Long-Term Safety With Axitinib in Previously Treated Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Impact of Therapy Management on Axitinib-Related Adverse Events in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving First-Line Axitinib + Checkpoint Inhibitor

INTRODUCTION

There are limited real-world data on the effectiveness of strategies used to manage adverse events (AEs) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with axitinib. This retrospective chart review examined the AE profile and effect of axitinib modifications on AE resolution/improvement and treatment discontinuation.

METHODS

A retrospective physician-administered chart review was conducted. Adult patients with advanced RCC treated with first-line axitinib plus checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy (ie, avelumab or pembrolizumab) and who had documented frequently reported axitinib-related AEs of fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, hypertension, or palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia were included. Physician characteristics, patient characteristics, AE characteristics, AE management strategies used, AE resolution/improvement, and treatment duration were described. The effect of strategies used to manage AEs (axitinib dose reduction or treatment interruption) on AE resolution/improvement was evaluated by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 219 patients (median age: 62 years, 65% male), 70 (32%) were treated with axitinib + avelumab and 149 (68%) received axitinib + pembrolizumab. Axitinib modifications increased the likelihood of AE resolution/improvement compared with no modifications (adjusted odds ratio: 6.34, P < .001). In the subset of patients who discontinued treatment among those with or without axitinib modifications, mean treatment duration was 7.0 and 1.7 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Toxicities experienced by patients with advanced RCC treated with first-line axitinib-CPI in the real world can be effectively managed by axitinib modifications, thereby prolonging treatment duration. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04682587).

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and atherosclerosis: A close but complicated relationship

Targeted cancer therapies have revolutionized the treatment of the disease in the past decade. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) class of drugs is a widely used option for treating various cancers. Despite numerous advances, clinical and experimental studies have demonstrated the atherosclerosis-inducing properties of these drugs that can cause adverse cardiovascular events. TKIs also have an atherosclerosis-preventing role in patients with cancer through different mechanisms under various conditions, suggesting that specific drugs play different roles in atherosclerosis regulation. Given these contradictory properties, this review summarizes the outcomes of previously performed clinical and basic experiments and shows how the targeted effects of novel TKIs affect atherosclerosis. Future collaborative efforts are warranted to enhance our understanding of the association between TKIs and atherosclerosis.

A real-world pharmacovigilance study of axitinib: data mining of the public version of FDA adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND

Axitinib was approved for treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The current study was to assess axitinib-related adverse events (AEs) through data mining of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

METHODS

Disproportionality analyses, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms, were employed to quantify the signals of axitinib-associated AEs.

RESULTS

Out of 10,703,806 reports collected from the FAERS database, 9044 reports of axitinib as the 'primary suspected (PS)' AEs were identified. Axitinib induced AEs occurrence targeted 26 organ systems. A total of 95 significant disproportionality PTs conforming to the four algorithms were simultaneously retained. Rare reports and significant signals of aortic disease have emerged. Unexpected significant AEs such as scrotal swelling, scrotal ulcers, infections, and infestations might also occur. The median onset time of axitinib-associated AEs was 63.5 days (interquartile range [IQR] 20-182 days), and most of the cases occurred within the first one and 2 months after axitinib initiation.

CONCLUSION

Our study found potential new AEs signals and might provide important support for clinical monitoring and risk identification of axitinib.

The Impact of Renal Impairment on Survival Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Purpose:

It remained unclear whether tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) related renal impairment had impact on the survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

Methods:

Clinicopathological parameters of patients with mRCC treated with TKIs were retrospectively reviewed. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN), proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline and during TKIs treatment were recorded. BUN > 7.1mol/L, eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73m² and/or proteinuria level > 0.3 g/L were defined as renal impairment. eGFR and proteinuria were furtherly classified into different levels. Treatment outcomes were defined as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results:

At baseline, the presence of abnormal BUN, eGFR and proteinuria level were observed in 25 (22.7%), 27 (25.5%) and 30 (27.3%) patients, which increased to 46 (41.8%), 55 (50.0%) and 64 (58.2%) respectively after TKIs treatment. In the whole cohort (N = 110), survival analysis suggested that only post-treatment renal impairment was related to survival outcomes. Interestingly, sub-analysis showed that post-treatment eGFR level (p = 0.004), proteinuria (p = 0.014) and eGFR decrease >10% (p = 0.012) and elevated proteinuria compared with baseline (p = 0.006) were statistically correlated with OS among patients without RI at baseline (N = 51). On the contrary, deterioration of renal impairment after TKIs treatment in patients with renal impairment at baseline (N = 59) had no relationship with either PFS or OS. Furthermore, eGFR (p = 0.020) and eGFR decrease >10% (p = 0.016) within 1 year after TKIs therapy were potential biomarkers for OS.

Conclusion:

Dynamic changes of TKI-induced RI during TKIs treatment, especially eGFR and proteinuria level, could be considered as potential biomarkers predicting survival outcomes of mRCC patients.

Potential of substituted quinazolines to interact with multiple targets in the treatment of cancer

The efficacy of quinazoline-based antiglioma agents has been attributed to their effects on microtubule dynamics.1,2 The design, synthesis and biological evaluation of quinazolines as potent inhibitors of multiple intracellular targets, including microtubules and multiple RTKs, is described. In addition to the known ability of quinazolines 1 and 2 to cause microtubule depolymerization, they were found to be low nanomolar inhibitors of EGFR, VEGFR-2 and PDGFR-β. Low nanomolar inhibition of EGFR was observed for 1-3 and 9-10. Compounds 1 and 4 inhibited VEGFR-2 kinase with activity better than or equal to that of sunitinib. In addition, compounds 1 and 2 had similar potency to sunitinib in the CAM angiogenesis assay. Multitarget activities of compounds in the present study demonstrates that the quinazolines can affect multiple pathways and could lead to these agents having antitumor potential caused by their activity against multiple targets.

Absorption of the orally active multikinase inhibitor axitinib as a therapeutic index to guide dose titration in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Purpose Axitinib is an orally active multikinase inhibitor currently used to treat patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This study examined the pharmacokinetics of axitinib and the relationship between peak drug concentration (C_max) and clinical outcomes in real-world practice. Methods Twenty patients with metastatic RCC treated with axitinib monotherapy were enrolled. Post-dose (1-4 h) blood samples were obtained, and axitinib C_max in plasma was measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Efficacy endpoints were best overall response (per RECIST 1.1) and progression-free survival (PFS). The safety endpoint was the cumulative incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Results Large inter- and intra-individual variability in dose-adjusted C_max was observed (0.02-11.2 ng/mL/mg). Axitinib absorption was significantly influenced by glucuronidation activity (P = 0.040). C_max at steady state was significantly higher in responders than in non-responders (P = 0.013). The optimal C_max cutoff to predict a clinical response was 12.4 ng/mL. The median PFS was significantly longer in patients who achieved an average steady state C_max above the threshold than in those who did not (799 vs. 336 days; P = 0.047). The cumulative incidence of DLTs was significantly higher in patients with C_max ≥ 40.2 ng/mL than in other patients (sub-hazard ratio, 4.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-13.5; P = 0.019). Conclusions The potential therapeutic window of axitinib C_max in metastatic RCC was estimated at 12.4-40.2 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetically guided dose titration using therapeutic drug monitoring may improve the efficacy and safety of axitinib, warranting further investigation in a larger patient population.

Cardiovascular toxicity induced by anti-VEGF/VEGFR agents: a special focus on definitions, diagnoses, mechanisms and management

INTRODUCTION

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key target in cancer therapy. However, cardiovascular safety has been one of the most challenging aspects of anti-VEGF/VEGF receptor (VEGFR) agent development and therapy. While accurate diagnostic modalities for assessment of cardiac function have been developed over the past few decades, a lack of an optimal definition and precise mechanism still places a significant limit on the effective management of cardiovascular toxicity.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we report the cardiovascular toxicity profile associated with anti-VEGF/VEGFR agents and summarize the clinical diagnoses as well as management that are already performed in clinical practice or are currently being investigated. Furthermore, the review discusses the potential molecular toxicological mechanisms, which may provide strategies to prevent toxicity and drive drug discovery.

EXPERT OPINION

Cardiovascular toxicity associated with anti-VEGF/VEGFR agents has been a substantial risk for cancer treatment. To improve its management, the development of guidelines for prevention, monitoring and treatment of cardiovascular toxicity has become a hot topic. The summary of cardiovascular toxicity profile, mechanisms and management given in this review is not only significant for the optimal use of existing anti-VEGF/VEGFR agents to protect patients predisposed to cardiovascular toxicity but is also beneficial for drug development.

Metastases to the nose from clear cell renal cell carcinoma: A case report

RATIONALE

Patients with nasal metastases are seldom seen among clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC). We report a rare case presenting as a solitary nasal cutaneous nodule, and summarize the therapeutic experience of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 86-year-old man with a chief complaint of continuous back pain for 3 months and discovery of a cutaneous nodule on the nose for a month visited the oncology department of our hospital. Maxillofacial computed tomography (CT) scans demonstrated a 1.5 × 0.9 cm and ovoid soft tissue density shade at dorsum of the nose. CT of abdomen revealed a 3.5 × 2.7 cm mass in right kidney and presenting an obvious heterogeneous enhancement.

DIAGNOSES

The pathological examination of nasal excision biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of nasal clear cell carcinoma. Immunohistochemical analysis indicated that the nasal metastatic tumor had a renal origin.

INTERVENTIONS

Sunitinib at a dose of 50 mg/day was administered initially, while the serious cutaneous toxicities, especially hand-foot syndrome, occurred to the patient. Subsequently, axitinib at a dose of 5 mg twice daily was accepted as second-line treatment.

OUTCOMES

The nasal mass shrinked significantly after 8-week treatment of axitinib, and the primary tumor has been stable till now.

LESSONS

Axitinib successfully controlled the nasal cutaneous metastasis with mild adverse reactions, and did not aggravate the cutaneous toxicities resulting from sunitinib. The incidence of cutaneous adverse events were low which had been reported by previous studies; however, it is difficult to say that axitinib is a more effective treatment modality for RCC with nasal metastases, which requires further studies.

Immune consequences of anti-angiogenic therapyin renal cell carcinoma

Current therapies of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), a highly vascularised tumour, mostly rely on anti-angiogenic treatment options. These include tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies. Although these strategies aim at restraining vascularisation to control tumour growth, the effects of such therapies are much wider, as affecting the vessel structure deeply modifies the microenvironment of the tumour mass. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of current knowledge on the global effects of anti-angiogenic treatment, mostly TKIs, on the shaping of the immune component of the RCC microenvironment. The data supporting the modification of immunity by anti-angiogenic therapies are collected to reveal the potential of angiogenesis modulation as a strategy for the adjuvant anti-cancer approach in immunotherapy.

Individualized dosing with axitinib: rationale and practical guidance

Axitinib is a potent, selective, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy as second-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Analyses of axitinib drug exposures have demonstrated high interpatient variability in patients receiving the 5 mg twice-daily (b.i.d.) starting dose. Clinical criteria can be used to assess whether individual patients may benefit further from dose modifications, based on their safety and tolerability data. This review provides practical guidance on the 'flexible dosing' method, to help physicians identify who would benefit from dose escalations, dose reductions or continuation with manageable toxicity at the 5 mg b.i.d. dose. This flexible approach allows patients to achieve the best possible outcomes without compromising safety.

Axitinib in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma: design, development, and place in therapy

Since 2005, the approved first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma consists in tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs). Axitinib is an oral second-generation TKI and a potent VEGFR inhibitor with a half maximal inhibitory concentration for the VEGF family receptors 10-fold lower than other TKIs. Axitinib activity in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients has been studied in various settings and particularly as second-line treatment. In this setting, axitinib with clinically based dose escalation compared to sorafenib has demonstrated an improvement in progression-free survival in a randomized Phase III trial leading to US Food and Drug Administration approval. In the first-line setting, axitinib failed to demonstrate improved efficacy over sorafenib, but the field of RCC treatment is rapidly changing with novel TKIs as cabozantinib or the emergence of check point inhibitors as nivolumab and the place of axitinib in therapy is therefore challenged. In this review, we focus on axitinib pharmacological and clinical properties in RCC patients and discuss its place in the treatment of patients with RCC.

Axitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: beyond the second-line setting

Treatment options for advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma have advanced considerably in the past decade with the approval of several targeted agents, including axitinib. Axitinib is a potent and selective inhibitor of VEGFRs 1-3, and is well established as second-line treatment. This article summarizes factors to be considered when administering axitinib, such as individualized dose titration and axitinib-associated adverse events, in order to retain patients longer on treatment, which would likely lead to improved efficacy outcomes. In addition, potential clinical perspectives for axitinib beyond the second-line setting, including its role in the first-line setting, sequential therapy, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, and combination therapy with immunotherapy, in particular, immune checkpoint inhibitors, are discussed.

Assessment of pazopanib-related hypertension, cardiac dysfunction and identification of clinical risk factors for their development

BACKGROUND

Antineoplastic therapy with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor pazopanib in patients with advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been associated with hypertension (HTN), cardiomyopathy, and cardiac dysrhythmias. We therefore assessed the cardiovascular (CV) risk with pazopanib in a clinical setting.

METHODS

Medical records of 35 antineoplastic-naïve mRCC patients newly started on pazopanib were retrospectively reviewed at a single academic medical center. Assessment of the hypertensive response and adverse cardiac events associated with pazopanib was the primary objective. Outcomes were defined using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. Potential clinical risk factors were investigated with univariate and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Pazopanib-induced HTN was observed in 57% of patients. Median maximal systolic blood pressure (SBP) during pazopanib treatment was 167.5 mmHg with median time to event of 24.5 days. New-onset HTN occurred in 6/14 (43%) patients. Baseline SBP > 130 mmHg (odds ratio [OR]: 5.32; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-29.99; p = 0.058) and ACEi/ARB use (OR: 4.88; 95% CI: 1.05 22.84; p = 0.044) were risk factors for pazopanib-induced HTN. When HTN was excluded, 34% of patients developed a CV adverse event. Age ≥ 60 years (OR: 8.72; 95% CI: 0.74-513.26; p = 0.105) trended towards being a predictor for a non-HTN CV adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that pazopanib has a broad CV toxicity profile in treatment-naïve mRCC patients headlined by a rapid and striking hypertensive response. More intensive BP control prior to starting pazopanib and standardization of CV surveillance particularly in older patients may optimize oncologic care while minimizing CV risk.

Influence of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors on Hypertension and Nephrotoxicity in Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Patients

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common kidney malignancies. An upgraded comprehension of the molecular biology implicated in the development of cancer has stimulated an increase in research and development of innovative antitumor therapies. The aim of the study was to analyze the medical literature for hypertension and renal toxicities as the adverse events of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathway inhibitor (anti-VEGF) therapy. Relevant studies were identified in PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Eligible studies were phase III and IV prospective clinical trials, meta-analyses and retrospective studies that had described events of hypertension or nephrotoxicity for patients who received anti-VEGF therapy. A total of 48 studies were included in the systematic review. The incidence of any grade hypertension ranged from 17% to 49.6%. Proteinuria and increased creatinine levels were ascertained in 8% to 73% and 5% to 65.6% of patients, respectively. These adverse events are most often mild in severity but may sometimes lead to treatment discontinuation. Nephrotoxicity and hypertension are related to multiple mechanisms; however, one of the main disturbances in those patients is VEGF inhibition. There is a significant risk of developing hypertension and renal dysfunction among patients receiving anti-VEGF treatment; however, there is also some evidence that these side effects may be used as biomarkers of response to antiangiogenic agents.

Axitinib: a review in advanced renal cell carcinoma

Axitinib (Inlyta(®)) is a potent, selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1, -2 and -3. This article reviews the clinical efficacy and tolerability of axitinib in patients with previously-treated advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as well as summarizing its pharmacological properties. Axitinib was effective in the second-line treatment of advanced RCC, according to the results of the pivotal, phase III AXIS trial. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly prolonged with axitinib versus sorafenib (primary endpoint; independent review committee assessment); this PFS benefit was seen in patients who had received prior treatment with cytokines or sunitinib. The objective response rate was also significantly higher with axitinib than with sorafenib, with no significant between-group difference in median overall survival. Axitinib had a manageable tolerability profile in the AXIS trial, with the most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events including diarrhoea, hypertension, fatigue, decreased appetite, nausea, dysphonia, hand-foot syndrome and hypothyroidism. In conclusion, axitinib is an important option in previously-treated patients with advanced RCC.

Medical treatment of renal cancer: new horizons

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) makes up 2-3% of adult cancers. The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in the mid-2000s radically changed the management of RCC. These targeted treatments superseded immunotherapy with interleukin-2 and interferon. The pendulum now appears to be shifting back towards immunotherapy, with the evidence of prolonged overall survival of patients with metastatic RCC on treatment with the anti-programmed cell death 1 ligand monoclonal antibody, nivolumab. Clinical prognostic criteria aid prediction of relapse risk for resected localised disease. Unfortunately, for patients at high risk of relapse, no adjuvant treatment has yet shown benefit, although further trials are yet to report. Clinical prognostic models also have a role in the management of advanced disease; now there is a pressing need for predictive biomarkers to direct therapy. Treatment selection for metastatic disease is currently based on histology, prognostic group and patient preference based on side effect profile. In this article, we review the current medical and surgical management of localised, oligometastatic and advanced RCC, including side effect management and the evidence base for management of poor-risk and non-clear cell disease. We discuss recent results from clinical trials and how these are likely to shape future practice and a renaissance of immunotherapy for renal cell cancer.

Safety of available treatment options for renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

For many years, cytokines (high-dose interleukin (IL)-2 and interferon (IFN)) have been the unique available treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and they provided durable but modest responses at the cost of significant toxicities. To date, targeted therapies have replaced cytokine therapy due to higher response rates and more favorable toxicity profiles. The major classes of targeted therapy for mRCC include tyrosine kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial grow factors and inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin. Thanks to these new strategies, the prognosis for the mRCC is shifting toward a chronic disease and the new challenges are the adequate treatment of adverse events (AEs) and the care for quality of life, which is crucial. Emerging immunotherapies targeting the programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor and the programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) ligand have shown promising results in both efficacy and safety profiles.

AREAS COVERED

Safety data published on available treatment options for renal cell carcinoma RCC are reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Various toxicities are associated with targeted agents; these toxicities are generally well tolerated but careful monitoring and appropriate management are needed to optimize the use of these strategies.

Is It Safe to Restart Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma after Cardiac Ischemia?

Agents targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) represent active drugs in treating patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Studies have shown that sunitinib and axitinib can be associated with cardiac toxicity. Whether these agents should be restarted in patients who experience cardiac ischemia remains uncertain. Here, we present three patients with metastatic RCC who restarted sunitinib or axitinib after intervention of active ischemic cardiac disease without causing subsequent relevant cardiac events. This experience suggests that these agents can be continued after management of cardiac ischemia.