Diagnosis, treatment and predictors of prognosis of myocarditis. A narrative review

Diagnosis and management of cancer therapy-related myocarditis in a young female: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

The treatment of choice for Extra-osseous Ewing's sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (ES/PNET), a rare neoplasm, is the VAC/IE regimen. This regimen includes Doxorubicin, Vincristine, Cyclophosphamide, Ifosfamide, and Etoposide, all of which have cardiotoxic effects. Myocarditis, a potentially threatening side effect following cancer therapy, can be accurately managed and diagnosed.

CASE PRESENTATION

In the current study, we report the case of a 19-year-old female with a mass on the abdominal wall, diagnosed with ES/PNET. She was treated with the VAC/IE regimen. A month after the last session of chemotherapy, she experienced dyspnea. Upon evaluation, a high level of troponin and a low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were detected via transthoracic echocardiography. She was treated with anti-heart failure drugs, but the response was unsatisfactory. The possibility of Cancer therapy-related myocarditis was suspected, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) confirmed acute myocarditis. This patient exhibited a significant response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), with her LVEF improving from 30-35% to 50% within three months.

CONCLUSION

In this case, based on negative tests and the absence of viral signs and symptoms, Cancer therapy-related myocarditis is highly suspected as the cause of myocarditis. This case underscores the importance of accurately utilizing CMR as a non-invasive method for diagnosing myocarditis. It effectively highlights the identification of reversible myocarditis with appropriate treatment and the notable response to IVIG, suggesting its potential as a favorable treatment for myocarditis in younger patients.

MicroRNAs in Myocarditis-Review of the Preclinical In Vivo Trials

Myocarditis is an inflammatory heart disease with viruses as the most common cause. Regardless of multiple studies that have recently been conducted, the diagnostic options still need to be improved. Although endomyocardial biopsy is known as a diagnostic gold standard, it is invasive and, thus, only sometimes performed. Novel techniques of cardiac magnetic resonance are not readily available. Therapy in viral infections is based mainly on symptomatic treatment, while steroids and intravenous immunoglobulins are used in autoimmune myocarditis. The effectiveness of neither of these methods has been explicitly proven to date. Therefore, novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are highly needed. MiRNAs are small, non-coding molecules that regulate fundamental cell functions, including differentiation, metabolism, and apoptosis. They present altered levels in different diseases, including myocarditis. Numerous studies investigating the role of miRNAs in myocarditis have already been conducted. In this review, we discussed only the original preclinical in vivo research. We eventually included 30 studies relevant to the discussed area. The altered miRNA levels have been observed, including upregulation and downregulation of different miRNAs in the mice models of myocarditis. Furthermore, the administration of mimics or inhibitors of particular miRNAs was shown to significantly influence inflammation, morphology, and function of the heart and overall survival. Finally, some studies presented prospective advantages in vaccine development.

Role of cardiac magnetic resonance in the differential diagnosis between arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy with left ventricular involvement and previous infectious myocarditis

AIMS

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy with left ventricular involvement (ACM-LV), particularly in case of isolated left ventricular involvement (i.e. left dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, LDAC) and previous infectious myocarditis (pIM) may have overlapping clinical and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) features. To date, there are no validated CMR criteria for the differential diagnosis between these conditions. The present study aimed to identify CMR characteristics to distinguish ACM-LV from pIM.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This observational, retrospective, single-centre study included 30 pIM patients and 30 ACM-LV patients. In ACM-LV patients CMR was performed at diagnosis; in patients with pIM, CMR was performed six months after acute infection. CMR analysis included quantitative assessment of left ventricle (LV) volumes, systolic function and wall thicknesses, qualitative and quantitative assessment of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences. Compared with pIM, ACM-LV patients showed slightly larger LV volumes, more frequent regional wall motion anomalies and reduced wall thicknesses. ACM-LV patients had higher amounts of LV LGE and extension. Notably, the LDAC subgroup had the highest amount of LV LGE. LV LGE amount > 15 g and a LV LGE percentage > 30% of LV mass discriminated ACM-LV from pIM with a 100% specificity. LGE segmental distribution was superimposable among the groups, except for septal segments that were more frequently involved in ACM-LV and LDAC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A great extension of LV LGE (a cut-off of LGE >15 g and a percentage above 30% of LV LGE in relation to total myocardial mass) discriminates ACM-LV from pIM with extremely high specificity.

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Findings in Patients Recovered from COVID-19 Pneumonia and Presenting with Persistent Cardiac Symptoms: The TRICITY-CMR Trial

The prevalence and clinical consequences of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related non-ischemic cardiac injury are under investigation. The main purpose of this study was to determine the occurrence of non-ischemic cardiac injury using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients with persistent cardiac symptoms following recovery from COVID-19 pneumonia. We conducted a single-center, cross-sectional study. Between January 2021 and May 2021, we enrolled 121 patients with a recent COVID-19 infection and persistent cardiac symptoms. Study participants were divided into those who required hospitalization during the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 58; 47.9%) and those non-hospitalized (n = 63; 52.1%). Non-ischemic cardiac injury (defined as the presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) lesion and/or active myocarditis in CMR) was detected in over half of post-COVID-19 patients (n = 64; 52.9%). LGE lesions were present in 63 (52.1%) and active myocarditis in 10 (8.3%) post-COVID-19 study participants. The majority of LGE lesions were located in the left ventricle at inferior and inferolateral segments at the base. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of LGE lesions (35 (60.3%) vs. 28 (44.4%); p = 0.117) or active myocarditis (6 (10.3%) vs. 4 (6.3%); p = 0.517) between hospitalized and non-hospitalized post-COVID-19 patients. However, CMR imaging revealed lower right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF; 49.5 (44; 54) vs. 53 (50; 58) %; p = 0.001) and more frequent presence of reduced RVEF (60.3% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.005) in the former subgroup. In conclusion, more than half of our patients presenting with cardiac symptoms after a recent recovery from COVID-19 pneumonia had CMR imaging abnormalities indicating non-ischemic cardiac injury. The most common finding was LGE, while active myocarditis was detected in the minority of patients. CMR imaging abnormalities were observed both in previously hospitalized and non-hospitalized post-COVID-19 patients. Further research is needed to determine the long-term cardiovascular consequences of COVID-19 infection and the optimal management of patients with suspected post-COVID-19 non-ischemic cardiac injury.

A Case Series of Myocarditis Related to the COVID-19 Vaccine

Perimyocarditis related to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine is one of the rare adverse events that emerged in April 2021 and then the number of cases commensurably increased as the number of vaccinated people rose. This is a case series of myocarditis/pericarditis related to the messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine in which we identified four cases with different presentations and outcomes. A short-term follow-up period of five months revealed a full recovery of three cases within one to 12 weeks and persistent left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the fourth case which will require further follow-up to assess long-term outcomes.

Clinical course, viral etiology, and the diagnostic workup for patients with suspected myocarditis: a single-center prospective study

BACKGROUND

Myocarditis is a highly heterogeneous disorder with a challenging diagnostic work-up. We aimed to focus on the possible diagnostic workup for this condition in settings where endomyocardial biopsy as a gold standard is not always feasible, detect the etiologic cardiotropic viruses in our locality, and follow the clinical course in patients admitted with clinically suspected myocarditis.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study. We recruited patients with clinically suspected myocarditis presenting at a university hospital from October 1st, 2020 until March 31st, 2021. All Patients had a diagnostic coronary angiography and were included only if they had a non-obstructive coronary artery disease. All patients also had cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) with contrast. Sera were obtained from all suspected patients for detection of antibodies against viruses using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and viral genomes using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and reverse transcription-PCR. Endomyocardial biopsy was done for patients with a typical CMR picture of myocarditis.

RESULTS

Out of 2163 patients presenting to the hospital within the 6 months, only 51 met the inclusion criteria. Males represented 73%, with a mean age of 39 ± 16 years. CMR showed an ischemic pattern in 4 patients and thus they were excluded. We classified patients into two categories based on CMR results: group A (CMR-positive myocarditis), 12 patients (25.5%), and group B (CMR-negative myocarditis), 35 (74.5%) patients. On serological analysis, 66% of patients (n = 31/47) showed antibodies against the common cardiotropic viruses. Parvovirus B19 IgM in 22 patients (47%) and coxsackievirus IgM in 16 (34%) were the most observed etiologies. Regarding the outcome, 42.5% of patients recovered left ventricular ejection fraction and three patients died at 6 months' clinical follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Patients with Clinically suspected myocarditis represented 2.2% of total hospital admissions in 6 months. CMR is only a good positive test for the diagnosis of acute myocarditis. Parvovirus B19 and coxsackievirus were the most common pathogens in our locality.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trial registration no., NCT04312490; first registration: 18/03/2020. First recruited case 01/10/2020. URL: https://register.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S0009O3D&selectaction=Edit&uid=U0002DVP&ts=2&cx=9zdfin .

Cardiomyopathy Associated with Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination: What Do We Know?

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has mobilized many efforts worldwide to curb its impact on morbidity and mortality. Vaccination of the general population has resulted in the administration of more than 6,700,000,000 doses by the end of October 2021, which is the most effective method to prevent hospitalization and death. Among the adverse effects described, myocarditis and pericarditis are low-frequency events (less than 10 per 100,000 people), mainly observed with messenger RNA vaccines. The mechanisms responsible for these effects have not been specified, considering an exacerbated and uncontrolled immune response and an autoimmune response against specific cardiomyocyte proteins. This greater immunogenicity and reactogenicity is clinically manifested in a differential manner in pediatric patients, adults, and the elderly, determining specific characteristics of its presentation for each age group. It generally develops as a condition of mild to moderate severity, whose symptoms and imaging findings are self-limited, resolving favorably in days to weeks and, exceptionally, reporting deaths associated with this complication. The short- and medium-term prognosis is favorable, highlighting the lack of data on long-term evolution, which should be determined in longer follow-ups.