk. Similar risk association for multiple drug groups suggests that the findings may not reflect a direct medication effect, but may be due to underlying hypertension.

Postdiagnostic Calcium Channel Blocker Use and Breast Cancer Mortality: A Population-based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

There have long been concerns that calcium channel blockers (CCBs), widely used to treat hypertension, may contribute to malignant growth through the evasion of apoptosis and proliferation of cancer cells. Worryingly, a recent cohort study found breast cancer patients who used CCBs had higher death rates, but interpreting these results was difficult as they were based on all-cause mortality and medication use before cancer diagnosis. We used UK population-based data to more robustly investigate the association between CCB use and cancer-specific mortality.

METHODS

We selected a cohort of patients with breast cancer diagnosed between 1998 and 2012 from English cancer registries. We linked to prescription and clinical records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, and to death records from the Office for National Statistics. We used adjusted, time-dependent Cox regression models to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) comparing breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality between postdiagnostic CCB users and nonusers.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 23,669 breast cancer patients, of whom 5,141 used CCBs and 3,053 died due to their breast cancer during follow-up. After adjustment, CCB users had similar breast cancer-specific mortality to nonusers (HR = 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.88, 1.08). There was no evidence of a dose-response relationship. We found similar associations for specific CCBs, and for all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large population-based breast cancer cohort, we did not find any evidence that CCB use is associated with increased mortality.