MAPPED study design: a 6 month randomised controlled study to evaluate the effect of dutasteride on prostate cancer volume using magnetic resonance imaging

Effect of 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitors on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate Cancer Detection

Concerns exist regarding the effects of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) on multipa-rametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection. Our objective is to analyze the effect of 5-ARI on the prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS) distribution and csPCa and insignificant PCa (iPCa) detection. Among 2212 men with serum prostate-specific antigen levels of >3.0 ng/mL and/or suspicious digital rectal examinations who underwent mpMRI and targeted and/or systematic biopsies, 120 individuals exposed to 5-ARI treatment for over a year were identified. CsPCa was defined when the grade group (GG) was >2. The overall csPCa and iPCa detection rates were 44.6% and 18.8%, respectively. Since logistic regression revealed independent predictors of PCa, a randomized matched group of 236 individuals was selected for analysis. The PI-RADS distribution was comparable with 5-ARI exposure (p 0.685). The CsPCa detection rates in 5-ARI-naïve men and 5-ARI-exposed men were 52.6% and 47.4%, respectively (p 0.596). IPCa was detected in 37.6 and 62.5%, respectively (p 0.089). The tumor GG distribution based on 5-ARI exposure was similar (p 0.149) to the rates of csPCa and iPCa across the PI-RADS categories. We conclude that exposure to 5-ARI in suspected PCa men did not change the PI-RADS distribution and the csPCa and iPCa detection rates.

Diagnosis of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance imaging in men treated with 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors

PURPOSE

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate if exposure to 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) modifies the effect of MRI for the diagnosis of clinically significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa) (ISUP Gleason grade ≥ 2).

METHODS

This study is a multicenter cohort study including patients undergoing prostate biopsy and MRI at 24 institutions between 2013 and 2022. Multivariable analysis predicting csPCa with an interaction term between 5-ARIs and PIRADS score was performed. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative (NPV) and positive (PPV) predictive values of MRI were compared in treated and untreated patients.

RESULTS

705 patients (9%) were treated with 5-ARIs [median age 69 years, Interquartile range (IQR): 65, 73; median PSA 6.3 ng/ml, IQR 4.0, 9.0; median prostate volume 53 ml, IQR 40, 72] and 6913 were 5-ARIs naïve (age 66 years, IQR 60, 71; PSA 6.5 ng/ml, IQR 4.8, 9.0; prostate volume 50 ml, IQR 37, 65). MRI showed PIRADS 1-2, 3, 4, and 5 lesions in 141 (20%), 158 (22%), 258 (37%), and 148 (21%) patients treated with 5-ARIs, and 878 (13%), 1764 (25%), 2948 (43%), and 1323 (19%) of untreated patients (p < 0.0001). No difference was found in csPCa detection rates, but diagnosis of high-grade PCa (ISUP GG ≥ 3) was higher in treated patients (23% vs 19%, p = 0.013). We did not find any evidence of interaction between PIRADS score and 5-ARIs exposure in predicting csPCa. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of PIRADS ≥ 3 were 94%, 29%, 46%, and 88% in treated patients and 96%, 18%, 43%, and 88% in untreated patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to 5-ARIs does not affect the association of PIRADS score with csPCa. Higher rates of high-grade PCa were detected in treated patients, but most were clearly visible on MRI as PIRADS 4 and 5 lesions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The present study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT05078359.

PI-RADS score v.2 in predicting malignancy in patients undergoing 5α-reductase inhibitor therapy

BACKGROUND

To investigate if the PI-RADS score represents an effective tool in detecting prostate cancer in patients treated with a 5α-reductase inhibitor (dutasteride) and to identify dedicated total serum PSA and PSA density thresholds.

METHODS

Between April 2015 and March 2018, 75 patients under dutasteride treatment underwent multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scans and US/MRI fusion prostate biopsy. Lesions were classified into two groups: Group 1 included PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions, whilst Group 2 included PI-RADS 3-4-5 lesions. Lesions in groups 1 and 2 were further divided according to the patients' history of previous prostate biopsy.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven lesions were detected. In PI-RADS 4-5 group, mpMRI showed a sensitivity of 78.0% and a specificity of 78.7%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 79.6% and the negative predictive value (NPV) 77.1%. In PI-RADS 3-4-5 group, sensitivity was 100%, specificity 21.3%, PPV 57.5%, NPV 100%. In PI-RADS 4-5 biopsy-naive group sensitivity was 71.4%, specificity 75.0%. PPV 78.9% and NPV 66.7%. In PI-RADS 4-5 non-biopsy-naive group sensitivity was 82.8%, specificity 80.6%, PPV 80%, and NPV 83.3%. PI-RADS 3-4-5 biopsy-naive group showed sensitivity 100%, specificity 31.3%, PPV 65.6%, NPV 100%. PI-RADS 3-4-5 non-biopsy-naive group showed sensitivity 100%, specificity 16.1%, PPV 52.7%, and NPV 100%. ROC curve analysis indicated a serum total PSA threshold of 6 ng/ml (AUC: 0.71-95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.81) and a PSA density >0.22 (AUC: 0.70-95% confidence interval: 0.6-0.81) as optimal cut-offs for recommending prostate biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience the PI-RADS score proved to be sufficiently accurate in predicting prostate cancer in patients under dutasteride therapy.

Sequential prostate MRI reporting in men on active surveillance: initial experience of a dedicated PRECISE software program

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is interest in using sequential multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to assess men on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer. The Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) recommendations propose standardised reporting mpMRI data for these men. This includes accurate size measurements of lesions over time, but such approach is time consuming for the radiologist and there is a strong need of dedicated tools to report serial scans in a systematic manner. We present the results from an initial validation cohort using dedicated PRECISE reporting software to allow automated comparison between sequential scans on AS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed baseline and follow-up scans of 20 men randomised to 6 months of daily dutasteride (n = 10) or placebo (n = 10) from the MAPPED trial. Men underwent 3T mpMRI at baseline and after 6 months, and a dedicated radiologist reported the scans using both a widespread commercially-available platform (Osirix®) and a semi-automated dedicated PRECISE reporting tool (MIM®). Tumour volume by planimetry in all sequences and conspicuity on diffusion-weighted imaging were assessed. Reporting time was recorded, and we used the Wilcoxon test for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Median tumour volumes and conspicuity were similar using both approaches. The reporting time of the follow-up scan was quicker using the PRECISE reporting workflow both in the whole population (12'33″ vs 10'52″; p = 0.005) and in the dutasteride arm (15'50″ vs 12'59″; p = 0.01). A structured report including clinical and imaging data was generated according to the PRECISE recommendations and a comparison table between lesion characteristics at baseline and follow-up scans was also included.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that a dedicated PRECISE reporting tool for sequential scans in men on AS results in a significant reduction in the reporting time and allows the radiologist to easily compare scans over time. This tool will help with our understanding of the natural history of mpMRI changes during AS.

VERDICT-AMICO: Ultrafast fitting algorithm for non-invasive prostate microstructure characterization

VERDICT (vascular, extracellular and restricted diffusion for cytometry in tumours) estimates and maps microstructural features of cancerous tissue non-invasively using diffusion MRI. The main purpose of this study is to address the high computational time of microstructural model fitting for prostate diagnosis, while retaining utility in terms of tumour conspicuity and repeatability. In this work, we adapt the accelerated microstructure imaging via convex optimization (AMICO) framework to linearize the estimation of VERDICT parameters for the prostate gland. We compare the original non-linear fitting of VERDICT with the linear fitting, quantifying accuracy with synthetic data, and computational time and reliability (performance and precision) in eight patients. We also assess the repeatability (scan-rescan) of the parameters. Comparison of the original VERDICT fitting versus VERDICT-AMICO showed that the linearized fitting (1) is more accurate in simulation for a signal-to-noise ratio of 20 dB; (2) reduces the processing time by three orders of magnitude, from 6.55 seconds/voxel to 1.78 milliseconds/voxel; (3) estimates parameters more precisely; (4) produces similar parametric maps and (5) produces similar estimated parameters with a high Pearson correlation between implementations, r2  > 0.7. The VERDICT-AMICO estimates also show high levels of repeatability. Finally, we demonstrate that VERDICT-AMICO can estimate an extra diffusivity parameter without losing tumour conspicuity and retains the fitting advantages. VERDICT-AMICO provides microstructural maps for prostate cancer characterization in seconds.

Prostate cancer detection using quantitative T2 and T2 -weighted imaging: The effects of 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors in men on active surveillance

BACKGROUND

T₂ -weighted imaging (T₂ -WI) information has been used in a qualitative manner in the assessment of prostate cancer. Quantitative derivatives (T₂ relaxation time) can be generated from T₂ -WI. These outputs may be useful in helping to discriminate clinically significant prostate cancer from background signal.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

To investigate changes in quantitative T₂ parameters in lesions and noncancerous tissue of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer taking dutasteride 0.5 mg or placebo daily for 6 months.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION/SUBJECTS

Forty men randomized to 6 months of daily dutasteride (n = 20) or placebo (n = 20).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Multiparametric 3T MRI at baseline and 6 months. This included a multiecho MR sequence for quantification of the T₂ relaxation times, in three regions of interest (index lesion, noncancerous peripheral [PZ] and transitional [TZ] zones). A synthetic signal contrast (T₂ Q contrast) between lesion and noncancerous tissue was assessed using quantitative T₂ values. Signal contrast was calculated using the T₂ -weighted sequence (T₂ W contrast).

ASSESSMENT

Two radiologists reviewed the scans in consensus according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS v. 2) guidelines.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U-tests, Spearman's correlation.

RESULTS

When compared to noncancerous tissue, shorter T₂ values were observed within lesions at baseline (83.5 and 80.5 msec) and 6 months (81.5 and 81.9 msec) in the placebo and dutasteride arm, respectively. No significant differences for T₂ W contrast at baseline and after 6 months were observed, both in the placebo (0.40 [0.29-0.49] vs. 0.43 [0.25-0.49]; P = 0.881) and dutasteride arm (0.35 [0.24-0.47] vs. 0.37 [0.22-0.44]; P = 0.668). There was a significant, positive correlation between the T₂ Q contrast and the T₂ W contrast values (r = 0.786; P < 0.001).

DATA CONCLUSION

The exposure to antiandrogen therapy did not significantly influence the T₂ contrast or the T₂ relaxation values in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1646-1653.

MRI findings in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: does dutasteride make MRI visible lesions less conspicuous? Results from a placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

To investigate changes in the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer taking dutasteride 0.5 mg or placebo.

METHODS

We analysed 37 men, randomised to 6 months of daily dutasteride (n = 18) or placebo (n = 19), undergoing 3T multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) scans at baseline and 6 months. Images were reviewed blind to treatment allocation and clinical information. Mean ADC of peripheral (PZ) and transition (TZ) zones, and MR-suspicious lesions were compared between groups over 6 months. Conspicuity was defined as the PZ divided by tumour ADC, and its change over 6 months was assessed.

RESULTS

A decrease in mean conspicuity in the dutasteride group (but not the controls) was seen over 6 months (1.54 vs 1.38; p = 0.025). Absolute changes in ADC and conspicuity were significantly different between placebo and dutasteride groups at 6 months: (-0.03 vs 0.08, p = 0.033) and (0.11 vs -0.16, p = 0.012), as were percentage changes in the same parameters: (-2.27% vs 8.56% p = 0.048) and (9.25% vs -9.89% p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Dutasteride was associated with increased tumour ADC and reduced conspicuity. A lower threshold for triggering biopsy might be considered in men on dutasteride undergoing mpMRI for prostate cancer.

KEY POINTS

• Dutasteride increases ADC and reduces conspicuity in small mpMRI-visible prostate cancers. • Knowledge of dutasteride exposure is important in the interpretation of prostate mpMRI. • A lower threshold for triggering biopsy may be appropriate on dutasteride.

Improved multiparametric MRI discrimination between low-risk prostate cancer and benign tissues in a small cohort of 5α-reductase inhibitor treated individuals as compared with an untreated cohort

The purpose of this study was to determine whether 5α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) affect the discrimination between low-grade prostate cancer and benign tissues on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). Twenty men with biopsy-proven Gleason 3 + 3 prostate cancer and 3 T mpMRI were studied. Ten patients (Tx) had been receiving 5-ARIs for at least a year at scan time. Ten untreated patients (Un) were matched to the treated cohort. For each subject two regions of interest representing cancerous and benign tissues were drawn within the peripheral zone of each prostate, MR measures evaluated, and cancer contrast versus benign (contrast = (MR_Tumor  - MR_Healthy )/MR_Healthy ) calculated. Decreased cancer contrast was noted on T₂ -weighted images: 0.4 (Un) versus 0.3 (Tx). However, for functional MR measures, a better separation of cancerous and benign tissues was observed in the treated group. Cancer contrast on high-b diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was 0.61 (Un) versus 0.99 (Tx). Logistic regression analysis yielded higher AUC (area under the curve) values for distinguishing cancerous from benign regions in treated subjects on high-b DWI (0.71 (Un), 0.94 (Tx)), maximal enhancement slope (0.95 (Un), 1 (Tx)), peak enhancement (0.84 (Un), 0.93 (Tx)), washout slope (0.78 (Un), 0.99 (Tx)), K^trans (0.9 (Un), 1 (Tx)), and combined measures (0.86 (Un), 0.99 (Tx)). Coefficients of variation for MR measures were lower in benign and cancerous tissues in the treated group compared with the untreated group. This study's results suggest an increase in homogeneity of benign and malignant peripheral zone prostatic tissues with 5-ARI exposure, observed as reduced variability of MR measures after treatment. Cancer discrimination was lower with T₂ -weighted imaging, but was higher with functional MR measures in a 5-ARI-treated cohort compared with controls.

The Effect of Dutasteride on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Defined Prostate Cancer: MAPPED-A Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

Dutasteride, which is licensed for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia, has been associated with a lower progression rate of low risk prostate cancer. We evaluated the effect of dutasteride on prostate cancer volume as assessed by T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial, men with biopsy proven, low-intermediate risk prostate cancer (up to Gleason 3 + 4 and PSA up to 15 ng/ml) who had visible lesion of 0.2 ml or greater on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences were randomized to daily dutasteride 0.5 mg or placebo for 6 months. Lesion volume was assessed at baseline, and 3 and 6 months with image guided biopsy to the lesion at study exit. The primary end point was the percent reduction in lesion volume over 6 months. This trial was registered with the European Clinical Trials register (EudraCT 2009-102405-18).

RESULTS

A total of 42 men were recruited between June 2010 and January 2012. In the dutasteride group, the average volumes at baseline and 6 months were 0.55 and 0.38 ml, respectively and the average reduction was 36%. In the placebo group, the average volumes at baseline and 6 months were 0.65 and 0.76 ml, respectively, and the average reduction was -12%. The difference in percent reductions between the groups was 48% (95% CI 27.4-68.3, p <0.0001). The most common adverse event was deterioration in erectile function, which was 25% in men randomized to dutasteride and 16% in men randomized to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Dutasteride was associated with a significant reduction in prostate cancer volume on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging compared to placebo.

Will the attributes of multiparametric MRI permit the creation of a new approach to therapy?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To explore the concept that MRI can be used to permit a new approach to therapy of localized prostate cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

With the development of multiparametric MRI, we can characterize cancer within the prostate, in terms of location, volume and radiological phenotype. The use of volume and location to identify candidates for focal ablative therapy is well established.The radiological phenotype of a tumour includes the vascularity and diffusion characteristics of that tumour. These characteristics may help us to develop novel interventions to target particular characteristics of a tumour.The assessment of novel interventions such as sulforaphanes found in broccoli, and common medications used for other diseases such as aspirin and metformin typically use population based studies, or repeat biopsy studies in large groups of men on active surveillance. MRI, with its accurate detection of change in visible tumour over a 6-month period, could allow rapid noninvasive assessment of a novel intervention.

SUMMARY

MRI could be used to allow the rapid and efficient assessment of dietary and other interventions to identify candidates for assessment in larger studies and potentially, to identify subgroups of tumours which would be most suited to a given intervention.

Multiparametric MRI and targeted prostate biopsy: Improvements in cancer detection, localization, and risk assessment

Introduction

Multiparametric-MRI (mp-MRI) is an evolving noninvasive imaging modality that increases the accurate localization of prostate cancer at the time of MRI targeted biopsy, thereby enhancing clinical risk assessment, and improving the ability to appropriately counsel patients regarding therapy.

Material and methods

We used MEDLINE/PubMed to conduct a comprehensive search of the English medical literature. Articles were reviewed, data was extracted, analyzed, and summarized. In this review, we discuss the mp-MRI prostate exam, its role in targeted prostate biopsy, along with clinical applications and outcomes of MRI targeted biopsies.

Results

Mp-MRI, consisting of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, and possibly MR spectroscopy, has demonstrated improved specificity in prostate cancer detection as compared to conventional T2-weighted images alone. An MRI suspicion score has been developed and is depicted using an institutional Likert or, more recently, a standardized reporting scale (PI-RADS). Techniques of MRI-targeted biopsy include in-gantry MRI guided biopsy, TRUS-guided visual estimation biopsy, and software co-registered MRI-US guided biopsy (MRI-US fusion). Among men with no previous biopsy, MRI-US fusion biopsy demonstrates up to a 20% increase in detection of clinically significant cancers compared to systematic biopsy while avoiding a significant portion of low risk disease. These data suggest a potential role in reducing over-detection and, ultimately, over-treatment. Among men with previous negative biopsy, 72–87% of cancers detected by MRI targeted biopsy are clinically significant. Among men with known low risk cancer, repeat biopsy by MR-targeting improves risk stratification in selecting men appropriate for active surveillance secondarily reducing the need for repetitive biopsy during surveillance.

Conclusions

Use of mp-MRI for targeting prostate biopsies has the potential to reduce the sampling error associated with conventional biopsy by providing better disease localization and sampling. MRI-ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy may improve the identification of clinically significant prostate cancer while limiting detection of indolent disease, ultimately facilitating more accurate risk stratification. Literature supports the clinical applications of MRI-targeted biopsy in men who have never been biopsied before, those with a prior negative biopsy, and those with low risk disease considering active surveillance.

Can MRI replace serial biopsies in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of MRI in active surveillance to date has been in assessing men with low or intermediate-risk disease to identify those men harbouring higher risk disease undersampled at standard biopsy. MRI as a tool for reassessing men over the surveillance period, as an alternative to repeat standard biopsies, is also of interest.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple studies suggest that MRI early in active surveillance can identify men whose prostate cancer was undersampled at initial biopsy, and MRI-targeted biopsies can be offered. There are a small number of centres now using MRI in the routine follow-up of men on active surveillance. The presence of a lesion on MRI indicates that a man is at higher likelihood of radiological progression than men with a negative MRI at diagnosis. These findings need to be validated in longer-term studies with predefined criteria for radiological significance and radiological progression.

SUMMARY

MRI is useful in the identification of men with higher-risk prostate cancer prior to commencement of a formal active surveillance programme. It is also of use in following up men on active surveillance, as a way to detect change in tumour over time.

Magnetic resonance imaging in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review

CONTEXT

There is great interest in using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for men on active surveillance for prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review evidence regarding the use of MRI in men with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer suitable for active surveillance.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Ovid Medline and Embase databases were searched for active surveillance, prostate cancer, and MRI from inception until April 25, 2014 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses process. Identified reports were critically appraised according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) criteria.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A lesion on MRI suspicious for prostate cancer (positive MRI) is seen in two-thirds of men otherwise suitable for active surveillance. A positive MRI makes the identification of clinically significant disease at repeat biopsy more likely, especially when biopsies are targeted to suspicious MRI lesions. Radical prostatectomy data show that positive MRI is more likely to be associated with upgrading (Gleason score>3+3) than a negative MRI (43% vs 27%). A positive MRI is not significantly more likely to be associated with upstaging at radical prostatectomy (>T2) than a negative MRI (10% vs 8%). Although MRI is of interest in the monitoring of men on active surveillance, robust data on the use of repeat MRI in active surveillance are lacking. Prospective studies with clear definitions of radiological significance and progression are needed before this approach can be adopted.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI is useful for detection of clinically significant disease at initial assessment of men considering active surveillance. To use MRI as a monitoring tool in surveillance, it will be necessary to define both radiological significance and radiological progression.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This review assesses evidence for the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. MRI at the start of surveillance can detect clinically significant disease in one-third to half of men. There are few data to assess the use of MRI as a monitoring tool during surveillance, so there is a need to define significant disease on MRI and significant changes over time.

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the management and diagnosis of prostate cancer: current applications and strategies

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become increasingly used worldwide in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. With advances in multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) technology, such as the use of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging sequences, observational studies have evaluated the utility for mpMRI in the continuum of prostate cancer management, from improving the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, to planning radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy and the early detection of local recurrence. Furthermore, the potential for advanced imaging to reduce the burden of routine serial prostate needle biopsies for men on active surveillance is a promising area of research. MRI technology continues to evolve, and the potential applications in the management of prostate cancer care will require well-designed multi-institutional prospective clinical trials and rigorous efforts to standardize reporting and improve dissemination of expertise across institutions.

The role of MRI in active surveillance of prostate cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of active surveillance is to avoid radical treatment and its side-effects in men who have truly low risk prostate cancer, whilst offering radical treatment to those men who are at higher risk of local progression or metastatic disease. The traditional tools used to attribute these risk categories are prostate specific antigen, digital rectal examination, transrectal biopsy and their repeated application over time. MRI is emerging as a tool which may be able to more accurately determine the risk of significant disease at diagnosis and progression of disease over time. This review will examine the role of MRI in men on active surveillance.

RECENT FINDINGS

The body of work on MRI as a tool for the detection of significant cancer is rapidly increasing, both in men undergoing initial assessment for prostate cancer risk, and in those who have low risk cancer on standard transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy. In addition, the use of MRI as a tool to detect change in prostate cancer is being explored by a small number of groups.

SUMMARY

Multiparametric MRI is a useful tool in the initial assessment and surveillance of men who choose to avoid radical treatment when first diagnosed with localized prostate cancer.