A Phase II Study of Regorafenib With a Lower Starting Dose in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Exposure-Toxicity Analysis of Unbound Regorafenib and Its Active Metabolites (RESET Trial)

Real-world dosing patterns of regorafenib for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Spain: the RE-SEARCH study

PURPOSE

To describe the dosing patterns of regorafenib in a real-world population of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a routine clinical practice setting in Spain, focusing on the starting dose of regorafenib.

METHODS

An observational, retrospective, multicenter study that included patients ≥ 18 years old who had histologically documented mCRC and who had initiated treatment with regorafenib since January 2017. Post hoc categorization of dosing patterns revealed the following: initial dose < 160 mg and dose escalation, initial dose < 160 mg and maintenance, initial dose equal to 160 mg and maintenance, and initial dose equal to 160 mg and dose reduction.

RESULTS

Most patients (152/241, 63.8%) initiated treatment with regorafenib at doses < 160 mg. There was large variation in the starting dose of regorafenib over time: in 2017, most patients (59%) initiated regorafenib at a dose of 160 mg, this proportion decreased to 6% in 2021. There were no significant differences in the median progression-free survival according to the regorafenib dose patterns during the first two cycles. The proportion of patients who reported at least one adverse event (AE), had a grade 3-4 AE or had an AE leading to dose reduction was greater in the group of patients who received an initial dose equal to 160 and reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that physicians in Spain have gradually adopted a dose-escalation approach during cycle 1, which is a common practice for starting treatment with a reduced dose (< 160 mg/day), a strategy that seems to improve tolerability while maintaining efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

Association between albumin-bilirubin grade and plasma trough concentrations of regorafenib and its metabolites M-2 and M-5 at steady-state in Japanese patients

The aim of the present study was to determine whether the trough plasma concentrations (C0) of regorafenib and its metabolites, the N-oxide metabolite (M-2) and the desmethyl N-oxide metabolite (M-5), in 21 patients receiving regorafenib therapy were affected by albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade. Regorafenib was administered at dosages ranging from 40 to 160 mg once daily on a 3-week-on, 1-week-off cycle. C0 values of regorafenib and its major metabolites were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography on day 8 after treatment initiation. The C0 values of regorafenib and metabolites M-2 and M-5 were significantly lower in patients with ALBI grade 2 as compared with grade 1 (P = 0.023, 0.003 and 0.017, respectively). The total C0 of regorafenib and its metabolites was significantly higher in ALBI grade 1 patients relative to grade 2 (3.489 μg/mL vs. 1.48 μg/mL; P = 0.009). The median relative dose intensity (RDI) of patients categorized as ALBI grade 2 was significantly lower than that of grade 1 patients (21.9% vs. 62.9%; P = 0.006). In 15 colorectal cancer patients among the total 21 patients, patients with ALBI grade 2 (n = 9) had a significantly shorter median overall survival time than patients with grade 1 (n = 6; P = 0.013). Administering a low dose of regorafenib to patients with ALBI grade 2 reduces the RDI of regorafenib and lowers treatment efficacy, as an appropriate C0 of regorafenib is not maintained. Monitoring the C0 of regorafenib regularly is necessary to guide dose adjustment.

Appropriate dose of regorafenib based on body weight of colorectal cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Previous randomized studies have shown a survival benefit of using regorafenib but a high rate of adverse events in unresectable colorectal cancer patients. To reduce these adverse events and improve the tolerability, we examined the appropriate dose of regorafenib based on body weight.

METHODS

We used a nationwide claims database in Japan and examined the efficacy and safety of regorafenib for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer between groups divided by body weight (60 kg) and median average dose (120 mg) between 2013 and 2018. We also assessed overall survival (OS) and adverse events between these groups.

RESULTS

We identified 2530 Japanese patients (heavy weight/high dose: 513, light weight/low dose: 921, heavy weight/low dose: 452, and light weight/high dose: 644). There was no significant difference in the adverse events and OS after inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) adjustment between heavy weight/high dose group and light weight/low dose group (hazard ratio, HR=0.97). Among the light-weight patients, higher average dose was associated with shorter OS (IPTW adjusted HR=1.21, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.39, Table 3) while among the heavy-weight patients, there was no significant difference in OS between high and low dose groups (IPTW adjusted HR=1.14, 95% CI 0.95 - 1.37).

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that a low dose of regorafenib for light-weight patients may be as safe and effective as high doses for heavy-weight patients. Further studies should be conducted to identify an appropriate dose based on each patient's physique and condition.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Kinase Inhibitors in Oncology

Although kinase inhibitors (KI) frequently portray large interpatient variability, a 'one size fits all' regimen is still often used. In the meantime, relationships between exposure-response and exposure-toxicity have been established for several KIs, so this regimen could lead to unnecessary toxicity and suboptimal efficacy. Dose adjustments based on measured systemic pharmacokinetic levels-i.e., therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-could therefore improve treatment efficacy and reduce the incidence of toxicities. Therefore, the aim of this comprehensive review is to give an overview of the available evidence for TDM for the 77 FDA/EMA kinase inhibitors currently approved (as of July 1st, 2023) used in hematology and oncology. We elaborate on exposure-response and exposure-toxicity relationships for these kinase inhibitors and provide practical recommendations for TDM and discuss corresponding pharmacokinetic targets when possible.

Efficacy of aluminum chloride in severe regorafenib-associated hand-foot skin reactions: a single-arm trial

BACKGROUND

Regorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, causes a high frequency of hand-foot skin reactions (HFSRs). The present study evaluated the efficacy of topical aluminum chloride, a perspiration suppressant, in reducing the severity of hand-foot skin reactions (HFSRs) caused by regorafenib.

METHODS

The present single-arm study included patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving regorafenib. Aluminum chloride ointment was applied topically one week prior to the start of regorafenib treatment, and the observation period was 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the incidence of regorafenib-related grade 3 HFSR. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of all grades of HFSR, time to any grade of HFSR, time to improvement from grade 2 or higher to grade 1 or lower, treatment discontinuation rate, treatment interruption rate or dosage reduction due to HFSR, and incidence of adverse effects of aluminum chloride.

RESULTS

In total 28 patients were enrolled, and 27 patients were analyzed. The incidence of grade 3 HFSR was 7.4%, meeting the primary endpoint. The incidence of all grades of HFSR was 66.7%, and the median time to the occurrence of any grade of HFSR was 15 days. No patients discontinued or reduced the regorafenib dosage because of HFSR. The most common reason for the interruption of regorafenib therapy was liver dysfunction in nine patients (33%) and HFSR in three patients (11%). No serious adverse events related to aluminum chloride were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Aluminum chloride ointment, a drug commonly used in routine practice to treat hyperhidrosis, is safe to use, has no serious side effects, and may be effective in reducing the occurrence of severe, regorafenib-related HFSR.

TRAIL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov. identifier: jRCTs031180096, Registered on 25/01/2019.

Phase II dose titration study of regorafenib in progressive unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer

Regorafenib has shown significant survival benefit as a salvage therapy for colorectal cancer; however, its starting dose has been controversial in recent studies. Therefore, we conducted a prospective study on the efficacy and safety of the dose reduction of regorafenib to 120 mg. Patients received 120 mg regorafenib once per day for 3 weeks, followed by a 1-week off-treatment period. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed disease control rate (DCR). Sixty patients were registered, and the DCR was 38.3% with a median progression-free survival of 2.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-3.7) and median overall survival of 10.0 months (95% CI 6.9-15.2). Common grade 3-4 adverse events were hand-foot skin reaction and hypertension (20.0% each). The results of administration of 120 mg regorafenib as the starting dose are consistent with reports from prior phase III trials, which used starting doses of 160 mg. This lower initiating dose of regorafenib may be beneficial to certain patient populations. This clinical trial was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR number UMIN000018968, registration date: 10/09/2015).

Prospective evaluation of the relationship between response and exposure of total and unbound erlotinib in non-small cell lung cancer patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relationship between treatment efficacy and exposure of total and unbound erlotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor naïve NSCLC patients were enrolled, and erlotinib was started at 150 mg/day. Total and unbound exposure of erlotinib were prospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 70 enrolled patients, 61 had EGFR-activating mutations (30 patients with exon 19 deletions, 31 patients with L858R). The median area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC_0-24) of total and unbound erlotinib on day 1 was 37,004 ng·h/mL (range, 9683-63,257 ng·h/mL) and 2338 ng·h/mL (581-5904 ng·h/mL), respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.9 months, and PFS did not differ between each tertile of total and unbound AUC_0-24 on day 1 in 59 patients with EGFR-activating mutations. The worst grade of skin toxicities was significantly correlated with total trough concentration at steady state (C_trough,ss) at each visit for 3 months after the initiation of erlotinib treatment (P < 0.0001). Total and unbound C_trough,ss on day 7-15 in 20 patients whose dose was reduced due to intolerable toxicities was significantly higher than those in 48 patients whose dose was unchanged for 3 months (P = 0.0046, 0.0008).

CONCLUSION

The lack of relationship between efficacy and exposure of total and unbound erlotinib demonstrates that the standard dose of 150 mg/day is sufficient for the treatment of NSCLC harboring EGFR-activating mutations, despite wide inter-individual variability in exposure and dose reduction.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000012862.

Impact of trough concentrations of regorafenib and its major metabolites M-2 and M-5 on overall survival of chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients: Results from a multicentre GERCOR TEXCAN phase II study

PURPOSE

This prospective pharmacokinetic (PK) ancillary study of the TEXCAN phase II GERCOR trial of patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer and treated with regorafenib (REGO) investigated correlations between overall survival (OS) and concentrations (C) of REGO and its active metabolites, M-2 and M-5.

METHODS

55 patients received REGO 160 mg/day for 21 days of a 28-day cycle (NCT02699073). REGO, M-2, M-5 were measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay on day 15 of cycle 1 (C1) and 2 (C2). We studied the association between OS and Cmin of REGO, M-2 and M-5 at C1 and their accumulations between C1 and C2.

RESULTS

Medians of C2/C1 M-2 and M-5 ratios were 0.82 (interquartile range 0.50-1.78) and 0.75 (interquartile range 0.41-1.93), respectively. Patients with C2/C1 M-2 ratio ≥ median had improved survival compared to those < median (12.6 versus 4.0 months, P = 0.023), corresponding to a 66% mortality risk reduction in multivariate analysis. The C2/C1 M-2 ratio correlated with C1 REGO+M-2+M-5 (Csum; P = 0.006). Restricted cubic spline analysis showed an increased OS benefit as the C2/C1 M-2 ratio raises and when C1 Csum ranged between 2.5 and 5.5 mg/L. Patients within the Csum range had a reduced incidence of serious adverse events and improved OS.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified PK parameters associated with a survival benefit in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated by REGO. OS and safety were favourable when C1 REGO+M-2+M-5 Csum ranged between 2.5 and 5.5 mg/L. These results pave the way for individual REGO dose modification strategies based on PK monitoring.

CLINICAL TRIAL REFERENCE

NCT02699073.

Efficacy and safety of regorafenib dose-escalation therapy for Japanese patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (RECC study)

BACKGROUND

Regorafenib significantly improves overall survival in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer patients. However, various toxicities, such as hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), fatigue, and liver dysfunction have limited the use of regorafenib. These toxicities appear soon after treatment initiation. The ReDOS study demonstrated the effectiveness of a weekly dose-escalation therapy of regorafenib starting with a lower daily dose; however, its usefulness in Asian subjects is unknown. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the safety and survival benefit of regorafenib dose-escalation therapy for Japanese patients.

METHODS

Patients with sufficient organ function, who had previously received more than two lines of chemotherapy were included. Regorafenib was started at 80 mg/day and escalated to 120 mg/day in Week 2 and 160 mg/day in Week 3, if no severe drug-related toxicities were observed. The primary endpoint was cancer progression-free survival (PFS). Tumor response and progression were assessed radiologically every 8 weeks. This study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN#UMIN000028933).

RESULTS

57 patients were enrolled and all started regorafenib at 80 mg/day. 32 patients (56.1%) were subsequently escalated to 120 mg/day and 19 (33.3%) to 160 mg/day. Only 8 patients (14.0%) discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Median PFS was 1.9 months. Median overall survival was 8.9 months, the response rate was 0%, and the disease control rate was 31.6%. The most frequent adverse event greater than grade 3 was hypertension (19.3%), followed by HFSR (14.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Regorafenib dose-escalation therapy is well tolerated with PFS-like regorafenib standard therapy.

Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in Japanese patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Regorafenib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor that has been established as third-line treatment for patients after the failure of imatinib and sunitinib. However, since clinical data of regorafenib in the Japanese population are still lacking, the management of regorafenib is mainly based on the clinical experience of each oncologist. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib in a Japanese population.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients treated with regorafenib for metastatic and recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors were retrospectively enrolled. This study investigated the anti-tumor effect, including overall survival, progression-free survival, and safety, which was evaluated based on the incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

The median overall survival of patients treated with regorafenib was 23.8 months and the 1-year overall survival rate was 80.0%, the median progression-free survival was 7.1 months and the 1-year progression-free survival rate was 40.2%. The responses to regorafenib were partial response in 3 cases (9.1%), stable disease in 17 (51.5%), progressive disease in 10 (30.3%), and non-evaluable in 3 (9.1%). The disease control rate was 54.0%. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in all patients, with the most common being hand-foot syndrome (72.7%), followed by liver damage (36.4%) and diarrhea (27.3%), and six patients (20.0%) were discontinued due to adverse events.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report of Japanese patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with regorafenib. Regorafenib showed efficacy and a manageable safety profile in Japanese patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors, which was comparable with previous studies.

Association Between Regorafenib Dose and Efficacy Against Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Real-World Setting

The association between regorafenib dosage in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and efficacy is currently not well established. It was previously reported that the regorafenib dose as prescribed is associated with efficacy, but doses in actual clinical settings have not been analyzed. We retrospectively analyzed patients with mCRC who had received regorafenib as third-line or later chemotherapy between May 2013 and June 2018. Patients who were not treated in the Pharmaceutical Outpatient Clinic for compliance assessment were excluded. Overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors, including baseline demographics and adverse events, were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models. A total of 176 patients were enrolled. By multivariate analysis, total dose until the second cycle < 3180 mg (HR = 1.71, 95% CI, 1.20-2.44, P = .003) was one of independent negative predictors of overall survival. Median survival times of the lower-dose group (< 3180 mg) and higher-dose group (≥ 3180 mg) were 5.8 and 7.6 months, respectively (P = .045). The cumulative dose of regorafenib until the second cycle in patients with mCRC was associated with survival. It is important to individualize regorafenib dose in mCRC patients.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of oral targeted antineoplastic drugs

PURPOSE

This review provides an overview of the current challenges in oral targeted antineoplastic drug (OAD) dosing and outlines the unexploited value of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Factors influencing the pharmacokinetic exposure in OAD therapy are depicted together with an overview of different TDM approaches. Finally, current evidence for TDM for all approved OADs is reviewed.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search (covering literature published until April 2020), including primary and secondary scientific literature on pharmacokinetics and dose individualisation strategies for OADs, together with US FDA Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics Reviews and the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use European Public Assessment Reports was conducted.

RESULTS

OADs are highly potent drugs, which have substantially changed treatment options for cancer patients. Nevertheless, high pharmacokinetic variability and low treatment adherence are risk factors for treatment failure. TDM is a powerful tool to individualise drug dosing, ensure drug concentrations within the therapeutic window and increase treatment success rates. After reviewing the literature for 71 approved OADs, we show that exposure-response and/or exposure-toxicity relationships have been established for the majority. Moreover, TDM has been proven to be feasible for individualised dosing of abiraterone, everolimus, imatinib, pazopanib, sunitinib and tamoxifen in prospective studies. There is a lack of experience in how to best implement TDM as part of clinical routine in OAD cancer therapy.

CONCLUSION

Sub-therapeutic concentrations and severe adverse events are current challenges in OAD treatment, which can both be addressed by the application of TDM-guided dosing, ensuring concentrations within the therapeutic window.

Associations among plasma concentrations of regorafenib and its metabolites, adverse events, and ABCG2 polymorphisms in patients with metastatic colorectal cancers

PURPOSE

The association between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of regorafenib, a multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor, remains unclear. This study assessed the trough plasma concentrations (C_trough) of regorafenib and its N-oxide (M2) and N-oxide/desmethyl (M5) metabolites, and evaluated the associations among these levels, adverse events, and pharmacokinetic-related genetic polymorphisms in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

The C_trough levels of regorafenib and its metabolites were assessed in a single-center, prospective, observational study, 7 days after the initial treatment. The correlation between those values and adverse events was then examined. In addition, the genetic polymorphisms of ABCG2, SLCO1B1, and UGT1A9 were determined and evaluated for associations with the levels of regorafenib, M2, and M5.

RESULTS

We analyzed 43 patients who received regorafenib 40-120 mg/day; among them, 35 patients started at 120 mg/day. With regard to bilirubin increase, the C_trough values of regorafenib were significantly higher in the group with grade ≥ 2 than in groups with grades 0 and 1 (p = 0.010). The M5 C_trough levels were significantly associated with the severity of hypertension or rash (p < 0.05). In a multivariate analysis, the M5 C_trough values and age were significant predictors of severe rash. Lastly, significant differences were noted in the M5 concentration-to-dose ratio values between the patients with ABCG2 421A/A and ABCG2 421C/A or C/C polymorphisms (p = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the C_trough of regorafenib was associated with bilirubin increase, and also clarified for the first time that the C_trough of M5 was significantly correlated with hypertension and severe rash.

Practical considerations in the use of regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer

Over the past 20 years, management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has improved considerably, leading to increased overall survival and more patients eligible for third- or later-line therapy. Currently, two oral therapies are recommended in the third-line treatment of mCRC, regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil. Selecting the most appropriate treatment in the third-line setting poses different challenges compared with treatment selection at earlier stages. Therefore, it is important for physicians to understand and differentiate between available treatment options and to communicate the benefits and challenges of these to patients. In this narrative review, practical information on regorafenib is provided to aid physicians in their decision-making and patient communications in daily practice. We discuss the importance of appropriate patient selection and adverse events management through close patient monitoring and dose adjustments to ensure patients stay on treatment for longer and receive as much benefit as possible. We also highlight key physician-patient communication points to facilitate shared decision-making.