Hydroxycut-related Vanishing Bile Duct Syndrome

Review article: clinical assessment of suspected drug-induced liver injury and its management

BACKGROUND

Idisyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare instance of liver injury after exposure to an otherwise safe drug or herbal or dietary supplement. DILI can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, it is an important consideration in drug development due to safety concerns.

AIMS AND METHODS

To highlight pearls and pitfalls to aid clinicians in diagnosing DILI and surmising the management options. We also share the best practices from personal insights developed from decades long participation in the causality assessment committee meetings of the DILI Network.

RESULTS

DILI lacks a diagnostic test and is currently diagnosed through a process of exclusion of competing aetiologies of liver injury. This requires a high degree of suspicion to consider the possibility of DILI, skill in ruling out the obvious and less obvious competing liver insults, and an understanding of the expected phenotypes of DILI. The facets of DILI cover multiple aspects, including the latency, liver injury pattern, course of injury, and associated autoimmune or immuno-allergic features. Care for patients with DILI is geared towards stopping the offending drug and symptom management that include the use of corticosteroids in select cases.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of DILI is challenging and is primarily made through a carefully crafted patient interview, temporal relationship with the implicated drug or supplement, and exclusion of competing aetiology. LiverTox is a useful resource for clinicians to review the literature and recognise the likelihood of the implicated agent in causing DILI.

Vanishing bile duct syndrome after drug-induced liver injury

BACKGROUND

Vanishing bile duct syndrome (VBDS) is a serious cholestatic liver disease that can be a complication of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). While journals have published case reports of this condition, large studies on a cohort of these patients are lacking. We aimed to compile published case reports and case series of patients with VBDS and DILI to describe the clinical and laboratory characteristics of the disease and identify factors associated with good and poor outcomes.

METHODS

We included case reports and case series of VBDS secondary only to DILI. We extracted demographic, clinical, laboratory, treatment, and exposure data from each case report and categorized cases by outcome, good versus poor. We defined poor outcomes as cases with severe long-term complications or death. We analyzed risk factors for poor outcomes using logistic regression.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 59 eligible cases. Of those, 39 (59%) were female, the median age was 36 (IQR:12-58), and 18 (31%) were pediatric cases (≤18 years). The most common offending drug class was antibiotics, especially beta-lactams. Patients with increased total bilirubin (OR=4.69; 95% CI=1.55-15.49; p = 0.008), increased direct bilirubin (OR=6.50; 95% CI=1.34-48.91; p = 0.034), lower liver synthetic activity (OR=0.11; 95% CI=0.02-0.55; p = 0.013), and older age (OR=3.31; 95% CI=1.15-10.04; p = 0.029) were more likely to develop poor outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with VBDS and DILI, antibiotics were the most common offending agents. Higher total and direct bilirubin levels were associated with poor outcomes.

Hepatotoxicity due to herbal dietary supplements: Past, present and the future

Dietary supplements (DS) constitute a widely used group of products comprising vitamin, mineral, and botanical extract formulations. DS of botanical or herbal origins (HDS) comprise nearly 30% of all DS and are presented on the market either as single plant extracts or multi-extract-containing products. Despite generally safe toxicological profiles of most products currently present on the market, rising cases of liver injury caused by HDS - mostly by multi-ingredient and adulterated products - are of particular concern. Here we discuss the most prominent historical cases of HDS-induced hepatotoxicty - from Ephedra to Hydroxycut and OxyELITE Pro-NF, as well as products with suspected hepatotoxicity that are either currently on or are entering the market. We further provide discussion on overcoming the existing challenges with HDS-linked hepatotoxicity by introduction of advanced in silico, in vitro, in vivo, and microphysiological system approaches to address the matter of safety of those products before they reach the market.

Herb-drug Interactions in Neuropsychiatric Pharmacotherapy - A Review of Clinically Relevant Findings

The management of neuropsychiatric disorders relies heavily on pharmacotherapy. The use of herbal products as complimentary medicine, often concomitantly, is common among patients taking prescription neuropsychiatric drugs. Herb-drug interaction, a clinical consequence of this practice, may jeopardize the success of pharmacotherapy in neuropsychiatry. Besides the wellknown ability of phytochemicals to inhibit and/or induce drug-metabolizing enzymes and transport proteins, several phytoconstituents are capable of exerting pharmacological effects on the central nervous system. This study reviewed the relevant literature and identified 13 commonly used herbal products - celery, echinacea, ginkgo, ginseng, hydroxycut, kava, kratom, moringa, piperine, rhodiola, St. John's wort, terminalia/commiphora ayurvedic mixture and valerian - which have shown clinically relevant interactions with prescription drugs used in the management of neuropsychiatric disorders. The consequent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions with orthodox medications often result in deleterious clinical consequences. This underscores the importance of caution in herb-drug co-medication.

Finding the bad actor: Challenges in identifying toxic constituents in botanical dietary supplements

Botanical-derived dietary supplements have widespread use in the general population. The complex and variable nature of botanical ingredients and reports of adverse responses have led to concern for negative human health impacts following consumption of these products. Toxicity testing of the vast number of available products, formulations, and combinations is not feasible due to the time and resource intensive nature of comprehensive testing. Methods are needed to assess the safety of a large number of products via more efficient frameworks. Identification of toxicologically-active constituents is one approach being used, with many advantages toward product regulation. Bioassay-guided fractionation (BGF) is the leading approach used to identify biologically-active constituents. Most BGF studies with botanicals focus on identifying pharmacologically-active constituents for drug discovery or botanical efficacy research. Here, we explore BGF in a toxicological context, drawing from both efficacy and poisonous plant research. Limitations of BGF, including loss of mixture activity and bias toward abundant constituents, and recent advancements in the field (e.g., biochemometrics) are discussed from a toxicological perspective. Identification of active constituents will allow better monitoring of market products for known toxicologically-active constituents, as well as surveying human exposure, two important steps to ensuring the safety of botanical dietary supplements.