Association Between Positive Airway Pressure Adherence and Health Care Costs Among Individuals With OSA

Healthcare resource utilisation and costs in patients with treated obstructive sleep apnea

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent yet underdiagnosed disease that creates a large economic burden on the United States healthcare system. In this retrospective study, we tested the hypothesis that adherence to positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy, the 'gold standard' treatment for OSA, is associated with reduced healthcare resource utilisation and costs. We linked de-identified payer-sourced medical claims and objective PAP usage data for patients newly diagnosed with OSA. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to create balanced groups of patients who were either adherent, intermediately adherent, or non-adherent to PAP therapy. From a sample of 179,542 patients (average age 52.5 years, 61% male), 37% were adherent, 40% intermediate, and 23% non-adherent. During the first year, PAP adherence was significantly associated with fewer emergency room visits (mean [SD] adherent: 0.39 [1.20] versus intermediate: 0.47 [1.30], p < 0.001; versus non-adherent: 0.54 [1.44], p < 0.001), all-cause hospitalisations (mean [SD] adherent: 0.09 [0.43] versus intermediate: 0.12 [0.51], p < 0.001; versus non-adherent: 0.13 [0.55], p < 0.001), and lower total costs (mean [SD] adherent $5874 [8045] versus intermediate $6523 [9759], p < 0.001; versus non-adherent $6355 [10,517], p < 0.001). Results were similar in the second year of PAP use. These results provide additional evidence from a large, diverse sample to support the diagnosis and treatment of OSA and encourage long-term adherence to PAP therapy.

National Implementation of CPAP Telemonitoring and a Pay-for-performance Scheme for Homecare Providers in France Leads to Prioritisation of Resources to Individuals with Low Therapy Adherence: The IMPACT-PAP Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Long-term adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea remains suboptimal and low adherence increases healthcare costs. This study investigated relationships between CPAP adherence and the intensity of support provided by homecare providers after implementation of telemonitoring and pay-for-performance reimbursement for CPAP in France.

METHODS

Adults who started CPAP in 2018/2019, used telemonitoring, and had ≥1 year of homecare provider data were eligible. The main objective was to determine associations between CPAP adherence at 1 month (low [<2h/night], intermediate [2 to <4h/night], high [≥4h/night]) and the number/type of homecare provider interactions (home visits, phone calls, mask change) during the first year.

RESULTS

Eleven thousand, one hundred sixty-six individuals were included (mean age 59.8±12.7 years, 67% male). The number of homecare provider interactions per person increased significantly as 1-month CPAP usage decreased (7.65±4.3, 6.5±4.0, 5.4±3.4 in low, intermediate and high adherence groups; p<0.01). There was marked improvement in device usage over the first 5-6 months of therapy in the low and intermediate adherence subgroups (p<0.05 after adjustment for age, sex, initial CPAP adherence, and number of interactions). After adjustment for age, sex and 1-month adherence, having 3-4 interactions was significantly associated with better 1-year adherence (odds ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.46), while having >7 interactions was significantly associated with worse 1-year adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

The telemonitoring/reimbursement scheme in France had a positive impact on CPAP adherence and facilitated a more personalised approach to therapy management, focusing resources on patients with low and intermediate adherence.

Association Between Healthy Behaviors and Health Care Resource Use With Subsequent Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Adherence in OSA

BACKGROUND

The healthy adherer effect has gained increasing attention as potential source of bias in observational studies examining the association of positive airway pressure (PAP) adherence with health outcomes in OSA.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is adherence to PAP associated with healthy behaviors and health care resource use prior to device prescription?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Data from the IRSR Pays de la Loire Sleep Cohort were linked to health administrative data to identify proxies of heathy behaviors, including adherence to cardiovascular (CV) drugs (medical possession ratio), cancer screening tests, influenza vaccination, alcohol and smoking consumption, and drowsiness-related road accidents during the 2 years preceding PAP onset in patients with OSA. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the association of heathy behaviors with subsequent PAP adherence. Health care resource use was evaluated according to subsequent PAP adherence.

RESULTS

We included 2,836 patients who had started PAP therapy between 2012 and 2018 (65% of whom were PAP adherent with mean daily use ≥ 4 h/night). Being adherent to CV active drugs (medical possession ratio ≥ 80%) and a person who does not smoke were associated with a higher likelihood of PAP adherence (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.15-1.77 and OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.10-1.71, respectively). Patients with no history of drowsiness-related road accidents were more likely to continue PAP (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.04-1.87). Patients who were PAP adherent used less health care resources 2 years before PAP initiation than patients who were nonadherent (mean number of outpatient consultations: 19.0 vs 17.2, P = .003; hospitalization days: 5.7 vs 5.0; P = .04; ED visits: 30.7% vs 24.0%, P = .0002, respectively).

INTERPRETATION

Patients who adhere to PAP therapy for OSA were more health-seeking and used less health care resources prior to device initiation than patients who were nonadherent. Until the healthy adherer effect associated with PAP adherence is better understood, caution is warranted when interpreting the association of PAP adherence with CV health outcomes and health care resource use in nonrandomized cohorts.

Obstructive sleep apnea heterogeneity and autonomic function: a role for heart rate variability in therapy selection and efficacy monitoring

Obstructive sleep apnea is a highly prevalent sleep-related breathing disorder, resulting in a disturbed breathing pattern, changes in blood gases, abnormal autonomic regulation, metabolic fluctuation, poor neurocognitive performance, and increased cardiovascular risk. With broad inter-individual differences recognised in risk factors, clinical symptoms, gene expression, physiological characteristics, and health outcomes, various obstructive sleep apnea subtypes have been identified. Therapeutic efficacy and its impact on outcomes, particularly for cardiovascular consequences, may also vary depending on these features in obstructive sleep apnea. A number of interventions such as positive airway pressure therapies, oral appliance, surgical treatment, and pharmaceutical options are available in clinical practice. Selecting an effective obstructive sleep apnea treatment and therapy is a challenging medical decision due to obstructive sleep apnea heterogeneity and numerous treatment modalities. Thus, an objective marker for clinical evaluation is warranted to estimate the treatment response in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Currently, while the Apnea-Hypopnea Index is used for severity assessment of obstructive sleep apnea and still considered a major guide to diagnosis and managements of obstructive sleep apnea, the Apnea-Hypopnea Index is not a robust marker of symptoms, function, or outcome improvement. Abnormal cardiac autonomic modulation can provide additional insight to better understand obstructive sleep apnea phenotyping. Heart rate variability is a reliable neurocardiac tool to assess altered autonomic function and can also provide cardiovascular information in obstructive sleep apnea. Beyond the Apnea-Hypopnea Index, this review aims to discuss the role of heart rate variability as an indicator and predictor of therapeutic efficacy to different modalities in order to optimise tailored treatment for obstructive sleep apnea.

Drug therapies for obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

INTRODUCTION

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common disorder that can affect the quality of life and increase the risk for psychiatric, neurological and cardiometabolic diseases. Despite the significant burden, it poses on health and well-being, there is a lack of evidence regarding the use of drug therapies in these patients. This work aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatment alternatives for patients with OSA.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SciELO, LILACS, Scopus, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov, will be used for the search. A search strategy was developed to retrieve clinical trials that have evaluated polysomnographic primary outcome (Apnoea-Hypopnoea index) and secondary outcomes (eg, daytime sleepiness, adverse events) of any drug therapy used for OSA. No date or language restrictions will be applied. Two authors will independently select the studies meeting the inclusion criteria by screening the title, abstract and full text. Data will be extracted, and the risk of bias will be evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Review Manager V.5.4.1 will be used for data synthesis. The Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation will be used to assess the strength of the evidence.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

As a review of published data, it is not necessary to obtain ethical approval. The findings of this systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022362639.

The economic cost of obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disease associated with a high prevalence of costly comorbidities and accidents that add to the disease's economic impact. Although more attention has been focused on OSA in recent years, no previous systematic reviews have synthesized findings from existing studies that provide estimates of the economic cost of OSA. This study aims to summarize the findings of existing studies that provide estimates of the cost of OSA. Two bibliographic databases, PubMed and Scopus, were used to identify articles on the costs of OSA. The systematic literature review identified 5,938 publications, of which 31 met the inclusion criteria. According to the results, adjusted for inflation and converted to euros, the annual cost per patient ranged from €236 (the incremental cost of OSA) for New Zealand to €28,267 for the United States. The total annual cost per patient in Europe ranged from €1,669 to €5,186. OSA causes a significant burden on society, and OSA-related costs increase many years before the diagnosis and remain elevated for a long time after the diagnosis. Despite some well-conducted studies, the cost estimates for OSA are uncertain and specific to the context in which the study was conducted.

Creating an Optimal Approach for Diagnosing Sleep Apnea

Sleep apnea is nowadays recognized as a treatable chronic disease and awareness of it has increased, leading to an upsurge in demand for diagnostic testing. Conventionally, diagnosis depends on overnight polysomnography in a sleep clinic, which is highly human-resource intensive and ignores the night-to-night variability in classical sleep apnea markers, such as the apnea-hypopnea index. In this review, the authors summarize the main improvements that could be made in the sleep apnea diagnosis strategy; how technological innovations and multi-night home testing could be used to simplify, increase access, and reduce costs of diagnostic testing while avoiding misclassification of severity.