1
|
Akyirem S, Ekpor E, Batten J, Brady V. Reducing health-related stigma in adults living with chronic non-communicable diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med 2024; 356:117153. [PMID: 39047518 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Revised: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize the components of interventions that are aimed at reducing stigma among adults living with chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs). A secondary objective was to assess the effectiveness of interventions in reducing health-related stigma. METHODS A search was conducted on OVID MEDLINE, OVID APA PsycINFO, EBSCO CINAHL Complete, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central in July 2023 for articles that report the development and/or testing of health-related stigma-reduction interventions among adults with NCDs. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists. Intervention components were narratively synthesized. The DerSimonian-Laird random effect model was used to pool standardized mean differences across studies. RESULTS Nineteen articles were included in the review. Interventions addressed individual level (intrapersonal and interpersonal) and structural level stigmas. Components of intrapersonal interventions included cognitive exercises, stress reduction, promoting self-efficacy, developing communication skills, and listening to other patients' stories. Contact-based interventions were used in many interpersonal interventions. Structural interventions included mass media campaigns and training for healthcare professionals. Pooled intervention effects indicated a significant reduction in stigma levels post-intervention for both persons with NCD (Hedge's g = -1.13; 95% CI: 1.66, -0.60, I2 = 85%, N = 6 studies) and those without (Hedge's g = -2.45, 95% -4.84, -0.06; I2 = 97%, N = 2 studies). CONCLUSION Interventions to address NCD stigma, although multifaceted, are often not multilevel. Future studies are needed to design and test multilevel NCD stigma-reduction interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Akyirem
- Yale University, School of Nursing, 400 West Campus Drive, USA.
| | | | - Janene Batten
- Harvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library, Yale University, 333 Cedar St., New Haven, CT, 06520-8014, USA
| | - Veronica Brady
- Cizik School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zheng S, Liu S, Yang Q, Chan S, Huang W, Jiang X, Zhu J. The effectiveness of interventions to reduce cancer-related stigma: An integrative review. J Clin Nurs 2024; 33:2438-2455. [PMID: 38345136 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.17014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
AIMS The clinical significance of cancer-related stigma on patients' well-being has been widely established. Stigma can be perceived and internalised by cancer patients or implemented by the general population and healthcare workers. Various interventions have been carried out to reduce cancer-related stigma, but their effectiveness is not well-understood. This review aims to synthesise evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to reduce cancer-related stigma. DESIGN An integrative review. METHODS This integrative review combined both qualitative and quantitative studies and followed five steps to identify problems, search for the literature, appraise the literature quality, analyse data, and present data. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (version 2018) was applied to evaluate the quality of the included studies. DATA SOURCES Databases included Web of Science, MEDLINE, SpringerLink, Wiley Online Journals, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, OVID, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (from the inception of each database to 30 April 2021). RESULTS Eighteen quantitative, six qualitative, and five mixed-methods studies were included in this review. Cultural factors should be considered when conducting interventions to reduce cancer-related stigma. For cancer patients, multi-component interventions have demonstrated a positive effect on their perceived stigma. For general population, interactive interventions show promise to reduce their implemented stigma towards cancer patients. For healthcare workers, there is a paucity of studies to reduce their implemented stigma. Existing studies reported inconclusive evidence, partially due to the lack of a robust study design with an adequate sample size. CONCLUSIONS Multi-component and interactive interventions show promise to relieve cancer-related stigma. More methodologically robust studies should be conducted in different cultures to elucidate the most appropriate interventions for different populations to reduce cancer-related stigma. IMPLICATION FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE These findings will facilitate healthcare workers to design and implement interventions to reduce cancer-related stigma, thus improving the quality of life for cancer patients. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION No patient and public contribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang Zheng
- School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Shengjie Liu
- School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
- Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, China
| | - Qingmo Yang
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Sally Chan
- President Office, Tung Wah College, Hong Kong, China
| | - Wenhe Huang
- Cancer Center, Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Xiang'an Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Xiaoying Jiang
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jiemin Zhu
- Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
- Cancer Care Research Unit, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Banerjee SC, Parker PA, Staley JM, Manna R, Mahoney C, Liberman L. Mentor communication skills training: development, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 24:646. [PMID: 38858656 PMCID: PMC11165731 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05616-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mentoring is vital to career development in academic medicine, and communication underlies all aspects of the mentoring relationship. Although training research mentors has been shown to be effective, few academic medicine faculties have received training in how to mentor. The investigators developed a novel intervention, the Mentor Communication Skills Training for Oncology Faculty ("Comskil Mentor Training") and examined feasibility and preliminary efficacy. METHODS The study was a single arm pre-post intervention design. The intervention (Comskil Mentor Training) was offered in one virtual 3-hour session and included a didactic lecture with exemplary skill demonstration videos, facilitator-led small group role plays with trained actors, and evaluation. 19 faculty members from 12 departments participated in the training. RESULTS All participants completed the training. Overall, the training was rated favorably, with more than 80% of participants indicating that they "agreed" or "strongly agreed" with training evaluation. From pre- to post-training, significant improvement was seen in participants' overall self-efficacy to communicate with mentees, as well as participants' overall use of communication skills and mentoring-specific language. CONCLUSIONS Our findings support the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a virtually delivered experiential mentor communication skills training program for multidisciplinary clinical and research faculty in oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smita C Banerjee
- Associate Attending Behavioral Scientist, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 3rd Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, 10017, USA.
| | - Patricia A Parker
- Associate Attending Behavioral Scientist, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 3rd Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, 10017, USA
| | - Jessica M Staley
- Associate Attending Behavioral Scientist, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 3rd Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, 10017, USA
| | - Ruth Manna
- Associate Attending Behavioral Scientist, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 3rd Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, 10017, USA
| | - Cassidy Mahoney
- Associate Attending Behavioral Scientist, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 3rd Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, 10017, USA
| | - Laura Liberman
- Associate Attending Behavioral Scientist, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 3rd Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, 10017, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Heley K, Vanderpool RC, Vedham V. Global cancer stigma research: a U.S. National Cancer Institute workshop report. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2024; 2024:4-10. [PMID: 38836530 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Stigma is a social process characterized by negative beliefs, attitudes, and stereotypes associated with a specific attribute or characteristic that leads to discrimination and social exclusion. Stigma manifests across the cancer control continuum and remains a key challenge for cancer prevention and control worldwide. In this commentary, we provide an overview of the U.S. National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Global Cancer Stigma Research Workshop, a multi-disciplinary international conference held virtually in September 2022, which focused on the intersection of cancer and stigma. The meeting was unique in its convening of researchers, advocates, clinicians, and non-governmental and governmental organizations, who-as a collective-provided overarching topics, cross-cutting considerations, and future directions for the cancer stigma research community to consider, which we describe herein. In summary, studying cancer stigma comprehensively requires a holistic, adaptive, and multifaceted approach-and should consider interrelated factors and their intersection within diverse cultural and social contexts worldwide. Collectively, there was a call for: an inclusive approach, encouraging researchers and practitioners to identify and measure cancer stigma as a driver for cancer health inequities globally; an expansion of existing research methodology to include diversity of experiences, contexts, and perspectives; and collaborations among diverse stakeholders to develop more effective strategies for reducing stigma and improving cancer outcomes. Such efforts are essential to cultivating effective and equitable approaches to preventing and treating cancer worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Heley
- Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Robin C Vanderpool
- Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Vidya Vedham
- Center for Global Health, Office of the Director, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Banerjee SC, Asuzu C, Mapayi B, Olunloyo B, Odiaka E, Daramola OB, Gilliland J, Owoade IA, Kingham P, Alatise OI, Fitzgerald G, Kahn R, Olcese C, Ostroff JS. Feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of empathic communication skills training to reduce lung cancer stigma in Nigeria: a pilot study. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2024; 2024:30-37. [PMID: 38836528 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Effective communication about cancer diagnosis and prognosis in sub-Saharan African oncology settings is often challenged by the cancer-related shame and stigma patients and families experience. Enhancing empathic communication between health care providers, including physicians and nurses, and oncology patients and their families can not only reduce cancer stigma but also improve patient engagement, treatment satisfaction, and quality of life. To reduce lung cancer stigma, we adapted an evidence-based empathic communication skills training intervention to reduce patients' experience of stigma in Nigeria and conducted a pilot study examining the feasibility and acceptability of the empathic communication skills training. Thirty health care providers, recruited from University College Hospital, Ibadan, and Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, participated in a 2.25-hour didactic and experiential training session. Participant surveys were completed before and after the training. Overall, participants reported highly favorable training evaluations, with at least 85% of health care providers agreeing or strongly agreeing to survey items assessing training relevance, novelty, clarity, and facilitator effectiveness. Self-efficacy to communicate empathically with patients increased significantly from before-training (Mean [SD] = 3.93 [0.28]) to after-training (Mean [SD] = 4.55 [0.15]; t29 = 3.51, P < .05). Significant improvements were observed in health care provider reports of empathy toward lung cancer survivors and attitude toward lung cancer care as well as significant reductions in lung cancer blame were noted. The empathic communication skills training was feasible, well received by oncology clinicians in Nigeria, and demonstrated improvements in health care provider-reported outcomes from before- to after-training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smita C Banerjee
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chioma Asuzu
- Psycho-oncology Unit, Department of Radiotherapy, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Boladale Mapayi
- Department of Mental Health, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
| | - Blessing Olunloyo
- Psycho-oncology Unit, Department of Radiotherapy, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Emeka Odiaka
- Psycho-oncology Unit, Department of Radiotherapy, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Oluwafemi B Daramola
- African Research Group for Oncology, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
| | - Jaime Gilliland
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Israel Adeyemi Owoade
- African Research Group for Oncology, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
| | - Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Olusegun I Alatise
- African Research Group for Oncology, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
- Department of Surgery, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
| | - Grace Fitzgerald
- Global Cancer Disparities Initiatives, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rivka Kahn
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cristina Olcese
- Global Cancer Disparities Initiatives, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jamie S Ostroff
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Studts JL, Deffendall CM, McCubbin SL, Hamann HA, Hoover K, Brymwitt WM, Williamson TJ. Examining evidence of lung cancer stigma among health-care trainees. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2024; 2024:20-29. [PMID: 38836527 PMCID: PMC11151328 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovations in lung cancer control and care have started to transform the landscape of lung cancer outcomes, but lung cancer stigma and biases have been implicated as a deterrent to realizing the promise of these innovations. Research has documented lung cancer stigma among the general public and lung cancer survivors (self-blame), as well as clinicians across many disciplines. However, studies have not explored lung cancer stigma in health-care trainees. These data seek to address that gap and inform efforts to prevent the emergence or mitigate the presence of lung cancer stigma among future clinicians. METHODS Using clinical vignettes and a 2x2 factorial design, this investigation evaluated the impact of a history of smoking (yes vs no) and cancer diagnosis (lung vs colorectal) on perceptions of the described patient among 2 groups of preclinical health-care trainees (medical = 94 and nursing = 138). A charitable giving paradigm also asked participants to donate provided funds to 1 of 2 cancer advocacy organizations: one serving the lung cancer community and one serving the colorectal cancer community. RESULTS In study 1, results revealed a consistent pattern of statistically significant and medium to large effect size differences regarding stigmatized perceptions (eg, higher stigmatizing behavior, increased pity, greater anger, and less helping) for individuals with a history of smoking but no reliable differences regarding cancer diagnosis. Analysis of data from nursing trainees in study 2 showed a similar pattern of statistically significant and medium to large effects pertaining to stigma behavior and perceptions of individuals who had a history of smoking depicted in the vignettes. The charitable giving paradigm did not identify any reliable difference between the groups in either study. CONCLUSIONS Findings revealed a consistent pattern of health-care trainee perceptions that varied by smoking status but much less evidence that the cancer diagnosis contributed to different perceptions. This suggests that efforts to integrate consideration of stigma and biases in health-care training needs to adopt an approach that seeks to mitigate or eliminate stigmatizing perceptions and behaviors toward individuals with a history of smoking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie L Studts
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | | | - Heidi A Hamann
- Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Hoover
- Population Health Shared Resource, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Whitney M Brymwitt
- Department of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Timothy J Williamson
- Department of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chansky K, Rigney M, King JC. Real-world analysis of the relationships between smoking, lung cancer stigma, and emotional functioning. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6702. [PMID: 38214107 PMCID: PMC10905230 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION People diagnosed with lung cancer experience high rates of distress, which can be compounded by the stigma of the disease. This study assessed a real-world population to understand patient-reported emotional functioning, types of stigma experienced, and relationship with smoking history. METHODS Questionnaires using validated survey tools assessing demographics, smoking history, stigma, and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Scale) were analyzed from 539 global participants in the Lung Cancer Registry between November 2019 and July 2022. The associations between smoking history and self-reported internalized and perceived stigma and constrained disclosure of lung cancer diagnosis, as well as the potential impact of stigma on emotional functioning, were examined using multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS Among the broad geographic mix of study participants, all types of lung cancer stigma were associated with decreased emotional functioning due to a combination of factors including depression, anxiety, stress, and irritability. Participants who reported a history of current or former smoking experienced higher levels of internalized stigma and perceived stigma. Constrained disclosure about a diagnosis was common, associated with decreased emotional functioning, and not related to a history of smoking. Smoking status itself was not associated with reduced emotional functioning, implicating the role of stigma in distress. CONCLUSIONS In this study, all types of lung cancer stigma were associated with clinically important decreases in emotional functioning. This impact was not dependent on smoking history. Internalized and perceived stigma were associated with the presence of a smoking history. These findings have implications for proper psychosocial care of people diagnosed with lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kari Chansky
- Chansky Consulting LLC Mercer IslandMercer IslandWashingtonUSA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer CenterSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wolf AMD, Oeffinger KC, Shih TYC, Walter LC, Church TR, Fontham ETH, Elkin EB, Etzioni RD, Guerra CE, Perkins RB, Kondo KK, Kratzer TB, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Dahut WL, Smith RA. Screening for lung cancer: 2023 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 2024; 74:50-81. [PMID: 37909877 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of mortality and person-years of life lost from cancer among US men and women. Early detection has been shown to be associated with reduced lung cancer mortality. Our objective was to update the American Cancer Society (ACS) 2013 lung cancer screening (LCS) guideline for adults at high risk for lung cancer. The guideline is intended to provide guidance for screening to health care providers and their patients who are at high risk for lung cancer due to a history of smoking. The ACS Guideline Development Group (GDG) utilized a systematic review of the LCS literature commissioned for the US Preventive Services Task Force 2021 LCS recommendation update; a second systematic review of lung cancer risk associated with years since quitting smoking (YSQ); literature published since 2021; two Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network-validated lung cancer models to assess the benefits and harms of screening; an epidemiologic and modeling analysis examining the effect of YSQ and aging on lung cancer risk; and an updated analysis of benefit-to-radiation-risk ratios from LCS and follow-up examinations. The GDG also examined disease burden data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Formulation of recommendations was based on the quality of the evidence and judgment (incorporating values and preferences) about the balance of benefits and harms. The GDG judged that the overall evidence was moderate and sufficient to support a strong recommendation for screening individuals who meet the eligibility criteria. LCS in men and women aged 50-80 years is associated with a reduction in lung cancer deaths across a range of study designs, and inferential evidence supports LCS for men and women older than 80 years who are in good health. The ACS recommends annual LCS with low-dose computed tomography for asymptomatic individuals aged 50-80 years who currently smoke or formerly smoked and have a ≥20 pack-year smoking history (strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence). Before the decision is made to initiate LCS, individuals should engage in a shared decision-making discussion with a qualified health professional. For individuals who formerly smoked, the number of YSQ is not an eligibility criterion to begin or to stop screening. Individuals who currently smoke should receive counseling to quit and be connected to cessation resources. Individuals with comorbid conditions that substantially limit life expectancy should not be screened. These recommendations should be considered by health care providers and adults at high risk for lung cancer in discussions about LCS. If fully implemented, these recommendations have a high likelihood of significantly reducing death and suffering from lung cancer in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M D Wolf
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Kevin C Oeffinger
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine and Duke Cancer Institute Center for Onco-Primary Care, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Tina Ya-Chen Shih
- David Geffen School of Medicine and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Louise C Walter
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Timothy R Church
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elizabeth T H Fontham
- Health Sciences Center, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Elena B Elkin
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ruth D Etzioni
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Carmen E Guerra
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rebecca B Perkins
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Karli K Kondo
- Early Cancer Detection Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Tyler B Kratzer
- Cancer Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | | | - Robert A Smith
- Early Cancer Detection Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wollney EN, Vasquez TS, Fisher CL, Armstrong MJ, Paige SR, Alpert J, Bylund CL. A systematic scoping review of patient and caregiver self-report measures of satisfaction with clinicians' communication. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 117:107976. [PMID: 37738791 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We conducted a systematic scoping review of self-report tools used to measure patient and/or caregiver satisfaction with clinician communication. Aims included identifying: 1) instruments that have been used to measure communication satisfaction, and 2) content of the communication items on measures. METHODS Two databases (PubMed and CINAHL) were searched for relevant studies. Eligibility included patient or caregiver self-report tools assessing satisfaction with clinicians' communication in a biomedical healthcare setting; and the stated purpose for using the measurement involved evaluating communication satisfaction and measures included more than one question about this. All data were charted in a form created by the authors. RESULTS Our search yielded a total of 4531 results screened as title and abstracts; 228 studies were screened in full text and 85 studies were included in the review. We found 53 different tools used to measure communication satisfaction among those 85 studies, including 29 previously used measures (e.g., FS-ICU-24, CAHPS), and 24 original measures developed by authors. Content of communication satisfaction items included satisfaction with content-specific communication, interpersonal communication skills of clinicians, communicating to set the right environment, and global communication satisfaction items. CONCLUSION There was high variability in the number of items and types of content on measures. Communication satisfaction should be better conceptualized to improve measurement, and more robust measures should be created to capture complex factors of communication satisfaction. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Creating a rigorous evaluation of satisfaction with clinician communication may help strengthen communication research and the assessment of communication interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Easton N Wollney
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| | - Taylor S Vasquez
- College of Journalism & Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Carla L Fisher
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program (CCPS), UF Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Melissa J Armstrong
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, UF Health, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Samantha R Paige
- Health & Wellness Solutions, Johnson & Johnson, Inc., New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Jordan Alpert
- Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Carma L Bylund
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program (CCPS), UF Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sheffer CE, Shevorykin A, Freitas-Lemos R, Vantucci D, Carl E, Bensch L, Marion M, Erwin DO, Smith PH, Williams JM, Ostroff JS. Advancing Proficiencies for Health Professionals in the Treatment of Tobacco Use Among Marginalized Communities: Development of a Competency-Based Curriculum and Virtual Workshop. Subst Abus 2023; 44:313-322. [PMID: 37842906 DOI: 10.1177/08897077231200987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tobacco-related disparities are a leading contributor to health inequities among marginalized communities. Lack of support from health professionals is one of the most cited barriers to tobacco cessation reported by these communities. Improving the proficiencies with which health professionals incorporate social and cultural influences into therapeutic interactions has the potential to address this critical barrier. In general, training to improve these proficiencies has shown promise, but the specific proficiencies required for treating tobacco use among marginalized communities are unknown. This project aimed to develop a competency-based curriculum to improve these proficiencies among health professionals with experience and training in the evidence-based treatment of tobacco use, and then pilot test the content delivered via an expert review of a virtual, self-paced workshop. METHODS We used the Delphi Technique to systematically identify the specific competencies and corresponding knowledge and skill sets required to achieve these proficiencies. Educational content was developed to teach these competencies in a virtual workshop. The workshop was evaluated by 11 experts in the field by examining pre- and post-training changes in perceived knowledge, skill, and confidence levels and other quantitative and qualitative feedback. Repeated measures analysis of variance and paired sample t-tests were used to examine pre-post training differences. RESULTS Six competencies and corresponding skill sets were identified. After exposure to the virtual workshop, the experts reported significant increases in the overall proficiency for each competency as well as increases in nearly all levels of knowledge, skill, and confidence within the competency skill sets. Qualitative and quantitative findings indicate that content was relevant to practice. CONCLUSIONS These findings provide preliminary support for 6 competencies and skills sets needed to improve therapeutic interpersonal interactions that recognize the importance of social and cultural influences in the treatment of tobacco use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine E Sheffer
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Alina Shevorykin
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | | | - Darian Vantucci
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Ellen Carl
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Lindsey Bensch
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Matthew Marion
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Deborah O Erwin
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Philip H Smith
- Department of Kinesiology, Nutrition and Health, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA
| | - Jill M Williams
- Department of Psychiatry, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Jamie S Ostroff
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Banerjee SC, Malling CD, Shen MJ, Williamson TJ, Bylund CL, Studts JL, Mullett T, Carter-Bawa L, Hamann HA, Parker PA, Steliga M, Feldman J, Pantelas J, Borondy-Kitts A, Rigney M, King JC, Fathi JT, Rosenthal LS, Smith RA, Ostroff JS. Getting ready for prime time: Recommended adaptations of an Empathic Communication Skills training intervention to reduce lung cancer stigma for a national multi-center trial. Transl Behav Med 2023; 13:804-808. [PMID: 37579304 PMCID: PMC10538471 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibad048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Building upon prior work developing and pilot testing a provider-focused Empathic Communication Skills (ECS) training intervention, this study sought feedback from key invested partners who work with individuals with lung cancer (i.e. stakeholders including scientific and clinical advisors and patient advocates) on the ECS training intervention. The findings will be used to launch a national virtually-delivered multi-center clinical trial that will examine the effectiveness and implementation of the evidence-based ECS training intervention to reduce patients' experience of lung cancer stigma. A 1-day, hybrid, key invested partners meeting was held in New York City in Fall 2021. We presented the ECS training intervention to all conference attendees (N = 25) to seek constructive feedback on modifications of the training content and platform for intervention delivery to maximize its impact. After participating in the immersive training, all participants engaged in a group discussion guided by semi-structured probes. A deductive thematic content analysis was conducted to code focus group responses into 12 distinct a priori content modification recommendations. Content refinement was suggested in 8 of the 12 content modification themes: tailoring/tweaking/refining, adding elements, removing elements, shortening/condensing content, lengthening/extending content, substituting elements, re-ordering elements, and repeating elements. Engagement and feedback from key invested multi-sector partner is a valuable resource for intervention content modifications. Using a structured format for refining evidence-based interventions can facilitate efforts to understand the nature of modifications required for scaling up interventions and the impact of these modifications on outcomes of interest. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05456841.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smita C Banerjee
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charlotte D Malling
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Megan J Shen
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Timothy J Williamson
- Department of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Carma L Bylund
- Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jamie L Studts
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Timothy Mullett
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, UK Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Lisa Carter-Bawa
- Cancer Prevention Precision Control Institute, Center for Discovery & Innovation at Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, NJ, USA
| | - Heidi A Hamann
- Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Patricia A Parker
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew Steliga
- Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Robert A Smith
- American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable, USA
| | - Jamie S Ostroff
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rosa WE, McDarby M, Buller H, Ferrell BR. Palliative Care Clinician Perspectives on Person-Centered End-of-Life Communication for Racially and Culturally Minoritized Persons with Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4076. [PMID: 37627105 PMCID: PMC10452546 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine interdisciplinary clinicians' perceptions of priorities in serious illness communication and shared decision-making with racially and culturally minoritized persons at end of life. Clinicians (N = 152) read a detailed case study about a patient self-identifying as Black and American Indian who describes mistrust of the healthcare system. Participants then responded to three open-ended questions about communication strategies and approaches they would employ in providing care. We conducted a thematic analysis of participants' responses to questions using an iterative, inductive approach. Interdisciplinary clinicians from nursing (48%), social work (36%), and chaplaincy (16%), responded to the study survey. A total of four themes emerged: (1) person-centered, authentic, and culturally-sensitive care; (2) pain control; (3) approaches to build trust and connection; and (4) understanding communication challenges related to racial differences. Significant efforts have been made to train clinicians in culturally inclusive communication, yet we know little about how clinicians approach "real world" scenarios during which patients from structurally minoritized groups describe care concerns. We outline implications for identifying unconscious bias, informing educational interventions to support culturally inclusive communication, and improving the quality of end-of-life care for patients with cancer from minoritized groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William E. Rosa
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10017, USA;
| | - Meghan McDarby
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10017, USA;
| | - Haley Buller
- City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA; (H.B.); (B.R.F.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fathi JT. Integration of Tobacco Dependence Treatment in Lung Cancer Screening and Other Ambulatory Care Settings. Respir Med 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-24914-3_9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
|
14
|
Dwyer LA, Epstein RM, Feeney BC, Blair IV, Bolger N, Ferrer RA. Responsive social support serves important functions in clinical communication: Translating perspectives from relationship science to improve cancer clinical interactions. Soc Sci Med 2022; 315:115521. [PMID: 36384086 PMCID: PMC9722606 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Patient-clinician interactions are critical to patient-centered care, including in cancer care contexts which are often defined by multiple patient-clinician interactions over an extended period. Research on these dyadic interactions has been guided by perspectives in clinical communication science, but the study of clinical communication has not been fully integrated with perspectives on interpersonal interactions from relationship science research. An overlapping concept in both fields is the concept of responsive socialsupport. In this article, we discuss responsiveness as a concept that offers opportunities for connections between these two disciplines. Next, we focus on how relationship science can be applied to research in clinical settings. We discuss how three areas of relationship science define responsiveness and have potential for extension to clinical communication: (1) (in)visibility of social support, (2) attachment orientations, and (3) shared meaning systems. We also discuss how social biases can impede responsiveness and suggest research avenues to develop ideas and understand potential challenges in connecting these two fields. Many opportunities exist for interdisciplinary theory development that can generate momentum in understanding interpersonal processes in cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ronald M Epstein
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Brooke C Feeney
- Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Irene V Blair
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Niall Bolger
- Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rebecca A Ferrer
- Basic Biobehavioral and Psychological Sciences Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ostroff JS, Banerjee SC, Lynch K, Shen MJ, Williamson TJ, Haque N, Riley K, Hamann HA, Rigney M, Park B. Reducing stigma triggered by assessing smoking status among patients diagnosed with lung cancer: De-stigmatizing do and don't lessons learned from qualitative interviews. PEC INNOVATION 2022; 1:100025. [PMID: 36865902 PMCID: PMC9977138 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Objective To characterize lung cancer patients' reactions to cancer care providers' (CCPs) assessment of smoking behavior and to develop recommendations to reduce stigma and improve patient-clinician communication about smoking in the context of lung cancer care. Methods Semi-structured interviews with 56 lung cancer patients (Study 1) and focus groups with 11 lung cancer patients (Study 2) were conducted and analyzed using thematic content analysis. Results Three broad themes were identified: cursory questions about smoking history and current behavior; stigma triggered by assessment of smoking behavior; and recommended dos and don'ts for CCPs treating patients with lung cancer. CCP communication that contributed to patients' comfort included responding in an empathic manner and using supportive verbal and non-verbal communication skills. Blaming statements, doubting patients' self-reported smoking status, insinuating subpar care, nihilistic statements, and avoidant behaviors contributed to patients' discomfort. Conclusions Patients often experienced stigma in response to smoking-related discussions with their CCPs and identified several communication strategies that CCPs can use to improve patients' comfort within these clinical encounters. Innovation These patient perspectives advance the field by providing specific communication recommendations that CCPs can adopt to mitigate stigma and enhance lung cancer patients' comfort, particularly when taking a routine smoking history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie S. Ostroff
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY, USA,Corresponding author at: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave., 7th Floor, New York, NY 10022, USA. (J.S. Ostroff)
| | - Smita C. Banerjee
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY, USA
| | - Kathleen Lynch
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY, USA
| | - Megan J. Shen
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY, NY, USA,Fred Hutchinson/University of Washington Cancer Center, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Timothy J. Williamson
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY, USA
| | - Noshin Haque
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY, USA
| | - Kristen Riley
- Rutgers Graduate School of Applied Psychology, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Heidi A. Hamann
- Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | - Bernard Park
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rosa WE, Cannity K, Moreno A, Cardillo C, Schofield EA, Korc-Grodzicki B, Parker PA, Manna R, Alici Y, Nelson C, Alexander K, Banerjee SC. Geriatrics communication skills training program for oncology healthcare providers to improve the management of care for older adults with cancer. PEC INNOVATION 2022; 1:100066. [PMID: 36741338 PMCID: PMC9894477 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Objective We evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a novel intervention, the Geriatric Communication Skills Training Program (Geriatric Comskil Training) for multidisciplinary healthcare providers (HCPs). Methods Three 2-h modules comprised the training: Geriatrics 101, Cognitive Syndromes, and Shared Decision-Making. Modules consisted of didactic knowledge, exemplary videos, and experiential learning role plays with standardized patients. We collected pre- and post-training data from 11 HCPs (module evaluations, self-efficacy, communication skills uptake in interaction with standardized patients, perceived ageism) and 44 patients (perceived HCP empathy, satisfaction with HCP communication). Results HCPs rated all modules high, with over 90% agreement on all course evaluation items assessing involvement, critical thinking, and reflectiveness, and significant improvements in self-efficacy. HCPs demonstrated an uptake in communication skills from pre- to post-training in agenda setting and overall skill use and reported promising trends towards lower ageism scores (d = 0.58). Promising trends in patient-reported HCP empathy (d = 0.39) and satisfaction with communication (d = 0.29) emerged from pre- to post-training. Conclusion Continued efforts are needed to strengthen HCP education related to geriatric communication across the cancer continuum. Innovation The Geriatric Comskil Training demonstrated feasibility, acceptability, and increases in self-efficacy and communication skills uptake for HCPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Aimee Moreno
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cara Cardillo
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Ruth Manna
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yesne Alici
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Smita C. Banerjee
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA,Corresponding author at: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave., 7th Floor, New York, NY 10022, USA., (S.C. Banerjee)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Price SN, Shen M, Rigney M, Ostroff JS, Hamann HA. Identifying Barriers to Advocacy Among Patients With Lung Cancer: The Role of Stigma-Related Interpersonal Constraint. Oncol Nurs Forum 2022; 49:553-563. [PMID: 36413734 PMCID: PMC10591268 DOI: 10.1188/22.onf.553-563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine whether aspects of disease-specific stigma are barriers to advocacy among individuals with lung cancer. SAMPLE & SETTING 266 patients with lung cancer treated at two National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer centers in the United States. METHODS & VARIABLES Patients completed a cross-sectional survey. Demographic, clinical, and stigma-related correlates of advocacy were also explored. RESULTS In multivariable analyses, lower levels of patient advocacy were reported by older patients and those with higher levels of constrained disclosure (i.e., avoidance of or discomfort in disclosing one's lung cancer status). IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING Avoidance of discussing lung cancer (constrained disclosure) may be a barrier to patient involvement in advocacy. Additional research is needed to examine this relationship, reduce stigma, and promote inclusivity for individuals with lung cancer.
Collapse
|
18
|
Liu M, Cai J, Chen H, Shi L. Association of Personality Traits with Life and Work of Medical Students: An Integrative Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:12376. [PMID: 36231679 PMCID: PMC9566667 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Personality traits are the basic components of an individual's personality. Although there are many published articles about the impact of personality traits on medical students, there is a lack of integrative reviews of existing articles. To close this gap, this review aims to summarize the impact of personality traits on medical students from two perspectives: life and work. METHODS The search was performed using the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and EMBASE. All publications that assessed the impact of personality traits on life and work until February 2022 were selected. RESULTS Ninety-seven studies were included. The results suggest that personality traits could affect life performance, health outcomes, life satisfaction, the formation of doctor-patient relationships, mastery of knowledge, academic performance, and career planning. Different personality traits can have positive or negative impacts on these aspects. CONCLUSIONS The results of this review suggest that personality traits can affect medical students' lives and work. Therefore, based on the evaluation of the personality traits of medical students, it is necessary to design targeted courses and training for students to improve their personality traits, to bring about better results in their lives and work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meichen Liu
- Modern Educational Technology Center, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China
| | - Jinquan Cai
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China
| | - Hao Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China
| | - Lei Shi
- School of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bylund CL. Understanding and improving empathy and emotion handling skills among medical students. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:2803-2804. [PMID: 35811258 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Carma L Bylund
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chen Z, He G, Zhao Y, Han C, Xu L, Jian H, Chu Q, He Y. Symptom burden and emotional distress in advanced lung cancer: the moderating effects of physicians' communication skills and patients' disease understanding. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:9497-9505. [PMID: 35971009 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07323-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The elevated physical symptom burden in advanced lung cancer can disrupt patients' emotional well-being, and current literature suggests that physicians' good communication skills might be a buffer. However, little is known about for which group of patients this buffering effect is most effective. Based on a cross-sectional study in patients with advanced lung cancer, the present study examined whether the moderating effect of physicians' communication skills on the association between physical symptoms and emotional distress would further depend on patients' perceived disease understanding. METHODS Patients with advanced lung cancer (n = 199) completed a questionnaire including measures of physical symptoms related to lung cancer, anxiety, and depressive symptoms, perceptions of physicians' communication skills, and self-reported understanding of their disease. RESULTS Hierarchical regression analyses indicated a significant three-way interaction among physical symptoms, perceptions of physicians' communication skills, and perceived disease understanding on both anxiety and depression. Specifically, physicians' good communication skills exerted a buffering effect only for patients with lower levels of disease understanding. CONCLUSION Our findings indicate that improving physicians' communication skills may be especially beneficial for reducing the maladaptive emotional reactions to symptom burden for patients with limited disease understanding. When time and resources for communication are restricted, enhanced awareness and focused training may be directed at communicating with patients who possess limited knowledge about their disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhonglin Chen
- Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Rd, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Gan He
- School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 227 South Chongqing Rd, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Yi Zhao
- Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Rd, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Chenyan Han
- Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Rd, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Lei Xu
- Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Rd, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Hong Jian
- Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Rd, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Qiao Chu
- School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 227 South Chongqing Rd, Shanghai, 200025, China.
| | - Yaping He
- School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 227 South Chongqing Rd, Shanghai, 200025, China. .,Center for Health Technology Assessment, Shanghai Jiao Tong University China Hospital Development Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 227 South Chongqing Rd, Shanghai, 200025, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Yang N, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Wang F, Yang G, Hu X. Influence of Social Workers' Empathy Ability on Suicidal Ideation of Cancer Patients. Front Public Health 2022; 10:925307. [PMID: 35968492 PMCID: PMC9364132 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.925307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The nursing goal of patients with cancer is to provide them with holistic care, including physical, psychological, and social adaptation, and spirituality. This research aimed to explore the influence of the social workers' empathy ability on suicidal ideation of patients with cancer and its path. Methods There was a sum of 358 patients with cancer and the 45 social workers serving them participated in the survey. Data of their self-efficacy, depression symptom, stigma, and suicidal ideation were measured before the social work provided (T1) and 3 months after the social work finished (T2) were collected and compared. Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess the relationships between social workers' empathy ability and patient indicators at T2. The influence path of social workers' empathy ability on cancer patients' suicidal ideation was explored by path analysis at T2. Results At T2, patients reported higher self-efficacy and lower depression symptoms, stigma, and suicidal ideation than at T1. At T2, social workers' empathy ability was positively related to patients' self-efficacy and was negatively related to depression symptoms, stigma, and suicidal ideation. Social workers' empathy ability affected patients' suicidal ideation directly. In addition, patients' self-efficacy, depression symptoms, and stigma played mediating roles in the influence of social workers' empathy abilities on their suicidal ideation. Conclusion Social workers' empathy ability not only directly affected cancer patients' suicide ideation but also affected suicide ideation through the mediating roles of self-efficacy, depression symptoms, and stigma. Therefore, the improvement of the empathy ability of medical social workers needs to be paid attention to.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ningxi Yang
- College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China
- Innovation Center of Nursing Research, Nursing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China School of Medicine/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yuting Zhang
- Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zhibo Liu
- College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China
| | - Fang Wang
- Innovation Center of Nursing Research, Nursing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China School of Medicine/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Guoqing Yang
- College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China
| | - Xiuying Hu
- Innovation Center of Nursing Research, Nursing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China School of Medicine/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rosa WE, Banerjee SC, Kastrinos AL, Parker PA. Empathic communication: The premise of inclusive care for historically excluded populations. Cancer 2022; 128:2836-2837. [PMID: 35471553 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- William E Rosa
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Smita C Banerjee
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Amanda L Kastrinos
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Patricia A Parker
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Williamson TJ, Garon EB, Shapiro JR, Chavira DA, Goldman JW, Stanton AL. Facets of stigma, self-compassion, and health-related adjustment to lung cancer: A longitudinal study. Health Psychol 2022; 41:301-310. [PMID: 35324247 PMCID: PMC9030259 DOI: 10.1037/hea0001156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate whether three facets of lung cancer stigma (internalized stigma, constrained disclosure, and perceived subtle discrimination) uniquely predicted psychological and physical health-related adjustment to lung cancer across 12 weeks. Additionally, self-compassion was tested as a moderator of the stigma-health relationship. METHOD Adults receiving oncologic treatment for lung cancer (N = 108) completed measures of lung cancer stigma, self-compassion, depressive symptoms, cancer-related stress, and physical symptom bother. Multivariable linear regression models were used to investigate cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships (at 6- and 12-week follow-up) between indicators of stigma and health-related outcomes, controlling for covariates. Self-compassion was tested as a moderator of these relationships. RESULTS At study entry, higher internalized stigma, constrained disclosure, and perceived subtle discrimination were associated significantly and uniquely with higher depressive symptoms (all p < .05). Constrained disclosure and perceived subtle discrimination were also associated significantly with higher cancer-related stress and higher physical symptom bother at study entry (all p < .05). Furthermore, higher internalized stigma predicted significant increases in depressive symptoms across 12 weeks and in cancer-related stress across 6 and 12 weeks (all p < .05). Higher self-compassion significantly moderated relationships between perceived discrimination and psychological health outcomes at study entry as well as between internalized stigma and increasing depressive symptoms across 12 weeks (all p < .05). CONCLUSIONS Results indicated robust relationships between distinct facets of stigma and health-related adjustment to lung cancer. Supportive care programs that bolster self-compassion may be useful for reducing lung cancer stigma. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J. Williamson
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
| | - Edward B. Garon
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Jenessa R. Shapiro
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles
- Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles
| | | | - Jonathan W. Goldman
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Annette L. Stanton
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Peng T, Hamann HA, David EA. Stigma May Exacerbate Disproportionately Low Guideline-Concordant Treatment Rates for Patients with Advanced Stage Lung Cancer in the United States. JTO Clin Res Rep 2022; 3:100302. [PMID: 35400082 PMCID: PMC8983342 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Terrance Peng
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Heidi A. Hamann
- Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Elizabeth A. David
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
- Corresponding author. Address for correspondence: Elizabeth A. David, MD, MAS, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo Street, HCC1 Suite 514, Los Angeles, CA 90033-4612.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
The Effects of Physicians' Communication and Empathy Ability on Physician-Patient Relationship from Physicians' and Patients' Perspectives. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2022; 29:849-860. [PMID: 35089529 PMCID: PMC8795960 DOI: 10.1007/s10880-022-09844-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Physician communication (PC) is central to influencing physician–patient relationship (PPR), and physician empathy (PE) is central to PC. A comprehensive and objective assessment of the mechanisms underlying PPR from the two-way perspective of physicians and patients are important for social development. However, the relationship between these three variables under the two-way perspective is not clear. To examine the effectiveness of PC in predicting PPR from a two-way perspective of physicians and patients and the underlying mechanisms that influence PPR. We selected 2665 physicians and 2983 patients in China and examined the effect of physician empathy on PPR and the mediating role of PC between PE and PPR using structural equation modeling. The results of the physician self-assessment showed that the link between PC and PPR was not significant, while the results of the patient other assessment showed that physician communication was not only effective in predicting the doctor–patient relationship but also mediated the relationship between physician empathy and PPR; further analysis of the underlying mechanisms affecting PPR revealed that the results of the physician self-assessment showed that PC mediated the relationship between perspective-taking and PPR; however, the results of the patient other assessment showed that physician However, patient ratings showed that PC mediated the relationship between perspective-taking and PPR, as well as between empathic concern and PPR. However, patient ratings indicate that PC mediates the relationship between perspective-taking and PPR and between empathic concern and the PPR.
Collapse
|
26
|
Rodgers-Melnick SN, Zanotti K, Lee RT, Webb Hooper M. Demographic and Clinical Predictors of Engaging in Tobacco Cessation Counseling at a Comprehensive Cancer Center. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e721-e730. [PMID: 34995104 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To address challenges promoting tobacco cessation in oncology settings, it is important to understand characteristics associated with patient engagement in tobacco cessation treatment. This analysis examined predictors of participating in at least one tobacco cessation counseling session among patients referred to a comprehensive cancer center's Tobacco Intervention and Psychosocial Support (TIPS) service. METHODS Patients with cancer who reported current smoking or recently quitting and referred to TIPS between June 2017 and February 2020 were included in the analysis. Independent variables included sex, race and ethnicity, insurance type, cancer diagnosis (tobacco-related or not), age, nicotine dependence, and cigarettes smoked per day at baseline. The outcome variable was completion of at least one tobacco cessation counseling session among those assessed by the TIPS program. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses tested associations between the independent variables and tobacco cessation counseling engagement. RESULTS Of 360 oncology patients referred to the TIPS program, 224 (62.2%) were assessed and 120 (33%) engaged in at least one counseling session. After controlling for sociodemographics and tobacco use, the results demonstrated that patients diagnosed with tobacco-related cancers were 45.3% less likely to engage in the tobacco cessation program compared with those with non-tobacco-related cancers (P = .041). CONCLUSION Patients diagnosed with tobacco-related cancers were less likely to engage in TIPS. Additional therapeutic resources may be needed to engage these patients to address potential explanatory factors, such as stigma, guilt, and fatalism. More research is needed to explore the impact of a tobacco-related cancer diagnosis on treatment engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel N Rodgers-Melnick
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.,University Hospitals Connor Whole Health, Cleveland, OH
| | - Kristine Zanotti
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.,Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Richard T Lee
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.,Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Monica Webb Hooper
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Significant disparities exist in lung cancer incidence and screening. Geographic, racial, gender, and socioeconomic disparities affect lung cancer incidence. As the leading cause of lung cancer, smoking varies among different racioethnic groups, genders, and socioeconomic statuses. In addition, environmental pollutants, such as radon, industrial toxins, and air pollution, are significant risk factors for lung cancer development that is disproportionately seen in working-class communities, as well as underserved and disabled populations. Lung cancer incidence depends on diagnosis. Literature examining lung cancer incidence and screening disparities have its limitations, as most studies are methodologically limited and do not adjust for important risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vignesh Raman
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | - Valeda Yong
- Surgery, Temple University Hospital, 3401 N. Broad Street, Zone C, 4th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA. https://twitter.com/ValedaYongMD
| | - Cherie P Erkmen
- Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Betty C Tong
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Scharnetzki L, Schiller JH. Lung Cancer: Why the Stigma? And What Can Be Done? Chest 2021; 159:1721-1722. [PMID: 33965131 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.12.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
|