Predictors of Acute Renal Dysfunction After Ventricular Assist Device Placement

Major adverse kidney events predict reduced survival in ventricular assist device supported patients

AIMS

There is limited data describing major adverse kidney events (MAKE) in patients supported with ventricular assist devices (VAD). We aim to describe the association between MAKE and survival, risk factors for MAKE, and renal trajectory in VAD supported patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a single-centre retrospective analysis of consecutive VAD implants between 2010 and 2019. Baseline demographics, biochemistry, and adverse events were collected for the duration of VAD support. MAKE was defined as the first event to occur of sustained drop (>50%) in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), progression to stage V chronic kidney disease, initiation or continuation of renal replacement therapy beyond implant admission or death on renal replacement therapy at any time. One-hundred and seventy-three patients were included, median age 56.8 years, 18.5% female, INTERMACS profile 1 or 2 in 75.1%. Thirty-seven patients experienced MAKE. On multivariate analysis, post-implant clinical right ventricular failure and the presence of chronic haemolysis, defined by the presence of schistocytes on blood film analysis, were significantly associated with increased risk of MAKE (adjusted odds ratio 9.88, P < 0.001 and adjusted odds ratio 3.33, P = 0.006, respectively). MAKE was associated with reduced survival (hazard ratio 4.80, P < 0.001). Patients who died or experienced MAKE did not demonstrate the expected transient 3-month improvement in eGFR, seen in other cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

MAKE significantly impacts survival. In our cohort, MAKE was predicted by post-implant right ventricular failure and chronic haemolysis. The lack of early eGFR improvement on VAD support may indicate higher risk for MAKE.

Physiology of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy

The expanding use of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) for end-stage heart failure warrants familiarity with the physiologic interaction of the device with the native circulation. Contemporary devices utilize predominantly centrifugal flow and, to a lesser extent, axial flow rotors that vary with respect to their intrinsic flow characteristics. Flow can be manipulated with adjustments to preload and afterload as in the native heart, and ascertainment of the predicted effects is provided by differential pressure-flow (H-Q) curves or loops. Valvular heart disease, especially aortic regurgitation, may significantly affect adequacy of mechanical support. In contrast, atrioventricular and ventriculoventricular timing is of less certain significance. Although beneficial effects of device therapy are typically seen due to enhanced distal perfusion, unloading of the left ventricle and atrium, and amelioration of secondary pulmonary hypertension, negative effects of CF-LVAD therapy on right ventricular filling and function, through right-sided loading and septal interaction, can make optimization challenging. Additionally, a lack of pulsatile energy provided by CF-LVAD therapy has physiologic consequences for end-organ function and may be responsible for a series of adverse effects. Rheological effects of intravascular pumps, especially shear stress exposure, result in platelet activation and hemolysis, which may result in both thrombotic and hemorrhagic consequences. Development of novel solutions for untoward device-circulatory interactions will facilitate hemodynamic support while mitigating adverse events. © 2021 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 12:1-37, 2021.

Heart, kidney and left ventricular assist device: a complex trio

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is a complex syndrome affecting the whole body, kidneys included. The left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a valid option for patients with very severe HF. Focusing on renal function, LVAD implantation could theoretically reverse the detrimental effects of HF syndrome on kidneys. However, implanting an LVAD is a high-risk surgical procedure, and LVAD patients have higher risk of bleeding, device thrombosis, strokes, renal impairment, multi-organ failure and infections. Furthermore, an LVAD has its own particular effects on the renal system.

METHODS

In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the complex interaction between LVAD and the kidneys from the pathophysiological and clinical perspectives. An analysis of the different effects of pulsatile-flow and continuous-flow LVAD is provided.

RESULTS

Despite their limitations, creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) formulas help to stratify patients by their post-LVAD placement prognosis. Poor basal renal function, the onset of acute kidney injury or the need for renal replacement therapy after LVAD implantation negatively influences a patient's prognosis. LVAD can also prompt an improvement in renal function, however, with some counterintuitive effects on a patient's prognosis.

CONCLUSION

It is still hard to say whether different trends in eGFR depend on different renal conditions before LVAD placement, on a patient's better overall status or on a particular patient management strategy before and/or after the device's implantation. Steps should be taken to solve this question because finding the best candidates for LVAD implantation is of paramount importance to ensure the best outcomes.

Recovery after acute kidney injury requiring kidney replacement therapy in patients with left ventricular assist device: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and severe complication after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation with an incidence of 37%; 13% of which require kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Severe AKI requiring KRT (AKI-KRT) in LVAD patients is associated with high short and long-term mortality compared with AKI without KRT. While kidney function recovery is associated with better outcomes, its incidence is unclear among LVAD patients with severe AKI requiring KRT.

AIM

To identify studies evaluating the recovery rates from severe AKI-KRT after LVAD placement, which is defined by regained kidney function resulting in the discontinuation of KRT. Random-effects and generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian-Laird were used to combine the effect estimates obtained from individual studies.

METHODS

A total of 268 patients from 14 cohort studies that reported severe AKI-KRT after LVAD were included. Follow-up time ranged anywhere from two weeks of LVAD implantation to 12 mo. Kidney recovery occurred in 78% of enrollees at the time of hospital discharge or within 30 d. Overall, the pooled estimated AKI recovery rate among patients with severe AKI-KRT was 50.5% (95%CI: 34.0%-67.0%) at 12 mo follow up. Majority (85%) of patients used continuous-flow LVAD. While the data on pulsatile-flow LVAD was limited, subgroup analysis of continuous-flow LVAD demonstrated that pooled estimated AKI recovery rate among patients with severe AKI-KRT was 52.1% (95%CI: 36.8%-67.0%). Meta-regression analysis did not show a significant association between study year and AKI recovery rate (P = 0.08). There was no publication bias as assessed by the funnel plot and Egger's regression asymmetry test in all analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 268 patients from 14 cohort studies that reported severe AKI-KRT after LVAD were included. Follow-up time ranged anywhere from two weeks of LVAD implantation to 12 mo. Kidney recovery occurred in 78% of enrollees at the time of hospital discharge or within 30 d. Overall, the pooled estimated AKI recovery rate among patients with severe AKI-KRT was 50.5% (95%CI: 34.0%-67.0%) at 12 mo follow up. Majority (85%) of patients used continuous-flow LVAD. While the data on pulsatile-flow LVAD was limited, subgroup analysis of continuous-flow LVAD demonstrated that pooled estimated AKI recovery rate among patients with severe AKI-KRT was 52.1% (95%CI: 36.8%-67.0%). Meta-regression analysis did not show a significant association between study year and AKI recovery rate (P = 0.08). There was no publication bias as assessed by the funnel plot and Egger's regression asymmetry test in all analyses.

CONCLUSION

Recovery from severe AKI-KRT after LVAD occurs approximately 50.5%, and it has not significantly changed over the years despite advances in medicine.

Trends, Outcomes, and Readmissions Among Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients with Acute Kidney Injury Requiring Hemodialysis

Although renal function may improve after left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) implantation, acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring hemodialysis (HD) therapy can occur postoperatively. We used data from the National Readmissions Database to calculate annual rates of in-hospital outcomes and readmissions among patients who underwent implantation and developed acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring hemodialysis (HD) for years 2012-2015. We identified 178 (weighted 469) patients with AKI requiring HD after LVAD implantation. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher among LVAD recipients who required HD for AKI compared with those who did not (42.38% vs. 8.38%, p < 0.001). Rates of in-hospital mortality (from 52.1% in 2012 to 33.9% in 2014, p = 0.046) and length of stay (from 60.3 days in 2012 to 47.1 days in 2014, p = 0.003) decreased significantly, whereas there was a trend toward reduced hospital cost (from $320,414 in 2012 to $267,285 in 2014, p = 0.076) during the study period. However, postoperative bleeding increased significantly (p = 0.01). Acute kidney injury requiring HD after implantation was not associated with significantly higher rates of readmissions compared with LVAD recipients without AKI on HD, after adjustment for clinical and hospital characteristics (41.4% vs. 30.5%; odds ratio 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-1.95; P = 0.239). However, 5.42% of these patients required maintenance hemodialysis in readmissions. In-hospital mortality and length of stay are decreasing but remain unacceptably high in patients requiring HD for AKI after LVAD implantation but remain higher than LVAD recipients without AKI on HD. A minority of these patients who survive hospital discharge require maintenance hemodialysis.

Incidence and impact of acute kidney injury on patients with implantable left ventricular assist devices: a Meta-analysis

Background: We aimed to evaluate the acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence and its associated risk of mortality in patients with implantable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD).Methods: A systematic literature search in Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Databases was conducted through January 2020 to identify studies that provided data on the AKI incidence and AKI-associated mortality risk in adult patients with implantable LVADs. Pooled effect estimates were examined using random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian-Laird.Results: Fifty-six cohort studies with 63,663 LVAD patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of reported AKI was 24.9% (95%CI: 20.1%-30.4%) but rose to 36.9% (95%CI: 31.1%-43.1%) when applying the standard definition of AKI per RIFLE, AKIN, and KDIGO criteria. The pooled incidence of severe AKI requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) was 12.6% (95%CI: 10.5%-15.0%). AKI incidence did not differ significantly between types of LVAD (p = .35) or indication for LVAD use (p = .62). While meta-regression analysis did not demonstrate a significant association between study year and overall AKI incidence (p = .55), the study year was negatively correlated with the incidence of severe AKI requiring RRT (slope = -0.068, p < .001). The pooled odds ratios (ORs) of mortality at 30 days and one year in AKI patients were 3.66 (95% CI, 2.00-6.70) and 2.22 (95% CI, 1.62-3.04), respectively. The pooled ORs of mortality at 30 days and one year in severe AKI patients requiring RRT were 7.52 (95% CI, 4.58-12.33) and 5.41 (95% CI, 3.63-8.06), respectively.Conclusion: We found that more than one-third of LVAD patients develop AKI based on standard definitions, and 13% develop severe AKI requiring RRT. There has been a potential improvement in the incidence of severe AKI requiring RRT for LVAD patients. AKI in LVAD patients was associated with increased 30-day and 1 year mortality.

Risk of Liver Dysfunction After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

BACKGROUND

Incident liver dysfunction after left ventricular assist device implantation has been previously associated with adverse outcomes, yet data on perioperative risk markers are sparse.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients undergoing continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implant between 2007 and 2017 at a single institution. Perioperative variables were evaluated by univariate modeling and adjusted for false discovery rate. Variables most significantly associated with incident Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support-defined liver dysfunction (INT-LD) were evaluated using logistic regression and optimal cutpoints were defined. One-year survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

We included 359 patients (79% male; mean age 59 ± 13 years; 46% ischemic; 64% destination therapy). Lower right ventricular stroke work index at the time of right heart catheterization, higher right atrial pressure 6 hours after right heart catheterization, higher preoperative total bilirubin, longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, and greater volume of intraoperative ultrafiltration were most strongly associated with incident INT-LD (adjusted P < .01 for each). Initial right ventricular stroke work index less than 460 mm Hg∗mL/m2 (odds ratio [OR] 4.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3 to 9.4), 6-hour right heart catheterization 14 mm Hg or greater (OR 4.3; 95% CI, 2.1 to 8.8), cardiopulmonary bypass time longer than 137 minutes (OR 3.3; 95% CI, 1.8 to 6.2; P < .01 for all), ultrafiltration more than 2.95 L (OR 3.7; 95% CI, 2 to 6.8), and total bilirubin greater than 1.4 mg/dL (OR 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4 to 5) were each strongly associated with risk of INT-LD, which was associated with decreased unadjusted 1-year survival (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Right ventricular stroke work index, right heart catheterization, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and ultrafiltration were each more strongly associated with elevated risk of INT-LD after left ventricular assist device implant than total bilirubin. Therefore, optimization of right ventricular hemodynamics and minimizing cardiopulmonary bypass time and ultrafiltration could potentially reduce the risk of liver dysfunction, but these observations require prospective validation.

Evolution of pediatric ventricular assist devices and their neurologic and renal complications-A 24-year single-center experience

Utilization of ventricular assist devices (VADs) in adult populations with severe heart failure as a bridge to transplant has become the standard of care over the past two decades. Analogously, the use of VADs in pediatric populations has become more commonplace as pediatric heart transplantation has become more prevalent. We still have much to learn, however, about the complications after VAD placement in pediatric patients, their impact on transplantation and, in particular, how outcomes have changed over time. The objectives of this study were to (a) review the experience of a single pediatric VAD center, (b) identify risk factors that could lead to poor outcomes in patients on the transplant waitlist after VAD implantation and (c) demonstrate changes in outcomes over time. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed comparing death as a primary outcome and stroke and acute kidney injury (AKI) as secondary outcomes, across the study period divided into three timed eras. We analyzed 88 patients supported by a VAD over a 24-year timeframe. The duration, age at implant and indication for VAD support did not change significantly across the eras. We found that the incidence of stroke decreased over the study period and, while the rates of AKI did not change over the study period, those who developed AKI, while supported on VAD, had an increased risk of death.

Outcomes after left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with acute kidney injury

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to compare outcomes for patients with and without acute kidney injury during hospitalizations when left ventricular assist devices are implanted.

METHODS

By using the National Inpatient Sample from 2008 to 2013, we identified patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision procedure code for left ventricular assist device implantation (37.66). We ascertained the presence of acute kidney injury and acute kidney injury requiring dialysis using validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. We used logistic regression to examine the association of nondialysis-requiring acute kidney injury and acute kidney injury requiring dialysis with mortality, procedural complications, and discharge destination.

RESULTS

We identified 8362 patients who underwent left ventricular assist device implantation, of whom 3760 (45.0%) experienced nondialysis-requiring acute kidney injury and 426 (5.1%) experienced acute kidney injury requiring dialysis. In-hospital mortality was 3.9% for patients without acute kidney injury, 12.2% for patients with nondialysis-requiring acute kidney injury, and 47.4% for patients with acute kidney injury requiring dialysis. Patients with nondialysis-requiring acute kidney injury and acute kidney injury requiring dialysis had higher adjusted odds of mortality (3.24, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.04-5.13 and 20.8, 95% CI, 9.7-44.2), major bleeding (1.38, 95% CI, 1.08-1.77 and 2.44, 95% CI, 1.47-4.04), sepsis (2.69, 95% CI, 1.93-3.75 and 5.75, 95% CI, 3.46-9.56), and discharge to a nursing facility (2.15, 95% CI, 1.51-3.07 and 5.89, 95% CI, 2.67-12.99).

CONCLUSIONS

More than 1 in 10 patients with acute kidney injury and approximately 1 in 2 patients with acute kidney injury requiring dialysis died during their hospitalization, with only 30% of patients with acute kidney injury requiring dialysis discharged to home. This information is necessary to support shared decision-making for patients with advanced heart failure and acute kidney injury.

Biomarkers of Inflammation, Fibrosis, and Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Heart Failure with and without Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Renal dysfunction or renal failure is a common complication in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients and is associated with reduced survival. To date, serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are used for the evaluation of kidney function. However, serum creatinine and GFR have limitations. The objective of our study is to assess the levels of kidney biomarkers in LVAD recipients compared to heart failure patients and healthy controls and to examine their association with conventional clinical biomarkers.

METHODS

The biomarkers neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), and adiponectin were assessed in 51 participants: 19 heart failure patients, 16 LVAD recipients, and 16 healthy controls. Linear regressions were performed to assess whether demographic and clinical variables predict the levels of biomarkers that are associated with acute kidney injury and the risk of chronic kidney disease.

RESULTS

The levels of NGAL and adiponectin were higher in LVAD recipients and patients with heart failure as compared with healthy controls. The levels of PAI-1 and KIM-1 were not elevated in LVAD recipients. The results of linear regression analysis indicated that when controlling for the effect of CRP and BNP, 40.1% of the variance in NGAL levels can be explained by GFR (R2 = 0.401, F = 5.56, p = 0.005), while CRP can explain 35.3% of the variance in adiponectin levels (R2 = 0.353, F = 4.55, p = 0.01), when controlling for the effect of BNP and GFR.

CONCLUSIONS

The levels of NGAL and adiponectin were augmented in LVAD recipients, suggesting that renal functions were not restored with circulatory support. Larger studies should assess the predictability of these biomarkers of renal dysfunction in LVAD recipients.

Outcomes of Moderate-to-Severe Acute Kidney Injury following Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

BACKGROUND

Although acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication following cardiac surgery, less is known about the occurrence and consequences of moderate/severe AKI following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.

METHODS

All patients who had an LVAD implanted at our center from 2008 to 2016 were reviewed to determine the incidence of, and risk factors for, moderate/severe (stage 2/3) AKI and to compare postoperative complications and mortality rates between those with and those without moderate/severe AKI.

RESULTS

Of 246 patients, 68 (28%) developed moderate/severe AKI. A multivariable logistic regression comprising body mass index and prior sternotomy had fair predictive ability (area under the curve = 0.71). A 1-unit increase in body mass index increased the risk of moderate/severe AKI by 7% (odds ratio = 1.07; 95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.11); a prior sternotomy increased the risk more than 3-fold (odds ratio = 3.4; 95% confidence interval: 1.84-6.43). The group of patients with moderate/severe AKI had higher rates of respiratory failure and death than the group of patients with mild/no AKI. Patients with moderate/severe AKI were at 3.2 (95% confidence interval: 1.2-8.2) times the risk of 30-day mortality compared to those without. Even after adjusting for age and Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile, those with moderate/severe AKI had 1.75 (95% confidence interval: 1.03-3.0) times the risk of 1-year mortality compared to those without.

DISCUSSION

Risk-stratifying patients prior to LVAD placement in regard to AKI development may be a step toward improving surgical outcomes.

Left Ventricular Assist Devices and the Kidney

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are common and implantation carries risk of AKI. LVADs are used as a bridge to heart transplantation or as destination therapy. Patients with refractory heart failure that develop chronic cardiorenal syndrome and CKD often improve after LVAD placement. Nevertheless, reversibility of CKD is hard to predict. After LVAD placement, significant GFR increases may be followed by a late return to near baseline GFR levels, and in some patients, a decline in GFR. In this review, we discuss changes in GFR after LVAD placement, the incidence of AKI and associated mortality after LVAD placement, the management of AKI requiring RRT, and lastly, we review salient features about cardiorenal syndrome learned from the LVAD experience. In light of the growing number of patients using LVADs as a destination therapy, it is important to understand the effect of these devices on the kidney. Additional research and long-term data are required to better understand the relationship between the LVAD and the kidney.

Renal Function and Outcomes With Use of Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation and Inotropes in End-Stage Heart Failure: A Retrospective Single Center Study

Background

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and inotrope therapy serve as a bridge to transplant (BTT) or as destination therapy in patients who are not heart transplant candidates. End-stage heart failure patients often have impaired renal function, and renal outcomes after LVAD therapy versus inotrope therapy have not been evaluated.

Methods

In this study, 169 patients with continuous flow LVAD therapy and 20 patients with continuous intravenous inotrope therapy were analyzed. The two groups were evaluated at baseline and at 3 and 6 months after LVAD or inotrope therapy was started. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), BTT rate, and mortality for 6 months following LVAD or inotrope therapy were studied. Results between the groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square with continuity correction or Fischer’s exact at the significance level of 0.05.

Results

Mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was not statistically different between the two groups, with P = 0.471, 0.429, and 0.847 at baseline, 3 and 6 months, respectively. The incidence of AKI, RRT, and BTT was not statistically different. Mortality was less in the inotrope group (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Intravenous inotrope therapy in end-stage heart failure patients is non-inferior for mortality, incidence of AKI, need for RRT, and renal function for 6-month follow-up when compared to LVAD therapy. Further studies are needed to compare the effectiveness of inotropes versus LVAD implantation on renal function and outcomes over a longer time period.

Renal dysfunction and chronic mechanical circulatory support: from patient selection to long-term management and prognosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to describe the effects of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) on changes in kidney function and their relationship with mortality, with an additional focus on the evaluation and management of both preimplant and post-MCS renal dysfunction.

RECENT FINDINGS

Renal dysfunction is highly prevalent in patients referred for MCS and is associated with significantly increased mortality and postoperative acute kidney injury. Most patients, including those with renal dysfunction, experience marked early improvement in renal function with MCS, likely secondary to correction of the cardiogenic shock, volume overload, and neurohormonal activation characteristic of advanced heart failure. Currently, there are no diagnostic tests to definitively distinguish reversible forms of renal dysfunction likely to improve with MCS from irreversible renal dysfunction. Furthermore, the characteristic improvements in renal function observed in the early months of MCS are often transient, with subsequent recurrence of renal dysfunction with longer durations of support. Venous congestion, right ventricular dysfunction, and reduced pulsatility are potential mechanisms involved in resurgence of renal dysfunction following MCS.

SUMMARY

With the exponential growth of MCS, research endeavors to both improve understanding of the mechanisms behind observed changes in renal function and elucidate the device-related effects on the kidney are imperative.

Ventricular Assist Devices in Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this review are to discuss the process of patient and mechanical device selection, operative management, and postoperative care with a focus on the management of right ventricular failure, anticoagulation strategies, device-related infections and neurologic sequelae.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, PubMed.

CONCLUSION

The number of patients with advanced heart failure due to either acquired or congenital heart disease continues to increase, necessitating in some mechanical circulatory support and in others cardiac transplantation. With a limited cardiac donor pool, mechanical circulatory support is playing a greater role in the management of this population. The perioperative morbidity associated with mechanical circulatory support has lessened with improved postoperative management strategies.

Left ventricular assist devices: a kidney's perspective

The left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has become an established treatment option for patients with refractory heart failure. Many of these patients experience chronic kidney disease (CKD) due to chronic cardiorenal syndrome type II, which is often alleviated quickly following LVAD implantation. Nevertheless, reversibility of CKD remains difficult to predict. Interestingly, initial recovery of GFR appears to be transient, being followed by gradual but significant late decline. Nevertheless, GFR often remains elevated compared to preimplant status. Larger GFR increases are followed by a proportionally larger late decline. Several explanations for this gradual decline in renal function after LVAD therapy have been proposed, yet a definitive answer remains elusive. Mortality predictors of LVAD implantation are the occurrence of either postimplantation acute kidney injury (AKI) or preimplant CKD. However, patient outcomes continue to improve as LVAD therapy becomes more widespread, and adverse events including AKI appear to decline. In light of a growing destination therapy population, it is important to understand the cumulative effects of long-term LVAD support on kidney function. Additional research and passage of time are required to further unravel the intricate relationships between the LVAD and the kidney.

Cardiac Assist Devices and Hemodialysis Catheter Procedures - What Do the Nephrologists Need to Know?

The use of ventricular assist devices (VAD) and total artificial heart (TAH) is increasing rapidly, and a large proportion of these device recipients already have or will develop severe renal dysfunction at the time of device implantation. As a consequence, nephrologists are becoming more and more involved in the care of this challenging population. As nephrologists take upon themselves many aspects of dialysis vascular access care, they need to be familiar with the special circumstances of performing hemodialysis catheter procedures in these patients. This review describes the important characteristics of these devices that have serious implications for the technique of placing or replacing dialysis catheters. These implications apply for both tunneled and nontunneled dialysis catheters and so concern all nephrologists, not only the interventionalists. We describe the important anatomical factors, anticoagulation management, device management, vascular access management and technical considerations of placing or replacing tunneled and nontunneled hemodialysis catheters from the perspective of a nephrologist establishing and maintaining lifesaving dialysis vascular access. Without a good understanding of these devices, serious consequences such as VAD rotor damage or blockage, or artificial heart valve blockage or damage can occur. These artificial devices are lifesaving, and any such complication is unacceptable. This review describes steps to minimize the risks.

Kidney dysfunction and left ventricular assist device support: a comprehensive perioperative review

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are used increasingly as a bridge to transplantation or as destination therapy in end-stage heart failure patients who do not respond to optimal medical therapy. Many of these patients have end-organ dysfunction, including advanced kidney dysfunction, before and after LVAD implantation. Kidney dysfunction is a marker of adverse outcomes, such as increased morbidity and mortality. This review discusses kidney dysfunction and associated management strategies during the dynamic perioperative time period of LVAD implantation. Furthermore, we suggest potential future research directions to better understand the complex relationship between renal pathophysiology and mechanical circulatory support.

Thymoglobulin induction in heart transplantation: patient selection and implications for maintenance immunosuppression

Clinical data relating to rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) induction in heart transplantation are far less extensive than for other immunosuppressants, or indeed for rATG in other indications. This was highlighted by the low grade of evidence and the lack of detailed recommendations for prescribing rATG in the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines. The heart transplant population includes an increasing frequency of patients on mechanical circulatory support (MCS), often with ongoing infection and/or presensitization, who are at high immunological risk but also vulnerable to infectious complications. The number of patients with renal impairment is also growing due to lengthening waiting times, intensifying the need for strategies that minimize calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity. Additionally, the importance of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in predicting graft failure is influencing immunosuppressive regimens. In light of these developments, and in view of the lack of evidence-based prescribing criteria, experts from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland convened to identify indications for rATG induction in heart transplantation and to develop an algorithm for its use based on patient characteristics.

Implantable left ventricular assist devices and the kidney

The use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) in treating patients with advanced heart failure restores cardiac output resulting in improved perfusion to multiple organ systems with important clinical benefits. Renal pathophysiology during LVAD support remains an evolving, poorly understood, and potentially dynamic problem. Changes in renal function after LVAD placement have been investigated in multiple studies with contradictory results. Renal dysfunction is common prior to LVAD placement, which complicates postoperative clinical outcomes. The purpose of this review is to assess the latest information regarding the effects of LVADs on renal function with regard to hemodynamics, physiology, pathology and clinical issues prior to and after placement of the devices. The review should then aid in identifying patients best suited to benefit from this technology and to refine the therapy to reduce associated risks.

Acute kidney injury and mortality following ventricular assist device implantation

BACKGROUND

Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are increasingly common, and their surgical implantation predisposes patients to an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). We sought to evaluate the incidence, risk factors and short- and long-term all-cause mortality of patients with AKI following VAD implantation.

METHODS

We identified all patients who underwent VAD implantation at the University of Chicago between January 1, 2008, and January 31, 2012. We evaluated the incidence of AKI, defined as a ≥50% increase in serum creatinine over the first 7 postoperative days (RIFLE Risk-Creatinine). A logistic regression model was used to identify risk factors for the development of AKI, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine factors associated with 30-day and 365-day all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 157 eligible patients had VAD implantations with 44 (28%) developing postimplantation AKI. In a multivariate analysis, only diabetes mellitus [odds ratio = 2.25 (1.03-4.94), p = 0.04] was identified as a significant predictor of postoperative AKI. Using a multivariable model censored for heart transplantation, only AKI [hazard ratio, HR = 3.01 (1.15-7.92), p = 0.03] and cardiopulmonary bypass time [HR = 1.01 (1.001-1.02), p = 0.02] were independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Preoperative body mass index [HR = 0.95 (0.90-0.99), p = 0.03], preoperative diabetes mellitus [HR = 1.89 (1.07-3.35), p = 0.03] and postimplantation AKI [HR = 1.85 (1.06-3.21), p = 0.03] independently predicted 365-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

AKI is common following VAD implantation and is an independent predictor of 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality.

Prevalence and prognostic importance of changes in renal function after mechanical circulatory support

BACKGROUND

The long-term durability and prognostic significance of improvement in renal function after mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has yet to be characterized in a large multicenter population. The primary goals of this analysis were to describe serial post-MCS changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and determine their association with all-cause mortality.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Adult patients enrolled in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) with serial creatinine levels available (n=3363) were studied. Early post-MCS, eGFR improved substantially (median improvement, 48.9%; P<0.001) with 22.3% of the population improving their eGFR by ≥100% within the first few weeks. However, in the majority of patients, this improvement was transient, and by 1 year, eGFR was only 6.7% above the pre-MCS value (P<0.001). This pattern of early improvement followed by deterioration in eGFR was observed with both pulsatile and continuous-flow devices. Interestingly, poor survival was associated with both marked improvement (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-2.26; P=0.002) and worsening in eGFR (adjusted HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.15-2.13; P=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-MCS, early improvement in renal function is common but seems to be largely transient and not necessarily indicative of an improved prognosis. This pattern was observed with both pulsatile and continuous-flow devices. Additional research is necessary to better understand the mechanistic basis for these complex post-MCS changes in renal function and their associated survival disadvantage.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00119834.

The pharmacotherapy implications of ventricular assist device in the patient with end-stage heart failure

Advances in mechanical circulatory support, such as the use of ventricular assist devices (VADs), have become a means for prolonging survival in end-stage heart failure (HF). VADs decrease the symptoms of HF and improve quality of life by replacing some of the work of a failing heart. They unload the ventricle to provide improved cardiac output and end-organ perfusion, resulting in improvement in cardiorenal syndromes and New York Heart Association functional class rating. VADs are currently used asa bridge to heart transplantation, a bridge to recovery of cardiac function, or as destination therapy. Complications of VAD include bleeding, infections, arrhythmias, multiple organ failure, right ventricular failure, and neurological dysfunction. Patients with VAD have unique pharmacotherapeutic requirements in terms of anticoagulation, appropriate antibiotic selection, and continuation of HF medications. Pharmacists in acute care and community settings are well prepared to care for the patient with VAD. These patients require thorough counseling and follow-up with regard to prevention and treatment of infections, appropriate levels of anticoagulation, and maintenance of fluid balance. A basic understanding of this unique therapy can assist pharmacists in attending to the needs of patients with VAD.

Changes in renal function after implantation of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine renal outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.

BACKGROUND

Renal dysfunction before LVAD placement is frequent, and it is unclear whether it is due to primary renal disease or to poor perfusion.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted in 83 consecutive patients implanted with HeartMate II continuous-flow LVADs (Thoratec Corp., Pleasanton, California). Calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was assessed on admission and 1, 3, and 6 months after implantation. To define predictors for improvement in GFR, clinical variables were examined in patients with decreased renal function (GFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) before LVAD, surviving and dialysis-free at 1 month (n = 44).

RESULTS

GFR significantly increased from admission (53.2 ± 21.4 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) to 1 month after LVAD implantation (87.4 ± 27.9 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) (p < 0.0001). Subsequently, at 3 and 6 months, GFR remained significantly (p < 0.0001) above pre-LVAD values. Of the 51 patients with GFRs <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) before LVAD surviving at 1 month, 34 (67%) improved to GFRs >60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Univariate pre-operative predictors for improvement in renal function at 1 month included younger age (p = 0.049), GFR improvement with optimal medical therapy (p < 0.001), intra-aortic balloon pump use (p = 0.004), kidney length above 10 cm (p = 0.023), no treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (p = 0.029), higher bilirubin (p = 0.002), higher Lietz-Miller score (p = 0.019), and atrial fibrillation (p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis indicated pre-operative improved GFR (slope = 0.5 U per unit improved; 95% confidence interval: 0.2 to 0.8; p = 0.003), atrial fibrillation (slope = 27; 95% confidence interval: 8 to 46; p = 0.006), and intra-aortic balloon pump use (slope = 14; 95% confidence interval: 2 to 26; p = 0.02) as independent predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

In most patients with end-stage heart failure considered for LVAD implantation, renal dysfunction is reversible and likely related to poor renal perfusion.