Harnessing the potential of reverse-phase protein array technology: Advancing precision oncology strategies

The last few decades have seen remarkable strides in the field of cancer therapy. Precision oncology coupled with comprehensive genomic profiling has become routine clinical practice for solid tumors, the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has transformed the landscape of oncology treatment, and the number of cancer drug approvals has continued to increase. Nevertheless, the application of genomics-driven precision oncology has thus far benefited only 10%-20% of cancer patients, leaving the majority without matched treatment options. This limitation underscores the need to explore alternative avenues with regard to selecting patients for targeted therapies. In contrast with genomics-based approaches, proteomics-based strategies offer a more precise understanding of the intricate biological processes driving cancer pathogenesis. This perspective underscores the importance of integrating complementary proteomic analyses into the next phase of precision oncology to establish robust biomarker-drug associations and surmount challenges related to drug resistance. One promising technology in this regard is the reverse-phase protein array (RPPA), which excels in quantitatively detecting protein modifications, even with limited amounts of sample. Its cost-effectiveness and rapid turnaround time further bolster its appeal for application in clinical settings. Here, we review the current status of genomics-driven precision oncology, as well as its limitations, with an emphasis on drug resistance. Subsequently, we explore the application of RPPA technology as a catalyst for advancing precision oncology. Through illustrative examples drawn from clinical trials, we demonstrate its utility for unraveling the molecular mechanisms underlying drug responses and resistance.

Generation and mutational analysis of a transgenic murine model of the human MAF mutation

Aymé-Gripp syndrome is an autosomal dominant multisystem disorder. The major clinical features of this syndrome include congenital cataracts, sensorineural hearing loss, intellectual disability, and a distinctive flat facial appearance. MAF has been identified as a causative gene of the syndrome, and heterozygous variants owing to impairment in glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3)-mediated MAF phosphorylation shows related disorders. However, the underlying mechanisms of these types of disorders in affected individuals remain poorly understood. To explore the underlying mechanisms and discover new phenotypes, a murine model with a Maf mutation on a GSK3 phosphorylation motif, p.Thr58Ile, was generated using CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing. This is a homologous mutation to that in human patients. Our murine model exhibited similar phenotypes to those in humans, such as lens abnormalities, short stature, growth retardation, and abnormal skull morphology. The murine model showed decreased brain volume and malocclusion. Considering the sequencing and genotyping data, our models were successfully generated for the first time (to the best of our knowledge). Therefore, this study offers new and unique functional insights into human and murine MAF and novel clinical values of MAF pathogenic variants associated with changes in the functions of several organs based on a viable murine model.

The concept of the okadaic acid class of tumor promoters is revived in endogenous protein inhibitors of protein phosphatase 2A, SET and CIP2A, in human cancers

PURPOSE

The okadaic acid class of tumor promoters, which are inhibitors of protein phosphatases 1 and 2A (PP1 and PP2A), induced tumor promotion in mouse skin, rat glandular stomach, and rat liver. Endogenous protein inhibitors of PP2A, SET and CIP2A, were up-regulated in various human cancers, so it is vital to review the essential mechanisms of tumor promotion by the okadaic acid class compounds, together with cancer progression by SET and CIP2A in humans.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The first part of this review introduces the okadaic acid class compounds and the mechanism of tumor promotion: (1) inhibition of PP1 and PP2A activities of the okadaic acid class compounds; (2) some topics of tumor promotion; (3) TNF-α gene expression as a central mediator in tumor promotion; (4) exposure to the okadaic acid class of tumor promoters in relation to human cancer. The second part emphasizes the overexpression of SET and CIP2A in cancer progression, and the anticancer activity of SET antagonists as follows: (5) isolation and characterization of SET; (6) isolation and characterization of CIP2A; (7) progression of leukemia with SET; (8) progression of breast cancer with SET and CIP2A; (9) progression of lung cancer with SET; (10) anti-carcinogenic effects of SET antagonists OP449 and FTY720; and also (11) TNF-α-inducing protein of Helicobacter pylori, which is a clinical example of the okadaic acid pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

The overexpression of endogenous protein inhibitors of PP2A, SET and CIP2A, is tightly linked to the progression of various human cancers, as well as Alzheimer's disease.