1
|
Schol J, Huang IH, Carbone F, Fernandez LMB, Gourcerol G, Ho V, Kohn G, Lacy BE, Colombo AL, Miwa H, Moshiree B, Nguyen L, O'Grady G, Siah KTH, Stanghellini V, Tack J. Rome Foundation and international neurogastroenterology and motility societies' consensus on idiopathic gastroparesis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2025; 10:68-81. [PMID: 39674226 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(24)00284-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2024] [Revised: 08/25/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 12/16/2024]
Abstract
To establish a consensus on the definition and management of idiopathic gastroparesis, international experts (selected by neurogastroenterology and motility societies and initiated by the Rome Foundation) devised 144 statements using the Delphi method, with at least 80% agreement required. This consensus defined idiopathic gastroparesis as the presence of symptoms associated with delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Nausea and vomiting were identified as cardinal symptoms. Frequently co-existing symptoms are early satiation and postprandial fullness. Diagnosis requires the presence of these symptoms alongside delayed gastric emptying, measured by a 4 h scintigraphy or gastric emptying breath test of a mixed composition meal in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Therapeutic options with proven efficacy were sparse. Dietary adjustments, nutritional support (per guidelines from the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism for substantial weight loss or intractable vomiting), and opioid cessation were recommended by a consensus opinion. Antiemetic and prokinetic agents were also considered potentially beneficial. This consensus offers a global perspective on idiopathic gastroparesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jolien Schol
- Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - I-Hsuan Huang
- Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Florencia Carbone
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Guillaume Gourcerol
- Department of Physiology, UMR INSERM 1073 & CIC INSERM 1404, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Vincent Ho
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Geoffrey Kohn
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Brian E Lacy
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Aurelio Lopez Colombo
- UMAE, Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional Manuel Avila Camacho, Puebla, Mexico
| | - Hiroto Miwa
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kawanishi City Medical Center, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Baha Moshiree
- Atrium Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Wake Forest Medical University, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Linda Nguyen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Greg O'Grady
- Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Kewin T H Siah
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medicine Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore; Department of Internal Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Vincenzo Stanghellini
- Division of Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Jan Tack
- Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Carlin JL, Polymeropoulos C, Camilleri M, Lembo A, Fisher M, Kupersmith C, Madonick D, Moszczynski P, Smieszek S, Xiao C, Birznieks G, Polymeropoulos MH. The Efficacy of Tradipitant in Patients With Diabetic and Idiopathic Gastroparesis in a Phase 3 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22:2506-2516. [PMID: 38237696 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neurokinin receptor 1 antagonists are effective in reducing nausea and vomiting in chemotherapy-induced emesis. We investigated the safety and efficacy of tradipitant, a neurokinin receptor 1 antagonist, in patients with idiopathic and diabetic gastroparesis. METHODS A total of 201 adults with gastroparesis were randomly assigned to oral tradipitant 85 mg (n = 102) or placebo (n = 99) twice daily for 12 weeks. Symptoms were assessed by a daily symptom dairy, Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index scores, and other patient-reported questionnaires. Blood levels were monitored for an exposure-response analysis. The primary outcome was change from baseline to week 12 in average nausea severity, measured by daily symptom diary. RESULTS The intention-to-treat (ITT) population did not meet the prespecified primary endpoint at week 12 (difference in nausea severity change drug vs placebo; P = .741) or prespecified secondary endpoints. Post hoc analyses were performed to control for drug exposure, rescue medications, and baseline severity inflation. Subjects with high blood levels of tradipitant significantly improved average nausea severity beginning at early time points (weeks 2-4). In post hoc sensitivity analyses, tradipitant treatment demonstrated strengthened effects, with statistically significant improvements in nausea at week 12. CONCLUSIONS Although tradipitant did not reach significance in the ITT population, a pharmacokinetic exposure-response analysis demonstrated significant effects with adequate tradipitant exposure. When accounting for confounding factors such as baseline severity inflation and rescue medication, a statistically significant effect was also observed. These findings suggest that tradipitant has potential as a treatment for the symptom of nausea in gastroparesis. (ClincialTrials.gov, Number: NCT04028492).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michael Camilleri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Anthony Lembo
- Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Song G, Sclocco R, Sharma A, Guerrero-López I, Kuo B. Electroceuticals and Magnetoceuticals in Gastroenterology. Biomolecules 2024; 14:760. [PMID: 39062474 PMCID: PMC11275046 DOI: 10.3390/biom14070760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Revised: 06/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
In the realm of gastroenterology, the inadequacy of current medical treatments for gastrointestinal (GI) motility disorders and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), coupled with their potential side effects, necessitates novel therapeutic approaches. Neuromodulation, targeting the nervous system's control of GI functions, emerges as a promising alternative. This review explores the promising effects of vagal nerve stimulation (VNS), magnetic neuromodulation, and acupuncture in managing these challenging conditions. VNS offers targeted modulation of GI motility and inflammation, presenting a potential solution for patients not fully relieved from traditional medications. Magnetic neuromodulation, through non-invasive means, aims to enhance neurophysiological processes, showing promise in improving GI function and reducing inflammation. Acupuncture and electroacupuncture, grounded in traditional medicine yet validated by modern science, exert comprehensive effects on GI physiology via neuro-immune-endocrine mechanisms, offering relief from motility and inflammatory symptoms. This review highlights the need for further research to refine these interventions, emphasizing their prospective role in advancing patient-specific management strategies for GI motility disorders and IBD, thus paving the way for a new therapeutic paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gengqing Song
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44109, USA;
| | - Roberta Sclocco
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA;
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Amol Sharma
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA;
| | - Ingrid Guerrero-López
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, 08500 Vic, Spain;
| | - Braden Kuo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bor S, Kalkan İH, Savarino E, Rao S, Tack J, Pasricha J, Cangemi D, Schol J, Karunaratne T, Ghisa M, Ahuja NK, Lacy B. Prokinetics-safety and efficacy: The European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility/The American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society expert review. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2024; 36:e14774. [PMID: 38462678 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prokinetics are a class of pharmacological drugs designed to improve gastrointestinal (GI) motility, either regionally or across the whole gut. Each drug has its merits and drawbacks, and based on current evidence as high-quality studies are limited, we have no clear recommendation on one class or other. However, there remains a large unmet need for both regionally selective and/or globally acting prokinetic drugs that work primarily intraluminally and are safe and without systemic side effects. PURPOSE Here, we describe the strengths and weaknesses of six classes of prokinetic drugs, including their pharmacokinetic properties, efficacy, safety and tolerability and potential indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serhat Bor
- Division of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine & Ege Reflux Study Group, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - İsmail H Kalkan
- Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova (AOUP), Padua, Italy
| | - Satish Rao
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Health Center, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jan Tack
- Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jay Pasricha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - David Cangemi
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Jolien Schol
- Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tennekon Karunaratne
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Matteo Ghisa
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Nitin K Ahuja
- Division of Gastroenterology, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Brian Lacy
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Gastroparesis (GP) is a syndrome defined by symptoms and delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Typical symptoms include nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and early satiety. Only one medication is currently FDA-approved for the treatment of GP. This review highlights recent research findings pertaining to GP and provides evidence to support a change in the current GP diagnostic and treatment paradigm. RECENT FINDINGS An analysis of GP trials over the past four decades demonstrates the power of placebo and the need to perform longer studies with clearly defined patient populations. Two studies highlight the need to evaluate patients with suspected GP carefully and to perform gastric emptying studies properly. The misdiagnosis of GP symptoms is reviewed, preceded by a discussion of whether GP should be considered a disorder of gut-brain interaction. Finally, new data on therapies that target the pylorus are highlighted. SUMMARY Gastroparesis is frequently over-diagnosed and incorrectly diagnosed. Performing a proper gastric emptying study which adheres to standard protocol, and accurately interpreting the results in the context of the individual patient, are critical to making an accurate diagnosis of GP. The treatment paradigm needs to shift from simply aiming to accelerate gastric emptying to treating global symptoms of a chronic syndrome that may represent gut-brain dysfunction in many patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian E Lacy
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Journey L Wise
- Graduate Research Education Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - David J Cangemi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|