Statin Therapy Does Not Reduce Liver Fat Scores in Patients Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV Infection

Statins in Chronic Liver Disease: Review of the Literature and Future Role

Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a major contributor to global mortality, morbidity, and healthcare burden. Progress in pharmacotherapeutic for CLD management is lagging given its impact on the global population. While statins are indicated for the management of dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease, their role in CLD prevention and treatment is emerging. Beyond their lipid-lowering effects, their liver-related mechanisms of action are multifactorial and include anti-inflammatory, antiproliferative, and immune-protective effects. In this review, we highlight what is known about the clinical benefits of statins in viral and nonviral etiologies of CLD and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and explore key mechanisms and pathways targeted by statins. While their benefits may span the spectrum of CLD and potentially HCC treatment, their role in CLD chemoprevention is likely to have the largest impact. As emerging data suggest that genetic variants may impact their benefits, the role of statins in precision hepatology will need to be further explored.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Impact of Statin Treatment in HIV Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy

The rate of new human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections globally is alarming. Although antiretroviral therapy (ART) improves the quality of life among this group of patients, ARTs are associated with risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Moreover, virally suppressed patients still experience immune activation associated with HIV migration from reservoir sites. Statins are widely recommended as therapeutic agents to control ART-related CVD; however, their impacts on the cluster of differentiation (CD)4 count and viral load are inconsistent. To assess the effect of statins on markers of HIV infections, immune activation and cholesterol, we thoroughly reviewed evidence from randomised controlled trials. We found 20 relevant trials from three databases with 1802 people living with HIV (PLHIV) on statin-placebo treatment. Our evidence showed no significant effect on CD4 T-cell count standardised mean difference (SMD): (-0.59, 95% confidence intervals (CI): (-1.38, 0.19), p = 0.14) following statin intervention in PLHIV on ART. We also found no significant difference in baseline CD4 T-cell count (SD: (-0.01, 95%CI: (-0.25, 0.23), p = 0.95). Our findings revealed no significant association between statins and risk of viral rebound in PLHIV with undetectable viral load risk ratio (RR): (1.01, 95% CI: (0.98, 1.04), p = 0.65). Additionally, we found a significant increase in CD8⁺CD38⁺HLA-DR⁺ T-cells (SMD (1.10, 95% CI: (0.93, 1.28), p < 0.00001) and CD4⁺CD38⁺HLA-DR⁺ T-cells (SMD (0.92, 95% CI: (0.32, 1.52), p = 0.003). Finally, compared to placebo, statins significantly reduced total cholesterol (SMD: (-2.87, 95% CI: (-4.08, -1.65), p < 0.0001)). Our results suggest that the statin lipid-lowering effect in PLHIV on ART may elevate immune activation without influencing the viral load and CD4 count. However, due to the limited evidence synthesised in this meta-analysis, we recommend that future powered trials with sufficient sample sizes evaluate statins' effect on CD4 count and viral load, especially in virally suppressed patients.

Is there a role of lipid-lowering therapies in the management of fatty liver disease?

Atherogenic dyslipidemia is characterized by increased triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations. It is highly prevalent in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and contributes to the increased cardiovascular risk associated with this condition. Alongside insulin resistance it plays an important pathogenetic role in NAFLD/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) development and progression. It has been shown that cholesterol-lowering reduces cardiovascular risk more in NAFLD vs non-NAFLD high-risk individuals. This evidence highlights the importance of effective lipid modulation in NAFLD. In this narrative review the effects of the most commonly used lipid-lowering therapies on liver outcomes alongside their therapeutic implications in NAFLD/NASH are critically discussed. Preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that statins reduce hepatic steatosis, inflammation and fibrosis in patients with NAFLD/NASH. Most data are derived from observational and small prospective clinical studies using changes in liver enzyme activities, steatosis/fibrosis scores, and imaging evidence of steatosis as surrogates. Also, relevant histologic benefits were noted in small biopsy studies. Atorvastatin and rosuvastatin showed greater benefits, whereas data for other statins are scarce and sometimes conflicting. Similar studies to those of statins showed efficacy of ezetimibe against hepatic steatosis. However, no significant anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic actions of ezetimibe have been shown. Preclinical studies showed that fibrates through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)α activation may have a role in NAFLD prevention and management. Nevertheless, no relevant benefits have been noted in human studies. Species-related differences in PPARα expression and its activation responsiveness may help explain this discrepancy. Omega-3 fatty acids reduced hepatic steatosis in numerous heterogeneous studies, but their benefits on hepatic inflammation and fibrosis have not been established. Promising preliminary data for the highly purified eicosapentaenoic acid require further confirmation. Observational studies suggest that proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin9 inhibitors may also have a role in the management of NAFLD, though this needs to be established by future prospective studies.

Prevalence and risk factors of metabolic associated fatty liver disease among people living with HIV in China

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The new definition for metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), formerly named non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), would undoubtedly have significant influence on diagnosis, epidemiology, and new drug research. We investigated the prevalence and risk factors of MAFLD among people living with HIV (PLWH).

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, transient elastography was performed in PLWH without significant alcohol intake and hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection. NAFLD was diagnosed as controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) ≥ 248 dB/m by transient elastography, and MAFLD was defined according to the 2020 international consensus. Advanced fibrosis was defined as liver stiffness measurement (LSM) ≥ 10 kPa.

RESULTS

Among the 361 PLWH enrolled, the prevalence of NAFLD and MAFLD were 37.67% and 34.90%, respectively. Compared with the non-MAFLD group, the prevalence of elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level (44.44% vs 16.17%, P < 0.001) and advanced fibrosis (19.05% vs 2.55%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the MAFLD group. A positive correlation between LSM and CAP values was found in the MAFLD group (r_s  = 0.350, P < 0.001) but not in the non-MAFLD group. In multivariate analysis, independent risk predictors for MAFLD were higher ALT level (odds ratio [OR] 1.015, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.003-1.028, P = 0.018), higher uric acid (OR 1.005, 95% CI 1.002-1.009, P = 0.003), higher total cholesterol (OR 1.406, 95% CI 1.029-1.921, P = 0.032), and greater waist-height ratio (OR 1.291, 95% CI 1.196-1.393, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A third of PLWH had MAFLD, which was highly accordant with the prevalence of NAFLD. Routine screening for MAFLD is necessary in PLWH.

Diagnostic accuracy assessment of molecular prediction model for the risk of NAFLD based on MRI-PDFF diagnosed Chinese Han population

Background

Several molecular prediction models based on the clinical parameters had been constructed to predict and diagnosis the risk of NAFLD, but the accuracy of these molecular prediction models remains need to be verified based on the most accurate NAFLD diagnostic method. The aim of this study was to verify the accuracy of three molecular prediction models Fatty liver index (FLI), NAFLD liver fat score system (NAFLD LFS), and Liver fat (%) in the prediction and diagnosis of NAFLD in MRI-PDFF diagnosed Chinese Han population.

Patients and methods

MRI-PDFF was used to diagnose the hepatic steatosis of all the subjects. Information such as name, age, lifestyle, and major medical histories were collected and the clinical parameters were measured by the standard clinical laboratory techniques. The cut-off values of each model for the risk of NAFLD were calculated based on the MRI-PDFF results. All data were analyzed using the statistical analysis software SPSS 23.0.

Results

A total of 169 subjects were recruited with the matched sex and age. The ROC curves of FLI, NAFLD LFS, and Liver fat (%) models were plotted based on the results of MRI-PDFF. We founded that the accuracy of FLI, NAFLD LFS, and Liver fat (%) models for the prediction and diagnosis of NAFLD were comparative available in Chinese Han population as well as the validity of them in other ethnics and regions.

Conclusions

The molecular prediction models FLI, NAFLD LFS, and Liver fat (%) were comparative available for the prediction and diagnosis of NAFLD in Chinese Han population. MRI-PDFF could be used as the golden standard to develop the new molecular prediction models for the prediction and diagnosis of NAFLD.

Brief Report: Gut Structural Damage: an Ongoing Process in Chronically Untreated HIV Infection

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the longitudinal changes of gut structural damage in chronically untreated HIV infection.

DESIGN

This is a 96-week prospective, single-site, cohort study of antiretroviral therapy-naive HIV-infected participants.

METHODS

Intestinal fatty acid-binding proteins (I-FABP) were used as a surrogate marker of gut structural damage. We assessed changes in I-FABP over 96 weeks and examined the associations between I-FABP, HIV variables, and inflammation. Spearman's correlations and linear mixed-effect models were used to study relationships among variables.

RESULTS

A total of 63 HIV-infected, antiretroviral therapy-naive patients were included in this analysis. At baseline, 76% were male; 62% were African American, with median age and body mass index of 40 years and 27 kg/m, respectively. Median HIV-RNA and CD4 T-cell counts were 5520 copies per milliliter and 588 cells per mm, respectively. I-FABP significantly increased from baseline to week 96 (mean change +333.9 pg/mL; P = 0.03), and this increase was associated with viral replication (rho = +0.4; P = 0.03). I-FABP levels were found to be associated with markers of inflammation: sTNFR-II (rho = 0.4, P = 0.02) and sVCAM-1 (rho = 0.04; P < 0.01) at all study time points. Lower baseline CD4 T-cell counts was found to be independently associated with I-FABP progression after adjusting for baseline characteristic variables (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Gut structural damage is an ongoing process in the chronic phase of untreated HIV infection and is largely dependent on viral replication. I-FABP was found to be associated with worse immune function, increased inflammation, and viremia in chronically untreated HIV infection, supporting its role as a biomarker of intestinal barrier dysfunction.

Improvement in liver steatosis after the switch from a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor to raltegravir in HIV-infected patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Background: The ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) use has been associated with several metabolic abnormalities, and the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is becoming a very frequent comorbidity among HIV-infected patients. Methods: We performed an observational, prospective study of HIV-infected patients with NAFLD, receiving one PI/r plus two nucleoside analogues, who switched from the PI/r to raltegravir or were treated only with lifestyle modification, maintaining antiretroviral therapy unchanged. Changes in liver steatosis after 12 months were evaluated by transient elastography and measurement of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). Results: As a whole, 61 patients (46 males; median age, 55.4 years) were enrolled, and 32 of them have been switched from PI/r to raltegravir. At baseline, median CAP was 259 dB/m, 28 (45.9%) subjects had a moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis (CAP ≥260 dB/m), and 19 patients (31.1%) had elevated aminotransferases. Type-2 diabetes mellitus was present in 5 persons, and chronic HCV coinfection in 4. At month 12, the median decrease in CAP values was -27 dB/m in patients switched to raltegravir and -11 dB/m in those with unchanged cART (p = .021). The number of patients with CAP ≥260 dB/m decreased from 16 to 6 (-62.5%) in patients switched to raltegravir and from 12 to 8 (-33.3%) in the other group (p = .037). Conclusion: After 12 months, HIV-infected patients with NAFLD switching from a PI/r to raltegravir showed a significantly greater decrease in the hepatic steatosis degreee in comparison with those with unchanged cART and treated only with lifestyle modification.

Effects of Pitavastatin on Insulin Sensitivity and Liver Fat: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Context

3-Hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) are widely prescribed. Statins may have important metabolic effects on insulin sensitivity and liver fat, but limited studies have assessed these effects by using euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, stable isotopes, and 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) for liver fat quantification.

Objective

To study the effects of pitavastatin on hepatic fat and insulin sensitivity.

Design

Six-month, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Setting

Academic clinical research center in Boston, Massachusetts.

Participants

Overweight, insulin-resistant men aged 40 to 65 years who had not received statin therapy for ≥1 year.

Interventions

Pitavastatin 4 mg or placebo daily.

Outcome

The primary endpoints were changes in insulin sensitivity measured by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp and liver fat measured by 1H MRS.

Results

Pitavastatin showed no effect on endogenous glucose production (ΔRa glucose 0.07 ± 0.07 vs 0.04 ± 0.07 mg/kg/min, pitavastatin vs placebo, P = 0.76) or insulin-stimulated glucose uptake during "low dose" (ΔM 0.1 ± 0.1 vs -0.3 ± 0.2 mg/kg/min, P = 0.11) and "high dose" (ΔM -0.5 ± 0.3 vs -0.7 ± 0.4 mg/kg/min, P = 0.70) euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamps. There was also no effect of pitavastatin on fasting glucose, HbA1c, and 2-hour glucose after 75-g glucose challenge. There was also no change in liver fat fraction (-1 ± 1 vs -0 ± 1%, P = 0.56).

Conclusion

Compared with placebo, pitavastatin did not affect hepatic or whole-body insulin sensitivity, and it did not reduce liver fat.