Utility of Ultrasound-Guided Attenuation Parameter for Grading Steatosis With Reference to MRI-PDFF in a Large Cohort

Performance of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter and 2D shear wave elastography in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

PURPOSE

To assess the performance and the reproducibility of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) and two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) in patients with biopsy-proven metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).

METHODS

This study included consecutive adult patients with MASLD who underwent ultrasound with UGAP, 2D-SWE and percutaneous liver biopsy. The median values of 12 consecutive UGAP measurements were acquired by two independent radiologists (R1 and R2). Hepatic steatosis was graded by liver biopsy as: (0) < 5%; (1) 5-33%; (2) > 33-66%; (3) > 66%. Areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated to determine the diagnostic performance. Inter- and intra-observer reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

A hundred patients (median age 55.0 years old) with MASLD were prospectively enrolled. At histopathology, 70 and 42 patients had grade ≥ 2 and 3 steatosis, respectively. Median UGAP was 0.78 dB/cm/MHz (IQR/Med: 5.55%). For the diagnosis of grade ≥ 2 steatosis, the AUCs of UGAP were 0.828 (95% CI: 0.739, 0.896) for R1 and 0.779 (95% CI: 0.685, 0.856) for R2. The inter- and intra-operator reliability of UGAP were excellent, with an ICC of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92-0.96), respectively. The median liver stiffness was 6.76 kPa (IQR/Med: 16.30%). For the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis, 2D-SWE had an AUC of 0.862 (95% CI: 0.757, 0.934), and the optimal cutoff value was > 6.75 kPa with a sensitivity of 80.6% and a specificity of 75.7%.

CONCLUSION

UGAP and 2D-SWE provide a good performance for the staging of steatosis and fibrosis in patients with MASLD with an excellent intra-operator reliability of UGAP.

KEY POINTS

Question How well do ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) and two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) perform for quantifying hepatic steatosis and fibrosis? Findings UGAP had a maximum AUC of 0.828 for the diagnosis of grade ≥ 2 steatosis, and 2D-SWE had an AUC of 0.862 for diagnosing advanced fibrosis. Clinical relevance UGAP and 2D-SWE allow rapid, reproducible, and accurate quantification of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis that can be used for the noninvasive assessment of patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

Multiparametric liver assessment in patients successfully treated for hepatitis C: a 4-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major cause of chronic liver disease, in which liver stiffness increases. Liver stiffness measurements (LSM) are therefore essential in diagnosing liver diseases and predicting disease development. The study objective was to perform a comprehensive prospective assessment of the liver before, after and 4 years after treatment for HCV, including an assessment of the long-term outcome of fibrosis, steatosis and inflammation.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Patients eligible for HCV treatment were included prospectively in 2018 (n = 47). Liver stiffness was measured using transient elastography and 2D shear-wave elastography (SWE). Blood tests, B-mode ultrasound (US) and SWE, were performed before, after (end of treatment [EOT]), 3 months after (EOT3) and 4 years after treatment (4Y). At the final visit, we added attenuation imaging and shear-wave dispersion slope (SWDS) measurements to assess steatosis and inflammation. Three months after treatment, the sustained virologic response rate was 93%. The median liver stiffness for baseline, EOT, EOT3 and 4Y was 8.1, 5.9, 5.6 and 6.3 kPa, respectively. There was a significant reduction in liver stiffness from baseline to EOT, and from EOT to EOT3. After 4 years, the mean attenuation coefficient (AC) was 0.58 dB/cm/MHz, and the mean SWDS value was 14.3 (m/s)/kHz.

CONCLUSION

The treatment for HCV was highly effective. Measurements of liver stiffness decreased significantly after treatment and remained low after 4 years. AC measurements indicated low levels of liver steatosis. Shear-wave dispersion values indicated inflammation of the liver, but the clinical implication is undetermined and should be explored in larger studies.Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03434470.

ABBREVIATIONS

AC: attenuation coefficient; APRI: aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index; ATI: attenuation imaging; cACLD: compensated advanced chronic liver disease; CAP: controlled attenuation parameter; FIB-4: Fibrosis-4 Index for liver fibrosis; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; LSM: liver stiffness measurement; NAFLD: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH: non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; SWDS: shear-wave dispersion slope; SWE: shear-wave elastography; US: ultrasound.

Novel Quantitative Liver Steatosis Assessment Method With Ultrasound Harmonic Imaging

OBJECTIVES

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is the most prevalent liver disorder in Western countries, with approximately 20%-30% of the MASLD patients progressing to severe stages. There is an urgent need for noninvasive, cost-effective, widely accessible, and precise biomarkers to evaluate liver steatosis. This study aims to assess and compare the diagnostic performance of a novel reference frequency method-based ultrasound attenuation coefficient estimation (ACE) in both fundamental (RFM-ACE-FI) and harmonic (RFM-ACE-HI) imaging for detecting and grading liver steatosis.

METHODS

An Institutional Review Board-approved prospective study was carried out between December 2018 and October 2022. A total number of 130 subjects were enrolled in the study. The correlation between RFM-ACE-HI values and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF), as well as between RFM-ACE-FI values and MRI-PDFF were calculated. The diagnostic performance of RFM-ACE-FI and RFM-ACE-HI was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, as compared to MRI-PDFF. The reproducibility of RFM-ACE-HI was assessed by interobserver agreement between two sonographers.

RESULTS

A strong correlation was observed between RFM-ACE-HI and MRI-PDFF, with R = 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.92; P < .001), while the correlation between RFM-ACE-FI and MRI-PDFF was R = 0.65 (95% CI: 0.50-0.76; P < .001). The area under the ROC (AUROC) curve for RFM-ACE-HI in staging liver steatosis grades of S ≥ 1 and S ≥ 2 was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.91-0.99; P < .001) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.93-1.00; P < .001), respectively, and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.65-0.85) and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.70-0.88) for RFM-ACE-FI, respectively. Great reproducibility was achieved for RFM-ACE-HI, with an interobserver agreement of R = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94-0.99; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The novel RFM-ACE-HI method offered high liver steatosis diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility, which has important clinical implications for early disease intervention and treatment evaluation.

Ultrasound evaluation of chronic liver disease

Chronic liver disease is a world-wide epidemic. Any etiology that causes inflammation in the liver will lead to chronic liver disease. Presently, the most common inciting factor worldwide is steatotic liver disease. Recent advances in ultrasound imaging provide a multiparametric ultrasound methodology of diagnosing, staging, and monitoring treatment of chronic liver disease. Elastography has become a standard of care technique for the evaluation of liver fibrosis. Quantitative ultrasound allows for determination of the degree of fatty infiltration of the liver. Portal hypertension is the most important factor in determination of liver decompensation. B-mode findings combined with Doppler, and elastography techniques provide qualitative and quantitative methods of determining clinically significant portal hypertension. A newer method using contrast enhanced ultrasound may allow for a non-invasive quantitative estimation of the portal pressures. This paper reviews the use of multiparametric ultrasound in the evaluation of chronic liver disease including conventional B-mode ultrasound, Doppler, elastography and quantitative ultrasound for estimation of liver fat. The recent guidelines are presented and advised protocols reviewed.

Quantitative Ultrasound and Ultrasound-Based Elastography for Chronic Liver Disease: Practical Guidance, From the AJR Special Series on Quantitative Imaging

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and ultrasound-based elastography techniques are emerging as non-invasive effective methods for assessing chronic liver disease. They are more accurate than B-mode imaging alone and more accessible than MRI as alternatives to liver biopsy. Early detection and monitoring of diffuse liver processes such as steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis play an important role in guiding patient management. The most widely available and validated techniques are attenuation-based QUS techniques and shear-wave elastography techniques that measure shear-wave speed. Other techniques are supported by a growing body of evidence and are increasingly commercialized. This review explains general physical concepts of QUS and ultrasound-based elastography techniques for evaluating chronic liver disease. The first section describes QUS techniques relying on attenuation, backscatter, and speed of sound. The second section discusses ultrasound-based elastography techniques analyzing shear-wave speed, shear-wave dispersion, and shear-wave attenuation. With an emphasis on clinical implementation, each technique's diagnostic performance along with thresholds for various clinical applications are summarized, to provide guidance on analysis and reporting for radiologists. Measurement methods, advantages, and limitations are also discussed. The third section explores developments in quantitative contrast-enhanced and vascular ultrasound that are relevant to chronic liver disease evaluation.

Diagnostic performance of shear wave measurement in the detection of hepatic fibrosis: A multicenter prospective study

AIM

This study aimed to establish the shear wave measurement (SWM) cut-off value for each fibrosis stage using magnetic resonance (MR) elastography values as a reference standard.

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed 594 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent SWM and MR elastography. Correlation coefficients (were analyzed, and the diagnostic value was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Liver stiffness was categorized by MR elastography as F0 (<2.61 kPa), F1 (≥2.61 kPa, <2.97 kPa, any fibrosis), F2 (≥2.97 kPa, <3.62 kPa, significant fibrosis), F3 (≥3.62 kPa, <4.62 kPa, advanced fibrosis), or F4 (≥4.62 kPa, cirrhosis).

RESULTS

The median SWM values increased significantly with increasing fibrosis stage (p < 0.001). The correlation coefficient between SWM and MR elastography values was 0.793 (95% confidence interval 0.761-0.821). The correlation coefficients between SWM and MR elastography values significantly decreased with increasing body mass index and skin-capsular distance; skin-capsular distance values were associated with significant differences in sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, or positive predictive value, whereas body mass index values were not. The best cut-off values for any fibrosis, significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis were 6.18, 7.09, 8.05, and 10.89 kPa, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter study in a large number of patients established SWM cut-off values for different degrees of fibrosis in chronic liver diseases using MR elastography as a reference standard. It is expected that these cut-off values will be applied to liver diseases in the future.

Altered probe pressure and body position increase diagnostic accuracy for men and women in detecting hepatic steatosis using quantitative ultrasound

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) for evaluating liver fat content with different probe forces and body positions, in relation to sex, and compared with proton density fat fraction (PDFF).

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled a metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) cohort that underwent UGAP and PDFF in the autumn of 2022. Mean UGAP values were obtained in supine and 30° left decubitus body position with normal 4 N and increased 30 N probe force. The diagnostic performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Among 60 individuals (mean age 52.9 years, SD 12.9; 30 men), we found the best diagnostic performance with increased probe force in 30° left decubitus position (AUC 0.90; 95% CI 0.82-0.98) with a cut-off of 0.58 dB/cm/MHz. For men, the best performance was in supine (AUC 0.91; 95% CI 0.81-1.00) with a cut-off of 0.60 dB/cm/MHz, and for women, 30° left decubitus position (AUC 0.93; 95% CI 0.83-1.00), with a cut-off 0.56 dB/cm/MHz, and increased 30 N probe force for both genders. No difference was in the mean UGAP value when altering body position. UGAP showed good to excellent intra-reproducibility (Intra-class correlation 0.872; 95% CI 0.794-0.921).

CONCLUSION

UGAP provides excellent diagnostic performance to detect liver fat content in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver diseases, with good to excellent intra-reproducibility. Regardless of sex, the highest diagnostic accuracy is achieved with increased probe force with men in supine and women in 30° left decubitus position, yielding different cut-offs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The ultrasound method ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter shows excellent diagnostic accuracy and performs with good to excellent reproducibility. There is a possibility to alter body position and increase probe pressure, and different performances for men and women should be considered for the highest accuracy.

KEY POINTS

• There is a possibility to alter body position when performing the ultrasound method ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter. • Increase probe pressure for the highest accuracy. • Different performances for men and women should be considered.

An ultrasound multiparametric method to quantify liver fat using magnetic resonance as standard reference

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There is an unmet need for a reliable and reproducible non-invasive measure of fatty liver content (FLC) for monitoring steatotic liver disease in clinical practice. Sonographic FLC assessment is qualitative and operator-dependent, and the dynamic quantification range of algorithms based on a single ultrasound (US) parameter is unsatisfactory. This study aims to develop and validate a new multiparametric algorithm based on B-mode images to quantify FLC using Magnetic Resonance (MR) values as standard reference.

METHODS

Patients with elevated liver enzymes and/or bright liver at US (N = 195) underwent FLC evaluation by MR and by US. Five US-derived quantitative features [attenuation rate(AR), hepatic renal-ratio(HR), diaphragm visualization(DV), hepatic-portal-vein-ratio(HPV), portal-vein-wall(PVW)] were combined by mixed linear/exponential regression in a multiparametric model (Steatoscore2.0). One hundred and thirty-four subjects were used for training and 61 for independent validations; score-computation underwent an inter-operator reproducibility analysis.

RESULTS

The model is based on a mixed linear/exponential combination of 3 US parameters (AR, HR, DV), modelled by 2 equations according to AR values. The computation of FLC by Steatoscore2.0 (mean ± std, 7.91% ± 8.69) and MR (mean ± std, 8.10% ± 10.31) is highly correlated with a low root mean square error in both training/validation cohorts, respectively (R = 0.92/0.86 and RMSE = 5.15/4.62, p < .001). Steatoscore2.0 identified patients with MR-FLC≥5%/≥10% with sensitivity = 93.2%/89.4%, specificity = 86.1%/95.8%, AUROC = 0.958/0.975, respectively and correlated with MR (R = 0.92) significantly (p < .001) better than CAP (R = 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiparametric Steatoscore2.0 measures FLC providing values highly comparable with MR. It is reliable, inexpensive, easy to use with any US equipment and qualifies to be tested in larger, prospective studies as new tool for the non-invasive screening and monitoring of FLC.

WFUMB Guidelines/Guidance on Liver Multiparametric Ultrasound. Part 2: Guidance on Liver Fat Quantification

The World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) has promoted the development of this document on multiparametric ultrasound. Part 2 is a guidance on the use of the available tools for the quantification of liver fat content with ultrasound. These are attenuation coefficient, backscatter coefficient, and speed of sound. All of them use the raw data of the ultrasound beam to estimate liver fat content. This guidance has the aim of helping the reader in understanding how they work and interpret the results. Confounding factors are discussed and a standardized protocol for measurement acquisition is suggested to mitigate them. The recommendations were based on published studies and experts' opinion but were not formally graded because the body of evidence remained low at the time of drafting this document.

A comparative study of hepatic steatosis using two different qualitative ultrasound techniques measured based on magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of attenuation measurement (ATT; dual-frequency method) and improved algorithm of ATT (iATT; reference method) for the assessment of hepatic steatosis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived proton density fat fraction (PDFF) as the reference standard.

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed 427 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent ATT, iATT, or MRI-derived PDFF. Correlation coefficients were analyzed, and diagnostic values were evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The steatosis grade was categorized as S0 (<5.2%), S1 (≥5.2%, <11.3%), S2 (≥11.3%, <17.1%), and S3 (≥17.1%) according to MRI-derived PDFF values.

RESULTS

The median ATT and iATT values were 0.61 dB/cm/MHz (interquartile range 0.55-0.67 dB/cm/MHz) and 0.66 dB/cm/MHz (interquartile range 0.57-0.77 dB/cm/MHz). ATT and iATT values increased significantly as the steatosis grade increased in the order S0, S1, S2, and S3 (p < 0.001). The correlation coefficients between ATT or iATT values and MRI-derived PDFF values were 0.533 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.477-0.610) and 0.803 (95% CI 0.766-0.834), with a significant difference between them (p < 0.001). For the detection of hepatic steatosis of ≥S1, ≥S2, and ≥S3, iATT yielded AUROCs of 0.926 (95% CI 0.901-0.951), 0.913 (95% CI 0.885-0.941), and 0.902 (95% CI 0.869-0.935), with significantly higher AUROC values than for ATT (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

iATT showed excellent diagnostic performance for hepatic steatosis, and was strongly correlated with MRI-derived PDFF, with AUROCs of ≥0.900.

Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-derived fat fraction for the detection and quantification of hepatic steatosis in patients with liver biopsy

PURPOSE

This retrospective study was conducted to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-derived fat fraction (UDFF) for grading hepatic steatosis using liver histology as the reference standard.

METHODS

Seventy-three patients with liver disease were assessed using UDFF and liver biopsy. Pearson's test and the Bland-Altman plot were used to assess the correlation between UDFF and histological fat content in liver sections. The UDFF cutoff values for histologically proven steatosis grades were determined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 66 (interquartile range 54-74) years, and 33 (45%) were females. The UDFF values showed a stepwise increase with increasing steatosis grade (p < .001) and were strongly correlated with the histological fat content (r = .7736, p < .001). The Bland-Altman plot revealed a mean bias of 2.384% (95% limit of agreement, - 6.582 to 11.351%) between them. Univariate regression analysis revealed no significant predictors of divergence. The AUROCs for distinguishing steatosis grades of ≥ 1, ≥2, and 3 were 0.956 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.910-1.00), 0.926 (95% CI, 0.860-0.993), and 0.971 (95% CI, 0.929-1.000), respectively. The UDFF cutoff value of > 6% had a sensitivity and specificity of 94.8% and 82.3%, respectively, for diagnosing steatosis grade ≥ 1. There was no association between UDFF and the fibrosis stage.

CONCLUSION

UDFF shows strong agreement with the histological fat content and excellent diagnostic accuracy for grading steatosis. UDFF is a promising tool for detecting and quantifying hepatic steatosis in clinical practice.

iATT liver fat quantification for steatosis grading by referring to MRI proton density fat fraction: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Several preliminary reports have suggested the utility of ultrasound attenuation coefficient measurements based on B-mode ultrasound, such as iATT, for diagnosing steatotic liver disease. Nonetheless, evidence supporting such utility is lacking. This prospective study aimed to investigate whether iATT is highly concordant with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) and could well distinguish between steatosis grades.

METHODS

A cohort of 846 individuals underwent both iATT and MRI-PDFF assessments. Steatosis grade was defined as grade 0 with MRI-PDFF < 5.2%, grade 1 with 5.2% MRI-PDFF < 11.3%, grade 2 with 11.3% MRI-PDFF < 17.1%, and grade 3 with MRI-PDFF of 17.1%. The reproducibility of iATT and MRI-PDFF was evaluated using the Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients, whereas the diagnostic performance of each steatosis grade was examined using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

The Bland-Altman analysis indicated excellent reproducibility with minimal fixed bias between iATT and MRI-PDFF. The area under the curve for distinguishing steatosis grades 1, 2, and 3 were 0.887, 0.882, and 0.867, respectively. A skin-to-capsula distance of ≥ 25 mm was identified as the only significant factor causing the discrepancy. No interaction between MRI-logPDFF and MRE-LSM on iATT values was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to MRI-PDFF, iATT showed excellent diagnostic accuracy in grading steatosis. iATT could be used as a diagnostic tool instead of MRI in clinical practice and trials. Trial registration This study was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000047411).

Performance of ATT and UDFF in the diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver: An animal experiment

Objective

To establish a Bama minipigs model with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver (NAFL) induced by a high-fat diet and investigate the application of attenuation coefficient (ATT) and ultrasound-derived fat fraction (UDFF) in the diagnosis of NAFL.

Methods

Six-month-old male Bama minipigs were randomly divided into normal control and high-fat groups (n = 3 pigs per group), and fed with a control diet and high-fat diet for 32 weeks. Weight and body length were measured every four weeks, followed by quantitative ultrasound imaging (ATT and UDFF), blood biochemical markers, and liver biopsies on the same day. Using the Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Score (NAS) as a reference, we analyzed the correlation between ATT, UDFF, and their score results.

Results

Compared with the normal control group, the body weight, body mass index (BMI), and serum levels of triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in the High-fat group were significantly different at Week 12 (P < 0.05). Spearman correlation analysis showed that the ATT value was significantly correlated with NAS score (r = 0.76, P < 0.001), and the UDFF value was significantly correlated with NAS score (r = 0.80, P < 0.001). The optimal cut-off value of ATT and UDFF were 0.59 dB/cm/MHz and 5.5%, respectively. These values are optimal for diagnosis of NAFL in Bama minipig model.

Conclusion

ATT and UDFF have a high correlation with steatosis, and can be used as a non-invasive method for early screening of hepatic steatosis, which can dynamically monitor the change of disease course.

Advanced fibrosis leads to overestimation of steatosis with quantitative ultrasound in individuals without hepatic steatosis

PURPOSE

The effect of hepatic fibrosis stage on quantitative ultrasound based on the attenuation coefficient (AC) for liver lipid quantification is controversial. The objective of this study was to determine how the degree of fibrosis assessed by magnetic resonance (MR) elastography affects AC based on the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter according to the grade of hepatic steatosis, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived proton density fat fraction (MRIderived PDFF) as the reference standard.

METHODS

Between February 2020 and April 2021, 982 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent AC and MRI-derived PDFF measurement as well as MR elastography were enrolled. Multiple regression was used to investigate whether AC was affected by the degree of liver stiffness.

RESULTS

AC increased as liver stiffness progressed in 344 patients without hepatic steatosis (P=0.009). In multivariable analysis, AC was positively correlated with skin-capsule distance (P<0.001), MR elastography value (P=0.037), and MRI-derived PDFF (P<0.001) in patients without hepatic steatosis. In 52 of 982 patients (5%), the correlation between AC and MRIderived PDFF fell outside the 95% confidence interval for the regression line slope. Patients with MRI-derived PDFF lower than their AC (n=36) had higher fibrosis-4 scores, albumin-bilirubin scores, and MR elastography values than patients with MRI-derived PDFF greater than their AC (n=16; P=0.018, P=0.001, and P=0.011, respectively).

CONCLUSION

AC is affected by liver fibrosis (MR elastography value ≥6.7 kPa) only in patients without hepatic steatosis (MRI-derived PDFF <5.2%). These values should be interpreted with caution in patients with advanced liver fibrosis.

Reliability and stability of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter in evaluating hepatic steatosis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to explore the reliability and stability of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) values obtained by two measuring methods and different measuring times.

METHODS

Patients who underwent liver UGAP examinations in our hospital from September 2022 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical data and UGAP measurements results were collected. Two different measuring methods: static single-frame multi-point measuring and dynamic multi-frame single-point measuring, were performed for each patient, and 10 UGAP values of each measuring method were recorded. The medians of the UGAP values of the 1st-3rd, 1st-5th, 1st-7th and 1st-10th by each measuring method were taken as the final UGAP values of measuring 3, 5, 7 and 10 times. The UGAP values obtained by the two different measuring methods and different measuring times (3, 5, 7 or 10 times) were compared.

RESULTS

206 patients were included in this study. There was no statistical difference between UGAP values measured by static single-frame multi-point measuring and dynamic multi-frame single-point measuring (P = 0.689, P = 0.270, P = 0.298, P = 0.091), regardless of measuring times (3, 5, 7, 10 times). No significant difference between the UGAP values obtained by 3, 5, 7 and 10 measurements was found (P = 0.554, P = 0.916).

CONCLUSION

The UGAP values obtained by the two different measuring methods and different measuring times (3, 5, 7 and 10 times) are stable and reliable. Additionally, 3 times of UGAP measurements might be enough for each patient in clinical practice.

Modified multi-Rayleigh model-based statistical analysis of ultrasound envelope for quantification of liver steatosis and fibrosis

PURPOSE

Quantitative diagnosis of the degree of fibrosis progression is currently a focus of attention for fatty liver in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). However, previous studies have focused on either lipid droplets or fibrotic tissue, and few have reported the evaluation of both in patients whose livers contain adipose and fibrous features. Our aim was to evaluate fibrosis tissue and lipid droplets in the liver.

METHODS

We used an analytical method combining the multi-Rayleigh (MRA) model and a healthy liver structure filter (HLSF) as a technique for statistical analysis of the amplitude envelope to estimate fat and fibrotic volumes in clinical datasets with different degrees of fat and fibrosis progression.

RESULTS

Fat mass was estimated based on the non-MRA fraction corresponding to the signal characteristics of aggregated lipid droplets. Non-MRA fraction has a positive correlation with fat mass and is effective for detecting moderate and severe fatty livers. Progression of fibrosis was estimated using MRA parameters in combination with the HLSF. The proposed method was used to extract non-healthy areas with characteristics of fibrotic tissue. Fibrosis in early fatty liver suggested the possibility of evaluation. On the other hand, fat was identified as a factor that reduced the accuracy of estimating fibrosis progression in moderate and severe fatty livers.

CONCLUSION

The proposed method was used to simultaneously evaluate fat mass and fibrosis progression in early fatty liver, suggesting the possibility of quantitative evaluation for discriminating between lipid droplets and fibrous tissue in the early fatty liver.

Lymphatic drainage dysfunction via narrowing of the lumen of cisterna chyli and thoracic duct after luminal dilation

BACKGROUND

The chronological pattern of extrahepatic lymphatic vessel progression in the course of chronic liver disease has not been clarified. This study aimed to clarify the chronological changes in lymphatic vessels with liver disease progression.

METHODS

This was a prospective cross-sectional study that enrolled a total of 199 patients. The maximum diameter of the cisterna chyli (CC) or terminal thoracic duct (tTD) was measured using computed tomography or ultrasonography, respectively. Changes in the maximum diameters of the CC and tTD were evaluated with patients with chronic liver disease as the pilot set (n = 138). Subsequently, we examined whether CC/tTD could be used to re-allocate unclassified patients by the Baveno-VII criteria to appropriately diagnose clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in the pilot and validation sets.

RESULTS

In the pilot set, a scatter-plot showed that both CC and tTD were narrowed as terminal features in chronic liver disease after dilation. Because there was a significant correlation between the CC diameter and hepatic venous pressure gradient (r = 0.724) in unclassified patients, the diagnostic value of CC and tTD for CSPH was good (AUC: 0.961 and 0.913, respectively). After re-allocation, 68 and 27 unclassified patients were reduced to 4 and 5 in the pilot and validation sets, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both the CC and tTD narrow in the course of liver disease after dilation. Moreover, the maximum diameter of the CC and tTD can be used to re-allocate patients who are unclassified according to the Baveno-VII criteria.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

UMIN trial no. 000044857.

B-mode shear wave elastography can be an alternative method to vibration-controlled transient elastography according to a moderate-scale population study

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) with shear wave elastography (SWE) without previous analysis and generate regression equations between VCTE and new point SWE using combination-elastography.

METHODS

Overall, 829 patients with chronic liver disease were enrolled in this study. Patients with a skin-liver capsule distance > 25 mm were excluded. The reproducibility of VCTE and SWE was confirmed in a phantom study and a clinical study. Considering that combination-elastography allows measurement based on strain elastography, a similar analysis was performed for the liver fibrosis index (LFI), which is a quantitative value for evaluation of liver fibrosis calculated using strain elastography image features. Regression equations between the VCTE and SWE values were obtained based on linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

In the phantom study and clinical study, there was a strong correlation between VCTE and SWE [r = 0.995 (p < 0.001) and r = 0.747 (p < 0.001), respectively). The regression equation between VCTE and SWE was VCTE (kPa) = 1.09 × point SWE (kPa) - 0.17. The Bland-Altman plots revealed no statistically significant bias. Meanwhile, there was no correlation between VCTE and LFI (r = 0.279). There was a statistically significant bias between VCTE and LFI in the Bland-Altman plots. The inter-operator reliability showed a good intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.760 (95% confidence interval: 0.720-0.779).

CONCLUSION

Liver stiffness measured using point SWE was comparable to that measured using VCTE.

Multivariable Quantitative US Parameters for Assessing Hepatic Steatosis

Background Because of the global increase in the incidence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, the development of noninvasive, widely available, and highly accurate methods for assessing hepatic steatosis is necessary. Purpose To evaluate the performance of models with different combinations of quantitative US parameters for their ability to predict at least 5% steatosis in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) as defined using MRI proton density fat fraction (PDFF). Materials and Methods Patients with CLD were enrolled in this prospective multicenter study between February 2020 and April 2021. Integrated backscatter coefficient (IBSC), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and US-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) were measured in all participants. Participant MRI PDFF value was used to define at least 5% steatosis. Four models based on different combinations of US parameters were created: model 1 (UGAP alone), model 2 (UGAP with IBSC), model 3 (UGAP with SNR), and model 4 (UGAP with IBSC and SNR). Diagnostic performance of all models was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The model was internally validated using 1000 bootstrap samples. Results A total of 582 participants were included in this study (median age, 64 years; IQR, 52-72 years; 274 female participants). There were 364 participants in the steatosis group and 218 in the nonsteatosis group. The AUC values for steatosis diagnosis in models 1-4 were 0.92, 0.93, 0.95, and 0.96, respectively. The C-indexes of models adjusted by the bootstrap method were 0.92, 0.93, 0.95, and 0.96, respectively. Compared with other models, models 3 and 4 demonstrated improved discrimination of at least 5% steatosis (P < .01). Conclusion A model built using the quantitative US parameters UGAP, IBSC, and SNR could accurately discriminate at least 5% steatosis in patients with CLD. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Han in this issue.

From NAFLD to HCC: Advances in noninvasive diagnosis

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has gradually become one of the major liver health problems in the world. The dynamic course of the disease goes through steatosis, inflammation, fibrosis, and carcinoma. Before progressing to carcinoma, timely and effective intervention will make the condition better, which highlights the importance of early diagnosis. With the further study of the biological mechanism in the pathogenesis and progression of NAFLD, some potential biomarkers have been discovered, and the possibility of their clinical application is gradually being discussed. At the same time, the progress of imaging technology and the emergence of new materials and methods also provide more possibilities for the diagnosis of NAFLD. This article reviews the diagnostic markers and advanced diagnostic methods of NAFLD in recent years.

Non-Invasive Imaging Methods to Evaluate Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease with Fat Quantification: A Review

Hepatic steatosis without specific causes (e.g., viral infection, alcohol abuse, etc.) is called non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which ranges from non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), fibrosis, and NASH-related cirrhosis. Despite the usefulness of the standard grading system, liver biopsy has several limitations. In addition, patient acceptability and intra- and inter-observer reproducibility are also concerns. Due to the prevalence of NAFLD and limitations of liver biopsies, non-invasive imaging methods such as ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that can reliably diagnose hepatic steatosis have developed rapidly. US is widely available and radiation-free but cannot examine the entire liver. CT is readily available and helpful for detection and risk classification, significantly when analyzed using artificial intelligence; however, it exposes users to radiation. Although expensive and time-consuming, MRI can measure liver fat percentage with magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF). Specifically, chemical shift-encoded (CSE)-MRI is the best imaging indicator for early liver fat detection. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of each imaging modality with an emphasis on the recent progress and current status of liver fat quantification.

Non-invasive evaluation of liver steatosis with imaging modalities: New techniques and applications

In the world, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) accounts for majority of diffuse hepatic diseases. Notably, substantial liver fat accumulation can trigger and accelerate hepatic fibrosis, thus contributing to disease progression. Moreover, the presence of NAFLD not only puts adverse influences for liver but is also associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, early detection and quantified measurement of hepatic fat content are of great importance. Liver biopsy is currently the most accurate method for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis. However, liver biopsy has several limitations, namely, its invasiveness, sampling error, high cost and moderate intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility. Recently, various quantitative imaging techniques have been developed for the diagnosis and quantified measurement of hepatic fat content, including ultrasound- or magnetic resonance-based methods. These quantitative imaging techniques can provide objective continuous metrics associated with liver fat content and be recorded for comparison when patients receive check-ups to evaluate changes in liver fat content, which is useful for longitudinal follow-up. In this review, we introduce several imaging techniques and describe their diagnostic performance for the diagnosis and quantified measurement of hepatic fat content.

Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: What Do We Know in 2023?

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a chronic liver disease associated with the pathological accumulation of lipids inside hepatocytes. Untreated NAFL can progress to non-alcoholic hepatitis (NASH), followed by fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The common denominator of the above-mentioned metabolic disorders seems to be insulin resistance, which occurs in NAFLD patients. Obesity is the greatest risk factor for lipid accumulation inside hepatocytes, but a part of the NAFLD patient population has a normal body weight according to the BMI index. Obese people with or without NAFLD have a higher incidence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), and those suffering from NAFLD show increased intestinal permeability, including a more frequent presence of bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine (SIBO). The health consequences of SIBO are primarily malabsorption disorders (vitamin B12, iron, choline, fats, carbohydrates and proteins) and bile salt deconjugation. Undetected and untreated SIBO may lead to nutrient and/or energy malnutrition, thus directly impairing liver function (e.g., folic acid and choline deficiency). However, whether SIBO contributes to liver dysfunction, decreased intestinal barrier integrity, increased inflammation, endotoxemia and bacterial translocation is not yet clear. In this review, we focus on gut–liver axis and discuss critical points, novel insights and the role of nutrition, lifestyle, pre- and probiotics, medication and supplements in the therapy and prevention of both SIBO and NAFLD.

Non-invasive imaging biomarkers for liver steatosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: present and future

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is currently the most common chronic liver disease, affecting up to 25% of the global population. Simple fatty liver, in which fat is deposited in the liver without fibrosis, has been regarded as a benign disease in the past, but it is now known to be prognostic. In the future, more emphasis should be placed on the quantification of liver fat. Traditionally, fatty liver has been assessed by histological evaluation, which requires an invasive examination; however, technological innovations have made it possible to evaluate fatty liver by non-invasive imaging methods, such as ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. In addition, quantitative as well as qualitative measurements for the detection of fatty liver have become available. In this review, we summarize the currently used qualitative evaluations of fatty liver and discuss quantitative evaluations that are expected to further develop in the future.

Deep attenuation transducer to measure liver stiffness in obese patients with liver disease

PURPOSE

Deep attenuation transducers (DAX) are capable of imaging at diagnostic depths of up to 40 cm. The feasibility of DAX for liver stiffness measurement (LSM) has not been reported clinically. We aimed to assess the feasibility and reliability of DAX for LSM.

METHODS

Overall, 219 patients with chronic liver disease were enrolled. The success rate (acquired after ≥ 10 valid measurements) and inadequate measurements (interquartile range/median ≥ 0.3) for DAX were compared with those of conventional convex (c-convex) probes and M and XL probes of vibration-controlled transient elastography.

RESULTS

LSM was successfully performed for all patients using DAX through all degrees of skin-to-liver capsular distance (SCD). Especially in patients with an SCD ≥ 30 mm, the difference in the rate of acquisition of 10 valid measurements was remarkable: M probe (8/33, 24.2%), XL probe (26/33, 78.8%), c-convex probe (33/43, 76.7%), and DAX (44/44, 100%). In patients with an SCD ≥ 30 mm, the inadequate measurement rate of M probe (1/8, 12.5%), XL probe (8/26, 30.8%), and c-convex probe (6/33, 18.2%) was higher than that of DAX (1/43, 2.3%). The areas under the curve for diagnosis of F4 with shear wave speed by c-convex and DAX were 0.916 and 0.918, respectively. Between DAX and c-convex probes, the intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.937 (95% CI 0.918-0.952) was excellent. Bland-Altman plots revealed that there was no statistically significant bias.

CONCLUSION

Liver stiffness measured by DAX is feasible and reliable for all patient populations, while the XL probe is limited to use in obese patients.

Ultrasound-Based Diagnostic Methods: Possible Use in Fatty Liver Disease Area

Liver steatosis is a chronic liver disease that is becoming one of the most important global health problems, due to its direct connection with metabolic syndrome, its significant impact on patients' socioeconomic status and frailty, and the occurrence of advanced chronic liver disease. In recent years, there has been rapid technological progress in the ultrasound-based diagnostics field that can help us to quantitatively assess liver steatosis, including continuous attenuation parameters in A and B ultrasound modes, backscatter coefficients (e.g., speed of sound) and ultrasound envelope statistic parametric imaging. The methods used in this field are widely available, have favorable time and financial profiles, and are well accepted by patients. Less is known about their reliability in defining the presence and degree of liver steatosis. Numerous study reports have shown the methods' favorable negative and positive predictive values in comparison with reference investigations (liver biopsy and MRI). Important research has also evaluated the role of these methods in diagnosing and monitoring non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Since NAFLD is becoming the dominant global cause of liver cirrhosis, and due to the close but complex interplay of liver steatosis with the coexistence of liver fibrosis, knowledge regarding NAFLD's influence on the progression of liver fibrosis is of crucial importance. Study findings, therefore, indicate the possibility of using these same diagnostic methods to evaluate the impact of NAFLD on the patient's liver fibrosis progression risk, metabolic risk factors, cardiovascular complications, and the occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. The mentioned areas are particularly important in light of the fact that most of the known chronic liver disease etiologies are increasingly intertwined with the simultaneous presence of NAFLD.

Ultrasound Methods for the Assessment of Liver Steatosis: A Critical Appraisal

The prevalence of the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease has reached major proportions, being estimated to affect one-quarter of the global population. The reference techniques, which include liver biopsy and the magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction, have objective practical and financial limitations to their routine use in the detection and quantification of liver steatosis. Therefore, there has been a rising necessity for the development of new inexpensive, widely applicable and reliable non-invasive diagnostic tools. The controlled attenuation parameter has been considered the point-of-care technique for the assessment of liver steatosis for a long period of time. Recently, many ultrasound (US) system manufacturers have developed proprietary software solutions for the quantification of liver steatosis. Some of these methods have already been extensively tested with very good performance results reported, while others are still under evaluation. This manuscript reviews the currently available US-based methods for diagnosing and grading liver steatosis, including their classification and performance results, with an appraisal of the importance of this armamentarium in daily clinical practice.

Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis and its clinical significance in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Liver fibrosis is the most important prognostic factor in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Several noninvasive markers for fibrosis, including blood-based markers and imaging based-markers have been developed. Indirect fibrosis markers (e.g., fibrosis-4 index and NAFLD fibrosis score) consist of standard laboratory data and clinical parameters. Given its availability and high negative predictive value for advanced fibrosis, these markers are suitable for screening at primary care. Blood-based fibrogenesis markers (enhanced liver fibrosis and N-terminal propeptide of type 3 collagen), ultrasound-based modalities (vibration-controlled transient elastography, point shear wave elastography [SWE], and two-dimensional SWE), and magnetic resonance elastography have high diagnostic accuracy for liver fibrosis and are suitable for diagnosing liver fibrosis at secondary care centers. Sequential use of these markers can increase diagnostic accuracy and reduce health care costs. Furthermore, combining noninvasive makers may assist in identifying candidates for pharmacological trials and reducing screening failure. Emerging data suggest that these noninvasive markers are associated with liver-related events (hepatocellular carcinoma and decompensation) and mortality. Furthermore, delta change in noninvasive markers over time is also associated with time-course change in fibrosis, liver-related event risk, and mortality risk. However, the association between liver fibrosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk is still controversial. CVD risk may decrease in patients with decompensated liver disease and noninvasive markers may be useful for assessing CVD risk in these patients. Therefore, noninvasive markers may be utilized as measures of fibrosis as well as real-time prognostic tools, in place of liver biopsy.

Reproducibility of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) to the noninvasive evaluation of hepatic steatosis

The aim of this study was to identify the applicability of an ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) for the noninvasive assessment of hepatic steatosis in clinical practice and to compare its correlation with B-mode ultrasound (US). From May to July 2021, 63 subjects with different body mass index (BMI) grades were included in the prospective study. All of them performed UGAP measurements, under different breathing manipulations, positions, diet statuses, and operators. After that, the UGAP values were compared with the visual grades of hepatic steatosis on B-mode US using a 4-point scale method. The intraclass correlation (ICC) of the UGAP values between the two radiologists was 0.862 (p < 0.001), and the ICCs of the UGAP values on the same day and different days by radiologist A were 0.899 (p < 0.001) and 0.910 (p < 0.001), respectively. There were no significant differences in UGAP values under different breathing manipulations (p > 0.05), positions (p > 0.05), or diet statuses (p = 0.300). The UGAP values in the fasting (supine position, segment V, 1) condition among the lean (BMI < 24 kg/m²), overweight (24 kg/m² ≤ BMI < 28 kg/m²) and obese groups (BMI ≥ 28 kg/m²) were 0.60 ± 0.12, 0.66 ± 0.14, and 0.71 ± 0.11 dB/cm/MHz, respectively, with a significant difference (p = 0.006). The correlation coefficients (Rho) between the UGAP values and the visual grades of hepatic steatosis by the two reviewers were 0.845 (p < 0.001) and 0.850 (p < 0.001), corresponding to a strong relationship. Steatosis grades by reviewer 1 (p = 0.036) and reviewer 2 (p = 0.003) were significant factors determining the UGAP values according to the multivariate linear regression analysis. UGAP demonstrated excellent intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the assessment of hepatic steatosis. UGAP may be a promising tool in clinical practice to predict hepatic steatosis.