Gold Coast diagnostic criteria increase sensitivity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Upper motor neuron assessment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using the patellar tendon reflex and motor-evoked potentials to the lower limbs

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) diagnosis relies on signs of progressive damage to both lower motoneuron (LMN), given by clinical examination and electromyography (EMG), and upper motoneuron (UMN), given by clinical examination only. Recognition of UMN involvement, however, is still difficult, so that diagnostic delay often remains too long. Shortening the time to clinical and genetic diagnosis is essential in order to provide accurate information to patients and families, avoid time-consuming investigations and for appropriate care management. This study investigates whether combined patellar tendon reflex recording with motor-evoked potentials to the lower limbs (T-MEP-LL) is relevant to assess corticospinal function in ALS, so that it might serve as a tool improving diagnosis. T-MEP-LL were recorded in 135 patients with suspected motor neuron disease (MND) from February 2010 to March 2021. The sensitivity, specificity, and ability to improve diagnosis when added to Awaji and Gold Coast criteria were determined. The main finding of the study is that T-MEP-LL can detect UMN dysfunction with a 70% sensitivity and 63% specificity when UMN clinical signs are lacking. The sensitivity reaches 82% when considering all MND patients. Moreover, at first evaluation, using T-MEP-LL to quantify reflex briskness and to measure central conduction time, can improve the diagnostic accuracy. T-MEP-LL is easy to perform and does not need any electrical stimulation, making the test rapid, and painless. By the simultaneous quantification of both UMN and LMN system, it could also help to identify different phenotype with more accuracy than clinical examination in this broad-spectrum pathology. The question whether T-MEP-LL could further be a real biomarker need further prospective studies.

Diagnostic criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present review will discuss the evolution of diagnostic criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and biomarker considerations.

RECENT FINDINGS

To address the limitations of existing ALS diagnostic criteria, a consortium of key stakeholders developed the Gold Coast consensus criteria (GCC). The GCC has similar or greater sensitivity compared with the revised El Escorial (rEEC) and Awaji criteria (AC), particularly for atypical phenotypes, maintained across disease duration, severity, and site of onset. In addition to improving diagnostic sensitivity, using the GCC in clinical trials may promote an increased enrolment of up to 50% of ALS patients who do not currently meet the full diagnostic eligibility requirements of the rEEC. Future inclusion of genetic biomarkers may mitigate some limitations of the GCC, to further improve diagnostic utility. In advance of such a process, validation of these biomarkers will be required before inclusion as additional criteria.

SUMMARY

The GCC are simpler to use than previous consensus criteria, with demonstrated greater sensitivity and, enabling an earlier and more definitive ALS diagnosis, thereby facilitating wider enrolment into clinical trials. Broader implementation of the GCC in clinical trial settings is currently underway, globally.

Assessment of whole-body muscle MRI for the early diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate muscle signal abnormalities on whole-body muscle MRI with T2 and diffusion-weighted imaging in early ALS stages.

METHODS

101 muscles were analyzed in newly diagnosed ALS patients and healthy controls on a whole-body MRI protocol including four-point T2-Dixon imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging (b0 and b800). Sensitivity and inter-observer agreement were assessed.

RESULTS

15 patients (mean age, 64 +/- 12 [SD], 9 men) who met the Awaji-Shima criteria for definite, probable or possible ALS and 9 healthy controls were assessed (mean age, 53 +/- 13 [SD], 2 men). 61 % of the muscles assessed in ALS patients (62/101) showed signal hyperintensities on T2-weighted imaging, mainly in the upper and lower extremities (legs, hands and feet). ALS patients had a significantly higher number of involved muscles compared to healthy controls (p = 0,006). Diffusion-weighted imaging allowed for the detection of additional involvement in 22 muscles, thus improving the sensitivity of whole-body MRI from 60 % (using T2-weighted imaging only) up to 80 % (with the combination of T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging).

CONCLUSIONS

ALS patients exhibited significant muscle signal abnormalities on T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging in early disease stages. Whole-body MRI could be used for pre-EMG mapping of muscle involvement in order to choose suitable targets, thus improving early diagnosis.

Threshold tracking transcranial magnetic stimulation and neurofilament light chain as diagnostic aids in ALS

OBJECTIVE

There is a need for sensitive biomarkers in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), to enable earlier diagnosis and to help assess potential treatments. The main objective of this study was to compare two potential biomarkers, threshold-tracking short-interval cortical inhibition (T-SICI), which has shown promise as a diagnostic aid, and neurofilament light chains (NfL).

METHODS

Ninety-seven patients with ALS (mean age 67.1 ± 11.5 years) and 53 ALS mimics (aged 62.4 ± 12.9) were included. Mean disease duration was 14 months ±14.1. Patients were evaluated with revised ALS functional rating score (ALSFRS-R), Penn upper motor neuron score (UMNS), muscle strength using the Medical Research Council (MRC) score and examined with T-SICI, quantitative electromyography (EMG), and NfL measured in spinal fluid.

RESULTS

NfL increased with increasing UMNS (rho = 0.45, p = 8.2 × 10-6) whereas T-SICI at 2.5 ms paradoxically increased toward normal values (rho = 0.53, p = 1.9 × 10-7). However, these two measures were uncorrelated. Discrimination between ALS patients and mimics was best for NfL (area under ROC curve 0.842, sensitivity 84.9%, specificity 83.5%), compared with T-SICI (0.675, 39.6%, 91.8%). For the patients with no UMN signs, NfL also discriminated best (0.884, 89.3%, 82.6%), compared with T-SICI (0.811, 71.4%, 82.6%). However, when combining NfL and T-SICI, higher AUCs of 0.854 and 0.922 and specificities of 93.8 and 100 were found when considering all patients and patients with no UMN signs, respectively.

INTERPRETATION

Both T-SICI and NfL correlated with UMN involvement and combined, they provided a strong discrimination between ALS patients and ALS mimics.

Registration of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Validity in the Danish National Patient Registry

Purpose

Health care databases are a valuable source for epidemiological research on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) if diagnosis codes are valid. We evaluated the validity of the diagnostic codes for ALS in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR).

Patients and Methods

We obtained data from the DNPR for all adult (>17 years) patients registered with ALS in Denmark between 1987 and 2022 (median population of 4.2 million during the study period). We randomly selected adult patients living in the North Denmark Region and Central Denmark Region (median population 1.4 million), with a primary discharge diagnosis code of ALS, diagnosed at three departments of neurology. We retrieved and reviewed medical records and estimated the positive predictive value (PPV) of the ALS diagnosis.

Results

Over 36 years, we identified 5679 patients. From the validation cohort of 300 patients, we were able to retrieve 240 (80%) medical records, and 215 ALS diagnoses were confirmed. The overall positive predictive value was 89.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 85.1-92.8). The highest PPV was achieved for diagnoses registered for patients aged ≥70 years (93.8; 95% CI: 86.2-97.3) compared to patients <60 years (83.4; 95% CI: 73.3-90.7).

Conclusion

We found a high PPV of primary diagnostic codes for ALS from Danish departments of neurology, demonstrating high validity. Thus, the DNPR is a well-suited data source for large-scale epidemiological research on ALS.

Serial electrodiagnostic testing: Utility and indications in adult neurological disorders

Although existing guidelines address electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing in identifying neuromuscular conditions, guidance regarding the uses and limitations of serial (or repeat) EDX testing is limited. By assessing neurophysiological change longitudinally across time, serial electrodiagnosis can clarify a diagnosis and potentially provide valuable prognostic information. This monograph presents four broad indications for serial electrodiagnosis in adult peripheral neurological disorders. First, where clinical change has raised suspicion for a new or ongoing lesion, EDX reassessment for spatial spread of abnormality, involvement of previously normal muscle or nerve, and/or evolving pathophysiology can clarify a diagnosis. Second, where diagnosis of a progressive neuromuscular condition is uncertain, electrophysiological data from a second time point can confirm or refute suspicion. Third, to establish prognosis after a static nerve injury, a repeat study can assess the presence and extent of reinnervation. Finally, faced with a limited initial study (as when complicated by patient or environmental factors), a repeat EDX study can supplement missing or limited data to provide needed clarity. Repeat EDX studies carry certain limitations, however, such as with prognostication in the setting of remote or chronic lesions, sensory predominant fascicular injury, or mild axonal injury. Nevertheless, serial electrodiagnosis remains a valuable and underused tool in the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of neuromuscular conditions.

Diagnostic utility of Gold Coast criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Asia

Objective: This study aimed to reveal the diagnostic utility of Gold Coast (GC) criteria in Japanese patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) by comparing the sensitivity/specificity with revised El Escorial (R-EE) and Awaji criteria, because its utility has not been studied in Asian ALS. Methods: Consecutive 639 patients (529 with ALS and 110 with ALS mimics), who were suspected of ALS and referred to three Japanese ALS centers, were enrolled. Diagnostic accuracy and characteristics of false positive and negative in GC criteria were compared with those of the Awaji and R-EE criteria. Patients were categorized as definite, probable or possible ALS according to each criterion. Results: The sensitivity of GC criteria (96.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 95.3-98.3%) was higher than that of Awaji (89.6%, 95% CI: 87.0-92.2%) and R-EEC (89.2, 95% CI: 86.6-91.8%) criteria (both, p < 0.001). The specificity was also higher with GC criteria (77.3%, 95% CI: 69.5-85.1%) than Awaji (65.5%, 95% CI: 56.6-74.4%) and R-EEC (66.4, 95% CI: 57.6-75.2%) criteria (both, p < 0.01). Using GC criteria, patients with cervical spondylosis and Parkinson's syndrome tended to be diagnosed with ALS (i.e. "false positive"). Additionally, ALS patients diagnosed only by GC criteria less frequently had upper motor neuron (UMN) signs, compared with the other two criteria. Conclusion: Gold Coast criteria improve diagnostic accuracy for ALS in an Asian population, especially in patients with subtle UMN signs.

Contribution of neurophysiology to the diagnosis and monitoring of ALS

This chapter describes the role of neurophysiological techniques in diagnosing and monitoring amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Despite many advances, electromyography (EMG) remains a keystone investigation from which to build support for a diagnosis of ALS, demonstrating the pathophysiological processes of motor unit hyperexcitability, denervation and reinnervation. We consider development of the different diagnostic criteria and the role of EMG therein. While not formally recognised by established diagnostic criteria, we discuss the pioneering studies that have demonstrated the diagnostic potential of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex and highlight the growing evidence for TMS in the diagnostic process. Finally, accurately monitoring disease progression is crucial for the successful implementation of clinical trials. Neurophysiological measures of disease state have been incorporated into clinical trials for over 20 years and we review prominent techniques for assessing disease progression.

Artificial intelligence for automatic classification of needle EMG signals: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review provides an overview of artificial intelligence (AI), including machine and deep learning techniques, in the interpretation of clinical needle electromyography (nEMG) signals.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase and Web of Science was conducted to find peer-reviewed journal articles. All papers published after 2010 were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed with CLAIM (checklist for artificial intelligence in medical imaging).

RESULTS

51 studies were identified that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 61% used open-source EMGlab data set to develop models to classify nEMG signal in healthy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and myopathy (25 subjects). Only two articles developed models to classify signals recorded at rest. Most articles reported high performance accuracies, but many were subject to bias and overtraining.

CONCLUSIONS

Current AI-models of nEMG signals are not sufficient for clinical implementation. Suggestions for future research include emphasizing the need for an optimal training and validation approach using large datasets of clinical nEMG data from a diverse patient population.

SIGNIFICANCE

The outcomes of this study and the suggestions made aim to contribute to developing AI-models that can effectively handle signal quality variability and are suitable for daily clinical practice in interpreting nEMG signals.

Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of MND/ALS: IFCN handbook chapter

•Accurate and rapid diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is important to prevent erroneous interventions. •The recent Gold Coast criteria are easily applicable and have high sensitivity and specificity. •Future developments will help to distinguish ALS as a specific clinical-pathologic entity.

Accurate and rapid diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is essential in order to provide accurate information for patient and family, to avoid time-consuming investigations and to permit an appropriate management plan. ALS is variable regarding presentation, disease progression, genetic profile and patient reaction to the diagnosis. It is obviously important to exclude treatable conditions but, in most patients, for experienced neurologists the diagnosis is clear-cut, depending on the presence of progressive upper and lower motor neuron signs. Patients with signs of restricted lower motor neuron (LMN) or upper motor neuron (UMN) dysfunction may present diagnostic difficulty, but electromyography (EMG) is often a determinant diagnostic test since it may exclude other disorders. Transcranial magnetic stimulation may aid detection of UMN dysfunction, and brain and spinal cord MRI, ultrasound and blood neurofilament measurements, have begun to have clinical impact, although none are themselves diagnostic tests. Several sets of diagnostic criteria have been proposed in the past; all rely on clinical LMN and UMN signs in different anatomic territories, EMG changes, exclusion of other disorders, and disease progression, in particular evidence of spreading to other anatomic territories. Fasciculations are a characteristic clinical feature and increased importance is now attached to fasciculation potentials detected by EMG, when associated with classical signs of denervation and reinnervation. The Gold Coast diagnostic criteria rely on the presence of UMN and LMN signs in one (or more) anatomic territory, or LMN signs in two (or more) anatomic territories, recognizing the fundamental clinical requirements of disease progression and exclusion of other diseases. Recent studies confirm a high sensitivity without loss of specificity using these Gold Coast criteria. In considering the diagnosis of ALS a critical question for future understanding is whether ALS should be considered a syndrome or a specific clinico-pathologic entity; this can only be addressed in the light of more complete knowledge.

Management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in clinical practice: Results of the expert consensus using the Delphi methodology

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rare disease characterized by a progressive and irreversible degeneration of upper and lower motor neurons leading to death. In France, limited data exist describing the criteria used in clinical practice for diagnosis and follow-up, and how novel therapies may fit in. The objective of this Delphi panel was to obtain an overview of current French practices in ALS diagnosis, management, and follow-up by determining the scales and criteria used in clinical practice outside of clinical trials, as well as the place of a future treatment like AMX0035, acting on endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and mitochondrial dysfunction, in the current therapeutic strategies. A questionnaire was administered to 24 ALS healthcare providers practicing in ALS centers in France. Two rounds of remote voting were organized, before proposition of final consensus statements. Consensus was considered reached when at least 66% of the voters agreed. Consensus were obtained to define the new Gold Coast criteria as the ones used in clinical practice to establish the diagnosis of ALS, thus replacing the revised El Escorial criteria, considered too complex and now mainly used to characterize the patient populations to be included in clinical trials. The clinical factors considered to establish ALS diagnosis are mainly the demonstration of progression of the motor deficit and elimination of differential diagnoses. The ALSFRS-R scale is used in daily clinical practice to assess patient's functional impairment in terms of number of points lost, with the bulbar, respiratory, and fine motor subscores being the most important to evaluate independently. A critical medical need was identified regarding the provision of new therapeutic alternatives in ALS. The panel members would support the earliest management of patients. In this landscape, based on data from a very encouraging phase II (Centaur trial), AMX0035 represents a new tool of choice in current treatment strategies for all patients for whom experts are confident in the diagnosis of ALS, in combination with riluzole. These results will need to be confirmed by the ongoing phase III trial (Phoenix trial).

Diagnostic accuracy of nerve excitability and compound muscle action potential scan derived biomarkers in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The lack of reliable early biomarkers still causes substantial diagnostic delays in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The aim was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a novel electrophysiological protocol in patients with suspected motor neuron disease (MND).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with suspected MND were prospectively recruited at our tertiary referral centre for MND in Utrecht, The Netherlands. Procedures were performed in accordance with the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. In addition to the standard diagnostic workup, an electrophysiological protocol of compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scans and nerve excitability tests was performed on patients' thenar muscles. The combined diagnostic yield of nerve excitability and CMAP scan based motor unit number estimation was compared to the Awaji and Gold Coast criteria and their added value was determined.

RESULTS

In all, 153 ALS or progressive muscular atrophy patients, 63 disease controls and 43 healthy controls were included. Our electrophysiological protocol had high diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.80-0.90), even in muscles with undetectable axon loss (AUC 0.78, 95% CI 0.70-0.85) and in bulbar-onset patients (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.73-0.95). Twenty-four of 33 (73%) ALS patients who could not be diagnosed during the same visit were correctly identified, as well as 8/13 (62%) ALS patients not meeting the Gold Coast criteria and 49/59 (83%) ALS patients not meeting the Awaji criteria during this first visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Our practical and non-invasive electrophysiological protocol may improve early diagnosis in clinically challenging patients with suspected ALS. Routine incorporation may boost early diagnosis, enhance patient selection and generate baseline measures for clinical trials.

Demographic changes in a large motor neuron disease cohort in Portugal: a 27 year experience

Objective: Motor Neuron Diseases (MND) have a large clinical spectrum, being the most common amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) but there is significant clinical heterogeneity. Our goal was to investigate this heterogeneity and any potential changes during a long period. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study among a large Portuguese cohort of MND patients (n = 1550) and investigated changing patterns in clinical and demographic characteristics over the 27-year period of our database. With that aim, patients were divided into three 9-year groups according to the date of their first visit to our unit: P1, 1994-2002; P2, 2003-2011; P3, 2012-2020. Results: The overall cohort's clinical and demographic characteristics are consistent with clinical experience, but our findings point to gradual changes over time. Time pattern analysis revealed statistically significant differences in the distribution of clinical phenotypes, the average age of onset, diagnostic delay, the proportin of patients using respiratory support with noninvasive ventilation (NIV), time to NIV, and survival. Across time, in the overall cohort, we found an increasing age at onset (p = 0.029), a decrease of two months in diagnostic delay (p < 0.001) and a higher relative frequency of progressive muscular atrophy patients. For ALS patients with spinal onset, from P1 to P2, there was a more widespread (54.8% vs 69.4%, p = 0.005) and earlier (36.9 vs 27.2 months, p = 0.05) use of NIV and a noteworthy 13-month increase in median survival (p = 0.041). Conclusions: Our results probably reflect better comprehensive care, and they are relevant for future studies exploring the impact of new treatments on ALS patients.

Iranian clinical practice guideline for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rapidly progressive neurodegeneration involving motor neurons. The 3-5 years that patients have to live is marked by day-to-day loss of motor and sometimes cognitive abilities. Enormous amounts of healthcare services and resources are necessary to support patients and their caregivers during this relatively short but burdensome journey. Organization and management of these resources need to best meet patients' expectations and health system efficiency mandates. This can only occur in the setting of multidisciplinary ALS clinics which are known as the gold standard of ALS care worldwide. To introduce this standard to the care of Iranian ALS patients, which is an inevitable quality milestone, a national ALS clinical practice guideline is the necessary first step. The National ALS guideline will serve as the knowledge base for the development of local clinical pathways to guide patient journeys in multidisciplinary ALS clinics. To this end, we gathered a team of national neuromuscular experts as well as experts in related specialties necessary for delivering multidisciplinary care to ALS patients to develop the Iranian ALS clinical practice guideline. Clinical questions were prepared in the Patient, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) format to serve as a guide for the literature search. Considering the lack of adequate national/local studies at this time, a consensus-based approach was taken to evaluate the quality of the retrieved evidence and summarize recommendations.

Limited value of serum neurofilament light chain in diagnosing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

A biomarker specific for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis must be sensitive across a spectrum of clinical heterogeneity. Neurofilament light chain levels in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis correlate with the rate of disability progression. Previous attempts to establish a diagnostic role for neurofilament light chain have been limited to comparison with healthy individuals or controls with alternative diagnoses unlikely to be confused with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in real-world clinical practice. In a tertiary amyotrophic lateral sclerosis referral clinic, at first visit, serum was taken for neurofilament light chain measurement after prospectively recording the clinical diagnosis as 'amyotrophic lateral sclerosis', 'primary lateral sclerosis', 'alternative' or 'currently uncertain'. Of 133 referrals, 93 patients were diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (median neurofilament light chain 218.1 pg/ml, interquartile range 130.7-311.9), three primary lateral sclerosis (65.6, 51.5-106.9) and 19 alternative diagnoses (45.2, 13.5-71.9) at first visit. Of 18 initially uncertain diagnoses, eight were subsequently diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (98.5, 45.3-300.1). Neurofilament light chain ≥110.9 pg/ml had a positive predictive value of 0.92 for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; <110.9 pg/ml had a negative predictive value of 0.48. In a specialized clinic, neurofilament light chain is largely confirmatory to clinical judgement in diagnosing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and has limited ability to exclude alternative diagnoses. The current, important, value of neurofilament light chain is its potential to stratify patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis by disease activity and as a biomarker in therapeutic trials.

Trends in the diagnostic delay and pathway for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients across different countries

Background

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disease with a median survival of 2-5 years. An early diagnosis is essential for providing ALS patients the finest management possible. Studies from different countries report a similar median diagnostic delay of around 12 months, which is still far from desirable. We analyzed the diagnostic pathway in different countries in order to identify the major challenges.

Methods

We studied a cohort of 1,405 ALS patients from five different centers, in four different countries (Turkey, Germany, Poland, and Portugal), which collaborated in a common database. Demographic, disease and sociocultural factors were collected. Time from first symptom onset to first medical evaluation and to diagnosis, the specialist assessment and investigations requested were analyzed. Factors contributing to diagnostic delay were evaluated by multivariate linear regression.

Results

The median diagnostic delay from first symptom onset was 11 months and was similar between centers. Major differences were seen in the time from symptom onset to first medical evaluation. An earlier first medical evaluation was associated with a longer time to diagnosis, highlighting that ALS diagnosis is not straightforward in the early stages of the disease. The odds for ALS diagnosis were superior when evaluated by a neurologist and increased over time. Electromyography was decisive in establishing the diagnosis.

Conclusions

We suggest that a specific diagnostic test for ALS-a specific biomarker-will be needed to achieve early diagnosis. Early referral to a neurologist and to electromyography is important for early ALS diagnosis.

The future of ALS diagnosis and staging: where do we go from here?

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rare, progressive multi-system neurodegenerative disorder. Its clinical presentation varies considerably leading to delays in diagnosis, which has dire consequences in a disease where early intervention is key to optimize outcomes and limit care giver burden. There are a range of diagnostic criteria available to aid ALS diagnosis, as well staging methods to assess disease progression. However, they all suffer from inter-rater variability, complexity, and confusion in use. Such difficulties, when medical appointment times are limited and becoming more virtually based, have the potential to amplify uncertainty and errors in ALS diagnosis and prognosis. This review provides a clinical overview of the best way to balance the needs of evidence-based medicine and the patient. We focus on ALS diagnostic criteria and staging systems currently in use in clinical practice and explore factors that could enhance diagnostic efficiency and assessment of disease progression.

Progress, development, and challenges in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) brings unique challenges to a clinical trial setting, due in part to relatively low disease prevalence coupled with a poor prognosis, in addition to the complexities linked to disease heterogeneity. As critical understanding of the disease develops, particularly in relation to clinical phenotype and the mechanisms of disease progression, so too new concepts evolve in relation to clinical trials, including the advent of precision therapy, targeted to subgroups of ALS patients.

AREAS COVERED

Individualized, or precision medicine in ALS recognizes the heterogeneous nature of the disease and utilizes information such as the clinical phenotype of the disease, clinical biomarkers, and genotyping to promote a tailored approach to treatment. Separate to these considerations, the present review will discuss clinical trial design and how this can be improved to better match patient and investigator needs in ALS clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Precision therapy will promote a more focused treatment approach, with the goal of improving clinical outcomes for ALS patients. An increased community awareness of ALS, coupled with significant industry and philanthropic funding for ALS research, is accelerating this process.

Characterising ALS disease progression according to El Escorial and Gold Coast criteria

BACKGROUND

The Gold Coast criteria (GCC) have been proposed as a means of selecting patients for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) clinical trials. We aimed to characterise disease progression according to the GCC.

METHODS

Data from population-based ALS registries from the Netherlands and Belgium were analysed. The GCC additionally define ALS as lower motor neuron (LMN) dysfunction in ≥2 body regions without upper motor neuron dysfunction. Therefore, the revised El Escorial criteria (rEEC) were supplemented with a 'Gold Coast ALS' category for patients with only LMN dysfunction in ≥2 body regions. We assessed survival time, ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) progression rates and between-patient variability per diagnostic category.

RESULTS

We included 5957 ALS patients, of whom 600 (10.1%) fulfilled the GCC but not the rEEC, and 95 (1.6%) fulfilled only the rEEC. ALSFRS-R progression rates were similar for the rEEC (0.84 points/month) and GCC (0.81 points/month) with similar variability (standard deviation of 0.59 vs. 0.60) and median survival time (17.8 vs.18.7 months). Survival time and average progression rates varied (p<0.001) between categories. Per category, however, there was considerable between-patient variability with progression rates ranging from: -2.10 to -0.14 (definite), -1.94 to -0.06 (probable), -2.10 to -0.02 (probable laboratory supported), -1.79 to -0.02 (possible) and -1.31 to 0.08 (Gold Coast).

CONCLUSIONS

The GCC broaden the definition of ALS, allowing more patients to participate in trials, while minimally impacting population heterogeneity. Given the large variability per diagnostic category, selecting only specific categories for trials may not result in a more homogeneous study population.

Gold Coast criteria expand clinical trial eligibility in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Consensus criteria to formalize the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and refine clinical trial populations have evolved. The recently proposed Gold Coast consensus criteria are intended to simplify use and increase sensitivity. We aimed to evaluate the potential impact of these criteria on clinical trial eligibility.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective study of people diagnosed with ALS between 2016 and 2021 to determine the numbers of those meeting Gold Coast, revised El Escorial (rEEC) criteria, and Awaji criteria. We identified the proportion of those who would have been eligible for participation in three major ALS clinical trials if Gold Coast were used in place of rEEC definite/probable criteria. (rEEC D/P).

RESULTS

Two hundred six people with ALS were included in our study. 48.5% met Gold Coast criteria but not rEEC D/P. Using the Gold Coast criteria would result in higher rates of clinical trial eligibility after other inclusion criteria were met: 95.2% vs 42.5% (P < .001) in a phase III study of riluzole; 100% vs 31.0% (P = .002) in a phase III study of edaravone; and 95.6% vs 45.3% (P < .001) in an ongoing phase III study of sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol. The sensitivity of the Gold Coast criteria (96.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 92.2%-98.2%) was significantly higher than that of rEEC D/P (47.6%; 95% CI, 40.6%-54.6%; for difference, χ²  = 117.6; P < .001).

DISCUSSION

Until robust biomarkers are available to diagnose ALS, consensus diagnostic criteria remain necessary. Gold Coast criteria would expand research and clinical trial eligibility and improve external validity of clinical trial results.

Recent advances in the diagnosis and prognosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

The diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis can be challenging due to its heterogeneity in clinical presentation and overlap with other neurological disorders. Diagnosis early in the disease course can improve outcomes as timely interventions can slow disease progression. An evolving awareness of disease genotypes and phenotypes and new diagnostic criteria, such as the recent Gold Coast criteria, could expedite diagnosis. Improved prognosis, such as that achieved with the survival model from the European Network for the Cure of ALS, could inform the patient and their family about disease course and improve end-of-life planning. Novel staging and scoring systems can help monitor disease progression and might potentially serve as clinical trial outcomes. Lastly, new tools, such as fluid biomarkers, imaging modalities, and neuromuscular electrophysiological measurements, might increase diagnostic and prognostic accuracy.

Fasciculation intensity and limb dominance in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a muscle ultrasonographic study

Background and purpose

Muscle ultrasonography has been increasingly recognized as a useful tool for detection of fasciculations. Separately, concordance between dominant hand and onset side has been reported in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The aim of this study was to reveal the distribution of fasciculations in the whole body, focusing on handedness.

Methods

In 106 consecutive patients with ALS, muscle ultrasonography was systematically performed in 11 muscles (the tongue, and bilateral biceps brachii, 1st dorsal interosseous [FDI], T10-paraspinalis, vastus lateralis and tibialis anterior muscles). The fasciculation intensity was scored from 0 to 3 for each muscle.

Results

Fasciculations were more frequently found in the limb muscles than the tongue and paraspinalis. Side and handedness analyses revealed that fasciculation intensity in FDI was significantly more prominent on the right (median [inter-quartile range] 2 [0 - 3]) than left (1.5 [0 - 3]; p = 0.016), and in the dominant hand (2 [1 - 3]) than non-dominant side (1.5 [0 - 3]; p = 0.025). The differences were greater in patients with upper limb onset. There were no side differences in the lower limb muscles. Multivariate analyses showed that male patients had more frequent fasciculations in the dominant FDI (β = 0.22, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

More intensive fasciculations are present in the FDI in the dominant hand and gender might be associated with fasciculation intensities. This distribution pattern of fasciculations might be associated with pathogenesis of ALS.

Moderne Diagnosestellung der Amyotrophen Lateralsklerose – ein Update der Diagnosekriterien

Die Diagnose der Amyotrophen Lateralsklerose ist weiterhin eine Herausforderung. Sowohl die revidierten El-Escorial-Kriterien als auch die Awaji-Kriterien werden zum Teil in der klinischen Praxis genutzt, sind jedoch komplex und wenig sensitiv. Die neu vorgeschlagenen Gold-Coast-Kriterien stellen eine Erleichterung im klinischen Alltag dar. Eine Veranschaulichung der Diagnosefindung nach den verschiedenen Kriterien findet sich in dem Fallbeispiel.

What Is in the Literature

This issue of What Is in the Literature focuses on articles on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis over the past year. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis remains a challenging disorder with progression to death. Within the past year, a phase 2 trial of a drug combination showed slowing in the rate of progression. While awaiting a phase 3 trial or approval by the Food and Drug Administration, selected articles that aid the diagnosis, contribute to care, or add to general knowledge about the disease are reviewed.