The Trial Using Motivational Interviewing and Positive Affect and Self-Affirmation in African-Americans with Hypertension (TRIUMPH): from theory to clinical trial implementation

Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Graft Outcome Disparities in African American Kidney Transplants (MITIGAAT Study): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The outcome disparities for African American recipients of kidney transplant is a public health issue that has plagued the field of transplant since its inception. Based on national data, African American recipients have nearly twice the risk of graft loss at 5 years after transplant, when compared with White recipients. Evidence demonstrates that medication nonadherence and high tacrolimus variability substantially impact graft outcomes and racial disparities, most notably late (>2 years) after the transplant. Nonadherence is a leading cause of graft loss. Prospective multicenter data demonstrate that one-third of all graft loss are directly attributed to nonadherence. We have spent 10 years of focused research to develop a comprehensive model explaining the predominant risk factors leading to disparities in African American kidney recipients. However, there are still gaps in patient-level data that hinder the deeper understanding of the disparities. Lack of data from the patient often lead to provider biases, which will be addressed with this intervention. Culturally competent, pharmacist-led interventions in medication therapy management will also address therapeutic inertia. Pharmacist interventions will mitigate medication access barriers as well (cost and insurance denials). Thus, this multidimensional intervention addresses patient, provider, and structural factors that drive racial disparities in African American kidney recipients.

OBJECTIVE

This prospective, randomized controlled trial aimed to determine the impact of multimodal health services intervention on health outcomes disparities in African American recipients of kidney transplant. The aims of this study are to improve adherence and control of late clinical issues, which are predominant factors for racial disparities in kidney recipients, through a technology-enabled, telehealth-delivered, 4-level intervention.

METHODS

The Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Graft Outcome Disparities in African American Kidney Transplants (MITIGAAT) study is a 24-month, 2-arm, single-center (Medical University of South Carolina), 1:1 randomized controlled trial involving 190 participants (95 in each arm), measuring the impact on adherence and control of late clinical issues for racial disparities in kidney recipients, through a technology-enabled, telehealth-delivered, 4-level intervention. The key clinical issues for this study include tacrolimus variability, blood pressure, and glucose control (in those with diabetes mellitus). We will also assess the impact of the intervention on health care use (hospitalizations and emergency department visits) and conduct a cost-benefit analysis. Finally, we will assess the impact of the intervention on acute rejection and graft survival rates as compared with a large contemporary national cohort.

RESULTS

This study was funded in July 2023. Enrolled began in April 2024 and is expected to be complete in 2026. All patients will complete the study by the end of 2028.

CONCLUSIONS

In this protocol, we describe the study design, methods, aims, and outcome measures that will be used in the ongoing MITIGAAT clinical trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06023615; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06023615.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/57784.

"A cuff is not enough": A community-based participatory research approach to soliciting perspectives of African Americans with hypertension and their family members on self-management intervention features

We aimed to solicit the perspectives of African Americans with hypertension and their family members on the desired features of a behavioral hypertension self-management intervention. Using a community-based participatory approach to intervention design, we conducted four dyadic focus groups, including African American community members with hypertension (n = 23) and their family members (n = 23), recruited from African American-serving Christian churches in a large, southern metropolitan area. We used open-ended questions to elicit participants' perspectives regarding program features they would recommend, intervention delivery, and barriers necessary to address. Our grounded theory analysis identified themes reflecting participants' recommendations for hypertension self-management interventions to enhance health literacy and provide communication training via an accessible, population-tailored, family-based approach, which they believed has the potential to create family-level impact on health across generations. Participants also recommended intervention researchers engage in advocacy (i.e., via physician education and policy change) as part of a broader impact on structural inequities driving worse hypertension and health outcomes for African Americans. The perceptions and recommendations of African Americans with a lived experience of hypertension, as well as their family members, aid in shaping acceptable and efficacious behavioral interventions aiming to promote hypertension self-management behavior while leveraging the unique power of family relationships to create sustained behavior change.

Community Health workers United to Reduce Colorectal cancer and cardiovascular disease among people at Higher risk (CHURCH): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most lethal cancer in the United States (U.S.) with the highest incidence and mortality rates among African Americans (AAs) compared to other racial groups. Despite these disparities, AAs are the least likely to undergo CRC screening, have precancerous colorectal polyps removed, and have CRC detected at stages early enough for curative excision. In addition, compelling evidence links inflammatory dietary patterns to increased CRC and cardiovascular disease risk. Studies show that AA churches can successfully engage in health promotion activities including those related to cancer control. The current study seeks to leverage church-placed Community Health Workers (CHWs) to increase CRC screening and reduce CRC risk.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We aim to (1) increase guideline concordant CRC screening uptake using church-placed CHWs trained in screening with a validated instrument, Brief Intervention using Motivational Interviewing, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT); and (2) reduce dietary risk factors (inflammatory dietary patterns) linked to CRC. The latter will be addressed by culturally adapting an existing, web-based lifestyle program called Alive!. Using a Hybrid Type 1 Implementation-Effectiveness cluster randomized design, we will randomize 22 AA churches into either the dual intervention arm (CHW-led SBIRT intervention plus Alive!) or a usual care arm comprised of CRC prevention educational pamphlets and a list of CRC screening sites. We will recruit 440 subjects and evaluate the effects of both arms on screening uptake (colonoscopy, fecal DNA) (primary outcome) and dietary inflammation score (secondary outcome) at 6-month follow-up, and Life Simple7 (LS7)-a cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk score-at 6 months and 1 year (secondary outcome). Finally, guided by a racism-conscious adaptation of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we will conduct a mixed-methods process evaluation with key stakeholders to understand multi-level influences on CRC screening and CVD risk behaviors.

DISCUSSION

Church-placed CHWs are trusted influential connectors between communities and health systems. Studies have shown that these CHWs can successfully implement health prevention protocols in churches, including those related to cancer control, making them potentially important community mediators of CRC screening uptake and CRC/CVD risk reduction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05174286; clinicaltrials.gov; August 31st, 2023.

Community Health workers United to Reduce Colorectal cancer and cardiovascular disease among people at Higher risk (CHURCH): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most lethal cancer in the United States (U.S.) with the highest incidence and mortality rates among African Americans (AAs) compared to other racial groups. Despite these disparities, AAs are the least likely to undergo CRC screening, have precancerous colorectal polys removed, and have CRC detected at stages early enough for curative excision. In addition, compelling evidence links inflammatory dietary patterns to increased CRC and cardiovascular disease risk. Studies show that AA churches can successfully engage in health promotion activities including those related to cancer control. The current study seeks to leverage church-placed Community Health Workers (CHWs) to increase CRC screening and reduce CRC risk.

Design and Methods

We aim to (1) increase guideline concordant CRC screening uptake using church-placed CHWs trained in screening with a validated instrument, Brief Intervention using Motivational Interviewing, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT); and (2) reduce dietary risk factors (inflammatory dietary patterns) linked to CRC. The latter will be addressed by culturally adapting an existing, web-based lifestyle program called Alive!. Using a Hybrid Type 1 Implementation-Effectiveness cluster randomized design, we will randomize 22 AA churches into either the dual intervention arm (CHW-led SBIRT intervention plus Alive!) or a usual care arm comprised of CRC prevention educational pamphlets and a list of CRC screening sites. We will recruit 440 subjects and evaluate the effects of both arms on screening uptake (colonoscopy, fecal DNA) (primary outcome) and dietary inflammation score (secondary outcome) at 6-months follow up, and Life Simple7 (LS7) - a cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk score - at 6 months and 1-year (secondary outcome). Finally, guided by a racism-conscious adaptation of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we will conduct a mixed-methods process evaluation with key stakeholders to understand multi-level influences on CRC screening and CVD risk behaviors.

Discussion

Church-placed CHWs are trusted influential connectors between communities and health systems. Studies have shown that these CHWs can successfully implement health prevention protocols in churches, including those related to cancer control, making them potentially important community mediators of CRC screening uptake and CRC/CVD risk reduction.

Trial registration

NCT05174286.

Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunisation (MI4MI) study: a protocol for an implementation study of a clinician vaccine communication intervention for prenatal care settings

INTRODUCTION

Vaccination against influenza and pertussis in pregnancy offers a 'two-for-one' opportunity to protect mother and child. Pregnant patients have increased risk of severe disease from influenza and newborns have increased risk of severe disease from both influenza and pertussis. Obstetricians need communication tools to support their self-efficacy and effectiveness in communicating the importance of immunisation during pregnancy and ultimately improving maternal vaccination rates.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We describe the protocol for a pragmatic study testing the feasibility and potential impact of a clinician communication strategy on maternal vaccination uptake. This study will be conducted in five prenatal care settings in Colorado, USA. The Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunisation strategy involves training prenatal care providers to use motivational interviewing in the vaccine conversation with pregnant patients. Our primary outcomes will be the adoption and implementation of the intervention measured using the Enhanced RE-AIM/Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model for dissemination and implementation. Secondary outcomes will include provider time spent, fidelity to Motivational Interviewing and self-efficacy measured through audio recorded visits and provider surveys, patients' visit experience based on audio recorded visits and follow-up interviews, and maternal vaccine uptake as measured through chart reviews.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study is approved by the following institutional review boards: Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed manuscripts and conference presentations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04302675.

'Presumptively Initiating Vaccines and Optimizing Talk with Motivational Interviewing' (PIVOT with MI) trial: a protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a clinician vaccine communication intervention

INTRODUCTION

A key contributor to underimmunisation is parental refusal or delay of vaccines due to vaccine concerns. Many clinicians lack confidence in communicating with vaccine-hesitant parents (VHP) and perceive that their discussions will do little to change parents' minds. Improving clinician communication with VHPs is critical to increasing childhood vaccine uptake.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We describe the protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial to test the impact of a novel, multifaceted clinician vaccine communication strategy on child immunisation status. The trial will be conducted in 24 primary care practices in two US states (Washington and Colorado). The strategy is called Presumptively Initiating Vaccines and Optimizing Talk with Motivational Interviewing (PIVOT with MI), and involves clinicians initiating the vaccine conversation with all parents of young children using the presumptive format, and among those parents who resist vaccines, pivoting to using MI. Our primary outcome is the immunisation status of children of VHPs at 19 months, 0 day of age expressed as the percentage of days underimmunised from birth to 19 months for 22 doses of eight vaccines recommended during this interval. Secondary outcomes include clinician experience communicating with VHPs, parent visit experience and clinician adherence to the PIVOT with MI communication strategy.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study is approved by the following institutional review boards: Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board, Washington State Institutional Review Board and Swedish Health Services Institutional Review Board. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed manuscripts and conference presentations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03885232.

Impact of Depression and Demoralization on Blood Pressure Control in African Americans with Hypertension: Findings from the TRIUMPH Trial

BACKGROUND

African Americans develop hypertension earlier and have worse cardiovascular outcomes than Caucasians. Accumulating evidence suggests that psychological distress may play a role in the observed racial differences in hypertension. Several studies have investigated the relationship between depression and hypertension while little is still known about the role of demoralization.

METHODS

Using data from the Trial Using Motivational Interviewing, Positive Affect, and Self-affirmation in African Americans with Hypertension (TRIUMPH), logistic regression models were used to estimate differences in blood pressure control at 12 months among participants with demoralization, depression, and both conditions.

RESULTS

Our logistic models showed that reported psychosocial symptoms significantly differed in predicting success in blood pressure control at 12 months. Contrast analyses showed that, after adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial variables, demoralized patients were less likely to achieve blood pressure control than participants without affective conditions (p = 0.020). Similar results emerged for patients with depression (p = 0.042) and both conditions (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Depression can be extremely debilitating and has serious health consequence. Our findings confirm this result and show that, even though depression and demoralization share common features, they are two distinct clinical phenomena with similar negative impact on blood pressure control in African Americans.

Results from the Trial Using Motivational Interviewing, Positive Affect, and Self-Affirmation in African Americans with Hypertension (TRIUMPH)

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to determine the effectiveness of combining positive affect and self-affirmation strategies with motivational interviewing in achieving blood pressure control among hypertensive African Americans (AA) compared with AA hypertensives in an education-only control group.

DESIGN

Randomized trial.

SETTING

Ambulatory practices in the South Bronx and Harlem, New York City.

PARTICIPANTS

African American adults with uncontrolled hypertension.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized to a positive affect and self-affirmation intervention or an education control group. The positive affect and self-affirmation intervention involved having participants think about things that made them happy and that reminded them of their core values on a daily basis. These strategies were reinforced every two months through motivational interviewing. The control arm received a workbook of strategies on blood pressure control. All participants were called every two months for one year.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Blood pressure control rate.

RESULTS

A total of 238 participants were randomized. The average age was 56 ± 11 years, approximately 70% were female, 80% were not married, and up to 70% had completed high school. There was no difference in control rates between the intervention and the control group. However, at one year, female participants were more likely to be controlled. Participants with high depressive symptoms or high perceived stress at baseline were less likely to be controlled.

CONCLUSIONS

While this study did not demonstrate an intervention effect, it does provide important insight into the psychosocial factors that may underlie blood pressure control in African Americans. Implications for future behavioral intervention trials are discussed.

Small Changes and Lasting Effects (SCALE) Trial: the formation of a weight loss behavioral intervention using EVOLVE

Background

Obesity is a major health problem that disproportionately affects Black and Hispanic adults. This paper presents the rationale and innovative design of a small change eating and physical activity intervention (SC) combined with a positive affect and self-affirmation (PA/SA) intervention versus the SC intervention alone for weight loss.

Methods

Using a mixed methods translational model (EVOLVE), we designed and tested a SC approach intervention in overweight and/ or obese African American and Hispanic adults. In Phase I, we explored participant’s values and beliefs about the small change approach. In Phase II, we tested and refined the intervention and then, in Phase III we conducted a RCT. Participants were randomized to the SC approach with PA/SA intervention vs. a SC approach alone for 12 months. The primary outcome was clinically significant weight loss at 12 months.

Results

Over 4.5 years a total of 574 participants (67 in Phase I, 102 in Phase II and 405 in Phase III) were enrolled. Phase I findings were used to create a workbook based on real life experiences about weight loss and to refine the small change eating strategies. Phase II results shaped the recruitment and retention strategy for the RCT, as well as the final intervention. The RCT results are currently under analysis.

Conclusion

The present study seeks to determine if a SC approach combined with a PA/SA intervention will result in greater weight loss at 12 months in Black and Hispanic adults compared to a SC approach alone.

Development and validation of the Hypertension Self-care Profile: a practical tool to measure hypertension self-care

BACKGROUND

Adequate self-care is crucial for blood pressure control. A number of hypertension (HBP) self-care instruments are available, but existing tools do not capture all the critical domains of HBP self-care and have limited evidence of reliability and validity.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a new tool--the HBP Self-Care Profile (HBP SCP)--in a sample of inner-city residents.

METHODS

The HBP SCP encompasses comprehensive domains of HBP self-care behaviors. Guided by 2 validated theoretical approaches--Orem's self-care model and Motivational Interviewing--the HBP SCP includes 3 scales that can be used together or independently: Behavior, Motivation, and Self-efficacy. The sample included 213 English-speaking inner-city residents with HBP (mean age, 68.6 years; 76.1% women; 81.7% African American).

RESULTS

Item-total correlations ranged from 0.20 to 0.63 for Behavior, 0.46 to 0.70 for Motivation, and 0.40 to 0.74 for Self-efficacy, meeting the cutoff set a priori at 0.15. Internal consistency reliability coefficients ranged from 0.83 to 0.93. Concurrent and construct validities of the HBP SCP were achieved by significant correlations between HBP SCP scales and theoretically selected instruments (P < .05 for all correlation coefficients). The HBP SCP-Behavior scale also successfully discriminated between those with or without blood pressure control (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The reliability and validity of the HBP SCP were supported in this sample of inner-city residents with HBP. The high reliability estimates and strong evidence of validity should allow researchers to use the HBP SCP to assess and identify gaps in HBP self-care behavior, motivation, and self-efficacy. Future research is warranted to evaluate the HBP SCP in diverse ethnic and age samples of hypertensive patient populations.

Ethical considerations for conducting health disparities research in community health centers: a social-ecological perspective

Community health centers (CHCs) provide optimal research settings. They serve a high-risk, medically underserved population in the greatest need of intervention. Low socioeconomic status renders this population particularly vulnerable to research misconduct. Traditional principles of research ethics are often applied to participants only. The social-ecological model offers a comprehensive framework for applying these principles across multiple levels (participants, providers, organizations, communities, and policy). Our experience with the Trial Using Motivational Interviewing, Positive Affect and Self-Affirmation in African-Americans with Hypertension, a randomized trial conducted in CHCs, led us to propose a new platform for discussing research ethics; examine the social, community, and political factors surrounding research conducted in CHCs; and recommend how future research should be conducted in such settings.