1
|
Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld EP, Kalman J, Saad EB, Shamloo AS, Andrade JG, Barbhaiya CR, Baykaner T, Boveda S, Calkins H, Chan NY, Chen M, Chen SA, Dagres N, Damiano RJ, De Potter T, Deisenhofer I, Derval N, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Dyrda K, Hindricks G, Hocini M, Kim YH, la Meir M, Merino JL, Michaud GF, Natale A, Nault I, Nava S, Nitta T, O'Neill M, Pak HN, Piccini JP, Pürerfellner H, Reichlin T, Saenz LC, Sanders P, Schilling R, Schmidt B, Supple GE, Thomas KL, Tondo C, Verma A, Wan EY. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2024; 21:e31-e149. [PMID: 38597857 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stylianos Tzeis
- Department of Cardiology, Mitera Hospital, 6, Erythrou Stavrou Str., Marousi, Athens, PC 151 23, Greece.
| | - Edward P Gerstenfeld
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Kalman
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Baker Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eduardo B Saad
- Electrophysiology and Pacing, Hospital Samaritano Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jason G Andrade
- Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Tina Baykaner
- Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Serge Boveda
- Heart Rhythm Management Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France; Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hugh Calkins
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ngai-Yin Chan
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Minglong Chen
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shih-Ann Chen
- Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, and Cardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | | | - Ralph J Damiano
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Isabel Deisenhofer
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich (TUM) School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolas Derval
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Luigi Di Biase
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Katia Dyrda
- Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Meleze Hocini
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Young-Hoon Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine and Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mark la Meir
- Cardiac Surgery Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jose Luis Merino
- La Paz University Hospital, Idipaz, Universidad Autonoma, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Viamed Santa Elena, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Andrea Natale
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA; Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA; Interventional Electrophysiology, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of Cardiology, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabelle Nault
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec (IUCPQ), Quebec, Canada
| | - Santiago Nava
- Departamento de Electrocardiología, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología 'Ignacio Chávez', Ciudad de México, México
| | - Takashi Nitta
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mark O'Neill
- Cardiovascular Directorate, St. Thomas' Hospital and King's College, London, UK
| | - Hui-Nam Pak
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Tobias Reichlin
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Luis Carlos Saenz
- International Arrhythmia Center, Cardioinfantil Foundation, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Prashanthan Sanders
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Boris Schmidt
- Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markuskrankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Gregory E Supple
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Claudio Tondo
- Department of Clinical Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Atul Verma
- McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Elaine Y Wan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld EP, Kalman J, Saad E, Shamloo AS, Andrade JG, Barbhaiya CR, Baykaner T, Boveda S, Calkins H, Chan NY, Chen M, Chen SA, Dagres N, Damiano RJ, De Potter T, Deisenhofer I, Derval N, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Dyrda K, Hindricks G, Hocini M, Kim YH, la Meir M, Merino JL, Michaud GF, Natale A, Nault I, Nava S, Nitta T, O'Neill M, Pak HN, Piccini JP, Pürerfellner H, Reichlin T, Saenz LC, Sanders P, Schilling R, Schmidt B, Supple GE, Thomas KL, Tondo C, Verma A, Wan EY. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2024; 67:921-1072. [PMID: 38609733 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-024-01771-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Edward P Gerstenfeld
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Kalman
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Baker Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eduardo Saad
- Electrophysiology and Pacing, Hospital Samaritano Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jason G Andrade
- Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Tina Baykaner
- Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Serge Boveda
- Heart Rhythm Management Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
- Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hugh Calkins
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ngai-Yin Chan
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Minglong Chen
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shih-Ann Chen
- Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Nikolaos Dagres
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Charité University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ralph J Damiano
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Isabel Deisenhofer
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich (TUM) School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolas Derval
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Luigi Di Biase
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Katia Dyrda
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Gerhard Hindricks
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Charité University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Meleze Hocini
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Young-Hoon Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine and Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mark la Meir
- Cardiac Surgery Department, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jose Luis Merino
- La Paz University Hospital, Idipaz, Universidad Autonoma, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Viamed Santa Elena, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gregory F Michaud
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea Natale
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Interventional Electrophysiology, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of Cardiology, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabelle Nault
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec (IUCPQ), Quebec, Canada
| | - Santiago Nava
- Departamento de Electrocardiología, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología 'Ignacio Chávez', Ciudad de México, México
| | - Takashi Nitta
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mark O'Neill
- Cardiovascular Directorate, St. Thomas' Hospital and King's College, London, UK
| | - Hui-Nam Pak
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Tobias Reichlin
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Luis Carlos Saenz
- International Arrhythmia Center, Cardioinfantil Foundation, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Prashanthan Sanders
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Boris Schmidt
- Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markuskrankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Gregory E Supple
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Claudio Tondo
- Department of Clinical Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Atul Verma
- McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Elaine Y Wan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Torma D, Janosi K, Debreceni D, Bocz B, Keseru M, Simor T, Kupo P. Initial experience with zero-fluoroscopy pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation: single-center observational trial. Sci Rep 2024; 14:16332. [PMID: 39009806 PMCID: PMC11251150 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67183-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) stands as a widely practiced cardiac ablation procedure on a global scale, conventionally guided by fluoroscopy. The concurrent application of electroanatomical mapping systems (EAMS) and intracardiac echocardiography offers a means to curtail radiation exposure. This study aimed to compare procedural outcomes between conventional and our initial zero-fluoroscopy cases in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), undergoing point-by-point PVI. Our prospective observational study included 100 consecutive patients with AF who underwent point-by-point radiofrequency PVI. The standard technique was used in the first 50 cases (Standard group), while the fluoroless technique was used in the subsequent 50 patients (Zero group). The zero-fluoroscopy approach exhibited significantly shorter procedural time (59.6 ± 10.7 min vs. 74.6 ± 13.2 min, p < 0.0001), attributed to a reduced access time (17 [16; 20] min vs. 31 [23; 34.5] min, p < 0.001). Comparable results were found for the number of RF applications, total ablation energy, and left atrial dwelling time. In the Zero group, all procedures were achieved without fluoroscopy, resulting in significantly lower fluoroscopy time (0 [0; 0] sec vs. 132 [100; 160] sec, p < 0.0001) and dose (0 [0; 0] mGy vs. 4.8 [4.1; 8.2] mGy, p < 0.0001). The acute success rate was 100%, with no major complications. Zero-fluoroscopy PVI is feasible, safe, and associated with shorter procedure times compared to the standard approach, even in cases without prior experience in zero-fluoroscopy PVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dalma Torma
- Medical School, Heart Institute, University of Pecs, Ifjusag utja 13., 7624, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Kristof Janosi
- Medical School, Heart Institute, University of Pecs, Ifjusag utja 13., 7624, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Dorottya Debreceni
- Medical School, Heart Institute, University of Pecs, Ifjusag utja 13., 7624, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Botond Bocz
- Medical School, Heart Institute, University of Pecs, Ifjusag utja 13., 7624, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Mark Keseru
- Medical School, Heart Institute, University of Pecs, Ifjusag utja 13., 7624, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Tamas Simor
- Medical School, Heart Institute, University of Pecs, Ifjusag utja 13., 7624, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Peter Kupo
- Medical School, Heart Institute, University of Pecs, Ifjusag utja 13., 7624, Pecs, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Osorio J, Miranda-Arboleda AF, Velasco A, Varley AL, Rajendra A, Morales GX, Hoyos C, Matos C, Thorne C, D'Souza B, Silverstein JR, Metzl MD, Hebsur S, Costea AI, Kang S, Sellers M, Singh D, Salam T, Nazari J, Ro AS, Mazer S, Moretta A, Oza SR, Magnano AR, Sackett M, Dukes J, Patel P, Goyal SK, Senn T, Newton D, Romero JE, Zei PC. Real-world data of radiofrequency catheter ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Short- and long-term clinical outcomes from the prospective multicenter REAL-AF Registry. Heart Rhythm 2024:S1547-5271(24)02524-4. [PMID: 38768839 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.04.090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The safety and long-term efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation (CA) of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) has been well established. Contemporary techniques to optimize ablation delivery, reduce fluoroscopy use, and improve clinical outcomes have been developed. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the contemporary real-world practice approach and short and long-term outcomes of RF CA for PAF through a prospective multicenter registry. METHODS Using the REAL-AF (Real-world Experience of Catheter Ablation for the Treatment of Symptomatic Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation; ClincalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04088071) Registry, patients undergoing RF CA to treat PAF across 42 high-volume institutions and 79 experienced operators were evaluated. The procedures were performed using zero or reduced fluoroscopy, contact force sensing catheters, wide area circumferential ablation, and ablation index as a guide with a target of 380-420 for posterior and 500-550 for anterior lesions. The primary efficacy outcome was freedom from all-atrial arrhythmia recurrence at 12 months. RESULTS A total of 2470 patients undergoing CA from January 2018 to December 2022 were included. Mean age was 65.2 ±11.14 years, and 44% were female. Most procedures were performed without fluoroscopy (71.5%), with average procedural and total RF times of 95.4 ± 41.7 minutes and 22.1±11.8 minutes, respectively. At 1-year follow-up, freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias was 81.6% with 89.7% of these patients off antiarrhythmic drugs. No significant difference was identified comparing pulmonary vein isolation vs pulmonary vein isolation plus ablation approaches. The complication rate was 1.9%. CONCLUSION Refinement of RF CA to treat PAF using contemporary tools, standardized protocols, and electrophysiology laboratory workflows resulted in excellent short- and long-term clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Osorio
- HCA Electrophysiology, Mercy Hospital, Miami, Florida
| | | | - Alejandro Velasco
- University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | | | - Anil Rajendra
- Arrhythmia Institute at Grandview, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | | | - Carlos Matos
- Brigham and Women`s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Benjamin D'Souza
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | - Steven Kang
- Sutter Alta Bates Summit Medical Center, Oakland, California
| | | | | | - Tariq Salam
- Pulse Heart Institute/Multicare, Tacoma, Washington
| | | | | | - Sean Mazer
- New Mexico Heart Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Parin Patel
- Ascension Medical Group, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | | | | | | | - Paul C Zei
- Brigham and Women`s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld EP, Kalman J, Saad EB, Sepehri Shamloo A, Andrade JG, Barbhaiya CR, Baykaner T, Boveda S, Calkins H, Chan NY, Chen M, Chen SA, Dagres N, Damiano RJ, De Potter T, Deisenhofer I, Derval N, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Dyrda K, Hindricks G, Hocini M, Kim YH, la Meir M, Merino JL, Michaud GF, Natale A, Nault I, Nava S, Nitta T, O’Neill M, Pak HN, Piccini JP, Pürerfellner H, Reichlin T, Saenz LC, Sanders P, Schilling R, Schmidt B, Supple GE, Thomas KL, Tondo C, Verma A, Wan EY. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace 2024; 26:euae043. [PMID: 38587017 PMCID: PMC11000153 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stylianos Tzeis
- Department of Cardiology, Mitera Hospital, 6, Erythrou Stavrou Str., Marousi, Athens, PC 151 23, Greece
| | - Edward P Gerstenfeld
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Kalman
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Baker Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eduardo B Saad
- Electrophysiology and Pacing, Hospital Samaritano Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jason G Andrade
- Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Tina Baykaner
- Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Serge Boveda
- Heart Rhythm Management Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
- Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hugh Calkins
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ngai-Yin Chan
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Minglong Chen
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shih-Ann Chen
- Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, and Cardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | | | - Ralph J Damiano
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Isabel Deisenhofer
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich (TUM) School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolas Derval
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Luigi Di Biase
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Katia Dyrda
- Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Meleze Hocini
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Young-Hoon Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine and Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mark la Meir
- Cardiac Surgery Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jose Luis Merino
- La Paz University Hospital, Idipaz, Universidad Autonoma, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Viamed Santa Elena, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Andrea Natale
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David’s Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Interventional Electrophysiology, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of Cardiology, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabelle Nault
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec (IUCPQ), Quebec, Canada
| | - Santiago Nava
- Departamento de Electrocardiología, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología ‘Ignacio Chávez’, Ciudad de México, México
| | - Takashi Nitta
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mark O’Neill
- Cardiovascular Directorate, St. Thomas’ Hospital and King’s College, London, UK
| | - Hui-Nam Pak
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Tobias Reichlin
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Luis Carlos Saenz
- International Arrhythmia Center, Cardioinfantil Foundation, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Prashanthan Sanders
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Boris Schmidt
- Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markuskrankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Gregory E Supple
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Claudio Tondo
- Department of Clinical Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Atul Verma
- McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Elaine Y Wan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Preda A, Bonvicini E, Coradello E, Testoni A, Gigli L, Baroni M, Carbonaro M, Vargiu S, Varrenti M, Colombo G, Paolucci M, Mazzone P, Guarracini F. The Fluoroless Future in Electrophysiology: A State-of-the-Art Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:182. [PMID: 38248058 PMCID: PMC10814721 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14020182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Fluoroscopy has always been the cornerstone imaging method of interventional cardiology procedures. However, radiation exposure is linked to an increased risk of malignancies and multiorgan diseases. The medical team is even more exposed to X-rays, and a higher incidence of malignancies was reported in this professional group. In the last years, X-ray exposure has increased rapidly, involving, above all, the medical team and young patients and forcing alternative fluoroless imaging methods. In cardiac electrophysiology (EP) and pacing, the advent of 3D electroanatomic mapping systems with dedicated catheters has allowed real-time, high-density reconstruction of both heart anatomy and electrical activity, significantly reducing the use of fluoroscopy. In addition, the diffusion of intracardiac echocardiography has provided high anatomical resolution of moving cardiac structures, providing intraprocedural guidance for more complex catheter ablation procedures. These methods have largely demonstrated safety and effectiveness, allowing for a dramatic reduction in X-ray delivery in most arrhythmias' ablations. However, some technical concerns, as well as higher costs, currently do not allow their spread out in EP labs and limit their use to only procedures that are considered highly complex and time-consuming and in young patients. In this review, we aim to update the current employment of fluoroless imaging in different EP procedures, focusing on its strengths and weaknesses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Preda
- Electrophysiology Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy (M.C.); (P.M.)
| | - Eleonora Bonvicini
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Verona University Hospital, 37129 Verona, Italy
| | - Elena Coradello
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Verona University Hospital, 37129 Verona, Italy
| | - Alessio Testoni
- Electrophysiology Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy (M.C.); (P.M.)
| | - Lorenzo Gigli
- Electrophysiology Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy (M.C.); (P.M.)
| | - Matteo Baroni
- Electrophysiology Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy (M.C.); (P.M.)
| | - Marco Carbonaro
- Electrophysiology Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy (M.C.); (P.M.)
| | - Sara Vargiu
- Electrophysiology Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy (M.C.); (P.M.)
| | - Marisa Varrenti
- Electrophysiology Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy (M.C.); (P.M.)
| | - Giulia Colombo
- Electrophysiology Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy (M.C.); (P.M.)
| | - Marco Paolucci
- Electrophysiology Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy (M.C.); (P.M.)
| | - Patrizio Mazzone
- Electrophysiology Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy (M.C.); (P.M.)
| | - Fabrizio Guarracini
- Electrophysiology Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy (M.C.); (P.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Debreceni D, Janosi KF, Turcsan M, Toth D, Bocz B, Simor T, Kupo P. Feasibility and safety of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation using exclusive intracardiac echocardiography guidance: a proof-of-concept, observational trial. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1244137. [PMID: 37900565 PMCID: PMC10601457 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1244137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Catheter ablation is the preferred treatment for typical atrial flutter (AFl), but it can be challenging due to anatomical abnormalities. The use of 3D electroanatomical mapping systems (EAMS) has reduced fluoroscopy exposure during AFl ablation. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has also shown benefits in reducing radiation exposure during AFl ablation. However, there is a lack of evidence on the feasibility of ICE-guided, zero-fluoroscopy AFl ablation without the use of EAMS. Methods In this prospective study, we enrolled 80 patients with CTI-dependent AFl. The first 40 patients underwent standard fluoroscopy + ICE-guided ablation (Standard ICE group), while the other 40 patients underwent zero-fluoroscopy ablation using only ICE (Zero ICE group). Procedure outcomes, including acute success, procedure time, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and complications, were compared between the groups. Results The acute success rate was 100% in both groups. Out of the 40 cases, the zero-fluoroscopy strategy was successfully implemented in 39 cases (97.5%) in the Zero ICE group. There were no significant differences in procedure time [55.5 (46.5; 66.8) min vs. 51.5 (44.0; 65.5), p = 0.50] and puncture to first ablation time [18 (13.5; 23) min vs. 19 (15; 23.5) min, p = 0.50] between the groups. The Zero ICE group had significantly lower fluoroscopy time [57 (36.3; 90) sec vs. 0 (0; 0) sec, p < 0.001] and dose [3.17 (2.27; 5.63) mGy vs. 0 (0; 0) mGy, p < 0.001] compared to the Standard ICE group. Total ablation time was longer in the Standard ICE group [597 (447; 908) sec vs. 430 (260; 750), p = 0.02], but total ablation energy [22,458 (14,836; 31,116) Ws vs. 17,043 (10,533; 29,302) Ws, p = 0.10] did not differ significantly. First-pass bidirectional conduction block of the CTI and acute reconnection rates were similar between the groups. No complications or recurrences were observed during the follow-up period. Conclusion Our study suggests that zero-fluoroscopy CTI ablation guided solely by ICE for AFl is feasible and safe. Further investigation is warranted for broader validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Peter Kupo
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Di Biase L, Zou F, Lin AN, Grupposo V, Marazzato J, Tarantino N, Della Rocca D, Mohanty S, Natale A, Alhuarrat MAD, Haiman G, Haimovich D, Matthew RA, Alcazar J, Costa G, Urman R, Zhang X. Feasibility of three-dimensional artificial intelligence algorithm integration with intracardiac echocardiography for left atrial imaging during atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. Europace 2023; 25:euad211. [PMID: 37477946 PMCID: PMC10403247 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is a useful but operator-dependent tool for left atrial (LA) anatomical rendering during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The CARTOSOUND FAM Module, a new deep learning (DL) imaging algorithm, has the potential to overcome this limitation. This study aims to evaluate feasibility of the algorithm compared to cardiac computed tomography (CT) in patients undergoing AF ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS In 28 patients undergoing AF ablation, baseline patient information was recorded, and three-dimensional (3D) shells of LA body and anatomical structures [LA appendage/left superior pulmonary vein/left inferior pulmonary vein/right superior pulmonary vein/right inferior pulmonary vein (RIPV)] were reconstructed using the DL algorithm. The selected ultrasound frames were gated to end-expiration and max LA volume. Ostial diameters of these structures and carina-to-carina distance between left and right pulmonary veins were measured and compared with CT measurements. Anatomical accuracy of the DL algorithm was evaluated by three independent electrophysiologists using a three-anchor scale for LA anatomical structures and a five-anchor scale for LA body. Ablation-related characteristics were summarized. The algorithm generated 3D reconstruction of LA anatomies, and two-dimensional contours overlaid on ultrasound input frames. Average calculation time for LA reconstruction was 65 s. Mean ostial diameters and carina-to-carina distance were all comparable to CT without statistical significance. Ostial diameters and carina-to-carina distance also showed moderate to high correlation (r = 0.52-0.75) except for RIPV (r = 0.20). Qualitative ratings showed good agreement without between-rater differences. Average procedure time was 143.7 ± 43.7 min, with average radiofrequency time 31.6 ± 10.2 min. All patients achieved ablation success, and no immediate complications were observed. CONCLUSION DL algorithm integration with ICE demonstrated considerable accuracy compared to CT and qualitative physician assessment. The feasibility of ICE with this algorithm can potentially further streamline AF ablation workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Di Biase
- Montefiore-Einstein Center for Heart & Vascular Care, Department of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E 210th street, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Fengwei Zou
- Montefiore-Einstein Center for Heart & Vascular Care, Department of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E 210th street, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Aung N Lin
- Montefiore-Einstein Center for Heart & Vascular Care, Department of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E 210th street, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Jacopo Marazzato
- Montefiore-Einstein Center for Heart & Vascular Care, Department of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E 210th street, Bronx, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Nicola Tarantino
- Montefiore-Einstein Center for Heart & Vascular Care, Department of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E 210th street, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Sanghamitra Mohanty
- St. David's Medical Center, Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Andrea Natale
- St. David's Medical Center, Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Majd Al Deen Alhuarrat
- Montefiore-Einstein Center for Heart & Vascular Care, Department of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E 210th street, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Roy Urman
- Biosense Webster, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- Montefiore-Einstein Center for Heart & Vascular Care, Department of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E 210th street, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Debreceni D, Janosi K, Bocz B, Turcsan M, Lukacs R, Simor T, Antolič B, Vamos M, Komocsi A, Kupo P. Zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1178783. [PMID: 37396578 PMCID: PMC10313423 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1178783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequently performed cardiac ablation procedure worldwide. The majority of ablations can now be performed safely with minimal radiation exposure or even without the use of fluoroscopy, thanks to advances in 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping systems and/or intracardiac echocardiography. The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of zero fluoroscopy (ZF) versus non-zero fluoroscopy (NZF) strategies for AF ablation procedures. Methods Electronic databases were searched and systematically reviewed for studies comparing procedural parameters and outcomes of ZF vs. NZF approaches in patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF. We used a random-effects model to derive the mean difference (MD) and risk ratios (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Our meta-analysis included seven studies comprising 1,593 patients. The ZF approach was found to be feasible in 95.1% of patients. Compared to the NZF approach, the ZF approach significantly reduced procedure time [mean difference (MD): -9.11 min (95% CI: -12.93 to -5.30 min; p < 0.01)], fluoroscopy time [MD: -5.21 min (95% CI: -5.51 to -4.91 min; p < 0.01)], and fluoroscopy dose [MD: -3.96 mGy (95% CI: -4.27 to -3.64; p < 0.01)]. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of total ablation time [MD: -104.26 s (95% CI: -183.37 to -25.14; p = 0.12)]. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the acute [risk ratio (RR): 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.02; p = 0.72] and long-term success rates (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.90-1.03; p = 0.56) between the ZF and NZF methods. The complication rate was 2.76% in the entire study population and did not differ between the groups (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.41-2.15; p = 0.89). Conclusion The ZF approach is a feasible method for AF ablation procedures. It significantly reduces procedure time and radiation exposure without compromising the acute and long-term success rates or complication rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kristof Janosi
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Botond Bocz
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Marton Turcsan
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Reka Lukacs
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Tamas Simor
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Bor Antolič
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Mate Vamos
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Andras Komocsi
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Peter Kupo
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Steerable sheath visualizable under 3D electroanatomical mapping facilitates paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation with minimal fluoroscopy. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2023; 66:381-388. [PMID: 35947317 PMCID: PMC9977702 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-022-01332-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in technology and workflows have facilitated substantial reductions in fluoroscopy utilization and procedure times for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablations. A recently available steerable sheath, visualizable on a 3D electroanatomical map (EAM), may further simplify low/zero fluoroscopy ablation workflows by facilitating understanding of the relative positions of the catheter and sheath. The objective of this study was to demonstrate feasibility, safety, procedural efficiency, and clinical effectiveness of incorporating the new visualizable sheath into a low-fluoroscopy workflow. METHODS Consecutive de novo paroxysmal AF procedures were performed with a porous tip contact force catheter at a high-volume site between January 2018 and May 2019. Procedures performed with and without the VIZIGO™ EAM-visualizable sheath (Vizigo) were compared. All ablations employed the same standardized low-fluoroscopy workflow. Statistical analyses employed stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) to balance cohorts by operator and key patient characteristics. RESULTS Cohorts of 142 Vizigo and 173 non-Vizigo patients were similar at baseline. Use of the Vizigo sheath was associated with approximately 10% improvement in catheter stability (p = 0.0005), 16% reduction in radiofrequency time (p < 0.0001), and 7% fewer ablations that used fluoroscopy (p = 0.0030). There was one cardiac tamponade in each cohort and no deaths, atrioesophageal fistulas, or strokes. Single-procedure freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence through 12 months was similar between cohorts (p = 0.9556). CONCLUSIONS Use of a 3D EAM-visualizable sheath resulted in improved catheter stability, reduced radiofrequency time, and more procedures performed without fluoroscopy, without compromise to safety or effectiveness.
Collapse
|
11
|
Jingquan Z, Deyong L, Huimin C, Hua F, Xuebin H, Chenyang J, Yan L, Xuebin L, Min T, Zulu W, Yumei X, Jinlin Z, Wei Z, Xiaochun Z, Daxin Z, Yun Z, Changsheng M, Zei PC, Di Biase L. Intracardiac echocardiography Chinese expert consensus. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:1012731. [PMID: 36277762 PMCID: PMC9584059 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1012731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, percutaneous catheter interventions have continuously evolved, becoming an essential strategy for interventional diagnosis and treatment of many structural heart diseases and arrhythmias. Along with the increasing complexity of cardiac interventions comes ever more complex demands for intraoperative imaging. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is well-suited for these requirements with real-time imaging, real-time monitoring for intraoperative complications, and a well-tolerated procedure. As a result, ICE is increasingly used many types of cardiac interventions. Given the lack of relevant guidelines at home and abroad and to promote and standardize the clinical applications of ICE, the members of this panel extensively evaluated relevant research findings, and they developed this consensus document after discussions and correlation with front-line clinical work experience, aiming to provide guidance for clinicians and to further improve interventional cardiovascular diagnosis and treatment procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhong Jingquan
- Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Remodeling and Function Research, Chinese Ministry of Education, Chinese National Health Commission and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, State and Shandong Province Joint Key Laboratory of Translational Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China,Department of Cardiology, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Qingdao, China,*Correspondence: Zhong Jingquan,
| | - Long Deyong
- Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China,Long Deyong,
| | - Chu Huimin
- Ningbo First Hospital, Zhejiang University, Ningbo, China
| | - Fu Hua
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Han Xuebin
- The Affiliated Cardiovascular Hospital, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Jiang Chenyang
- Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Li Yan
- Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Li Xuebin
- Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tang Min
- Fuwai Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wang Zulu
- General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
| | - Xue Yumei
- Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | | | - Zhang Wei
- Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | | | - Zhou Daxin
- Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhang Yun
- Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Remodeling and Function Research, Chinese Ministry of Education, Chinese National Health Commission and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, State and Shandong Province Joint Key Laboratory of Translational Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Ma Changsheng
- Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Paul C. Zei
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Luigi Di Biase
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chen YH, Wang LG, Zhou XD, Fang Y, Su L, Wu SJ, Huang WJ, Xiao FY. Outcome and safety of intracardiac echocardiography guided left atrial appendage closure within zero-fluoroscopy atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2022; 33:667-676. [PMID: 35040537 DOI: 10.1111/jce.15370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Simultaneous atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is sometimes recommended for both rhythm control and stroke prevention. However, the advantages of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) guidance for this combined procedure have been scarcely reported. We aim to evaluate the clinical outcomes and safety of ICE guided LAAC within a zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS From April 2019 to April 2020, 56 patients with symptomatic AF underwent concomitant catheter ablation and LAAC. ICE with a multi-angled imaging protocol mimicking the TEE echo windows was used to guide LAAC. Successful radiofrequency catheter ablation and LAAC were achieved in all patients. Procedure related adverse event rate was 3.6%. During the 12-month follow-up, 75.0% of patients became free of arrhythmia recurrences and oral anticoagulants were discontinued in 96.4% of patients. No ischemic stroke occurred despite two cases of device-related thrombosis versus an expected stroke rate of 4.8% based on the CHA2 DS2 -VASc score. The overall major bleeding events rate was 1.8%, which represented a relative reduction of 68% versus an expected bleeding rate of 5.7% based on the HAS-BLED score of the patient cohort. The incidence of iatrogenic atrial septal defect secondary to a single transseptal access dropped from 57.9% at 2 months to 4.2% at 12 months TEE follow-up. CONCLUSION The combination of catheter ablation and LAAC under ICE guidance was safe and effective in AF patients with high stroke risk. ICE with our novel protocol was technically feasible for comprehensive and systematic assessment of device implantation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-He Chen
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 325000, Nanbaixiang, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Liang-Guo Wang
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 325000, Nanbaixiang, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Zhou
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 325000, Nanbaixiang, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Ying Fang
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 325000, Nanbaixiang, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lan Su
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 325000, Nanbaixiang, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Sheng-Jie Wu
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 325000, Nanbaixiang, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Wei-Jian Huang
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 325000, Nanbaixiang, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Fang-Yi Xiao
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 325000, Nanbaixiang, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Elvin Gul E, Azizi Z, Alipour P, Haseeb S, Malcolm R, Terricabras M, Sanchez Somonte P, Tsang B, Khaykin Y, Wulffhart Z, Verma A, Pantano A. Fluoroless Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Integration of Intracardiac Echocardiography and Cartosound Module. J Atr Fibrillation 2021; 14:20200477. [PMID: 34950370 DOI: 10.4022/jafib.20200477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical efficacy of non-fluoroscopic radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in comparison to traditional fluoroscopy-guided ablation in a local Canadian community cohort. Methods We retrospectively studied consecutive patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) guided by intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and Carto system (CartoSound module). ICE-guided PVI without fluoroscopy (Zero-fluoro group) was performed in 116 patients, and conventional fluoroscopy-guided PVI (Traditional group) was performed in 131 patients. Results Two hundred and forty-seven patients with AF (60.7% male; mean age: 62.2 ± 10.6 years; paroxysmal AF =63.1%) who underwent PVI were studied. Mean procedure times were similar between both groups (136.8±33.4 minutes in the zero-fluoro group vs. 144.3±44.9 minutes in the traditional group; p=0.2). Acute PVI was achieved in all patients. Survival from early AF recurrence was 85% and 81% in the zero-fluoro and traditional groups, respectively (p = 0.06). Survival from late AF recurrence (12-months) between the zero-fluoro and traditional groups was also similar (p=0.1). Moreover, there were no significant differences between complication rates, including hematoma (p = 0.2) and tamponade (p = 1),between both groups. Conclusions Zero-fluoroscopy ICE and CartoSound-guided AF ablation may be safe and feasible in patients undergoing PVI compared to conventional fluoroscopy-guided ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enes Elvin Gul
- Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Contributed equally as first co-authors
| | - Zahra Azizi
- Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Contributed equally as first co-authors
| | - Pouria Alipour
- Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sohaib Haseeb
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rebecca Malcolm
- Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maria Terricabras
- Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paula Sanchez Somonte
- Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bernice Tsang
- Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yaariv Khaykin
- Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zaev Wulffhart
- Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Atul Verma
- Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alfredo Pantano
- Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Iwasaki YK, Fujimoto Y, Ito-Hagiwara K, Oka E, Hayashi H, Yamamoto T, Murata H, Yodogawa K, Shimizu W. Metal interference alert guided septal approach with 3 catheter positions on intracardiac echocardiography for a near-zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. IJC HEART & VASCULATURE 2021; 37:100896. [PMID: 34746363 PMCID: PMC8555271 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Attempting to minimize radiation exposure during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) for patients, operators and medical staffs should be performed. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of a metal interference alert guided septal approach using 3 intracardiac echocardiography viewing positions for near-zero fluoroscopy AF ablation procedures. METHODS/RESULTS A total of 668 procedures among 608 consecutive patients with AF (67.2 ± 7.3 years, 408 males) who underwent catheter ablation were retrospectively evaluated and divided into 2 groups, near-zero group (n = 42) and conventional group (n = 595). In the near-zero group, a metal interference alert guided septal approach with 3 different catheter intracardiac echocardiography positions to minimize the fluoroscopy time was applied, and a left atrial access with 2 long sheaths from a single septal puncture without fluoroscopy was successfully achieved in 41 out of 42 cases. The total fluoroscopy time was significantly shorter in the near-zero group than that in the conventional group (0.5 ± 2.0 vs. 21.4 ± 12.9 min p < 0.0001). The total procedure time and time to the septal puncture were both significantly longer in the near-zero group than those in the conventional group (131.4 ± 40.2 vs. 116.6 ± 46.4p = 0.0453, 31.6 ± 9.2 vs. 19.9 ± 10.2 min, p < 0.0001), The ablation time did not differ between the 2 groups (Near-zero: 99.8 ± 41.0 vs. Conventional: 96.8 ± 44.3 min, p = 0.6663). There were no significant differences in the complication rate between the 2 groups (Near-zero: 0 vs. Conventional 14 case, p = 0.6151). CONCLUSION A metal interference alert guided septal approach using 3 intracardiac echocardiography viewing positions was feasible and safe for a near-zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation of AF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-ki Iwasaki
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuhi Fujimoto
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Eiichiro Oka
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Hayashi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Teppei Yamamoto
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshige Murata
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenji Yodogawa
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wataru Shimizu
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|