1
|
Castro-Martins P, Marques A, Coelho L, Vaz M, Baptista JS. In-shoe plantar pressure measurement technologies for the diabetic foot: A systematic review. Heliyon 2024; 10:e29672. [PMID: 38699042 PMCID: PMC11064085 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Loss of cutaneous protective sensation and high plantar pressures increase the risk for diabetic foot patients. Trauma and ulceration are imminent threats, making assessment and monitoring essential. This systematic review aims to identify systems and technologies for measuring in-shoe plantar pressures, focusing on the at-risk diabetic foot population. Methods A systematic search was conducted across four electronic databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Oxford Journals) using PRISMA methodology, covering articles published in English from 1979 to 2024. Only studies addressing systems or sensors exclusively measuring plantar pressures inside the shoe were included. Results A total of 87 studies using commercially available devices and 45 articles proposing new systems or sensors were reviewed. The prevailing market offerings consist mainly of instrumented insoles. Emerging technologies under development often feature configurations with four, six or eight resistive sensors strategically placed within removable insoles. Despite some variability due to the inherent heterogeneity of human gait, these devices assess plantar pressure, although they present significant differences between them in measurement results. Individuals with diabetic foot conditions appears exhibit elevated plantar pressures, with reported peak pressures reaching approximately 1000 kPa. The results also showed significant differences between the diabetic and non-diabetic groups. Conclusion Instrumented insoles, particularly those incorporating resistive sensor technology, dominate the field. Systems employing eight sensors at critical locations represent a pragmatic approach, although market options extend to systems with up to 960 sensors. Differences between devices can be a critical factor in measurement and highlights the importance of individualized patient assessment using consistent measurement devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Castro-Martins
- CIETI, ISEP, Polytechnic of Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Portugal
| | - Arcelina Marques
- CIETI, ISEP, Polytechnic of Porto, Portugal
- Institute for Science and Innovation in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Porto, Portugal
| | - Luís Coelho
- CIETI, ISEP, Polytechnic of Porto, Portugal
- INESC-TEC, Centre for Robotics in Industry and Intelligent Systems, Porto, Portugal
| | - Mário Vaz
- Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Portugal
- Institute for Science and Innovation in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Porto, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Barsotti E, Goodman B, Samuelson R, Carvour ML. A Scoping Review of Wearable Technologies for Use in Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities and Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2024:19322968241231279. [PMID: 38439547 DOI: 10.1177/19322968241231279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals with intellectual disabilities (IDs) are at risk of diabetes mellitus (DM) and diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), which can lead to foot ulcers and lower-extremity amputations. However, cognitive differences and communication barriers may impede some methods for screening and prevention of DPN. Wearable and mobile technologies-such as smartphone apps and pressure-sensitive insoles-could help to offset these barriers, yet little is known about the effectiveness of these technologies among individuals with ID. METHODS We conducted a scoping review of the databases Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science using search terms for DM, DPN, ID, and technology to diagnose or monitor DPN. Finding a lack of research in this area, we broadened our search terms to include any literature on technology to diagnose or monitor DPN and then applied these findings within the context of ID. RESULTS We identified 88 articles; 43 of 88 (48.9%) articles were concerned with gait mechanics or foot pressures. No articles explicitly included individuals with ID as the target population, although three articles involved individuals with other cognitive impairments (two among patients with a history of stroke, one among patients with hemodialysis-related cognitive changes). CONCLUSIONS Individuals with ID are not represented in studies using technology to diagnose or monitor DPN. This is a concern given the risk of DM complications among patients with ID and the potential for added benefit of such technologies to reduce barriers to screening and prevention. More studies should investigate how wearable devices can be used among patients with ID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ercole Barsotti
- College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Bailey Goodman
- College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Riley Samuelson
- Hardin Library for the Health Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Martha L Carvour
- College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Minty E, Bray E, Bachus CB, Everett B, Smith KM, Matijevich E, Hajizadeh M, Armstrong DG, Liden B. Preventative Sensor-Based Remote Monitoring of the Diabetic Foot in Clinical Practice. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 23:6712. [PMID: 37571496 PMCID: PMC10422561 DOI: 10.3390/s23156712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023]
Abstract
Diabetes and its complications, particularly diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), pose significant challenges to healthcare systems worldwide. DFUs result in severe consequences such as amputation, increased mortality rates, reduced mobility, and substantial healthcare costs. The majority of DFUs are preventable and treatable through early detection. Sensor-based remote patient monitoring (RPM) has been proposed as a possible solution to overcome limitations, and enhance the effectiveness, of existing foot care best practices. However, there are limited frameworks available on how to approach and act on data collected through sensor-based RPM in DFU prevention. This perspective article offers insights from deploying sensor-based RPM through digital DFU prevention regimens. We summarize the data domains and technical architecture that characterize existing commercially available solutions. We then highlight key elements for effective RPM integration based on these new data domains, including appropriate patient selection and the need for detailed clinical assessments to contextualize sensor data. Guidance on establishing escalation pathways for remotely monitored at-risk patients and the importance of predictive system management is provided. DFU prevention RPM should be integrated into a comprehensive disease management strategy to mitigate foot health concerns, reduce activity-associated risks, and thereby seek to be synergistic with other components of diabetes disease management. This integrated approach has the potential to enhance disease management in diabetes, positively impacting foot health and the healthspan of patients living with diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan Minty
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Emily Bray
- Orpyx Medical Technologies, Inc., Calgary, AB T2G 1M8, Canada (E.M.); (M.H.)
| | - Courtney B. Bachus
- Orpyx Medical Technologies, Inc., Calgary, AB T2G 1M8, Canada (E.M.); (M.H.)
| | - Breanne Everett
- Orpyx Medical Technologies, Inc., Calgary, AB T2G 1M8, Canada (E.M.); (M.H.)
| | - Karen M. Smith
- Orpyx Medical Technologies, Inc., Calgary, AB T2G 1M8, Canada (E.M.); (M.H.)
| | - Emily Matijevich
- Orpyx Medical Technologies, Inc., Calgary, AB T2G 1M8, Canada (E.M.); (M.H.)
| | - Maryam Hajizadeh
- Orpyx Medical Technologies, Inc., Calgary, AB T2G 1M8, Canada (E.M.); (M.H.)
| | - David G. Armstrong
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
- USC Limb Preservation Program, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
- Southwestern Academic Limb Salvage Alliance (SALSA), Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
- USC Center to Stream Healthcare in Place (C2SHIP), Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Brock Liden
- Cutting Edge Research, Circleville, OH 43113, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang X, Yuan CX, Xu B, Yu Z. Diabetic foot ulcers: Classification, risk factors and management. World J Diabetes 2022; 13:1049-1065. [PMID: 36578871 PMCID: PMC9791567 DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v13.i12.1049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulceration is a devastating complication of diabetes that is associated with infection, amputation, and death, and is affecting increasing numbers of patients with diabetes mellitus. The pathogenesis of foot ulcers is complex, and different factors play major roles in different stages. The refractory nature of foot ulcer is reflected in that even after healing there is still a high recurrence rate and amputation rate, which means that management and nursing plans need to be considered carefully. The importance of establishment of measures for prevention and management of DFU has been emphasized. Therefore, a validated and appropriate DFU classification matching the progression is necessary for clinical diagnosis and management. In the first part of this review, we list several commonly used classification systems and describe their application conditions, scope, strengths, and limitations; in the second part, we briefly introduce the common risk factors for DFU, such as neuropathy, peripheral artery disease, foot deformities, diabetes complications, and obesity. Focusing on the relationship between the risk factors and DFU progression may facilitate prevention and timely management; in the last part, we emphasize the importance of preventive education, characterize several of the most frequently used management approaches, including glycemic control, exercise, offloading, and infection control, and call for taking into account and weighing the quality of life during the formulation of treatment plans. Multidisciplinary intervention and management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) based on the effective and systematic combination of these three components will contribute to the prevention and treatment of DFUs, and improve their prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuan Wang
- Key Laboratory of Acupuncture and Medicine Research of Ministry of Education, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Chong-Xi Yuan
- Key Laboratory of Acupuncture and Medicine Research of Ministry of Education, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Bin Xu
- Key Laboratory of Acupuncture and Medicine Research of Ministry of Education, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Zhi Yu
- Key Laboratory of Acupuncture and Medicine Research of Ministry of Education, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tekale S, Varma A, Tekale S, Kumbhare U. A Review on Newer Interventions for the Prevention of Diabetic Foot Disease. Cureus 2022; 14:e30591. [DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
6
|
Zorkaltsev MA, Zavadovskaya VD, Saprina TV, Zamyshevskaya MA, Udodov VD, Shestakov AV, Mikhailova AA, Loyko YN, Musina NN. Pathogen-specific molecular imaging and molecular testing methods in the prognosis of the complicated course of diabetic foot syndrome, the risk of amputation, and patient survival. BULLETIN OF SIBERIAN MEDICINE 2022. [DOI: 10.20538/1682-0363-2022-3-166-180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this review was to provide extended information on current trends in the diagnosis of complicated diabetic foot syndrome (DFS), the most frequent and severe complication of diabetes mellitus, including hightech medical imaging methods and instrumental and laboratory predictors of the complicated course and risk of amputation in DFS.The article provides an analytical review of modern publications over the past 5 years on diagnosis and therapy. Pilot data on the use of high-tech medical imaging methods, assessment of skin microbiota and ulcers in DFS, molecular testing methods in terms of predicting the amputation risk and survival of patients with DFS, as well as the effectiveness of biosensing systems have been systematized, summarized, and subjected to analytical evaluation.The review provides an expert assessment of the capabilities of pathogen-specific molecular imaging using modern positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and highenergy radionuclides in bacterial infection to understand its pathogenesis, minimize diagnostic problems, improve antimicrobial treatment, and address fundamental and applied aspects of DFS. Literature data on the assessment of foot perfusion in diabetic patients with varying degrees of limb ischemia by hybrid technologies (SPECT / CT and PET / CT) and new modalities of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are also systematized, which contributes to new understanding of the response to revascularization, surgical shunting, and stimulation of angiogenesis within ischemic tissue, as well as potentially to healing of foot ulcers.The review is aimed at substantiating a multidisciplinary approach in DFS, selection, development, and implementation of innovative strategies for diagnostic modalities to identify diabetic foot pathologies, and choice of an adequate method for treating and monitoring the results of therapy in the context of personalized medicine.
Collapse
|
7
|
Prospective Cohort Validation Study of a Novel Foot Offloading Device. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9:e3950. [PMID: 34840921 PMCID: PMC8613341 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Pressure offloading is often considered a crucial factor affecting healing after a foot injury. We have devised a novel foot offloading device (PopSole) which allows for immediate customization of the area where there is foot pain and allows for adjustable arch support and metatarsal pad height while maintaining patient stability. We hypothesize that pain and function outcomes will improve significantly after use of the device over a 1-month period. Ten participants with foot pain for longer than 6 months completed five validated outcome questionnaires during three visits (initial screening, at 2 weeks, and at 4 weeks). Devices were deflated in areas of pain specific for each patient. Validated patient reported outcomes measures showed significant improvement in pain and function from baseline to week two (r = 0.644, P < 0.05), (r = 0.43, P < 0.05), and (r = 0.552, P < 0.05), respectively, and the Foot & Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) showed improved ability in activities of daily living (r = 0.58, P < 0.05) and sports (r = 0.69, P < 0.05). All 10 patients reported pain relief during at least one visit and/or an ability to return to standing-based activities that they previously were unable to do. PopSole rapidly improved pain and function, with sustained relief through 4 weeks. Current studies are in progress to assess long-term durability of the device and potential modifications to be made before future randomized studies to assess pressure and gait assessment, shear forces, and diabetic foot ulcer mitigation.
Collapse
|
8
|
Lazzarini PA, Jarl G. Knee-High Devices Are Gold in Closing the Foot Ulcer Gap: A Review of Offloading Treatments to Heal Diabetic Foot Ulcers. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2021; 57:941. [PMID: 34577864 PMCID: PMC8471745 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57090941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are a leading cause of the global disease burden. Most DFUs are caused, and prolonged, by high plantar tissue stress under the insensate foot of a person with peripheral neuropathy. Multiple different offloading treatments have been used to try to reduce high plantar tissue stress and heal DFUs, including bedrest, casting, offloading devices, footwear, and surgical procedures. The best offloading treatments are those that balance the benefits of maximizing reductions in high plantar tissue stress, whilst reducing the risks of poor satisfaction, high costs and potential adverse events outcomes. This review aimed to summarize the best available evidence on the effects of offloading treatments to heal people with DFUs, plus review their use in clinical practice, the common barriers and solutions to using these treatments, and discuss promising emerging solutions that may improve offloading treatments in future. Findings demonstrate that knee-high offloading devices, non-removable or removable knee-high devices worn for all weight-bearing activities, are the gold standard offloading treatments to heal most patients with DFU, as they are much more effective, and typically safer, quicker, and cheaper to use compared with other offloading treatments. The effectiveness of offloading treatments also seems to increase when increased offloading mechanical features are incorporated within treatments, including customized insoles, rocker-bottom soles, controlled ankle motion, and higher cast walls. However, in clinical practice these gold standard knee-high offloading devices have low rates of prescription by clinicians and low rates of acceptance or adherence by patients. The common barriers resulting in this low use seem to surround historical misperceptions that are mostly dispelled by contemporary evidence. Further, research is now urgently required to close the implementation gap between the high-quality of supporting evidence and the low use of knee-high devices in clinical practice to reduce the high global disease burden of DFU in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A. Lazzarini
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4059, Australia
- Allied Health Research Collaborative, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane 4032, Australia
| | - Gustav Jarl
- Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, SE-70182 Örebro, Sweden;
- University Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, SE-70182 Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
D’Amico M, Kinel E, D’Amico G, Roncoletta P. A Self-Contained 3D Biomechanical Analysis Lab for Complete Automatic Spine and Full Skeleton Assessment of Posture, Gait and Run. SENSORS 2021; 21:s21113930. [PMID: 34200358 PMCID: PMC8201118 DOI: 10.3390/s21113930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Quantitative functional assessment of Posture and Motion Analysis of the entire skeleton and spine is highly desirable. Nonetheless, in most studies focused on posture and movement biomechanics, the spine is only grossly depicted because of its required level of complexity. Approaches integrating pressure measurement devices with stereophotogrammetric systems have been presented in the literature, but spine biomechanics studies have rarely been linked to baropodometry. A new multi-sensor system called GOALS-E.G.G. (Global Opto-electronic Approach for Locomotion and Spine-Expert Gait Guru), integrating a fully genlock-synched baropodometric treadmill with a stereophotogrammetric device, is introduced to overcome the above-described limitations. The GOALS-EGG extends the features of a complete 3D parametric biomechanical skeleton model, developed in an original way for static 3D posture analysis, to kinematic and kinetic analysis of movement, gait and run. By integrating baropodometric data, the model allows the estimation of lower limb net-joint forces, torques and muscle power. Net forces and torques are also assessed at intervertebral levels. All the elaborations are completely automatised up to the mean behaviour extraction for both posture and cyclic-repetitive tasks, allowing the clinician/researcher to perform, per each patient, multiple postural/movement tests and compare them in a unified statistically reliable framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moreno D’Amico
- SMART Lab (Skeleton Movement Analysis and Advanced Rehabilitation Technologies)—Bioengineering & Biomedicine Company, 65126 Pescara, Italy; (G.D.); (P.R.)
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences University G. D’Annunzio, 66100 Chieti, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Edyta Kinel
- Department of Rehabilitation, University of Medical Sciences, 61-545 Poznan, Poland;
| | - Gabriele D’Amico
- SMART Lab (Skeleton Movement Analysis and Advanced Rehabilitation Technologies)—Bioengineering & Biomedicine Company, 65126 Pescara, Italy; (G.D.); (P.R.)
| | - Piero Roncoletta
- SMART Lab (Skeleton Movement Analysis and Advanced Rehabilitation Technologies)—Bioengineering & Biomedicine Company, 65126 Pescara, Italy; (G.D.); (P.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fuchs MCHW, Hermans MMN, Kars HJJ, Hendriks JGE, van der Steen MC. Plantar pressure distribution and wearing characteristics of three forefoot offloading shoes in healthy adult subjects. Foot (Edinb) 2020; 45:101744. [PMID: 33010590 DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2020.101744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Revised: 08/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Forefoot offloading shoes are used to reduce pressure on specific regions of the foot. Aim of the pressure reduction is to aid healing of the soft and bony tissues and prevent complications by treating foot disorders. A great variety of forefoot offloading shoes are available. In a first step to investigate the appropriate use of these footwear in orthopedic settings, we studied plantar pressure distribution and wearing characteristics of three forefoot offloading shoes namely the Mailand, OrthoWedge and Podalux in a healthy population. Twenty subjects walked in a randomized order wearing three forefoot offloading shoes and a reference shoe for six minutes. The Pedar system was used to measure the pressure in 7 regions. Peak pressure and pressure time integral were analyzed as measures of pressure distribution. Furthermore, wearing characteristics were addressed using a Numeric Rating Scale. Pressure distribution and wearing characteristics of the forefoot offloading shoes were compared to a reference shoe. The Mailand and OrthoWedge shoes significantly reduced peak pressure with more than 80% under the hallux and more than 45% under MTH1 (p<.001). The Podalux did not show significant peak pressure reduction under the forefoot compared to the reference shoe. Under the lesser toes, the MTH4-5 region and heel region the Podalux shoe showed even a significant increase in peak pressure (p=.001). Looking at wearing characteristics, the Podalux and reference shoe scored significantly better than the other two forefoot offloading shoes (p<.01). In this study the differences between different forefoot offloading shoes was assessed. The Mailand and OrthoWedge shoes gave the best pressure reduction in the forefoot but are less comfortable in use. The Podalux rocker shoe showed opposite results. Next step is a patient study to compare our results in a patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M C H W Fuchs
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Postbus 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Orthopaedic Center Máxima, Máxima Medical Center, Postbus 90052, 5600 PD Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - M M N Hermans
- Orthopaedic Center Máxima, Máxima Medical Center, Postbus 90052, 5600 PD Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - H J J Kars
- Fontys Hogeschool Eindhoven, Allied Health Professions, Dominee Theodor Fliednerstraat 2, 5631 BN Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - J G E Hendriks
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Postbus 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Orthopaedic Center Máxima, Máxima Medical Center, Postbus 90052, 5600 PD Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - M C van der Steen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Postbus 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Orthopaedic Center Máxima, Máxima Medical Center, Postbus 90052, 5600 PD Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Golledge J, Fernando M, Lazzarini P, Najafi B, G. Armstrong D. The Potential Role of Sensors, Wearables and Telehealth in the Remote Management of Diabetes-Related Foot Disease. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2020; 20:E4527. [PMID: 32823514 PMCID: PMC7491197 DOI: 10.3390/s20164527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2020] [Revised: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Diabetes-related foot disease (DFD), which includes foot ulcers, infection and gangrene, is a leading cause of the global disability burden. About half of people who develop DFD experience a recurrence within one year. Long-term medical management to reduce the risk of recurrence is therefore important to reduce the global DFD burden. This review describes research assessing the value of sensors, wearables and telehealth in preventing DFD. Sensors and wearables have been developed to monitor foot temperature, plantar pressures, glucose, blood pressure and lipids. The monitoring of these risk factors along with telehealth consultations has promise as a method for remotely managing people who are at risk of DFD. This approach can potentially avoid or reduce the need for face-to-face consultations. Home foot temperature monitoring, continuous glucose monitoring and telehealth consultations are the approaches for which the most highly developed and user-friendly technology has been developed. A number of clinical studies in people at risk of DFD have demonstrated benefits when using one of these remote monitoring methods. Further development and evidence are needed for some of the other approaches, such as home plantar pressure and footwear adherence monitoring. As yet, no composite remote management program incorporating remote monitoring and the management of all the key risk factors for DFD has been developed and implemented. Further research assessing the feasibility and value of combining these remote monitoring approaches as a holistic way of preventing DFD is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Golledge
- Ulcer and wound Healing consortium (UHEAL), Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia;
- The Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Townsville University Hospital, Townsville, Queensland 4814, Australia
| | - Malindu Fernando
- Ulcer and wound Healing consortium (UHEAL), Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia;
| | - Peter Lazzarini
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia;
- Allied Health Research Collaborative, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland 4006, Australia
| | - Bijan Najafi
- Interdisciplinary Consortium on Advanced Motion Performance (iCAMP), Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - David G. Armstrong
- Southwestern Academic Limb Salvage Alliance (SALSA), Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lazzarini PA, Jarl G, Gooday C, Viswanathan V, Caravaggi CF, Armstrong DG, Bus SA. Effectiveness of offloading interventions to heal foot ulcers in persons with diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2020; 36 Suppl 1:e3275. [PMID: 32176438 PMCID: PMC8370012 DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2019] [Revised: 09/01/2019] [Accepted: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Offloading interventions are commonly used in clinical practice to heal foot ulcers. The aim of this updated systematic review is to investigate the effectiveness of offloading interventions to heal diabetic foot ulcers. METHODS We updated our previous systematic review search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to also include original studies published between July 29, 2014 and August 13, 2018 relating to four offloading intervention categories in populations with diabetic foot ulcers: (a) offloading devices, (b) footwear, (c) other offloading techniques, and (d) surgical offloading techniques. Outcomes included ulcer healing, plantar pressure, ambulatory activity, adherence, adverse events, patient-reported measures, and cost-effectiveness. Included controlled studies were assessed for methodological quality and had key data extracted into evidence and risk of bias tables. Included non-controlled studies were summarised on a narrative basis. RESULTS We identified 41 studies from our updated search for a total of 165 included studies. Six included studies were meta-analyses, 26 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 13 other controlled studies, and 120 non-controlled studies. Five meta-analyses and 12 RCTs provided high-quality evidence for non-removable knee-high offloading devices being more effective than removable offloading devices and therapeutic footwear for healing plantar forefoot and midfoot ulcers. Total contact casts (TCCs) and non-removable knee-high walkers were shown to be equally effective. Moderate-quality evidence exists for removable knee-high and ankle-high offloading devices being equally effective in healing, but knee-high devices have a larger effect on reducing plantar pressure and ambulatory activity. Low-quality evidence exists for the use of felted foam and surgical offloading to promote healing of plantar forefoot and midfoot ulcers. Very limited evidence exists for the efficacy of any offloading intervention for healing plantar heel ulcers, non-plantar ulcers, and neuropathic ulcers with infection or ischemia. CONCLUSION Strong evidence supports the use of non-removable knee-high offloading devices (either TCC or non-removable walker) as the first-choice offloading intervention for healing plantar neuropathic forefoot and midfoot ulcers. Removable offloading devices, either knee-high or ankle-high, are preferred as second choice over other offloading interventions. The evidence bases to support any other offloading intervention is still weak and more high-quality controlled studies are needed in these areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A. Lazzarini
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland
University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Allied Health Research Collaborative, The Prince Charles
Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Gustav Jarl
- Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of
Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
- University Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine
and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Catherine Gooday
- Elsie Bertram Diabetes Centre, Norfolk and Norwich
University Hospitals, Norwich, UK
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia,
Norwich, UK
| | | | - Carlo F. Caravaggi
- Diabetic Foot Department, IRCCS Multimedica Group, Milan,
Italy
- University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - David G. Armstrong
- Southwestern Academic Limb Salvage Alliance (SALSA),
Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California
(USC), Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Sicco A. Bus
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Rehabilitation
Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bus SA, Armstrong DG, Gooday C, Jarl G, Caravaggi C, Viswanathan V, Lazzarini PA. Guidelines on offloading foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2020; 36 Suppl 1:e3274. [PMID: 32176441 DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Revised: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) has published evidence-based guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease since 1999. This guideline is on the use of offloading interventions to promote the healing of foot ulcers in people with diabetes and updates the previous IWGDF guideline. We followed the GRADE methodology to devise clinical questions and critically important outcomes in the PICO format, to conduct a systematic review of the medical-scientific literature, and to write recommendations and their rationale. The recommendations are based on the quality of evidence found in the systematic review, expert opinion where evidence was not available, and a weighing of the benefits and harms, patient preferences, feasibility and applicability, and costs related to the intervention. For healing a neuropathic plantar forefoot or midfoot ulcer in a person with diabetes, we recommend that a nonremovable knee-high offloading device is the first choice of offloading treatment. A removable knee-high and removable ankle-high offloading device are to be considered as the second- and third-choice offloading treatment, respectively, if contraindications or patient intolerance to nonremovable offloading exist. Appropriately, fitting footwear combined with felted foam can be considered as the fourth-choice offloading treatment. If non-surgical offloading fails, we recommend to consider surgical offloading interventions for healing metatarsal head and digital ulcers. We have added new recommendations for the use of offloading treatment for healing ulcers that are complicated with infection or ischaemia and for healing plantar heel ulcers. Offloading is arguably the most important of multiple interventions needed to heal a neuropathic plantar foot ulcer in a person with diabetes. Following these recommendations will help health care professionals and teams provide better care for diabetic patients who have a foot ulcer and are at risk for infection, hospitalization, and amputation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sicco A Bus
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David G Armstrong
- Southwestern Academic Limb Salvage Alliance (SALSA), Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, California
| | - Catherine Gooday
- Elsie Bertram Diabetes Centre, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals, Norwich, UK
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Gustav Jarl
- Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
- University Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Carlo Caravaggi
- Diabetic Foot Department, IRCCS Multimedica Group, Milan, Italy
- University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Peter A Lazzarini
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Allied Health Research Collaborative, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ghomian B, Naemi R, Mehdizadeh S, Jafari H, Ebrahimi Takamjani I, Aghili R, Machado JM, Silva LFSF, Saeedi H. Gait stability of diabetic patients is altered with the rigid rocker shoes. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2019; 69:197-204. [PMID: 31376810 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Revised: 06/16/2019] [Accepted: 06/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rigid-rocker shoes may induce gait instability in diabetics, however, this is not clearly investigated. The present study investigates if rigid-rocker shoes influence diabetic gait stability. METHODS Fourteen non-neuropathic and nine neuropathic diabetics, plus eleven healthy young-adults were recruited. Full-body kinematic data was captured during walking. Experimental conditions included barefoot and three rocker-shoe designs according to the rocker angle, apex angle and apex position (R10: 10°, 80°, 60%; R15: 15°, 95°, 52%; R20: 20°, 95°, 60%). Sagittal and frontal stability margin, plus fear of fall were main outcome measures. FINDINGS Sagittal stability margin was not affected by health, however, was increased with R10 and R15 in non-neuropathic diabetics and healthy individuals (R2 = 0.16). Variability of sagittal stability margin was not altered in neuropathic diabetics, but was increased with R15 and R20 in healthy participants, with R15 in non-neuropathic diabetics (R2 = 0.12). Frontal stability margin (R2 = 0.46) and its variability (R2 = 0.39) were significantly increased in neuropathic and non-neuropathic diabetics compared to healthy individuals. Frontal stability margin was significantly higher with R15 in neuropathic diabetics, and with R20 in both non-neuropathic and healthy participants. Sagittal and frontal stability margin were strongly correlated with fear of fall in neuropathic diabetics. INTERPRETATIONS R15 and R20 might challenge gait stability of diabetics cause them restrict centre of mass motion thereby imposing a tighter control over walking. However, neuropathic diabetics generally walk very cautious due to neuropathy and increased fear of fall. Frontal stability margin, highly affected by health and experimental condition, is a more sensitive indicator of gait stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Banafshe Ghomian
- Rehabilitation Research Centre, Department of Orthotics and Prosthetics, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Roozbeh Naemi
- School of Life Sciences and Education, Staffordshire University, Stoke on Trent, United Kingdom.
| | - Sina Mehdizadeh
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Hassan Jafari
- Rehabilitation Research Centre, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychology Psychiatry and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom.
| | - Ismael Ebrahimi Takamjani
- Rehabilitation Research Centre, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Rokhsareh Aghili
- Endocrine Research Center, Institute of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - José Mendes Machado
- Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Minho, Guimarães, Portugal.
| | | | - Hassan Saeedi
- Rehabilitation Research Centre, Department of Orthotics and Prosthetics, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Poretti K, Peters J, Singh A. Effects of diabetic therapeutic footwear and traditional athletic footwear on gait:a cross-sectional investigation. FOOTWEAR SCIENCE 2019. [DOI: 10.1080/19424280.2019.1606092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Poretti
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Widener University, Chester, USA
| | - James Peters
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Widener University, Chester, USA
| | - Anita Singh
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Widener University, Chester, USA
| |
Collapse
|