Electrical stimulation sensorimotor mapping with stereo-EEG

Emotional facial expression and perioral motor functions of the human auditory cortex

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the role of transverse temporal gyrus and adjacent cortex (TTG+) in facial expressions and perioral movements.

METHODS

In 31 patients undergoing stereo-electroencephalography monitoring, we describe behavioral responses elicited by electrical stimulation within the TTG+. Task-induced high-gamma modulation (HGM), auditory evoked responses, and resting-state connectivity were used to investigate the cortical sites having different types of responses on electrical stimulation.

RESULTS

Changes in facial expressions and perioral movements were elicited on electrical stimulation within TTG+ in 9 (29%) and 10 (32%) patients, respectively, in addition to the more common language responses (naming interruptions, auditory hallucinations, paraphasic errors). All functional sites showed auditory task induced HGM and evoked responses validating their location within the auditory cortex, however, motor sites showed lower peak amplitudes and longer peak latencies compared to language sites. Significant first-degree connections for motor sites included precentral, anterior cingulate, parahippocampal, and anterior insular gyri, whereas those for language sites included posterior superior temporal, posterior middle temporal, inferior frontal, supramarginal, and angular gyri.

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodal data suggests that TTG+ may participate in auditory-motor integration.

SIGNIFICANCE

TTG+ likely participates in facial expressions in response to emotional cues during an auditory discourse.

Functional Mapping of Movement and Speech Using Task-Based Electrophysiological Changes in Stereoelectroencephalography

Introduction

Stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) has become the predominant method for intracranial seizure localization. When imaging, semiology, and scalp EEG are not in full agreement or definitively localizing, implanted sEEG recordings are used to test candidate seizure onset zones (SOZs). Discovered SOZs may then be targeted for resection, laser ablation, or neurostimulation. If a SOZ is eloquent, resection and ablation are both contraindicated, so identifying functional representation is crucial for therapeutic decision making.

Objective

We present a novel functional brain mapping technique that utilizes task-based electrophysiological changes in sEEG during behavioral tasks and test this in pediatric and adult patients.

Methods

sEEG was recorded in twenty patients with epilepsy, aged 6-39 (12 female, 18 of 20 patients < 21 years old), who underwent implanted monitoring to identify seizure onset. Each performed 1) visually cued simple repetitive movements of the hand, foot, or tongue while electromyography was recorded, and 2) simple picture naming or verb generation speech tasks while audio was recorded. Broadband changes in the power spectrum of the sEEG were compared between behavior and rest.

Results

Electrophysiological functional mapping of movement and/or speech areas was completed in all 20 patients. Eloquent representation was identified in both cortex and white matter, and generally corresponded to classically described functional anatomic organization as well as other clinical mapping results. Robust maps of brain activity were identified in healthy brain, regions of developmental or acquired structural abnormality, and SOZs.

Conclusion

Task based electrophysiological mapping using broadband changes in the sEEG signal reliably identifies movement and speech representation in pediatric and adult epilepsy patients.

Neuropsychological outcomes after epilepsy surgery: A comparison of stereo electroencephalography and subdural electrodes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We analyzed the association of neuropsychological outcomes after epilepsy surgery with the intracranial electrode type (stereo electroencephalography [SEEG] and subdural electrodes [SDE]), and electrical stimulation mapping (ESM) of speech/language.

METHODS

Drug-resistant epilepsy patients who underwent comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation before and 1 year after epilepsy surgery were included. SEEG and SDE subgroups were matched by age, handedness, operated hemisphere, and seizure freedom. Postsurgical neuropsychological outcomes (adjusted for presurgical scores) and reliable change indices were analyzed as functions of electrode type and ESM.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients aged 6-29 years were included with similar surgical resection/ablation volumes in the SEEG and SDE subgroups. Most of the neuropsychological outcomes were comparable between SEEG and SDE subgroups; however, Working Memory and Processing Speed were significantly improved in the SEEG subgroup. Undergoing language ESM was associated with significant improvements in Spelling, Letter-Word Identification, Vocabulary, Verbal Comprehension, Verbal Learning, and Story Memory scores, but a decline in Calculation scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracranial evaluations with SEEG and SDE are comparable in terms of long-term postsurgical neuropsychological outcomes. Our data suggest that SEEG may be associated with improvements in working memory and processing speed, representing cognitive domains served by spatially distributed networks. Our study also supports wider use of language ESM before epilepsy surgery, preferably using other language tasks in addition to visual naming. Rather than the type of electrode, postsurgical neuropsychological outcomes are driven by whether language ESM was performed or not, with beneficial effects of language mapping.

An international survey of SEEG cortical stimulation practices

OBJECTIVE

Cortical stimulation is an important component of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG). Despite this, there is currently no standardized approach and significant heterogeneity in the literature regarding cortical stimulation practices. Via an international survey of SEEG clinicians, we sought to examine the spectrum of cortical stimulation practices to reveal areas of consensus and variability.

METHODS

A 68-item questionnaire was developed to understand cortical stimulation practices including neurostimulation parameters, interpretation of epileptogenicity, functional and cognitive assessment and subsequent surgical decisions. Multiple recruitment pathways were pursued, with the questionnaire distributed directly to 183 clinicians.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 56 clinicians across 17 countries with experience ranging from 2 to 60 years (M = 10.73, SD = 9.44). Neurostimulation parameters varied considerably, with maximum current ranging from 3 to 10 mA (M = 5.33, SD = 2.29) for 1 Hz and from 2 to 15 mA (M = 6.54, SD = 3.68) for 50 Hz stimulation. Charge density ranged from 8 to 200 μC/cm2 , with up to 43% of responders utilizing charge densities higher than recommended upper safety limits, i.e. 55 μC/cm2 . North American responders reported statistically significant higher maximum current (P < 0.001) for 1 Hz stimulation and lower pulse width for 1 and 50 Hz stimulation (P = 0.008, P < 0.001, respectively) compared to European responders. All clinicians evaluated language, speech, and motor function during cortical stimulation; in contrast, 42% assessed visuospatial or visual function, 29% memory, and 13% executive function. Striking differences were reported in approaches to assessment, classification of positive sites, and surgical decisions guided by cortical stimulation. Patterns of consistency were observed for interpretation of the localizing capacity of stimulated electroclinical seizures and auras, with habitual electroclinical seizures induced by 1 Hz stimulation considered the most localizing.

SIGNIFICANCE

SEEG cortical stimulation practices differed vastly across clinicians internationally, highlighting the need for consensus-based clinical guidelines. In particular, an internationally standardized approach to assessment, classification, and functional prognostication will provide a common clinical and research framework for optimizing outcomes for people with drug-resistant epilepsy.

Comparing electrical stimulation functional mapping with subdural electrodes and stereoelectroencephalography

OBJECTIVE

Electrical stimulation mapping (ESM) is the clinical standard for functional localization with subdural electrodes (SDE). As stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) has emerged as an alternative option, we compared functional responses, afterdischarges (ADs), and unwanted ESM-induced seizures (EISs) between the two electrode types.

METHODS

Incidence and current thresholds for functional responses (sensory, motor, speech/language), ADs, and EISs were compared between SDE and SEEG using mixed models incorporating relevant covariates.

RESULTS

We identified 67 SEEG ESM and 106 SDE ESM patients (7207 and 4980 stimulated contacts, respectively). We found similar incidence of language and motor responses between electrode types; however, more SEEG patients reported sensory responses. ADs and EISs occurred less commonly with SEEG than SDE. Current thresholds for language, face motor, and upper extremity (UE) motor responses and EIS significantly decreased with age. However, they were not affected by electrode type, premedication, or dominant hemispheric stimulation. AD thresholds were higher with SEEG than with SDE. For SEEG ESM, language thresholds remained below AD thresholds up to 26 years of age, whereas this relationship was inverse for SDE. Also, face and UE motor thresholds fell below AD thresholds at earlier ages for SEEG than SDE. AD and EIS thresholds were not affected by premedication.

SIGNIFICANCE

SEEG and SDE have clinically relevant differences for functional brain mapping with electrical stimulation. Although evaluation of language and motor regions is comparable between SEEG and SDE, SEEG offers a higher likelihood of identifying sensory areas. A lower incidence of ADs and EISs, and a favorable relationship between functional and AD thresholds suggest superior safety and neurophysiologic validity for SEEG ESM than SDE ESM.

Four-Way Wada: SEEG-based mapping with electrical stimulation, high frequency activity, and phase amplitude coupling to complement traditional Wada and functional MRI prior to epilepsy surgery

Presurgical evaluation of refractory epilepsy involves functional investigations to minimize postoperative deficit. Assessing language and memory is conventionally undertaken using Wada and fMRI, and occasionally supplemented by data from invasive intracranial electroencephalography, such as electrical stimulation, corticortical evoked potentials, mapping of high frequency activity and phase amplitude coupling. We describe the comparative and complementary role of these methods to inform surgical decision-making and functional prognostication. We used Wada paradigm to standardize testing across all modalities. Postoperative neuropsychological testing confirmed deficit predicted based on these methods.

Intermediate stimulation frequencies for language mapping using Stereo-EEG

OBJECTIVE

Identification of eloquent cortices is a prerequisite for the surgical plan but may be challenging, in particular for language areas (LAs), considering the complexity of language function and organization. Electrical intracerebral stimulations (ES) during Stereo-electroencephalography are an essential tool in the localization of LAs and high frequency ES (HFS, 50 Hz) are current gold standard. Low frequencies (1 Hz) are not effective. We aim to investigate different ES frequencies for establishing their utility in localizing LAs.

METHODS

We implemented an observational and prospective study evaluating frequencies lower than 50 and higher than 1 Hz; indicated as "intermediate" frequencies (IFS) performed at 6, 9 and 12 Hz and lasting 15 seconds. We included ten patients and carried out a standardized protocol comparing IFS to HFS.

RESULTS

Eighty-six ES were carried out in LAs, positive for a language interference in 61.6% without noteworthy difference between IFS and HFS. Among these, 53.3% IFS vs 21.7% HFS yielded no after-discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

IFS were similarly effective as HFS, with lower incidence of ADs. Their longer duration facilitated more accurate clinical testing.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our results are promising, suggesting that IFS can be useful in the study of LAs.

Decision-making in stereotactic epilepsy surgery

Surgery can cure or significantly improve both the frequency and the intensity of seizures in patients with medication-refractory epilepsy. The set of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions involved in the path from initial consultation to definitive surgery is complex and includes a multidisciplinary team of neurologists, neurosurgeons, neuroradiologists, and neuropsychologists, supported by a very large epilepsy-dedicated clinical architecture. In recent years, new practices and technologies have emerged that dramatically expand the scope of interventions performed. Stereoelectroencephalography has become widely adopted for seizure localization; stereotactic laser ablation has enabled more focal, less invasive, and less destructive interventions; and new brain stimulation devices have unlocked treatment of eloquent foci and multifocal onset etiologies. This article articulates and illustrates the full framework for how epilepsy patients are considered for surgical intervention, with particular attention given to stereotactic approaches.

Theoretical stereoelectroencephalography density on the brain convexity

INTRODUCTION

Invasive electroencephalography (EEG) remains the "gold standard" for diagnosing the epileptogenic zone in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and discrepancies between seizure semiology, video-EEG and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. However, the possibilities of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) to explore the brain surface remain a matter of debate and subdural EEG (SDEEG) is still preferred in some centers for cases when the supposed epileptogenic zone is on the brain convexity. The aim of our study was to evaluate the theoretical safe SEEG coverage on the brain convexity and to compare the theoretical SEEG cortical density with the usual SDEEG density.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our material included 10 hemispheres in 5 patients, who had been already investigated with SEEG for drug-resistant epilepsy. We translated our previously described technique in a theoretical model in an attempt to calculate the maximal number of avascular windows for each cerebral hemisphere. The distance between every entry point and the other entry points for each hemisphere was calculated using a mathematical formula. Subsequently, the theoretical SEEG coverage on the brain convexity was described using the maximal, minimal and average distances between each entry point and the closest 4 neighboring points. This type of measurement allows a direct comparison between SEEG and SDEEG in their ability to explore the brain convexity.

RESULTS

Ten hemispheres had 1328 safe entry points with a safety margin of 2.5 mm and a minimal distance of 2.5 mm between 2 entry points (average number of entry points: 132.8 (SD ± 5). The number of entry points in the explored 10 hemispheres varied from 104 to 156. The average distance between each entry point and its 4 neighbors was 11.47 mm. The maximal distance between two entry points in these 10 hemispheres was ranging from 20.28 to 27.23 mm (average: 24.67 mm). The closest entry points for the explored hemispheres were at an average distance of 4.67 mm (range: 2.82 - 5.96 mm). The average convexity surface was 223.68 cm2 (range: 204.63-238.77 cm2). The safe electrode density without electrode collision on the cortical surface was ranging from 0.46 to 0.69 electrodes per cm2 (average: 0.59 electrodes per cm2) (SD ± 0.023).

CONCLUSION

The theoretical SEEG cortical density is comparable with the usual SDEEG density. These findings, combined with the better safety profile of SEEG and the possibilities to explore deep cortical structures, explain the progressive shift from SDEEG to SEEG during the last years.

Smaller Knife, Fewer Seizures? Recent Advances in Minimally Invasive Techniques in Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery

Children with drug-resistant epilepsy are at high risk for developmental delay, increased mortality, psychiatric comorbidities, and requiring assistance with activities of daily living. Despite the advent of new and effective pharmacologic therapies, about one in 5 children will develop drug-resistant epilepsy, and most of these children continue to have seizures despite trials of other medication. Epilepsy surgery is often a safe and effective option which may offer seizure freedom or at least a significant reduction in seizure burden in many children. However, despite published evidence of safety and efficacy, epilepsy surgery remains underutilized in the pediatric population. Patient and family fears about the risks of surgery may contribute to this gap. Less invasive surgical techniques may be more palatable to children with epilepsy and their caregivers. In this review, we present recent advances in minimally invasive techniques for the surgical treatment of epilepsy as well as intriguing possibilities for the future. We describe the indications for, benefits of, and limits to minimally-invasive techniques including Stereo-encephalography, laser interstitial thermal ablation, deep brain stimulation, focused ultrasound, stereo-encephalography-guided radiofrequency ablation, endoscopic disconnections, and responsive neurostimulation.

Effects of stimulation intensity on intracranial cortico-cortical evoked potentials: A titration study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to investigate the optimal stimulation parameters for eliciting cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) for mapping functional and epileptogenic networks.

METHODS

We studied 13 patients with refractory epilepsy undergoing intracranial EEG monitoring. We systematically titrated the intensity of single-pulse electrical stimulation at multiple sites to assess the effect of increasing current on salient features of CCEPs such as N1 potential magnitude, signal to noise ratio, waveform similarity, and spatial distribution of responses. Responses at each incremental stimulation setting were compared to each other and to a final set of responses at the maximum intensity used in each patient (3.5-10 mA, median 6 mA).

RESULTS

We found that with a biphasic 0.15 ms/phase pulse at least 2-4 mA is needed to differentiate between non-responsive and responsive sites, and that stimulation currents of 6-7 mA are needed to maximize amplitude and spatial distribution of N1 responses and stabilize waveform morphology.

CONCLUSIONS

We determined a minimum stimulation threshold necessary for eliciting CCEPs, as well as a point at which the current-dependent relationship of several response metrics all saturate.

SIGNIFICANCE

This titration study provides practical, immediate guidance on optimal stimulation parameters to study specific features of CCEPs, which have been increasingly used to map both functional and epileptic brain networks in humans.

Evoking highly focal percepts in the fingertips through targeted stimulation of sulcal regions of the brain for sensory restoration

Background:

Paralysis and neuropathy, affecting millions of people worldwide, can be accompanied by significant loss of somatosensation. With tactile sensation being central to achieving dexterous movement, brain-computer interface (BCI) researchers have used intracortical and cortical surface electrical stimulation to restore somatotopically-relevant sensation to the hand. However, these approaches are restricted to stimulating the gyral areas of the brain. Since representation of distal regions of the hand extends into the sulcal regions of human primary somatosensory cortex (S1), it has been challenging to evoke sensory percepts localized to the fingertips.

Objective/hypothesis:

Targeted stimulation of sulcal regions of S1, using stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) depth electrodes, can evoke focal sensory percepts in the fingertips.

Methods:

Two participants with intractable epilepsy received cortical stimulation both at the gyri via high-density electrocorticography (HD-ECoG) grids and in the sulci via SEEG depth electrode leads. We characterized the evoked sensory percepts localized to the hand.

Results:

We show that highly focal percepts can be evoked in the fingertips of the hand through sulcal stimulation. fMRI, myelin content, and cortical thickness maps from the Human Connectome Project elucidated specific cortical areas and sub-regions within S1 that evoked these focal percepts. Within-participant comparisons showed that percepts evoked by sulcal stimulation via SEEG electrodes were significantly more focal (80% less area; p = 0.02) and localized to the fingertips more often, than by gyral stimulation via HD-ECoG electrodes. Finally, sulcal locations with consistent modulation of high-frequency neural activity during mechanical tactile stimulation of the fingertips showed the same somatotopic correspondence as cortical stimulation.

Conclusions:

Our findings indicate minimally invasive sulcal stimulation via SEEG electrodes could be a clinically viable approach to restoring sensation.

Fast Automated Stereo-EEG Electrode Contact Identification and Labeling Ensemble

INTRODUCTION

Stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG) has emerged as the preferred modality for intracranial monitoring in drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) patients being evaluated for neurosurgery. After implantation of SEEG electrodes, it is important to determine the neuroanatomic locations of electrode contacts (ECs), to localize ictal onset and propagation, and integrate functional information to facilitate surgical decisions. Although there are tools for coregistration of preoperative MRI and postoperative CT scans, identification, sorting, and labeling of SEEG ECs is often performed manually, which is resource intensive. We report development and validation of a software named Fast Automated SEEG Electrode Contact Identification and Labeling Ensemble (FASCILE).

METHODS

FASCILE is written in Python 3.8.3 and employs a novel automated method for identifying ECs, assigning them to respected SEEG electrodes, and labeling. We compared FASCILE with our clinical process of identifying, sorting, and labeling ECs, by computing localization error in anteroposterior, superoinferior, and lateral dimensions. We also measured mean Euclidean distances between ECs identified by FASCILE and the clinical method. We compared time taken for EC identification, sorting, and labeling for the software developer using FASCILE, a first-time clinical user using FASCILE, and the conventional clinical process.

RESULTS

Validation in 35 consecutive DRE patients showed a mean overall localization error of 0.73 ± 0.15 mm. FASCILE required 10.7 ± 5.5 min/patient for identifying, sorting, and labeling ECs by a first-time clinical user, compared to 3.3 ± 0.7 h/patient required for the conventional clinical process.

CONCLUSION

Given the accuracy, speed, and ease of use, we expect FASCILE to be used frequently for SEEG-driven epilepsy surgery. It is freely available for noncommercial use. FASCILE is specifically designed to expedite localization of ECs, assigning them to respective SEEG electrodes (sorting), and labeling them and not for coregistration of CT and MRI data as there are commercial software available for this purpose.

Cognitive and Emotional Mapping With SEEG

Mapping of cortical functions is critical for the best clinical care of patients undergoing epilepsy and tumor surgery, but also to better understand human brain function and connectivity. The purpose of this review is to explore existing and potential means of mapping higher cortical functions, including stimulation mapping, passive mapping, and connectivity analyses. We examine the history of mapping, differences between subdural and stereoelectroencephalographic approaches, and some risks and safety aspects, before examining different types of functional mapping. Much of this review explores the prospects for new mapping approaches to better understand other components of language, memory, spatial skills, executive, and socio-emotional functions. We also touch on brain-machine interfaces, philosophical aspects of aligning tasks to brain circuits, and the study of consciousness. We end by discussing multi-modal testing and virtual reality approaches to mapping higher cortical functions.

Electrical Stimulation Mapping of Brain Function: A Comparison of Subdural Electrodes and Stereo-EEG

Despite technological and interpretative advances, the non-invasive modalities used for pre-surgical evaluation of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), fail to generate a concordant anatomo-electroclinical hypothesis for the location of the seizure onset zone in many patients. This requires chronic monitoring with intracranial electroencephalography (EEG), which facilitates better localization of the seizure onset zone, and allows evaluation of the functional significance of cortical regions-of-interest by electrical stimulation mapping (ESM). There are two principal modalities for intracranial EEG, namely subdural electrodes and stereotactic depth electrodes (stereo-EEG). Although ESM is considered the gold standard for functional mapping with subdural electrodes, there have been concerns about its utility with stereo-EEG. This is mainly because subdural electrodes allow contiguous sampling of the dorsolateral convexity of cerebral hemispheres, and permit delineation of the extent of eloquent functional areas on the cortical surface. Stereo-EEG, while having relatively sparse sampling on the cortical surface, offers the ability to access the depth of sulci, mesial and basal surfaces of cerebral hemispheres, and deep structures such as the insula, which are largely inaccessible to subdural electrodes. As stereo-EEG is increasingly the preferred modality for intracranial monitoring, we find it opportune to summarize the literature for ESM with stereo-EEG in this narrative review. Emerging evidence shows that ESM for defining functional neuroanatomy is feasible with stereo-EEG, but probably requires a different approach for interpretation and clinical decision making compared to ESM with subdural electrodes. We have also compared ESM with stereo-EEG and subdural electrodes, for current thresholds required to evoke desired functional responses vs. unwanted after-discharges. In this regard, there is preliminary evidence that ESM with stereo-EEG may be safer than ESM with subdural grids. Finally, we have highlighted important unanswered clinical and scientific questions for ESM with stereo-EEG in the hope to encourage future research and collaborative efforts.

Effects of depth electrode montage and single-pulse electrical stimulation sites on neuronal responses and effective connectivity

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal depth electrode montages for the assessment of effective connectivity based on single-pulse electrical stimulation (SPES). To determine the effect of SPES locations on the extent of resulting neuronal propagations.

METHODS

We studied 14 epilepsy patients who underwent invasive monitoring with depth electrodes and measurement of cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) and cortico-cortical spectral responses (CCSRs). We determined the effects of electrode montage and stimulus sites on the CCEP/CCSR amplitudes.

RESULTS

Bipolar and Laplacian montages effectively reduced the degree of SPES-related signal deflections at extra-cortical levels, including outside the brain, while maintaining those at the cortical level. SPES of structures more proximal to the deep white matter, compared to the cortical surface, elicited greater CCEPs and CCSRs.

CONCLUSIONS

On depth electrode recording, bipolar and Laplacian montages are suitable for measurement of near-field CCEPs and CCSRs. SPES of the white matter axons may induce neuronal propagations to extensive regions of the cerebral cortex.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study helps to establish the practical guidelines on the diagnostic use of CCEPs/CCSRs.