Intra-arterial vasodilators to prevent radial artery spasm: a systematic review and pooled analysis of clinical studies

Intra-arterial nicardipine versus verapamil during transradial access coronary catheterization

INTRODUCTION

Intra-arterial (IA) vasodilators are recommended during transradial access (TRA) to prevent radial artery spasm (RAS). The American Heart Association (AHA) recommends either IA verapamil, diltiazem, nicardipine, or nitroglycerin to prevent RAS. To our knowledge, the efficacy of RAS prevention and patient tolerability of verapamil and nicardipine has not been directly compared in a randomized fashion.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, single-blinded randomized clinical trial comparing the discomfort experienced by patients receiving either 400 μg of IA nicardipine (n = 26) or 5 mg of IA verapamil (n = 29). Patient discomfort and/or pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) both before and after IA administration of nicardipine or verapamil.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference in mean change in VAS scores between the 2 groups, with an average increase in VAS score of 0.88 in the nicardipine group and 4.81 in the verapamil group (p < 0.0001). The overall rate of RAS was low in our study (5.5 %) with no significant difference in RAS incidence between the 2 groups (p = 0.465). The nicardipine group had 2 RAS cases (7.7 %), with 1 requiring a change in strategy (3.8 %). The verapamil group had 1 RAS case (3.4 %) that did not require a change in strategy.

CONCLUSION

In this trial, we showed that nicardipine causes significantly less discomfort and pain compared to verapamil during IA administration for TRA cardiac catheterization.

Evaluation of Pulse Wave Analysis for Detecting Arterial Tone Changes During Transradial Access Coronary Angiography

INTRODUCTION

According to guideline recommendations, transradial access coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention are the current gold standards. Although it reduces overall mortality and major bleeding, a significant proportion of patients develop radial artery spasms. In this trial, we aimed to investigate potential risk constellations during the whole procedure of coronary angiography by repetitive pulse wave analysis (PWA) measurements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective pilot study, we included 36 patients with a guideline-based indication for coronary angiography. Repetitive PWA measurements were performed at the following time points: baseline, after sheath insertion, after administration of nitroglycerin, after guidewire crossing, and at the end of the procedure. We aimed to identify critical procedural steps that alter vascular tone and predispose to vasospasm.

RESULTS

Radial spasm occurred in 8% (n=3), and access site conversion to transfemoral was necessary in 3% of all cases (n=1). We could not detect significant changes in pulse wave parameters throughout the procedure. We observed a non-significant drop in systolic blood pressure after sheath insertion by about 7 mmHg and a non-significant slight decrease in diastolic blood pressure after guidewire crossing by 3 to 5 mmHg.

CONCLUSIONS

PWA measurements during coronary angiography are feasible and easy to use. However, we could not detect significant changes in individual PWA parameters throughout the procedure. The assessment of vascular tone by PWA during coronary angiography is very challenging. Large-scale trials are needed to gain further clarity and detect potential subtle effects.

Transradial Approach for Neurovascular Interventions : A Literature Review

The femoral artery is the preferred access route for neurointerventions. The transfemoral approach (TFA) offers advantages such as a large diameter and easy access. However, it also entails disadvantages such as patient discomfort and high risk of complications. Following the initial report of coronary angiography using the transradial approach (TRA) in 1989, cardiologists discovered the advantages of TRA over the TFA and gradually replaced it with the TRA. In 1997, Matsumoto et al. used the TRA for cerebral angiography and neurointervention. Thereafter, the adoption of TRA for neurointervention gradually increased and good outcomes were reported. However, despite these developments, the adoption rate of TRA is relatively low. We reviewed the relevant studies to increase the accessibility of TRA for neurointerventionists.

Treatment of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization: a review of the literature and proposed treatment algorithm

The transradial artery has been established as the default access site for most coronary catheterization procedures with fewer access-related and bleeding complications, rapid hemostasis, early ambulation of the patient, and reduction in all-cause mortality compared with transfemoral access. However, radial artery occlusion (RAO) remains the most frequent complication of coronary catheterization procedures performed via transradial artery access. The purpose of our review was to conduct detailed literature research and summarize all the available treatment strategies for RAO, given the lack of a standardized treatment protocol in the literature. Pharmacological treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or other anticoagulants, invasive strategies, and pharmaco-invasive methods available in the literature were included in our review. Data were derived from case series, case reports, clinical trials, and observational studies. Eight studies regarding pharmacological treatment with LMWH or any other anticoagulant and seven studies of invasive treatment were included in our review. There were only two randomized studies: one with LMWH (tinzaparin) and one with apixaban. Furthermore, taking into consideration data derived from the above-mentioned studies, a treatment algorithm for RAO was proposed. RAO remains the most frequent complication of coronary procedures with transradial access. Application of preventive strategies and comprehensive knowledge of the risk factors remain the key factors for the reduction of the incidence of this clinical entity. Therapeutic options include anticoagulation regimens and interventional techniques through the distal radial artery. Large, randomized, multicenter studies should be conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the available treatment methods and define a standardized treatment protocol for RAO.

Comparison of Brachial Compression Versus Ulnar Compression on Radial Artery Diameter: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objectives: This study is aimed at comparing the effectiveness of ulnar compression and brachial compression in inducing radial artery dilatation. Methods: This randomized crossover study included 30 patients undergoing elective diagnostic transradial coronary angiography. Ulnar compression and brachial compression maneuvers were performed in two groups. Radial artery diameter and cross-sectional area were measured at baseline and remeasured every 30 s (up to 2 min) after the interventions. Results: Both ulnar compression and brachial compression maneuvers successfully increased radial artery diameter for up to 60 s following the interventions. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups after adjusting for baseline measurements. However, each treatment group showed a significant increase in indicators up to 60 s, followed by a subsequent decrease. The maximum radial artery diameter occurred at 60 s after the removal of compression in both groups. Conclusion: Ulnar compression and brachial compression maneuvers demonstrated effectiveness in inducing radial artery dilation for a limited duration. These maneuvers may reduce the occurrence of access failure during radial artery cannulation. No significant differences were observed between the two maneuvers, indicating that they can be used interchangeably based on clinician preference. So, because the ulnar compression is simpler and more feasible for the patients, it can be considered instead of brachial compression. Trial Registration: IRCT20230209057372N1.

Radial Artery Spasm-A Review on Incidence, Prevention and Treatment

Radial artery spasm (RAS) is a common complication associated with transradial access (TRA) for coronary interventions, particularly affecting elderly patients in whom radial access is preferred due to its benefits in reducing bleeding complications, improving clinical outcomes, and lowering long-term costs. This review examines the incidence, prevention, and treatment of RAS. Methods included an online search of PubMed and other databases in early 2024, analyzing meta-analyses, reviews, studies, and case reports. RAS is characterized by a sudden narrowing of the radial artery due to psychological and mechanical factors with incidence reports varying up to 51.3%. Key risk factors include patient characteristics like female sex, age, and small body size as well as procedural factors such as emergency procedures and the use of multiple catheters. Preventive measures include using distal radial access, hydrophilic sheaths, and appropriate catheter sizes. Treatments involve the intraarterial administration of nitroglycerine and verapamil as well as mechanical methods like balloon-assisted tracking. This review underscores the need for standardizing RAS definitions and emphasizes the importance of operator experience and patient management in reducing RAS incidence and improving procedural success.

Incidence and Prognostic Factors of Radial Artery Occlusion in Transradial Coronary Catheterization

Background/Objectives: Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is the most common complication of transradial coronary catheterization. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the incidence of RAO and identify the risk factors that predispose patients to it. Methods: We conducted an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, open-label study involving 1357 patients who underwent cardiac catheterization via the transradial route for angiography and/or a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify potential predictors of RAO occurrence. Additionally, a subgroup analysis only for patients undergoing PCIs was performed. Results: The incidence of RAO was 9.5% overall, 10.6% in the angiography-only group and 6.2% in the PCI group. Independent predictors of RAO were as follows: (i) the female gender (aOR = 1.72 (1.05-2.83)), (ii) access site cross-over (aOR = 4.33 (1.02-18.39)), (iii) increased total time of the sheath in the artery (aOR = 1.01 (1.00-1.02)), (iv) radial artery spasms (aOR = 2.47 (1.40-4.36)), (v) the presence of a hematoma (aOR = 2.28 (1.28-4.06)), (vi) post-catheterization dabigatran use (aOR = 5.15 (1.29-20.55)), (vii) manual hemostasis (aOR = 1.94 (1.01-3.72)) and (viii) numbness at radial artery ultrasound (aOR = 8.25 (1.70-40)). Contrariwise, two variables were independently associated with increased odds for radial artery patency (RAP): (i) PCI performance (aOR = 0.19 (0.06-0.63)), and (ii) a higher dosage of intravenous heparin per patient weight (aOR = 0.98 (0.96-0.99)), particularly, a dosage of >50 IU/kg (aOR = 0.56 (0.31-1.00)). In the PCI subgroup, independent predictors of RAO were as follows: (i) radial artery spasms (aOR = 4.48 (1.42-14.16)), (ii) the use of intra-arterial nitroglycerin as a vasodilator (aOR = 7.40 (1.67-32.79)) and (iii) the presence of symptoms at echo (aOR = 3.80 (1.46-9.87)), either pain (aOR = 2.93 (1.05-8.15)) or numbness (aOR = 4.66 (1.17-18.57)). On the other hand, the use of intra-arterial verapamil as a vasodilator (aOR = 0.17 (0.04-0.76)) was independently associated with a greater frequency of RAP. Conclusions: The incidence of RAO in an unselected, all-comers European population after transradial coronary catheterization for angiography and/or PCIs is similar to that reported in the international literature. Several RAO prognostic factors have been confirmed, and new ones are described. The female gender, radial artery trauma and manual hemostasis are the strongest predictors of RAO. Our results could help in the future identification of patients at higher risk of RAO, for whom less invasive diagnostic procedures maybe preferred, if possible.

Effect of Hand Dominance on Radial Artery Spasm and Occlusion: A Prospective Observational Study

Transradial access has become the most commonly used method for cardiac catheterization. Many medical and technical applications have been proposed to reduce TRA complications. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of hand dominance on radial artery spasm and radial artery occlusionin subjects undergoing CC via TRA. Between April 2020 and August 2022, 1713 subjects who underwent CC via TRA were included in the study. Patient data were obtained in terms of hand dominance of the catheterized side and RAS and RAO during a 1-month follow-up period. RAS was seen in 9.6% of the subjects. The RAS in patients catheterized by the dominant hand was significantly higher than that performed by the non-dominant hand (12 vs 7.8%; P = .004). RAO was seen in 1% of the subjects. RAO was significantly higher in the spasm side than in the no-spasm side (3 vs .8%; P = .009). Hand dominance was determined as an independent predictor of radial artery spasm (P = .006). In our study, RAS and RAO were more common on the dominant hand side than on the non-dominant side. Choosing the non-dominant hand for TRA for CC may reduce the incidence of RAS and RAO.

The Zoom RDL radial access system for neurointervention: An early single-center experience

BACKGROUND

The transradial approach (TRA) for neurointerventional procedures is increasingly being used given its technical feasibility and safety. However, catheter trackability and device deliverability are reported barriers to TRA adoption.

METHODS

This is the first report describing the technical feasibility and performance of using the Zoom RDL Radial Access System (Imperative Care, Inc., Campbell, CA) in 29 patients who underwent neurointerventional procedures from October 2022 to January 2023 in a single-center institution.

RESULTS

Mean age of the study population was 61.9±17.2 years, 79.3% were male (23/29), and 62.1% were black (18/29). The most common procedures were stroke thrombectomy (31.0%, 9/29) and aneurysm embolization (27.6%, 8/29). All the stroke thrombectomy procedures were successfully performed; first-pass effect rate (mTICI≥2 c in one pass) was achieved in 66.7% (6/9) of cases. We used TRA in 86.2% of cases (25/29), including distal radial/snuffbox access in 31.0% (9/29) of cases. The radial diameter was >2 mm for all cases. An intermediate/aspiration catheter was used in 89.7% (26/29) of cases. Access success was achieved in 89.7% of cases (26/29); two cases required conversion from TRA to transfemoral approach (6.9%) and one case required conversion to a different guide catheter (3.4%). There were no access site complications or other Zoom RDL-related complications. One intracerebral hemorrhage, and one procedure-related thrombus were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of Zoom RDL Radial Access System is technically feasible and effective for complex neurointerventional procedures with low complication rates.

TRUST Technique for Neurointervention: A Promising Alternative for Complex Cases

BACKGROUND

Neurointervention via Transradial Access (TRA) is becoming increasingly popular as experience with this technique increases. However, approximately 8.6-10.3% of complex TRA cases are converted to femoral access due to a lack of support or radial artery spasm. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the TRUST (trans-radial coaxial catheter technique using a short sheath, Simmons catheter, and Tethys intermediate catheter) technique in interventional procedures via TRA.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective analysis of 16 patients admitted to our institute between January 2023 to May 2023 to undergo endovascular interventions with the TRUST technique via the TRA.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study population was 63.8 years, and 62.5% were male (10/16). The most common procedure was intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (93.75%, 15/16). All procedures were performed successfully, and the most common procedures in our cohort were ballooning (50.0%, 8/16), stenting (18.75%, 3/16), and both procedures combined (31.25%, 1/16). All procedures were performed using the TRA, and the distal and proximal radial arteries were used for access in 31.35% (5/16) and 68.75% (11/16) of the cases, respectively. Technical success was achieved in all patients and most cases demonstrated mTICI ≥2b recanalization (93.75%, 15/16). In this case, no major access-site complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

The TRUST technique is technically safe and feasible and had a high technical success rate and low complication rate in our study. These results demonstrate that the TRUST technique is a promising alternative for patients undergoing complex neurointerventions.

Predictors of radial to femoral artery crossover during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In contrast to traditional femoral artery access, radial artery access for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with reduced mortality and bleeding but has higher crossover rates. Therefore, factors associated with crossover warrant exploration as crossover due to technical challenges associated with the radial route may be mitigated.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to identify predictors of radial access failure or crossover to femoral access in PPCI.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Systematic Reviews Checklist with searches conducted in Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and SCOPUS databases. Inclusion criteria for this study included patients with STEMI; PPCI; and primary research identifying predictors of radial access failures and/or crossovers, published in English, and after 2010. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020167122). Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 26.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) and RevMan version 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom) with meta-analysis conducted by using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects method. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies was utilised for quality and risk of bias assessment, with EndNote software used for citations.

RESULTS

Eight observational studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 12,621 patients. Risk of bias of these studies was assessed using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. The mean age was 61.2 ± 12.0 years, and 75.3% were male. Crossover from transradial to transfemoral artery occurred in 529 (4.2%) patients. Reasons for radial access failure included failed puncture (35.3%), peripheral occlusion or tortuosity (24.5%), and radial artery spasm (20.1%). Predictors of crossover included older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-2.65; p < 0.001), female sex (OR, 2.10; 95% Cl, 1.58-2.80; p < 0.001), weight ≤65 kg (OR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.95-4.46; p < 0.001), and previous percutaneous coronary intervention (OR, 2.80; 95% Cl, 1.74-4.52; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Older age, female sex, weight ≤65 kg, and previous percutaneous coronary intervention were predictors of crossover or failure from the radial to femoral artery. As these predictors are known to be associated with high bleeding and mortality, they should not preclude attempting a radial-first approach in all patients with STEMI. However, as these results were unadjusted, this study warrants further research to thoroughly investigate predictors of radial artery crossover.

Alternative access for peripheral vascular interventions

Percutaneous endovascular interventions for advanced lower extremity peripheral arterial disease are becoming increasingly used, often as first-line treatment of chronic limb threatening ischemia. Advancements in endovascular techniques have provided safe and effective alternative revascularization options, especially for high-risk surgical patients. Although the classic transfemoral approach results in high technical success and patency rates, an estimated 20% of lesions remain challenging to access via an antegrade approach. As such, alternative access sites are important in the endovascular armamentarium for the management of chronic limb threatening ischemia. The goal of this review is to discuss alternative access sites, specifically the transradial, transpopliteal, and transpedal approaches, in addition to transbrachial and transaxillary access, and their outcomes in peripheral arterial disease and limb salvage.

Finger exercise could reduce painfulness and radial artery complications related to coronary artery angiography

OBJECTIVE

To estimate if applying a finger exercise during trans-radial coronary artery angiography (CAG) could help to reduce a patient's painfulness and evaluate its protective effects against radial artery complications.

METHODS

This is a prospective, controlled, single-center trial. Overall, 390 patients who underwent coronary angiography through radial path in our hospital during 2022 were randomized 1 : 1 to the following two groups: test group: finger exercise in addition to routine perioperative care; control group: routine care. The success rate of radial puncture, the incidence of procedural radial artery dissection (RAD) and radial artery spasm (RAS), change of wrist circumference, pain degree related to the operation, occurrence of access site hemorrhagic complications, hemostasis time and postprocedure occurrence of radial artery occlusion (RAO) before discharge were recorded and compared between two groups.

RESULTS

Compared to the control group, the test group had a higher success rate of radial puncture, lower incidence of RAS, RAD and RAO, slighter swelling of wrist and patients who felt less pain in the test group. There was no difference in prolonged hemostasis time or hemorrhagic complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Finger exercise could help to make a patient more comfortable and reduce radial artery complications related to CAG.

Risk factors for radial artery occlusion after neurointervention for unruptured intracranial aneurysm via transradial access

PURPOSE

Neurointervention via transradial access (TRA) is less invasive than via transfemoral access. However, radial artery occlusion (RAO) may occur with TRA. The purpose of this study was to explore risk factors for RAO after coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) via TRA.

METHODS

Forty-two consecutive patients who underwent coil embolization for UIAs via TRA between March 2021 and March 2022 and were available for angiographic evaluation 1 year after treatment were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify potential risk factors for RAO.

RESULTS

Seventeen (40%) of the 42 patients showed RAO. Compared with the non-RAO group, radial artery size was significantly smaller (2.2 mm [interquartile range (IQR): 2.1, 2.4 mm] vs 2.6 mm [IQR: 2.5, 2.7 mm]; p = 0.001) and the incidence of radial artery spasm (RAS) was significantly higher in the RAO group. Multivariate analysis identified radial artery size (odds ratio [OR] 4.9 × 10^-3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.4 × 10^-5-0.38) and incidence of RAS (OR 14.8, 95%CI 2.1-105) as significant independent predictors of subsequent RAO. Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the optimal cutoff for radial artery size was 2.5 mm (sensitivity, 82.4%; specificity, 76.0%; area under the ROC curve, 0.80 [95%CI 0.66-0.95]).

CONCLUSION

Radial artery size and RAS represent reliable parameters for predicting RAO 1 year after coil embolization for UIA via TRA. Prophylaxis against RAS and limiting neurointervention via TRA to patients with radial artery larger than 2.5 mm in diameter may reduce the risk of postoperative RAO.

All that glitters: case presentation and review of radial access complications in neurointervention

Radial artery access has experienced increasing adoption and rapid expansion of indications for neurointerventional procedures. This access is an attractive neurointervention route to be considered, with many advantages over the traditional femoral access in terms of ease of vasculature navigation and decreased risk of complications such as significant bleeding. Although a promising technique for neurointerventional procedures, there are inherent and unique considerations as well as potential complications involved. The following case report highlights some of these vital concepts associated with radial artery access, including appropriate patient selection as well as assessment of arterial size in the context of neurointerventional techniques. Early identification of complications such as arterial injury and compartment syndrome, with an emphasis on appropriate draping and inter-procedure monitoring, is discussed as well as approaches for subsequent management. Finally, the issue of radiation safety in this emerging technique is considered. These concepts are critical for the successful use and the continued growth of radial artery access for neurointervention procedures.

Combination Therapy With Nicardipine and Isosorbide Dinitrate to Prevent Spasm in Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from the NISTRA Multicenter Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial)

Verapamil and nitroglycerin are widely used to prevent radial artery spasm (RAS) during percutaneous cardiovascular procedures. However, these agents are not typically available in most African countries and consequently, isosorbide dinitrate is often the only spasmolytic treatment. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of isosorbide dinitrate alone versus isosorbide dinitrate used together with nicardipine to prevent RAS during transradial coronary procedures. This was a randomized controlled double-blind multicenter trial. Patients (n = 1,523) were randomized to receive either a sole therapy of isosorbide dinitrate (n = 760) or the combination of isosorbide dinitrate and nicardipine (n = 763). Our primary end point was the occurrence of RAS; defined as considerable perceived hindrance of catheter advancement. Our secondary end points were severe RAS; defined as (1) severe arm pain, (2) the need for either morphine or midazolam treatment, and (3) necessity for crossover to the contralateral radial or femoral artery. RAS incidence was reduced with the combination therapy versus isosorbide dinitrate alone (15% vs 25%, p <0.001), with a number needed to treat of 10 patients. There was also a significant reduction in the incidence of the secondary end points with combination therapy (3.6% vs 8.2%, p <0.001), with a number needed to treat of 22 patients. This result was driven by reductions in both femoral crossover (0.5% vs 2.4%, p = 0.003) and the use of morphine or midazolam injections (1.6% vs 3.5%, p = 0.02) with combination therapy. In conclusion, we demonstrated the superiority of the combination therapy of isosorbide dinitrate and nicardipine over isosorbide dinitrate alone in reducing the incidence of RAS.

Effect of randomized prophylactic nitroglycerin on radial artery spasm during transradial catheterization: An analysis based on operator experience

One limitation to transradial access (TRA) is the occurrence of spasms (RAS), for which the use of prophylactic medications is recommended. Improvement in TRA material combined with the increase in operators' expertise, might mitigate this benefit. We assess the effect of preventive nitroglycerin on RAS during TRA, evaluating the role of the operator's experience. Patients received 500 μg nitroglycerin or placebo. The operator's expertise was classified as: inexperienced (I), intermediate (M), and experienced (E). 2040 patients were included. Prophylactic use of nitroglycerin did not reduce RAS (10.8% vs. 13.4% (placebo), p = 0.07). RAS incidence was 14.5% in I, 12.5% in M, and 9.7% in E (p = 0.01). In group I, nitroglycerin reduced RAS (17.4% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.04), which was not observed in other groups. Overall, nitroglycerin does not prevent RAS, which is more common among inexperienced operators. More experienced operators could abolish preventive nitroglycerin use.

The anatomical snuffbox for transradial access in arteriovenous fistula intervention: Case report and brief review of the literature

Left distal transradial artery (dTRA) access in the anatomical snuffbox is a relatively novel technique and is considered beneficial when left TRA access is required. This technique offers essential advantages, including improved patient comfort and lower vascular complications. dTRA may provide an entry site for retrograde recanalization of the radial artery. We presented a case of a 65-year-old man with 5-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) and had left a radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for routine hemodialysis. There was obstruction of AVF a month after creation. The vascular intervention has been performed using left dTRA access for retrograde recanalization. Angiogram showed cephalic vein obstruction and non-significant stenosis of the proximal radial artery. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was successful in improving cephalic vein flow. Hemostatic performed without a hemostatic device. This case report highlights the dTRA access approach in the anatomical snuffbox to recanalize AVF occlusion in the wrist in a patient with CKD.

Brachial Plexus Block for Removal of Retained Radial Artery Sheath

In this case, we present a lesser-known application of regional anesthesia, specifically, managing a patient with vasospasm and retained radial artery (RA) vascular sheath after coronary angiography. Providing an ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block, in combination with general anesthesia, allowed the proceduralist to remove the retained sheath after several hours of failed treatment and manipulation. Severe arterial spasm was alleviated by eliciting a sympathectomy, along with analgesia of the right upper extremity, and maintaining this post-procedure. The block optimized arterial flow through the RA post-intervention and helped manage the patients' pain from manipulation.

Radial Artery Access Complications: Prevention, Diagnosis and Management

The transradial approach for cardiac catheterization, coronary angiography, and percutaneous intervention is associated with a lower risk of access site-related complications compared to the transfemoral approach. However, with increasing utilization of transradial access for not only coronary procedures but also peripheral vascular procedures, healthcare personnel are more likely to encounter radial access site complications, which can be associated with morbidity and mortality. There is significant heterogeneity in the reporting of incidence, manifestations, and management of radial access site complications, at least partly due to vague presentation and under-diagnosis. Therefore, physicians performing procedures via transradial access should be aware of possible complications and remain vigilant to prevent their occurrence. Intraprocedural complications of transradial access procedures, which include spasm, catheter kinking, and arterial dissection or perforation, may lead to patient discomfort, increased procedure time, and a higher rate of access site cross over. Post-procedural complications such as radial artery occlusion, hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, or nerve injury could lead to patient discomfort and limb dysfunction. When radial access site complications occur, comprehensive evaluation and prompt treatment is necessary to reduce long-term consequences. In this report, we review the incidence, clinical factors, and management strategies for radial access site complications associated with cardiac catheterization.

Intraarterial papaverine for relief of catheter-induced peripheral arterial vasospasm during pediatric cardiac surgery: A randomized double-blind controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Maintaining the patency of peripheral arterial lines in pediatric patients during surgery can be challenging due to multiple factors, and catheter-related arterial vasospasm is a potentially modifiable cause. Papaverine, a potent vasodilator, improves arterial line patency when used as a continuous infusion in the pediatric intensive care setting, but this method is not convenient during surgery.

AIM

Extrapolating from the benefit seen in the intensive care unit, the authors hypothesize that a small-volume intraarterial bolus of papaverine immediately after arterial line placement will reduce vasospasm-related arterial line malfunction.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Patients less than 17 years of age undergoing cardiac surgery were enrolled. Patients were randomized into the heparin or papaverine groups. Immediately after arterial line insertion, an intraarterial bolus of heparin (2 units/ml, 1 ml) or papaverine (0.12 mg/ml, 1 ml) was administered (T1, Figure 1). An optimal waveform was defined as the ease of aspirating a standardized blood sample within 30 s, absence of cavitation when sampling, absence of color change at the catheter site during injection, and presence of a dicrotic notch. The primary outcome evaluated was the presence of an optimal arterial waveform at 5 min after the first randomized dose (T1 + 5 min). The secondary outcomes were the presence of optimal arterial waveform an hour after the first dose and the ability of papaverine to rescue suboptimal waveforms.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were enrolled in the study. Twelve patients were excluded from the analysis. Complete datasets after randomization were available in 88 patients (heparin group, n = 46; papaverine group, n = 42). At baseline, groups were similar for age, weight, arterial vessel size, and arterial line patency. At T1 + 5 min, an improvement in the waveform characteristics was observed in the papaverine group (heparin,39% [8/46] vs. papaverine, 64% [27/42]; p = .02; odds ratio, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2 to 6.6, Figure 3, Table 2). At the end of 1 h, both groups showed continued improvement in arterial line patency. After the second dose, a higher number of patients in the heparin group had suboptimal waveforms and were treated with papaverine (heparin,37% [17/46] vs. papaverine,17% [7/42], p = .05). Patients in the heparin group treated with papaverine showed significant improvement in patency (13/17 vs. 3/7, p = .01). No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric patients, papaverine injection immediately after peripheral arterial catheter placement was associated with relief of vasospasm and improved initial arterial line patency. Further, papaverine can be used as a rescue to improve and maintain arterial line patency.

Randomized Clinical Trial on Prevention of Radial Occlusion After Transradial Access Using Nitroglycerin: PATENS Trial

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether administration of nitroglycerin at the beginning or end of a transradial approach (TRA) procedure would preserve radial patency.

BACKGROUND

The TRA is becoming the preferred vascular access route in coronary interventions. Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is the most frequent complication. Routine vasodilator treatment aims to reduce spasm and possibly prevent RAO.

METHODS

The authors designed a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 2-by-2 factorial, placebo-controlled trial encompassing patients undergoing the TRA. Patients were randomized to either 500 μg nitroglycerin or placebo; each arm was also subrandomized to early (upon sheath insertion) or late (right before sheath removal) nitroglycerin administration to evaluate the superiority of nitroglycerin in the prevention of RAO with 24 hours on Doppler ultrasound.

RESULTS

A total of 2,040 patients were enrolled. RAO occurred in 49 patients (2.4%). Fifteen of these patients (30.6%) showed re-establishment of flow at 30 days. Nitroglycerin, compared with placebo, did not reduce the risk for RAO at either of the 2 time points (early, 2.5% vs 2.3% [P = 0.66]; late, 2.3% vs 2.5% [P = 0.66]). By multivariable analysis, the presence of spasm (OR: 3.53; 95% CI: 1.87-6.65; P < 0.001) and access achieved with more than 1 puncture attempt (OR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.43-4.66; P = 0.002) were independent predictors of RAO.

CONCLUSIONS

The routine use of nitroglycerin was not associated with a reduction in the rate of RAO, regardless of the time of administration (at the beginning or end of the TRA procedure).

Initial Experience Using the Transradial Approach for Endovascular Treatment of Vascular Pathologies: Safety and Feasibility

Background  Endovascular treatment of vascular pathologies through the transradial approach has been increasingly used and has demonstrated a low rate of complications.

Objective  To report our initial experience in the endovascular treatment of cerebrovascular diseases with the transradial approach and to determine its safety and feasibility.

Methods  Consecutive patients who underwent the transradial approach for endovascular treatment of aneurysms and vascular malformations were reviewed at a single institution. Technical success, fluoroscopy time, and access-related complications were analyzed.

Results  Eight patients underwent endovascular treatment with the transradial approach. One arteriovenous fistula, one superficial temporal artery aneurysm, three arteriovenous malformations, and four aneurysms were treated successfully. The radial artery was successfully approached and a 6-F sheath was used in all the cases. Navigation of guiding catheters (5 and 6 F) was done without complications. The most commonly approached artery was the right internal carotid artery, followed by the right vertebral artery. Postoperative vasospasm was identified in three patients. Mean fluoroscopy time was 34.7 minutes. Conversion to transfemoral approach was not required. No postoperative complications were reported.

Conclusions  In our initial experience, the transradial approach is a safe and feasible alternative for the endovascular treatment of cerebrovascular pathologies.

Transradial versus transfemoral access for acute stroke endovascular thrombectomy: a 4-year experience in a high-volume center

PURPOSE

To compare clinical outcomes and safety of transradial (TRA) versus transfemoral access (TFA) for endovascular mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 832 consecutive patients with acute stroke undergoing interventional thrombectomy using TRA (n = 64) or TFA (n = 768).

RESULTS

Direct TFA failures occurred in 36 patients, 18 of which underwent crossover TFA to TRA, while direct TRA failures occurred in 2 patients having both crossovers to TFA. Successful catheterization was achieved in 96.8% (62/64) and 95.3% (732/768) of patients undergoing direct TRA and direct TFA, respectively, without significant differences. The median (IQR) catheterization time was 10 (8-16) min in the direct TRA group and 15 (10-20) in the direct TFA group (P < 0.001). This difference was also significant in the subgroup of anterior circulation strokes and in patients younger and older than 80 years of age. The majority of procedures yielded thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grade 2b/2c/3 revascularization in patients undergoing direct TRA (88.5%) and direct TFA (90.8%), without statistically significant differences. The median (IQR) puncture to recanalization time was 37 (24-58) min for the direct TRA group and 42 (28-70) min for the direct TFA group. Significant differences in access site complications, symptomatic ICH, and mRS score 0-2 at 90 days between both TRA and TFA accesses were not found.

CONCLUSIONS

TRA is not inferior to TFA in the probability of catheterization, times of catheterization and revascularization, and other clinical outcomes for mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke.

Heme Effects in Lowering Patient Discomfort in Radial Artery Verapamil Injection

Background

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether diluting verapamil with heme as compared to normal saline reduces patient discomfort during radial artery injection. Following radial artery access, verapamil is frequently administered to reduce the incidence of radial artery spasm. The injection of verapamil via the radial artery is associated with a temporary “burning” discomfort. It has been hypothesized that the dilution of verapamil with heme rather than saline leads to less patient discomfort during administration.

Methods

This prospective, single-center, randomized study enrolled patients undergoing coronary angiography via radial artery access between August 2017 and April 2018. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either verapamil/heme or verapamil/saline administration. Patient discomfort was assessed at the time of injection, and 1-h post procedure.

Results

A total of 214 patients were enrolled in the study. Of these, 103 patients were included in the verapamil/heme group and 100 in the verapamil/saline group. For the primary objectives, there were no statistically significant differences in patient discomfort at the time of verapamil injection (P = 0.15), or 1-h post injection (P = 0.48). However, in the verapamil/heme group, there was a trend towards a lower post-injection pain score (M = 2.83, standard deviation (SD) = 3.18) compared to the verapamil/saline group (M = 3.48, SD = 3.01) (P = 0.15).

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in immediate or 1-h post-procedure patient discomfort with verapamil diluted with heme as compared to dilution with saline. While there was a trend towards lower immediate patient discomfort in the verapamil/heme group, larger studies are needed to further evaluate this trend.

Effect of intra-arterial vasodilator administration during radial artery access on systemic blood pressure in patients receiving moderate sedation

PURPOSE

The hemodynamic effects of intra-arterial vasodilator administration for the prevention of radial artery spasm during transradial access have not been well characterized. This study evaluates the effect of intra-arterial Verapamil and Nitroglycerine administration on systemic blood pressure and its correlation with timing of moderate sedation administration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board approval was granted. Patients who underwent transradial access from 4/2018 to 4/2019 and received both intra-arterial vasodilators and moderate sedation were identified and their electronic medical records reviewed. Patients were divided into three cohorts based on the timing of sedation and intra-arterial vasodilator administration. Decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP) was expressed as means with standard deviation which were then compared using Student's t-test.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients who met inclusion criteria demonstrated an overall mean decrease in SBP of 16.45 mmHg ± 15.45 mmHg. Patients receiving sedation and intra-arterial vasodilators within their expected peak SBP effect times had similar SBP change following the intra-arterial vasodilators as those in whom the interval was greater than 10 min (4.2 mmHg; 95% CI (-4.11 to 12.52), p = 0.3171). Two patients experienced asymptomatic hypotension.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing transradial access for procedures utilizing moderate sedation can safely receive intra-arterial Verapamil and Nitroglycerine for prevention of radial artery spasm.

Radial artery dilatation to improve access and lower complications during coronary angiography: the RADIAL trial

AIMS

The aim of this study was to explore the use of prolonged occlusion flow-mediated dilatation (PO-FMD) to dilate the radial artery prior to cannulation to increase cannulation success, reduce puncture attempts and reduce access-site complications in transradial coronary angiography.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 1,156 patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography were randomised into PO-FMD and sham PO-FMD groups. PO-FMD was achieved by a 10-minute inflation of a blood pressure cuff on the arm to above systolic pressure, followed by deflation with resultant radial artery dilation. In the sham PO-FMD group the cuff was not inflated. Operators were blinded to the intervention. Five hundred and eighty (580) patients were randomised to the sham PO-FMD group and 576 to the PO-FMD group. Cannulation failure was reduced with PO-FMD, with cannulation failure rates of 2.7% in the PO-FMD group and 5.8% in the sham PO-FMD group (p=0.01).The number of puncture attempts was reduced with the use of PO-FMD, with a median of one attempt in the PO-FMD group and two in the sham PO-FMD group (p<0.001). Radial artery pulsation loss (RAPL) was reduced with PO-FMD, with 1.4% in the PO-FMD group and 3.8% in the sham PO-FMD group (p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

PO-FMD reduces cannulation failure rates, decreases puncture attempts, and decreases RAPL during transradial coronary angiography.

Double-blind, single-center, randomized study evaluating the effectiveness of Isosorbide Mononitrate in preventing radial artery occlusion compared to placebo in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary procedure: study protocol

Objectives: The primary objective of this study will be to evaluate the efficacy of subcutaneous and peri-arterial isosorbide mononitrate in preventing occlusion of the radial artery (ORA) after percutaneous coronary procedures (PCP) performed by the transradial approach (TRA). As secondary objectives, define the incidence of ORA in the institution and assess variables related to the risk of occlusion. Methods: Single-center, double-blind, randomized study, including in- and outpatients from a high complexity hospital, admitted to performing PCP, diagnostic or therapeutic, by TRA, in stable coronary conditions (elective) or acute coronary syndrome. The sample will be randomly divided into a group that will receive the medication and a control group. All participants will be submitted to palpatory assessment of radial artery patency and the Barbeau inverse test within 24 h and seven days after the procedure. This will be the first study to evaluate isosorbide mononitrate as an accessible and inexpensive pharmacological method for preventing OAR after PCP by VTR.

Vascular Complications of Transradial Access for Cardiac Catheterization

Transradial access has been increasingly adopted for cardiac catheterization. It is crucial for operators to recognize potential vascular complications associated with radial artery access. Prevention, early detection, and prompt treatment of vascular complications are essential to prevent serious morbidities. This review aims to raise awareness of transradial access vascular complications. Radial artery spasm is treated with intra-arterial verapamil and/or nitroglycerine. Hemorrhagic complications, such as perforation, hematoma, arteriovenous fistula, and pseudoaneurysm, are treated with prolonged compression. Patent hemostasis and adequate anticoagulation are used to prevent radial artery occlusion. Hand ischemia is a rare complication not associated with abnormal results of the Allen or Barbeau test, and can be treated with intraarterial verapamil, IV heparin, and IV diltiazem. Finally, an attentive monitoring protocol for the timely detection of vascular complications should be implemented in daily practice.

The Impact of Using a Larger Forearm Artery for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions on Hand Strength: A Randomized Controlled Trial

(1) Background: The exact mechanism underlying hand strength reduction (HSR) after coronary angiography with transradial access (TRA) or transulnar access (TUA) remains unknown. (2) Methods: This study aimed to assess the impact of using a larger or smaller forearm artery access on the incidence of HSR at 30-day follow-up. This was a prospective randomized trial including patients referred for elective coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. Based on the pre-procedural ultrasound examination, the larger artery was identified. Patients were randomized to larger radial artery (RA) or ulnar artery (UA) or a group with smaller RA/UA. The primary endpoint was the incidence of HSR, while the secondary endpoint was the incidence of subjective HSR, paresthesia, and any hand pain. (3) Results: We enrolled 200 patients (107 men and 93 women; mean age 68 ± 8 years) between 2017 and 2018. Due to crossover between TRA and TUA, there were 57% (n = 115) patients in larger RA/UA and 43% (n = 85) patients in smaller RA/UA. HSR occurred in 29% (n = 33) patients in larger RA/UA and 47% (n = 40) patients in smaller RA/UA (p = 0.008). Subjective HSR was observed in 10% (n = 12) patients in larger RA/UA and 21% (n = 18) patients in smaller RA/UA (p = 0.03). Finally, paresthesia was noted in 7% (n = 8) patients in larger RA/UA and 22% (n = 15) in smaller RA/UA (p = 002). Independent factors of HSR were larger RA/UA (OR 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24-0.82; p < 0.01) and the use of TRA (OR 1.87; 95% CI, 1.01-34; p < 0.05). (4) Conclusions: The use of a larger artery as vascular access was associated with a lower incidence of HSR at 30-day follow-up.

Early experience with a novel 088 long sheath in transradial neurointerventions

BACKGROUND

Transradial access (TRA) for neuroendovascular procedures has several clear benefits compared to transfemoral access. In this study, we report our initial experience with neuroendovascular procedures performed via transradial access using the novel Ballast 088 long sheath.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis and identified 91 consecutive patients who underwent neuroendovascular procedures via TRA using the Ballast 088 long sheath. Data collection was performed on indication for procedure, number of vessels selectively catheterized, fluoroscopy time, procedure duration, radiation exposure, failure of radial access and conversion to transfemoral access, periprocedural complications, and procedural outcomes.

RESULTS

Amongst 91 patients, the average age was 65.5 years ± 14.2 with 45 (49.5 %) female patients. 25 (27.5 %) patients underwent aneurysm treatment, 2 (2.2 %) AVM/AVF embolization, 28 (30.8 %) intracranial or extracranial stenting, 31 (34.1 %) stroke treatment, and 5 (5.5 %) underwent diagnostic angiogram. The mean number of target vessels catheterized was 1.07 ± 0.25, the mean procedure duration (minutes) was 96.5 ± 57.2, mean fluoroscopy time (minutes) was 21.9 ± 14.2, mean contrast dose (ml) was 112.7 ± 66.7, and mean radiation exposure (Gycm2) was 54.82 ± 41.37. The success rate of target vessel catheterization was 100 %. There were no complications resulting in long term sequelae. Access complications occurred in 1 (1.1 %) patients. Transfemoral conversion was required in 3 (3.3 %) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The Ballast 088 long sheath is safe and effective for TRA in neuroendovascular procedures with a low rate of complications and conversion.

Novel combined topical gel of lidocaine-verapamil-nitroglycerin can dilate the radial artery and reduce radial pain during trans-radial angioplasty

Introduction

Radial approach for coronary angioplasty is accepted by many specialists in medical centers around the world. The use of radial access is associated with fewer vascular complications and the same success rate in comparison with traditional femoral access. Radial artery spasm is one of the main concerns in this method. The small size of the radial artery and high density of alpha-1 adrenergic receptors in this artery can accelerate the spasm. The objects of this study were to evaluate whether the combined topical gel of lidocaine–verapamil–nitroglycerin could dilate the radial artery and reduce patient pain and sympathetic response during radial puncture.

Methods

Patients undergoing elective trans-radial angioplasty were randomized to either placebo or therapeutic gel group in single-center, double-blind study. Placebo or therapeutic gel applied 1 cm proximal to the radial styloid process. Radial artery size was measured by ultrasound. Radial pain was reported by the visual analog scale (VAS) and the sympathetic response was assessed by changes in systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate (HR). The incidence of spasm was defined by the radial artery spasm score.

Results

60 patients (30 patients in each group) participated in this study. A significant increase in the size of the radial artery was observed in the group receiving therapeutic gel compared to the placebo group (mean diameter, mm: 2.95 ± 0.48 vs. 2.54 ± 0.43, p = 0.001; area, cm²: 0.07 vs. 0.05, p = 0.001). During radial puncture, the radial pain intensity was significantly decreased in patients receiving therapeutic gel (4 (1–5) vs. 2 (1–2), p = 0.003). Radial artery spasm didn’t happen in any group.

Conclusion

Based on our results, Pre-procedural administration of combined topical gel of verapamil-nitroglycerin-lidocaine significantly increases the size of the radial artery and effectively reduces the radial pain during radial puncture in patients undergoing trans-radial angioplasty.

Radial Access for Neurointerventions

Transradial access (TRA) has become the standard approach for cardiac intervention, with a large body of evidence demonstrating a lower incidence of vascular complications, better patient experience and cost reduction. There has been increasing interest in using TRA both for diagnostic neuroangiography and for interventional neurovascular procedures. This aim of this article is to discuss the advantages and limitations of TRA for neurointerventions. General technical details, such as pre-procedure recommendations, prevention of spasm and occlusion, haemostasis protocols and distal TRA puncture, are also described, along with the specific technical details of TRA for aneurysm embolisation, stroke thrombectomy and other neurovascular interventions. TRA provides additional tools to the neurointerventionist and – with appropriate training – the whole spectrum of intervention procedures can be achieved using this approach.

Radial artery occlusion after cardiac catheterization and impact of medical treatment

Summary: Background: The transradial artery approach is the preferred access for cardiac catheterization according to current guidelines. However, the most common complication is radial artery occlusion (RAO). Despite the rare indication for surgical reopening, the occluded radial artery is not available for further procedures or as a potential bypass graft. Still, treatment regimens for RAO are scarce. We now determined whether the addition of antithrombotic to antiplatelet therapy improves the rate of partial or complete regain of patency in RAO following transradial cardiac catheterization in a retrospective analysis. Patients and methods: In a two-center tertiary referral hospital retrospective analysis 4135 files of patients who had undergone transradial catheterization were screened for documented RAO. 141 patients were identified and 138 patients with complete information on the medical regimen and ultrasound examinations for a maximum of 3 months were included in the analysis, whereas 3 patients were excluded due to missing or incomplete follow-up information. Results: 3.3% of all patients that had undergone transradial catheterization featured an oligosymptomatic RAO, confirmed by color-coded duplex sonography. 21% of patients with additional anticoagulation regained full patency vs. 9% without additional anticoagulation (p = 0.07). 40% of patients with anticoagulation featured a partial or full regain of patency vs. 16% of patients without additional anticoagulation for a maximum of 3 months treatment (p = 0.006). No major bleedings were reported during the follow-up visits. Conclusions: RAO remains a rare complication of cardiac catheterization. The addition of antithrombotic therapy for 3 months appears to safely improve the partial or even full regain of radial patency in case of postinterventional RAO.

Algorithms for challenging scenarios encountered in transradial intervention

Transradial intervention (TRI) was first introduced by Lucien Campeau in 1989 and since then has created a lasting impact in the field of interventional cardiology. Several studies have demonstrated that TRI is associated with fewer vascular site complications, offer earlier ambulation and greater post-procedural comfort. Patients presenting with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) have experienced survival benefit and higher quality-of-life metrics as well with TRI. While both the updated scientific statement by the American Heart Association and the 2017 European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend a “radial first” approach there appears to be a lag in physicians adapting TRI as the preferred vascular access. We present a review focusing on identification and management of TRA related challenges and complications using a systematic algorithmic approach.

Transradial approach and its variations for neurointerventional procedures: Literature review

Background:

The transfemoral approach (TFA) has been the standard in neuroradiology over the years. However, the transradial approach (TRA) and its variants offer several benefits over the TFA.

Methods:

Review of the literature about TRA and its variations. We present our results for different neurointerventional procedures at our institution between January 2018 and December 2019.

Results:

We wrote an educational review describing anatomical and technical aspects, advantages, and complications of this approach. In the past year we increased the percentage of neurointerventional procedures performed through radial or ulnar arteries.

Conclusion:

There are clearly proven benefits of employing a wrist approach in patients for neurointerventional procedures and its utilization should especially be considered on a daily basis.

Safety and feasibility of ulnar artery access for neuroangiography and neurointervention: a case series

BACKGROUND

Radial access has become popular among neurointerventionalists because it has favorable risk profiles compared with femoral access. Difficulties in accessing or navigating the radial artery have been viewed as a reason to convert to femoral access, but ulnar artery access may prevent complications associated with transfemoral procedures.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of ulnar access for neurointerventions and diagnostic neuroangiographic procedures.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent diagnostic angiography or neurointerventional procedures via ulnar access between July 1, 2019 and April 15, 2020 were included. Data recorded were demographics, procedure indication, devices, technique, and complications. Descriptive analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Ulnar artery access was obtained for 21 procedures in 18 patients (mean age 70.3±7.8 years; nine men). Procedures included 13 diagnostic angiograms and eight neurointerventions (3 left middle meningeal artery embolization, 1 of which was aborted; 2 carotid artery stenting; 2 angioplasty; 1 mechanical thrombectomy for in-stent thrombosis). A right-sided approach with ultrasound guidance was used for all cases except one. Indications included small caliber radial artery (n=9), radial artery occlusion (n=10), and radial artery preservation for potential bypass (n=2). A 5-French slender sheath was used for diagnostic angiography; a 6-French slender sheath was used for neurointerventions. No case required conversion to femoral access. Two patients had minor hematomas after the procedure; one other had ulnar artery occlusion on 30-day ultrasonography.

CONCLUSION

Ulnar access is safe and feasible for diagnostic and interventional neuroangiographic procedures. It provides a useful alternative to radial access, potentially avoiding complications associated with femoral access.

Intra-Arterial Labetalol and Nitroglycerin in Preventing Radial Artery Spasm Following Transradial Angiography: A New Approach

Background: Radial artery spasm (RAS) resulted from decreasing blood flow and activation of vasomotor system leads to a decrease in artery diameter, perfusion and patency, and increase the risk of procedure failure. In this study, we investigated the effects of intra-arterial administration of nitroglycerin and labetalol on radial artery diameter, RAS, and pain intensity in patients undergoing diagnostic radial angiography. Methods: Sixty-four patients randomly enrolled into one of the nitroglycerin (150 μg) or labetalol (500 μg) groups. The radial artery size, and the incidence of RAS were measured before, immediately after puncture, and at the end of treatment. Pain intensity was evaluated using a visual-analog-scale (VAS) at the end of the procedure. Hemodynamic status before, and during the procedure was also recorded. Results: Labetalol causes a significantly larger increase in radial diameter than nitroglycerin immediately after intra-arterial injection (2.24±0.58 mm vs. 1.65±0.39 mm, P-value<0.001). The rate of RAS immediately after vasodilator administration in the labetalol group was 3.1% vs. 12.5% in the nitroglycerin group (P-value=0.355), but the overall incidence (immediately after administration+ at the end of procedure) did not show a statistically significant difference (53.125% vs 31.25% respectively, P-value=0.076). The VAS score did not show a significant difference between two groups (1.15±0.44 in nitroglycerin vs. 1.50±0.91, P-value=0.063). Conclusion: Labetalol increases radial artery diameter more than nitroglycerin. However, the efficacy of labetalol in terms of RAS incidence, and patients’ pain was similar to nitroglycerin. Therefore, intra-arterial labetalol could be considered as one of the therapeutic options in clinical practice in order to reduce RAS and procedure failure.

Effect of Vasodilatory Medications on Blood Pressure in Patients Undergoing Transradial Coronary Angiography: A Comparative Study

Background:

In patients undergoing coronary intervention, different vasodilators are used to prevent the radial artery spasm (RAS). To date, no studies investigated the effect of these vasodilators in blood pressure (BP) reduction.

Aim:

The study aimed to investigate and compare the effect of vasodilatory medications on BP reduction in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography procedure.

Methods:

We consecutively included 300 patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography procedures and randomly assigned them into three equal groups to compare the effect of verapamil (2.5 mg), nitroglycerin (200 μg), and combination (verapamil 2.5 mg with nitroglycerin 200 (μg) was diluted in 5 ml of normal saline and given through radial sheath. Changes in the BP, heart rate (HR), and other clinical parameters were assessed and presented as standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ANOVA test was performed to analyze the differences in the BP and other clinical parameters between the three groups.

Results:

Overall, the mean age of the study population was 53.26 years (standard deviation: 9.27), male patients (84%), with dyslipidemia (62.6%), and diabetes (45%). At baseline, the mean systolic BP (SBP) was 150.91 ± 31.66 mmHg, HR (72.34 ± 12.71 beats/min). After the administration of vasodilators, the combination group reduced SBP significantly (SMD: −33.35 [95% CI]: −40.27–−26.42, P < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between groups for the SBP (F [2,296] =3.38, P = 0.035). Verapamil alone showed a significant decrease in the SBP by −27.23 mmHg and diastolic BP by −4.980 mmHg.

Conclusion:

Intra-arterial administration of verapamil alone showed lower BP reduction compared to the combination of vasodilators. Verapamil could be a safer and effective alternative to prevent RAS with no deleterious effect on BP and HR in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography.

Update on complications and their management during transradial cardiac catheterization

Introduction: Transradial artery access (TRA) was introduced in 1989 and has been universally used as an alternative approach to the traditional transfemoral access (TFA). Complications of TRA include asymptomatic and less likely symptomatic radial artery occlusion, nonocclusive radial artery injury, radial artery spasm, radial arterial perforation, radial artery pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, granuloma formation, access-site bleeding, nerve damage, complex regional pain syndrome along with other rare complications.Areas covered: A literature search was performed using MedLine, PubMed, and Google Scholar (dating to 1 May 2019). Authors reviewed all articles related to transradial artery catheterization, its complications, as well as novel techniques for their management. The article provides insight on the incidence, risk factors, and prevention of such complications along with a description of usual and newer techniques to decrease morbidity.Expert opinion: With increasing experience, TRA complication rate is decreasing and new very uncommon complications are being described. A 'radial first' approach should be implemented in all catheterization laboratories and a physician's familiarity with minor and major complications is a must. Distal radial artery access through the snuff box might be the preferred site of accessing the radial artery and further studies will be needed to prove its superiority to the current access site.

Radial artery access site complications during cardiac procedures, clinical implications and potential solutions: The role of nitric oxide

Percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of coronary artery disease is most commonly performed in the UK through the radial artery, as this is safer than the femoral approach. However, despite improvements in technology and techniques, complications can occur. The most common complication, arterial spasm, can cause intense pain and, in some cases, procedural failure. The incidence of spasm is dependent on several variables, including operator experience, artery size, and equipment used. An anti-spasmolytic cocktail can be applied to reduce spasm, which usually includes an exogenous nitric oxide (NO) donor (glyceryl trinitrate). NO is an endogenous local vasodilator and therefore is a potential target for anti-spasm intervention. However, systemic administration can result in unwanted side-effects, such as hypotension. A method that adopts local delivery of NO might be advantageous. This review article describes the mechanisms involved in radial artery spasm, discusses the advantages and disadvantages of current strategies to reduce spasm, and highlight the potential of NO-loaded nanoporous materials for use in this setting.

Transarterial and transvenous access for neurointerventional surgery: report of the SNIS Standards and Guidelines Committee

The purpose of this publication is to provide a comprehensive review on the techniques and tools used for vascular access in neurointerventional procedures. Using published literature, we reviewed data on access methods, sites, tools, and techniques for neurointerventions. Recommendations are provided based on quality of data/levels of evidence and, where appropriate, expert consensus. While tools and techniques continue to be developed, current literature and experience supports certain principles regarding vascular access for neurointerventional procedures.

The effect of pre-procedural sublingual nifedipine on radial artery diameter

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the effect of nifedipine on radial artery (RA) relaxation before puncture for coronary intervention.

METHODS

In all, 120 patients were randomly assigned to nifedipine or control group. The diameter, resistance index (RI), and peak systolic velocity (PSV) of the RA were observed at 5, 15, and 30 min after nifedipine administration by a Doppler ultrasound examination.

RESULTS

The greatest effect on RA diameter, PSV and resistance index (RI) was observed 5 minutes after sublingual nifedipine administration. The RA parameter were associated with the baseline diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

Sublingual nifedipine administration before RA puncture has an obvious dilatation effect on small diameter RAs.

Accessing the Wrist: From Data to Tips and Tricks

Over the past 2 decades, radial artery access has increasingly become the standard approach for coronary angiography and intervention. Compared with femoral arteries, transradial access is associated with better hemostasis. Transradial access has increased patient preference, facilitates early ambulation, and is cost-effective. An important limitation of transradial access is access site failure, and it carries a crossover rate of 3% to 7% in randomized prospective trials comparing radial with femoral artery access among experienced operators. Crossover rates for failed primary radial artery access can be reduced with ultrasonography guidance and increased familiarity with alternative access sites in the wrist.

Transradial Artery Access Complications

Transradial access (TRA) is favored over transfemoral access for performing coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention due to the reduced risk for vascular and bleeding complications and the documented survival benefit in ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction patients who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention. TRA complications can be categorized as intra- or postprocedural and further categorized as related to bleeding or nonbleeding issues. Major intra- and postprocedural complications such as radial artery perforation and compartment syndrome are rare following TRA. Their occurrence, however, can be associated with morbid consequences, including requirement for surgical intervention if not identified and treated promptly. Nonbleeding complications such as radial artery spasm and radial artery occlusion are typically less morbid but occur much more frequently. Strategies to prevent TRA complications are essential and include the use of contemporary access techniques that limit arterial injury. This document summarizes contemporary techniques to prevent, identify, and manage TRA complications.