Drug-Induced Autoimmune Hepatitis: Response to Corticosteroids and Lack of Relapse After Cessation of Steroids

[Drug-induced autoimmune-like liver injury]

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare yet potentially life-threatening disease. Besides intrinsic DILI, which is mainly caused by paracetamol overdosing and which is dose-dependent and predictable, there is idiosyncratic DILI-an unpredictable and dose-independent injury of the liver caused by certain medications that only occurs in a minority of patients taking this drug. The reason why some patients react with DILI towards a specific drug is still unknown. However, the immune system plays a central role, which is underlined by the association of certain human leukocyte antigen (HLA) polymorphisms and DILI caused by specific drug classes. Due to the immunological processes that lead to the liver injury in DILI, there are great overlaps regarding laboratory and histological parameters between DILI and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Differentiating DILI and AIH can therefore be challenging, especially at the time of presentation. In addition, there are other immunologically mediated DILI phenotypes, in particular the newly defined drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-ALH) and liver injuries caused by checkpoint inhibitors (CPI). DI-ALH is characterized by autoimmune features and good responses towards corticosteroids, with the difference that DI-ALH mostly does not relapse after discontinuation of corticosteroids. CPI-induced liver injury has become more frequent with the rising use of those drugs and is characterized by a distinct histopathological pattern with granulomatous hepatitis and infiltration dominated by cytotoxic T cells. Similarly, the recently recognized liver injury following vaccinations also shows an autoimmune phenotype; however, in contrast to AIH, cytotoxic T cells seem to dominate the inflammatory infiltrates in the liver.

Chinese guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury: an update

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an important adverse drug reaction that can lead to acute liver failure or even death in severe cases. Currently, the diagnosis of DILI still follows the strategy of exclusion. Therefore, a detailed history taking and a thorough and careful exclusion of other potential causes of liver injury is the key to correct diagnosis. This guideline was developed based on evidence-based medicine provided by the latest research advances and aims to provide professional guidance to clinicians on how to identify suspected DILI timely and standardize the diagnosis and management in clinical practice. Based on the clinical settings in China, the guideline also specifically focused on DILI in chronic liver disease, drug-induced viral hepatitis reactivation, common causing agents of DILI (herbal and dietary supplements, anti-tuberculosis drugs, and antineoplastic drugs), and signal of DILI in clinical trials and its assessment.

Roadmap to DILI research in Europe. A proposal from COST action ProEuroDILINet

In the current article the aims for a constructive way forward in Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) are to highlight the most important priorities in research and clinical science, therefore supporting a more informed, focused, and better funded future for European DILI research. This Roadmap aims to identify key challenges, define a shared vision across all stakeholders for the opportunities to overcome these challenges and propose a high-quality research program to achieve progress on the prediction, prevention, diagnosis and management of this condition and impact on healthcare practice in the field of DILI. This will involve 1. Creation of a database encompassing optimised case report form for prospectively identified DILI cases with well-characterised controls with competing diagnoses, biological samples, and imaging data; 2. Establishing of preclinical models to improve the assessment and prediction of hepatotoxicity in humans to guide future drug safety testing; 3. Emphasis on implementation science and 4. Enhanced collaboration between drug-developers, clinicians and regulatory scientists. This proposed operational framework will advance DILI research and may bring together basic, applied, translational and clinical research in DILI.

A Case Report: Idiopathic or Drug-Induced Autoimmune Hepatitis-Can We Draw a Line?

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an unpredictable reaction of individuals exposed to a certain drug, and drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DIAIH) presents a DILI phenotype that mimics idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) when considering the clinical, biochemical, serological and histological parameters. We present a case report of a 48-year-old male who was hospitalized due to severe hepatocellular liver injury two months after self-treatment with a muscle-building dietary supplement based on arginine-alpha-ketoglutarate, L-citrulline, L tyrosine, creatine malate and beet extract. His immunology panel was positive with increased IgG levels, and radiologic methods showed no signs of chronic liver disease. He underwent corticosteroid treatment with adequate response. After therapy withdrawal, a clinical relapse occurred. Seven months after the initial presentation, liver MR suggested initial cirrhotic changes in the right liver lobe. A liver biopsy revealed abundant lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate with piecemeal necrosis and grade 2 fibrosis. He responded well to the corticosteroid treatment again, and was further treated with low-dose prednisone without additional relapses. Several years later, further management confirmed the presence of liver cirrhosis with no histological or biochemical signs of disease activity. DIAIH is a DILI phenotype that is difficult to distinguish from idiopathic AIH despite a wide armamentarium of diagnostic methods. It should always be considered among the differential diagnoses in patients presenting with hepatocellular liver injury.

Nomenclature, diagnosis and management of drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-ALH): An expert opinion meeting report

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) can mimic almost all other liver disorders. A phenotype increasingly ascribed to drugs is autoimmune-like hepatitis (ALH). This article summarises the major topics discussed at a joint International Conference held between the Drug-Induced Liver Injury consortium and the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. DI-ALH is a liver injury with laboratory and/or histological features that may be indistinguishable from those of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Previous studies have revealed that patients with DI-ALH and those with idiopathic AIH have very similar clinical, biochemical, immunological and histological features. Differentiating DI-ALH from AIH is important as patients with DI-ALH rarely require long-term immunosuppression and the condition often resolves spontaneously after withdrawal of the implicated drug, whereas patients with AIH mostly require long-term immunosuppression. Therefore, revision of the diagnosis on long-term follow-up may be necessary in some cases. More than 40 different drugs including nitrofurantoin, methyldopa, hydralazine, minocycline, infliximab, herbal and dietary supplements (such as Khat and Tinospora cordifolia) have been implicated in DI-ALH. Understanding of DI-ALH is limited by the lack of specific markers of the disease that could allow for a precise diagnosis, while there is similarly no single feature which is diagnostic of AIH. We propose a management algorithm for patients with liver injury and an autoimmune phenotype. There is an urgent need to prospectively evaluate patients with DI-ALH systematically to enable definitive characterisation of this condition.

Clinical presentation, causative drugs and outcome of patients with autoimmune features in two prospective DILI registries

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) with autoimmune features is a liver condition with laboratory and histological characteristics similar to those of idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), which despite being increasingly reported, remains largely undefined. We aimed to describe in-depth the features of this entity in a large series of patients from two prospective DILI registries.

METHODS

DILI cases with autoimmune features collected in the Spanish DILI Registry and the Latin American DILI Network were compared with DILI patients without autoimmune features and with an independent cohort of patients with AIH.

RESULTS

Out of 1,426 patients with DILI, 33 cases with autoimmune features were identified. Female sex was more frequent in AIH patients than in the other groups (p = .001). DILI cases with autoimmune features had significantly longer time to onset (p < .001) and resolution time (p = .004) than those without autoimmune features. Interestingly, DILI patients with autoimmune features who relapsed exhibited significantly higher total bilirubin and transaminases at onset and absence of peripheral eosinophilia than those who did not relapse. The likelihood of relapse increased over time, from 17% at 6 months to 50% 4 years after biochemical normalization. Statins, nitrofurantoin and minocycline were the drugs most frequently associated with this phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

DILI with autoimmune features shows different clinical features than DILI patients lacking characteristics of autoimmunity. Higher transaminases and total bilirubin values with no eosinophilia at presentation increase the likelihood of relapse in DILI with autoimmune features. As the tendency to relapse increases over time, these patients will require long-term follow-up.

Acute Liver Failure Guidelines

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a rare, acute, potentially reversible condition resulting in severe liver impairment and rapid clinical deterioration in patients without preexisting liver disease. Due to the rarity of this condition, published studies are limited by the use of retrospective or prospective cohorts and lack of randomized controlled trials. Current guidelines represent the suggested approach to the identification, treatment, and management of ALF and represent the official practice recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. The scientific evidence was reviewed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation process to develop recommendations. When no robust evidence was available, expert opinions were summarized using Key Concepts. Considering the variety of clinical presentations of ALF, individualization of care should be applied in specific clinical scenarios.

Levetiracetam Liver Injury: A Benign Antiepileptic Agent?

Levetiracetam is a commonly prescribed antiepileptic agent and has rarely been linked to hepatotoxicity. This case describes a patient with drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis secondary to levetiracetam.

Diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis is an inflammatory disease of the liver of unknown cause that may progress to liver cirrhosis and end stage liver failure if diagnosis is overlooked and treatment delayed. The clinical presentation is often that of acute hepatitis, sometimes very severe; less frequently, it can be insidious or completely asymptomatic. The disease can affect people of any age and is more common in women; its incidence and prevalence seem to be on the rise worldwide. An abnormal immune response targeting liver autoantigens and inducing persistent and self-perpetuating liver inflammation is the pathogenic mechanism of the disease. A specific set of autoantibodies, increased IgG concentrations, and histological demonstration of interface hepatitis and periportal necrosis are the diagnostic hallmarks of autoimmune hepatitis. Prompt response to treatment with corticosteroids and other immunomodulatory drugs is almost universal and supports the diagnosis. The aims of treatment are to induce and maintain long term remission of liver inflammation. Treatment can often even reverse liver fibrosis, thus preventing progression to advanced cirrhosis and its complications. Most patients need lifelong maintenance therapy, and repeated follow-up in experienced hands improves the quality of care and quality of life for affected patients.

Liver injury after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: Features of immune-mediated hepatitis, role of corticosteroid therapy and outcome

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A few case reports of autoimmune hepatitis-like liver injury have been reported after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. We evaluated clinical features, treatment response and outcomes of liver injury following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in a large case series.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

We collected data from cases in 18 countries. The type of liver injury was assessed with the R-value. The study population was categorized according to features of immune-mediated hepatitis (positive autoantibodies and elevated immunoglobulin G levels) and corticosteroid therapy for the liver injury. We identified 87 patients (63%, female), median age 48 (range: 18-79) years at presentation. Liver injury was diagnosed a median 15 (range: 3-65) days after vaccination. Fifty-one cases (59%) were attributed to the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine, 20 (23%) cases to the Oxford-AstraZeneca (ChAdOX1 nCoV-19) vaccine and 16 (18%) cases to the Moderna (mRNA-1273) vaccine. The liver injury was predominantly hepatocellular (84%) and 57% of patients showed features of immune-mediated hepatitis. Corticosteroids were given to 46 (53%) patients, more often for grade 3-4 liver injury than for grade 1-2 liver injury (88.9% vs. 43.5%, p = 0.001) and more often for patients with than without immune-mediated hepatitis (71.1% vs. 38.2%, p = 0.003). All patients showed resolution of liver injury except for one man (1.1%) who developed liver failure and underwent liver transplantation. Steroid therapy was withdrawn during the observation period in 12 (26%) patients after complete biochemical resolution. None had a relapse during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination can be associated with liver injury. Corticosteroid therapy may be beneficial in those with immune-mediated features or severe hepatitis. Outcome was generally favorable, but vaccine-associated liver injury led to fulminant liver failure in one patient.

Setting up criteria for drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis through a systematic analysis of published reports

Nitrofurantoin, minocycline, methyldopa and infliximab, have been found to induce autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-AILH). Evidence for other drugs and herbal and dietary supplements (HDS) is unclear. The aims of the study were to establish criteria to define and review the published evidence of suspected DI-AILH. Search was undertaken in Pubmed using search terms "drug-induced liver injury," "autoimmune hepatitis," and "drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis." DI-AILH was defined as (1) drug as a potential trigger of liver injury with autoimmune features and histological findings compatible with AIH; (2) no or incomplete recovery or worsening of liver tests after discontinuation of the drug; (3) corticosteroids requirement or spontaneous recovery; (4) follow-up without immunosuppression (IS) and no relapse of AIH at least 6 months after discontinuation of IS; and (5) drugs potentially inducing AILH with a chronic course. Cases fulfilling the first four criteria were considered probable DI-AILH with three possible DI-AILH. A total of 186 case reports were identified for conventional drugs (n = 148; females 79%; latency 2.6 months) and HDS (n = 38; females 50%). The most commonly reported agents of DI-AILH were interferons (n = 37), statins (n = 24), methylprednisolone (MPS) (n = 16), adalimumab (n = 10), imatinib (n = 8), and diclofenac (n = 7). Tinospora cordifolia and Khat were the only HDS with probable DI-AILH cases. No relapses of AIH were observed when IS was stopped after interferons, imatinib, diclofenac, and methylprednisolone. Conclusion: Beyond well-recognized nitrofurantoin, methyldopa, hydralazine, minocycline, and infliximab as causes of DI-AILH, interferons, imatinib, adalimumab, and MPS were the best-documented agents leading to probable DI-AILH. Khat and Tinospora cordifolia were the only HDS found to be able to induce DI-AILH. Long-term immunosuppression appears to be rarely required in patients with DI-AILH due to these drugs.

Efficacy and safety of bicyclol for treating patients with idiosyncratic acute drug-induced liver injury: A multicenter, randomized, phase II trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Evidence for using bicyclol in drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is limited. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of bicyclol in acute DILI.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, double-dummy, active-controlled, superiority and phase II trial. Patients with idiosyncratic acute DILI were randomized 1: 1:1 to low-dose bicyclol (25 mg times a day [TID]), high-dose bicyclol (50 mg TID) and polyene phosphatidylcholine (control) groups. The primary endpoint was the decrease from baseline in serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels at post-treatment for 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Overall, 241 patients were included in the full analysis set, with 81, 82 and 78 patients in the low-dose bicyclol, high-dose bicyclol, and control groups respectively. ALT levels decreased across groups (-249.2 ± 151.1, -273.6 ± 203.1, and -180.8 ± 218.2 U/L in the low-dose bicyclol, high-dose bicyclol and control groups, respectively; both p < .001, the bicyclol-dependent groups vs. control group). The ALT normalization rates at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 were higher in the bicyclol-dependent groups than in the control group (p = .002 at week 1 and all p < .001 at weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8 respectively). The median times to ALT normalization in the low-dose bicyclol, high-dose bicyclol and control groups were 29, 16 and 43 days respectively. Adverse events, serious adverse events and adverse drug reactions were similar across groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Bicyclol (25 and 50 mg TID) appeared efficacious and safe for treating idiosyncratic acute DILI, while bicyclol 50 mg TID showed higher efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov (registration no. NCT02944552).

Diagnostic value of a liver biopsy in patients with an acute liver failure or acute liver injury

OBJECTIVES

The diagnostic value of liver biopsy in patients with acute liver injury or acute liver failure (ALI/ALF) was investigated.

METHODS

Data from the initial event and follow-up visits were retrospectively analyzed in all patients with a liver biopsy during ALI/ALF from January 2010 to May 2020 at the University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 66 patients. Post-biopsy hemorrhage occurred in 2 of 66 but was self-limited. In five patients suspected liver involvement by a systemic extrahepatic disease was confirmed and excluded in eight patients. In 4 of 66 patients, the etiology of ALI/ALF remained unknown. Liver biopsy hinted at the etiology of ALI/ALF in 2 of 6 patients with rare diagnoses (hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: 2 of 66; ischemic liver injury: 1 of 66, ALI/ALF due to a systemic infection: 3 of 66). In 31 of 34 patients with drug-induced liver injury (DILI), histopathology suggested DILI; in further 2 patients, DILI was among the differential diagnoses. However, DILI was also the histopathologically preferred diagnosis in 12 of 15 patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Only in 3 of 15 patients, histopathology was considered compatible with AIH. Serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and autoantibodies during ALI/ALF were higher in patients with AIH than with DILI. Patients with AIH did not show a more pronounced biochemical response to corticosteroids in the first 10 days of treatment than patients with DILI.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver biopsy is indispensable when liver involvement by an extrahepatic disease is suspected. To distinguish AIH from DILI in ALI/ALF, serum IgG, and autoantibodies seem more helpful than liver biopsy; long-term follow-up is needed in these patients.

Gender and Autoimmune Liver Diseases: Relevant Aspects in Clinical Practice

Autoimmune liver diseases (AILDs) include autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cholangitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. The etiologies of AILD are not well understood but appear to involve a combination of genetic and environmental factors. AILDs commonly affect young individuals and are characterized by a highly variable clinical course. These diseases significantly influence quality of life and can progress toward liver decompensation or the onset of hepatocellular or cholangiocarcinoma; a significant number of patients eventually progress to end-stage liver disease, requiring liver transplantation. In this review, we focus on the sex characteristics and peculiarities of AILD patients and highlight the relevance of a sex-specific analysis in future studies. Understanding the sex differences underlying AILD immune dysregulation may be critical for developing more effective treatments.

Challenges and Future of Drug-Induced Liver Injury Research-Laboratory Tests

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare but potentially severe adverse drug event, which is also a major cause of study cessation and market withdrawal during drug development. Since no acknowledged diagnostic tests are available, DILI diagnosis poses a major challenge both in clinical practice as well as in pharmacovigilance. Differentiation from other liver diseases and the identification of the causative agent in the case of polymedication are the main issues that clinicians and drug developers face in this regard. Thus, efforts have been made to establish diagnostic testing methods and biomarkers in order to safely diagnose DILI and ensure a distinguishment from alternative liver pathologies. This review provides an overview of the diagnostic methods used in differential diagnosis, especially with regards to autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DI-AIH), in vitro causality methods using individual blood samples, biomarkers for diagnosis and severity prediction, as well as experimental predictive models utilized in pre-clinical settings during drug development regimes.

Glucocorticoid Treatment Strategies in Liver Failure

Liver failure is characterized by serious liver decompensation and high mortality. The activation of systemic immune responses and systemic inflammation are widely accepted as the core pathogenesis of liver failure. Glucocorticoids (GCs) are most regularly utilized to suppress excessive inflammatory reactions and immunological responses. GCs have been used in the clinical treatment of liver failure for nearly 60 years. While there has been no unanimity on the feasibility and application of GC treatment in liver failure until recently. The most recent trials have produced conflicting results when it comes to the dose and time for GC therapy of different etiology of liver failure. Our review outlines the issues and options in managing GC treatment in liver failure based on an investigation of the molecular mechanism that GC may give in the treatment.

Acute liver injury following methylprednisolone pulse therapy: 13 cases from a prospectively collected cohort

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains a challenging diagnosis requiring exclusion of other causes of liver injury, concise medical history taking to identify potential causative medication and creation of a plausible temporal relation to attribute said liver injury to a potentially hepatotoxic agent. In spite of corticosteroids being considered an effective treatment for DILI in some patients, methylprednisolone (MPS) has been associated with liver injury of varying severity.

METHODS

We analyzed data of our prospective study on potentially hepatotoxic drugs (NCT02353455), identified 13 cases of MPS-associated liver injury and performed an analysis of clinical, laboratory and histopathological characteristics. For all available liver biopsy specimens, expert histopathological analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients with a variety of primarily neurologic autoimmune diseases treated with MPS developed subsequent liver injury with a median latency of 5 weeks. Liver injury was severe or required transplantation in six patients. Injury typically occurred after repeated pulsing was hepatocellular and responded swiftly to prednisolone administration. For those patients who received in house-follow up, relapse after discontinuation of immunosuppression was not observed. Histopathological features of MPS-DILI comprised both interface and periportal hepatitis with mixed inflammatory infiltrates, similar to autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) features.

DISCUSSION

MPS-related liver injury can be life-threatening, occurs with considerable latency and after repeat dosing. Regular surveillance of hepatic biochemistry should therefore be routinely performed also after discharge to avoid further MPS-related liver injury during repeat application. Swift response to prednisolone but not histologic features can be helpful to discriminate MPS-DILI from AIH.

Drug-induced liver injury: Pathogenesis, epidemiology, clinical features, and practical management

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an important but rare adverse event which can range from mild liver enzyme elevations to liver failure, transplantation or death. A large proportion of commonly used medications, in addition to herbal and dietary supplements, can cause liver injury. DILI has been categorized as direct or idiosyncratic but indirect liver injury has emerged as a third type of drug-induced liver injury. These types of liver injury may warrant different clinical approach and treatment. Associations of HLA genotypes and risk of DILI have highlighted the importance of the immune system in the pathogenesis of DILI. Furthermore, novel agents affecting the immune response can lead to liver injury, often associated with autoimmune features in serologic tests and liver biopsies. Overall, the diagnosis of DILI remains a challenge as it is requires detailed case evaluation in addition to reviewing the hepatotoxic potentials and clinical signatures of the implicated agents. Biochemical profiles vary between agents and although individual drugs tend to portray a consistent clinicopathologic signature, many drugs have multiple signatures. Thanks to multicenter prospective studies on DILI and websites in the public domain such as LiverTox, physicians are provided with tools to investigate suspected DILI cases to increase the likelihood of establishing adiagnosis. The pathogenesis of DILI, epidemiology and current challenges in the diagnosis and management of the disease are reviewed in the paper.

Role of Corticosteroids in Drug-Induced Liver Injury. A Systematic Review

Introduction: Apart from cessation of the implicated agent leading to drug-induced liver injury (DILI), there is no standard therapy for DILI. Corticosteroids have been used in DILI, although their efficacy is unclear. Published data showed either beneficial effects or no improvement associated with steroid therapy. The aim of the current study was to perform a systematic review of the role of corticosteroids in the treatment of DILI.

Methods: A search was performed in PubMed, searching for the terms: “corticosteroids” and “drug-induced liver injury”. Observation studies were included, but case reports excluded.

Results: A total of 24 papers were retrieved. Most of these were observational studies on the effects of corticosteroids in moderate/severe DILI (n = 8), reports on the corticosteroid treatment in patients with drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DI-AIH) (n = 5), and effects of corticosteroids in drug-induced fulminant acute liver failure (ALF, n = 2). Furthermore, treatment of corticosteroids in patients with liver injury due to check point inhibitors (CPIs) was addressed in nine studies. In moderate/severe DILI, six out of eight studies suggested steroid treatment to be beneficial, whereas two studies showed negative results. All five observational studies on the effects of corticosteroids in DI-AIH showed good therapeutic response with rapid and long lasting effects after discontinuation of corticosteroids and without evidence of relapse. Steroid therapy was not associated with improved overall survival in patients with drug-induced fulminant ALF. CPIs-induced liver injury was found to improve spontaneously in 33–50% without corticosteroids, and the rate of patients who were treated responded to steroids in 33–100% (mean 72%).

Conclusions: The majority of studies analyzing the effects of corticosteroids in moderate/severe DILI have demonstrated beneficial effects. However, this was not the case in drug-induced fulminant ALF. Patients with DI-AIH had an excellent response to corticosteroids. The majority of those with CPIs-induced liver injury responded to corticosteroids; however, patients without treatment usually recovered spontaneously. The observational design and comparison with historical controls in these studies makes it very difficult to draw conclusions on the efficacy of corticosteroids in DILI. Therefore, there is a strong need for a randomized controlled trial to properly assess the role of corticosteroids in DILI.

Graves' disease overlapping with chronic hepatitis B and methimazole-induced liver injury and autoimmune hepatitis: a case report

Background

Liver injury related to Graves’ Disease (GD) includes hepatotoxicity of thyroid hormone excess, drug-induced liver injury, and changes resulting from concomitant liver disease. Methimazole (MMI) has been shown to induce several patterns of liver injury. However, the diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) overlapping with either GD or chronic hepatitis B are challenging.

Case presentation

A 35-year-old man from China presented with a two-year history of GD and a 10-day history of progressive jaundice. He had taken MMI for two months and discontinuing treatment due to liver toxicity 1 year ago and for another 6 days 20 days prior to hospitalization. The patient was diagnosed with GD overlapping with chronic hepatitis B and MMI-induced liver injury with early stage of acute-on-chronic liver failure on admission. However, the elevated aminotransferase and bilirubin levels could not be controlled after correction of liver failure and effective control of HBV replication and hyperthyroidism by daily oral entecavir and one-time oral administration of 131-iodine. The patient underwent liver biopsy on the 43rd day of hospitalization, showing HBsAg expression on the membrane of hepatocytes and typical histopathological characteristics of AIH. He was finally diagnosed with GD overlapping with chronic hepatitis B and MMI-induced liver injury and AIH. The elevated aminotransferase and bilirubin completely returned to normal by 3-month glucocorticoid therapy and continuous entecavir treatment and there was no recurrence during a 6-month follow-up, suggesting that AIH in this patient is different from classical AIH or GD-associated AIH.

Conclusions

GD together with AIH is a complex and difficult subject. It needs to be clarified whether MMI or HBV can act as a trigger for AIH in this patient.

Long-term sequelae of drug-induced liver injury

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has a very variable clinical and biochemical phenotype and differs widely in severity, from mild injury to life-threatening liver failure. Chronic injury has also been reported to occur at a variable frequency, ranging from 3.4% to 39%, 6-12 months after discontinuing the implicated agent. This wide range is probably related to various definitions of chronic liver injury and variable selection of patients. The long-term sequalae of this chronic injury in terms of morbidity and mortality are unclear, although rare vanishing bile duct syndrome is associated with an unfavourable prognosis, with increased risk of chronic liver failure and need for liver transplantation. Other forms of long-term sequalae associated with DILI are progressive fibrosis, autoimmune-like hepatitis, secondary sclerosing cholangitis, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and, as a common final stage, the development of cirrhosis, portal hypertension and its complications. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, which can cause an autoimmune-like phenotype have also recently been shown to cause sclerosing cholangitis with cytotoxic T CD8+ cell infiltration in biliary tracts. DILI has been shown to have a significant impact on health-related quality of life but very little is known about its psychological consequences in the long-term. Further investigations with structured long-term follow-up and periodic quality of life surveys are needed to assess the impact of DILI on psychological outcomes, particularly in those with chronic sequelae.

Infliximab-induced liver injury: Clinical phenotypes, autoimmunity and the role of corticosteroid treatment

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Infliximab has been associated with drug-induced liver injury (DILI), particularly drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DIAIH). DIAIH is commonly treated with corticosteroids, but there is limited data on the efficacy of corticosteroids in infliximab-induced DILI.

METHODS

Patients were included for assessment if they had been treated with infliximab between 2009-2020 in Iceland and had developed elevated liver tests. Other specific etiologies of liver enzyme elevations were excluded. Patients treated with corticosteroids were compared to patients not receiving corticosteroids.

RESULTS

A total of 36 patients with infliximab-induced DILI were identified: median age was 46 years (IQR 32-54) and 28 (78%) were female. Type of liver injury was predominantly hepatocellular (64%). Median peak liver enzymes were: alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 393 (328-695) U/L, aspartate aminotransferase 283 (158-564) U/L, alkaline phosphatase 116 (83-205) U/L, and bilirubin (10-20) 13 μmol/L. A total of 25 (69%) were positive for anti-nuclear antibody and/or had elevated IgG. Corticosteroids were initiated in 17 (47%). Median time from onset of liver injury to peak ALT value was longer in patients treated with corticosteroids, 22 (12-59) vs. 0 (0-3) days (p = 0.001). Time from peak ALT to normalization of liver enzymes was 45 days in the corticosteroid group vs. 77 days in others (p = 0.062). Corticosteroids were tapered in all patients, with no cases of relapse during the follow-up period of 1,245 (820-2,698) days. Overall 75% received another biologic, mostly adalimumab, without evidence of liver injury.

CONCLUSION

Approximately half of patients with infliximab-induced liver injury had slow improvement in ALT despite cessation of therapy and were treated with corticosteroids. Treatment response was good with prompt resolution of liver test abnormalities. Relapse of liver injury was not observed after tapering of corticosteroids despite prolonged follow-up and no patients developed DILI due to a second biologic.

LAY SUMMARY

A rare side effect of infliximab, a biologic medicine used to treat multiple inflammatory diseases, is liver injury and liver inflammation. Steroid treatment has been used in some patients with liver injury caused by infliximab, but there have been few studies supporting this treatment. In this study of 36 patients with infliximab-induced liver injury, approximately half of patients were treated with steroids and the results suggest that patients receiving steroids recover more quickly.

Environmental risk factors are associated with autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Failure of immunologic homeostasis and resultant hepatocyte destruction in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is likely the result of environmental triggers within a permissive genetic architecture.

AIMS

We aimed to identify risk factors associated with AIH in a well-phenotyped AIH cohort.

METHODS

We prospectively collected environmental questionnaires from 358 AIH cases and 563 healthy controls. Response frequencies were compared using logistic regression, adjusting for age at recruitment, sex and education.

RESULTS

AIH cases were more likely to ever have a urinary tract infection (UTI) (53.6% vs 33.9%, P < .001) and recurrent UTI (more than 1 per year) (23.5% vs 15.9%, P = .002) compared to controls. Female cases more frequently had ever used oral contraceptives (83.0% vs 73.7%, P = .006), fewer pregnancies (median = 1 vs 3, P < .001) and less often used hormone replacement therapy compared to controls (28.5% vs 60.1%, P < .001). Current smoking was more prevalent in cases (18.9% vs 7.4%, P = .022), yet no difference according to historical smoking behaviours was observed. Finally, cases were less likely to have history of mumps (32.4% vs 53.1%, P = .011) and rheumatic fever (1.1% vs 4.4%, P = .028), but reported higher vaccination frequency to chicken pox (38% vs 28.1%), measles (66.5% vs 39.3%), mumps (58.7% vs 34.6%), rubella (55.3% vs 32.7%), pertussis (59.8% vs 40.1%) and pneumococcus (47.2% VS 39.4%) (P < .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Environmental factors are important in AIH pathogenesis. Replication of these findings and prospective examination may provide new insight into AIH onset and outcomes.

Clinical management of patients with drug-induced liver injury (DILI)

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) should be considered in all patients with recent elevation of liver tests without obvious etiology and normal hepatobiliary imaging. There is currently no biomarker that is helpful in diagnosis which relies on clinical and laboratory findings. Diagnosis is dependent on temporal relationship with a recently started drug or herbal and dietary supplement and elevated liver tests with exclusion of competing etiologies. The implicated agent should be discontinued and the patient should be observed closely. This is particularly important in patients with jaundice who have approximately 10% risk of liver related mortality and/or need for liver transplantation. There is no specific therapy for DILI which is only symptomatic such as for itching. Patients with jaundice and coagulopathy usually require hospitalization.

Comprehensive analysis and insights gained from long-term experience of the Spanish DILI Registry

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Prospective drug-induced liver injury (DILI) registries are important sources of information on idiosyncratic DILI. We aimed to present a comprehensive analysis of 843 patients with DILI enrolled into the Spanish DILI Registry over a 20-year time period.

METHODS

Cases were identified, diagnosed and followed prospectively. Clinical features, drug information and outcome data were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 843 patients, with a mean age of 54 years (48% females), were enrolled up to 2018. Hepatocellular injury was associated with younger age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] per year 0.983; 95% CI 0.974-0.991) and lower platelet count (aOR per unit 0.996; 95% CI 0.994-0.998). Anti-infectives were the most common causative drug class (40%). Liver-related mortality was more frequent in patients with hepatocellular damage aged ≥65 years (p = 0.0083) and in patients with underlying liver disease (p = 0.0221). Independent predictors of liver-related death/transplantation included nR-based hepatocellular injury, female sex, higher onset aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and bilirubin values. nR-based hepatocellular injury was not associated with 6-month overall mortality, for which comorbidity burden played a more important role. The prognostic capacity of Hy's law varied between causative agents. Empirical therapy (corticosteroids, ursodeoxycholic acid and MARS) was prescribed to 20% of patients. Drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis patients (26 cases) were mainly females (62%) with hepatocellular damage (92%), who more frequently received immunosuppressive therapy (58%).

CONCLUSIONS

AST elevation at onset is a strong predictor of poor outcome and should be routinely assessed in DILI evaluation. Mortality is higher in older patients with hepatocellular damage and patients with underlying hepatic conditions. The Spanish DILI Registry is a valuable tool in the identification of causative drugs, clinical signatures and prognostic risk factors in DILI and can aid physicians in DILI characterisation and management.

LAY SUMMARY

Clinical information on drug-induced liver injury (DILI) collected from enrolled patients in the Spanish DILI Registry can guide physicians in the decision-making process. We have found that older patients with hepatocellular type liver injury and patients with additional liver conditions are at a higher risk of mortality. The type of liver injury, patient sex and analytical values of aspartate aminotransferase and total bilirubin can also help predict clinical outcomes.

ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is common in gastroenterology and hepatology practices, and it can have multiple presentations, ranging from asymptomatic elevations in liver biochemistries to hepatocellular or cholestatic jaundice, liver failure, or chronic hepatitis. Antimicrobials, herbal and dietary supplements, and anticancer therapeutics (e.g., tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immune-checkpoint inhibitors) are the most common classes of agents to cause DILI in the Western world. DILI is a diagnosis of exclusion, and thus, careful assessment for other etiologies of liver disease should be undertaken before establishing a diagnosis of DILI. Model for end-stage liver disease score and comorbidity burden are important determinants of mortality in patients presenting with suspected DILI. DILI carries a mortality rate up to 10% when hepatocellular jaundice is present. Patients with DILI who develop progressive jaundice with or without coagulopathy should be referred to a tertiary care center for specialized care, including consideration for potential liver transplantation. The role of systemic corticosteroids is controversial, but they may be administered when a liver injury event cannot be distinguished between autoimmune hepatitis or DILI or when a DILI event presents with prominent autoimmune hepatitis features.

Drug induced liver injury: an update

Drug induced liver injury (DILI) is a relatively rare hepatic condition in response to the use of medications, illegal drugs, herbal products or dietary supplements. It occurs in susceptible individuals through a combination of genetic and environmental risk factors believed to modify drug metabolism and/or excretion leading to a cascade of cellular events, including oxidative stress formation, apoptosis/necrosis, haptenization, immune response activation and a failure to adapt. The resultant liver damage can present with an array of phenotypes, which mimic almost every other liver disorder, and varies in severity from asymptomatic elevation of liver tests to fulminant hepatic failure. Despite recent research efforts specific biomarkers are not still available for routine use in clinical practice, which makes the diagnosis of DILI uncertain and relying on a high degree of awareness of this condition and the exclusion of other causes of liver disease. Diagnostic scales such as the CIOMS/RUCAM can support the causality assessment of a DILI suspicion, but need refinement as some criteria are not evidence-based. Prospective collection of well-vetted DILI cases in established DILI registries has allowed the identification and validation of a number of clinical variables, and to predict a more severe DILI outcome. DILI is also in need of properly designed clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of new DILI treatments as well as older drugs such as ursodeoxycholic acid traditionally used to ameliorate cholestasis or corticosteroids now widely tried in the oncology field to manage the emergent type of hepatotoxicity related to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Liver injury caused by oral anticoagulants: A population-based retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare adverse event. DILI caused by direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has been reported, however, data on the risk of DILI are limited. The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency of DILI caused by oral anticoagulants (OACs) in a population-based setting.

METHODS

A computerized database search in The National Prescription Database was performed identifying all patients in Iceland who were prescribed OACs (rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban or warfarin) in 2008-2017. Personal identification numbers of these patients were linked with a database containing laboratory results for all hospitals and most outpatient clinics in Iceland. A medical chart review was performed in all cases where onset of liver injury followed intake of OACs. Patients with other specific causes of liver injury were excluded. Causality assessment with the RUCAM method was undertaken in cases with suspected DILI.

RESULTS

Three cases of suspected DILI were identified. In all cases, rivaroxaban was the implicated agent among patients prescribed this product (n = 3446). All were women with a hepatocellular type of liver injury. One patient developed a suspected drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis and was treated with corticosteroids. No cases of DILI in patients on warfarin (n = 9101), apixaban (n = 1903), dabigatran (n = 1335) and edoxaban (n = 34) were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Rivaroxaban was the only OAC associated with DILI during the 10-year study period. Approximately 1 in 1100 patients treated with rivaroxaban developed DILI. Other OACs were not associated with liver injury in this population-based study.

Metamizole: An underrated agent causing severe idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury

Aims

Drug‐induced liver injury (DILI) is a heterogenous entity leading to liver damage. We have analysed the frequency, biochemical and histological patterns and clinical courses of DILI cases due to metamizole at our tertiary care centre in Hamburg, Germany.

Methods

Consecutive patients with DILI who presented to our clinic were analysed retrospectively. Causes of acute hepatitis other than DILI were excluded.

Results

In total, 154 DILI cases were admitted to our centre from 2008 to 2017. After phenprocoumon, metamizole was the second most frequent putative agent causing DILI (23 of all 154 DILI cases, 14,9%). The biochemical pattern on admission of metamizole‐induced DILI cases was hepatocellular with median levels of alanine transaminase (779 U/L, 64–3532 U/L) by far exceeding median alkaline phosphatase levels (131 U/L, 42–578 U/L). In 17 of the 23 cases (74%) liver biopsy was performed. Moderate to severe inflammatory histological activity and severe centrilobular necrosis (>30%) was present in 76.5 and 35.3%, respectively. Metamizole was involved in 2 DILI cases progressing to acute liver failure, then receiving liver transplantation and still alive at time of assessment. Our data were supported by re‐exposure in 4 patients. Furthermore, a database search for metamizole‐induced liver injury in the European Medicines Agency's database identified about 300 reports on suspected metamizole‐induced DILI in Europe.

Conclusion

Elevation of liver enzymes or acute liver failure are not mentioned in the German drug label of metamizole as potential side effects. Our study reveals that in Germany and Europe, metamizole is a frequent and underrated agent causing DILI.

HLA associations with infliximab-induced liver injury

Biomarkers that are able to identify patients at risk of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) after treatment with infliximab could be important in increasing the safety of infliximab use. We performed a genetic analysis to identify possible human leukocyte antigen (HLA) associations with DILI in European Caucasian users of infliximab in a retrospective study of 16 infliximab-DILI patients and 60 matched controls. In infliximab-associated liver injury, multiple potentially causal individual HLA associations were observed, as well as possible haplotypes. The strongest associated HLA allele was HLA-B*39:01 (P = 0.001; odds ratio [OR] 43.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8-infinity), which always appeared with another associated allele C*12:03 (P = 0.032; OR 6.1; 95% CI 0.9-47.4). Other associations were observed with HLAs DQB1*02:01 (P = 0.007; OR 5.7; 95% CI 1.4-24.8), DRB1*03:01 (P = 0.012; OR 4.9; 95% CI 1.2-20.5), and B*08:01 (P = 0.048; OR 3.4; 95% CI 0.9-13.2), which also appeared together whenever present in cases. Additional associations were found with HLA-DPB1*10:01 (P = 0.042; OR 20.9; 95% CI 0.7-infinity) and HLA-DRB1*04:04 (P = 0.042; OR 20.9; 95% CI 0.7-infinity). A strong association with HLA-B*39:01 was identified as a potentially causal risk factor for infliximab-induced DILI. Future work should aim to validate this finding and explore possible mechanisms through which the biologic interacts with this particular allele.

Epidemiology, Predisposing Factors, and Outcomes of Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an underreported and underestimated adverse drug reaction. A recent population-based study found a crude incidence of approximately 19 cases per 100,000 a year. Amoxicillin-clavulanate continues to be the most commonly implicated agent in most Western countries, reported to occur in approximately 1 of 2300 users. In patients with drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis, liver tests often do not normalize with cessation of the drugs and require corticosteroids. DILI associated with jaundice can lead to death from liver failure or require liver transplantation in at least 10% of cases.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Highlights of the Recent Literature

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI), herbal-induced liver injury, and herbal and dietary supplement (HDS)-induced liver injury are an important aspect of drug safety. Knowledge regarding responsible drugs, mechanisms, risk factors, and the diagnostic tools to detect liver injury have continued to grow in the past year. This review highlights what we considered the most significant publications from among more than 1800 articles relating to liver injury from medications, herbal products, and dietary supplements in 2017 and 2018. The US Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) prospective study highlighted several areas of ongoing study, including the potential utility of human leukocyte antigens and microRNAs as DILI risk factors and new data on racial differences, the role of alcohol consumption, factors associated with prognosis, and updates on the clinical signatures of autoimmune DILI, thiopurines, and HDS agents. Novel data were also generated from the Spanish and Latin American DILI registries as well as from Chinese and Korean case series. A few new agents causing DILI were added to the growing list in the past 2 years, including sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, as were new aspects of chemotherapy-associated liver injury. A number of cases reported previously described hepatotoxins confirmed via the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM; e.g., norethisterone, methylprednisolone, glatiramer acetate) and/or the DILIN method (e.g., celecoxib, dimethyl fumarate). Additionally, much work centered on elucidating the pathophysiology of DILI, including the importance of bile salt export pumps and immune-mediated mechanisms. Finally, it must be noted that, while hundreds of new studies described DILI in 2017-2018, the quality of such reports must always be addressed. Björnsson reminds us to remain very critical of the data when addressing the future utility of a study, which is why it is so important to adhere to a standardized method such as RUCAM when determining DILI causality. While drug-induced hepatotoxicity remains a diagnosis of exclusion, the diverse array of publications that appeared in 2017 and 2018 provided important advances in our understanding of DILI, paving the way for our improved ability to make a more definitive diagnosis and risk assessment.

Biologic and Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Liver Injury: A Systematic Literature Review

Biologics are among the most commonly prescribed medications for several chronic inflammatory diseases. Tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors, more so than other agents, have been observed to cause drug‐induced liver injury. Additionally, because the approval and popularity of checkpoint inhibitors have grown, similar patterns of liver injury have been documented, with a majority of cases describing immune‐mediated hepatitis. Although the exact mechanism of injury is unknown, various host and medication characteristics play a role in the outcome of the molecular cascade invoked by biologics. Prognosis is usually favorable with cessation of the offending agent, but cases of acute liver failure requiring liver transplantation have also been observed. Therefore, algorithms have been created to assist clinicians in treating drug‐induced autoimmune hepatitis, mostly with corticosteroids. Additionally, case reports have documented successfully rechallenging patients with a different biologic without recurrence of liver injury, but data are limited. Further investigation is warranted regarding the potential for cross‐reactivity and mechanism of injury to develop guidelines to aid clinicians in further management of these patients.

Increased incidence of autoimmune hepatitis is associated with wider use of biological drugs

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Population-based studies on the epidemiology of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) are scarce. Drug-induced AIH (DIAIH) is increasingly recognized in association with immunomodulatory therapy. We aimed to determine the incidence, prevalence and natural history of AIH in a population-based setting.

METHODS

We collected data of new diagnosis of AIH in Iceland from 2006 to 2015. Cases were identified through search of diagnostic codes and text search for AIH within electronical medical records of all hospitals in Iceland and through records of smooth muscle antibodies (SMA) test results by the only laboratory in the country analyzing SMA. Patients were included in the final analysis if they received the clinical diagnosis of AIH or were started on immunosuppressive therapy.

RESULTS

The mean annual incidence of AIH in Iceland was 2.2 cases per 100 000 inhabitants. Point prevalence on 31 December 2015 was 27/100 000. The median age at diagnosis was 56 years and 86% of patients were of female gender. DIAIH was suspected in 13 of 71 patients (18%) of which eight cases were related to infliximab. Immunosuppressive treatment was started in all but two patients. At the end of follow-up (median 4.8 years) 66 of 71 (93%) patients were alive.

CONCLUSION

The incidence and prevalence rates of AIH in Iceland are the highest reported so far in a population-based setting. Higher incidence can partly be explained by the increasing use of biological drugs. Immunosuppressive therapy was very effective in achieving remission and prognosis was favorable.

The landscape of hepatobiliary adverse reactions across 53 herbal and dietary supplements reveals immune-mediated injury as a common cause of hepatitis

Recent evidence suggests herbal-induced liver injury (HILI) to account for 20% of cases among the U.S. Drug-Induced-Liver-Injury-Network. To define injury patterns of HILI, we reviewed the clinical data of 413 patients exposed to 53 HDS products by considering the evidence for HILI and its grades of severity. Outstandingly, females developed HILI more rapidly (p = 0.018) and the time to recovery was significantly increased (p = 0.0153). > 90% of reported cases were severe and half of HDS products caused acute liver failure (ALF) requiring liver transplantation or resulted in fatal outcomes. Liver biopsies of 243 patients defined 13 histological features; two-thirds of products elicited immune-mediated hepatitis and included 154 Hy's law positive cases. The histological injury patterns were confirmed among unrelated patients, while accidental re-challenges evidenced culprits as causative. Furthermore, one-fifth of patients presented elevated autoantibody titres indicative of autoimmune-like HILI, and one-third of the products were linked to chronic hepatitis and cholestatic injuries not resolving within 6 months. Lastly, INR and TBL are critical laboratory parameters to predict progression of severe HILI to ALF. Our study highlights the need for a regulatory framework to minimize the risk for HILI. Better education of the public and a physician-supervised self-medication plan will be important measures to abate risk of HILI.

The Management of Glucocorticoid Therapy in Liver Failure

Liver failure is characterized by rapid progression and high mortality. Excessive systemic inflammation is considered as the trigger of liver failure. Glucocorticoids (GCs) can rapidly suppress excessive inflammatory reactions and immune response. GCs have been applied in the treatment of liver failure since the 1970s. However, until now, the use of GCs in the treatment of liver failure has been somewhat unclear and controversial. New research regarding the molecular mechanisms of GCs may explain the controversial actions of GCs in liver failure. More results should be confirmed in a larger randomized clinical trial; this can aid the discovery of better definitions in terms of treatment schedules according to different clinical settings. Meanwhile, the timing and dosing of GCs in the treatment of liver failure should also be explored.

Early ALT response to corticosteroid treatment distinguishes idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury from autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) are competing diagnoses in patients with acute liver injury (ALI) and drug intake. In absence of unequivocal markers, scores like RUCAM and AIH are used to distinguish both entities. However, in some cases the diagnosis remains ambiguous. Our aim was to identify a simple parameter to discriminate DILI and AIH shortly after starting corticosteroid treatment.

METHODS

For the current analysis, 44 patients with ALI who took at least one drug and who received corticosteroids were included and comprised 22 DILI and 22 AIH cases. Scores of AIH and RUCAM were calculated at initial presentation, the final diagnosis was made from analysing the course of disease. Changes in the serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentrations after starting corticosteroid treatment were determined and compared between the DILI and AIH groups.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine per cent of patients (n = 26) were correctly classified at presentation by AIH score and RUCAM respectively. However, in one-third (n = 13) of the 44 patients, results were inconclusive and five other patients were misclassified. The decrease in ALT levels 1 week after the initiation of steroid therapy was significantly more pronounced in patients with the final diagnosis of DILI than in AIH patients (accuracy 77%). This difference was also observed in the 18 initially misclassified or inconclusive cases (accuracy 83%).

CONCLUSION

Short-term response of ALT to corticosteroid therapy helps to differentiate DILI and AIH. This finding may be helpful in treatment decision for patients with inconclusive diagnostic scores.

Now You See It, Now You Do Not: A Case of Infliximab-Induced Vanishing Bile Duct Syndrome

Infliximab is a commonly used antitumor necrosis factor alpha agent, especially in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. It has been associated with drug-induced liver injury including immunologic reactions, with rare cases of acute liver failure. We describe a patient with chronic cholestasis and loss of intrahepatic bile ducts after therapy with infliximab for refractory ulcerative colitis consistent with a diagnosis of vanishing bile duct syndrome. About 3 months after the initial infusion, the patient developed subfulminant liver failure and required liver transplantation.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Drug-induced liver injury

Idiosyncratic (unpredictable) drug-induced liver injury is one of the most challenging liver disorders faced by hepatologists, because of the myriad of drugs used in clinical practice, available herbs and dietary supplements with hepatotoxic potential, the ability of the condition to present with a variety of clinical and pathological phenotypes and the current absence of specific biomarkers. This makes the diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury an uncertain process, requiring a high degree of awareness of the condition and the careful exclusion of alternative aetiologies of liver disease. Idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity can be severe, leading to a particularly serious variety of acute liver failure for which no effective therapy has yet been developed. These Clinical Practice Guidelines summarize the available evidence on risk factors, diagnosis, management and risk minimization strategies for drug-induced liver jury.

Acute Severe Autoimmune Hepatitis: Corticosteroids or Liver Transplantation?

Acute severe presentations of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) represent a challenge for the transplant community. As a disease, it is poorly characterized, and there is a weak evidence base to guide diagnosis and treatment. Early identification of acute severe AIH is key because it determines the initiation of corticosteroids, which can be lifesaving. However, their use in this setting remains controversial. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, severity of coagulopathy, and grade of encephalopathy may be predictors of outcome with corticosteroid therapy. The optimal timing of liver transplantation (LT) can be difficult to determine and, as such, the decision to proceed to transplantation should not be delayed by protracted courses of corticosteroids. The aim of this review is to better characterize this subset of patients; to differentiate them clinically, serologically, and histologically from chronic AIH and other causes of acute liver failure; and to present the role, predictors, and optimal timings of corticosteroid therapy and LT. Although this review is specific to adults, many principles hold true for the pediatric population.

Hepatotoxicity induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: a comprehensive review including current and alternative management strategies

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) block cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) receptors that control antitumor activities of lymphocytes. While highly efficacious, these drugs have been associated with several immune-related adverse events (irAEs) due to the disruption of self-tolerance. Immune-mediated hepatitis (IMH) usually presents as mild elevations of liver enzymes though it can rarely be associated with life-threatening hepatic injury. Areas covered: A comprehensive review was performed to define the clinicopathologic forms of liver injury associated with ICIs, comparing the various ICI classes as well as comparing this form of IMH with idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis and drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis. Liver biopsy has proven very useful in selected patients. A specific form of fibrin ring granulomatous hepatitis appears to be associated with IMH. The current societal treatment algorithms and emerging data were reviewed to determine when to utilize corticosteroids. Expert opinion: Monitoring for severe ICI-IMH is recommended although acute liver failure remains rare. Most patients with grade 3-4 hepatotoxicity respond to corticosteroids, but a subset of patients with mild hepatitis on liver biopsy resolve without steroids and need to be carefully selected in concert with the consultation of a hepatologist.

Pharmacogenomics of drug-induced liver injury (DILI): Molecular biology to clinical applications

A 21-year old woman was admitted to hospital with a two-week history of painless jaundice, fatigue and anorexia having previously been fit and well. One month prior to presentation, the patient had taken a five-day course of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid for an infected skin cyst. Otherwise, she was only on the oral contraceptive pill and reported minimal alcohol intake. On examination, she was deeply jaundiced, but alert and oriented with no asterixis. She had no stigmata of chronic liver disease, but hepatomegaly extending 3 cm from below the right subcostal margin was evident. Investigations showed: white cell count 13.4 × 10⁹/L (normal 3.6-9.3), haemoglobin 11.8 g/dl (normal 11-15), platelet count 356 × 10⁹/L (normal 170-420), sodium 138 mmol/L (normal 134-144), potassium 3.5 mmol/L (normal 3.5-5.0), creatinine 32 µmol/L (normal 40-75), albumin 30 g/L (normal 35-48), alanine aminotransferase 707 IU/L (normal 15-54), alkaline phosphatase 151 IU/L (normal 30-130), bilirubin 384 µmol/L (normal 7-31) and prothrombin time 27.2 s (normal 11.7-14). Screening for hepatitis A, B, C, E, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus and autoimmune hepatitis was negative. Tests for anti-smooth muscle, antinuclear, and anti-liver-kidney microsomal-1 antibodies were negative; immunoglobulin levels and ceruloplasmin levels were normal. Liver ultrasonography demonstrated a liver of normal contour with no biliary dilatation, a normal spleen size and patent vessels. Liver biopsy revealed severe portal interface hepatitis with lobular inflammation and scant plasma cells. Her clinical condition deteriorated in the following days with prothrombin time and bilirubin rising to 56.6 s and 470 µmol/L, respectively. At follow-up after 11 days, her alanine aminotransferase level was 1,931 IU/L. She developed grade 2 hepatic encephalopathy 14 days after presentation, and was listed for a super-urgent liver transplant. Human leucocyte antigen (HLA) typing was performed as a part of preparatory investigations and showed the patient carried the HLA haplotype HLA-DRB1∗15:02-DQB1∗06:01. Following orthotopic transplantation of a deceased donor graft her explant histology revealed severe ongoing hepatitis with multi-acinar necrosis (Fig. 1A and B). This case raised a number of important questions about the diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury and tools available for clinicians to make the best decisions for patient care: In this Grand Rounds article, we will explore these questions, describing the pathophysiology, diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, and clinical management of drug-induced liver injury. We will also discuss ongoing areas of uncertainty.

Development and Validation of a Test to Identify Drugs That Cause Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI) is one of the most challenging diagnoses in hepatology. It is frequently impossible to identify the agent that has caused iDILI in patients who take multiple medicines. We developed an in vitro method to identify drugs that cause liver injury in patients, based on drug toxicity to monocyte-derived hepatocyte-like (MH) cells from patient blood samples. We then collected data on patients who were re-exposed to drugs found to be toxic in the MH test to validate test performance.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study of patients referred to the University Hospital in Munich, Germany, with acute liver injury believed to be caused by medications (300 patients were enrolled in the study and we present data from 40 patients with iDILI and re-exposure to implicated drugs). We collected data from patients on medical history, laboratory test and imaging results, findings from biopsy analyses, and medications taken. Blood samples were collected from all patients and MH cells were isolated and cultured for 10 days. MH cells were then incubated with drugs to which each patient had been exposed, and toxicity was measured based on release of lactate dehydrogenase. Agents found to be toxic to MH cells were considered as candidates for the cause of liver injury. Patients were followed up for up to 6 months after liver injury and data on drug re-exposures and subsequent liver damage within the following 3 to 24 months were associated with findings from MH tests.

RESULTS

Our test identified 10 drugs that were toxic to MH cells from 13 patients (amoxicillin/clavulanate to cells from 2 patients; diclofenac to cells from 2 patients; methylprednisolone to cells from 2 patients; and atorvastatin, metamizole, pembrolizumab, piperacillin/tazobactam, moxifloxacin, duloxetine, or sertraline each to cells from 1 patient). Thirteen patients had a recurrence of liver injury after inadvertent re-exposure to a single drug, and the MH test correctly identified 12 of the 13 drugs that caused these liver re-injury events. All 86 drugs that were not toxic to MH cells in our assay were safely resumed by patients and were not associated with liver re-injury in 27 patients. Therefore, the MH test identifies drugs that cause liver injury with 92.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity (1 false-negative and 12 true-positive results).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a test to identify drugs that cause liver injury in patients based on their toxicity to MH cells isolated from patients with DILI. We validated results from the assay and found it to identify drugs that cause DILI with 92.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The MH cell test could be a tool to identify causes of iDILI, even in patients taking multiple medications. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT 02353455.

Differential characteristics in drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DIAIH) is an adverse effect associated with several drugs that usually occurs acutely, with variable latency, and it may potentially be mortal. There are a few reports and studies about DIAIH.

METHODS

This was an analytical study of a retrospective cohort of patients, discriminated according to idiopathic or drug-induced etiology, followed up for a 7-year period until 31 December 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 190 patients were selected for the analysis, 12 (6.3%) with DIAIH. The two main drugs related to DIAIH were nitrofurantoin, n = 8 (67%), and NSAID, n = 2 (17%), constituting 84% of the cases. There were no significant differences in seropositivity between AIH with DIAIH in antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-smooth muscle antibodies (ASMA) antibodies, with 82.6% versus 82.6% and 34% versus 16%, respectively. The fibrosis stages were similar, except for the F4 stage, in a greater proportion in AIH. None of the patients with DIAIH had cirrhosis or developed it during follow-up, but it was present in 42.1% of the AIH cases at diagnosis (P = 0.003). Biochemical remission with management was higher in DIAIH but not significant (91.7% vs 80.9%, P = 0.35). The definitive interruption of immunosuppression was successfully performed in 25% of those with DIAIH without relapses but was only possible in 2.8% in AIH (P < 0.001) with 32 cases of relapses.

CONCLUSION

DIAIH constitutes a minor proportion of AIH. The clinical and histological characteristics may be similar; DIAIH patients have a greater chance of having treatment suspended with a low risk of relapse, progression to cirrhosis, or need for liver transplant.