Utilization and gender disparities of Deep Brain Stimulation surgery amongst Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Other Pacific Islanders with Parkinson's disease in Hawai`i

Filipinos and Parkinson's disease: A scoping review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Filipinos are the third largest sub-group of Asian Americans in the United States and have greater socioeconomic and health disparities than many other Asian sub-groups [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Characteristics of Filipino patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) have not been adequately studied.

OBJECTIVE

To scope the extent, range and nature of current knowledge on PD in Filipino-American (FA) patients in contrast to Filipino patients in general.

METHODS

We undertook a scoping review including all types of research relating to PD in Filipinos. We searched the following electronic databases: MEDLINE via PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Herdin and Journals@OVID (searched 1944-November 2024). Criteria for inclusion were peer-reviewed empirical articles published in English that specifically included and described Filipino patients with PD. We reviewed all eligible articles and categorized them by general topical themes.

RESULTS

The scoping review resulted in 48 eligible papers (Fig. 1). There were 7 papers that discussed PD in FA, and 35 papers that discussed PD in the Philippines. The main themes identified from the scoping review were: epidemiology/etiology (n = 19, 39 %), clinical manifestations and management (n = 20, 42 %), and access to PD care (n = 9, 19 %).

CONCLUSION

There is a paucity of information on PD in the FA population, with the majority of studies from the Philippines. Further studies on FA in the US, when compared to the studies from the Philippines, may shed light on how differences in the environment and sociodemographic factors may influence the nature and course of PD.

Gender disparity in access to advanced therapies for patients with Parkinson's disease: a retrospective real-word study

Background

Gender differences in the access to advanced therapies for Parkinson's disease (PD) are poorly investigated.

Objective

The objective of this study was to investigate the presence of any gender disparity in the access to advanced therapies for PD.

Design

Retrospective study.

Methods

Data from patients with consistent access to the Parkinson's and Movement Disorder Center of L'Aquila over the last 10-year period were screened. Patients selected for advanced therapies were included.

Results

Out of 1,252 patients, 200 (mean age ± SD 71.02 ± 9.70; 72% males; median Hoen Yahr level: 3, minimum 1 maximum 5) were selected for advanced therapies: 133 for Magnetic Resonance guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy (mean age ± SD 70.0 ± 8.9; 77% males), 49 for Levodopa/Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG) infusion (mean age ± SD 74.3 ± 11.4; 59% males), 12 for Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) (mean age ± SD 71.2 ± 6.3; 75% males), and 7 for Continuous Subcutaneous Apomorphine Infusion (CSAI) (mean age ± SD 69.7 ± 5.5; 43% males). No sex differences were found in relation to age (MRgFUS group: males vs. females 70.2 ± 8.9 vs. 70.8 ± 8.9, p-value = 0.809; LCIG group: males vs. females 73.5 ± 13.0 vs. 75.5 ± 8.5, p-value = 0.557; DBS group: males vs. females 77.2 ± 8.1 vs. 67.3 ± 8.6, p-value = 0.843; CSAI group: males vs. females 73.3 ± 4.0 vs. 67.0 ± 5.2, p-value = 0.144) and disease duration (MRgFUS group: males vs. females 8.3 ± 4.4 vs. 9.6 ± 6.7, p-value = 0.419; LCIG group: males vs. females 14.5 ± 5.81 vs. 17.3 ± 5.5; p-value = 0.205; DBS group: males vs. females 15.0 ± 9.6 vs. 15.5 ± 7.7, p-value = 0.796; CSAI group: males vs. females 11.7 ± 3.7 vs. 10.3 ± 3.7, p-value = 0.505).

Conclusion

The predominance of males is higher than that expected based on the higher prevalence of PD in men. Women are less confident in selecting advanced therapies during the natural progression of their disease. Factors accounting for this discrepancy deserve further investigation.

Disparities in Access to Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease and Proposed Interventions: A Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD), but disparities exist in access to DBS along gender, racial, and socioeconomic lines.

SUMMARY

Women are underrepresented in clinical trials and less likely to undergo DBS compared to their male counterparts. Racial and ethnic minorities are also less likely to undergo DBS procedures, even when controlling for disease severity and other demographic factors. These disparities can have significant impacts on patients' access to care, quality of life, and ability to manage their debilitating movement disorders.

KEY MESSAGES

Addressing these disparities requires increasing patient awareness and education, minimizing barriers to equitable access, and implementing diversity and inclusion initiatives within the healthcare system. In this systematic review, we first review literature discussing gender, racial, and socioeconomic disparities in DBS access and then propose several patient, provider, community, and national-level interventions to improve DBS access for all populations.

Racial disparities in hospitalization characteristics among Native Hawaiians, Pacific Islanders and Asian American subgroups with Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Differences among Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders (NHPI) and Asian American (AA) subgroups have not been adequately studied in Parkinson's disease (PD).

OBJECTIVE

To determine differences in demographics, comorbidities, and healthcare utilization among NHPI, AA subgroups, and White hospitalized PD patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of Hawai'is statewide registry (2016-2020). Patients with PD were identified using ICD10 code G20 and categorized as White, Japanese, Filipino, Chinese, NHPI, or Other. Variables collected included: age, sex, residence (county), primary source of payment, discharge status, length of stay, in-hospital expiration, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) utilization. Bivariate analyses were performed: differences in age and CCI were further examined by multivariable linear regression and proportional odds models.

RESULTS

Of 229,238 hospitalizations, 2428 had PD (Japanese: 31.3 %, White: 30.4 %, Filipino: 11.3 %, NHPI: 9.6 %, Chinese: 8.0 %). NHPI were younger compared to rest of the subgroups [estimate in years (95 % CI): Whites: 4.4 (3.0-5.8), Filipinos: 4.3 (2.7-5.9), Japanese: 7.7 (6.4-9.1), Chinese: 7.9 (6.1-9.7), p < 0.001)]. NHPI had a higher CCI compared to White, Japanese, and Chinese (p < 0.001). Among AA subgroups, Filipinos were younger and had a higher CCI compared to Japanese and Chinese (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in DBS utilization among subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

NHPI and Filipinos with PD were hospitalized at a younger age and had a greater comorbidity burden compared to other AAs and Whites. Further research, ideally prospective studies, are needed to understand these racial disparities.

Gender discrepancies and differences in motor and non-motor symptoms, cognition, and psychological outcomes in the treatment of Parkinson's disease with subthalamic deep brain stimulation

Available data suggest that there may be gender differences in the effect of STN-DBS in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). The aim of this study was to review data on gender discrepancies and gender differences in clinical outcomes in PD patients treated with deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS). Included were original studies that specifically examined gender discrepancies or gender differences in PD patients with STN-DBS. Men receive more DBS than women, for various indications. The decision-making process for DBS in women compared to men is more influenced by personal preferences and external factors. Motor symptoms improve in both genders, but bradykinesia improves more in men. The postoperative reduction of the levodopa equivalent daily dose seems to be more pronounced in men. Men show more cognitive deterioration and less improvement than women after STN-DBS. Women show more depressive symptoms before surgery, but they improve similarly to men. Men show more improvement in impulsivity and less decrease in impulsive behaviour symptoms than women. Anxiety and personality traits remain unchanged in both genders. Voice quality improves more in men and deteriorates less often than in women. Men gain fat-free mass and fat mass, but women only gain fat mass. Regarding sexual function the evidence is inconsistent. More urinary symptoms improve in women than in men. Pain and restless leg syndrome seems to improve more in men. Regarding quality of life, the evidence seems to be inconsistent, and activities of daily living seems to improve in both genders. Better prospective controlled studies, focusing directly on gender differences in PD patients treated with STN-DBS, are needed to better explain gender differences in STN-DBS for PD.

The Prevalence of Hospitalized Parkinson's Disease Patients in All Case Hospitalization among Different Race/Ethnic Subgroups in Hawaii

Background

Little is known about the epidemiology of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients in Native Hawaiian Or Other Pacific Islander (NHPI) and Asian American (AA) subgroups.

Objective

To determine if the prevalence of hospitalized PD patients is different across age groups and racial/ethnic subgroups in Hawaii.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of Hawaii statewide registry (2016-2020) hospitalization data for patients who were 50 years or older. PD patients were identified using an ICD 10 code: Parkinson's Disease (G20) as their primary/secondary hospitalization discharge diagnosis code. Demographic and clinical characteristics among racial/ethnic subgroups (White, Japanese, Filipino, Chinese, NHPI, or Other) were compared.

Results

Of 146,844 total hospitalized patients (n = 429,879 records), 1.6% (n = 2,401) had a PD diagnosis. The prevalence of hospitalized PD patients was 2.3% among Japanese and Chinese, followed by 1.7% for Whites, 1.2% for Filipinos and was lowest for NHPI with 0.9% (p < 0.001). As patient's age increased, the prevalence of hospitalized PD patients increased, with 80-84 years old for the highest age range (3.4%). The prevalence of hospitalized PD patients at 80-84 years old varied across the race/ethnic subgroups (Chinese 4.3%, Japanese 4.0%, Whites 3.7%, Filipinos 2.5%, NHPI 2.3%).

Conclusions

The prevalence of hospitalized PD patients among all case hospitalizations were lower for NHPI and Filipino compared to that of Japanese, Chinese, and Whites. As patients' age increased, the prevalence of hospitalized patients with PD increased, but less so in NHPI and Filipino groups. Further research is warranted to understand the reason for these observed differences among racial/ethnic subgroups.

Access to device-aided therapies in advanced Parkinson's disease: navigating clinician biases, patient preference, and prognostic uncertainty

Device-aided therapies (DAT), which include deep brain stimulation and pump-based continuous dopaminergic stimulation with either levodopa or apomorphine, are among the major advances in the clinical management of Parkinson's disease (PD). Although DAT are being increasingly offered earlier in the disease course, their classical indication remains advanced PD. Theoretically, every patient should be offered transition to DAT when faced with refractory motor and nonmotor fluctuations and functional decline. Worldwide clinical reality is far from these ideal, and, therefore, question the "real-world" equal opportunity of access to DAT for PD patients with advanced PD-even within a single health care system. Differences in access to care, referral pattern (timing and frequency), as well as physician biases (unconscious/implicit or conscious/explicit bias), and patients' preferences or health-seeking behaviour are to be considered. Compared to DBS, little information is available concerning infusion therapies, as well as neurologists' and patients' attitudes towards them. This viewpoint aims to be thought-provoking and to assist clinicians in moving through the process of DAT selection, by including in their decision algorithm their own biases, patient perspective, ethical concerns as well as the current unknowns surrounding PD prognosis and DAT-related long-term side effects for a given patient.

A systematic review of health disparities research in deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson's disease

Background

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the primary surgical intervention for Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with insufficient response to medication, significantly improving motor symptoms and quality of life. Despite FDA approval for over two decades, access to this therapy remains limited. This systematic review aims to evaluate the influence of gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and age on health disparities associated with DBS for PD, providing an overview of current research in this field.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases from 1960 to September 12th, 2023, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Studies that examine the disparities in accessing DBS among patients with PD were included, comparing different demographic factors. Findings were synthesized and presented narratively to identify and understand DBS disparities.

Results

After screening for relevance, 25 studies published between 1960 and 2023 were included, with 16 studies meeting full-text review criteria. While reviewing the references of the 16 articles, two additional studies were included, bringing the total number of included studies to 18. Most studies originated from the United States (44%). The identified studies were categorized as identifying disparities, understanding disparities, or reducing disparities. The majority focused on identifying disparities (72%), while fewer studies delved into understanding the underlying factors (28%). No studies evaluated strategies for reducing disparities. The findings indicate that elderly, female, and Black people, as well as those from low socioeconomic backgrounds and developing countries face greater obstacles in accessing DBS for PD.

Conclusion

This study highlights factors contributing to disparities in DBS utilization for PD, including race, gender, and socioeconomic status. Public health policymakers, practitioners, and clinicians should recognize these inequalities and work toward reducing disparities, particularly among vulnerable populations.

Trends and disparities in deep brain stimulation utilization in the United States: a Nationwide Inpatient Sample analysis from 1993 to 2017

Background

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an approved treatment option for Parkinson's Disease (PD), essential tremor (ET), dystonia, obsessive-compulsive disorder and epilepsy in the United States. There are disparities in access to DBS, and clear understanding of the contextual factors driving them is important. Previous studies aimed at understanding these factors have been limited by single indications or small cohort sizes. The aim of this study is to provide an updated and comprehensive analysis of DBS utilization for multiple indications to better understand the factors driving disparities in access.

Methods

The United States based National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was utilized to analyze the surgical volume and trends of procedures based on indication, using relevant ICD codes. Predictors of DBS use were analyzed using a logistic regression model. DBS-implanted patients in each indication were compared based on the patient-, hospital-, and outcome-related variables.

Findings

Our analysis of 104,356 DBS discharges from 1993 to 2017 revealed that the most frequent indications for DBS were PD (67%), ET (24%), and dystonia (4%). Although the number of DBS procedures has consistently increased over the years, radiofrequency ablation utilization has significantly decreased to only a few patients per year since 2003. Negative predictors for DBS utilization in PD and ET cohorts included age increase and female sex, while African American status was a negative predictor across all cohorts. Significant differences in patient-, hospital-, and outcome-related variables between DBS indications were also determined.

Interpretation

Demographic and socioeconomic-based disparities in DBS use are evident. Although racial disparities are present across all indications, other disparities such as age, sex, wealth, and insurance status are only relevant in certain indications.

Funding

This work was supported by Alan & Susan Hudson Cornerstone Chair in Neurosurgery at University Health Network.