Comparative Effectiveness of Vancomycin Versus Daptomycin for MRSA Bacteremia With Vancomycin MIC >1 mg/L: A Multicenter Evaluation

Clinical outcome of combination of vancomycin and ceftaroline versus vancomycin monotherapy for treatment of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection

BACKGROUND

The role of combination therapies for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections is widely debated.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included adults with MRSA bacteraemia treated between January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2022. Patients receiving combination therapy with vancomycin and ceftaroline were matched in a 2:1 ratio with those on vancomycin monotherapy based on bacteraemia source and illness severity. The primary outcome was frequency of bacteraemia recurrence. Secondary outcomes were all cause 30/90-day mortality, recurrence or mortality at 30/90 days and in hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

Of 57 patients included, 37 (65%) were in the combination group. The overall intensive care unit admission rate was 63.2% (36/57) and the Pitt Bacteraemia Score was 1 [0-4] at the time of diagnosis. The most common source of infection was endovascular/endocarditis (n = 36, 63.2%). Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the monotherapy and combination group of patients, except for higher body mass index (32.5 [25.5-36.4] vs. 24.4 [20.9-29], p = 0.004) and a greater immunosuppression prevalence (3 (15%) vs. 0 (0%), p = 0.039) in monotherapy group. There was no significant difference in bacteraemia recurrence (3 (15%) vs. 4 (10.8%), p = 0.7) or all-cause 30-day mortality (3 (15%) vs. 4 (10.8%), p = 0.7) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study are limited by a retrospective observational design; however, combination of vancomycin and ceftaroline for MRSA bacteraemia was not associated with lower bacteraemia recurrence or mortality compared to vancomycin monotherapy.

Is It Still Beneficial to Monitor the Trough Concentration of Vancomycin? A Quantitative Meta-Analysis of Nephrotoxicity and Efficacy

This study conducted a quantitative meta-analysis to investigate the association of vancomycin indicators, particularly area under the curve over 24 h (AUC24) and trough concentrations (Ctrough), and their relationship with both nephrotoxicity and efficacy. Literature research was performed in PubMed and Web of Science on vancomycin nephrotoxicity and efficacy in adult inpatients. Vancomycin Ctrough, AUC24, AUC24/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), nephrotoxicity evaluation and treatment outcomes were extracted. Logistic regression and Emax models were conducted, stratified by evaluation criterion for nephrotoxicity and primary outcomes for efficacy. Among 100 publications on nephrotoxicity, 29 focused on AUC24 and 97 on Ctrough, while of 74 publications on efficacy, 27 reported AUC24/MIC and 68 reported Ctrough. The logistic regression analysis indicated a significant association between nephrotoxicity and vancomycin Ctrough (odds ratio = 2.193; 95% CI 1.582-3.442, p < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve had an area of 0.90, with a cut-off point of 14.55 mg/L. Additionally, 92.3% of the groups with a mean AUC24 within 400-600 mg·h/L showed a mean Ctrough of 10-20 mg/L. However, a subtle, non-statistically significant association was observed between the AUC24 and nephrotoxicity, as well as between AUC24/MIC and Ctrough concerning treatment outcomes. Our findings suggest that monitoring vancomycin Ctrough remains a beneficial and valuable approach to proactively identifying patients at risk of nephrotoxicity, particularly when Ctrough exceeds 15 mg/L. Ctrough can serve as a surrogate for AUC24 to some extent. However, no definitive cut-off values were identified for AUC24 concerning nephrotoxicity or for Ctrough and AUC24/MIC regarding efficacy.

Phage-antibiotic synergy against daptomycin-nonsusceptible MRSA in an ex vivo simulated endocardial pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model

Phage-antibiotic combinations (PAC) offer a potential solution for treating refractory daptomycin-nonsusceptible (DNS) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. We examined PAC activity against two well-characterized DNS MRSA strains (C4 and C37) in vitro and ex vivo. PACs comprising daptomycin (DAP) ± ceftaroline (CPT) and a two-phage cocktail (Intesti13 + Sb-1) were evaluated for phage-antibiotic synergy (PAS) against high MRSA inoculum (109 CFU/mL) using (i) modified checkerboards (CB), (ii) 24-h time-kill assays (TKA), and (iii) 168-h ex vivo simulated endocardial vegetation (SEV) models. PAS was defined as a fractional inhibitory concentration ≤0.5 in CB minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) or a ≥2 log10 CFU/mL reduction compared to the next best regimen in time-kill assays and SEV models. Significant differences between regimens were assessed by analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc modification (α = 0.05). CB assays revealed PAS with Intesti13 + Sb-1 + DAP ± CPT. In 24-h time-kill assays against C4, Intesti13 + Sb-1 + DAP ± CPT demonstrated synergistic activity (-Δ7.21 and -Δ7.39 log10 CFU/mL, respectively) (P < 0.05 each). Against C37, Intesti13 + Sb-1 + CPT ± DAP was equally effective (-Δ7.14 log10 CFU/mL each) and not significantly different from DAP + Intesti13 + Sb-1 (-Δ6.65 log10 CFU/mL). In 168-h SEV models against C4 and C37, DAP ± CPT + the phage cocktail exerted synergistic activities, significantly reducing bio-burdens to the detection limit [2 log10 CFU/g (-Δ7.07 and -Δ7.11 log10 CFU/g, respectively)] (P < 0.001). At 168 h, both models maintained stable MICs, and no treatment-emergent phage resistance occurred with DAP or DAP + CPT regimens. The two-phage cocktail demonstrated synergistic activity against two DNS MRSA isolates in combination with DAP + CPT in vitro and ex vivo. Further in vivo PAC investigations are needed.

Comparison of daptomycin and glycopeptide efficacy and safety for the treatment of Gram-positive infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The indications of daptomycin have been extended to off-label indications including prosthesis-related infection, and bone and joint infection (BJI). However, efficacy and safety have not been thoroughly demonstrated compared with the standard of care. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the treatment effect of daptomycin and glycopeptides for complicated infections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing daptomycin and standard of care for Gram-positive infections, published until 30 June 2021. The primary outcome was defined as all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were clinical and microbiological success. The main safety outcome was any severe adverse event (SAE) (grade  ≥3).

RESULTS

Overall, eight RCTs were included in the meta-analysis, totalling 1095 patients. Six (75%) were in complicated skin and soft-structure infections, one (12.5%) in bacteraemia and one (12.5%) in a BJI setting. Six RCTs used vancomycin as a comparator and two used either vancomycin or teicoplanin. All-cause mortality and clinical cure were not different between groups. The microbiological cure rate was superior in patients who received daptomycin [risk ratio (RR) = 1.17 (95% CI: 1.01-1.35)]. The risk of SAEs [RR = 0.57 (95% CI: 0.36-0.90)] was lower in the daptomycin arm.

CONCLUSIONS

While daptomycin is associated with a significantly lower risk of SAEs and a better microbiological eradication, substantial uncertainty remains about the best treatment strategy in the absence of good-quality evidence, especially in bacteraemia and endocarditis where further RCTs should be conducted.

Comparative effectiveness of daptomycin versus vancomycin among patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSIs), vancomycin stands as the prevalent therapeutic agent. Daptomycin remains an alternative antibiotic to treat MRSA BSIs in cases where vancomycin proves ineffective. However, studies have conflicted on whether daptomycin is more effective than vancomycin among patients with MRSA BSI.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of daptomycin and vancomycin for the prevention of mortality among adult patients with MRSA BSI.

METHODS

Systematic searches of databases were performed, including Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) and Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) were used to assess the quality of individual observational and randomized control studies, respectively. Pooled odd ratios were calculated using random effects models.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included based on a priori set inclusion and exclusion criteria. Daptomycin treatment was associated with non-significant lower mortality odds, compared to vancomycin treatment (OR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.62, 1.06). Sub-analyses based on the time patients were switched from another anti-MRSA treatment to daptomycin demonstrated that switching to daptomycin within 3 or 5 days was significantly associated with 55% and 45% decreased odds of all-cause mortality, respectively. However, switching to daptomycin any time after five days of treatment was not significantly associated with lower odds of mortality. Stratified analysis based on vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) revealed that daptomycin treatment among patients infected with MRSA strains with MIC≥1 mg/L was significantly associated with 40% lower odds of mortality compared to vancomycin treatment.

CONCLUSION

Compared with vancomycin, an early switch from vancomycin to daptomycin was significantly associated with lower odds of mortality. In contrast, switching to daptomycin at any time only showed a trend towards reduced mortality, with a non-significant association. Therefore, the efficacy of early daptomycin use over vancomycin against mortality among MRSA BSIs patients may add evidence to the existing literature in support of switching to daptomycin early over remaining on vancomycin. More randomized and prospective studies are needed to assess this association.

Significant Publications on Infectious Diseases Pharmacotherapy in 2021

Purpose: To summarize the most noteworthy infectious diseases (ID) pharmacotherapy articles published in peer-reviewed literature in 2021. Summary: Members of the Houston Infectious Diseases Network (HIDN) nominated articles that were deemed to have significant contributions to ID pharmacotherapy in 2021. These nominations included articles pertaining to both general ID, including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) pharmacotherapy. A total of 35 articles were nominated by HIDN: 30 articles pertaining to general ID pharmacotherapy and 5 articles with HIV/AIDS focus. To select the most influential articles of 2021, a survey was created and distributed to members of the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP). Of the 239 SIDP members who responded to the survey, there were 192 recorded votes for the top 10 general ID pharmacotherapy articles and 47 recorded votes for the top HIV/AIDS article, respectively. The top publications are summarized. Conclusion: Antimicrobial stewardship and the optimal management of infectious disease states continues to be a priority in the midst of the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic. In light of the sheer volume of ID-related articles published in the past year, this review aims to aid clinicians in remaining up-to-date on key practice-changing ID pharmacotherapy publications from 2021.

Efficacy and safety of vancomycin for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vancomycin with the other anti-Gram-positive bacteria antibiotics in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases until August 2022 for studies that compared vancomycin with other antibiotic regimens for treating Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Clinical and microbiological responses, adverse events, relapse rate and mortality were considered.

RESULTS

Fifteen randomized controlled trials and nine retrospective studies were included. The efficacy and safety data of vancomycin differed from those of the comparators group. After subgroup analysis, the differences came mainly from the trials compared with daptomycin. Compared to daptomycin, vancomycin showed a lower microbiological cure rate (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.41∼0.82, I2 = 0%, P = 0.002) and clinical cure rate (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.42∼0.68, I2 = 3%, P < 0.00001), as well as more adverse events (OR = 3.21, 95% CI = 1.43∼7.19, I2 = 59%, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of vancomycin in treating Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia is still excellent but slightly inferior in adverse events. However, this does not affect its use as a first-line drug. Daptomycin is expected to be a better antimicrobial drug.

Growth Arrest of Staphylococcus aureus Induces Daptomycin Tolerance via Cell Wall Remodelling

Almost all bactericidal drugs require bacterial replication and/or metabolic activity for their killing activity. When these processes are inhibited by bacteriostatic antibiotics, bacterial killing is significantly reduced. One notable exception is the lipopeptide antibiotic daptomycin, which has been reported to efficiently kill growth-arrested bacteria. However, these studies employed only short periods of growth arrest (<1 h), which may not fully represent the duration of growth arrest that can occur in vivo. We found that a growth inhibitory concentration of the protein synthesis inhibitor tetracycline led to a time-dependent induction of daptomycin tolerance in S. aureus, with an approximately 100,000-fold increase in survival after 16 h of growth arrest, relative to exponential-phase bacteria. Daptomycin tolerance required glucose and was associated with increased production of the cell wall polymers peptidoglycan and wall-teichoic acids. However, while the accumulation of peptidoglycan was required for daptomycin tolerance, only a low abundance of wall teichoic acid was necessary. Therefore, whereas tolerance to most antibiotics occurs passively due to a lack of metabolic activity and/or replication, daptomycin tolerance arises via active cell wall remodelling. IMPORTANCE Understanding why antibiotics sometimes fail to cure infections is fundamental to improving treatment outcomes. This is a major challenge when it comes to Staphylococcus aureus because this pathogen causes several different chronic or recurrent infections. Previous work has shown that a lack of replication, as often occurs during infection, makes bacteria tolerant of most bactericidal antibiotics. However, one antibiotic that has been reported to kill nonreplicating bacteria is daptomycin. In this work, we show that the growth arrest of S. aureus does in fact lead to daptomycin tolerance, but it requires time, nutrients, and biosynthetic pathways, making it distinct from other types of antibiotic tolerance that occur in nonreplicating bacteria.

Antimicrobial potency, prevention ability, and killing efficacy of daptomycin-loaded versus vancomycin-loaded β-tricalcium phosphate/calcium sulfate for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms

Growing evidence has shown that the efficacy of systemic administration of daptomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-related infections is satisfactory. However, the clinical efficacy of the local administration of daptomycin for the management of osteoarticular infections remains unclear. This in vitro study compared the efficacy of daptomycin and vancomycin against MRSA biofilms. The elution kinetics of daptomycin and vancomycin, combined with gentamicin and loaded with either β-tricalcium phosphate/calcium sulfate or calcium sulfate, in the presence of MRSA infection, was assessed. Their efficacy in preventing biofilm formation and killing pre-formed biofilms was assessed using colony-forming unit count and confocal laser scanning microscopy. In addition, the efficacy of daptomycin, vancomycin, and gentamicin in prophylaxis and eradication of MRSA biofilms was also evaluated. Daptomycin + gentamicin and vancomycin + gentamicin displayed similar antimicrobial potency against MRSA, by either β-tricalcium phosphate/calcium sulfate or calcium sulfate. In the prevention assays, both daptomycin + gentamicin and vancomycin + gentamicin showed similar efficacy in preventing bacterial colony formation, with approximately 6 logs lower colony-forming units than those in the control group at both 1 and 3  days. The killing effect on pre-formed biofilms showed significant decreases of approximately 4 logs at 1 and 3  days following treatment with daptomycin + gentamicin and vancomycin + gentamicin. In addition, the confocal laser scanning microscopy results support the colony-forming unit data. Moreover, single use of vancomycin and gentamicin showed similar efficacies in preventing and killing MRSA biofilms, both of which were better than that of gentamicin. Our study demonstrated that vancomycin + gentamicin and daptomycin + gentamicin loaded with β-tricalcium phosphate/calcium sulfate or calcium sulfate showed similar prophylactic and killing effects on MRSA biofilms, implying a potential indication of local administration daptomycin for the treatment of MRSA-associated osteoarticular infections, especially if vancomycin administration presents limitations.

Epidemiology and antibiotic resistance of prosthetic joint infections according to time of occurrence, a 10-year study

OBJECTIVES

To describe the microorganisms responsible for prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and their antimicrobial susceptibilities, and to propose appropriate empirical antimicrobial treatments (EATs) according to time of occurrence METHODS: : This 10-year retrospective study presents the bacterial etiology of 282 consecutive PJIs in a French hospital according to time of occurrence (adapted from Zimmerli's classification: early, <3 months; delayed, 3-12 months; late acute, >12 months with hematogenous seeding or contiguous spread; late chronic, >12 months without hematogenous seeding). The expected efficacy of various EATs was analyzed for each PJI.

RESULTS

Staphylococci were the most commonly found bacteria (S. aureus (44.3%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (25.2%) with 15.2% and 49.3% methicillin resistance respectively), followed by Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) (17.7%) and streptococci (14.9%). The distribution of species varied between categories, but antibiotics targeting GNBs were required in all categories. Imipenem-vancomycin was the most effective combination (99.3%) but should be reserved for patients with suspected resistant GNB. Cefotaxime-vancomycin was less effective in early/delayed and late PJIs (91.1% and 86.1% respectively), due to resistant GNB and polymicrobial infections. Piperacillin/tazobactam-vancomycin appeared to be appropriate in all situations (>96% efficacy).

CONCLUSION

Proposing universal recommendations remains challenging, but a good understanding of the local epidemiology is important for optimizing EATs.

Infective Endocarditis in the Elderly: Challenges and Strategies

The specific management of infective endocarditis (IE) in elderly patients is not specifically addressed in recent guidelines despite its increasing incidence and high mortality in this population. The term "elderly" corresponds to different ages in the literature, but it is defined by considerable comorbidity and heterogeneity. Cancer incidence, specifically colorectal cancer, is increased in older patients with IE and impacts its outcome. Diagnosis of IE in elderly patients is challenging due to the atypical presentation of the disease and the lower performance of imaging studies. Enterococcal etiology is more frequent than in younger patients. Antibiotic treatment should prioritize diminishing adverse effects and drug interactions while maintaining the best efficacy, as surgical treatment is less commonly performed in this population due to the high surgical risk. The global assessment of elderly patients with IE, with particular attention to frailty and geriatric profiles, should be performed by multidisciplinary teams to improve disease management in this population.

A Retrospective Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of Vancomycin versus Daptomycin in Hemodialysis Patients

Vancomycin or daptomycin is administered to hemodialysis patients infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus and Enterococcus species. Although serious concerns regarding nephrotoxicity due to vancomycin have been raised, it might not be a critical issue in hemodialysis patients. Moreover, very few studies have investigated the effectiveness of vancomycin versus daptomycin in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Hence, we retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness and safety of vancomycin and daptomycin in patients undergoing hemodialysis. We investigated the following measures: mortality, clinical and microbiological effectiveness, and incidence of adverse events in hemodialysis patients who received vancomycin or daptomycin from 2014 to 2019. Moreover, we evaluated the covariates related to 30-day mortality. We found that 73 patients received vancomycin, while 34 received daptomycin for the treatment of infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci, and Enterococcus faecium. Mortality after vancomycin treatment was significantly lower than daptomycin treatment (4.1% vs. 26.5%, p < 0.01). The clinical and microbiological effectiveness as well as the safety were not significantly different between the two treatments. Although daptomycin treatment with a loading dose was associated with lower mortality, the mortality of the treatment (8.3%) did not differ significantly compared to that of the vancomycin treatment (4.1%). Therefore, our findings suggest that vancomycin remains the first-line treatment for hemodialysis patients; however, a loading dose may be beneficial for patients receiving daptomycin.

Improved Neurological Outcome in a Patient With Complicated Mitral Valve Endocarditis Treated With Daptomycin-Rifampin Regimen

Complicated infective endocarditis (IE) with symptomatic neurological involvement is associated with a poor prognosis. Vancomycin is the first-line antibiotic employed for the treatment of IE as general resistance of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) to vancomycin is low and the antibiotic is well tolerated. In this case report, we describe a case of severely complicated MRSA endocarditis initially treated unsuccessfully with vancomycin. Our patient presented with severe encephalopathy with multiple septic infarctions noted on imaging. After treatment with a daptomycin-rifampin regimen, significant clinical improvement was noted. Based on the findings of this case report, what remains to be analyzed further with future studies is whether the daptomycin-rifampin regimen effect is independent of initial vancomycin-based treatment as most cases of IE are first treated with vancomycin and are only transitioned into daptomycin-rifampin regimen after treatment failure or persistent positive blood cultures, as is described in this case.

Efficacy and Safety of Daptomycin versus Vancomycin for Bacteremia Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus with Vancomycin Minimum Inhibitory Concentration > 1 µg/mL: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the efficacy of daptomycin and vancomycin in adult patients with bacteremia by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) > 1 µg/mL. We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases on 12 May 2020. All-cause mortality (primary outcome) and treatment success rates were compared and subgroups stratified by infection source risk level and method of vancomycin susceptibility testing were also analyzed. Seven studies (n = 907 patients) were included in this efficacy analysis. Compared with vancomycin, daptomycin treatment was associated with significantly lower mortality (six studies, odds ratio (OR) 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29−0.98) and higher treatment success (six studies, OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.63−2.96), which was consistent regardless of the vancomycin MIC test method used. For intermediate-risk sources, daptomycin was a factor increasing treatment success compared with vancomycin (OR 4.40, 95% CI 2.06−9.40), and it exhibited a trend toward a higher treatment success rate for high-risk sources. In conclusion, daptomycin should be considered for the treatment of bacteremia caused by MRSA with vancomycin MIC > 1 µg/mL, especially in patients with intermediate- and high-risk bacteremia sources.

Automated Susceptibility Testing With Vitek 2 Compared to MicroScan Reduces Vancomycin Alternative Therapy For Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia

OBJECTIVES

Variability in minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) with automated susceptibility testing instruments may influence methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference in vancomycin MIC values and the impact on vancomycin alternative therapy for MRSA bacteremia using the MicroScan and VITEK 2 automated systems.

METHODS

This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study of adult patients with MRSA bacteremia. Patients were stratified by susceptibility testing with MicroScan (May 2013-December 2016) or VITEK 2 (June 2017-February 2020). The primary outcome was vancomycin alternative therapy use. Secondary endpoints included MRSA MIC, 30-day mortality, 30- and 90-day readmission, and hospital length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

A total of 193 patients were included for analysis: 89 in the MicroScan group and 104 in the VITEK 2 group. Vancomycin alternative therapy use was higher in the MicroScan group than the VITEK 2 group (56.2% vs 20.2%; p <0.001). Median MIC value was 2 mg/L and 1 mg/L for MicroScan and VITEK 2, respectively (p <0.001). Median hospital LOS was shorter in the VITEK 2 period (16 vs 12 days; p = 0.02). Thirty-day mortality (10.1% vs 7.7%; p = 0.555) and 90-day readmission (34.8% vs 29.8%; p = 0.457) did not significantly differ between MicroScan and VITEK 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

VITEK 2 use was associated with lower reported vancomycin MICs and less use of vancomycin alternative therapy.

Nemonoxacin enhances antibacterial activity and anti-resistant mutation ability of vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro dynamic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model

Reduced susceptibility and emergence of resistance to vancomycin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have led to the development of various vancomycin based combinations. Nemonoxacin is a novel nonfluorinated quinolone with antibacterial activity against MRSA. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of nemonoxacin on antibacterial activity and the anti-resistant mutation ability of vancomycin for MRSA and explore whether quinolone resistance genes are associated with a reduction in the vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and mutant prevention concentration (MPC) when combined with nemonoxacin. Four isolates, all with a vancomycin MIC of 2 μg/mL, were used in a modified in vitro dynamic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to investigate the effects of nemonoxacin on antibacterial activity (M04, M23 and M24) and anti-resistant mutation ability (M04, M23 and M25, all with MPC ≥19.2 μg/mL) of vancomycin. The mutation sites of gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE of 55 clinical MRSA isolates were sequenced. We observed that in M04 and M23, the combination of vancomycin (1g q12h) and nemonoxacin (0.5g qd) showed a synergistic bactericidal activity and resistance enrichment suppression. All clinical isolates resistant to nemonoxacin harbored gyrA (S84→L) mutation; gyrA (S84→L) and parC (E84→K) mutations were the two independent risk factors for the unchanged vancomycin MPC in combination. Nemonoxacin enhances the bactericidal activity and suppresses resistance enrichment ability of vancomycin against MRSA with a MIC of 2 μg/mL. Our in vitro data support the combination of nemonoxacin and vancomycin for the treatment of MRSA infection with a high MIC.

Treatment of MRSA infections in India: Clinical insights from a Delphi analysis

PURPOSE

International and Indian guidelines for the management of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are available, but the local guidelines are not MRSA-specific. This study aimed to provide clinical insights for the treatment of MRSA infections in India.

METHODS

We used a three-step modified Delphi method to obtain insights. Ten experts comprising infectious disease specialists, microbiologists, pulmonologists, and critical care experts agreed to participate in the analysis. In round 1, a total of 161 statements were circulated to the panel and the experts were asked to 'agree' or 'disagree' by responding 'yes' or 'no' to each statement and provide comments. The same process was used for 73 statements in round 2. Direct interaction with the experts was carried out in round 3 wherein 35 statements were discussed. At least 80% of the experts had to agree for a statement to reach concordance.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight statements in round 1, thirty-eight statements in round 2, and eight statements in round 3 reached concordance and were accepted without modification. The final document comprised 152 statements on the management of various syndromes associated with MRSA such as skin and soft tissue infections, bacteremia and endocarditis, pneumonia, bone and joint infections, and central nervous system infections.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis will assist clinicians in India to choose an appropriate course of action for MRSA infections.

Exploratory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections: Is Linezolid or Daptomycin Favored Over Vancomycin?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (MRSAB) cause significant mortality, and often require extended antibiotic therapy. Vancomycin, the most common initial MRSAB treatment, carries significant monitoring burden and nephrotoxicity risks. Our objective was to compare the cost-effectiveness of vancomycin and other antibiotic regimens against MRSAB.

METHODS

We estimated the cost-effectiveness of intravenous antibiotics (vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid, ceftaroline/daptomycin) for Veterans Health Administration patients with MRSAB using an exploratory decision-tree model. Primary effectiveness outcome was composite of microbiological failure at 7 days and adverse drug event (ADE)-related discontinuation after at least 7 days.

RESULTS

In base-case analyses, intravenous linezolid was the least expensive regimen at 4 and 6 weeks. Daptomycin was more expensive and more effective than linezolid, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of ~$13,000 (4 weeks) per composite failure avoided. With 6 weeks of treatment, daptomycin was more expensive and more effective than vancomycin (ICER ~$21,000 per composite failure avoided). Vancomycin and ceftaroline/daptomycin were dominated strategies at both 4 and 6 weeks. In one-way sensitivity analyses, vancomycin was favored when its microbiological failure risk was less than 20.1% (base-case: 27.2%), assuming a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $40,000/composite treatment failure avoided. In two-way sensitivity analyses, intravenous linezolid was favored if linezolid microbiological failure and ADE-related discontinuation rates were < 22.5% and < 17.3%, respectively. Daptomycin, vancomycin, and linezolid were favored in 50%, 31%, and 17% of 4-week probabilistic iterations, respectively, at $40,000 WTP.

CONCLUSION

Daptomycin is likely less expensive and more effective than vancomycin or other initial regimens for MRSAB. More data are needed on the safety of linezolid against MRSAB.

Vancomycin or Daptomycin for Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy: Does It Make a Difference in Patient Satisfaction?

A 5-question telephone survey was administered to compare satisfaction between patients receiving vancomycin vs daptomycin outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). Twenty-seven patients completed the survey (40%). Vancomycin had higher daily interference score than daptomycin (P = .03). All patients receiving daptomycin reported a satisfaction score ≥8/10, as compared to 67% of patients who received vancomycin (P < .03). OPAT antibiotics with less cumbersome administration regimens may translate into higher patient satisfaction and quicker return to life normalcy.

Daptomycin versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection with or without Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important cause of invasive infections, mainly bloodstream infections (BSI) with or without endocarditis. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare vancomycin, the mainstay treatment, with daptomycin as therapeutic options in this context. Materials: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Database were searched from their inception to 15 February 2020. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included clinical failure, infection recurrence, persistence of infection, length-of-stay, antibiotic discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and 30-day re-admission. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020169413. Results: Eight studies (1226 patients, 554 vs. 672 in daptomycin vs. vancomycin, respectively) were included. No significant difference in terms of overall mortality was observed [odds ratio (OR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40–1.33, I² = 67%]. Daptomycin was associated with a significantly reduced risk of clinical failure (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38–0.89, I² = 60%), as confirmed by pooling adjusted effect sizes (adjusted OR against the use of vancomycin 1.94, 95%CI 1.33–1.82, I² = 41%), and was linked with fewer treatment-limiting AEs (OR 0.15, 95%CI 0.06–0.36, I² = 19%). No difference emerged between the two treatments as secondary outcomes. Results were not robust to unmeasured confounding (E-value lower than 95% CI 1.00 for all-cause mortality). Conclusions: Against MRSA BSI, with or without endocarditis, daptomycin seems to be associated with a lower risk of clinical failure and treatment-limiting AEs compared with vancomycin. Further studies are needed to better characterize the differences between the two drugs.

Cell Membrane Adaptations Mediate β-Lactam-Induced Resensitization of Daptomycin-Resistant (DAP-R) Staphylococcus aureus In Vitro

The reversal of daptomycin resistance in MRSA to a daptomycin-susceptible phenotype following prolonged passage in selected β-lactams occurs coincident with the accumulation of multiple point mutations in the mprF gene. MprF regulates surface charge by modulating the content and translocation of the positively charged cell membrane phospholipid, lysyl-phosphatidylglycerol (LPG). The precise cell membrane adaptations accompanying such β-lactam-induced mprF perturbations are unknown. This study examined key cell membrane metrics relevant to antimicrobial resistance among three daptomycin-resistant MRSA clinical strains, which became daptomycin-susceptible following prolonged exposure to cloxacillin ('daptomycin-resensitized'). The causal role of such secondary mprF mutations in mediating daptomycin resensitization was confirmed through allelic exchange strategies. The daptomycin-resensitized strains derived either post-cloxacillin passage or via allelic exchange (vs. their respective daptomycin-resistant strains) showed the following cell membrane changes: (i) enhanced BODIPY-DAP binding; (ii) significant reductions in LPG content, accompanied by significant increases in phosphatidylglycerol content (p < 0.05); (iii) no significant changes in positive cell surface charge; (iv) decreased cell membrane fluidity (p < 0.05); (v) enhanced carotenoid content (p < 0.05); and (vi) lower branched chain fatty acid profiles (antiso- vs. iso-), resulting in increases in saturated fatty acid composition (p < 0.05). Overall, the cell membrane characteristics of the daptomycin-resensitized strains resembled those of parental daptomycin-susceptible strains. Daptomycin resensitization with selected β-lactams results in both definable genetic changes (i.e., mprF mutations) and a number of key cell membrane phenotype modifications, which likely facilitate daptomycin activity.

Comparative Effectiveness of Switching to Daptomycin Versus Remaining on Vancomycin Among Patients With Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Bloodstream Infections

BACKGROUND

Patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (MRSA BSI) usually receive initial treatment with vancomycin but may be switched to daptomycin for definitive therapy, especially if treatment failure is suspected. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of switching from vancomycin to daptomycin compared with remaining on vancomycin among patients with MRSA BSI.

METHODS

Patients admitted to 124 Veterans Affairs Hospitals who experienced MRSA BSI and were treated with vancomycin during 2007-2014 were included. The association between switching to daptomycin and 30-day mortality was assessed using Cox regression models. Separate models were created for switching to daptomycin any time during the first hospitalization and for switching within 3 days of receiving vancomycin.

RESULTS

In total, 7411 patients received vancomycin for MRSA BSI. Also, 606 (8.2%) patients switched from vancomycin to daptomycin during the first hospitalization, and 108 (1.5%) switched from vancomycin to daptomycin within 3 days of starting vancomycin. In the multivariable analysis, switching to daptomycin within 3 days was significantly associated with lower 30-day mortality (hazards ratio [HR] = 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: .25, .92). However, switching to daptomycin at any time during the first hospitalization was not significantly associated with 30-day mortality (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: .69, 1.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Switching to daptomycin within 3 days of initial receipt of vancomycin is associated with lower 30-day mortality among patients with MRSA BSI. This benefit was not seen when the switch occurred later. Future studies should prospectively assess the benefit of early switching from vancomycin to other anti-MRSA antibiotics.

Daptomycin Plus β-Lactam Combination Therapy for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective, Comparative Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Mounting evidence suggests the addition of a β-lactam (BL) to daptomycin (DAP) results in synergistic in vitro activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and bolsters the innate immune response to infection. This study's objective was to provide clinical translation to these experimental data and determine if DAP+BL combination therapy results in improved clinical outcomes compared with treatment with DAP alone in patients with MRSA bloodstream infections (BSIs).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, comparative cohort study conducted at 2 academic medical centers between 2008 and 2018. Adults with MRSA BSI treated with DAP for ≥72 hours and initiated ≤5 days of culture collection were included. Patients who received a BL for ≥24 hours and initiated ≤24 hours of DAP comprised the DAP+BL group. The primary outcome was composite clinical failure (60-day all-cause mortality and/or 60-day recurrence). Analyses were adjusted for confounding using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

RESULTS

A total of 229 patients were included (72 DAP+BL and 157 DAP). In unadjusted and IPTW-adjusted analyses, DAP+BL was associated with significantly reduced odds of clinical failure (odds ratio [OR], 0.362; 95% confidence interval [CI], .164-.801; adjusted OR, 0.386; 95% CI, .175-.853). Adjusted analyses restricted to prespecified subgroups based on infection complexity and baseline health status were consistent with the main analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of a BL to DAP was associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with MRSA BSI. This study provides support to ongoing and future studies evaluating the impact of combination therapy for invasive MRSA infections.Patients treated with daptomycin plus a β-lactam for MRSA bloodstream infection had lower odds of composite clinical failure defined as 60-day all-cause mortality and/or 60-day recurrence compared with patients treated with daptomycin monotherapy after adjusting for confounding variables using inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Ceftobiprole Perspective: Current and Potential Future Indications

Ceftobiprole combines an excellent spectrum for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) pathogens, with a low/medium MDR risk, and the β-lactams' safety in frail patients admitted to the hospital in internal medicine wards which may be at high risk of adverse events by anti-MRSA coverage as oxazolidinones or glycopeptides. We aimed to report the available evidence regarding ceftobiprole use in pneumonia and invasive bacterial infections, shedding light on ceftobiprole stewardship. The clinical application and real-life experiences of using ceftobiprole for bloodstream infections, including infective endocarditis, are limited but nevertheless promising. In addition, extended-spectrum ceftobiprole activity, including Enterococcus faecalis, Enterobacteriaceae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, has theoretical advantages for use as empirical therapy in bacteremia potentially caused by a broad spectrum of microorganisms, such as catheter-related bacteremia. In the future, the desirable approach to sepsis and severe infections will be administered to patients according to their clinical situation, the intrinsic host characteristics, the susceptibility profile, and local epidemiology, while the "universal antibiotic strategy" will no longer be adequate.

High-Dose Daptomycin and Clinical Applications

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate evidence for high-dose daptomycin (doses ≥ 8 mg/kg/d).

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed/MEDLINE literature search was performed (January 2000 to December 2020) using the search terms daptomycin, high dose, and dosing. Review article references and society guidelines were reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Clinical trials, observational studies, retrospective studies, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews reporting on high-dose daptomycin were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Experimentally, daptomycin outperforms other antimicrobials for high inoculum and biofilm-associated infections. Clinically, high-dose daptomycin is supported as salvage and first-line therapy for endocarditis and bacteremia, primarily when caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (when vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration is >1 mg/L) and Enterococcus. High-dose daptomycin appears effective for osteomyelitis and central nervous system infections, although comparative studies are lacking. High dosing in renal replacement therapy requires considering clearance modality to achieve exposures like normal renal function. Weight-based dosing in obesity draws concern for elevated exposures, although high doses have not been evaluated kinetically in obesity. Some data show benefits of high doses in overweight populations. Burn patients clear daptomycin more rapidly, and high doses may only achieve drug exposures similar to standard doses (6 mg/kg).

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review analyzes the efficacy and safety of high-dose daptomycin in serious gram-positive infections. Discussion of specific infectious etiologies and patient populations should encourage clinicians to evaluate their daptomycin dosing standards.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of high-dose daptomycin and limited safety concerns encourage clinicians to consider high-dose daptomycin more liberally in severe gram-positive infections.

Using an Ordinal Approach to Compare Outcomes Between Vancomycin Versus Ceftaroline or Daptomycin in MRSA Bloodstream Infection

Introduction

Vancomycin remains first-line therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) blood stream infections (BSI); however, its toxicity and reported clinical failures are well established. Binary efficacy endpoints evaluating alternative anti-MRSA therapies leave clinicians deciphering between segregated clinical and safety outcomes and do not provide a comprehensive patient-centered picture of comparative therapies. This study aimed to apply a novel methodology, desirability of outcomes ranking (DOOR), to compare anti-MRSA therapies.

Methods

This was a single-centered, retrospective, cohort of adult patients with MRSA BSI that received vancomycin, daptomycin, or ceftaroline. A previously developed DOOR for S. aureus BSI was adjusted and applied to this cohort to compare vancomycin-treated versus daptomycin/ceftaroline-treated patients. The DOOR had five mutually exclusive ranks: (1) alive without treatment failure, infectious complications, or grade 4 adverse events (AEs); (2) alive with any one of treatment failure, infectious complications, or grade 4 AE; (3) alive with two of treatment failure, infectious complications, or grade 4 AE; (4) alive with all three treatment failure, infectious complications, or grade 4 AE; or (5) deceased.

Results

A total of 43 vancomycin-treated and 13 daptomycin/ceftaroline-treated patients were included. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar, except for higher median serum creatinine in the daptomycin/ceftaroline cohort (0.76 [IQR 0.57, 1.11] vs 1.36 [IQR 1.09, 1.91] mg/dL, P = 0.03). Patients in the daptomycin/ceftaroline cohort had a 92% probability of better outcome using DOOR methodology. Patients treated with daptomycin/ceftaroline experienced less MRSA BSI persistence (0% vs 13.9%), MRSA BSI recurrence (7.8% vs 25.6%), grade 4 AEs (23.1% vs 46.5%), and in-hospital mortality (0% vs 9.3%).

Conclusions

Although limited by sample size, this study demonstrates the potential of DOOR to produce valuable, patient-centered results. Clinicians are encouraged to become familiar with appropriate use and interpretation of DOOR methodology as it will become an increasingly common endpoint in clinical trials.

Association between high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration and clinical outcomes in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the relationship between high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC), in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSAB), and both mortality and complicated bacteremia.

METHODS

Embase, Medline, EBM, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for studies published from January 1st 2014 to February 29th 2020. "High" vancomycin MIC cut off was defined as ≥ 1.5 mg/L. Three referees independently reviewed studies that compared outcomes in patients with MRSAB stratified by vancomycin MIC. Subgroup analyses were performed for rates of mortality and complicated bacteremia.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies with 2089 patients were included. Overall, mortality was 27.7% and 23.3% in the high and low vancomycin MIC group, respectively. No significant difference was found between vancomycin MIC groups for overall mortality, in-hospital mortality, late mortality, persistent bacteremia, severe sepsis or septic shock, acute renal failure, septic emboli or endocarditis, and osteomyelitis or septic arthritis. Early mortality was significantly associated with low vancomycin MIC. Mortality in studies using broth microdilution method (BMD) and need for mechanical ventilation were significantly associated with high vancomycin MIC.

CONCLUSION

Overall mortality and complicated bacteremia were not significantly associated with high vancomycin MICs in a patient with MRSAB. Randomized controlled trials to assess the utility of vancomycin MIC values in predicting mortality and other adverse clinical outcomes are warranted.

Evolution of Multi-Resistance to Vancomycin, Daptomycin, and Linezolid in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Causing Persistent Bacteremia

The genomic evolution in vivo in persistent infection was critical information for understanding how methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was adapted to host environments with high antibiotic selective pressure. Thirty-two successive MRSA blood isolates with incremental non-susceptibility to vancomycin (VISA), daptomycin (DRSA), and/or linezolid (LRSA) were isolated from a patient failing multiple courses of antimicrobial therapy during 1,356 days of bacteremia. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) for all consecutive isolates were conducted to characterize the evolutionary pathways, resistance-associated mutations and their temporal relationship with antimicrobial treatment. The WGS-based phylogeny categorized the isogenic strains into three major clades, I (22 isolates), II (7 isolates), and III (3 isolates), respectively, harboring a median (range) of 7 (1–30), 62 (53–65), and 118 (100–130) non-synonymous mutations when compared to the very first isolate. Clade I strains were further grouped into early and late subclades, which, respectively, shared the most recent common ancestor with Clade III strains at day 393.7 and Clade II strain at day 662.5. Clade I and Clade III strains were characterized, respectively, with high rates of VISA (9/22, 40.9%) and VISA-and-DRSA phenotype (2/3, 66.7%). Linezolid-resistance including VISA-DRSA-and-LRSA phenotype was exclusively identified in Clade II strains after eight courses of linezolid treatment. The LRSA displayed a small colony variant phenotype and were associated with G2576T mutations in domain V region of 23S rRNA. Substantial loss of mobile elements or alleles mediating resistance or virulence were identified during the evolution of multi-resistance. However, the gene loss might not be correlated to the development of VISA, DRSA, or LRSA phenotype. In conclusion, MRSA in persistent bacteremia was adapted to harsh host environment through multiple pathways involving both resistance-associated mutations and extensive gene loss.

Combination of Vancomycin or Daptomycin and Beta-lactam Antibiotics: A Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Observational and randomized controlled trials of the combination of vancomycin or daptomycin with a beta-lactam (BL) in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia have shown conflicting results on patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

The primary purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare clinical failure with the combination of vancomycin or daptomycin with a BL versus vancomycin or daptomycin monotherapy in MRSA bacteremia or endocarditis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and meeting proceedings was conducted from inception through February 11, 2020, to identify relevant studies. The primary outcome was clinical failure and secondary outcomes were mortality, nephrotoxicity, and bacteremia. The meta-analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta Analysis (version 3.0) with a random effects model. Outcomes were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Nine studies of 1636 patients receiving vancomycin or daptomycin monotherapy versus the combination of vancomycin or daptomycin plus BL for MRSA bacteremia were included. Results showed combination therapy was associated with significantly lower clinical failure rates (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.39-0.79, I²  = 26.22%, p=0.001). Improvement in clinical failure was driven by lower rates of bacteremia relapse and persistence. However, no difference was seen with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with vancomycin or daptomycin plus BL for MRSA bacteremia showed lower clinical failure rates, however, no significant difference was seen in mortality.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus replication in the presence of high (≥32 µg/ml) drug concentration of vancomycin as seen by electron microscopy

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has unfortunately become a common pathogen in many healthcare facilities. In many institutions, vancomycin remains the preferred agent for treating serious MRSA infections including bacteraemia with or without endocarditis. The mutant prevention concentration (MPC) testing ≥10⁹ colony forming units of bacteria, describes the antimicrobial drug concentration blocking the growth of the least susceptible cell from high density bacterial populations. With blood culture isolates of MRSA, we discovered strains with MPC values ≥32 µg/ml and viable cells could be readily recovered from agar plates containing 32 µg/ml of vancomycin. To investigate MRSA strains surviving in high concentrations of vancomycin on drug containing agar plates, we utilized electron microscopy to measure cell wall thickness as this has been previously reported as a potential mechanism of resistance¹ along with septum thickening. Our data shows MRSA replication from high density bacterial populations in the presence of ≥32 µg/ml of vancomycin. Such observations may explain vancomycin failure in some patients and/or persistent bacteraemia and could potentially question the use of this drug in some critically ill patients in favour of an alternative agent.

[S2k guidelines of the PEG on calculated parenteral initial treatment of bacterial diseases in adults : Focussed summary and supplementary information on antibiotic treatment of critically ill patients]

In January 2018 the recent revision of the S2k guidelines on calculated parenteral initial treatment of bacterial diseases in adults-update 2018 (Editor: Paul Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy, PEG) was realized. It is a helpful tool for the complex infectious disease setting in an intensive care unit. The present summary of the guidelines focuses on the topics of anti-infective agents, including new substances, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics as well as on microbiology, resistance development and recommendations for calculated drug therapy in septic patients. As in past revisions the recent resistance situation and results of new clinical studies are considered and anti-infective agents are summarized in a table.

Relationship Status between Vancomycin Loading Dose and Treatment Failure in Patients with MRSA Bacteremia: It's Complicated

INTRODUCTION

A one-time vancomycin loading dose of 25-30 mg/kg is recommended in the current iteration of the vancomycin consensus guidelines in order to more rapidly achieve target serum concentrations and hasten clinical improvement. However, there are few clinical data to support this practice, and the extents of its benefits are largely unknown.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective, cohort study was performed to assess the impact of a vancomycin loading dose (≥ 20 mg/kg) on clinical outcomes and rates of nephrotoxicity in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. The study matched patients in a 1:1 fashion based on age, Pitt bacteremia score, and bacteremia source. The primary outcome was composite treatment failure (30-day mortality, bacteremia duration ≥ 7 days after vancomycin initiation, persistent signs and symptoms of infection ≥ 7 days after vancomycin initiation, or switch to an alternative antimicrobial agent). Secondary outcomes included duration of bacteremia, length of stay post-bacteremia onset, and nephrotoxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 316 patients with MRSA bacteremia were included. Median first doses in the loading dose and non-loading dose groups were 23.0 mg/kg and 14.3 mg/kg, respectively (P < 0.001). No difference was found in composite failure rates between the non-loading dose and loading dose groups (40.5% vs. 36.7%; P = 0.488) or in the incidence of nephrotoxicity (12.7% vs. 16.5%; P = 0.347). While multivariable regression modeling showed receipt of a vancomycin loading dose on a mg/kg basis was not significantly associated with composite failure [aOR 0.612, 95% CI (0.368-1.019)]; post hoc analyses demonstrated that initial doses ≥ 1750 mg were independently protective against failure [aOR 0.506, 95% CI (0.284-0.902)] without increasing the risk for nephrotoxicity [aOR 0.909, 95% CI (0.432-1.911)].

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that initial vancomycin doses above a certain threshold may decrease clinical failures without increasing toxicity and that weight-based dosing might not be the optimal strategy.

More Frequent Premature Antibiotic Discontinuations and Acute Kidney Injury in the Outpatient Setting With Vancomycin Compared to Daptomycin

Vancomycin and daptomycin are often used in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy for gram-positive coverage. Vancomycin's narrow therapeutic window poses challenges. We retrospectively assessed acute kidney injury (AKI) and other adverse drug events in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy patients receiving vancomycin or daptomycin at home after hospital discharge. Among 191 patients included, AKI was the most common adverse drug event. Early antibiotic discontinuation and AKI were more frequent in the vancomycin group. Vancomycin use (odds ratio [OR], 4.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-20.51); p = 0.04], female sex (OR, 3.28; 95%CI, 1.41-7.67; P < .01), and longer hospitalization (OR, 1.06; 95%CI, 1.01-1.11; P = .02] independently predicted moderate-to-severe AKI. In the vancomycin group, trough concentrations increased after discharge, and were higher in female compared to male patients, and in those who developed moderate-to-severe AKI compared to those who did not. Female sex (OR, 8.37; 95%CI, 2.35-29.82; P < .01) and higher concentrations (OR, 1.12; 95%CI, 1.05-1.19; P < .01) predicted moderate-to-severe AKI in patients receiving vancomycin. In conclusion, premature antibiotic discontinuations and nephrotoxicity are more frequent in patients treated at home with vancomycin compared to daptomycin. Among patients receiving vancomycin, plasma concentrations increased after hospital discharge and predicted moderate-to-severe AKI. Women had higher vancomycin concentrations and higher risk for AKI.

Childress D, Maldonado RA. Comparison of Vancomycin Treatment Failures for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Stratified by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration

Background: Optimal treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremias (MRSABs) with vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) high within the susceptible range is of concern due to the high rate of mortality and increased prevalence. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate vancomycin treatment failures in patients with MRSAB stratified by vancomycin MIC. Methods: In this retrospective chart review, patients ≥19 years of age with MRSAB between July 2010 and December 2016 were included if they received intravenous vancomycin for ≥72 hours. Vancomycin treatment failures were compared between patients with vancomycin MICs of ≤1 mg/L and 2 mg/L. Vancomycin treatment failure was defined as microbiological failure at 7 days. Inpatient mortality, 30-day readmission, vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity, and early bacteremia clearance at 48 to 96 hours were assessed as secondary endpoints. Results: Fifty-eight patients were included in the vancomycin MIC ≤1 mg/L group and 22 patients in the vancomycin MIC 2 mg/L group. No significant difference was found in vancomycin treatment failures at 7 days between groups (88% vs 91%, respectively; P = .850). At 96 hours, there was no significant difference in vancomycin treatment failures between groups (72% vs 90%, respectively; P = .127). No significant difference was found in mortality (P > .99) or 30-day readmission (P > .99). Conclusions: In this study, vancomycin treatment failures were not more prevalent in patients with vancomycin MIC of 2 mg/L at 7 days. Regardless of MIC, antibiotics should be switched to an alternative agent at 7 days for persistent bacteremia.

Comparative-effectiveness of ceftaroline and daptomycin as first-line MRSA therapy for patients with sepsis admitted to hospitals in the United States Veterans Health Care System

Objectives: This study compared hospital readmission and mortality for patients with sepsis who received ceftaroline or daptomycin as first-line MRSA therapy.Methods: This retrospective comparative-effectiveness study included adults ≥18 years old hospitalized in the United States Veterans Health Care System with sepsis between 10/1/2010-9/30/2014, who received ceftaroline or daptomycin within 14 days of hospital admission as the first antibiotic effective against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Patients with pneumonia, and those who received both study drugs, were excluded. Baseline characteristics were compared using Chi-square, Fischer's exact, Student's t, and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests. Patient outcomes were compared with multivariable logistic regression models.Results: 409 patients were included (ceftaroline = 67, daptomycin = 342). Ceftaroline patients were older, less likely to be Black, more likely to have diabetes with complications, and had higher Charlson comorbidity scores. Median (interquartile range) time from admission to drug initiation was 1 (0-1) day for ceftaroline and 1 (1-3) day for daptomycin (p = 0.01). Unadjusted hospital readmission rates for ceftaroline and daptomycin, respectively, were: 30-day (25%/37%, p = 0.06), 60-day (27%/44%, p = 0.008), and 90-day (28%/46%, p = 0.01). Unadjusted mortality rates were: in-hospital (7%/12%, p = 0.4), 30-day (3%/9%, p = 0.1), 60-day (6%/12%, p = 0.2), and 90-day (7%/15%, p = 0.1). In multivariable models with all divergent baseline characteristics included as covariates, patients treated with ceftaroline were less likely to experience (OR, 95% CI): 30/60/90-day hospital readmission (0.54, 0.29-0.98; 0.42, 0.23-0.76; 0.42, 0.23-0.75) and 30/60/90-day mortality (0.23, 0.04-0.82; 0.34, 0.10-0.93; 0.34, 0.11-0.86).Conclusion: In patients with sepsis, ceftaroline was associated with fewer hospital readmissions and lower mortality as compared to daptomycin. Prospective investigations in larger, more generalized cohorts are needed to examine outcomes with specific MRSA therapies.

Acute kidney injury during daptomycin versus vancomycin treatment in cardiovascular critically ill patients: a propensity score matched analysis

Background

Gram-positive organisms are a leading cause of infection in cardiovascular surgery. Furthermore, these patients have a high risk of developing postoperative renal failure in intensive care unit (ICU). Some antibiotic drugs are known to impair renal function. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether patients treated for Gram-positive cardiovascular infection with daptomycin (DAP) experienced a lower incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) when compared to patients treated with vancomycin (VAN), with comparable efficacy.

Methods

ICU patients who received either DAP or VAN, prior to or after cardiovascular surgery or mechanical circulatory support, from January 2010 to December 2012, were included in this observational retrospective cohort study. We excluded patients with end stage renal disease and antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was the incidence of AKI within the first week of treatment. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of AKI within the first 14 days of treatment, the severity of AKI including renal replacement therapy (RRT), the rates of clinical failure (unsuccessful infection treatment) and of premature discontinuation and mortality. To minimize selection bias, we used a propensity score to compare the 2 groups. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to determine factors associated with AKI.

Results

Seventy two patients, treated for infective endocarditis, cardiovascular foreign body infection, or surgical site infection were included (DAP, n = 28 and VAN, n = 44). AKI at day 7 was observed in 28 (64%) versus 6 (21%) of the VAN and DAP patients, respectively (p = 0.001). In the multivariate analysis adjusted to the propensity score, vancomycin treatment was the only factor associated with AKI (Odds Ratio 4.42; 95% CI: 1.39–15.34; p = 0.014). RRT was required for 2 (7%) DAP patients and 13 (30%) VAN patients, p = 0.035. Premature discontinuation and clinical failure occurred more frequently in VAN group than in DAP group (25% versus 4%, p = 0.022 and 42% versus 12%, respectively, p = 0.027).

Conclusions

Daptomycin appears to be safer than vancomycin in terms of AKI risk in ICU patients treated for cardiovascular procedure-related infection. Daptomycin could be considered as a first line treatment to prevent AKI in high-risk patients.

The Continued Value of Disk Diffusion for Assessing Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Clinical Laboratories: Report from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Methods Development and Standardization Working Group

Expedited pathways to antimicrobial agent approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have led to increased delays between drug approval and the availability of FDA-cleared antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) devices. Antimicrobial disks for use with disk diffusion testing are among the first AST devices available to clinical laboratories. However, many laboratories are reluctant to implement disk diffusion testing for a variety of reasons, including dwindling proficiency with this method, interruptions of the laboratory workflow, uncertainty surrounding the quality and reliability of disk diffusion tests, and a perceived need to report MIC values to clinicians. This minireview provides a report from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Methods Development and Standardization Working Group on the current standards and clinical utility of disk diffusion testing.

Morbidity, mortality, and management of methicillin-resistant S. aureus bacteremia in the USA: update on antibacterial choices and understanding

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia is associated with significant healthcare costs, morbidity, and mortality in the United States. Complications of MRSA bacteremia include infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and sepsis, all of which are difficult to treat. Time to effective therapy and antibacterial choice greatly affect patient outcomes. Vancomycin and daptomycin remain first-line therapies; however, reports of vancomycin-associated treatment failure and reduced daptomycin susceptibility highlight the need to define alternative strategies for MRSA bacteremia treatment. In addition, several patient- and pathogen-specific factors influence the outcomes of MRSA bacteremia. It is, therefore, critical to explore the interaction between host- and pathogen-specific factors and its effect on MRSA bacteremia pathogenesis and mortality. This review discusses the factors that drive the development of MRSA bacteremia and examines alternative treatment strategies.

Multicenter Evaluation of the Accelerate PhenoTest BC Kit for Rapid Identification and Phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Using Morphokinetic Cellular Analysis

We describe results from a multicenter study evaluating the Accelerate Pheno system, a first of its kind diagnostic system that rapidly identifies common bloodstream pathogens from positive blood cultures within 90 min and determines bacterial phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results within ∼7 h. A combination of fresh clinical and seeded blood cultures were tested, and results from the Accelerate Pheno system were compared to Vitek 2 results for identification (ID) and broth microdilution or disk diffusion for AST. The Accelerate Pheno system accurately identified 14 common bacterial pathogens and two Candida spp. with sensitivities ranging from 94.6 to 100%. Of fresh positive blood cultures, 89% received a monomicrobial call with a positive predictive value of 97.3%. Six common Gram-positive cocci were evaluated for ID. Five were tested against eight antibiotics, two resistance phenotypes (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus spp. [MRSA/MRS]), and inducible clindamycin resistance (MLSb). From the 4,142 AST results, the overall essential agreement (EA) and categorical agreement (CA) were 97.6% and 97.9%, respectively. Overall very major error (VME), major error (ME), and minor error (mE) rates were 1.0%, 0.7%, and 1.3%, respectively. Eight species of Gram-negative rods were evaluated against 15 antibiotics. From the 6,331 AST results, overall EA and CA were 95.4% and 94.3%, respectively. Overall VME, ME, and mE rates were 0.5%, 0.9%, and 4.8%, respectively. The Accelerate Pheno system has the unique ability to identify and provide phenotypic MIC and categorical AST results in a few hours directly from positive blood culture bottles and support accurate antimicrobial adjustment.

Outcomes of Vancomycin plus a β-Lactam versus Vancomycin Only for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the rates of treatment failure, which was a composite of clinical and microbiologic failure, of patients receiving vancomycin and a β-lactam to those receiving vancomycin only for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. Patients 16 to 89 years of age with MRSA bacteremia admitted to a university-affiliated hospital from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2016 were screened for study inclusion. Patients were eligible if they received >48 h of vancomycin and a β-lactam (combination group) or vancomycin only (standard group) within 48 h after bacteremia onset. A total of 182 patients were screened: 47 were included in the standard group, and 63 were in the combination group. The combination group had a higher baseline body mass index (29.2 ± 8.0 kg/m² versus 25.8 ± 7.1 kg/m², P = 0.022), acute physiologic assessment and chronic health evaluation-II (APACHE-II) score (median [interquartile range], 21 [15 to 26] versus 16 [10 to 22], P = 0.003), and incidence of septic shock (31.8% versus 14.9%, P = 0.047). Using multivariate analysis, combination therapy was the only variable that decreased treatment failures (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.337 [0.142 to 0.997]), while vancomycin MIC > 1 mg/liter and male gender increased treatment failures (4.018 [1.297 to 12.444] and 2.971 [1.040 to 8.488], respectively). The 30-day mortality rates (15.0% versus 14.9%, P = 1.000) and the incidence of adverse drug events (19.1% versus 23.4%, P = 0.816) were not statistically different between the combination and standard groups. Combination therapy of vancomycin with a β-lactam led to significantly fewer treatment failures than vancomycin monotherapy for MRSA bacteremia.

The Whole Price of Vancomycin: Toxicities, Troughs, and Time

Vancomycin is a glycopeptide antibiotic that is active against Gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Nephrotoxicity, which is usually reversible, is the most serious common adverse effect of vancomycin. Vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity prolongs hospital stays, imposes a need for additional antibiotics and, in rare circumstances, dialysis treatment, and increases medical costs and mortality. Risk factors for nephrotoxicity include the dose and duration of vancomycin treatment, serum trough concentration, patient characteristics, and concomitant receipt of nephrotoxins. Contemporary guidelines recommend targeting vancomycin trough concentrations of ≥10 mg/L to prevent resistance and trough concentrations of 15-20 mg/L to optimize outcomes. There is significant correlation between vancomycin trough serum concentrations and the incidence of vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity; however, evidence of an association between trough concentrations and efficacy is less convincing. Routine monitoring of serum vancomycin concentrations consumes time and limited healthcare resources and may not be cost effective. The use of alternative antibacterial agents that do not require monitoring would free up pharmacy resources. This time could then be devoted to initiatives such as pharmacist-led antibiotic stewardship programs that are known to reduce antibiotic use and promote improved patient outcomes.

Resistance to Non-glycopeptide Agents in Serious Staphylococcus aureus Infections

The role of vancomycin in the treatment of serious Staphylococcus aureus infections, both methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant, is becoming increasingly ineffective due to increasing MIC and failure. The development of reduced vancomycin susceptibility by S. aureus to glycopeptides highlights the need for clinicians to reexamine the roles of non-glycopeptide therapy. As the use of these alternative non-glycopeptides antimicrobials increases, it will become pertinent to monitor the rates of resistance. Large surveillance programs have provided data for resistance against S. aureus for the non-glycopeptides (daptomycin, ceftaroline, tigecycline, linezolid, and tedizolid). The current published literatures suggest that worldwide resistance rates to these non-glycopeptides for serious MRSA infections are still low. Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs will be crucial in prevention of resistance of these antimicrobials against S. aureus.

Non-hospital environment contamination with Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: proportion meta-analysis and features of antibiotic resistance and molecular genetics

BACKGROUND

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), survives in dry conditions and can persist for long periods on surfaces touched by humans. Studies that estimate the proportions and characteristics of S. aureus and MRSA contamination in non-hospital environments are lacking. Therefore, we conducted a proportion meta-analysis and reviewed the features of antibiotic resistance and molecular genetics.

METHODS

Articles published between January 2005 and December 2015 that studied proportions of S. aureus and MRSA contamination in non-hospital environments were retrieved from the Medline database, Ovid database and Science Direct database. All statistics were analyzed by STATA 14.1.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine articles were included. The overall proportions of S. aureus and MRSA contamination were 41.1% (95%CI 29-54%) and 8.6% (95%CI 5-13%), respectively. The proportion of MRSA contamination increased over time. From the articles, the proportion of Panton-Valentine Leukociden (PVL) genes among MRSA isolates was 54.5%, and the proportion of the qac gene was 100.0%. Distribution of the multilocus sequence type (MLST) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of MRSA indicated that MRSA strains were from both hospitals and communities.

CONCLUSION

The overall proportions of S. aureus and MRSA contamination in non-hospital environments were high. The outcomes of antibiotic resistance and high proportions of PVL genes indicated that the antibiotic resistance of S. aureus and MRSA were notable. According to the different distributions of MLST and SCCmec of MRSA, we can infer that cross-circulation is within hospitals, communities, and livestock. The results also show that the risk from the MRSA strains was cross-transmitted among the population. High proportions of the qac gene of MRSA might indicate that current disinfection of MRSA has not been achieved, and it might be better to further identify the efficiency of the sterilization processes in a non-hospital environment so that relevant departments can take measures to improve disinfection of MRSA in non-hospital environments.

Multidrug-resistant organisms in liver transplant: Mitigating risk and managing infections

Liver transplant (LT) recipients are vulnerable to infections with multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. Risk factors for colonization and infection with resistant bacteria are ubiquitous and unavoidable in transplantation. During the past decade, progress in transplantation and infection prevention has contributed to the decreased incidence of infections with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. However, even in the face of potentially effective antibiotics, vancomycin-resistant enterococci continue to plague LT. Gram-negative bacilli prove to be more problematic and are responsible for high rates of both morbidity and mortality. Despite the licensure of novel antibiotics, there is no universal agent available to safely and effectively treat infections with MDR gram-negative organisms. Currently, efforts dedicated toward prevention and treatment require involvement of multiple disciplines including transplant providers, specialists in infectious diseases and infection prevention, and researchers dedicated to the development of rapid diagnostics and safe and effective antibiotics with novel mechanisms of action. Liver Transplantation 22 1143-1153 2016 AASLD.