Eukaryotic Transcription Turns 50

Structures and compositional dynamics of Mediator in transcription regulation

The eukaryotic Mediator, comprising a large Core (cMED) and a dissociable CDK8 kinase module (CKM), functions as a critical coregulator during RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) transcription. cMED recruits RNAPII and facilitates the assembly of the pre-initiation complex (PIC) at promoters. In contrast, CKM prevents RNAPII binding to cMED while simultaneously exerting positive or negative influence on gene transcription through its kinase function. Recent structural studies on cMED and CKM have revealed their intricate architectures and subunit interactions. Here, we explore these structures, providing a comprehensive insight into Mediator (cMED-CKM) architecture and its potential mechanism in regulating RNAPII transcription. Additionally, we discuss the remaining puzzles that require further investigation to fully understand how cMED coordinates with CKM to regulate transcription in various events.

Mechanism of ERBB2 gene overexpression by the formation of super-enhancer with genomic structural abnormalities in lung adenocarcinoma without clinically actionable genetic alterations

BACKGROUND

In an extensive genomic analysis of lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs), driver mutations have been recognized as potential targets for molecular therapy. However, there remain cases where target genes are not identified. Super-enhancers and structural variants are frequently identified in several hundred loci per case. Despite this, most cancer research has approached the analysis of these data sets separately, without merging and comparing the data, and there are no examples of integrated analysis in LUAD.

METHODS

We performed an integrated analysis of super-enhancers and structural variants in a cohort of 174 LUAD cases that lacked clinically actionable genetic alterations. To achieve this, we conducted both WGS and H3K27Ac ChIP-seq analyses using samples with driver gene mutations and those without, allowing for a comprehensive investigation of the potential roles of super-enhancer in LUAD cases.

RESULTS

We demonstrate that most genes situated in these overlapped regions were associated with known and previously unknown driver genes and aberrant expression resulting from the formation of super-enhancers accompanied by genomic structural abnormalities. Hi-C and long-read sequencing data further corroborated this insight. When we employed CRISPR-Cas9 to induce structural abnormalities that mimicked cases with outlier ERBB2 gene expression, we observed an elevation in ERBB2 expression. These abnormalities are associated with a higher risk of recurrence after surgery, irrespective of the presence or absence of driver mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that aberrant gene expression linked to structural polymorphisms can significantly impact personalized cancer treatment by facilitating the identification of driver mutations and prognostic factors, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of LUAD pathogenesis.

SEC: A core hub during cell fate alteration

Pol II pause release is a rate-limiting step in gene transcription, influencing various cell fate alterations. Numerous proteins orchestrate Pol II pause release, thereby playing pivotal roles in the intricate process of cellular fate modulation. Super elongation complex (SEC), a large assembly comprising diverse protein components, has garnered attention due to its emerging significance in orchestrating physiological and pathological cellular identity changes by regulating the transcription of crucial genes. Consequently, SEC emerges as a noteworthy functional complex capable of modulating cell fate alterations. Therefore, a comprehensive review is warranted to systematically summarize the core roles of SEC in different types of cell fate alterations. This review focuses on elucidating the current understanding of the structural and functional basis of SEC. Additionally, we discuss the intricate regulatory mechanisms governing SEC in various models of cell fate alteration, encompassing both physiological and pathological contexts. Furthermore, leveraging the existing knowledge of SEC, we propose some insightful directions for future research, aiming to enhance our mechanistic and functional comprehension of SEC within the diverse landscape of cell fate alterations.

An alpha-herpesvirus employs host HEXIM1 to promote viral transcription

Although it is widely accepted that herpesviruses utilize host RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) to transcribe viral genes, the mechanism of utilization varies significantly among herpesviruses. With the exception of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) in alpha-herpesviruses, the mechanism by which RNAPII transcribes viral genes in the remaining alpha-herpesviruses has not been reported. In this study, we investigated the transcriptional mechanism of an avian alpha-herpesvirus, Anatid herpesvirus 1 (AnHV-1). We discovered for the first time that hexamethylene-bis-acetamide-inducing protein 1 (HEXIM1), a major inhibitor of positive elongation factor B (P-TEFb), was significantly upregulated during AnHV-1 infection, and its expression was dynamically regulated throughout the progression of the disease. However, the expression level of HEXIM1 remained stable before and after HSV-1 infection. Excessive HEXIM1 assists AnHV-1 in progeny virus production, gene expression, and RNA polymerase II recruitment by promoting the formation of more inactive P-TEFb and the loss of RNAPII S2 phosphorylation. Conversely, the expression of some host survival-related genes, such as SOX8, CDK1, MYC, and ID2, was suppressed by HEXIM1 overexpression. Further investigation revealed that the C-terminus of the AnHV-1 US1 gene is responsible for the upregulation of HEXIM1 by activating its promoter but not by interacting with P-TEFb, which is the mechanism adopted by its homologs, HSV-1 ICP22. Additionally, the virus proliferation deficiency caused by US1 deletion during the early infection stage could be partially rescued by HEXIM1 overexpression, suggesting that HEXIM1 is responsible for AnHV-1 gaining transcription advantages when competing with cells. Taken together, this study revealed a novel HEXIM1-dependent AnHV-1 transcription mechanism, which has not been previously reported in herpesvirus or even DNA virus studies.IMPORTANCEHexamethylene-bis-acetamide-inducing protein 1 (HEXIM1) has been identified as an inhibitor of positive transcriptional elongation factor b associated with cancer, AIDS, myocardial hypertrophy, and inflammation. Surprisingly, no previous reports have explored the role of HEXIM1 in herpesvirus transcription. This study reveals a mechanism distinct from the currently known herpesvirus utilization of RNA polymerase II, highlighting the dependence on high HEXIM1 expression, which may be a previously unrecognized facet of the host shutoff manifested by many DNA viruses. Moreover, this discovery expands the significance of HEXIM1 in pathogen infection. It raises intriguing questions about whether other herpesviruses employ similar mechanisms to manipulate HEXIM1 and if this molecular target can be exploited to limit productive replication. Thus, this discovery not only contributes to our understanding of herpesvirus infection regulation but also holds implications for broader research on other herpesviruses, even DNA viruses.

PhyloString: A web server designed to identify, visualize, and evaluate functional relationships between orthologous protein groups across different phylogenetic lineages

Proteins are biological units whose essence is defined by their functional relationships with other proteins or biomolecules such as RNA, DNA, lipids, or carbohydrates. These functions encompass enzymatic, structural, regulatory, or physical interaction roles. The STRING database (Nucleic Acids Research, 8 Jan 2021;49(D1): D605-12) provides an index that defines the functional interaction networks between proteins in model organisms. To facilitate the identification, visualization, and evaluation of potential functional networks across organisms from different phylogenetic lineages, we have developed PhyloString (https://biocomputo.ibt.unam.mx/phylostring/), a web server that utilizes the indices of the STRING database. PhyloString decomposes these functional networks into modules, representing cohesive units of proteins grouped based on their similarity of STRING values and the phylogenetic origins of their respective organisms. This study presents and thoroughly discusses examples of such functional networks and their modules identified using PhyloString.

Activity-assembled nBAF complex mediates rapid immediate early gene transcription by regulating RNA Polymerase II productive elongation

Signal-dependent RNA Polymerase II (Pol2) productive elongation is an integral component of gene transcription, including those of immediate early genes (IEGs) induced by neuronal activity. However, it remains unclear how productively elongating Pol2 overcome nucleosomal barriers. Using RNAi, three degraders, and several small molecule inhibitors, we show that the mammalian SWI/SNF complex of neurons (neuronal BAF, or nBAF) is required for activity-induced transcription of neuronal IEGs, including Arc . The nBAF complex facilitates promoter-proximal Pol2 pausing, signal-dependent Pol2 recruitment (loading), and importantly, mediates productive elongation in the gene body via interaction with the elongation complex and elongation-competent Pol2. Mechanistically, Pol2 elongation is mediated by activity-induced nBAF assembly (especially, ARID1A recruitment) and its ATPase activity. Together, our data demonstrate that the nBAF complex regulates several aspects of Pol2 transcription and reveal mechanisms underlying activity-induced Pol2 elongation. These findings may offer insights into human maladies etiologically associated with mutational interdiction of BAF functions.

Tho2 is critical for the recruitment of Rrp6 to chromatin in response to perturbed mRNP biogenesis

The eukaryotic THO complex coordinates the assembly of so-called messenger RNA-ribonucleoprotein particles (mRNPs), a process that involves cotranscriptional coating of nascent mRNAs with proteins. Once formed, mRNPs undergo a quality control step that marks them either for active transport to the cytoplasm, or Rrp6/RNA exosome-mediated degradation in the nucleus. However, the mechanism behind the quality control of nascent mRNPs is still unclear. We investigated the cotranscriptional quality control of mRNPs in budding yeast by expressing the bacterial Rho helicase, which globally perturbs yeast mRNP formation. We examined the genome-wide binding profiles of the THO complex subunits Tho2, Thp2, Hpr1, and Mft1 upon perturbation of the mRNP biogenesis, and found that Tho2 plays two roles. In addition to its function as a subunit of the THO complex, upon perturbation of mRNP biogenesis Tho2 targets Rrp6 to chromatin via its carboxy-terminal domain. Interestingly, other THO subunits are not enriched on chromatin upon perturbation of mRNP biogenesis and are not necessary for localizing Rrp6 at its target loci. Our study highlights the potential role of Tho2 in cotranscriptional mRNP quality control, which is independent of other THO subunits. Considering that both the THO complex and the RNA exosome are evolutionarily highly conserved, our findings are likely relevant for mRNP surveillance in mammals.

Never a dull enzyme, RNA polymerase II

RNA polymerase II (Pol II) is composed of 12 subunits that collaborate to synthesize mRNA within the nucleus. Pol II is widely recognized as a passive holoenzyme, with the molecular functions of its subunits largely ignored. Recent studies employing auxin-inducible degron (AID) and multi-omics techniques have revealed that the functional diversity of Pol II is achieved through the differential contributions of its subunits to various transcriptional and post-transcriptional processes. By regulating these processes in a coordinated manner through its subunits, Pol II can optimize its activity for diverse biological functions. Here, we review recent progress in understanding Pol II subunits and their dysregulation in diseases, Pol II heterogeneity, Pol II clusters and the regulatory roles of RNA polymerases.

RNA Polymerase II evolution and adaptations: Insights from Plasmodium and other parasitic protists

The C-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II plays a crucial role in regulating transcription dynamics in eukaryotes. The phosphorylation of serine residues within the CTD controls transcription initiation, elongation, and termination. While the CTD is highly conserved across eukaryotes, lower eukaryotes like protists, including Plasmodium, exhibit some differences. In this study, we performed a comparative analysis of CTD in eukaryotic systems to understand why the parasites evolved in this particular manner. The Plasmodium falciparum RPB1 is exceptionally large and feature a gap between the first and second heptad repeats, resulting in fifteen canonical heptad repeats excluding the initial repeat. Analysis of this intervening sequence revealed sub motifs of heptads where two serine residues occupy the first and fourth positions (S1X2X3S4). These motifs lie in the intrinsically disordered region of RPB1, a characteristic feature of the CTD. Interestingly, the S1X2X3S4 sub-motif was also observed in early-divergingeukaryotes like Leishmania major, which lack canonical heptad repeats. Furthermore, eukaryotes across the phylogenetic tree revealed a sigmoid pattern of increasing serine frequency in the CTD, indicating that serine enrichment is a significant step in the evolution of heptad-rich RPB1. Based on these observations and analysis, we proposed an evolutionary model for RNA Polymerase II CTD, encompassing organisms previously deemed exceptions, notably Plasmodium species. Thus, our study provides novel insights into the evolution of the CTD and will prompt further investigations into the differences exhibited by Plasmodium RNA Pol II and determine if they confer a survival advantage to the parasite.

Broad compatibility between yeast UAS elements and core promoters and identification of promoter elements that determine cofactor specificity

Three classes of yeast protein-coding genes are distinguished by their dependence on the transcription cofactors TFIID, SAGA, and Mediator (MED) Tail, but whether this dependence is determined by the core promoter, upstream activating sequences (UASs), or other gene features is unclear. Also unclear is whether UASs can broadly activate transcription from the different promoter classes. Here, we measure transcription and cofactor specificity for thousands of UAS-core promoter combinations and find that most UASs broadly activate promoters regardless of regulatory class, while few display strong promoter specificity. However, matching UASs and promoters from the same gene class is generally important for optimal expression. We find that sensitivity to rapid depletion of MED Tail or SAGA is dependent on the identity of both UAS and core promoter, while dependence on TFIID localizes to only the promoter. Finally, our results suggest the role of TATA and TATA-like promoter sequences in MED Tail function.

The super elongation complex (SEC) mediates phase transition of SPT5 during transcriptional pause release

Release of promoter-proximally paused RNA Pol II into elongation is a tightly regulated and rate-limiting step in metazoan gene transcription. However, the biophysical mechanism underlying pause release remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate that the pausing and elongation regulator SPT5 undergoes phase transition during transcriptional pause release. SPT5 per se is prone to form clusters. The disordered domain in SPT5 is required for pause release and gene activation. During early elongation, the super elongation complex (SEC) induces SPT5 transition into elongation droplets. Depletion of SEC increases SPT5 pausing clusters. Furthermore, disease-associated SEC mutations impair phase properties of elongation droplets and transcription. Our study suggests that SEC-mediated SPT5 phase transition might be essential for pause release and early elongation and that aberrant phase properties could contribute to transcription abnormality in diseases.

P-TEFb: The master regulator of transcription elongation

The positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb) is composed of cyclins T1 or T2 and cyclin-dependent kinase 9 that regulate the elongation phase of transcription by RNA polymerase II. By antagonizing negative elongation factors and phosphorylating the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II, P-TEFb facilitates the elongation and co-transcriptional processing of nascent transcripts. This step is critical for the expression of most eukaryotic genes. In growing cells, P-TEFb is regulated negatively by its reversible associations with HEXIM1/2 in the 7SK snRNP and positively by a number of transcription factors, as well as the super elongation complex. In resting cells, P-TEFb falls apart, and cyclin T1 is degraded by the proteasome. This complex regulation of P-TEFb has evolved for the precise temporal and spatial regulation of gene expression in the organism. Its dysregulation contributes to inflammatory and neoplastic conditions.

Cross-regulome profiling of RNA polymerases highlights the regulatory role of polymerase III on mRNA transcription by maintaining local chromatin architecture

BACKGROUND

Mammalian cells have three types of RNA polymerases (Pols), Pol I, II, and III. However, the extent to which these polymerases are cross-regulated and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear.

RESULTS

We employ genome-wide profiling after acute depletion of Pol I, Pol II, or Pol III to assess cross-regulatory effects between these Pols. We find that these enzymes mainly affect the transcription of their own target genes, while certain genes are transcribed by the other polymerases. Importantly, the most active type of crosstalk is exemplified by the fact that Pol III depletion affects Pol II transcription. Pol II genes with transcription changes upon Pol III depletion are enriched in diverse cellular functions, and Pol III binding sites are found near their promoters. However, these Pol III binding sites do not correspond to transfer RNAs. Moreover, we demonstrate that Pol III regulates Pol II transcription and chromatin binding of the facilitates chromatin transcription (FACT) complex to alter local chromatin structures, which in turn affects the Pol II transcription rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support a model suggesting that RNA polymerases show cross-regulatory effects: Pol III affects local chromatin structures and the FACT-Pol II axis to regulate the Pol II transcription rate at certain gene loci. This study provides a new perspective for understanding the dysregulation of Pol III in various tissues affected by developmental diseases.

Targeted protein degradation reveals RNA Pol II heterogeneity and functional diversity

RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II) subunits are thought to be involved in various transcription-associated processes, but it is unclear whether they play different regulatory roles in modulating gene expression. Here, we performed nascent and mature transcript sequencing after the acute degradation of 12 mammalian RNA Pol II subunits and profiled their genomic binding sites and protein interactomes to dissect their molecular functions. We found that RNA Pol II subunits contribute differently to RNA Pol II cellular localization and transcription processes and preferentially regulate RNA processing (such as RNA splicing and 3' end maturation). Genes sensitive to the depletion of different RNA Pol II subunits tend to be involved in diverse biological functions and show different RNA half-lives. Sequences, associated protein factors, and RNA structures are correlated with RNA Pol II subunit-mediated differential gene expression. These findings collectively suggest that the heterogeneity of RNA Pol II and different genes appear to depend on some of the subunits.

Function moves biomolecular condensates in phase space

Phase separation underlies the formation of biomolecular condensates. We hypothesize the cellular processes that occur within condensates shape their structural features. We use the example of transcription to discuss structure-function relationships in condensates. Various types of transcriptional condensates have been reported across the evolutionary spectrum in the cell nucleus as well as in mitochondrial and bacterial nucleoids. In vitro and in vivo observations suggest that transcriptional activity of condensates influences their supramolecular structure, which in turn affects their function. Condensate organization thus becomes driven by differences in miscibility among the DNA and proteins of the transcription machinery and the RNA transcripts they generate. These considerations are in line with the notion that cellular processes shape the structural properties of condensates, leading to a dynamic, mutual interplay between structure and function in the cell.

Several Isoforms for Each Subunit Shared by RNA Polymerases are Differentially Expressed in the Cultivated Olive Tree (Olea europaea L.)

Plants contain five nuclear RNA polymerases, with RNA pols IV and V in addition to conserved eukaryotic RNA pols I, II, and III. These transcriptional complexes share five common subunits, which have been extensively analyzed only in yeasts. By taking advantage of the recently published olive tree cultivar (Olea europaea L. cv. Picual) genome, we performed a genome-wide analysis of the genomic composition corresponding to subunits common to RNA pols. The cultivated olive tree genome is quite complex and contains many genes with several copies. We also investigated, for the first time, gene expression patterns for subunits common to RNA pols using RNA-Seq under different economically and biologically relevant conditions for the cultivar "Picual": tissues/organs, biotic and abiotic stresses, and early development from seeds. Our results demonstrated the existence of a multigene family of subunits common to RNA pols, and a variable number of paralogs for each subunit in the olive cultivar "Picual." Furthermore, these isoforms display specific and differentiated expression profiles depending on the isoform and growth conditions, which may be relevant for their role in olive tree biology.

Imaging Organization of RNA Processing within the Nucleus

Within the nucleus, messenger RNA is generated and processed in a highly organized and regulated manner. Messenger RNA processing begins during transcription initiation and continues until the RNA is translated and degraded. Processes such as 5' capping, alternative splicing, and 3' end processing have been studied extensively with biochemical methods and more recently with single-molecule imaging approaches. In this review, we highlight how imaging has helped understand the highly dynamic process of RNA processing. We conclude with open questions and new technological developments that may further our understanding of RNA processing.

The Core Promoter Is a Regulatory Hub for Developmental Gene Expression

The development of multicellular organisms and the uniqueness of each cell are achieved by distinct transcriptional programs. Multiple processes that regulate gene expression converge at the core promoter region, an 80 bp region that directs accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II (Pol II). In recent years, it has become apparent that the core promoter region is not a passive DNA component, but rather an active regulatory module of transcriptional programs. Distinct core promoter compositions were demonstrated to result in different transcriptional outputs. In this mini-review, we focus on the role of the core promoter, particularly its downstream region, as the regulatory hub for developmental genes. The downstream core promoter element (DPE) was implicated in the control of evolutionarily conserved developmental gene regulatory networks (GRNs) governing body plan in both the anterior-posterior and dorsal-ventral axes. Notably, the composition of the basal transcription machinery is not universal, but rather promoter-dependent, highlighting the importance of specialized transcription complexes and their core promoter target sequences as key hubs that drive embryonic development, differentiation and morphogenesis across metazoan species. The extent of transcriptional activation by a specific enhancer is dependent on its compatibility with the relevant core promoter. The core promoter content also regulates transcription burst size. Overall, while for many years it was thought that the specificity of gene expression is primarily determined by enhancers, it is now clear that the core promoter region comprises an important regulatory module in the intricate networks of developmental gene expression.

Dynamics of transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation

Despite gene expression programs being notoriously complex, RNA abundance is usually assumed as a proxy for transcriptional activity. Recently developed approaches, able to disentangle transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulatory processes, have revealed a more complex scenario. It is now possible to work out how synthesis, processing and degradation kinetic rates collectively determine the abundance of each gene's RNA. It has become clear that the same transcriptional output can correspond to different combinations of the kinetic rates. This underscores the fact that markedly different modes of gene expression regulation exist, each with profound effects on a gene's ability to modulate its own expression. This review describes the development of the experimental and computational approaches, including RNA metabolic labeling and mathematical modeling, that have been disclosing the mechanisms underlying complex transcriptional programs. Current limitations and future perspectives in the field are also discussed.

Regulation of Eukaryotic RNAPs Activities by Phosphorylation

Evolutionarily conserved kinases and phosphatases regulate RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) transcript synthesis by modifying the phosphorylation status of the carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD) of Rpb1, the largest subunit of RNAPII. Proper levels of Rpb1-CTD phosphorylation are required for RNA co-transcriptional processing and to coordinate transcription with other nuclear processes, such as chromatin remodeling and histone modification. Whether other RNAPII subunits are phosphorylated and influences their role in gene expression is still an unanswered question. Much less is known about RNAPI and RNAPIII phosphorylation, whose subunits do not contain functional CTDs. However, diverse studies have reported that several RNAPI and RNAPIII subunits are susceptible to phosphorylation. Some of these phosphorylation sites are distributed within subunits common to all three RNAPs whereas others are only shared between RNAPI and RNAPIII. This suggests that the activities of all RNAPs might be finely modulated by phosphorylation events and raises the idea of a tight coordination between the three RNAPs. Supporting this view, the transcription by all RNAPs is regulated by signaling pathways that sense different environmental cues to adapt a global RNA transcriptional response. This review focuses on how the phosphorylation of RNAPs might regulate their function and we comment on the regulation by phosphorylation of some key transcription factors in the case of RNAPI and RNAPIII. Finally, we discuss the existence of possible common mechanisms that could coordinate their activities.

Biogenesis of RNA Polymerases in Yeast

Eukaryotic RNA polymerases (RNA pols) transcriptional processes have been extensively investigated, and the structural analysis of eukaryotic RNA pols has been explored. However, the global assembly and biogenesis of these heteromultimeric complexes have been narrowly studied. Despite nuclear transcription being carried out by three RNA polymerases in eukaryotes (five in plants) with specificity in the synthesis of different RNA types, the biogenesis process has been proposed to be similar, at least for RNA pol II, to that of bacteria, which contains only one RNA pol. The formation of three different interacting subassembly complexes to conform the complete enzyme in the cytoplasm, prior to its nuclear import, has been assumed. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, recent studies have examined in depth the biogenesis of RNA polymerases by characterizing some elements involved in the assembly of these multisubunit complexes, some of which are conserved in humans. This study reviews the latest studies governing the mechanisms and proteins described as being involved in the biogenesis of RNA polymerases in yeast.

Protein phosphatases in the RNAPII transcription cycle: erasers, sculptors, gatekeepers, and potential drug targets

In this review, Cossa et al. discuss the current knowledge and outstanding questions about phosphatases in the context of the RNAPII transcription cycle.

The transcription cycle of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) is governed at multiple points by opposing actions of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and protein phosphatases, in a process with similarities to the cell division cycle. While important roles of the kinases have been established, phosphatases have emerged more slowly as key players in transcription, and large gaps remain in understanding of their precise functions and targets. Much of the earlier work focused on the roles and regulation of sui generis and often atypical phosphatases—FCP1, Rtr1/RPAP2, and SSU72—with seemingly dedicated functions in RNAPII transcription. Decisive roles in the transcription cycle have now been uncovered for members of the major phosphoprotein phosphatase (PPP) family, including PP1, PP2A, and PP4—abundant enzymes with pleiotropic roles in cellular signaling pathways. These phosphatases appear to act principally at the transitions between transcription cycle phases, ensuring fine control of elongation and termination. Much is still unknown, however, about the division of labor among the PPP family members, and their possible regulation by or of the transcriptional kinases. CDKs active in transcription have recently drawn attention as potential therapeutic targets in cancer and other diseases, raising the prospect that the phosphatases might also present opportunities for new drug development. Here we review the current knowledge and outstanding questions about phosphatases in the context of the RNAPII transcription cycle.

Eukaryotic RNA Polymerases: The Many Ways to Transcribe a Gene

In eukaryotic cells, three nuclear RNA polymerases (RNA pols) carry out the transcription from DNA to RNA, and they all seem to have evolved from a single enzyme present in the common ancestor with archaea. The multiplicity of eukaryotic RNA pols allows each one to remain specialized in the synthesis of a subset of transcripts, which are different in the function, length, cell abundance, diversity, and promoter organization of the corresponding genes. We hypothesize that this specialization of RNA pols has conditioned the evolution of the regulatory mechanisms used to transcribe each gene subset to cope with environmental changes. We herein present the example of the homeostatic regulation of transcript levels versus changes in cell volume. We propose that the diversity and instability of messenger RNAs, transcribed by RNA polymerase II, have conditioned the appearance of regulatory mechanisms based on different gene promoter strength and mRNA stability. However, for the regulation of ribosomal RNA levels, which are very stable and transcribed mainly by RNA polymerase I from only one promoter, different mechanisms act based on gene copy variation, and a much simpler regulation of the synthesis rate.

Coronavirus-Replikation: Mechanismus und Inhibition durch Remdesivir

Coronaviruses use an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase to replicate and transcribe their RNA genome. The structure of the SARS-CoV-2 polymerase was determined by cryo-electron microscopy within a short time in spring 2020. The structure explains how the viral enzyme synthesizes RNA and how it replicates the exceptionally large genome in a processive manner. The most recent structure-function studies further reveal the mechanism of polymerase inhibition by remdesivir, an approved drug for the treatment of COVID-19.

A novel in vitro Caenorhabditis elegans transcription system

BACKGROUND

Caenorhabditis elegans is an excellent model organism for biological research, but its contributions to biochemical elucidation of eukaryotic transcription mechanisms have been limited. One of the biggest obstacles for C. elegans biochemical studies is the high difficulty of obtaining functionally active nuclear extract due to its thick surrounding cuticle. A C. elegans in vitro transcription system was once developed by Lichtsteiner and Tjian in the 1990s, but it has not become widely used, most likely because the transcription reactions were re-constituted with nuclear extract from embryos, not from larval or adult worms, and the method of Dounce homogenization used to prepare the nuclear extract could lead to protein instability. Besides Dounce homogenization, several other techniques were developed to break worms, but no transcription reactions were re-constituted following worm disruption using these approaches. A C. elegans transcription system with effective preparation of functionally active nuclear extract from larval or adult worms has yet to be established. Additionally, non-radioactive methods for detecting transcription as alternatives to the conventional radioactive detection also need to be adapted into such an in vitro system.

RESULTS

By employing Balch homogenization, we achieved effective disruption of larval and adult worms and obtained functionally active nuclear extract through subcellular fractionation. In vitro transcription reactions were successfully re-constituted using such nuclear extract. Furthermore, a PCR-based non-radioactive detection method was adapted into our system to either qualitatively or quantitatively detect transcription. Using this system to assess how pathogen infection affects C. elegans transcription revealed that Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection changes transcription activity in a promoter- or gene-specific manner.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we developed an in vitro C. elegans transcription system that re-constitutes transcription reactions with nuclear extract of larval or adult worms and can both qualitatively and quantitatively detect transcription activity using non-radioactive approaches. This in vitro system is useful for biochemically studying C. elegans transcription mechanisms and gene expression regulation. The effective preparation of functionally active nuclear extract in our system fills a technical gap in biochemical studies of C. elegans and will expand the usefulness of this model organism in addressing many biological questions beyond transcription.

The highly diverse TATA box-binding proteins among protists: A review

Transcription is the first step of gene expression regulation and is a fundamental mechanism for establishing the viability and development of a cell. The TATA box-binding protein (TBP) interaction with a TATA box in a promoter is one of the best studied mechanisms in transcription initiation. TBP is a transcription factor that is highly conserved from archaea to humans and is essential for the transcription initiated by each of the three RNA polymerases. In addition, the discovery of TBP-related factor 1 (TRF1) and other factors related to TBP shed light on the variability among transcription initiation complexes, thus demonstrating that the compositions of these complexes are, in fact, more complicated than originally believed. Despite these facts, the majority of studies on transcription have been performed on animal, plant and fungal cells, which serve as canonical models, and information regarding protist cells is relatively scarce. The aim of this work is to review the diversity of the TBPs that have been documented in protists and describe some of the specific features that differentiate them from their counterparts in higher eukaryotes.

Of Keeping and Tipping the Balance: Host Regulation and Viral Modulation of IRF3-Dependent IFNB1 Expression

The type I interferon (IFN) response is a principal component of our immune system that allows to counter a viral attack immediately upon viral entry into host cells. Upon engagement of aberrantly localised nucleic acids, germline-encoded pattern recognition receptors convey their find via a signalling cascade to prompt kinase-mediated activation of a specific set of five transcription factors. Within the nucleus, the coordinated interaction of these dimeric transcription factors with coactivators and the basal RNA transcription machinery is required to access the gene encoding the type I IFN IFNβ (IFNB1). Virus-induced release of IFNβ then induces the antiviral state of the system and mediates further mechanisms for defence. Due to its key role during the induction of the initial IFN response, the activity of the transcription factor interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) is tightly regulated by the host and fiercely targeted by viral proteins at all conceivable levels. In this review, we will revisit the steps enabling the trans-activating potential of IRF3 after its activation and the subsequent assembly of the multi-protein complex at the IFNβ enhancer that controls gene expression. Further, we will inspect the regulatory mechanisms of these steps imposed by the host cell and present the manifold strategies viruses have evolved to intervene with IFNβ transcription downstream of IRF3 activation in order to secure establishment of a productive infection.

Transcription and Translation Inhibitors in Cancer Treatment

Transcription and translation are fundamental cellular processes that govern the protein production of cells. These processes are generally up regulated in cancer cells, to maintain the enhanced metabolism and proliferative state of these cells. As such cancerous cells can be susceptible to transcription and translation inhibitors. There are numerous druggable proteins involved in transcription and translation which make lucrative targets for cancer drug development. In addition to proteins, recent years have shown that the "undruggable" transcription factors and RNA molecules can also be targeted to hamper the transcription or translation in cancer. In this review, we summarize the properties and function of the transcription and translation inhibitors that have been tested and developed, focusing on the advances of the last 5 years. To complement this, we also discuss some of the recent advances in targeting oncogenes tightly controlling transcription including transcription factors and KRAS. In addition to natural and synthetic compounds, we review DNA and RNA based approaches to develop cancer drugs. Finally, we conclude with the outlook to the future of the development of transcription and translation inhibitors.

P-TEFb as A Promising Therapeutic Target

The positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb) was first identified as a general factor that stimulates transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II (RNAPII), but soon afterwards it turned out to be an essential cellular co-factor of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transcription mediated by viral Tat proteins. Studies on the mechanisms of Tat-dependent HIV transcription have led to radical advances in our knowledge regarding the mechanism of eukaryotic transcription, including the discoveries that P-TEFb-mediated elongation control of cellular transcription is a main regulatory step of gene expression in eukaryotes, and deregulation of P-TEFb activity plays critical roles in many human diseases and conditions in addition to HIV/AIDS. P-TEFb is now recognized as an attractive and promising therapeutic target for inflammation/autoimmune diseases, cardiac hypertrophy, cancer, infectious diseases, etc. In this review article, I will summarize our knowledge about basic P-TEFb functions, the regulatory mechanism of P-TEFb-dependent transcription, P-TEFb’s involvement in biological processes and diseases, and current approaches to manipulating P-TEFb functions for the treatment of these diseases.