Clinical Features and Survival of Single Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study of 531,605 Patients

Clinical Outcomes and Intrinsic Subtypes of Breast Cancer Patients with Single Hormone Receptor-positive Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Extensive studies have highlighted the significance of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) in breast cancer (BRCA). However, our understanding of patients with single hormone receptor (HR)-positive (sHR+) BRCA remains limited. This lack of understanding poses challenges in predicting prognosis and selecting appropriate treatments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We collected data from a total of 825 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) BRCA patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in two distinct cohorts. Four subgroups were created within each cohort based on their HR expression: ER+/PR+, ER+/PR-, ER-/PR+, and ER-/PR-. We conducted comparative analyses to assess clinicopathological characteristics, chemotherapy responsiveness, clinical outcomes, and intrinsic subtyping among these subgroups.

RESULTS

ER+/PR- constituted 11.1% and 14.9% of samples in two cohorts, respectively, whereas ER-/PR+ comprised 8.3% and 3.7%. Higher histologic grades were more common in the ER-/PR+ group as compared to the ER+/PR+ subgroup (P = .0075 in cohort 1; P = .026 in cohort 2). Additionally, after multivariable analysis, ER-/PR+ were more likely to achieve pathological complete response (pCR) (cohort 1: OR =6.67; 95%CI, 2.63-16.94; P < .001; cohort 2: OR =3.70; 95%CI, 1.08-11.84; P = .030;). Between ER+/PR- and ER+/PR+, the distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) was comparable. The survival outcomes in the ER-/PR+ subgroup present a partial inconsistency between the 2 cohorts. Furthermore, the ER-/PR+ subgroup exhibited a higher incidence of the basal-like subtype, while the ER+/PR- subgroup had a higher proportion of luminal-like subtypes.

CONCLUSION

This study highlighted the distinct clinical and genetic characteristics of sHR+ BRCA, emphasizing the potential need for optimized treatment strategies.

Targeting the crosstalk between estrogen receptors and membrane growth factor receptors in breast cancer treatment: Advances and opportunities

Estrogens play a critical role in the initiation and progression of breast cancer. Estrogen receptor (ER)α, ERβ, and G protein-coupled estrogen receptor are the primary receptors for estrogen in breast cancer. These receptors are mainly activated by binding with estrogens. The crosstalk between ERs and membrane growth factor receptors creates additional pathways that amplify the effects of their ligands and promote tumor growth. This crosstalk may cause endocrine therapy resistance in ERα-positive breast cancer. Furthermore, this may explain the resistance to anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) treatment in ERα-/HER2-positive breast cancer and chemotherapy resistance in triple-negative breast cancer. Accordingly, it is necessary to understand the complex crosstalk between ERs and growth factor receptors. In this review, we delineate the crosstalk between ERs and membrane growth factor receptors in breast cancer. Moreover, this review highlights the current progress in clinical treatment and discusses how pharmaceuticals target the crosstalk. Lastly, we discuss the current challenges and propose potential solutions regarding the implications of targeting crosstalk via pharmacological inhibition. Overall, the present review provides a landscape of the crosstalk between ERs and membrane growth factor receptors in breast cancer, along with valuable insights for future studies and clinical treatments using a chemotherapy-sparing regimen to improve patient quality of life.

Long non-coding RNA SOX2OT in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer

Hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer can become aggressive after developing hormone-treatment resistance. This study elucidated the role of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) SOX2OT in tamoxifen-resistant (TAMR) breast cancer and its potential interplay with the tumor microenvironment (TME). TAMR breast cancer cell lines TAMR-V and TAMR-H were compared with the luminal type A cell line (MCF-7). LncRNA expression was assessed via next-generation sequencing, RNA extraction, lncRNA profiling, and quantitative RT-qPCR. SOX2OT overexpression effects on cell proliferation, migration, and invasion were evaluated using various assays. SOX2OT was consistently downregulated in TAMR cell lines and TAMR breast cancer tissue. Overexpression of SOX2OT in TAMR cells increased cell proliferation and cell invasion. However, SOX2OT overexpression did not significantly alter SOX2 levels, suggesting an independent interaction within TAMR cells. Kaplan-Meier plot analysis revealed an inverse relationship between SOX2OT expression and prognosis in luminal A and B breast cancers. Our findings highlight the potential role of SOX2OT in TAMR breast cancer progression. The downregulation of SOX2OT in TAMR breast cancer indicates its involvement in resistance mechanisms. Further studies should explore the intricate interactions between SOX2OT, SOX2, and TME in breast cancer subtypes.

PIK3CA mutation-driven immune signature as a prognostic marker for evaluating the tumor immune microenvironment and therapeutic response in breast cancer

PURPOSE

Gene mutations drive tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) heterogeneity, in turn affecting prognosis and immunotherapy efficacy. PIK3CA is the most frequently mutated gene in breast cancer (BC), yet its relevance to BC prognosis remains controversial. Herein, we sought to determine the impact of PIK3CA mutation-driven immune genes (PDIGs) on BC prognosis in relation to TIME heterogeneity.

METHODS

PIK3CA mutation characteristics were compared and verified between the TCGA-BRCA dataset and a patient cohort from our hospital. PIK3CA mutation-driven differentially expressed genes were identified for consensus clustering and weighted gene co-expression network analysis to select the modules most relevant to the immune subtype. Thereafter, the two were intersected to obtain PDIGs. Univariate Cox, LASSO, and multivariate Cox regression analyses were sequentially performed on PDIGs to obtain a PIK3CA mutation-driven immune signature (PDIS), which was then validated using the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Differences in functional enrichment, mutation landscape, immune infiltration, checkpoint gene expression, and drug response were compared between different risk groups.

RESULTS

PIK3CA mutation frequencies in the TCGA and validation cohorts were 34.49% and 40.83%, respectively. PIK3CA mutants were significantly associated with ER, PR, and molecular BC subtypes in our hospital cohort. The PDIS allowed for effective risk stratification and exhibited prognostic power in TCGA and GEO sets. The low-risk patients exhibited greater immune infiltration, higher expression of common immune checkpoint factors, and lower scores for tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion.

CONCLUSION

The PDIS can be used as an effective prognostic model for predicting immunotherapy response to guide clinical decision-making.

ER+/PR- phenotype exhibits more aggressive biological features and worse outcome compared with ER+/PR+ phenotype in HER2-negative inflammatory breast cancer

The loss of progesterone receptor (PR) often predicts worse biological behavior and prognosis in estrogen receptor-positive (ER +) breast cancer. However, the impact of PR status on inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) has not been studied. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to investigate the influence of PR on IBC. Patients with ER+ and HER2-negative IBC were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Pearson's χ2 test was used to compare the clinicopathological characteristics between patients with estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive (ER+/PR +) and patients with estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-negative (ER+/PR-). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the effects of PR status on the breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) in IBC. Overall, 1553 patients including 1157 (74.5%) patients with ER+/PR+ and 396 (25.5%) patients with ER+/PR- were analyzed in our study. The patients with ER+/PR- were more likely to be high histological grade (p < 0.001) and liver metastasis (p = 0.045) compared to patients with ER+/PR+. Despite higher chance of receiving chemotherapy (83.6% vs 77.3%, P = 0.008), patients with ER+/PR- showed worse BCSS (5-year BCSS rate, 34.3% vs 51.3%, P < 0.001) and OS (5-year OS rate, 31.3% vs 46.1%, P < 0.001) compared with ER+/PR+ phenotype. Multivariate survival analysis showed that patients with ER+/PR- still had worse BCSS (hazard ratios [HR]: 1.764, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.476-2.109, P < 0.001) and OS (HR: 1.675, 95% CI 1.411-1.975, P < 0.001) than ER+/PR+ phenotype. Furthermore, patients with ER+/PR- showed worse outcomes than ER+/PR+ phenotype in most subgroups, especially in patients with younger age (≤ 60 years), lower histological grade, lymph node involved and distant metastasis. Patients with ER+/PR- had more aggressive biological behaviors and worse outcomes than patients with ER+/PR+ in IBC. Stronger treatments maybe needed for IBC patients with ER+/PR-.

Hormone receptors in breast cancer: An update on the uncommon subtypes

Breast cancer is the most common cancer affecting women and is the second leading cause of cancer death among US women. Estrogen receptor (ER) signaling plays a crucial role in mammary gland development and carcinogenesis. Near 80 % of invasive breast cancers are ER-positive (ER+). Endocrine therapies targeting ER have significantly improved the prognostic outcomes in the patients with ER+ breast cancer, and the therapeutic effects are strongly correlated with the levels of the ER expression in tumor cells. Despite being an ER-dependent gene product, PR is not always overexpressed in ER+ tumors, and a small subset of breast cancers demonstrates an ER+/PR- phenotype, and a rare ER-/PR+ subtype also exists. There have been controversies on the biology of these tumor types and the predictive and prognostic power of PR status. Compelling data have shown the distinct biologic characteristics of ER+/PR- and ER-/PR+ tumors. Despite that ER-low breast cancers demonstrate more similarity to ER- tumors, at least a subset of ER-low carcinomas may have a functional ER signaling. Thus, adequate PR expression is essential as its absence indicates impaired ER pathway. Assessment of PR status may not only distinguish the ER+/PR- subset from the ER+ and ER-low tumors, but also differentiate the ER-/PR+ phenotype from the ER- carcinomas, both with therapeutic implications. This article was aimed to provide an up-to-date review focusing on the clinicopathologic characteristics of uncommon subtypes of breast cancer, including ER+/PR-, ER-/PR+, and ER-low breast cancers.

The effect of prolonged neoadjuvant endocrine therapy on the efficacy of treatment with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

At present, there is no consensus on the required duration of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET), yet there is no consistent conclusion on the factors influencing the efficacy of treatment with breast cancer after prolonged treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effect of prolonged NET on the efficacy of patients with breast cancer and analyze the factors influencing the efficacy of treatment with breast cancer after the treatment duration is prolonged.

METHODS

The case histories of 51 patients who were diagnosed with breast cancer and received NET in our hospital from September 2017 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received NET for over 12 months. The clinical efficacy and tumor size changes after treatment for six months and 12 months were compared, and the factors influencing the efficacy of treatment with breast cancer after patients' treatment duration was prolonged were analyzed.

RESULTS

(1) Among the 51 patients, the objective remission rate (ORR) of NET, at T = 6 months was 21.6%, and the average tumor size was 15.52 ± 7.30 mm. The ORR of the NET at T = 12 months was 52.9%, and the average tumor size was 13.79 ± 7.43 mm. (2) After the treatment duration was prolonged, the clinical ORRs of patients with estrogen receptor (ER) (+) and progesterone receptor (PR) (+) were significantly higher than that of patients with ER (+) and PR (-) and patients with ER (-) and PR (+), which was (P < 0.05). (3) There was no significant difference between the patients' axillary lymph node status and the Ki67 expression before treatment and the clinical ORR after prolonged treatment, which was (P> 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Prolonging the NET duration for patients with breast cancer can improve their clinical ORR and further reduce the tumor size, but patients' conditions should be closely monitored during the treatment process to prevent the progression of disease due to drug resistance. (2) The expression state of ER or PR may be used as a factor influencing the efficacy of treatment with breast cancer after prolonged treatment. (3) There was no significant effect on the patients' axillary lymph node status and the Ki67 expression before treatment on the clinical efficacy after prolonged treatment.

Single progesterone receptor-positive phenotype has the similar clinicopathological features and outcome as triple-negative subtype in metastatic breast cancer

Objective

The same clinicopathological features and prognosis have been reported between single progesterone receptor-positive (sPR-positive) and triple-negative phenotype in early-stage breast cancer, but such similarity has not been studied in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to estimate the difference between sPR-positive phenotype and other phenotypes in MBC.

Methods

Patients with HER-2-negative MBC were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Pearson's χ2 test was used to compare the difference of clinicopathologic factors between sPR-positive phenotype and other phenotypes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the effects of hormone receptor (HoR) phenotypes and other clinicopathologic factors on the cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Overall, 10877 patients including 7060 patients (64.9%) with double HoR-positive (dHoR-positive), 1533 patients (14.1%) with single estrogen receptor-positive (sER-positive), 126 patients (1.2%) with sPR-positive and 2158 patients (19.8%) with double HoR-negative (dHoR-negative) were analyzed. The patients with sPR-positive or dHoR-negative were more likely to be younger, higher grade and tumor stage, visceral and brain metastasis than ER-positive phenotypes (P<0.001). MBC with sPR-positive had the similar CSS (HR: 1.135, 95%CI: 0.909-1.417, P=2.623) and OS (HR: 1.141, 95%CI: 0.921-1.413, P=0.229) as dHoR-negative, but worse outcome than ER-positive phenotypes. Chemotherapy significantly improved the survival for MBC, especially for sPR-positive MBC (CSS, HR: 0.39, 95%CI: 0.213-0.714, P=0.002; OS, HR: 0.366, 95%CI: 0.203-0.662, P=0.001).

Conclusions

Patients with sPR-positive and triple-negative have similar biological behavior and prognosis in MBC. Chemotherapy may be a preferred recommendation for MBC with sPR-positive.

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic analysis of PIK3CA mutation in breast cancer patients in Northwest China

PURPOSE

Multiple studies on PIK3CA mutations in breast cancer (BC) had been performed, which showed the controversial results among different countries and races even those from the same country. The present study aimed to explore the PIK3CA gene mutation status in BC patients in Northwest China and reveal the relationship between PIK3CA mutations and clinicopathological features along with prognosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1002 BC patients from Northwest China were recruited in this study, genomic DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues, and hotspot mutations in the exon 9 and 20 of PIK3CA gene were detected by ARMS-PCR.

RESULTS

PIK3CA mutations were found in 31.2% (313/1002) of BC patients, among them 66.1% were mutations in exon 20% and 32.6% were mutations in exon 9. H1047R was the most common mutation type, accounting for 56.5% of the total mutated samples. Significant correlations were observed between PIK3CA mutation status and age (P = 0.035), histopathologic types (P = 0.004), pathological grade (P = 0.013), ER positivity (P < 0.001), PR positivity (P < 0.001), molecular subtypes (P = 0.004) and family history (P = 0.007). Cox multivariate analysis showed that patients with mutations in exon 9 or 20 had shorter DFS and OS than wild-type patients. Those with exon 9 mutations subgroup had the worst prognosis. Interestingly, patients with H1047L mutation had the best prognosis than others.

CONCLUSION

PIK3CA mutations could be used as an indicator of clinical outcome or targeted therapy for multiple breast cancer subgroups in Northwest China.

Role of Estrogen Receptor-Positive/Negative Ratios in Regulating Breast Cancer

The alpha estrogen receptor (ERα) contributes to breast cancer progression and recent guidelines define ER positivity as ≥1% stained cells, and a few tumor tissues show no ERα expression at all or are at 100%. Although ER and aromatase inhibitors are widely used to treat hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, their effect on tumor activity at different ERα levels remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the role of ERα+/ERα− ratios in determining the ERα level. We used ERα stably transfected and wild-type MDA-MB-231 cells (MDA-MB-231^Trans−ER and MDA-MB-231^WT, respectively) as represented ER+ and ER− cells, respectively, and MCF-7 cells were the positive control. MDA-MB-231^Trans−ER and MDA-MB-231^WT cells were mixed and cocultured at a ratio of 0%, 20%, 40%, 70%, and 100%. Migration and invasion functions at different cell ratios were evaluated in vitro using the Transwell and scratch test. In a xenograft mouse model, the polarization of the tumor-associated (M2) macrophage and the expression of breast cancer gene 1 (BRCA1), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α were measured. The results showed that the cell invasion and migration were significantly higher at 40% and 70% than they were at other ratios. Additionally, in vivo, the 70% ERα+/ERα-ratio was a critical indicator of cell activity and cytokine expression. The highest M2 level and expression of VEGR, TNF-α, BRCA1, and HER2 were shown at a ratio of 70%. Moreover, the effects of ERα were not linear in breast cancer, indicating that the ERα status requires continuous monitoring during long-term endocrine treatment. These results indicate that during HR+ breast cancer treatment, the ERα+/ERα− ratio may be a useful predictor and should be evaluated further.

Prognostic Relevance of Estrogen Receptor Status in Circulating Tumor Cells in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Endocrine Therapy

Recently, female breast cancer (BC) has surpassed lung cancer to occupy the first place of the most commonly diagnosed cancer. The unsatisfactory prognosis of endocrine therapy for breast cancer might be attributed to the discordance in estrogen receptor (ER) status between primary tumors and corresponding metastases, as well as temporal and spatial receptor status heterogeneity at point-in-time between biopsy and treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic and predictive value of ER status in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in BC patients. We analyzed ER expression on CTCs isolated using the Pep@MNPs method in 2.0 ml of blood samples from 70 patients with BC and 67 female controls. The predictive and prognostic value of ER expression in CTCs and immunohistochemistry results of biopsies for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients in response to therapies were assessed. The detection rate for CTCs was 95.71% (67/70 patients), with a median of 8 CTCs within 2 ml of peripheral venous blood (PVB). A concordance of 76.56% in ER status between CTCs and corresponding primary tumor and 69.23% between CTCs and corresponding metastases was observed. We also found that patients with ER-positive CTCs (CTC ^ER+) had longer PFS and OS than those without ER-positive CTCs (CTC ^ER-). Our findings suggested that ER status in CTCs of BC patients may provide valuable predictive and prognostic insights into endocrine therapies, although further evaluation in larger prospective trials is required.

Influence of progesterone receptor on metastasis and prognosis in breast cancer patients with negative HER-2

BACKGROUND

In de novo metastatic breast cancer patients, the site of metastasis and prognosis are related to the molecular subtype of breast cancer. There are few relevant reports to explore the clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics of different single positive hormone receptor subtypes [estrogen receptor (ER)+/progesterone receptor (PR)- and ER-/PR+] of metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2015.We analyzed the metastatic patterns and prognosis of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-negative breast cancer patients. Cox analysis was used to analyze the influence of ER+/PR- and ER-/PR+ on the prognosis of patients in different subgroups and the risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with single hormone receptor positivity.

RESULTS

We included 206,187 breast cancer patients, including 7,726 stage IV patients. The loss of ER was a protective factor against bone metastasis (P<0.001) and a risk factor for visceral metastasis (P<0.001). The ER-/PR+ subtype had a similar proportion of de novo metastatic breast cancer, and similar clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Single PR positivity was an independent risk factor for cancer specific survival (CSS) in multi-visceral metastasis subgroup comparing to TNBC. Meanwhile, no significant difference in overall survival (OS) or breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) between ER-/PR+ and ER-/PR- patients in all breast cancer patients or in stage IV breast cancer patients. Age [hazard ratio (HR) =2.16], grade (HR =2.36), T stage (T4: HR =3.24), lymph node metastasis (>10: HR =4.33), distant metastasis (HR =4.99), and no chemotherapy or an unknown (HR =1.65) were high-risk factors but surgery (HR <0.5) were protective factors for CSS in ER-/PR+ patients.

CONCLUSIONS

ER-/PR+ subtype had a high proportion of stage IV patients. Meanwhile, such subtype breast cancer had similar clinicopathological characteristics, metastatic models (prefers to visceral metastasis), similar even worse prognosis compared with TNBC.

Whole Skeletal Mean SUV Measured on 18F-NaF PET/CT Studies as a Prognostic Indicator in Patients with Bone Metastatic Breast Cancer

In this work we assessed the association between the whole skeletal mean standardized uptake value (SUV) measured on 18F-NaF PET/CT studies and the overall survival (OS) of bone metastatic breast cancer patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 176 patients with breast cancer and bone metastatic disease who performed 18F-NaF PET/CT studies. The outcomes of the patients (dead or alive) were established based on the last information available on their files. The mean and maximum SUVs were measured in a whole skeletal volume of interest (wsVOI). The wsVOI was defined based on the CT component of the PET/CT study using Hounsfield Units thresholds. The wsVOI was then applied on the 18F-NaF PET image. Univariate analyses were performed to assess the association of the SUVs with OS. We also analyzed the association of the age of the patients, the presence of visceral metastatic disease, histological subtypes, presence of hormone receptors, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression and the creatinine, CA15-3 and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels with OS. The variables statistically significant in the univariate analyses were included in a multivariate cox regression survival analysis. Results: In the univariate analyses there were associations of the mean and maximum whole skeletal SUVs, estrogen receptor status and the CA15-3 and ALP levels with OS. In the multivariate analysis, all the variables that were statistically significant in the univariate analysis but the CA15-3 were associated with OS. Conclusion: In patients with bone metastatic breast cancer, the whole skeletal mean SUV is an independent predictor of overall survival.

The Prognosis of Single Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Stratified by HER2 Status

Single estrogen receptor (ER)+ and progesterone receptor (PR)+ tumors account for about10% of all breast cancers. However, the prognosis of these single hormone receptor-positive (HR+) tumor remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the characteristics of single HR+ breast tumors according to HER2 status in order to improve the treatment of patients with single HR+. Patients from the SEER program (2010-2016) were divided into ER+PR-, ER-PR+, ER+PR+ and ER-PR- molecular subtypes stratified by HER2 status. Overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were compared by Kaplan–Meier curves after propensity score matching (PSM). A total of 203,406 patients were enrolled. Single ER+ and PR+ tumors account for 11.9% of the total population. For HER2- subtype, patients with ER+PR- (n = 16906 pairs) and ER-PR+ (n = 1395 pairs) had worse prognoses than those with ER+PR+ with hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.52 (1.41-1.64) and 2.25 (1.76-2.88) for OS; and 1.94 (1.76-2.14) and 2.57 (1.94-3.40) for BCSS, respectively; ER+PR- showed a better prognosis than ER-PR+ (n = 1394 pairs) and ER-PR- (n = 9626 pairs) with HR (95% CI) of 1.32 (1.06-1.65) and 1.44 (1.33-1.55) for OS, and 1.32 (1.03-1.69) and 1.46 (1.34-1.60) for BCSS, respectively; ER-PR+ had a similar prognosis relative to ER-PR- (n = 1395 pairs) after PSM. For HER2+ subtype, patients with ER-PR+, ER+PR-, and ER-PR- had similar OS and BCSS; ER+PR+ showed a similar prognosis compare with ER-PR+ (n = 535 pairs), but had better OS and BCSS than ER+PR- (n = 5376 pairs) and ER-PR- (n = 8143 pairs) after PSM. In addition, ER+PR+HER2+ showed similar OS and better BCSS compared with ER+PR+HER2- after PSM. In conclusion, single PR+ patients experienced poorer prognoses than single ER+ patients, and may be treated as ER-PR- patients in HER2- subtype. In HER2+ patients, both single ER+ and single PR+ cases showed similar prognoses compared with ER-PR- cases, and may be treated as ER-PR- patients.