1
|
Kołacz K, Robaszkiewicz A. PARP1 at the crossroad of cellular senescence and nucleolar processes. Ageing Res Rev 2024; 94:102206. [PMID: 38278370 DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
Senescent cells that occur in response to telomere shortening, oncogenes, extracellular and intracellular stress factors are characterized by permanent cell cycle arrest, the morphological and structural changes of the cell that include the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) and nucleoli rearrangement. The associated DNA lesions induce DNA damage response (DDR), which activates the DNA repair protein - poly-ADP-ribose polymerase 1 (PARP1). This protein consumes NAD+ to synthesize ADP-ribose polymer (PAR) on its own protein chain and on other interacting proteins. The involvement of PARP1 in nucleoli processes, such as rRNA transcription and ribosome biogenesis, the maintenance of heterochromatin and nucleoli structure, as well as controlling the crucial DDR protein release from the nucleoli to nucleus, links PARP1 with cellular senescence and nucleoli functioning. In this review we describe and discuss the impact of PARP1-mediated ADP-ribosylation on early cell commitment to senescence with the possible role of senescence-induced PARP1 transcriptional repression and protein degradation on nucleoli structure and function. The cause-effect interplay between PARP1 activation/decline and nucleoli functioning during senescence needs to be studied in detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kinga Kołacz
- Department of General Biophysics, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Pomorska 141/143, 90-236 Lodz, Poland; Bio-Med-Chem Doctoral School of the University of Lodz and Lodz Institutes of the Polish Academy of Sciences, University of Lodz, Banacha 12 /16, 90-237 Lodz, Poland.
| | - Agnieszka Robaszkiewicz
- Department of General Biophysics, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Pomorska 141/143, 90-236 Lodz, Poland; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Institute for Fundamental Biomedical Research (IFBR), 600 5th Street South, St. Petersburgh, FL 33701, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Durand S, Bruelle M, Bourdelais F, Bennychen B, Blin-Gonthier J, Isaac C, Huyghe A, Martel S, Seyve A, Vanbelle C, Adrait A, Couté Y, Meyronet D, Catez F, Diaz JJ, Lavial F, Ricci EP, Ducray F, Gabut M. RSL24D1 sustains steady-state ribosome biogenesis and pluripotency translational programs in embryonic stem cells. Nat Commun 2023; 14:356. [PMID: 36690642 PMCID: PMC9870888 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-36037-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Embryonic stem cell (ESC) fate decisions are regulated by a complex circuitry that coordinates gene expression at multiple levels from chromatin to mRNA processing. Recently, ribosome biogenesis and translation have emerged as key pathways that efficiently control stem cell homeostasis, yet the underlying molecular mechanisms remain largely unknown. Here, we identified RSL24D1 as highly expressed in both mouse and human pluripotent stem cells. RSL24D1 is associated with nuclear pre-ribosomes and is required for the biogenesis of 60S subunits in mouse ESCs. Interestingly, RSL24D1 depletion significantly impairs global translation, particularly of key pluripotency factors and of components from the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2). While having a moderate impact on differentiation, RSL24D1 depletion significantly alters ESC self-renewal and lineage commitment choices. Altogether, these results demonstrate that RSL24D1-dependant ribosome biogenesis is both required to sustain the expression of pluripotent transcriptional programs and to silence PRC2-regulated developmental programs, which concertedly dictate ESC homeostasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sébastien Durand
- Cancer Initiation and Tumoral Cell Identity (CITI) Department. Cancer Research Centre of Lyon (CRCL) INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Institut Convergence Plascan, Lyon, France
- Labex Dev2Can, Lyon, France
| | - Marion Bruelle
- Cancer Initiation and Tumoral Cell Identity (CITI) Department. Cancer Research Centre of Lyon (CRCL) INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Fleur Bourdelais
- Cancer Initiation and Tumoral Cell Identity (CITI) Department. Cancer Research Centre of Lyon (CRCL) INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Institut Convergence Plascan, Lyon, France
- Labex Dev2Can, Lyon, France
- Inovarion, 75005, Paris, France
| | - Bigitha Bennychen
- Dept. of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada
- Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre, National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0R6, Canada
| | - Juliana Blin-Gonthier
- Laboratoire de Biologie et de Modélisation de la Cellule, ENS de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5239, Inserm U1293, Lyon, France
| | - Caroline Isaac
- Cancer Initiation and Tumoral Cell Identity (CITI) Department. Cancer Research Centre of Lyon (CRCL) INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Institut Convergence Plascan, Lyon, France
- Labex Dev2Can, Lyon, France
| | - Aurélia Huyghe
- Cancer Initiation and Tumoral Cell Identity (CITI) Department. Cancer Research Centre of Lyon (CRCL) INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Institut Convergence Plascan, Lyon, France
- Labex Dev2Can, Lyon, France
- Equipe labellisée la Ligue contre le cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Sylvie Martel
- Cancer Initiation and Tumoral Cell Identity (CITI) Department. Cancer Research Centre of Lyon (CRCL) INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Institut Convergence Plascan, Lyon, France
| | - Antoine Seyve
- Cancer Initiation and Tumoral Cell Identity (CITI) Department. Cancer Research Centre of Lyon (CRCL) INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Institut Convergence Plascan, Lyon, France
- Neuro-oncology department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Christophe Vanbelle
- Cancer Initiation and Tumoral Cell Identity (CITI) Department. Cancer Research Centre of Lyon (CRCL) INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Institut Convergence Plascan, Lyon, France
| | - Annie Adrait
- University Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, CEA, UA13 BGE, CNRS, CEA, FR2048, 38000, Grenoble, France
| | - Yohann Couté
- University Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, CEA, UA13 BGE, CNRS, CEA, FR2048, 38000, Grenoble, France
| | - David Meyronet
- Cancer Initiation and Tumoral Cell Identity (CITI) Department. Cancer Research Centre of Lyon (CRCL) INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Institut Convergence Plascan, Lyon, France
- Institut de Pathologie Est, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Frédéric Catez
- Cancer Initiation and Tumoral Cell Identity (CITI) Department. Cancer Research Centre of Lyon (CRCL) INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Institut Convergence Plascan, Lyon, France
- Labex Dev2Can, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Jacques Diaz
- Cancer Initiation and Tumoral Cell Identity (CITI) Department. Cancer Research Centre of Lyon (CRCL) INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Institut Convergence Plascan, Lyon, France
- Labex Dev2Can, Lyon, France
| | - Fabrice Lavial
- Cancer Initiation and Tumoral Cell Identity (CITI) Department. Cancer Research Centre of Lyon (CRCL) INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Institut Convergence Plascan, Lyon, France
- Labex Dev2Can, Lyon, France
- Equipe labellisée la Ligue contre le cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Emiliano P Ricci
- Laboratoire de Biologie et de Modélisation de la Cellule, ENS de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5239, Inserm U1293, Lyon, France
| | - François Ducray
- Cancer Initiation and Tumoral Cell Identity (CITI) Department. Cancer Research Centre of Lyon (CRCL) INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Institut Convergence Plascan, Lyon, France
- Neuro-oncology department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Mathieu Gabut
- Cancer Initiation and Tumoral Cell Identity (CITI) Department. Cancer Research Centre of Lyon (CRCL) INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
- Institut Convergence Plascan, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yang YY, Liu J, Liu YT, Ong HH, Chen QM, Chen CB, Thong M, Xu X, Zhou SZ, Qiu QH, Wang DY. Moderate Dose Irradiation Induces DNA Damage and Impairments of Barrier and Host Defense in Nasal Epithelial Cells in vitro. J Inflamm Res 2022; 15:3661-3675. [PMID: 35783248 PMCID: PMC9242583 DOI: 10.2147/jir.s369385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Radiotherapy (RT) is the mainstay treatment for head and neck cancers. However, chronic and recurrent upper respiratory tract infections and inflammation have been commonly reported in patients post-RT. The underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Method and Materials We used a well-established model of human nasal epithelial cells (hNECs) that forms a pseudostratified layer in the air-liquid interface (ALI) and exposed it to single or repeated moderate dose γ-irradiation (1Gy). We assessed the DNA damage and evaluated the biological properties of hNECs at different time points post-RT. Further, we explored the host immunity alterations in irradiated hNECs with polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid sodium salt (poly [I:C]) and lipopolysaccharides (LPS). Results IR induced DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and triggered DNA damage response in hNECs. Repeated IR significantly reduced basal cell proliferation with low expression of p63/KRT5 and Ki67, induced cilia loss and inhibited mucus secretion. In addition, IR decreased ZO-1 expression and caused a significant decline in the transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER). Moreover, hyperreactive response against pathogen invasion and disrupted epithelial host defense can be observed in hNECs exposed to repeated IR. Conclusion Our study suggests that IR induced prolonged structural and functional impairments of hNECs may contribute to patients post-RT with increased risk of developing chronic and recurrent upper respiratory tract infection and inflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue-Ying Yang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Otolaryngology, Infectious Diseases Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jing Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology, Infectious Diseases Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yi-Tong Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hsiao-Hui Ong
- Department of Otolaryngology, Infectious Diseases Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Qian-Min Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology, Infectious Diseases Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ce-Belle Chen
- Centre for Ion Beam Applications, Department of Physics, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mark Thong
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Xinni Xu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Sui-Zi Zhou
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qian-Hui Qiu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Qian-Hui Qiu, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 106 Zhongshan Road II, Guangzhou, 510080, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 20 83827812, Email
| | - De-Yun Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Infectious Diseases Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- De-Yun Wang, Department of Otolaryngology, Infectious Diseases Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, 119228, Singapore, Tel + 65 6772 5373/5370/5371, Fax +65 6775 3820, Email
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Foroozani M, Holder DH, Deal RB. Histone Variants in the Specialization of Plant Chromatin. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY 2022; 73:149-172. [PMID: 35167758 PMCID: PMC9133179 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-070221-050044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
The basic unit of chromatin, the nucleosome, is an octamer of four core histone proteins (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) and serves as a fundamental regulatory unit in all DNA-templated processes. The majority of nucleosome assembly occurs during DNA replication when these core histones are produced en masse to accommodate the nascent genome. In addition, there are a number of nonallelic sequence variants of H2A and H3 in particular, known as histone variants, that can be incorporated into nucleosomes in a targeted and replication-independent manner. By virtue of their sequence divergence from the replication-coupled histones, these histone variants can impart unique properties onto the nucleosomes they occupy and thereby influence transcription and epigenetic states, DNA repair, chromosome segregation, and other nuclear processes in ways that profoundly affect plant biology. In this review, we discuss the evolutionary origins of these variants in plants, their known roles in chromatin, and their impacts on plant development and stress responses. We focus on the individual and combined roles of histone variants in transcriptional regulation within euchromatic and heterochromatic genome regions. Finally, we highlight gaps in our understanding of plant variants at the molecular, cellular, and organismal levels, and we propose new directions for study in the field of plant histone variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dylan H Holder
- Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA;
- Graduate Program in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Roger B Deal
- Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Herchenröther A, Wunderlich TM, Lan J, Hake SB. Spotlight on histone H2A variants: From B to X to Z. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2022; 135:3-12. [PMID: 35365397 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2022.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Chromatin, the functional organization of DNA with histone proteins in eukaryotic nuclei, is the tightly-regulated template for several biological processes, such as transcription, replication, DNA damage repair, chromosome stability and sister chromatid segregation. In order to achieve a reversible control of local chromatin structure and DNA accessibility, various interconnected mechanisms have evolved. One of such processes includes the deposition of functionally-diverse variants of histone proteins into nucleosomes, the building blocks of chromatin. Among core histones, the family of H2A histone variants exhibits the largest number of members and highest sequence-divergence. In this short review, we report and discuss recent discoveries concerning the biological functions of the animal histone variants H2A.B, H2A.X and H2A.Z and how dysregulation or mutation of the latter impacts the development of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tim M Wunderlich
- Institute for Genetics, Justus Liebig University, 35390 Giessen, Germany
| | - Jie Lan
- Institute for Genetics, Justus Liebig University, 35390 Giessen, Germany.
| | - Sandra B Hake
- Institute for Genetics, Justus Liebig University, 35390 Giessen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mir US, Bhat A, Mushtaq A, Pandita S, Altaf M, Pandita TK. Role of histone acetyltransferases MOF and Tip60 in genome stability. DNA Repair (Amst) 2021; 107:103205. [PMID: 34399315 DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
The accurate repair of DNA damage specifically the chromosomal double-strand breaks (DSBs) arising from exposure to physical or chemical agents, such as ionizing radiation (IR) and radiomimetic drugs is critical in maintaining genomic integrity. The DNA DSB response and repair is facilitated by hierarchical signaling networks that orchestrate chromatin structural changes specifically histone modifications which impact cell-cycle checkpoints through enzymatic activities to repair the broken DNA ends. Various histone posttranslational modifications such as phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation and ubiquitylation have been shown to play a role in DNA damage repair. Recent studies have provided important insights into the role of histone-specific modifications in sensing DNA damage and facilitating the DNA repair. Histone modifications have been shown to determine the pathway choice for repair of DNA DSBs. This review will summarize the role of important histone acetyltransferases MOF and Tip60 mediated acetylation in repair of DNA DSBs in eukaryotic cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulfat Syed Mir
- Chromatin and Epigenetics Lab, Department of Biotechnology, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, 190006, India
| | - Audesh Bhat
- Centre for Molecular Biology, Central University of Jammu, 181143, India
| | - Arjamand Mushtaq
- Chromatin and Epigenetics Lab, Department of Biotechnology, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, 190006, India
| | - Shruti Pandita
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Mohammad Altaf
- Chromatin and Epigenetics Lab, Department of Biotechnology, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, 190006, India; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovations, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, 190006, India.
| | - Tej K Pandita
- Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Clapier CR. Sophisticated Conversations between Chromatin and Chromatin Remodelers, and Dissonances in Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:5578. [PMID: 34070411 PMCID: PMC8197500 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22115578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The establishment and maintenance of genome packaging into chromatin contribute to define specific cellular identity and function. Dynamic regulation of chromatin organization and nucleosome positioning are critical to all DNA transactions-in particular, the regulation of gene expression-and involve the cooperative action of sequence-specific DNA-binding factors, histone modifying enzymes, and remodelers. Remodelers are molecular machines that generate various chromatin landscapes, adjust nucleosome positioning, and alter DNA accessibility by using ATP binding and hydrolysis to perform DNA translocation, which is highly regulated through sophisticated structural and functional conversations with nucleosomes. In this review, I first present the functional and structural diversity of remodelers, while emphasizing the basic mechanism of DNA translocation, the common regulatory aspects, and the hand-in-hand progressive increase in complexity of the regulatory conversations between remodelers and nucleosomes that accompanies the increase in challenges of remodeling processes. Next, I examine how, through nucleosome positioning, remodelers guide the regulation of gene expression. Finally, I explore various aspects of how alterations/mutations in remodelers introduce dissonance into the conversations between remodelers and nucleosomes, modify chromatin organization, and contribute to oncogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cedric R Clapier
- Department of Oncological Sciences & Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Eukaryotic nucleosomes organize chromatin by wrapping 147 bp of DNA around a histone core particle comprising two molecules each of histone H2A, H2B, H3 and H4. The DNA entering and exiting the particle may be bound by the linker histone H1. Whereas deposition of bulk histones is confined to S-phase, paralogs of the common histones, known as histone variants, are available to carry out functions throughout the cell cycle and accumulate in post-mitotic cells. Histone variants confer different structural properties on nucleosomes by wrapping more or less DNA or by altering nucleosome stability. They carry out specialized functions in DNA repair, chromosome segregation and regulation of transcription initiation, or perform tissue-specific roles. In this Cell Science at a Glance article and the accompanying poster, we briefly examine new insights into histone origins and discuss variants from each of the histone families, focusing on how structural differences may alter their functions. Summary: Histone variants change the structural properties of nucleosomes by wrapping more or less DNA, altering nucleosome stability or carrying out specialized functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul B Talbert
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Steven Henikoff
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Orlando L, Tanasijevic B, Nakanishi M, Reid JC, García-Rodríguez JL, Chauhan KD, Porras DP, Aslostovar L, Lu JD, Shapovalova Z, Mitchell RR, Boyd AL, Bhatia M. Phosphorylation state of the histone variant H2A.X controls human stem and progenitor cell fate decisions. Cell Rep 2021; 34:108818. [PMID: 33691101 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2017] [Revised: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Histone variants (HVs) are a subfamily of epigenetic regulators implicated in embryonic development, but their role in human stem cell fate remains unclear. Here, we reveal that the phosphorylation state of the HV H2A.X (γH2A.X) regulates self-renewal and differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) and leukemic progenitors. As demonstrated by CRISPR-Cas deletion, H2A.X is essential in maintaining normal hPSC behavior. However, reduced levels of γH2A.X enhances hPSC differentiation toward the hematopoietic lineage with concomitant inhibition of neural development. In contrast, activation and sustained levels of phosphorylated H2A.X enhance hPSC neural fate while suppressing hematopoiesis. This controlled lineage bias correlates to occupancy of γH2A.X at genomic loci associated with ectoderm versus mesoderm specification. Finally, drug modulation of H2A.X phosphorylation overcomes differentiation block of patient-derived leukemic progenitors. Our study demonstrates HVs may serve to regulate pluripotent cell fate and that this biology could be extended to somatic cancer stem cell control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Orlando
- McMaster University, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
| | - Borko Tanasijevic
- McMaster University, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
| | - Mio Nakanishi
- McMaster University, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
| | - Jennifer C Reid
- McMaster University, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
| | - Juan L García-Rodríguez
- McMaster University, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
| | - Kapil Dev Chauhan
- McMaster University, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
| | - Deanna P Porras
- McMaster University, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
| | - Lili Aslostovar
- McMaster University, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
| | - Justin D Lu
- McMaster University, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
| | - Zoya Shapovalova
- McMaster University, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
| | - Ryan R Mitchell
- McMaster University, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
| | - Allison L Boyd
- McMaster University, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
| | - Mickie Bhatia
- McMaster University, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Histone Acetyltransferase MOF Orchestrates Outcomes at the Crossroad of Oncogenesis, DNA Damage Response, Proliferation, and Stem Cell Development. Mol Cell Biol 2020; 40:MCB.00232-20. [PMID: 32661120 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.00232-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The DNA and protein complex known as chromatin is subject to posttranslational modifications (PTMs) that regulate cellular functions such that PTM dysregulation can lead to disease, including cancer. One critical PTM is acetylation/deacetylation, which is being investigated as a means to develop targeted cancer therapies. The histone acetyltransferase (HAT) family of proteins performs histone acetylation. In humans, MOF (hMOF), a member of the MYST family of HATs, acetylates histone H4 at lysine 16 (H4K16ac). MOF-mediated acetylation plays a critical role in the DNA damage response (DDR) and embryonic stem cell development. Functionally, MOF is found in two distinct complexes: NSL (nonspecific lethal) in humans and MSL (male-specific lethal) in flies. The NSL complex is also able to acetylate additional histone H4 sites. Dysregulation of MOF activity occurs in multiple cancers, including ovarian cancer, medulloblastoma, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and lung cancer. Bioinformatics analysis of KAT8, the gene encoding hMOF, indicated that it is highly overexpressed in kidney tumors as part of a concerted gene coexpression program that can support high levels of chromosome segregation and cell proliferation. The linkage between MOF and tumor proliferation suggests that there are additional functions of MOF that remain to be discovered.
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhang F, Wang J, Lü D, Zheng L, Shangguan B, Gao Y, Wu Y, Long M. Mechanomics analysis of hESCs under combined mechanical shear, stretch, and compression. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2020; 20:205-222. [PMID: 32809130 DOI: 10.1007/s10237-020-01378-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2019] [Accepted: 08/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) can differentiate to three germ layers within biochemical and biomechanical niches. The complicated mechanical environments in vivo could have diverse effects on the fate decision and biological functions of hESCs. To globally screen mechanosensitive molecules, three typical types of mechanical stimuli, i.e., tensile stretch, shear flow, and mechanical compression, were applied in respective parameter sets of loading pattern, amplitude, frequency, and/or duration, and then, iTRAQ proteomics test was used for identifying and quantifying differentially expressed proteins in hESCs. Bioinformatics analysis identified 37, 41, and 23 proteins under stretch pattern, frequency, and duration, 13, 18, and 41 proteins under shear pattern, amplitude, and duration, and 4, 0, and 183 proteins under compression amplitude, frequency, and duration, respectively, where distinct parameters yielded the differentially weighted preferences under each stimulus. Ten mechanosensitive proteins were commonly shared between two of three mechanical stimuli, together with numerous proteins identified under single stimulus. More importantly, functional GSEA and WGCNA analyses elaborated the variations of the screened proteins with loading parameters. Common functions in protein synthesis and modification were identified among three stimuli, and specific functions were observed in skin development under stretch alone. In conclusion, mechanomics analysis is indispensable to map actual mechanosensitive proteins under physiologically mimicking mechanical environment, and sheds light on understanding the core hub proteins in mechanobiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fan Zhang
- Center for Biomechanics and Bioengineering, Key Laboratory of Microgravity (National Microgravity Laboratory) and Beijing Key Laboratory of Engineered Construction and Mechanobiology, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.,School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Jiawen Wang
- Center for Biomechanics and Bioengineering, Key Laboratory of Microgravity (National Microgravity Laboratory) and Beijing Key Laboratory of Engineered Construction and Mechanobiology, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.,School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Dongyuan Lü
- Center for Biomechanics and Bioengineering, Key Laboratory of Microgravity (National Microgravity Laboratory) and Beijing Key Laboratory of Engineered Construction and Mechanobiology, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.,School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Lu Zheng
- Center for Biomechanics and Bioengineering, Key Laboratory of Microgravity (National Microgravity Laboratory) and Beijing Key Laboratory of Engineered Construction and Mechanobiology, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.,School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Bing Shangguan
- Center for Biomechanics and Bioengineering, Key Laboratory of Microgravity (National Microgravity Laboratory) and Beijing Key Laboratory of Engineered Construction and Mechanobiology, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China
| | - Yuxin Gao
- Center for Biomechanics and Bioengineering, Key Laboratory of Microgravity (National Microgravity Laboratory) and Beijing Key Laboratory of Engineered Construction and Mechanobiology, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China
| | - Yi Wu
- Center for Biomechanics and Bioengineering, Key Laboratory of Microgravity (National Microgravity Laboratory) and Beijing Key Laboratory of Engineered Construction and Mechanobiology, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.,School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Mian Long
- Center for Biomechanics and Bioengineering, Key Laboratory of Microgravity (National Microgravity Laboratory) and Beijing Key Laboratory of Engineered Construction and Mechanobiology, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China. .,School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sharifi S, da Costa HFR, Bierhoff H. The circuitry between ribosome biogenesis and translation in stem cell function and ageing. Mech Ageing Dev 2020; 189:111282. [PMID: 32531294 DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2020.111282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2020] [Revised: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Ribosome biogenesis takes place mainly in the nucleolus, a nuclear, non-membrane bound organelle forming around the gene arrays encoding ribosomal RNA (rRNA). Nucleolar activity comprises synthesis, processing and maturation of rRNAs, followed by their assembly with ribosomal proteins into pre-ribosomal particles. The final formation of translation-competent ribosomes in the cytoplasm is the prerequisite for protein synthesis, which is the most energy-consuming cellular process. In adult stem cells, ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis determine the switch between the quiescent and the activated state, but also decide whether activated stem cells self-renew or differentiate. Given this major impact on cellular function, it seems likely that perturbations of the circuitry between nucleolar activity and translation lead to ageing-related stem cell deterioration. This review provides an overview of how ribosome biogenesis and translation govern stem cell function and discusses the resultant implication in stem cell ageing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samim Sharifi
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Center for Molecular Biomedicine (CMB), Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Hans-Knöll-Str. 2, 07745 Jena, Germany; Leibniz-Institute on Aging - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI), Beutenbergstrasse 11, 07745 Jena, Germany
| | - Hugo Filipe Rangel da Costa
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Center for Molecular Biomedicine (CMB), Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Hans-Knöll-Str. 2, 07745 Jena, Germany
| | - Holger Bierhoff
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Center for Molecular Biomedicine (CMB), Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Hans-Knöll-Str. 2, 07745 Jena, Germany; Leibniz-Institute on Aging - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI), Beutenbergstrasse 11, 07745 Jena, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ribosome and Translational Control in Stem Cells. Cells 2020; 9:cells9020497. [PMID: 32098201 PMCID: PMC7072746 DOI: 10.3390/cells9020497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and adult stem cells (ASCs) possess the remarkable capacity to self-renew while remaining poised to differentiate into multiple progenies in the context of a rapidly developing embryo or in steady-state tissues, respectively. This ability is controlled by complex genetic programs, which are dynamically orchestrated at different steps of gene expression, including chromatin remodeling, mRNA transcription, processing, and stability. In addition to maintaining stem cell homeostasis, these molecular processes need to be rapidly rewired to coordinate complex physiological modifications required to redirect cell fate in response to environmental clues, such as differentiation signals or tissue injuries. Although chromatin remodeling and mRNA expression have been extensively studied in stem cells, accumulating evidence suggests that stem cell transcriptomes and proteomes are poorly correlated and that stem cell properties require finely tuned protein synthesis. In addition, many studies have shown that the biogenesis of the translation machinery, the ribosome, is decisive for sustaining ESC and ASC properties. Therefore, these observations emphasize the importance of translational control in stem cell homeostasis and fate decisions. In this review, we will provide the most recent literature describing how ribosome biogenesis and translational control regulate stem cell functions and are crucial for accommodating proteome remodeling in response to changes in stem cell fate.
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
In eukaryotes, DNA is highly compacted within the nucleus into a structure known as chromatin. Modulation of chromatin structure allows for precise regulation of gene expression, and thereby controls cell fate decisions. Specific chromatin organization is established and preserved by numerous factors to generate desired cellular outcomes. In embryonic stem (ES) cells, chromatin is precisely regulated to preserve their two defining characteristics: self-renewal and pluripotent state. This action is accomplished by a litany of nucleosome remodelers, histone variants, epigenetic marks, and other chromatin regulatory factors. These highly dynamic regulatory factors come together to precisely define a chromatin state that is conducive to ES cell maintenance and development, where dysregulation threatens the survival and fitness of the developing organism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C Klein
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Sarah J Hainer
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hernandez C, Wang Z, Ramazanov B, Tang Y, Mehta S, Dambrot C, Lee YW, Tessema K, Kumar I, Astudillo M, Neubert TA, Guo S, Ivanova NB. Dppa2/4 Facilitate Epigenetic Remodeling during Reprogramming to Pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 2018; 23:396-411.e8. [PMID: 30146411 PMCID: PMC6128737 DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2017] [Revised: 06/04/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
As somatic cells are converted into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), their chromatin is remodeled to a pluripotent configuration with unique euchromatin-to-heterochromatin ratios, DNA methylation patterns, and enhancer and promoter status. The molecular machinery underlying this process is largely unknown. Here, we show that embryonic stem cell (ESC)-specific factors Dppa2 and Dppa4 play a key role in resetting the epigenome to a pluripotent state. They are induced in reprogramming intermediates, function as a heterodimer, and are required for efficient reprogramming of mouse and human cells. When co-expressed with Oct4, Klf4, Sox2, and Myc (OKSM) factors, Dppa2/4 yield reprogramming efficiencies that exceed 80% and accelerate reprogramming kinetics, generating iPSCs in 2 to 4 days. When bound to chromatin, Dppa2/4 initiate global chromatin decompaction via the DNA damage response pathway and contribute to downregulation of somatic genes and activation of ESC enhancers, all of which enables an efficient transition to pluripotency. Our work provides critical insights into how the epigenome is remodeled during acquisition of pluripotency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Hernandez
- Department of Genetics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Stem Cell Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Zheng Wang
- Department of Genetics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Stem Cell Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Bulat Ramazanov
- Department of Genetics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Stem Cell Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Yin Tang
- Department of Genetics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Sameet Mehta
- Department of Genetics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Center for Genome Analysis, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Cheryl Dambrot
- Department of Genetics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Stem Cell Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Yu-Wei Lee
- Department of Genetics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Stem Cell Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kaleab Tessema
- Department of Genetics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Stem Cell Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Ishan Kumar
- Department of Genetics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Stem Cell Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Michael Astudillo
- Department of Genetics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Stem Cell Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Thomas A Neubert
- Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine at the Skirball Institute and Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shangqin Guo
- Yale Stem Cell Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Cell Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Natalia B Ivanova
- Department of Genetics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Stem Cell Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|