Bone sarcoma incidence in the Netherlands

Tracked ultrasound registration for intraoperative navigation during pediatric bone tumor resections with soft tissue components: a porcine cadaver study

PURPOSE

Resection of pediatric osteosarcoma in the extremities with soft tissue involvement presents surgical challenges due to difficult visualization and palpation of the tumor. Therefore, an adequate image-guided surgery (IGS) system is required for more accurate tumor resection. The use of a 3D model in combination with intraoperative tracked ultrasound (iUS) may enhance surgical decision making. This study evaluates the clinical feasibility of iUS as a surgical tool using a porcine cadaver model.

METHODS

First, a 3D model of the porcine lower limb was created based on preoperative scans. Second, the bone surface of the tibia was automatically detected with an iUS by a sweep on the skin. The bone surface of the preoperative 3D model was then matched with the bone surface detected by the iUS. Ten artificial targets were used to calculate the target registration error (TRE). Intraoperative performance of iUS IGS was evaluated by six pediatric surgeons and two pediatric oncologic orthopedists. Finally, user experience was assessed with a post-procedural questionnaire.

RESULTS

Eight registration procedures were performed with a mean TRE of 6.78 ± 1.33 mm. The surgeons agreed about the willingness for clinical implementation in their current clinical practice. They mentioned the additional clinical value of iUS in combination with the 3D model for the localization of the soft tissue components of the tumor. The concept of the proposed IGS system is considered feasible by the clinical panel, but the large TRE and degree of automation need to be addressed in further work.

CONCLUSION

The participating pediatric surgeons and orthopedists were convinced of the clinical value of the interaction between the iUS and the 3D model. Further research is required to improve the surgical accuracy and degree of automation of iUS-based registration systems for the surgical management of pediatric osteosarcoma.

The national incidence of chondrosarcoma of bone; a review

BACKGROUND

Chondrosarcoma (CS) epidemiology has been studied by a number of authors using national cancer registry cohorts. Many reports share the common findings of a slight increase in incidence, but not all. The patterns and causes for these changes are divergent while reflection concerning methodological challenges are often missing.

METHOD

We have performed a structured literature review to find national analyses of CS incidence published from 2010 to 2020. We included eight studies of national incidence of CS, summarise their findings and patterns of change. We further discuss explanations given for these changes to better understand the real patterns and raise awareness in their interpretation.

RESULTS

Reported crude incidence ranges from 0.27 per million per year overall in Saudi Arabia to 5.4 in the Netherlands. Four studies from the USA, England, Switzerland and France report age standardised rates of 2.0-4.1 per million per year overall. While some countries report stable patterns, most report a slight increase. The Netherlands is the only country reporting a large increase, driven by a 10-fold increase in the incidence of ACT/grade 1 CS during the study period. We challenge the explanations given for this and suggest that this most likely is a result of variable interpretation and definition of CS at the lower levels of disease aggressiveness. This should raise awareness to possible over-treatment of CS in the Netherlands.

CONCLUSION

The most likely national incidence of CS of bone is between 2-4 per million per year. Three modern reports present an incidence of 3.4-4.1 per million per year.

A retrospective case-control study for the comparison of 5-year survival rates: the role of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in craniofacial bone sarcoma in adults

Background

The impact of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of craniofacial bone sarcomas has not been clarified. This study aimed to assess whether survival outcomes differed between patients who underwent adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

A retrospective search for adult patients diagnosed with malignant neoplasms of the craniofacial bones (International Classification of Diseases 10 codes C41.0-C41.1), within the past 20 years from the access date 28 April 2022, was conducted using the TriNetX network (TriNetX, Cambridge, MA, USA). Cohort I included patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy and cohort II included patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A refined search for individuals that received common chemotherapeutic agents, such as methotrexate, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and/or ifosfamide, was conducted and patients were assigned to cohort A (adjuvant chemotherapy) and cohort B (neoadjuvant chemotherapy). Following matching for age and sex, Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed, and risk ratio, odds ratio (OR), and hazard ratio were calculated.

Results

Patients were assigned to two cohorts, with 181 patients each after matching. In cohorts I and II, 55 and 41 patients died, respectively. No significant differences were found between the two cohorts regarding the 5-year survival probability (I: 59.87% versus II: 68.45%; p = 0.076; log-rank test), or the risk of dying (I: 0.304 versus II: 0.227; risk difference: 0.077; p = 0.096). The risk analysis before matching for age and sex showed a significant survival benefit in cohort II (OR: 1.586; p = 0.0295; risk difference: 0.093). After a refined query to identify patients treated with methotrexate, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and/or ifosfamide, the two cohorts included 47 patients, respectively. In cohort A (adjuvant chemotherapy), 19 patients died, whereas 12 patients died in cohort B (neoadjuvant chemotherapy) within 5 years after diagnosis. Further analysis indicated a greater survival in cohort B, but the survival probability between the cohorts did not differ significantly (A: 43.55% versus B: 54.49%; p = 0.171).

Conclusion

The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy may improve survival rates in patients with surgically treated craniofacial bone sarcomas. Due to the retrospective nature of this study, randomized controlled studies are required to derive treatment recommendations.

Risk of venous thromboembolism and major bleeding in the clinical course of osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with osteosarcoma (OS) and Ewing sarcoma (ES) are considered to have a high venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk, although the exact incidence and prognostic impact are under-researched in general as well as in relevant age groups.

AIMS

To study the impact of VTE and major bleeding (MB) in OS and ES patients, subdivided in children, Adolescents Young Adults (AYAs; aged 18-39) and older adults.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center chart review in 519 OS and 165 ES patients treated between 1980 and 2018. Patients were followed from sarcoma diagnosis until an outcome of interest (VTE, MB) or death occurred. Cumulative incidences were estimated with death as competing risk. Cox models were used to determine prognostic impact.

RESULTS

Five-year cumulative incidences of VTE were 12 % (95%CI 9.1-15) for OS and 6.7 % (95%CI 3.5-11) for ES patients, mostly happening in patients ≥18 years; the most frequent VTE presentation was catheter-related upper-extremity thrombosis (OS: 18/65, ES: 7/11). Five-year cumulative incidences for MB were 5.8 % (95%CI 4.0-8.1) in OS and 5.4 % (95%CI 2.5-9.8) in ES patients. 192 OS and 77 ES AYAs were included, who faced similar VTE and MB incidences as older adults. In OS, VTE and MB were both associated with mortality (adjusted HRs 2.0 [95%CI 1.4-2.9] and 2.4 [95%CI 1.4-4.0], respectively), whereas in ES this association was only present for MB (aHR 3.4 [95%CI 1.2-9.6]).

CONCLUSIONS

VTE is a frequent complication in adult OS and to a lesser extent in ES patients, while the rate of MB was comparably high in both sarcoma types.

Bone sarcoma follow-up; a nationwide analysis of oncological events after initial treatment

Aim

Follow-up strategies for high-grade bone sarcomas have been optimized to facilitate early detection of local recurrence and distant metastasis. The ideology is that early detection enables early treatment presuming better survival. However, the clinical value for each individual patient remains questionable. This study aims to evaluate oncological events after initial treatment in order to assess current follow-up strategies for high-grade bone sarcomas in the Netherlands.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on a national registry. All cases were retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Our study consisted of 393 patients treated between 2007 and 2011 with complete follow-up data. Baseline characteristics were analysed for all entities. Local recurrence and distant metastasis was analysed along with overall survival for high-grade chondrosarcoma, high-grade osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma and chordoma.

Results

Median follow-up was 8,3 years for high-grade chondrosarcoma, 4,9 for high-grade osteosarcoma, 3,8 for Ewing sarcoma and 7,5 for chordoma. Median time to local recurrence and distant metastasis was 1,2 years for high-grade osteosarcoma and 1,5 years for Ewing sarcoma. For high-grade osteosarcoma with localized disease at presentation, 0.09 new distant metastatic events per patient per year were seen after five years of follow-up with 11,1 patients needed to follow-up for any event. Five-year overall survival was 60,0% for high-grade chondrosarcoma, 50,0% for high-grade osteosarcoma, 45,3% for Ewing sarcoma and 71,4% for chordoma.

Conclusions

This nationwide study shows a plateau in local recurrences and distant metastatic events after four years of treatment for patients with high-grade osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. Due to a lack of reliable evidence however, we were not able to provide additional guidance on follow-up intervals and duration. Collaborative research with larger groups is needed in order to provide a solid scientific recommendation for follow-up in the heterogenous patient population with bone sarcoma.

The perplexing role of immuno-oncology drugs in osteosarcoma

•

Osteosarcoma outcomes have not improved since use of cytotoxic chemotherapy.

•

Addition of macrophage activators and interferon have been disappointing.

•

Combination therapies may be needed to exploit the role of the immune system.

Osteosarcoma is a rare, primary tumour of bone. Curative treatment consists of multi-agent chemotherapy and complete surgical resection. Despite the use of multi-agent chemotherapy, the risk of recurrence is high. Survival outcomes for patients with osteosarcoma have not changed since the 1980′s. Based on biologic rationale, there has been interest in adding immunotherapies to upfront curative intent chemotherapy, including mifamurtide (a macrophage activator) and interferon. However, results to date have been disappointing. In the metastatic setting, checkpoint inhibitors alone have not proven effective. Ongoing translational work is needed to further understand which patients may benefit from immune-oncology approaches with standard cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Metformin and primary bone cancer risk in Taiwanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

The effect of metformin on primary bone cancer risk has not been researched. This retrospective cohort study investigated the risk of primary bone cancer between metformin initiators and non-metformin initiators in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

A total of 673,532 patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus and had been prescribed antidiabetic drugs for 2 or more times during 1999-2009 were enrolled from Taiwan's National Health Insurance. Metformin initiators and non-metformin initiators were defined according to the prescriptions of antidiabetic drugs within the initial 12 months. The patients were then followed up until December 31, 2011 for the incidence of primary bone cancer. Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment-weighting using propensity scores was used to estimate hazard ratios in intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses.

RESULTS

In the intention-to-treat analysis, the respective incidence rates were 10.56 and 12.90 per 100,000 person-years in 453,532 metformin initiators and 220,000 non-metformin initiators and the hazard ratio for initiators versus non-initiators was 0.830 (95% confidence interval 0.686-1.004, P-value = 0.0551). In the per-protocol analysis, the incidence rates were 7.58 and 11.77 per 100,000 person-years, respectively, and the hazard ratio was 0.615 (95% confidence interval 0.468-0.808, P-value = 0.0005). Subgroup analyses with regards to sex and age (<60 and ≥60 years) showed that the significantly lower risk associated with metformin use was only observed in men aged ≥60 years in the per-protocol analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

A significantly lower risk of primary bone cancer can be observed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who adhere to metformin treatment. This benefit can only be observed in men aged ≥60 years.

The rare primary bone sarcomas: imaging-pathological correlation

Rare primary bone sarcomas are challenging entities both radiologically and pathologically. These include the diagnoses of spindle cell sarcoma (leiomyosarcoma, fibrosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor), pleomorphic liposarcoma, and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. The radiographic and cross-sectional imaging features of each of these tumors are presented, along with current key pathological concepts. Frequently non-specific, the radiological appearances must be correlated with all clinical and pathological information available to enable an accurate diagnosis.

Differences in health care experiences between rare cancer and common cancer patients: results from a national cross-sectional survey

Background

Patients with rare cancers face challenges in the diagnostic and treatment phase, and in access to clinical expertise. Since studies on health care experiences of these patients in comparison to patients with more common cancers are scarce, we aimed to explore these differences.

Methods

Data were cross-sectionally collected among (former) adult cancer patients through a national online survey in the Netherlands (October 2019). Descriptive statistics were reported and subgroups (rare vs. common patients) were compared.

Results

In total, 7343 patients (i.e., 1856 rare and 5487 common cancer patients) participated. Rare cancer patients were more often diagnosed and treated in different hospitals compared to common cancer patients (67% vs. 59%, p < 0.001). Rare cancer patients received treatment more often in a single hospital (60% vs. 57%, p = 0.014), but reported more negative experiences when treated in multiple hospitals than common cancer patients (14% vs. 9%, p < 0.001). They also more often received advise from their physician about the hospital to go to for a second opinion (50% vs. 36%, p < 0.001), were more likely to choose a hospital specialized in their cancer type (33% vs. 22%, p < 0.001), and were more willing to travel as long as necessary to receive specialized care than common cancer patients (55% vs. 47%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Rare and common cancer patients differ in their health care experiences. Health care for rare cancer patients can be further improved by proper referral to centers of expertise and building a clinical network specifically for rare cancers.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-021-01886-2.

Long-term patient-reported outcome measures following limb salvage with complex reconstruction or amputation in the treatment of upper extremity sarcoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study compares long-term patient-reported outcomes between patients that underwent limb-salvage surgery with complex reconstruction by free or pedicled flap (LS) or amputation. Additionally, the need for revision surgery is compared.

METHODS

A total of 43 patients were studied at a median follow-up of 9.54 years. Sixteen patients completed questionnaires regarding functional outcome and mental wellbeing. Functional outcomes were measured by using the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), QuickDASH, and PROMIS Upper Extremity instruments. Mental wellbeing was assessed using the PROMIS Anxiety and Depression instruments. Revision surgery was assessed for the entire follow-up.

RESULTS

The median TESS scores were 96.0 versus 71.7 (p = 0.034) and the PROMIS Upper Extremity scores were 50.1 versus 40.3 (p = 0.039) for the LS and amputation cohorts, respectively. No significant difference was found regarding symptoms of anxiety (52.7 vs. 53.8; p = 0.587) or depression (52.0 vs. 50.5; p = 0.745). Of the patients in the LS cohort 51.6% required at least one reoperation compared to 8.33% in the amputation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

LS surgery maintains functional benefits over amputation after almost a decade of follow-up. Still, mental wellbeing seems to be comparable between these patients, whereas LS procedures are associated with a sixfold increased need for reoperations.

Primary bone sarcomas in KSA: A Saudi tumor registry review

Objectives

The geographical incidence of tumours is usually influenced by the environment, race, and culture. This study aimed to report the incidence and differences in tumour type, site of origin, and mortality across gender, regions, age, and the different characteristics of tumour types.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included all patients diagnosed with primary bone sarcomas from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2017. Frequencies and percentages were generated for categorical variables. Means and standard deviations were calculated for quantitative variables. A chi-squared test was used to detect differences among categorical variables. Student-t, ANOVA, and Tukey tests were used to detect differences among quantitative variables. Lastly, we calculated the incidence of each tumour type.

Results

Of 451 patients, 248 (55%) had osteosarcomas; 160 (35.5%) had Ewing's sarcoma, and 43 (9.5%) had chondrosarcoma. The incidence was 1.56 cases per 1,000,000 per year for osteosarcoma, 0.95 cases per 1,000,000 per year for Ewing's sarcoma, and 0.27 cases per million per year for chondrosarcoma. The three-year survival rate was 82.30%. Significant differences in tumour type, origin site, and three-year survival across age and gender were detected. Similarly, significant differences were also noted in origin site, grade, basis of diagnosis, and lateralisation across tumour types.

Conclusions

In our study, the observed bone sarcoma incidence rates were lower than the ones reported worldwide. Understanding the pattern of tumour behaviour in the region will help develop a risk and response-based treatment plan for early decision-making.

Epidemiology of Soft Tissue Sarcoma and Bone Sarcoma inItaly: Analysis of Data from 15 Population-Based Cancer Registries

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of rare cancers of mesenchymal origin. In this study, we provide updated, world age-standardised incidence rate (ASR) and European age-standardised incidence rate for malignant soft tissue sarcoma (ICD-O-3 topographic code C47–C49) and bone sarcoma (C40, C41) in Italy, by area (north, centre, and south) and by cancer registry. We also assess morphology in relation to site and area and assess metastases at diagnosis. We analysed 1,112 cases, with incidence 2009–2012, provided by 15 cancer registries (CRs) affiliated to the Association of Italian Cancer Registries (AIRTUM). Overall, ASR was 1.7/100,000/year for soft tissue sarcoma and 0.7 for bone sarcoma. Central Italy had the highest (2.4) ASR and south Italy had the lowest (1.6) ASR for soft tissue sarcoma. Central Italy had the highest (1.1) ASR and north Italy had the lowest (0.7) ASR for bone sarcoma. By CR, ASRs ranged from 1.1 to 2.6 for soft tissue sarcoma and from 0 to 1.4 for bone sarcoma. The most frequent soft tissue sarcomas were sarcoma not otherwise specified (NOS) (29.4%) and liposarcoma (22.2%); the most common bone sarcoma was chondrosarcoma (37.6%). Soft tissue sarcomas occurred most frequently (35.6%) in lower limb connective tissue; bone sarcomas arose mainly (68.8%) in long bones. The frequencies of morphologies arising at different sites varied considerably by Italian area; for example, 20% of hemangiosarcomas occurred in the head and neck in south Italy with 17% at this site in the centre and 6% in the north. For soft tissue sarcoma, the highest ASRs of 2.6 and 2.4 contrast with the lowest ASRs 1.1 and 1.3, suggesting high-risk hot spots that deserve further investigation. The marked variations in morphology distribution with site and geography suggest geographic variation in risk factors that may also repay further investigation particularly since sarcoma etiology is poorly understood.

Follow-Up in Bone Sarcoma Care: A Cross-Sectional European Study

Background

Follow-up of high-grade bone sarcoma patients with repeated radiological imaging aims at early detection of recurrent disease or distant metastasis. Repeated radiological imaging does expose (mostly young) patients to ionising radiation. At this point, it is not known whether frequent follow-up increases overall survival. Additionally, frequent follow-up subjects patients and families to psychological stress. This study aims to assess follow-up procedures in terms of frequency and type of imaging modalities in bone tumour centres across Europe for comparison and improvement of knowledge as a first step towards a more uniform approach towards bone sarcoma follow-up.

Methods

Data were obtained through analysis of several follow-up protocols and a digital questionnaire returned by EMSOS members of bone tumour centres all across Europe.

Results

All participating bone tumour centres attained a minimum follow-up period of ten years. National guidelines revealed variations in follow-up intervals and use of repeated imaging with ionising radiation. A local and a chest X-ray were obtained at 47.6% of the responding clinics at every follow-up patient visit.

Conclusions

Variations were seen among European bone sarcoma centres with regards to follow-up intervals and use of repeated imaging. The majority of these expert centres follow existing international guidelines and find them sufficient as basis for a follow-up surveillance programme despite lack of evidence. Future research should aim towards evidence-based follow-up with focus on the effects of follow-up strategies on health outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and individualised follow-up algorithms.

Organization of Bone Sarcoma Care: A Cross-Sectional European Study

Objective

To assess organization of care in several bone sarcoma centers in Europe affiliated with the European Musculoskeletal Oncology Society (EMSOS) for comparison and to identify potential improvements in organization of care.

Methods

Data for this observational cross‐sectional study was obtained through healthcare professionals affiliated to EMSOS. The authors formulated 10 questions regarding organization of care. The questions were focused on guidance, multidisciplinary decision‐making, and data storage. A digital questionnaire was synthesized and included quality control. The digital questionnaire was sent to 54 representative members of EMSOS. We did not receive responses from 29 representative countries (53.7%) after one digital invitation and two digital reminders.

Results

We received data from 25 representatives of bone sarcoma centers from 17 countries across Europe (46.3%). Authorization to perform oncological care in a bone sarcoma center was government issued in 41.2% of cases and based on expertise without governmental influence in 52.9% of cases. In 64.7% of the countries, a national bone tumor guideline regarding for diagnosis and treatment is used in oncological care. A national bone tumor board for extensive case evaluation including classification and advice for treatment is available for 47.1% of the countries. All participating bone sarcoma centers have a mandatory local multidisciplinary meeting before the start of treatment; in 84.0% this meeting takes place once a week. During this multidisciplinary meeting a median of 15 cases (range, 4–40 cases) are discussed. In terms of storage of oncological data, a local registry is used in eight countries (47.1%). A national registry is used in eight countries (47.1%).

Conclusions

A national bone tumor board gives bone sarcoma centers with little adherence the opportunity to gain knowledge from a more experienced team. Centralization of care in a bone sarcoma center is important to lower incidences. The optimal size for a bone sarcoma center in terms of patient adherence is not known at present.

Alantolactone suppresses human osteosarcoma through the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway

Osteosarcoma is the most common type of malignant bone cancer and results in cancer-related deaths among adolescents. Alantolactone (ALT) demonstrates antitumor properties in various diseases; however, its potential role in osteosarcoma is relatively unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of ALT on osteosarcoma. ALT significantly decreased the viability of U2OS and HOS osteosarcoma cell lines. Cells flow cytometry assay and Hoechst 33258 staining assay revealed that ALT significantly increased the proportion of apoptotic U2OS cells. In addition, wound healing and Transwell invasion assays demonstrated that the invasion and migration of osteosarcoma were markedly reduced upon ALT treatment. It was hypothesized that the antitumor functions of ALT are mediated through inhibition of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. In conclusion, the results of the present study confirmed the inhibition of ALT on osteosarcoma cells via downregulation of PI3K/AKT signaling pathways, suggesting ALT as a potential therapeutic candidate for osteosarcoma.

Oncological and endoprosthetic outcomes of bone sarcoma patients: a nationwide cohort study

PURPOSE

To retrospectively analyze the entire cohort of patients in the Republic of Slovenia diagnosed with bone sarcomas in the long bones or pelvis/sacrum/coccyx from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2018, with an observational nationwide study, whereby all patients were evaluated by one single tumor board in the country. We evaluated surgical outcomes and tested whether survival of bone sarcoma patients depended on age, gender, histological diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cancer Registry of the Republic of Slovenia was screened for all ICD-10 diagnoses from C40.0 to C40.9 and C41.4 in the designated time frame, and the patients were then clinically followed up until the end of the observation period on June 1, 2019.

RESULTS

The cohort of 160 patients was treated surgically in 141 cases, 29 patients required subsequent revision(s) and cumulative endoprosthetic infection rate was 12.5%. In the follow-up, 54 patients died and the 2 patients were missing. Cumulative proportion of survival at 5/10 years was 61%/54%, respectively. After adjustment for age, gender and diagnosis, higher age (odds ratio 1.06 for each additional year), osteosarcoma (odds ratio 4.07) and Ewing sarcoma (odds ratio 11.68) were the significant risk factors of shorter oncological survival.

CONCLUSION

This is the first Slovenian nationwide cohort study of bone sarcoma patients, unique in its circumscribed geographic area and evaluation/treatment at a single center by a single tumor board. Although comparable to other countries, results show a grim picture and the lack of improvement in bone sarcoma survival within the last 20 years.