1
|
Mollica V, Massari F, Maruzzo M, Bimbatti D, Claps M, Maiorano BA, Vitale MG, Iacovelli R, Ermacora P, Roviello G, Calabrò F, Caffo O, Vignani F, Grillone F, Pierantoni F, Di Napoli M, Mennitto A, Marchetti A, Mattana A, Cavo A, Bassanelli M, Formisano L, Prati V, Giudice GC, Buti S. Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Patients With Penile Carcinoma: A Sub-Analysis From Meet-URO 23 (I-RARE) Registry Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024:102074. [PMID: 38616147 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare tumor with an aggressive behavior. The Meet-URO 23/I-RARE registry includes rare genitourinary malignancies. We extracted patients with PSCC to conduct a retrospective study aimed at assessing clinical outcomes and prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS Primary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival. Prognostic factors for OS and PFS were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis. From the Meet-URO 23/I-RARE database, we extracted 128 patients with diagnosis of PSCC. About 48% of patients underwent first-line of therapy. RESULTS In the overall population, median OS from diagnosis was 34.6 months. Significant differences in median OS were observed according to ECOG PS at diagnosis (57.3 months vs. 8.3 months; P < .001), and median age (≤77y 88.8 months vs. >77y 26 months; P = .013). At multivariate analysis, ECOG PS 2-4 at diagnosis (HR 3.04) and lymph node metastases (HR 2.49) were independently associated with a higher risk of death. Among patients undergoing first-line therapy (n = 61), median OS was 12.3 months, and a statistically significant difference was found according to type of response to first-line (DCR 24.4 months vs. PD 7.1 months; P < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that only age >77 years was associated with a worse OS (HR 2.16). A statistically significant difference in PFS was found according to platinum plus 5-fluorouracil versus platinum plus taxane (4.9 vs. 3.4 months; P = .036) and regimens with 2 versus 3 drugs (3.4 vs. 8.6 months; P = .019). At the multivariate analysis only regimens with platinum plus taxane were associated with worse PFS (HR 2.83). CONCLUSION In our registry study, PSCC is confirmed to be an aggressive disease. Poor ECOG PS, presence of lymph node metastases, and higher age at diagnosis appear to be associated with worse survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica Mollica
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni - 15, Bologna - Italia; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Francesco Massari
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni - 15, Bologna - Italia; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Maruzzo
- Oncology 1 Unit, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Davide Bimbatti
- Oncology 1 Unit, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Melanie Claps
- Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica ed Ematologia, SSD Oncologia Medica Genitourinaria, Programma Prostata, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano
| | | | - Maria Giuseppa Vitale
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41100 Modena, Italy
| | - Roberto Iacovelli
- Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Ermacora
- Dipartimento di Oncologia, Presidio Ospedaliero Universitario Santa Maria della Misericordia, Azienda sanitaria universitaria integrata Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Giandomenico Roviello
- Department of Health Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy
| | - Fabio Calabrò
- Department of Oncology, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Orazio Caffo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Francesca Vignani
- Division of Medical Oncology, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesco Grillone
- UO Oncologia - Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Renato Dulbecco, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Francesco Pierantoni
- Oncology 3 Unit, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Marilena Di Napoli
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessia Mennitto
- SCDU Oncologia, "Maggiore della Carità" University Hospital, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Andrea Marchetti
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni - 15, Bologna - Italia; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alvise Mattana
- Oncology 1 Unit, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Alessia Cavo
- Oncology Unit, Villa Scassi Hospital, Genova, Italy
| | - Maria Bassanelli
- Medical Oncology, 1-IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Formisano
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Veronica Prati
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Michele e Pietro Ferrero, Verduno-Azienda Sanitaria Locale CN2, Alba-Bra, 12060 Cuneo, Italy
| | - Giulia Claire Giudice
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma - Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Buti
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma - Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sachdeva A, McGuinness L, Zapala Ł, Greco I, Garcia-Perdomo HA, Kailavasan M, Antunes-Lopes T, Ayres B, Barreto L, Campi R, Crook J, Johnstone P, Kumar V, Manzie K, Marcus JD, Necchi A, Oliveira P, Osborne J, Pagliaro LC, Protzel C, Bryan Rumble R, Sánchez Martínez DF, Spiess PE, Tagawa ST, van der Heijden MS, Parnham AS, Pettaway CA, Albersen M, Sangar VK, Brouwer OR, Sakalis VI. Management of Lymph Node-positive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol 2024; 85:257-273. [PMID: 37208237 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Lymph node (LN) involvement in penile cancer is associated with poor survival. Early diagnosis and management significantly impact survival, with multimodal treatment approaches often considered in advanced disease. OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical effectiveness of treatment options available for the management of inguinal and pelvic lymphadenopathy in men with penile cancer. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and other databases were searched from 1990 to July 2022. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomised comparative studies (NRCSs), and case series (CSs) were included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We identified 107 studies, involving 9582 patients from two RCTs, 28 NRCSs, and 77 CSs. The quality of evidence is considered poor. Surgery is the mainstay of LN disease management, with early inguinal LN dissection (ILND) associated with better outcomes. Videoendoscopic ILND may offer comparable survival outcomes to open ILND with lower wound-related morbidity. Ipsilateral pelvic LN dissection (PLND) in N2-3 cases improves overall survival in comparison to no pelvic surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in N2-3 disease showed a pathological complete response rate of 13% and an objective response rate of 51%. Adjuvant radiotherapy may benefit pN2-3 but not pN1 disease. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy may provide a small survival benefit in N3 disease. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy improve outcomes after PLND for pelvic LN metastases. CONCLUSIONS Early LND improves survival in nodal disease in penile cancer. Multimodal treatments may provide additional benefit in pN2-3 cases; however, data are limited. Therefore, individualised management of patients with nodal disease should be discussed in a multidisciplinary team setting. PATIENT SUMMARY Spread of penile cancer to the lymph nodes is best managed with surgery, which improves survival and has curative potential. Supplementary treatment, including the use of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, may further improve survival in advanced disease. Patients with penile cancer with lymph node involvement should be treated by a multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwin Sachdeva
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Urology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| | - Luke McGuinness
- Department of Urology, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK
| | - Łukasz Zapala
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Isabella Greco
- Department of Urological Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Herney Andres Garcia-Perdomo
- Division of Urology/Uro-oncology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad Del Valle, Cali, Colombia
| | | | | | - Benjamin Ayres
- Department of Urology, St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lenka Barreto
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Juanita Crook
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada
| | - Peter Johnstone
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Vivek Kumar
- Department of Urology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | | | | | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Urology and Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Pedro Oliveira
- Department of Pathology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Trásos-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal; Veterinary Sciences Department, University of Trásos-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal
| | | | | | | | - R Bryan Rumble
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA
| | | | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Scott T Tagawa
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Arie S Parnham
- Department of Urology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Maarten Albersen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Vijay K Sangar
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Urology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Oscar R Brouwer
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ottenhof SR, de Vries HM, Doodeman B, Vrijenhoek GL, van der Noort V, Donswijk ML, de Feijter JM, Schaake EE, Horenblas S, Brouwer OR, van der Heijden MS, Pos FJ. A Prospective Study of Chemoradiotherapy as Primary Treatment in Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Penile Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:139-147. [PMID: 37030606 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.03.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery for locoregionally advanced penile carcinoma (LAPSCC) is associated with severe toxicity and a 1-year survival probability of ∼50%. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as the primary treatment for LAPSCC and the association of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) with the outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS This was a prospective, single-center, single-arm study of CRT in LAPSCC, defined as a large/inoperable primary tumor, large palpable nodes, suspicion of extranodal extension or pelvic nodal involvement, and no distant metastases. CRT consisted of 49.5 Gy (33 × 1.5 Gy) on affected inguinal and pelvic areas combined with intravenous mitomycin C on day 1 and capecitabine on radiation days. Primary tumors and positron emission tomography/computed tomography-positive deposits received a boost of 59.4 Gy (33 × 1.8 Gy). The response was evaluated by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. If feasible, patients with residual/recurrent disease underwent salvage surgery. The primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), reached when 1-year PFS was ≥50%. Other endpoints were 2-year PFS, overall survival, and toxicity rates. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS Thirty-three patients were included: 29 (88%) with stage IV disease (T4 any-N M0 and/or any-T N3 M0) and 8 (24%) with hrHPV-positive disease. Median follow-up was 41 months. Thirty-two completed CRT. Eleven (33%) experienced ≥1 grade 3 treatment-related adverse event. There were no grade 4 or 5 treatment-related events. Twenty-four patients (73%) responded, including 13 (39%) complete responses. Nine patients (27%) underwent salvage surgery, and an additional 8 patients underwent later surgery (together 52%). One- and 2-year PFS were 34% and 31%, respectively. One- and 2-year overall survival were 73% and 46%, respectively. No significant difference between patients with hrHPV-positive and -negative tumors was observed. CONCLUSIONS CRT is a viable treatment option for LAPSCC with acceptable toxicity. CRT can result in an enduring response. If patients have residual tumor, salvage surgery is feasible. HrHPV status was not associated with outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Barry Doodeman
- Departments of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Maarten Lucas Donswijk
- Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Eva Eline Schaake
- Departments of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simon Horenblas
- Departments of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Floris Jop Pos
- Departments of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hakenberg O, Dräger DL. [Systemic treatment of penile cancer: New concepts? New achievements?]. Aktuelle Urol 2023; 54:304-312. [PMID: 37541237 DOI: 10.1055/a-2104-1418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/06/2023]
Abstract
Systemic chemotherapy has been in use for metastatic penile carcinoma for years, but its success is limited. Its significance is largely associated with its role in multimodal treatment for lymphatic metastasis in the context of radical lymph node surgery. In cases of limited lymph node involvement, the combination of surgical treatment plus cisplatin- and taxane-based triple combinations may be curative. Advances in the understanding of molecular changes in penile cancer and the search for potential therapy targets have led to numerous studies. Although there is evidence of efficacy of immunotherapeutics, no significant therapeutic improvements have been seen in the clinical routine.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ma S, Zhao J, Liu Z, Wu T, Wang S, Wu C, Pan L, Jiang X, Guan Z, Wang Y, Jiao D, Yan F, Zhang K, Tang Q, Ma J. Prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for high-risk cN0 penile cancer: The optimal surgical timing. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1069284. [PMID: 36895485 PMCID: PMC9989449 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1069284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Few reports have investigated the oncologically safe timing of prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer patients with clinically normal inguinal lymph nodes (cN0), particularly those who received delayed surgical treatment. Methods The study included pT1aG2, pT1b-3G1-3 cN0M0 patients with penile cancer who received prophylactic bilateral inguinal lymph nodes dissection (ILND) at the Department of Urology of Tangdu Hospital between October 2002 and August 2019. Patients who received simultaneous resection of primary tumor and inguinal lymph nodes were assigned to the immediate group, while the rest were assigned to the delayed group. The optimal timing of lymphadenectomy was determined based on the time-dependent ROC curves. The disease-specific survival (DSS) was estimated based on the Kaplan-Meier curve. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the associations between DSS and the timing of lymphadenectomy and tumor characteristics. The analyses were repeated after stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment. Results A total of 87 patients were enrolled in the study, 35 of them in the immediate group and 52 in the delayed group. The median (range) interval time between primary tumor resection and ILND of the delayed group was 85 (29-225) days. Multivariable Cox analysis demonstrated that immediate lymphadenectomy was associated with a significant survival benefit (HR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02-0.57; p = 0.009). An index of 3.5 months was determined as the optimal cut-point for dichotomization in the delayed group. In high-risk patients who received delayed surgical treatment, prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy within 3.5 months was associated with a significantly better DSS compared to dissection after 3.5months (77.8% and 0%, respectively; log-rank p<0.001). Conclusions Immediate and prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy in high-risk cN0 patients (pT1bG3 and all higher stage tumours) with penile cancer improves survival. For those patients at high risk who received delayed surgical treatment for any reason, within 3.5 months after resection of the primary tumor seems to be an oncologically safe window for prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanjin Ma
- Department of Urology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
- Department of Urology, The 955th Hospital of Army, Changdu, China
| | - Jian Zhao
- Department of Orthopedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Zhiwei Liu
- Department of Urology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Tao Wu
- Department of Urology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Sheng Wang
- Department of Urology, The 955th Hospital of Army, Changdu, China
| | - Chengwen Wu
- Department of Urology, The 955th Hospital of Army, Changdu, China
| | - Lei Pan
- Department of Urology, The 955th Hospital of Army, Changdu, China
| | - Xiaoye Jiang
- Department of Urology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Zhihao Guan
- Department of Urology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Yanjun Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Dian Jiao
- Department of Urology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Fengqi Yan
- Department of Urology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Keying Zhang
- Department of Urology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Qisheng Tang
- Department of Urology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Jianjun Ma
- Department of Urology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Paz Rojas JF, Ballestas Almario CA, García-Perdomo HA. Effectiveness and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with penile cancer and positive lymph nodes regarding overall survival and free disease survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:200.e11-200.e18. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
7
|
Ma S, Zhang K, Li R, Lu J, Wu T, Liu Z, Fu X, Tang Q, Ma J. Bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy using simultaneous double laparoscopies for penile cancer: A retrospective study. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:112.e1-112.e9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.12.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
8
|
Yi XYL, Cao DH, You PH, Xiong XY, Zheng XN, Peng G, Liao DZ, Li H, Yang L, Ai JZ. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced penile cancer: an updated evidence. Asian J Androl 2021; 24:180-185. [PMID: 34975068 PMCID: PMC8887093 DOI: 10.4103/aja202188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has shown promising results in patients with locally advanced penile cancer. However, no consensus exists on its applications for locally advanced penile cancer. Thus, it is unclear which kind of chemotherapy regimen is the best choice. Consequently, a systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE was performed in March 2021 to assess the efficacy and safety of NAC for the treatment of patients with locally advanced penile cancer. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias in each study. This study synthesized 14 published studies. The study revealed that patients who achieved an objective response to NAC obtained a better survival outcome compared with those who did not achieve an objective response. In addition, the objective response rates (ORRs) and pathological complete response (pCR) rates were 0.57 and 0.11, respectively. The incidence of grade ≥3 toxicity was 0.36. Subgroup analysis found that the ORR and pCR of the taxane–platinum (TP) regimen group performed better than those of the nontaxane–platinum (NTP) regimen group (0.57 vs 0.54 and 0.14 vs 0.07, respectively). Moreover, the TP regimen group had more frequent toxicity than the NTP regimen group (0.41 vs 0.26). However, further studies were warranted to confirm the findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xian-Yan-Ling Yi
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - De-Hong Cao
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Ping-Hong You
- Department of Urology, People's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang 618000, China
| | - Xing-Yu Xiong
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Xiao-Nan Zheng
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Ge Peng
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Da-Zhou Liao
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Hong Li
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Lu Yang
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Jian-Zhong Ai
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Silva JD, Nogueira L, Coelho R, Deus A, Khayat A, Marchi R, Oliveira ED, Santos APD, Cavalli L, Pereira S. HPV-associated penile cancer: Impact of copy number alterations in miRNA/mRNA interactions and potential druggable targets. Cancer Biomark 2021; 32:147-160. [PMID: 34151841 DOI: 10.3233/cbm-210035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Penile cancer (PeCa) is a rare disease, but its incidence has increased worldwide, mostly in HPV+ patients. Nevertheless, there is still no targeted treatment for this carcinoma. OBJECTIVE To predict the main signaling pathways involved in penile tumorigenesis and its potential drug targets. METHODS Genome-wide copy number profiling was performed in 28 PeCa. Integration analysis of CNAs and miRNAs and mRNA targets was performed by DIANA-TarBase v.8. The potential impact of the miRNAs/target genes on biological pathways was assessed by DIANA-miRPath v.3.0. For each miRNA, KEGG pathways were generated based on the tarbase and microT-CDS algorithms. Pharmaco-miR was used to identify associations between miRNAs and their target genes to predict druggable targets. RESULTS 269 miRNAs and 2,395 genes were mapped in cytobands with CNAs. The comparison of the miRNAs mapped at these cytobands and the miRNAs that were predicted to regulate the genes also mapped in these regions, resulted in a set of common 35 miRNAs and 292 genes. Enrichment pathway revealed their involvement in five top signaling pathways. EGFR and COX2 were identified as potential druggable targets. CONCLUSION Our data indicate the potential use of EGFR and COX2 inhibitors as a target treatment for PeCa patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenilson da Silva
- Postgraduate Program in Health Science, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brazil
| | - Leudivan Nogueira
- Postgraduate Program in Health Science, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brazil.,Aldenora Bello Cancer Hospital, São Luís, MA, Brazil
| | - Ronald Coelho
- Aldenora Bello Cancer Hospital, São Luís, MA, Brazil
| | - Amanda Deus
- Postgraduate Program in Health Science, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brazil.,Aldenora Bello Cancer Hospital, São Luís, MA, Brazil
| | - André Khayat
- Oncology Research Center, Federal University of Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil
| | - Rafael Marchi
- Research Institute Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Faculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
| | - Edivaldo de Oliveira
- Tissue Culture and Cytogenetics Laboratory, Institute of Evandro Chagas, Belém, PA, Brazil
| | - Ana Paula Dos Santos
- Department of Physiological Sciences, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brazil
| | - Luciane Cavalli
- Research Institute Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Faculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
| | - Silma Pereira
- Laboratory of Genetics and Molecular Biology, Department of Biology, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Thomas A, Necchi A, Muneer A, Tobias-Machado M, Tran ATH, Van Rompuy AS, Spiess PE, Albersen M. Penile cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2021; 7:11. [PMID: 33574340 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-021-00246-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare cancer with orphan disease designation and a prevalence of 0.1-1 per 100,000 men in high-income countries, but it constitutes up to 10% of malignancies in men in some African, Asian and South American regions. Risk factors for PSCC include the absence of childhood circumcision, phimosis, chronic inflammation, poor penile hygiene, smoking, immunosuppression and infection with human papillomavirus (HPV). Several different subtypes of HPV-related and non-HPV-related penile cancers have been described, which also have different prognostic profiles. Localized disease can be effectively managed by topical therapy, surgery or radiotherapy. As PSCC is characterized by early lymphatic spread and imaging is inadequate for the detection of micrometastatic disease, correct and upfront surgical staging of the inguinal lymph nodes is crucial in disease management. Advanced stages of disease require multimodal management. Optimal sequencing of treatments and patient selection are still being investigated. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens are the mainstay of systemic therapy for advanced PSCC, but they have poor and non-durable responses and high rates of toxic effects, indicating a need for the development of more effective and less toxic therapeutic options. Localized and advanced penile cancers and their treatment have profound physical and psychosexual effects on the quality of life of patients and survivors by altering sexual and urinary function and causing lymphoedema.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Thomas
- Laboratory of Experimental Urology, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Genitourinary Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Asif Muneer
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.,Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marcos Tobias-Machado
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, ABC Medical School, Instituto do Cancer Vieira de Carvalho, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Anna Thi Huyen Tran
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Maarten Albersen
- Laboratory of Experimental Urology, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. .,Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ulvskog E, Drevin L, Persson EK, Lambe M, Kirrander P, Ahlgren J. Oncological therapy to Swedish men with metastatic penile cancer 2000-2015. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:42-49. [PMID: 33030399 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1829039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Penile cancer is an uncommon disease with poor prognosis when spread to more than one inguinal lymph node. Recommendations on chemo- and radiotherapy in treatment guidelines are based on low-grade evidence. There are to our knowledge no described population-based cohort with detailed information on given oncological treatment and survival data. The aim of this study is to investigate in detail how men with metastatic penile cancer have been treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy over time, and how survival varies with N-stage and given treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS For this observational cohort study all men in Sweden diagnosed with penile cancer with lymph node- or distant metastases 2000-2015 were identified through the Swedish National Penile Cancer Register (NPECR). Medical records were retrieved and 325 men were confirmed to have metastatic penile cancer (Tany, c or pN1-3 and/or M1). Information on treatments was collected. Causes of death were retrieved from the National Cause of Death Register (CDR). RESULTS Chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy were given to 172 (53%) of all men. The use of oncological treatments with curative intent increased significantly during the study period, from 30% of men with c/pN2-3 diagnosed 2000-2003 compared with 57% of men diagnosed 2012-2015. Ninety-three (29%) men received oncological treatments with curative intent of whom 85/93 (91%) had stage c/pN2-3M0. Survival decreased with higher N-stage, M1-stage, and absence of oncological treatment with curative intent. For men with c/pN3-stage, the engagement of pelvic lymph nodes was entailed with lower survival than pN3 based on extra-nodal extension (ENE). CONCLUSION The use of oncological treatment was below recommendations in guidelines but increased during the study period. Treatment was given predominantly to men with c/pN2-3 and M1-disease. Survival was higher among men treated with curative intent; this could be due to patient selection bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Ulvskog
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Department of Oncology, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Linda Drevin
- Regional Cancer Centre, Uppsala-Örebro, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Mats Lambe
- Regional Cancer Centre, Uppsala-Örebro, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter Kirrander
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Department of Urology, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Johan Ahlgren
- Regional Cancer Centre, Uppsala-Örebro, Uppsala, Sweden
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for lymph node-positive penile cancer: current evidence and knowledge. Curr Opin Urol 2020; 30:218-222. [PMID: 31913205 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To review the latest in penile cancer treatment focusing on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with regional lymph node involvement. RECENT FINDINGS Patients with regional lymph node involvement from penile cancer still suffer from a poor prognosis, and the chances to achieve cure are primarily dependent on the extent of the disease. Despite multiple lines of research are indicating the need for a multimodal management of the disease upfront, the search for newer effective systemic therapies is ongoing. The available guidelines currently suggest the use of combination chemotherapy regimens including taxanes and cisplatin as induction therapy before lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced disease (i.e., fixed or bulky inguinal lymph nodes or pelvic lymph node involvement). Research in the field will aim to provide more effective systemic therapies also in patients with a more limited disease spread to further improve the outcomes. Data from the literature also indicate the possibility to effectively administer postoperative chemotherapy in selected high-risk patients. SUMMARY We aimed to provide the evidence from the literature and the new avenues that would help delineating the optimal therapeutic pathway for these complex patients, commenting on the new opportunities that may come from the ongoing research.
Collapse
|
13
|
Bandini M, Spiess PE, Pederzoli F, Marandino L, Brouwer OR, Albersen M, Roussel E, de Vries HM, Chipollini J, Zhu Y, Ye DW, Ornellas AA, Catanzaro M, Hakenberg OW, Heidenreich A, Haidl F, Watkin N, Ager M, Ahmed ME, Karnes JR, Briganti A, Salvioni R, Montorsi F, Azizi M, Necchi A. A risk calculator predicting recurrence in lymph node metastatic penile cancer. BJU Int 2020; 126:577-585. [PMID: 32662205 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop and externally validate a risk calculator for prediction of any cancer recurrence in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) and inguinal lymph node metastases (ILNM), as to date no validated prognostic tool is available for patients with pSCC and ILNM. PATIENTS AND METHODS The development cohort included 234 patients from seven referral centres. The external validation cohort included 273 patients from two additional referral centres. Cox regression identified predictors of any recurrence, which were used to develop a risk calculator. The risk-calculator grouped the development and the validation cohorts according to the individual risk of any recurrence at 24 months (24m-R). Adjuvant treatment effects were tested on overall survival (OS) according to the derived tertiles, within the development and validation cohorts. RESULTS Positive surgical margins, pN3 , and ILNM ratio were associated with higher recurrence rate. The 2-year OS rates were lower for patients with high (>37%) and intermediate (19-37%) compared to low (<19%) 24m-R risk of recurrence, for both the development (43% and 58% vs 83%, P < 0.001) and validation cohort (44% and 50% vs 85%, P < 0.001). Results were confirmed in the subgroup of patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment (P < 0.001), but not in patients who did receive adjuvant treatments in both the development and validation cohorts (P > 0.1). CONCLUSION Adjuvant treatment planning is crucial in patients with pSCC with ILNM, where only weak evidence is available. The current tool proved to successfully stratify patients according to their individual risk, potentially allowing better tailoring of adjuvant treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Bandini
- Urological Research Institute (URI), Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Filippo Pederzoli
- Urological Research Institute (URI), Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Marandino
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Oscar R Brouwer
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Hielke M de Vries
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Juan Chipollini
- Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Yao Zhu
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Ding-Wei Ye
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Antonio A Ornellas
- Hospital Mário Kröeff and Brazilian Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Mario Catanzaro
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Nick Watkin
- St. George's University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Michael Ager
- St. George's University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Alberto Briganti
- Urological Research Institute (URI), Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Montorsi
- Urological Research Institute (URI), Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Mounsif Azizi
- Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Adjuvant radiation compares favorably to chemotherapy in patients with carcinoma penis and nodal positivity restricted to groin. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:641.e9-641.e18. [PMID: 32334927 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare overall survival (OS) between adjuvant radiation, chemotherapy and chemoradiation (CCRT) postsurgery for node-positive patients with carcinoma penis. METHODS Prospectively maintained registry for 45 patients receiving adjuvant treatment following lymph node dissection from 2011 to 2017, having minimum 6 months follow-up and more than 2 positive inguinal nodes was analyzed. Patients without pelvic nodal positivity (n= 32) were treated by radiotherapy (RT) (n = 25) or chemotherapy (n = 7); CCRT (n = 6) or chemotherapy (n = 7) was used in patients with positive pelvic nodes (n = 13). Data was collected for age, comorbidities, body mass index, tobacco exposure, treatment modality, tumor grade, pathological T and N stage, and extra-nodal extension. OS was compared between different treatment modalities stratifying patients with and without pelvic nodal positivity. Multivariate cox proportional hazard analysis was used to narrow down remaining variables and Inverse Probability Treatment Weights modeling was used to determine average treatment effect. RESULTS About 12 of 14 patients in the chemotherapy group received both cisplatin and paclitaxel. Pathological T stage, N stage and extra-nodal extension had significant association with OS on multivariate analysis. Among patients with nodal positivity restricted to groin the estimated average OS when all patients received adjuvant RT was 1,438 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 1,256-1,619 days, Pvalue <0.0001). The estimated average OS if all patients received chemotherapy was lower by 1,007 days (95% CI 810-1,202 days, P value <0.0001). Among patients with positive pelvic nodes the estimated average OS when all patients received adjuvant CCRT was 467 days (95% CI 368-566 days, P value <0.0001). The estimated average OS difference if all patients received chemotherapy was 17 days (95% CI -144 to 178 days, Pvalue 0.21). CONCLUSION In patients with nodal positivity limited to groin, adjuvant RT proved superior to chemotherapy. Among patients with pelvic nodal positivity, CCRT offers no significant OS advantage over combination chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
15
|
Mistretta F, Cyr SJ, Palumbo C, Mazzone E, Knipper S, Tian Z, Nazzani S, Montanari E, Tilki D, Briganti A, Shariat S, Perrotte P, Saad F, de Cobelli O, Karakiewicz P. Adherence to Guideline Recommendations for Perioperative Chemotherapy in Patients with pN2-3 M0 Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis: Temporal Trends and Survival Outcomes. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:e93-e101. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2018] [Revised: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
16
|
Xu W, Qi F, Liu Y, Zheng L, Kang Z. Nomograms to predict overall and cancer-specific survival in patients with penile cancer. Transl Cancer Res 2020; 9:2326-2339. [PMID: 35117593 PMCID: PMC8798233 DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2020.03.77] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2019] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To develop and validate prognostic nomograms for predicting overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with penile cancer (PC). METHODS Based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database, patients diagnosed with PC from 2010 to 2015 were enrolled in this study. For each patient, clinical characteristics and survival results were respectively collected. With the method of random-number generation, included patients were divided into the training cohort and the validation group. Subsequently, nomograms were constructed to predict 3- and 5-year OS and CSS based on the results of multivariate analyses. Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and the log-rank test were used to estimate survival curves of each variables. Finally, the calibration plots, concordance index (C-index), area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate nomograms performance. RESULTS Totally, 1,418 patients were eventually enrolled in the study, including 994 patients in the training cohort and 424 patients in the validation cohort. No significant difference was detected in the baseline characteristics between two cohorts. According to results of the uni- and multivariate analysis in the training cohort, 7 factors (including age, race, T stage, N stage, M stage, histology codes, and the use of surgery) for OS and 7 factors (including race, T stage, N stage, M stage, histology codes, the use of surgery and lymph node removal) for CSS were selected for constructing the nomograms. The C-indices for OS and CSS were 0.755 and 0.805 in the training cohort and 0.711, 0.737 in the validation cohort. In addition, the 3- and 5-year area under the ROC curve (AUC)s for OS were 0.792 and 0.771 in the training cohort, and 0.687 and 0.695 in the validation group. When it came to CSS, it was 0.83 and 0.826 in the training cohort and 0.758 and 0.746 in the validation cohort. Lastly, the calibration curves indicated a good consistency between the actual survival and the predictive survival. CONCLUSIONS We firstly established survival models to predict OS and CSS in PC patients with good predictive ability. Further studies are needed to validate our results before clinical application in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenbo Xu
- Department of Surgery, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
| | - Feng Qi
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
- Department of Urology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Yi Liu
- Department of Surgery, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
| | - Lizhuan Zheng
- Department of Surgery, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
| | - Zhengjun Kang
- Department of Surgery, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Joshi SS, Handorf E, Strauss D, Correa AF, Kutikov A, Chen DYT, Viterbo R, Greenberg RE, Uzzo RG, Smaldone MC, Geynisman DM. Treatment Trends and Outcomes for Patients With Lymph Node-Positive Cancer of the Penis. JAMA Oncol 2019; 4:643-649. [PMID: 29494739 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Penile cancer is an uncommon disease with minimal level I evidence to guide therapy. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines advocate a lymph node dissection (LND) or radiotherapy with consideration of perioperative chemotherapy for all patients with lymph node-positive (LN+) penile cancer without metastasis. Objectives To determine temporal trends in use of chemotherapy for patients with LN+ penile cancer without metastasis and to evaluate outcomes between those who did or did not receive LND, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants The US National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for all 1123 patients with LN+, squamous cell carcinoma of the penis without metastasis from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2014. Temporal trends were assessed using Cochran-Armitage tests. Multivariable logistic models were used to examine the association between treatments, clinicopathologic variables, and receipt of chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier analyses with log-rank tests and multivariable Cox regressions were used to analyze overall survival. Data were analyzed between January 2017 and September 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures Use of chemotherapy over time. Survival outcomes by receipt or nonreceipt of LND, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Results Of 1123 patients identified, most were white (924 [82.3%]) vs African American (141 [12.6%]) or of other or unknown race (58 [5.2%]). The age of most patients (727 [64.7%]) was between 50 and 75 years, and 750 patients (66.8%) underwent an LND. From 2004 to 2014, the use of systemic therapy significantly increased (26 of 68 patients, 38.2% vs 65 of 136, 47.8%; P < .001). However, only 177 of 335 patients with N3 disease (52.8%) received chemotherapy (N1: 106 of 338, 31.4%; N2: 178 of 450, 39.6%). Following adjustment, older patients (>76 years: OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.15-0.50; P < .001) were less likely to receive chemotherapy. Patients who received radiotherapy (OR, 4.38; 95% CI, 3.10-6.18; P < .001) and those patients with N2 (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.16-2.27; P = .005) or N3 (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.67-3.22; P < .001) cancer were more likely to receive chemotherapy. On multivariable analysis, LND (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.78; P < .001) was associated with better overall survival, while neither chemotherapy (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.80-1.26; P = .95) nor radiotherapy (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.70-1.04; P = .11) was associated with overall survival. Conclusions and Relevance In hospitals reporting to the NCDB, only 66.8% of patients with LN+ penile cancer received an LND. While chemotherapy use has increased since 2004, rates remain low (52.8% for patients with N3 cancer). Receipt of LND, but not chemotherapy or radiotherapy, is associated with overall survival. This may reflect the aggressive natural history of penile cancer as well as the inherent analysis limitation of a relatively small sample size. These data highlight opportunities to improve adherence to guideline-recommended care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shreyas S Joshi
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Elizabeth Handorf
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - David Strauss
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Andres F Correa
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Alexander Kutikov
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - David Y T Chen
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Rosalia Viterbo
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Richard E Greenberg
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert G Uzzo
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Marc C Smaldone
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Daniel M Geynisman
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Updates in the molecular epidemiology and systemic approaches to penile cancer. Urol Oncol 2019; 37:403-408. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Revised: 04/10/2019] [Accepted: 04/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
19
|
Necchi A, Lo Vullo S, Mariani L, Zhu Y, Ye DW, Ornellas AA, Watkin N, Ager M, Hakenberg OW, Heidenreich A, Raggi D, Catanzaro M, Salvioni R, Chipollini J, Azizi M, Spiess PE. Nomogram-based prediction of overall survival after regional lymph node dissection and the role of perioperative chemotherapy in penile squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter study. Urol Oncol 2019; 37:531.e7-531.e15. [PMID: 31053524 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2018] [Revised: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To improve the prognostic allocation of patients with penile squamous-cell carcinoma (PSCC) receiving regional lymph node dissection (LND). PATIENTS AND METHODS An international, multicenter, retrospective study was performed on patients with PSCC who received regional LND, with or without perioperative therapy, from 1980 to 2017. We first used a random forest (RF) method with missing data imputation. Additionally, data were modeled using Cox proportional hazard regression, and a Cox model was also fit including prespecified variables. Based on the latter model, a nomogram for estimating 12-month and 24-month overall survival (OS) was developed. RESULTS There were 743 patients who received LND at 7 referral centers from Europe, the USA, Brazil, and China. Of these patients, 689 were analyzed: 86 (12.5%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC); 171 (24.8%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), and 74 (10.7%) received adjuvant radiotherapy. The variables significantly associated with OS were age (P < 0.001), the pathologically involved/total removed LN ratio (P < 0.001), pN stage (overall P < 0.001), and NAC (P = 0.013). NAC and AC were ineffective in N1-2 patients (clinical and pathological, respectively), whereas they provided OS improvements in N3 patients. Finally, we developed a nomogram predicting 12- and 24-month OS based on prespecified variables (c-index: 0.75). The study is limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS We propose a tool that can be offered as an aid to physicians to enhance decision-making, clinical research, and patient counseling whenever LND is needed for PSCC. Administration of NAC and AC should be restricted to clinical and pathological N3 patients, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Necchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
| | | | - Luigi Mariani
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Yao Zhu
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Ding-Wei Ye
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Antonio A Ornellas
- Hospital Mário Kröeff and Brazilian Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Nick Watkin
- St. George's University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Ager
- St. George's University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Daniele Raggi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Mario Catanzaro
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | - Mounsif Azizi
- Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Necchi A, Raggi D, Giannatempo P. Role of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Penile Cancer. Urol Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42623-5_37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
21
|
Asghar AM, McIntosh AG, Kutikov A, Chen DY, Geynisman DM. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for penile cancer enabling organ preservation: A case of individualized management for bilateral lymph node metastasis and a bulky primary tumor. Urol Case Rep 2018; 23:3-5. [PMID: 30505684 PMCID: PMC6260424 DOI: 10.1016/j.eucr.2018.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2018] [Accepted: 11/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Aeen M Asghar
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111, United States
| | - Andrew G McIntosh
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111, United States
| | - Alexander Kutikov
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111, United States
| | - David Yt Chen
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111, United States
| | - Daniel M Geynisman
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Johnstone PAS, Boulware D, Djajadiningrat R, Ottenhof S, Necchi A, Catanzaro M, Ye D, Zhu Y, Nicolai N, Horenblas S, Spiess PE. Primary Penile Cancer: The Role of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in the Management of Extranodal Extension in Lymph Nodes. Eur Urol Focus 2018; 5:737-741. [PMID: 30327282 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2018] [Revised: 09/25/2018] [Accepted: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In head and neck cancer, the presence of extranodal extension (ENE) in lymph nodes (LNs) has been shown prospectively to require adding chemotherapy to postoperative radiation therapy (RT). Limited data exist regarding ENE in LNs from primary penile cancer (PeCa). OBJECTIVE To determine the association of RT and ENE in PeCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 93 patients with pT1-4 N3 M0 (American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition) squamous cell carcinoma of the penis across four international centers. INTERVENTION If the inguinal nodal specimen had ENE or two or more positive inguinal LNs, RT was delivered to an ipsilateral inguinal field. An ipsilateral pelvic field was added for positive pelvic LNs on dissection. The delivered dose was usually 50Gy in 25 daily fractions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Clinical and demographic characteristics of relapse-free (RFS), disease-specific (DSS), and overall (OS) survival were compared by ENE status and receipt of adjuvant RT. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Seventy-two percent of patients had inguinal ENE, and 49% had pelvic ENE. On multivariable analysis (MVA) of ENE-negative patients, an OS benefit was noted with postoperative chemotherapy (p=0.038) and inguinopelvic RT (p=0.037). RFS suffered with worsening grade of the lesion (moderately: p=0.027; poorly: p=0.038), but was improved with groin (p=0.016) and inguinopelvic (p=0.006) RT. On MVA of patients with ENE, inguinopelvic RT was associated with better DSS (p=0.041). Grade impacted DSS (moderately: p=0.043; poorly: p=0.033), and poorly differentiated lesions impacted RFS (p=0.013). CONCLUSIONS Inguinopelvic RT may benefit regional control in PeCa patients with positive pelvic LNs, but this appears to be limited to those without ENE. PATIENT SUMMARY For patients with penile cancer and positive pelvic lymph nodes, postoperative radiation therapy was found to decrease the likelihood of disease recurrence in the groin or pelvis only if extranodal extension was absent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Boulware
- Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL, USA
| | - Rosa Djajadiningrat
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah Ottenhof
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Mario Catanzaro
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Dingwei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Yao Zhu
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Simon Horenblas
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Azizi M, Chipollini J, Peyton CC, Cheriyan SK, Spiess PE. Current controversies and developments on the role of lymphadenectomy for penile cancer. Urol Oncol 2018; 37:201-208. [PMID: 30301700 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2018] [Revised: 08/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Penile squamous cell carcinoma is a rare cancer in men. The main prognosticators of survival for penile cancer patients remain the presence and the extent of lymph node metastasis. While radical inguinal lymphadenectomy has been the cornerstone of regional lymph node management for many years, it is still associated with significant morbidity and psychological distress. Recent developments in penile squamous cell carcinoma management have been met with some controversy in the urologic oncology community. Herein, we review the current controversies and developments on the role of inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mounsif Azizi
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
| | - Juan Chipollini
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Charles C Peyton
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Salim K Cheriyan
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Walther Hakenberg O, Louise Dräger D, Erbersdobler A, Maik Naumann C, Jünemann KP, Protzel C. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Penile Cancer. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2018; 115:646-652. [PMID: 30375327 PMCID: PMC6224543 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2017] [Revised: 12/03/2017] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of penile cancer in Europe lies in the range of 0.9 to 2.1 cases per 100 000 persons per year. Carcinogenesis is associated with human papilloma virus (HPV) infection and with chronic inflammation. METHODS This review is based on publications (2010-2017) retrieved by a selective search in PubMed and EMBASE and on the guidelines of the European Association of Urology, the European Society of Medical Oncology, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). RESULTS 95% of cases of penile cancer are accounted for by squamous cell carcinoma, whose numerous subtypes have different clinical courses. Chronic preputial inflammation due to phimosis or lichen sclerosus is often associated with penile cancer. Circumcision lowers the risk of penile cancer (hazard ratio: 0.33). Maximally organ-preserving surgery with safety margins of no more than a few millimeters is the current therapeutic standard, because a local recurrence, if it arises, can still be treated locally with curative intent. Local radiotherapy can be performed in early stages. Lymphogenic metastasis must be treated with radical lymphadenectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with clinically unremarkable inguinal lymph nodes nonetheless need invasive lymph node staging because of the high rate of lymphogenic micrometastasis. CONCLUSION Penile cancer is curable in all early stages with the appropriate treatment, but its prognosis depends crucially on the proper management of the regional (i.e., inguinal) lymph nodes. In many countries, the treatment of this rare disease entity has been centralized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Carsten Maik Naumann
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital (UK-SH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Klaus-Peter Jünemann
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital (UK-SH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Chris Protzel
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Rostock; Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
|
26
|
Robinson R, Marconi L, MacPepple E, Hakenberg OW, Watkin N, Yuan Y, Lam T, MacLennan S, Adewuyi TE, Coscione A, Minhas SS, Compérat EM, Necchi A. Risks and Benefits of Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in Node-positive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review by the European Association of Urology Penile Cancer Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol 2018; 74:76-83. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Accepted: 04/02/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
27
|
|
28
|
Yuan Z, Naghavi AO, Tang D, Kim Y, Ahmed KA, Dhillon J, Giuliano AR, Spiess PE, Johnstone PA. The relationship between HPV status and chemoradiotherapy in the locoregional control of penile cancer. World J Urol 2018; 36:1431-1440. [PMID: 29589134 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2280-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2018] [Accepted: 03/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Penile cancer (PeCa) is a rare, aggressive malignancy often associated with the human papillomavirus (HPV). The practice of a personalized risk-adapted approach is not yet established. This study is to assess the relationship between HPV tumor status and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in PeCa locoregional control (LRC). METHODS We retrospectively identified patients with HPV status who were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and treated with surgical resection between 1999 and 2016. The relationship between tumor/treatment characteristics and LRC were analyzed with univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis (UVA and MVA, respectively). Time-to-event outcomes were estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves and compared via log-rank tests. RESULTS Fifty-one patients were identified. The median follow-up was 36.6 months. Patients were primarily HPV-negative (HPV-) (n = 28, 55%), and pathologic node positive (pN+) (55%). The 2 year LRC rate was 54%. pN+ patients had a significantly lower 2 year LRC (37 vs. 81%, p = 0.002). In the subgroup analysis of pN+ patients (n = 28), there was a LRC benefit associated with the addition of CRT (HR 0.19; 95% CI 0.05-0.70, p = 0.012) and HPV-positive (HPV+) disease (HR 0.18; 95% CI 0.039-0.80, p = 0.024) using MVA. HPV+ patients treated with CRT had improved 2 year LRC compared to HPV- patients (83 vs. 38%, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant CRT and HPV+ disease independently predicted for improved LRC in pN+ PeCa. In HPV+ PeCa, the LRC benefit was primarily observed in patients treated with adjuvant CRT. Prospective investigation of HPV+ and CRT is required to further delineate their roles in optimizing PeCa treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhigang Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Arash O Naghavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Dominic Tang
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Youngchul Kim
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Kamran A Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Jasreman Dhillon
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Anna R Giuliano
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Peter A Johnstone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Necchi A, Raggi D, Giannatempo P. Role of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Penile Cancer. Urol Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42603-7_37-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
30
|
Necchi A, Lo Vullo S, Perrone F, Raggi D, Giannatempo P, Calareso G, Nicolai N, Piva L, Biasoni D, Catanzaro M, Torelli T, Stagni S, Togliardi E, Colecchia M, Busico A, Gloghini A, Testi A, Mariani L, Salvioni R. First-line therapy with dacomitinib, an orally available pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, for locally advanced or metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma: results of an open-label, single-arm, single-centre, phase 2 study. BJU Int 2017; 121:348-356. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.14013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Milano Italy
| | - Salvatore Lo Vullo
- Clinical Epidemiology and Trials Organization Unit; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Milano Italy
| | - Federica Perrone
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Milano Italy
| | - Daniele Raggi
- Department of Medical Oncology; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Milano Italy
| | - Patrizia Giannatempo
- Department of Medical Oncology; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Milano Italy
| | - Giuseppina Calareso
- Department of Radiology; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Milano Italy
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Urology Unit; Department of Surgery; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Milano Italy
| | - Luigi Piva
- Urology Unit; Department of Surgery; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Milano Italy
| | - Davide Biasoni
- Urology Unit; Department of Surgery; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Milano Italy
| | - Mario Catanzaro
- Urology Unit; Department of Surgery; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Milano Italy
| | - Tullio Torelli
- Urology Unit; Department of Surgery; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Milano Italy
| | - Silvia Stagni
- Urology Unit; Department of Surgery; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Milano Italy
| | - Elena Togliardi
- Pharmacy Unit; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Milano Italy
| | - Maurizio Colecchia
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Milano Italy
| | - Adele Busico
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Milano Italy
| | - Annunziata Gloghini
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Milano Italy
| | - Adele Testi
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Milano Italy
| | - Luigi Mariani
- Clinical Epidemiology and Trials Organization Unit; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Milano Italy
| | - Roberto Salvioni
- Urology Unit; Department of Surgery; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Milano Italy
| |
Collapse
|