Impact of Delays in Lung Cancer Treatment on Survival

The consecutive impact of COVID-19 on thoracic surgical procedures in Japan: an analysis of data from the National Clinical Database

PURPOSE

The current study was designed to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on general thoracic surgeries in Japan.

METHODS

Changes in surgeries for lung cancer and metastatic lung tumors were evaluated based on National Clinical Database data regarding cancer screening.

RESULTS

In 2021, surgeries for primary lung cancer increased by 3.4% compared to 2020, which, given the increase from 2014 to 2019, indicates an overall 11.1% decrease. In contrast, surgeries for metastatic lung tumors in 2021 decreased by 5.8% compared to 2020, which, given the increase from 2014 to 2020, indicates an overall 9.2% decrease. Half of the primary diseases for metastatic lung tumor were cases of colorectal cancer. Low anterior resection procedures in 2020 decreased by 5.5% compared to 2019. Lung and colon cancer screening examinees in 2021 were increased compared to 2020; however, they still showed respective decreases of 11% and 9.0% compared to 2019.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeries for primary lung cancer still decreased substantially during the COVID-19 pandemic. The continued stagnation of screening was responsible for this decrease. Surgeries for metastatic lung tumors decreased profoundly, and the decrease in screening for primary tumors was responsible for this reduction. Our findings emphasize the significance of maintaining cancer screening efforts, even during a pandemic.

Barriers to Timely Lung Cancer Care in Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Impact on Patient Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Optimal time to treatment for early-stage lung cancer is uncertain. We examined causes of delays in care for Veterans who presented with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and whether workup time was associated with increased upstaging or all-cause mortality.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of Veterans referred to our facility with radiographic stage I or II NSCLC between January 2013 to December 2017, with follow-up through October 2021. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, time intervals of care, and reasons for delays were collected. Guideline concordance (GC) was defined as treatment within 14 weeks of abnormal image. Multivariable analyses were performed to determine association between delays in care, survival, and upstaging.

RESULTS

Data from 203 Veterans were analyzed. Median time between abnormal imaging to treatment was 17.7 weeks (IQR 12.7-26.6). Only 33% of Veterans received GC care. Most common patient-related delays were: intercurrent hospitalization/comorbidity (23%), no-shows (16%) and inability to reach Veteran (17%). Most common system-related delay: lack of scheduling availability (25%). Delays associated with upstaging: transportation issues, request for coordination of appointments, and unforeseen appointment changes. Rates of upstaging did not differ between GC and discordant groups (P = .6). GC care was not an independent predictor of mortality. Post-hoc, treatment within 8 weeks was associated with lower rates of upstaging (P = .05).

CONCLUSION

Although GC care did not impact survival or upstaging for early-stage NSCLC, shorter timeframes may be beneficial. Modifiable delays in care exist which may be addressed at an institutional level to improve timeliness of care.

Compromised Outcomes in Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Actionable Mutations Initially Treated Without Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data

PURPOSE

Identification and targeting of actionable oncogenic drivers (AODs) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has dramatically improved outcomes. However, genomic testing uptake is variable and hampered by factors including slow turnaround time, frequently resulting in initial non-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. We investigate how this behavior affects outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of real-world, deidentified data from the Integra Connect Database included adults with stage IV NSCLC newly diagnosed from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020, with mutations of EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, MET, RET, ERBB2, or NTRK. Outcomes were reported as time to next treatment or death (TTNT) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Five hundred ten patients harboring AODs were identified and grouped as follows: group A (n = 379) were treated after the AOD was reported and served as the comparator. One hundred thirty-one patients treated before their AOD report were divided into group B (n = 47) who were initially started on chemotherapy and/or checkpoint inhibitor but switched to appropriate TKI within 35 days and group C (n = 84) who were also started empirically on non-TKI and did not switch within 35 days. Survival (OS) was significantly superior in group A compared with group C; TTNT was significantly superior in group A compared with groups B and C.

CONCLUSION

For patients harboring AODs in advanced NSCLC, initial treatment before receipt of genomic test results yields significantly inferior outcomes and should be avoided. Molecular profiling panels with rapid turnaround times are essential to optimize patient outcomes and should be standard of care.

Use of honokiol in lung cancer therapy: a mini review of its pharmacological mechanism

Honokiol (3',5-di-(2-propenyl)-1,1'-biphenyl-2,2'-diol) is a biologically active natural product derived from Magnolia and has been shown to have excellent biological activities. This paper discusses research progress on the use of honokiol in the treatment of lung cancer, as studies have confirmed that honokiol can exert anti-lung-cancer effects through multiple pathways and multiple signaling pathways, such as inhibiting angiogenesis, affecting mitochondrial function and apoptosis, regulating of autophagy and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). In addition, honokiol combined with other chemotherapy drugs is also a way in which it can be applied.

Factors leading to disparity in lung cancer diagnosis among black/African American communities in the USA: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

This study has two objectives: first, to explore the diagnostic experiences of black/African American (BAA) patients with lung cancer to pinpoint pitfalls, suboptimal experiences and instances of discrimination leading to disparities in outcomes compared with patients of other ethnic backgrounds, especially white patients. The second objective is to identify the underlying causes contributing to health disparities in the diagnosis of lung cancer among BAA patients.

METHODS

We employed a phenomenological research approach, guiding in-depth interviews with patients self-identifying as BAA diagnosed with lung cancer, as well as caregivers, healthcare professionals and community advocates knowledgeable about BAA experiences with lung cancer. We performed thematic analysis to identify experiences at patient, primary care and specialist levels. Contributing factors were identified using the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) health disparity model.

RESULTS

From March to November 2021, we conducted individual interviews with 19 participants, including 9 patients/caregivers and 10 providers/advocates. Participants reported recurring and increased pain before seeking treatment, treatment for non-cancer illnesses, delays in diagnostic tests and referrals, poor communication and bias when dealing with specialists and primary care providers. Factors contributing to suboptimal experiences included reluctance by insurers to cover costs, provider unwillingness to conduct comprehensive testing, provider bias in recommending treatment, high healthcare costs, and lack of healthcare facilities and qualified staff to provide necessary support. However, some participants reported positive experiences due to their insurance, availability of services and having an empowered support structure.

CONCLUSIONS

BAA patients and caregivers encountered suboptimal experiences during their care. The NIMHD model is a useful framework to organise factors contributing to these experiences that may be leading to health disparities. Additional research is needed to fully capture the extent of these experiences and identify ways to improve BAA patient experiences in the lung cancer diagnosis pathway.

Impact of time-to-treatment initiation on survival in single primary non-small cell lung Cancer: A population-based study

Background

Understanding the effects of a delayed time-to-treatment initiation(TTI) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is vital.

Methods

We analyzed NSCLC data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, focusing on lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous carcinoma (LUSC). TTI was studied as both continuous and dichotomous variables. Restricted cubic splines were employed to identify potential nonlinear dependency between the hazard ratio (HR) and TTI. Propensity score matching was used to ensure a balanced patient allocation, and then survival differences between groups were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and competing risk models. We used overall survival (OS) as the primary outcome and cancer-specific cumulative mortality (CSCM) as a complementary indicator. Finally, sensitivity analyses were performed on censored data.

Results

A total of 80,020 with NSCLC were analyzed. TTI was assessed as a continuous variable, showing a noticeable increase in the HR for stage I to II NSCLC with TTI >1 month. Conversely, the trend for stage III to IV NSCLC was the opposite. In stage I LUAD, the 'early' group demonstrated a higher OS compared to the 'delayed' group (Log-rank P = 0.002), while there was no significant difference in CSCM (Fine-gray P = 0.321). In stage I LUSC, there was no significant difference in OS(Log-rank P = 0.260), but the 'early' group had a lower CSCM (Fine-gray P = 0.018). For stage II-IV NSCLC, the 'delayed' group did not exhibit a negative impact on OS or CSCM. The sensitivity analysis further supported the results of the main analysis.

Conclusion

Prolongation of TTI ≥31 days has a negative impact on OS or CSCM in stage I NSCLC only. Further exploration and validation are needed to determine whether these results can be used as evidence for a 'safe' TTI threshold setting for future NSCLC.

Assessing a biomarker's ability to reduce invasive procedures in patients with benign lung nodules: Results from the ORACLE study

A blood-based integrated classifier (IC) has been clinically validated to improve accuracy in assessing probability of cancer risk (pCA) for pulmonary nodules (PN). This study evaluated the clinical utility of this biomarker for its ability to reduce invasive procedures in patients with pre-test pCA ≤ 50%. This was a propensity score matching (PSM) cohort study comparing patients in the ORACLE prospective, multicenter, observational registry to control patients treated with usual care. This study enrolled patients meeting the intended use criteria for IC testing: pCA ≤ 50%, age ≥40 years, nodule diameter 8-30 mm, and no history of lung cancer and/or active cancer (except for non-melanomatous skin cancer) within 5 years. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate invasive procedure use on benign PNs of registry patients as compared to control patients. A total of 280 IC tested, and 278 control patients met eligibility and analysis criteria and 197 were in each group after PSM (IC and control groups). Patients in the IC group were 74% less likely to undergo an invasive procedure as compared to the control group (absolute difference 14%, p <0.001) indicating that for every 7 patients tested, one unnecessary invasive procedure was avoided. Invasive procedure reduction corresponded to a reduction in risk classification, with 71 patients (36%) in the IC group classified as low risk (pCA < 5%). The proportion of IC group patients with malignant PNs sent to surveillance were not statistically different than the control group, 7.5% vs 3.5% for the IC vs. control groups, respectively (absolute difference 3.91%, p 0.075). The IC for patients with a newly discovered PN has demonstrated valuable clinical utility in a real-world setting. Use of this biomarker can change physicians' practice and reduce invasive procedures in patients with benign pulmonary nodules. Trial registration: Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03766958.

Brief Report: A Multidisciplinary Initial Workup for Suspected Lung Cancer as Fast-Track Intervention to Histopathologic Diagnosis

Guidelines for optimal timing of lung cancer diagnosis and treatment have been implemented in many countries, but the effect of fast-track interventions on the shortening of time interval is still debatable. In this study, the delay from the first specialist visit to the histopathologic diagnosis was compared between two patient cohorts: before (n = 280) and after (n = 247) implementation of a fast-track multidisciplinary diagnosis program. The cumulative incidence function curves were compared, and hazard ratio was adjusted in the Cox model. The implementation allowed a statistically significant increase in the cumulative incidence of the lung cancer histopathologic diagnosis over time. Adjusted hazard ratio for patients accrued in the post-implementation cohort was 1.22 (1.03-1.45) (p = 0.023), corresponding to a reduction of this waiting period by 18%. In conclusion, a multidisciplinary approach of the diagnostic process implemented at the initial visit allows a significant reduction of the timeline until the histopathologic diagnosis of lung cancer.

Impact of Duration of Diagnostic Workup on Prognosis for Early Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Growth assessment for pulmonary nodules is an important diagnostic tool; however, the impact on prognosis due to time delay for follow-up diagnostic scans needs to be considered.

METHODS

Using the data between 2003 and 2019 from the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program, a prospective cohort study, we determined the size-specific, 10-year Kaplan-Meier lung cancer (LC) survival rates as surrogates for cure rates. We estimated the change in LC diameter after delays of 90, 180, and 365 days using three representative LC volume doubling times (VDTs) of 60 (fast), 120 (moderate), and 240 (slow). We then estimated the decrease in the LC cure rate resulting from time between computed tomography scans to assess for growth during the diagnostic workup.

RESULTS

Using a regression model of the 10-year LC survival rates on LC diameter, the estimated LC cure rate of a 4.0 mm LC with fast (60-d) VDT is 96.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 95.2%-96.7%) initially, but it would decrease to 94.3% (95% CI: 93.2%-95.0%), 92.0% (95% CI: 90.5%-93.4%), and 83.6%(95% CI: 80.6%-86.6%) after delays of 90, 180, and 365 days, respectively. A 20.0-mm LC with the same VDTs has a lower LC cure rate of 79.9% (95% CI: 76.2%-83.5%) initially and decreases more rapidly to 71.5% (95% CI: 66.4%-76.7%), 59.8% (95% CI: 52.4%-67.1%), and 17.9% (95% CI: 3.0%-32.8%) after the same delays of 90, 180, and 365 days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Time between scans required to measure growth of lung nodules affects prognosis with the effect being greater for fast growing and larger cancers. Quantifying the extent of change in prognosis is required to understand efficiencies of different management protocols.

Survival outcomes following treatment delays among patients with early-stage female cancers: a nationwide study

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severely hindered the timely receipt of health care for patients with cancer, especially female patients. Depression and anxiety were more pronounced in female patients than their male counterparts with cancer during treatment wait-time intervals. Herein, investigating the impact of treatment delays on the survival outcomes of female patients with early-stage cancers can enhance the rational and precise clinical decisions of physicians.

METHODS

We analyzed five types of cancers in women from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program between Jan 2010 and Dec 2015. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to determine the impacts of treatment delays on the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of the patients.

RESULTS

A total of 241,661 females with early-stage cancer were analyzed (12,617 cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 166,051 cases of infiltrating breast cancer, 31,096 cases of differentiated thyroid cancer, 23,550 cases of colorectal cancer, and 8347 cases of cervical cancer). Worse OS rates were observed in patients with treatment delays ≥ 3 months in stage I NSCLC (_adjustedHazard ratio (HR) = 1.11, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.01-1.23, p = 0.044) and stage I infiltrating breast cancer (_adjustedHR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.11-1.37, p < 0.001). When the treatment delay intervals were analyzed as continuous variables, similar results were observed in patients with stage I NSCLC (_adjustedHR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, p = 0.010) and in those with stage I breast cancer (_adjustedHR = 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06, p = 0.029). However, treatment delays did not reduce the OS of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer, cervical cancer, or colorectal cancer in the early-stage. Only intermediate treatment delays impaired the CSS of patients with cervical cancer in stage I (_adjustedHR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.02-1.68, p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

After adjusting for confounders, the prolonged time from diagnosis to the initiation of treatment (< 6 months) showed limited negative effects on the survival of most of the patients with early-stage female cancers. Whether our findings serve as evidence supporting the treatment deferral decisions of clinicians for patients with different cancers in resource-limited situations needs further validation.

The impact of COVID-19 on thoracic surgical procedures in Japan: analysis of data from the National Clinical Database

Objective

The COVID-19 pandemic has far-reaching collateral health impacts on the ongoing delivery of surgical care worldwide. The current study was designed to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of surgeries of general thoracic surgery in Japan.

Methods

Changes in the number of surgeries for total and three representative tumors were analyzed using the National Clinical Database data with reference to the pandemic infection rate and lung cancer screening.

Results

In 2020, the number of surgeries in total and for primary lung cancer and mediastinal lung tumor decreased by 4.9, 5.1, and 5.0 %, respectively. Considering the five-year trend towards a 5 % annual increase, there was a potential 10 % decrease in the number of primary lung cancer surgeries. The number of primary lung cancer surgeries bottomed in July 2020 but recovered towards the end of the year. In contrast, the number of metastatic lung tumor surgeries in 2020 increased by 3.2 %, following a similar trend observed over the previous five years. The number of lung cancer screening examinees decreased markedly with the lowest number in May. Our findings indicate that surgical triage had a limited impact on the decrease in primary lung cancer surgeries during the pandemic; rather, the decrease in lung cancer screening, which was a few months preceding, is most likely responsible.

Conclusions

The decrease in primary lung cancer was mainly caused by the decrease in lung cancer screening, indicating that continuing screening is vital even during a pandemic.

Lung cancer: Prevention and early identification are key

ABSTRACT

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Many of the presenting symptoms of lung cancer are indistinguishable from symptoms of other problems, which often leads to delays of a lung cancer diagnosis. Early identification can lead to a timely diagnosis and improved quality of life.

Hospital-based multidisciplinary lung cancer care in Australia: a survey of the landscape in 2021

Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in Australia and has the highest cancer burden. Numerous reports describe variations in lung cancer care and outcomes across Australia. There are no data assessing compliance with treatment guidelines and little is known about lung cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT) infrastructure around Australia.

Methods

Clinicians from institutions treating lung cancer were invited to complete an online survey regarding the local infrastructure for lung cancer care and contemporary issues affecting lung cancer.

Results

Responses from 79 separate institutions were obtained representing 72% of all known institutions treating lung cancer in Australia. Most (93.6%) held a regular MDT meeting although recommended core membership was only achieved for 42/73 (57.5%) sites. There was no thoracic surgery representation in 17/73 (23.3%) of MDTs and surgery was less represented in regional and low case volume centres. Specialist nurses were present in just 37/79 (46.8%) of all sites. Access to diagnostic and treatment facilities was limited for some institutions. IT infrastructure was variable and most sites (69%) do not perform regular audits against guidelines. The COVID-19 pandemic has driven most sites to incorporate virtual MDT meetings, with variable impact around the country. Clinician support for a national data-driven approach to improving lung cancer care was unanimous.

Discussion

This survey demonstrates variations in infrastructure support, provision and membership of lung cancer MDTs, in particular thoracic surgery and specialist lung cancer nurses. This heterogeneity may contribute to some of the well-documented variations in lung cancer outcomes in Australia.