Quantification of EEG reactivity in comatose patients

Methods of Evaluating EEG Reactivity in Adult Intensive Care Units: A Review

PURPOSE

EEG reactivity (EEG-R) has become widely used in intensive care units for diagnosing and prognosticating patients with disorders of consciousness. Despite efforts toward standardization, including the establishment of terminology for critical care EEG in 2012, the processes of testing and interpreting EEG-R remain inconsistent.

METHODS

A review was conducted on PubMed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria consisted of articles published between January 2012, and November 2022, testing EEG-R on adult intensive care unit patients. Exclusion criteria included articles focused on highly specialized stimulation equipment or animal, basic science, or small case report studies. The Quality In Prognostic Studies tool was used to assess risk of bias.

RESULTS

One hundred and five articles were identified, with 26 variables collected for each. EEG-R testing varied greatly, including the number of stimuli (range: 1-8; 26 total described), stimulus length (range: 2-30 seconds), length between stimuli (range: 10 seconds-5 minutes), frequency of stimulus application (range: 1-9), frequency of EEG-R testing (range: 1-3 times daily), EEG electrodes (range: 4-64), personnel testing EEG-R (range: neurophysiologists to nonexperts), and sedation protocols (range: discontinuing all sedation to no attempt). EEG-R interpretation widely varied, including EEG-R definitions and grading scales, personnel interpreting EEG-R (range: EEG specialists to nonneurologists), use of quantitative methods, EEG filters, and time to detect EEG-R poststimulation (range: 1-30 seconds).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the persistent heterogeneity of testing and interpreting EEG-R over the past decade, and contributing components were identified. Further many institutional efforts must be made toward standardization, focusing on the reproducibility and unification of these methods, and detailed documentation in the published literature.

Cortical responses to auditory stimulation predict the prognosis of patients with disorders of consciousness

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the prognosis of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) using auditory stimulation with electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings.

METHODS

We enrolled 72 patients with DoC in the study, which involved subjecting patients to auditory stimulation while EEG responses were recorded. Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) scores and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) were determined for each patient and followed up for three months. A frequency spectrum analysis was performed on the EEG recordings. Finally, the power spectral density (PSD) index was used to predict the prognosis of patients with DoC based on a support vector machine (SVM) model.

RESULTS

Power spectral analyses revealed that the cortical response to auditory stimulation showed a decreasing trend with decreasing consciousness levels. Auditory stimulation-induced changes in absolute PSD at the delta and theta bands were positively correlated with the CRS-R and GOS scores. Furthermore, these cortical responses to auditory stimulation had a good ability to discriminate between good and poor prognoses of patients with DoC.

CONCLUSIONS

Auditory stimulation-induced changes in the PSD were highly predictive of DoC outcomes.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our findings showed that cortical responses to auditory stimulation may be an important electrophysiological indicator of prognosis in patients with DoC.

Guidelines for Neuroprognostication in Comatose Adult Survivors of Cardiac Arrest

BACKGROUND

Among cardiac arrest survivors, about half remain comatose 72 h following return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Prognostication of poor neurological outcome in this population may result in withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy and death. The objective of this article is to provide recommendations on the reliability of select clinical predictors that serve as the basis of neuroprognostication and provide guidance to clinicians counseling surrogates of comatose cardiac arrest survivors.

METHODS

A narrative systematic review was completed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Candidate predictors, which included clinical variables and prediction models, were selected based on clinical relevance and the presence of an appropriate body of evidence. The Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Timing, Setting (PICOTS) question was framed as follows: "When counseling surrogates of comatose adult survivors of cardiac arrest, should [predictor, with time of assessment if appropriate] be considered a reliable predictor of poor functional outcome assessed at 3 months or later?" Additional full-text screening criteria were used to exclude small and lower-quality studies. Following construction of the evidence profile and summary of findings, recommendations were based on four GRADE criteria: quality of evidence, balance of desirable and undesirable consequences, values and preferences, and resource use. In addition, good practice recommendations addressed essential principles of neuroprognostication that could not be framed in PICOTS format.

RESULTS

Eleven candidate clinical variables and three prediction models were selected based on clinical relevance and the presence of an appropriate body of literature. A total of 72 articles met our eligibility criteria to guide recommendations. Good practice recommendations include waiting 72 h following ROSC/rewarming prior to neuroprognostication, avoiding sedation or other confounders, the use of multimodal assessment, and an extended period of observation for awakening in patients with an indeterminate prognosis, if consistent with goals of care. The bilateral absence of pupillary light response > 72 h from ROSC and the bilateral absence of N20 response on somatosensory evoked potential testing were identified as reliable predictors. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the brain > 48 h from ROSC and electroencephalography > 72 h from ROSC were identified as moderately reliable predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines provide recommendations on the reliability of predictors of poor outcome in the context of counseling surrogates of comatose survivors of cardiac arrest and suggest broad principles of neuroprognostication. Few predictors were considered reliable or moderately reliable based on the available body of evidence.

Common patterns of EEG reactivity in post-anoxic coma identified by quantitative analyses

OBJECTIVE

Description of typical kinds of EEG reactivity (EEG-R) in post-anoxic coma using a quantitative method.

METHODS

Study of 101 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients, 71 with good outcome (cerebral performance category scale ≤ 2). EEG was recorded 12-24 hours after cardiac arrest and four noxious, one auditory, and one visual stimulation were applied for 30 seconds each. Individual reference intervals for the power in the delta, theta, alpha, and beta bands were calculated based on six 2-second resting epochs just prior to stimulations. EEG-R in consecutive 2-second epochs after stimulation was expressed in Z-scores.

RESULTS

EEG-R occurred roughly equally frequent as an increase or as a decrease in EEG activity. Sternal rub and sound stimulation were most provocative with the most pronounced changes as an increase in delta activity 4.5-8.5 seconds after stimulation and a decrease in theta activity 0.5-4.5 seconds after stimulation. These parameters predicted good outcome with an AUC of 0.852 (95 % CI: 0.771-0.932).

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative EEG-R is a feasible method for identification of common types of reactivity, for evaluation of stimulation methods, and for prognostication.

SIGNIFICANCE

This method provides an objective measure of EEG-R revealing knowledge about the nature of EEG-R and its use as a diagnostic tool.

Merging Clinical and EEG Biomarkers in an Elastic-Net Regression for Disorder of Consciousness Prognosis Prediction

Patients with Disorder of Consciousness (DoC) entering Intensive Rehabilitation Units after a severe Acquired Brain Injury have a highly variable evolution of the state of consciousness which is a complex aspect to predict. Besides clinical factors, electroencephalography has clearly shown its potential into the identification of prognostic biomarkers of consciousness recovery. In this retrospective study, with a dataset of 271 patients with DoC, we proposed three different Elastic-Net regressors trained on different datasets to predict the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised value at discharge based on data collected at admission. One dataset was completely EEG-based, one solely clinical data-based and the last was composed by the union of the two. Each model was optimized, validated and tested with a robust nested cross-validation pipeline. The best models resulted in a median absolute test error of 4.54 [IQR = 4.56], 3.39 [IQR = 4.36], 3.16 [IQR = 4.13] for respectively the EEG, clinical and hybrid model. Furthermore, the hybrid model for what concerns overcoming an unresponsive wakefulness state and exiting a DoC results in an AUC of 0.91 and 0.88 respectively. Small but useful improvements are added by the EEG dataset to the clinical model for what concerns overcoming an unresponsive wakefulness state. Data-driven techniques and namely, machine learning models are hereby shown to be capable of supporting the complex decision-making process the practitioners must face.

Comatose Patients After Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: An Analysis Based on Quantitative Methods of EEG Reactivity

Objective

Every year, approximately 50–110/1,00,000 people worldwide suffer from cardiac arrest, followed by hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and approximately 40–66% of patients do not recover. The purpose of this study was to identify the brain network parameters and key brain regions associated with awakening by comparing the reactivity characteristics of the brain networks between the awakening and unawakening groups of CPR patients after coma, thereby providing a basis for further awakening interventions.

Method

This study involved a prospective cohort study. Using a 64-electrode electroencephalography (EEG) wireless 64A system, EEG signals were recorded from 16 comatose patients after CPR in the acute phase (<1 month) from 2019 to 2020. MATLAB (2017b) was used to quantitatively analyze the reactivity (power spectrum and entropy) and brain network characteristics (coherence and phase lag index) after pain stimulation. The patients were divided into an awakening group and an unawakening group based on their ability to execute commands or engage in repeated and continuous purposeful behavior after 3 months. The above parameters were compared to determine whether there were differences between the two groups.

Results

(1) Power spectrum: the awakening group had higher gamma, beta and alpha spectral power after pain stimulation in the frontal and parietal lobes, and lower delta and theta spectral power in the bilateral temporal and occipital lobes than the unawakening group. (2) Entropy: after pain stimulation, the awakening group had higher entropy in the frontal and parietal lobes and lower entropy in the temporal occipital lobes than the unawakening group. (3) Connectivity: after pain stimulation, the awakening group had stronger gamma and beta connectivity in nearly the whole brain, but weaker theta and delta connectivity in some brain regions (e.g., the frontal-occipital lobe and parietal-occipital lobe) than the unawakening group.

Conclusion

After CPR, comatose patients were more likely to awaken if there was a higher stimulation of fast-frequency band spectral power, higher entropy, stronger whole-brain connectivity and better retention of frontal-parietal lobe function after pain stimulation.

Quantitative Assessment of Electroencephalogram Reactivity in Comatose Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Objective assessment of the brain's responsiveness in comatose patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) support is essential to clinical care, but current approaches are limited by subjective methodology and inter-rater disagreement. Quantitative electroencephalogram (EEG) algorithms could potentially assist clinicians, improving diagnostic accuracy. We developed a quantitative, stimulus-based algorithm to assess EEG reactivity features in comatose patients on ECMO support. Patients underwent a stimulation protocol of increasing intensity (auditory, peripheral, and nostril stimulation). A total of 129 20-s EEG epochs were collected from 24 patients (age [Formula: see text], 10 females, 14 males) on ECMO support with a Glasgow Coma Scale[Formula: see text]8. EEG reactivity scores ([Formula: see text]-scores) were calculated using aggregated spectral power and permutation entropy for each of five frequency bands ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]. Parameter estimation techniques were applied to [Formula: see text]-scores to identify properties that replicate the decision process of experienced clinicians performing visual analysis. Spectral power changes from audio stimulation were concentrated in the [Formula: see text] band, whereas peripheral stimulation elicited an increase in spectral power across multiple bands, and nostril stimulation changed the entropy of the [Formula: see text] band. The findings of this pilot study on [Formula: see text]-score lay a foundation for a future prediction tool with clinical applications.

Predicting Neurological Outcome from Electroencephalogram Dynamics in Comatose Patients after Cardiac Arrest with Deep Learning

OBJECTIVE

Most cardiac arrest patients who are successfully resuscitated are initially comatose due to hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. Quantitative electroencephalography (EEG) provides valuable prognostic information. However, prior approaches largely rely on snapshots of the EEG, without taking advantage of temporal information.

METHODS

We present a recurrent deep neural network with the goal of capturing temporal dynamics from longitudinal EEG data to predict long-term neurological outcomes. We utilized a large international dataset of continuous EEG recordings from 1,038 cardiac arrest patients from seven hospitals in Europe and the US. Poor outcome was defined as a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 3-5, and good outcome as CPC score 0-2 at 3 to 6-months after cardiac arrest. Model performance is evaluated using 5-fold cross validation.

RESULTS

The proposed approach provides predictions which improve over time, beginning from an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.72-0.81) at 12 hours, and reaching 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91) by 66 h after cardiac arrest. At 66 h, (sensitivity, specificity) points of interest on the ROC curve for predicting poor outcomes were (32,99)%, (55,95)%, and (62,90)%, (99,23)%, (95,47)%, and (90,62)%; whereas for predicting good outcome, the corresponding operating points were (17,99)%, (47,95)%, (62,90)%, (99,19)%, (95,48)%, (70,90)%. Moreover, the model provides predicted probabilities that closely match the observed frequencies of good and poor outcomes (calibration error 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

These findings suggest that accounting for EEG trend information can substantially improve prediction of neurologic outcomes for patients with coma following cardiac arrest.

Delayed awakening in neurocritical care

Delayed awakening is defined as a persistent disorder of arousal or consciousness 48 to 72h after sedation interruption in critically ill patients. Delayed awakening is either a component of coma or delirium. It results in longer hospital stays and increased mortality. It is therefore a diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic emergency. In severe brain injured patients, delayed awakening may be related to the primary neurological injury or to secondary systemic insults related to organ failure associated with intensive care. In the present review, we propose diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic algorithms for managing delayed awaking in neuro-ICU brain injured patients.

Quantitative analysis of EEG reactivity for neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest

OBJECTIVE

To test whether 1) quantitative analysis of EEG reactivity (EEG-R) using machine learning (ML) is superior to visual analysis, and 2) combining quantitative analyses of EEG-R and EEG background pattern increases prognostic value for prediction of poor outcome after cardiac arrest (CA).

METHODS

Several types of ML models were trained with twelve quantitative features derived from EEG-R and EEG background data of 134 adult CA patients. Poor outcome was a Cerebral Performance Category score of 3-5 within 6 months.

RESULTS

The Random Forest (RF) trained on EEG-R showed the highest AUC of 83% (95-CI 80-86) of tested ML classifiers, predicting poor outcome with 46% sensitivity (95%-CI 40-51) and 89% specificity (95%-CI 86-92). Visual analysis of EEG-R had 80% sensitivity and 65% specificity. The RF was also the best classifier for EEG background (AUC 85%, 95%-CI 83-88) at 24 h after CA, with 62% sensitivity (95%-CI 57-67) and 84% specificity (95%-CI 79-88). Combining EEG-R and EEG background RF classifiers reduced the number of false positives.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative EEG-R using ML predicts poor outcome with higher specificity, but lower sensitivity compared to visual analysis of EEG-R, and is of some additional value to ML on EEG background data.

SIGNIFICANCE

Quantitative EEG-R using ML is a promising alternative to visual analysis and of some added value to ML on EEG background data.

Automatic continuous EEG signal analysis for diagnosis of delirium in patients with sepsis

OBJECTIVE

In critical care, continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring is useful for delirium diagnosis. Although visual cEEG analysis is most commonly used, automatic cEEG analysis has shown promising results in small samples. Here we aimed to compare visual versus automatic cEEG analysis for delirium diagnosis in septic patients.

METHODS

We obtained cEEG recordings from 102 septic patients who were scored for delirium six times daily. A total of 1252 cEEG blocks were visually analyzed, of which 805 blocks were also automatically analyzed.

RESULTS

Automatic cEEG analyses revealed that delirium was associated with 1) high mean global field power (p < 0.005), mainly driven by delta activity; 2) low average coherence across all electrode pairs and all frequencies (p < 0.01); 3) lack of intrahemispheric (fronto-temporal and temporo-occipital regions) and interhemispheric coherence (p < 0.05); and 4) lack of cEEG reactivity (p < 0.005). Classification accuracy was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, revealing a slightly higher area under the curve for visual analysis (0.88) than automatic analysis (0.74) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Automatic cEEG analysis is a useful supplement to visual analysis, and provides additional cEEG diagnostic classifiers.

SIGNIFICANCE

Automatic cEEG analysis provides useful information in septic patients.

Rapid annotation of seizures and interictal-ictal-injury continuum EEG patterns

BACKGROUND

Manual annotation of seizures and interictal-ictal-injury continuum (IIIC) patterns in continuous EEG (cEEG) recorded from critically ill patients is a time-intensive process for clinicians and researchers. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy and efficiency of an automated clustering method to accelerate expert annotation of cEEG.

NEW METHOD

We learned a local dictionary from 97 ICU patients by applying k-medoids clustering to 592 features in the time and frequency domains. We utilized changepoint detection (CPD) to segment the cEEG recordings. We then computed a bag-of-words (BoW) representation for each segment. We further clustered the segments by affinity propagation. EEG experts scored the resulting clusters for each patient by labeling only the cluster medoids. We trained a random forest classifier to assess validity of the clusters.

RESULTS

Mean pairwise agreement of 62.6% using this automated method was not significantly different from interrater agreements using manual labeling (63.8%), demonstrating the validity of the method. We also found that it takes experts using our method 5.31 ± 4.44 min to label the 30.19 ± 3.84 h of cEEG data, more than 45 times faster than unaided manual review, demonstrating efficiency.

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS

Previous studies of EEG data labeling have generally yielded similar human expert interrater agreements, and lower agreements with automated methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that long EEG recordings can be rapidly annotated by experts many times faster than unaided manual review through the use of an advanced clustering method.

EEG signal varies with different outcomes in comatose patients: A quantitative method of electroencephalography reactivity

BACKGROUND

Electroencephalographic reactivity (EEG-R) is a major predictor of outcome in comatose patients; however, the inter-rater reliability is limited due to the lack of homogeneous stimuli and quantitative interpretation.

NEW METHODS

EEG-R testing was employed in comatose patients by quantifiable electrical stimulation. Reactivity at different frequency bands was computed as the difference between pre- and post-stimulations in power spectra and connectivity function (including magnitude squared coherence and transfer entropy). The clinical outcomes were dichotomized as good and poor according to the recovery of consciousness. Signal discrimination of EEG-R was compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients (43%) regained consciousness at a 3-month follow-up. In the patients who regained consciousness, the EEG power increased significantly (P < 0.05) at the Alpha and Beta frequency bands after stimulation as compared to those with no behavioral awakening. Also, connectivity enhancement (including linear and nonlinear analysis) in the Beta and Gamma bands and connectivity decrease (nonlinear transfer entropy analysis) in the Delta band after stimulus were observed in the good outcome group.

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S)

In this study, the combined use of quantifiable stimulation and quantitative analysis shed new light on differentiating brain responses in comatose patients with good and poor outcomes as well as exploring the nature of EEG changes concerning the recovery of consciousness.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of quantifiable electrical stimulation and quantitative analysis with spectral power and connectivity for the EEG-R may be a promising method to predict the outcome of comatose patients.

Early EEG Features for Outcome Prediction After Cardiac Arrest in Children

PURPOSE

We aimed to determine which early EEG features and feature combinations most accurately predicted short-term neurobehavioral outcomes and survival in children resuscitated after cardiac arrest.

METHODS

This was a prospective, single-center observational study of infants and children resuscitated from cardiac arrest who underwent conventional EEG monitoring with standardized EEG scoring. Logistic regression evaluated the marginal effect of each EEG variable or EEG variable combinations on the outcome. The primary outcome was neurobehavioral outcome (Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score), and the secondary outcome was mortality. The authors identified the models with the highest areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), evaluated the optimal models using a 5-fold cross-validation approach, and calculated test characteristics maximizing specificity.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine infants and children were evaluated. Unfavorable neurologic outcome (Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score 4-6) occurred in 44 subjects (49%), including mortality in 30 subjects (34%). A model incorporating a four-level EEG Background Category (normal, slow-disorganized, discontinuous or burst-suppression, or attenuated-flat), stage 2 Sleep Transients (present or absent), and Reactivity-Variability (present or absent) had the highest AUC. Five-fold cross-validation for the optimal model predicting neurologic outcome indicated a mean AUC of 0.75 (range, 0.70-0.81) and for the optimal model predicting mortality indicated a mean AUC of 0.84 (range, 0.76-0.97). The specificity for unfavorable neurologic outcome and mortality were 95% and 97%, respectively. The positive predictive value for unfavorable neurologic outcome and mortality were both 86%.

CONCLUSIONS

The specificity of the optimal model using a combination of early EEG features was high for unfavorable neurologic outcome and mortality in critically ill children after cardiac arrest. However, the positive predictive value was only 86% for both outcomes. Therefore, EEG data must be considered in overall clinical context when used for neuroprognostication early after cardiac arrest.

Quantitative EEG reactivity and machine learning for prognostication in hypoxic-ischemic brain injury

OBJECTIVE

Electroencephalogram (EEG) reactivity is a robust predictor of neurological recovery after cardiac arrest, however interrater-agreement among electroencephalographers is limited. We sought to evaluate the performance of machine learning methods using EEG reactivity data to predict good long-term outcomes in hypoxic-ischemic brain injury.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical and EEG data of comatose cardiac arrest subjects. Electroencephalogram reactivity was tested within 72 h from cardiac arrest using sound and pain stimuli. A Quantitative EEG (QEEG) reactivity method evaluated changes in QEEG features (EEG spectra, entropy, and frequency features) during the 10 s before and after each stimulation. Good outcome was defined as Cerebral Performance Category of 1-2 at six months. Performance of a random forest classifier was compared against a penalized general linear model (GLM) and expert electroencephalographer review.

RESULTS

Fifty subjects were included and sixteen (32%) had good outcome. Both QEEG reactivity methods had comparable performance to expert EEG reactivity assessment for good outcome prediction (mean AUC 0.8 for random forest vs. 0.69 for GLM vs. 0.69 for expert review, respectively; p non-significant).

CONCLUSIONS

Machine-learning models utilizing quantitative EEG reactivity data can predict long-term outcome after cardiac arrest.

SIGNIFICANCE

A quantitative approach to EEG reactivity assessment may support prognostication in cardiac arrest.

Standards for Studies of Neurological Prognostication in Comatose Survivors of Cardiac Arrest: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Significant improvements have been achieved in cardiac arrest resuscitation and postarrest resuscitation care, but mortality remains high. Most of the poor outcomes and deaths of cardiac arrest survivors have been attributed to widespread brain injury. This brain injury, commonly manifested as a comatose state, is a marker of poor outcome and a major basis for unfavorable neurological prognostication. Accurate prognostication is important to avoid pursuing futile treatments when poor outcome is inevitable but also to avoid an inappropriate withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in patients who may otherwise have a chance of achieving meaningful neurological recovery. Inaccurate neurological prognostication leading to withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment and deaths may significantly bias clinical studies, leading to failure in detecting the true study outcomes. The American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science Subcommittee organized a writing group composed of adult and pediatric experts from neurology, cardiology, emergency medicine, intensive care medicine, and nursing to review existing neurological prognostication studies, the practice of neurological prognostication, and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. The writing group determined that the overall quality of existing neurological prognostication studies is low. As a consequence, the degree of confidence in the predictors and the subsequent outcomes is also low. Therefore, the writing group suggests that neurological prognostication parameters need to be approached as index tests based on relevant neurological functions that are directly related to the functional outcome and contribute to the quality of life of cardiac arrest survivors. Suggestions to improve the quality of adult and pediatric neurological prognostication studies are provided.

Electroencephalographic reactivity as predictor of neurological outcome in postanoxic coma: A multicenter prospective cohort study

Objective

Outcome prediction in patients after cardiac arrest (CA) is challenging. Electroencephalographic reactivity (EEG‐R) might be a reliable predictor. We aimed to determine the prognostic value of EEG‐R using a standardized assessment.

Methods

In a prospective cohort study, a strictly defined EEG‐R assessment protocol was executed twice per day in adult patients after CA. EEG‐R was classified as present or absent by 3 EEG readers, blinded to patient characteristics. Uncertain reactivity was classified as present. Primary outcome was best Cerebral Performance Category score (CPC) in 6 months after CA, dichotomized as good (CPC = 1–2) or poor (CPC = 3–5). EEG‐R was considered reliable for predicting poor outcome if specificity was ≥95%. For good outcome prediction, a specificity of ≥80% was used. Added value of EEG‐R was the increase in specificity when combined with EEG background, neurological examination, and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs).

Results

Of 160 patients enrolled, 149 were available for analyses. Absence of EEG‐R for poor outcome prediction had a specificity of 82% and a sensitivity of 73%. For good outcome prediction, specificity was 73% and sensitivity 82%. Specificity for poor outcome prediction increased from 98% to 99% when EEG‐R was added to a multimodal model. For good outcome prediction, specificity increased from 70% to 89%.

Interpretation

EEG‐R testing in itself is not sufficiently reliable for outcome prediction in patients after CA. For poor outcome prediction, it has no substantial added value to EEG background, neurological examination, and SSEPs. For prediction of good outcome, EEG‐R seems to have added value. ANN NEUROL 2019

EEG Reactivity Evaluation Practices for Adult and Pediatric Hypoxic-Ischemic Coma Prognostication in North America

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the variability in EEG reactivity evaluation practices during cardiac arrest prognostication.

METHODS

A survey of institutional representatives from North American academic hospitals participating in the Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortium was conducted to assess practice patterns involving EEG reactivity evaluation. This 10-question multiple-choice survey evaluated metrics related to technical, interpretation, personnel, and procedural aspects of bedside EEG reactivity testing and interpretation specific to cardiac arrest prognostication. One response per hospital was obtained.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 25 hospitals, including 7 pediatric hospitals. A standardized EEG reactivity protocol was available in 44% of centers. Sixty percent of respondents believed that reactivity interpretation was subjective. Reactivity bedside testing always (100%) started during hypothermia and was performed daily during monitoring in the majority (71%) of hospitals. Stimulation was performed primarily by neurodiagnostic technologists (76%). The mean number of activation procedures modalities tested was 4.5 (SD 2.1). The most commonly used activation procedures were auditory (83.3%), nail bed pressure (63%), and light tactile stimuli (63%). Changes in EEG amplitude alone were not considered consistent with EEG reactivity in 21% of centers.

CONCLUSIONS

There is substantial variability in EEG reactivity evaluation practices during cardiac arrest prognostication among North American academic hospitals. Efforts are needed to standardize protocols and nomenclature according with national guidelines and promote best practices in EEG reactivity evaluation.

Value and mechanisms of EEG reactivity in the prognosis of patients with impaired consciousness: a systematic review

Background

Electroencephalography (EEG) is a well-established tool for assessing brain function that is available at the bedside in the intensive care unit (ICU). This review aims to discuss the relevance of electroencephalographic reactivity (EEG-R) in patients with impaired consciousness and to describe the neurophysiological mechanisms involved.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search of the term “EEG reactivity and coma” using the PubMed database. The search encompassed articles published from inception to March 2018 and produced 202 articles, of which 42 were deemed relevant, assessing the importance of EEG-R in relationship to outcomes in patients with impaired consciousness, and were therefore included in this review.

Results

Although definitions, characteristics and methods used to assess EEG-R are heterogeneous, several studies underline that a lack of EEG-R is associated with mortality and unfavorable outcome in patients with impaired consciousness. However, preserved EEG-R is linked to better odds of survival. Exploring EEG-R to nociceptive, auditory, and visual stimuli enables a noninvasive trimodal functional assessment of peripheral and central sensory ascending pathways that project to the brainstem, the thalamus and the cerebral cortex. A lack of EEG-R in patients with impaired consciousness may result from altered modulation of thalamocortical loop activity by afferent sensory input due to neural impairment. Assessing EEG-R is a valuable tool for the diagnosis and outcome prediction of severe brain dysfunction in critically ill patients.

Conclusions

This review emphasizes that whatever the etiology, patients with impaired consciousness featuring a reactive electroencephalogram are more likely to have a favorable outcome, whereas those with a nonreactive electroencephalogram are prone to having an unfavorable outcome. EEG-R is therefore a valuable prognostic parameter and warrants a rigorous assessment. However, current assessment methods are heterogeneous, and no consensus exists. Standardization of stimulation and interpretation methods is needed.

EEG dynamical correlates of focal and diffuse causes of coma

BACKGROUND

Rapidly determining the causes of a depressed level of consciousness (DLOC) including coma is a common clinical challenge. Quantitative analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG) has the potential to improve DLOC assessment by providing readily deployable, temporally detailed characterization of brain activity in such patients. While used commonly for seizure detection, EEG-based assessment of DLOC etiology is less well-established. As a first step towards etiological diagnosis, we sought to distinguish focal and diffuse causes of DLOC through assessment of temporal dynamics within EEG signals.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed EEG recordings from 40 patients with DLOC with consensus focal or diffuse culprit pathology. For each recording, we performed a suite of time-series analyses, then used a statistical framework to identify which analyses (features) could be used to distinguish between focal and diffuse cases.

RESULTS

Using cross-validation approaches, we identified several spectral and non-spectral EEG features that were significantly different between DLOC patients with focal vs. diffuse etiologies, enabling EEG-based classification with an accuracy of 76%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that DLOC due to focal vs. diffuse injuries differ along several electrophysiological parameters. These results may form the basis of future classification strategies for DLOC and coma that are more etiologically-specific and therefore therapeutically-relevant.

The Nature of EEG Reactivity to Light, Sound, and Pain Stimulation in Neurosurgical Comatose Patients Evaluated by a Quantitative Method

EEG reactivity (EEG-R) is regarded as an important parameter in coma prognosis but knowledge is sparse on the nature of EEG changes due to different kinds of stimulation and their prognostic significance. EEG-R was quantified in a study of 39 comatose neurosurgical patients. Six 30-second standardized visual, auditory, and painful stimulations were applied. EEG-R in the delta, theta, alpha, and beta band was normalized in z-scores as the power of a stimulation epoch relative to average power of 6 resting epochs. Outcome measure was 3 months Glasgow Outcome Scale. Increase in EEG activity was related to poor outcome, was more common (13.4% of tests), and grew continuously during the 30-second stimulation epoch. Decrease in EEG activity was related to good outcome, was rarer (2.5%), and peaked around 15 seconds. Pain was the most provocative stimulation (20.4%) followed by sound (8.7%) and eye-opening (6.7%). Discrimination between good (n = 6) and poor (n = 33) outcome was best in the theta and alpha bands for pain stimulation in the first 10-20 seconds and for sound stimulation in the first 5 to 10 seconds, eye-opening did not discriminate. Increase in activity predicted poor outcome with a high specificity 100% (CI = 52%-100%) and a modest sensitivity of 39% (CI = 23%-58%). Decrease in activity predicted good outcome with a high specificity of 100% (CI = 87%-100%) and a modest sensitivity of 33% (CI = 6%-76%). This quantitative study reveals new knowledge about the nature of EEG-R, which contribute to the development of more reliable and objective clinical procedures for outcome prediction.

Predictive value of EEG in postanoxic encephalopathy: A quantitative model-based approach

INTRODUCTION

The majority of comatose patients after cardiac arrest do not regain consciousness due to severe postanoxic encephalopathy. Early and accurate outcome prediction is therefore essential in determining further therapeutic interventions. The electroencephalogram is a standardized and commonly available tool used to estimate prognosis in postanoxic patients. The identification of pathological EEG patterns with poor prognosis relies however primarily on visual EEG scoring by experts. We introduced a model-based approach of EEG analysis (state space model) that allows for an objective and quantitative description of spectral EEG variability.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed standard EEG recordings in 83 comatose patients after cardiac arrest between 2005 and 2013 in the intensive care unit of the University Hospital Zürich. Neurological outcome was assessed one month after cardiac arrest using the Cerebral Performance Category. For a dynamic and quantitative EEG analysis, we implemented a model-based approach (state space analysis) to quantify EEG background variability independent from visual scoring of EEG epochs. Spectral variability was compared between groups and correlated with clinical outcome parameters and visual EEG patterns.

RESULTS

Quantitative assessment of spectral EEG variability (state space velocity) revealed significant differences between patients with poor and good outcome after cardiac arrest: Lower mean velocity in temporal electrodes (T4 and T5) was significantly associated with poor prognostic outcome (p<0.005) and correlated with independently identified visual EEG patterns such as generalized periodic discharges (p<0.02). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis confirmed the predictive value of lower state space velocity for poor clinical outcome after cardiac arrest (AUC 80.8, 70% sensitivity, 15% false positive rate).

CONCLUSION

Model-based quantitative EEG analysis (state space analysis) provides a novel, complementary marker for prognosis in postanoxic encephalopathy.

Early prediction of coma recovery after cardiac arrest with blinded pupillometry

OBJECTIVE

Prognostication studies on comatose cardiac arrest (CA) patients are limited by lack of blinding, potentially causing overestimation of outcome predictors and self-fulfilling prophecy. Using a blinded approach, we analyzed the value of quantitative automated pupillometry to predict neurological recovery after CA.

METHODS

We examined a prospective cohort of 103 comatose adult patients who were unconscious 48 hours after CA and underwent repeated measurements of quantitative pupillary light reflex (PLR) using the Neurolight-Algiscan device. Clinical examination, electroencephalography (EEG), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), and serum neuron-specific enolase were performed in parallel, as part of standard multimodal assessment. Automated pupillometry results were blinded to clinicians involved in patient care. Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) at 1 year was the outcome endpoint.

RESULTS

Survivors (n = 50 patients; 32 CPC 1, 16 CPC 2, 2 CPC 3) had higher quantitative PLR (median = 20 [range = 13-41] vs 11 [0-55] %, p < 0.0001) and constriction velocity (1.46 [0.85-4.63] vs 0.94 [0.16-4.97] mm/s, p < 0.0001) than nonsurvivors. At 48 hours, a quantitative PLR < 13% had 100% specificity and positive predictive value to predict poor recovery (0% false-positive rate), and provided equal performance to that of EEG and SSEP. Reduced quantitative PLR correlated with higher serum neuron-specific enolase (Spearman r = -0.52, p < 0.0001).

INTERPRETATION

Reduced quantitative PLR correlates with postanoxic brain injury and, when compared to standard multimodal assessment, is highly accurate in predicting long-term prognosis after CA. This is the first prognostication study to show the value of automated pupillometry using a blinded approach to minimize self-fulfilling prophecy. Ann Neurol 2017;81:804-810.

Neurologic Recovery After Cardiac Arrest: a Multifaceted Puzzle Requiring Comprehensive Coordinated Care

OPINION STATEMENT

Surviving cardiac arrest (CA) requires a longitudinal approach with multiple levels of responsibility, including fostering a culture of action by increasing public awareness and training, optimization of resuscitation measures including frequent updates of guidelines and their timely implementation into practice, and optimization of post-CA care. This clearly goes beyond resuscitation and targeted temperature management. Brain-directed physiologic goals should dictate the post-CA management, as accumulating evidence suggests that the degree of hypoxic brain injury is the main determinant of survival, regardless of the etiology of arrest. Early assessment of the need for further hemodynamic and electrophysiologic cardiac interventions, adjusting ventilator settings to avoid hyperoxia/hypoxia while targeting high-normal to mildly elevated PaCO₂, maintaining mean arterial blood pressures >65 mmHg, evaluating for and treating seizures, maintaining euglycemia, and aggressively pursuing normothermia are key steps in reducing the bioenergetic failure that underlies secondary brain injury. Accurate neuroprognostication requires a multimodal approach with standardized assessments accounting for confounders while recognizing the importance of a delayed prognostication when there is any uncertainty regarding outcome. The concept of a highly specialized post-CA team with expertise in the management of post-CA syndrome (mindful of the brain-directed physiologic goals during the early post-resuscitation phase), TTM, and neuroprognostication, guiding the comprehensive care to the CA survivor, is likely cost-effective and should be explored by institutions that frequently care for these patients. Finally, providing tailored rehabilitation care with systematic reassessment of the needs and overall goals is key for increasing independence and improving quality-of-life in survivors, thereby also alleviating the burden on families. Emerging evidence from multicenter collaborations advances the field of resuscitation at an incredible pace, challenging previously well-established paradigms. There is no more room for "conventional wisdom" in saving the survivors of cardiac arrest.

Neurophysiological assessment of brain dysfunction in critically ill patients: an update

The aim of this review was to provide up-to-date information about the usefulness of clinical neurophysiology testing in the management of critically ill patients. Evoked potentials (EPs) and electroencephalogram (EEG) are non-invasive clinical neurophysiology tools that allow an objective assessment of the central nervous system's function at the bedside in intensive care unit (ICU). These tests are quite useful in diagnosing cerebral complications, and establishing the vital and functional prognosis in ICU. EEG keeps a particularly privileged importance in detecting seizures phenomena such as subclinical seizures and non-convulsive status epilepticus. Quantitative EEG (QEEG) analysis techniques commonly called EEG Brain mapping can provide obvious topographic displays of digital EEG signals characteristics, showing the potential distribution over the entire scalp including filtering, frequency, and amplitude analysis and color mapping. Evidences of usefulness of QEEG for seizures detection in ICU are provided by several recent studies. Furthermore, beyond detection of epileptic phenomena, changes of some QEEG panels are early warning indicators of sedation level as well as brain damage or dysfunction in ICU. EPs offer the opportunity for assessing brainstem's functional integrity, as well as subcortical and cortical brain areas. A multimodal use, combining EEG and various modalities of EPs is recommended since this allows a more accurate functional exploration of the brain and helps caregivers to tailor therapeutic measures according to neurological worsening trends and to anticipate the prognosis in ICU.

Electroencephalographic reactivity testing in unconscious patients: a systematic review of methods and definitions

Electroencephalographic (EEG) reactivity testing is often presented as a clear-cut element of electrophysiological testing. Absence of EEG reactivity is generally considered an indicator of poor outcome, especially in patients after cardiac arrest. However, guidelines do not clearly describe how to test for reactivity and how to evaluate the results. In a quest for clear guidelines, we performed a systematic review aimed at identifying testing methods and definitions of EEG reactivity. We systematically searched the literature between 1970 and May 2016. Methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the QUality In Prognostic Studies tool. Quality of the descriptions of stimulus protocol and reactivity definition was rated on a four-category grading scale based on reproducibility. We found that protocols for EEG reactivity testing vary greatly and descriptions of protocols are almost never replicable. Furthermore, replicable definitions of presence or absence of EEG reactivity are never provided. In order to draw firm conclusions on EEG reactivity as a prognostic factor, future studies should include a precise stimulation protocol and reactivity definition to facilitate guideline formation.

Stimulus induced bursts in severe postanoxic encephalopathy

OBJECTIVE

To report on a distinct effect of auditory and sensory stimuli on the EEG in comatose patients with severe postanoxic encephalopathy.

METHODS

In two comatose patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with severe postanoxic encephalopathy and burst-suppression EEG, we studied the effect of external stimuli (sound and touch) on the occurrence of bursts.

RESULTS

In patient A bursts could be induced by either auditory or sensory stimuli. In patient B bursts could only be induced by touching different facial regions (forehead, nose and chin). When stimuli were presented with relatively long intervals, bursts persistently followed the stimuli, while stimuli with short intervals (<1s) did not induce bursts. In both patients bursts were not accompanied by myoclonia. Both patients deceased.

CONCLUSIONS

Bursts in patients with a severe postanoxic encephalopathy can be induced by external stimuli, resulting in stimulus-dependent burst-suppression.

SIGNIFICANCE

Stimulus induced bursts should not be interpreted as prognostic favourable EEG reactivity.

Predicting Outcome in Comatose Patients: The Role of EEG Reactivity to Quantifiable Electrical Stimuli

Objective. To test the value of quantifiable electrical stimuli as a reliable method to assess electroencephalogram reactivity (EEG-R) for the early prognostication of outcome in comatose patients. Methods. EEG was recorded in consecutive adults in coma after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or stroke. EEG-R to standard electrical stimuli was tested. Each patient received a 3-month follow-up by the Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance categories (CPC) or modified Rankin scale (mRS) score. Results. Twenty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. In the CPR group, 6 of 7 patients with EEG-R had good outcomes (positive predictive value (PPV), 85.7%) and 4 of 5 patients without EEG-R had poor outcomes (negative predictive value (NPV), 80%). The sensitivity and specificity were 85.7% and 80%, respectively. In the stroke group, 6 of 7 patients with EEG-R had good outcomes (PPV, 85.7%); all of the 3 patients without EEG-R had poor outcomes (NPV, 100%). The sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 75%, respectively. Of all patients, the presence of EEG-R showed 92.3% sensitivity, 77.7% specificity, 85.7% PPV, and 87.5% NPV. Conclusion. EEG-R to quantifiable electrical stimuli might be a good positive predictive factor for the prognosis of outcome in comatose patients after CPR or stroke.

EEG in postanoxic coma: Prognostic and diagnostic value

Evolution of the EEG background pattern is a robust contributor to prediction of poor or good outcome of comatose patients after cardiac arrest. At 24h, persistent isoelectricity, low voltage activity, or burst-suppression with identical bursts predicts a poor outcome without false positives. Rapid recovery toward continuous patterns within 12h is strongly associated with a good neurological outcome. Predictive values are highest in the first 24h, despite the use of mild therapeutic hypothermia and sedative medication. Studies on reactivity or mismatch negativity have not included the EEG background pattern. Therefore, the additional predictive value of reactivity parameters remains unclear. Whether or not treatment of electrographic status epilepticus improves outcome is studied in the randomized multicenter Treatment of Electroencephalographic STatus epilepticus After cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (TELSTAR) trial (NCT02056236).