Ventricular Assist Device Driveline Dressing-Change Protocols: A Need for Standardization. A Report from the SimVAD Investigators

Driveline dressings used in heartmate patients and local complications: A retrospective cohort

BACKGROUND

Patients with long-term ventricular assist devices (VAD) are predisposed to infection, bleeding, and pressure injuries at the insertion of the driveline. There is no consensus on a driveline dressing protocol. Chlorhexidine is often used to clean the driveline exit site and has been associated with lower rates of infection. For driveline coverage, bacteriostatic agents and transparent film have shown good results, but are costly. The same issue was associated with anchorage devices.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the types of dressings used in the driveline of patients using HeartMate (HM) and to describe the incidence density of local complications (infection, bleeding, and pressure injury) within 30 days postoperatively.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted and included 22 patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit after implantation of HM II and III in a Brazilian private hospital.

RESULTS

Several types of dressings were used in the drivelines. There were 22 different types of dressings. Dressing type 6 (Chlorhexidine, Excilon, Gauze and IV3000) were the most used (45.4%). Subjects using the Flexi-Trak anchoring device had a higher rate of local bleeding (50.0%) and those who used the Hollister device had more infection (61.1%) and pressure injury associated with a medical device (11.1%), compared to others. Infection was the primary complication (45.4%), followed by local bleeding (27.7%).

CONCLUSION

Despite the high variability of products used in the driveline of patients using HeartMate, the dressing made with chlorhexidine, silver-impregnated absorbent foam and transparent film, and the use of anchoring devices was the most frequently used. Infection was the most common complication.

Mortality following durable left ventricular assist device implantation by timing and type of first infection

OBJECTIVE

Although infections are common after left ventricular assist device implantation, the relationship between timing and type of first infection with regard to mortality is less well understood.

METHODS

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support patients receiving a primary left ventricular assist device from April 2012 to May 2017 were included. The primary exposure was defined 3 ways: any infection, timing of first infection (early: ≤90 days; intermediate: 91-180 days; late: >180 days), and type (ventricular assist device specific, ventricular assist device related, non-ventricular assist device). The association between first infection and all-cause mortality was estimated using Cox regression.

RESULTS

The cohort included 12,957 patients at 166 centers (destination therapy: 47.4%, bridge-to-transplant: 41.2%). First infections were most often non-ventricular assist device (54.2%). Rates of first infection were highest in the early interval (10.7/100 person-months). Patients with any infection had a significantly higher adjusted hazard of death (hazard ratio, 2.63; 2.46-2.86). First infection in the intermediate interval was associated with the largest increase in adjusted hazard of death (hazard ratio, 3.26; 2.82-3.78), followed by late (hazard ratio, 3.13; 2.77-3.53) and early intervals (hazard ratio, 2.37; 2.16-2.60). Ventricular assist device-related infections were associated with the largest increase in hazard of death (hazard ratio, 3.02; 2.69-3.40), followed by ventricular assist device specific (hazard ratio, 2.92; 2.57-3.32) and non-ventricular assist device (hazard ratio, 2.42; 2.20-2.65).

CONCLUSIONS

Relative to those without infection, patients with any postimplantation infection had an increased risk of death. Ventricular assist device-related infections and infections occurring in the intermediate interval were associated with the largest increase in risk of death. After left ventricular assist device implantation, infection prevention strategies should target non-ventricular assist device infections in the first 90 days, then shift to surveillance/prevention of driveline infections after 90 days.

Ventricular Assist Device Self-care Education at Tertiary Care Medical Centers

Ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation requires patients and caregivers to attain self-care knowledge and skills before discharge from implant hospitalization. Inability to perform these skills can have devastating outcomes (i.e., death from pump malfunction, driveline site infections, and stroke). No standard-of-care guiding VAD self-care education exists. We sought to describe how select tertiary care VAD implant centers across the United States currently educate VAD patients and their caregivers. Using a multiple case studies design with a purposive sampling strategy, we conducted semistructured interviews of VAD coordinators responsible for VAD education at 18 centers. From audio recording of interviews, we used rapid qualitative analysis to organize and analyze the data. All centers spent significant time and effort educating patients and caregivers on VAD self-care. Although centers teach similar content, the rigor of assessments and follow-up education differed vastly. Only 3/18 (17%) centers performed competency-based assessments with a skills checklist and minimum passing standard assessing readiness to perform VAD self-care independently. Twelve of 18 (67%) centers provided formal follow-up education to address skills decay, yet wide variation existed in timing and content of education. Due to the diversity among centers regarding VAD self-care education, more prescriptive practice guidelines are needed.

Preventing Driveline Infection during Left Ventricular Assist Device Support by the HeartMate 3: A Survey-Based Study

PURPOSE

Driveline infection (DLI) is a significant source of morbidity and mortality during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support yet limited studies are available to describe center-level prevalence, preventive practices and their potential effectiveness.

METHODS

We surveyed LVAD centers in the United States to determine program burden and preventive practices for DLI during HeartMate (HM) 3 support. An online, anonymous, question-based survey was sent to expert providers at implanting centers. Only a single respondent completed the survey for each center. As an exploratory analysis, we compared specific DLI preventive practices between centers with low (≤10%) and high (>10%) reported prevalence of DLI.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight centers responded to the survey (response rate: 50%). Respondent were comprised of 37 (47%) heart failure cardiologists, 27 (35%) LVAD coordinators and 14 (18%) cardiothoracic surgeons. The prevalence of DLI during HM3 was reported as ≤10% by 27 (35%), 11-25% by 36 (46%) and >25% by 16 (19%) of centers. Thirteen (17%) centers had a body mass index threshold for device placement, 29 (37%) utilized a counter incision, 66 (81%) placed an anchor stitch and 69 (88%) used an external device to stabilize the DL. Proportionally more centers with a low DLI prevalence used a wound vacuum 6(22%) vs. 3(6%, p=0.03) than those with high DLI.

CONCLUSION

Variation exists in reported prevalence and practices of preventing and managing driveline infections across centers during HM3 support. Further studies are warranted to develop and assess the effectiveness of standardized preventive strategies.

Effect of Ventricular Assist Device Self-care Simulation-Based Mastery Learning on Driveline Exit Site Infections: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Ventricular assist device simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) results in better patient and caregiver self-care skills compared with usual training.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of SBML on driveline exit site infections.

METHODS

We compared the probability of remaining infection free at 3 and 12 months between patients randomized to SBML or usual training.

RESULTS

The SBML-training group had no infections at 3 months and 2 infections at 12 months, yielding a Kaplan-Meier estimate of the probability of remaining infection free of 0.857 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.692-1.00) at 12 months. The usual-training group had 6 infections at 3 months with no additional infections by 12 months. Kaplan-Meier estimates of remaining infection free at 3 and 12 months were 0.878 (95% CI, 0.758-1.00) and 0.748 (95% CI, 0.591-0.946), respectively. Time-to-infection distributions for SBML versus usual training showed a difference in 12-month infection rates of 0.109 (P = .07).

CONCLUSIONS

Ventricular assist device self-care SBML resulted in fewer 12-month infections.

Driveline exit-site care protocols in patients with left ventricular assist devices: a systematic review

 

OBJECTIVES

Driveline infections continue to be a significant complication following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Driveline exit-site care is crucial for the prevention of infections; however, there are no uniform guidelines. The goal of this study was to provide an overview of the currently published driveline exit-site care protocols in patients with LVAD.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed. Studies before 15 December 2020 were included if the number of driveline infections was a primary outcome and the driveline exit-site care protocol was explained.

RESULTS

Eleven articles were included in the systematic review, including 1602 patients with LVADs. The median of the frequency of driveline infections in the articles was 13.8% with a range of 0–52.6%. There was a marked variability in the methods of care of driveline exit sites, without a standardized driveline dressing technique in patients with LVADs. The frequency of driveline infections was 6–7.5% in studies using a dressing kit that included chlorhexidine, a silver-based dressing and an anchoring device. Furthermore, there was variability in the anchoring devices and the frequency of dressing changes, which varied from daily to weekly. No specific anchoring device or change frequency was found to be superior.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this systematic review, driveline exit care protocols that included chlorhexidine, a silver-based dressing, the use of an anchoring device and dressing kits might be best in reducing driveline infection rates. However, prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to establish the optimal protocol for driveline exit-site care.

Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perceptions of Ventricular Assist Device Self-care Education Inform the Development of a Simulation-based Mastery Learning Curriculum

BACKGROUND

Patients who undergo ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation and their caregivers must rapidly learn a significant amount of self-care skills and knowledge.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore patient, caregiver, VAD coordinator, and physician perspectives and perceptions of existing VAD self-care training to inform development of a simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) curriculum to teach patients and caregivers VAD self-care skills and knowledge.

METHODS

We conducted semistructured, in-person interviews with patients with a VAD, their caregivers, VAD coordinators, and physicians (cardiac surgeons, an infectious disease physician, and advanced heart failure cardiologists). We used a 2-cycle team-based iterative inductive approach to coding and analysis.

RESULTS

We interviewed 16 patients, 12 caregivers, 7 VAD coordinators, and 11 physicians. Seven major themes were derived from the interviews including (1) identification of critical curricular content, (2) need for standardization and assessment, (3) training modalities, (4) benefits of repetition, (5) piercing it all together, (6) need for refresher training, and (7) provision of training before implant.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this study suggest that SBML is a natural fit for the high-risk tasks needed to save VAD self-care. The 7 unique training-related themes derived from the qualitative data informed the design and development of a VAD SBML self-care curriculum.