Bone turnover markers in women with early stage breast cancer who developed bone metastases. A prospective study with multivariate logistic regression analysis of accuracy

Prognostic value of serum tartrate‑resistant acid phosphatase‑5b for bone metastasis in patients with resectable breast cancer

Bone metastasis significantly affects the quality of life of patients with metastatic breast cancer, and can shorten overall survival. Identifying patients with early-stage breast cancer at high risk for bone metastasis and preventing bone metastasis may lead to a better quality of life and prolonged survival. The present study investigated whether serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b (TRACP-5b), a bone turnover marker, can be a prognostic factor for bone metastasis. Female patients who underwent resectable breast surgery between May 2002 and August 2006 were consecutively investigated. A total of 304 patients with a median follow-up of 3,722 days were retrospectively analyzed. TRACP-5b levels in sera prepared from patients' blood drawn preoperatively without any presurgical treatments were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The cutoff of TRACP-5b levels, in order to separate patients into high and low TRACP-5b groups, was set at median (347 mU/dl). The associations of clinicopathological factors, including TRACP-5b, with bone metastasis-free interval (BMFI), which was defined as the duration between surgery and the diagnosis of bone metastasis at any time point, were examined. Multivariate analysis of various clinicopathological features revealed that lymph node metastasis and histological grade were independent factors associated with BMFI (P=0.017 and 0.030, respectively). In patients with node-positive breast cancer (n=114), a high TRACP-5b level and a high grade were significantly and independently associated with worse BMFI (log-rank P=0.041 and 0.011, respectively). In conclusion, these findings indicated that TRACP-5b may predict bone metastasis in patients with node-positive breast cancer.

Retrospective Evaluation of Bone Turnover Markers in Serum for the Prediction of Metastases Development in Breast Cancer Patients: A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Serum bone turnover markers might play a role in the prediction of the development of bone metastases in breast cancer (BC) patients. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to address the association of serum bone turnover markers with oncologic outcomes.

METHODS

We included 80 women with BC, who were operated on at the Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Homburg/Saar, Germany. Serum samples were obtained prior to surgery and were used for estimation of the concentration of tumor and bone turnover markers using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and radioimmunoassay (RIA).

RESULTS

At baseline, pyridinoline cross-linked carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type-1 collagen (ICTP) concentrations were higher in nodal positive vs. negative tumors (Mann-Whitney test p = 0.04). After a median follow-up of 79.4 months, 17 patients developed metastases, with 9 demonstrating, among other organs, osseous metastases. ICTP demonstrated the best area under the curve in the predection of osseous metastases in our cohort (AUC = 0.740, DeLong Test p = 0.005). Univariable Cox proportional hazard models failed to demonstrate significant associations between serum bone turnover markers and oncologic outcomes (progression-free survival, overall survival).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum bone turnover markers (e.g., ICTP) were able to predict the development of osseous metastases but were not associated with oncologic outcomes. Further investigation and validation are required for the use of such markers in clinical practice.

Intersecting Paths: Unraveling the Complex Journey of Cancer to Bone Metastasis

The phenomenon of bone metastases presents a significant challenge within the context of advanced cancer treatments, particularly pertaining to breast, prostate, and lung cancers. These metastatic occurrences stem from the dissemination of cancerous cells into the bone, thereby interrupting the equilibrium between osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Such disruption results in skeletal complications, adversely affecting patient morbidity and quality of life. This review discusses the intricate interplay between cancer cells and the bone microenvironment, positing the bone not merely as a passive recipient of metastatic cells but as an active contributor to cancer progression through its distinctive biochemical and cellular makeup. A thorough examination of bone structure and the dynamics of bone remodeling is undertaken, elucidating how metastatic cancer cells exploit these processes. This review explores the genetic and molecular pathways that underpin the onset and development of bone metastases. Particular emphasis is placed on the roles of cytokines and growth factors in facilitating osteoclastogenesis and influencing osteoblast activity. Additionally, this paper offers a meticulous critique of current diagnostic methodologies, ranging from conventional radiography to advanced molecular imaging techniques, and discusses the implications of a nuanced understanding of bone metastasis biology for therapeutic intervention. This includes the development of targeted therapies and strategies for managing bone pain and other skeletal-related events. Moreover, this review underscores the imperative of ongoing research efforts aimed at identifying novel therapeutic targets and refining management approaches for bone metastases. It advocates for a multidisciplinary strategy that integrates advancements in medical oncology and radiology with insights derived from molecular biology and genetics, to enhance prognostic outcomes and the quality of life for patients afflicted by this debilitating condition. In summary, bone metastases constitute a complex issue that demands a comprehensive and informed approach to treatment. This article contributes to the ongoing discourse by consolidating existing knowledge and identifying avenues for future investigation, with the overarching objective of ameliorating patient care in the domain of oncology.

Bone Turnover Markers, n-Terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen and Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase Type 5b, for Predicting Castration Resistance in Prostate Cancer

Bone is a common site of prostate cancer metastasis. Bone turnover markers n-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (P1NP) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase type 5b (TRACP-5b) are highly sensitive to bone remodeling activity. However, their prognostic significance as markers of prostate cancer is unknown. This study retrospectively examined the usefulness of P1NP and TRACP-5b as prognostic biomarkers. Castration-resistant prostate cancer recurrence-free survival (CFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A predictive model for CFS was constructed using multivariate analysis. This study enrolled 255 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer at Kanazawa University Hospital. The median follow-up was 115.1 months. Patients with both high serum P1NP and TRACP-5b levels, defined as having a poor bone turnover category (BTC), had significantly shorter CFS. Multivariate analysis identified Gleason score, metastasis, and BTC poor as predictors for castration resistance in prostate cancer. Using these three factors, a prognostic model was established, categorizing patients into low-risk (no or one factor) and high-risk (two or three factors) groups. In the low-risk group, the median CFS was not reached, contrasting with 19.1 months in the high-risk group (hazard ratio, 32.23, p < 0.001). Combining P1NP and TRACP-5b may better predict castration resistance.

Diagnostic value of alkaline phosphatase and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase for metastases in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Numerous studies had reported the diagnostic value of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and its bone-specific isoforms (BAP) in the metastases of breast cancer (BC). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to summarize the diagnostic value of serum ALP and BAP in metastatic BC, especially focused on bone metastases.

METHODS

We searched comprehensively in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE for studies to explore the diagnostic accuracy of serum ALP/BAP level for metastatic BC. Qualities of including studies were assessed and pooled sensitivity, specificity, and summary receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated. Publication bias was assessed and meta-regression was conducted.

RESULTS

We finally included 25 studies with a total of 12,155 BC patients (1681 metastatic cases and 10,474 controls). According to the QUADAS-2 tool to assessment the methodological quality, most of the included studies were judged as high risk of patient selection bias. High serum levels of ALP/BAP in bone metastatic BC patients could be found compared with non-metastatic BC patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ALP for BC bone metastases were 0.62 and 0.86, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.80. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ALP for all site metastases (mainly bone and liver) were 0.56 and 0.91, and the AUC was 0.90. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of BAP for BC bone metastases were 0.66 and 0.92, and the AUC was 0.89.

CONCLUSION

Although not promising, serum ALP and BAP could bring useful information for the early detection of BC metastases especially for the bone metastases.

Advances in the study of biomarkers related to bone metastasis in breast cancer

Breast cancer is by far the most common malignancy in females. And bone is the most common site of distant metastasis in breast cancer, accounting for about 65 to 75% of all metastatic breast cancer patients.1,2Bone metastasis is an important factor affecting the prognosis of breast cancer. When patients have early-stage breast cancer without metastasis, their 5-year survival rate is as high as 90%, and once metastasis occurs, their 5-year survival rate will drop to 10%.3 Bone radionuclide imaging (ECT), X-ray, CT scan, MRI and other imaging tests to diagnose breast cancer bone metastasis are commonly used in clinical, It is currently believed that breast cancer bone metastasis is a multistep process: first, breast cancer cells need to acquire invasive and metastatic properties; breast cancer cells enter the blood circulation and migrate from blood breast cancer cells enter the blood circulation and migrate from blood vessels to bone tissue in a targeted manner; breast cancer cells adhere and remain in bone tissue and colonise it; and finally, it leads to bone destruction.4 Several key molecules are involved in breast cancer bone metastasis, and serum biomarkers are generally able to detect pathological changes earlier Several key molecules are involved in breast cancer bone metastasis, and serum biomarkers are generally able to detect pathological changes earlier than imaging.5 This review describes the progress of serum biomarkers for breast cancer bone metastasis.

Prognostic value of alkaline phosphatase and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Numerous studies have reported the clinical value of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and its bone-specific isoforms (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP)) in breast cancer. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to summarize the prognostic value of serum ALP and BAP in breast cancer, especially focused on bone metastasis and survival. PRISMA guidelines were followed to conduct this review. Observational studies were searched in PubMed, Cochcrane Library and EMBASE to January 1, 2022. Data were extracted to explore the prognostic value of ALP and BAP. The quality of the included studies was assessed and the outcome effects were evaluated. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed. There was a total of 53 studies with 22,436 patients included. For the primary outcome of survival, high levels of both ALP and BAP were associated with short survival time. The hazard ratio of high ALP level on overall survival was 1.72 (95% CI 1.37, 2.16, P < 0.001). For the secondary outcomes, a high ALP level (not BAP) was detected in breast cancer compared with healthy controls, and high levels of both ALP and BAP were risk factors for bone metastasis, while ALP (not BAP) was a risk factor for non-bone metastasis. This study showed that high levels of both serum ALP and BAP were associated with metastasis (BAP was associated with bone metastasis) and survival in breast cancer. The biomarkers could provide useful information for the early diagnostic assessment and monitoring in the follow-up of breast cancer patients.

Circulating biomarkers for diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring in bone metastasis

Bone is a frequent site of metastasis for multiple types of solid tumors in organs such as prostate, breast, lung, etc., accounting for significant morbidities and mortalities of afflicted patients. One of the major problems of bone metastasis is lack of biomarkers for early diagnosis and for monitoring therapeutic responses. Medical imaging modalities such as computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and radioactive isotope-based bone scans are currently standard clinical practices, yet these imaging techniques are limited to detect early lesions or to accurately monitor the metastatic disease progression during standard and/or experimental therapies. Accordingly, development of novel blood biomarkers rationalizes extensive basic research and clinical development. This review article covers the up-to-date information on protein- and cell-based biomarkers of bone metastasis that are currently used in the clinical practices and also are under development.

Bone Turnover Markers: Basic Biology to Clinical Applications

Bone turnover markers (BTMs) are used widely, in both research and clinical practice. In the last 20 years, much experience has been gained in measurement and interpretation of these markers, which include commonly used bone formation markers bone alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, and procollagen I N-propeptide; and commonly used resorption markers serum C-telopeptides of type I collagen, urinary N-telopeptides of type I collagen and tartrate resistant acid phosphatase type 5b. BTMs are usually measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or automated immunoassay. Sources contributing to BTM variability include uncontrollable components (e.g., age, gender, ethnicity) and controllable components, particularly relating to collection conditions (e.g., fasting/feeding state, and timing relative to circadian rhythms, menstrual cycling, and exercise). Pregnancy, season, drugs, and recent fracture(s) can also affect BTMs. BTMs correlate with other methods of assessing bone turnover, such as bone biopsies and radiotracer kinetics; and can usefully contribute to diagnosis and management of several diseases such as osteoporosis, osteomalacia, Paget's disease, fibrous dysplasia, hypophosphatasia, primary hyperparathyroidism, and chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder.

Role of Bone Turnover Markers in Osteoporosis Therapy

Bone turnover markers fill a clinical need that improves comprehensive care of metabolic bone health and osteoporosis. Creating a standard process for drawing them that reduces modifiable variability improves their precision and clinical usefulness. Creating a standard process for interpreting them by applying statistical significance improves their clinical applicability. Understanding what causes them to increase and decrease can help elucidate secondary causes of osteoporosis. Monitoring them can assess patient adherence to therapy for a silent disease that will progressively become louder with an aging global population.

Application of Biomarkers for the Prediction and Diagnosis of Bone Metastasis in Breast Cancer

The most common metastatic site of breast cancer is the bone. Metastatic bone disease can alter the integrity of the bone and cause serious complications, thereby greatly reducing health-related quality of life and leading to high medical costs. Although diagnostic methods and treatments for bone metastases (BM) are improving, some patients with early breast cancer who are at high risk of BM are not diagnosed early enough, leading to delayed intervention. Moreover, whole-body scintigraphy cannot easily distinguish BM from non-malignant bone diseases. To circumvent these issues, specific gene and protein biomarkers are being investigated for their potential to predict, diagnose, and evaluate breast cancer prognosis. In this review, we summarized the current biomarkers associated with BM in breast cancer and their role in clinical applications to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of BM in the future.

Application of "omics" sciences to the prediction of bone metastases from breast cancer: State of the art

•

Breast cancer (BC) is the first cause of cancer-related death in women.

•

Most patients with advanced BC develop bone metastases (BM).

•

Omics technologies have been applied to identify putative BM “predicting” biomarkers.

•

Prospective studies are needed before any clinical application of such biomarkers.

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent malignancy and the first cause of cancer-related death in women.

The majority of patients with advanced BC develop skeletal metastases which may ultimately lead to serious complications, termed skeletal-related events, that often dramatically impact on quality of life and survival.

Therefore, the identification of biomarkers able to stratify BC patient risk to develop bone metastases (BM) is fundamental to define personalized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, possibly at the earliest stages of the disease.

In this regard, the advent of “omics” sciences boosted the investigation of several putative biomarkers of BC osteotropism, including deregulated genes, proteins and microRNAs.

The present review revisits the current knowledge on BM development in BC and the most recent studies exploring potential BM-predicting biomarkers, based on the application of omics sciences to the study of primary breast malignancies.

Personal Medicine and Bone Metastases: Biomarkers, Micro-RNAs and Bone Metastases

Bone metastasis is a major cause of morbidity within solid tumours of the breast, prostate, lung and kidney. Metastasis to the skeleton is associated with a wide range of complications including bone fractures, spinal cord compression, hypercalcaemia and increased bone pain. Improved treatments for bone metastasis, such as the use of anti-bone resorptive bisphosphonate agents, within post-menopausal women have improved disease-free survival; however, these treatments are not without side effects. There is thus a need for biomarkers, which will predict the risk of developing the spread to bone within these cancers. The application of molecular profiling techniques, together with animal model systems and engineered cell-lines has enabled the identification of a series of potential bone-metastasis biomarker molecules predictive of bone metastasis risk. Some of these biomarker candidates have been validated within patient-derived samples providing a step towards clinical utility. Recent developments in multiplex biomarker quantification now enable the simultaneous measurement of up to 96 micro-RNA/protein molecules in a spatially defined manner with single-cell resolution, thus enabling the characterisation of the key molecules active at the sites of pre-metastatic niche formation as well as tumour-stroma signalling. These technologies have considerable potential to inform biomarker discovery. Additionally, a potential future extension of these discoveries could also be the identification of novel drug targets within cancer spread to bone. This chapter summarises recent findings in biomarker discovery within the key bone metastatic cancers (breast, prostate, lung and renal cell carcinoma). Tissue-based and circulating blood-based biomarkers are discussed from the fields of genomics, epigenetic regulation (micro-RNAs) and protein/cell-signalling together with a discussion of the potential future development of these markers towards clinical development.

Ankle loading ameliorates bone loss from breast cancer-associated bone metastasis

Breast cancer is a serious health problem that preferentially metastasizes to bone. We have previously shown that bone loss can be prevented by mechanical loading, but the efficacy of ankle loading for metastasis-linked bone loss has not been investigated. This study showed that body weight was decreased after inoculation of tumor cells, but ankle loading restored a rapid weight loss. The nonloading group exhibited a decrease in bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV), trabecular thickness, and trabecular number (all P < 0.01) as well as an increase in trabecular separation (P < 0.001). However, ankle loading improved those changes (all P < 0.05). Furthermore, although the nonloading group increased the tumor bearing as well as expression of IL-8 and matrix metalloproteinase 9, ankle loading decreased them. Induction of tumor in the bone elevated the osteoclast number (P < 0.05) as well as the levels of nuclear factor of activated T-cells cytoplasmic 1, NF-κB ligand, cathepsin K, and serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase type 5b, but ankle loading reduced osteoclast activity and those levels (all P < 0.05). Tumor bearing was positively correlated with the osteoclast number (P < 0.01) and negatively correlated with BV/TV and the osteoblast number (both P < 0.01). Collectively, these findings demonstrate that ankle loading suppresses tumor growth and osteolysis by inhibiting bone resorption and enhancing bone formation.-Yang, S., Liu, H., Zhu, L., Li, X., Liu, D., Song, X., Yokota, H., Zhang, P. Ankle loading ameliorates bone loss from breast cancer-associated bone metastasis.

Salivary Glycopatterns as Potential Biomarkers for Screening of Early-Stage Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

We systematically investigated and assessed the alterations of salivary glycopatterns and possibility as biomarkers for diagnosis of early-stage breast cancer.

DESIGN

Alterations of salivary glycopatterns were probed using lectin microarrays and blotting analysis from 337 patients with breast benign cyst or tumor (BB) or breast cancer (I/II stage) and 110 healthy humans. Their diagnostic models were constructed by a logistic stepwise regression in the retrospective cohort. Then, the performance of the diagnostic models were assessed by ROC analysis in the validation cohort. Finally, a double-blind cohort was tested to confirm the application potential of the diagnostic models.

RESULTS

The diagnostic models were constructed based on 9 candidate lectins (e.g., PHA-E+L, BS-I, and NPA) that exhibited significant alterations of salivary glycopatterns, which achieved better diagnostic powers with an AUC value >0.750 (p<0.001) for the diagnosis of BB (AUC: 0.752, sensitivity: 0.600, and specificity: 0.835) and I stage breast cancer (AUC: 0.755, sensitivity: 0.733, and specificity: 0.742) in the validation cohort. The diagnostic model of I stage breast cancer exhibited a high accuracy of 0.902 in double-blind cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

This study could contribute to the screening for patients with early-stage breast cancer based on precise alterations of salivary glycopatterns.

Effects on bone resorption markers of continuing pamidronate or switching to zoledronic acid in patients with high risk bone metastases from breast cancer

Background

Switching patients who remain at high risk of skeletal related events (SREs) despite pamidronate to the more potent bisphosphonate zoledronate, may be an effective treatment strategy. As part of a previously reported clinic study in this setting, we evaluated whether biomarkers for bone resorption, such as Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP), bone sialoprotein (BSP), and N-terminal telopeptide (NTX) correlated with subsequent SRE risk.

Methods

Breast cancer patients who remained at high risk of SREs despite at least 3 months of q.3–4 weekly pamidronate were randomized to either continue on pamidronate or to switch to zoledronate (4 mg) once every 4 weeks for 12-weeks. High risk bone metastases were defined by either: occurrence of a prior SRE, bone pain, radiologic progression of bone metastases and/or serum C-terminal telopeptide (CTx) levels > 400 ng/L despite pamidronate use. Serum samples were collected at baseline and weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12 (CTx and BSAP) and baseline and week 12 (NTx and BSP), and all putative biomarkers were measured by ELISA. Follow up was extended to 2 years post trial entry for risk of subsequent SREs. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time-to-event outcomes. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to evaluate if laboratory values over time or the change in laboratory values from baseline were associated with having a SRE within the time frame of this study.

Results

From March 2012 to May 2014, 76 patients were screened, with 73 eligible for enrolment. All 73 patients were available for biochemical analysis, with 35 patients receiving pamidronate and 38 patients receiving zoledronate. The GEE analysis found that no laboratory value was associated with having a subsequent SRE. Interaction between visit and laboratory values was also investigated, but no interaction effect was statistically significant. Only increased number of lines of prior hormonal treatment was associated with subsequent SRE risk.

Conclusion

Our analysis failed to find any association between serum BSAP, BSP, CTx or NTx levels and subsequent SRE risk in this cohort of patients. This lack of correlation between serum biomarkers and clinical outcomes could be due to influences of prior bisphosphonate treatment or presence of extra-osseous metastases in a significant proportion of enrolled patients. As such, caution should be used in biomarker interpretation and use to direct decision making regarding SRE risk for high risk patients in this setting.

Early identification and intervention matters: A comprehensive review of current evidence and recommendations for the monitoring of bone health in patients with cancer

Bone metastases are common in patients with advanced solid tumors, and many individuals experience debilitating skeletal-related events (SREs; e.g. pathologic fracture, hypercalcemia, radiotherapy or surgery to bone, and spinal cord compression). These events substantially affect disease outcomes, including survival and quality of life, and healthcare systems. Plain radiography is the most widely used imaging modality for the detection of bone metastases; skeletal scintigraphy, computed tomography, positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging offer greater sensitivity but their use in routine practice is restricted by high costs and limited availability. Biomarkers of bone turnover may also have a role in the early detection of bone metastases and can provide valuable prognostic information on disease progression. SREs can be delayed or prevented using agents such as the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) inhibitor, denosumab, and bisphosphonates. Painful bone metastases can be treated with radiofrequency ablation, radiotherapy, or radionuclides such as radium-223 dichloride, which has been shown to delay the onset of SREs in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Close monitoring of bone health in patients with advanced cancer may lead to early identification of individuals with bone metastases who could benefit from early intervention to prevent SREs. This review examines current guideline recommendations for assessing and monitoring bone health in patients with advanced cancer, use of biomarkers and treatment of patients with bone metastases. The emerging evidence for the potential survival benefit conferred by early intervention with denosumab and bisphosphonates is also discussed, together with best practice recommendations.

The role of biomarkers in the management of bone-homing malignancies

Bone represents a common site of metastasis from several solid tumours, including breast, prostate and lung malignancies. The onset of bone metastases (BM) is associated not only with serious skeletal complications, but also shortened overall survival, owing to the lack of curative treatment options for late-stage cancer.

Despite the diagnostic advances, BM detection often occurs in the symptomatic stage, underlining the need for novel strategies aimed at the early identification of high-risk patients. To this purpose, both bone turnover and tumour-derived markers are being investigated for their potential diagnostic, prognostic and predictive roles.

In this review, we summarize the pathogenesis of BM in breast, prostate and lung tumours, while exploring the current research focused on the identification and clinical validation of BM biomarkers.