Single-dose Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Canagliflozin, a Selective Inhibitor of Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2, in Healthy Indian Participants

Model-based meta-analysis of ethnic differences and their variabilities in clearance of oral drugs classified by clearance mechanism

In this study, the ethnic ratios (ERs) of oral clearance between Japanese and Western populations were subjected to model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) for 81 drugs evaluated in 673 clinical studies. The drugs were classified into eight groups according to the clearance mechanism, and the ER for each group was inferred together with interindividual variability (IIV), interstudy variability (ISV), and inter-drug variability within a group (IDV) using the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. The ER, IIV, ISV, and IDV were dependent on the clearance mechanism, and, except for particular groups such as drugs metabolized by polymorphic enzymes or their clearance mechanism is not confirmative, the ethnic difference was found to be generally small. The IIV was well-matched across ethnicities, and the ISV was approximately half of the IIV as the coefficient of variation. To adequately assess ethnic differences in oral clearance without false detections, phase I studies should be designed with full consideration of the mechanism of clearance. This study suggests that the methodology of classifying drugs based on the mechanism that causes ethnic differences and performing MBMA with statistical techniques such as MCMC analysis is helpful for a rational understanding of ethnic differences and for strategic drug development.

Amelioration of endothelial dysfunction by sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors: pieces of the puzzle explaining their cardiovascular protection

Sodium glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT‐2is) improve cardiovascular outcomes in both diabetic and non‐diabetic patients. Preclinical studies suggest that SGLT‐2is directly affect endothelial function in a glucose‐independent manner. The effects of SGLT‐2is include decreased oxidative stress and inflammatory reactions in endothelial cells. Furthermore, SGLT2is restore endothelium‐related vasodilation and regulate angiogenesis. The favourable cardiovascular effects of SGLT‐2is could be mediated via a number of pathways: (1) inhibition of the overactive sodium‐hydrogen exchanger; (2) decreased expression of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidases; (3) alleviation of mitochondrial injury; (4) suppression of inflammation‐related signalling pathways (e.g., by affecting NF‐κB); (5) modulation of glycolysis; and (6) recovery of impaired NO bioavailability. This review focuses on the most recent progress and existing gaps in preclinical investigations concerning the direct effects of SGLT‐2is on endothelial dysfunction and the mechanisms underlying such effects.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in kidney transplant recipients: what is the evidence?

Several recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the wide clinical application of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in improving kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with native kidney disease. In April 2021, Dapagliflozin became the first SGLT2 inhibitor to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD) regardless of diabetic status. However, while these agents have drawn much acclaim for their cardiovascular and nephroprotective effects among patients with native kidney disease, little is known about the safety and efficacy of SGLT2i in the kidney transplant setting. Many of the mechanisms by which SGLT2i exert their benefit stand to prove equally as efficacious or more so among kidney transplant recipients as they have in patients with CKD. However, safety concerns have excluded transplant recipients from all large RCTs, and clinicians and patients alike are left to wonder if the benefits of these amazing drugs outweigh the risks. In this review, we will discuss the known mechanisms SGLT2i exploit to provide their beneficial effects, the potential benefits, and risks of these agents in the context of kidney transplantation, and finally, we will discuss current findings of the published literature for SGLT2i use in kidney transplant recipients and propose potential directions for future research.

Structural Perspectives and Advancement of SGLT2 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes

Diabetes mellitus is an ailment that affects a large number of individuals worldwide and its pervasiveness has been predicted to increase later on. Every year, billions of dollars are spent globally on diabetes-related health care practices. Contemporary hyperglycemic therapies to rationalize Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) mostly involve pathways that are insulin-dependent and lack effectiveness as the pancreas' β-cell function declines more significantly. Homeostasis via kidneys emerges as a new and future strategy to minimize T2DM complications. This article covers the reabsorption of glucose mechanism in the kidneys, the functional mechanism of various Sodium- Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, their structure and driving profile, and a few SGLT2 inhibitors now accessible in the market as well as those in different periods of advancement. The advantages of SGLT2 inhibitors are dose-dependent glycemic regulation changes with a significant reduction both in the concentration of HbA1c and body weight clinically and statistically. A considerable number of SGLT2 inhibitors have been approved by the FDA, while a few others, still in preliminaries, have shown interesting effects.

Efficacy and safety of Sodium-Glucose-Transporter-2 inhibitors in kidney transplant patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review discusses current evidence and future perspectives for use of SLT2 inhibitors in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

RECENT FINDINGS

Sodium-Glucose-Transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) lower plasma glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes, and protect against heart failure and progression of chronic kidney disease by a glucose-independent mechanism. Most of the current studies with SGLT2is in kidney transplant patients are however short-term retrospective case studies. These, together with one small randomized clinical trial, show that SGLT2is lower glucose also in KTRs with type 2 diabetes or posttransplant diabetes mellitus. Larger reductions in HbA1c (-0.5 to 1.5% points) are seen only in patients with estimated GFR > 60 ml/min/1.73m2 and HbA1c > 8%. With lower gomerular filtration rate (GFR) or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) the glucose-lowering effect is trivial. However, a reduction in body weight, blood pressure and uric acid is also seen, whereas the frequency of side effects (mycotic or urinary tract infections) does not seem to exceed what is seen in nontransplanted patients. Long-term effects on GFR have not been studied in kidney transplanted patients, but SGLT2is induce an early dip in GFR also in these patients. This could signal a beneficial long-term effect on renal hemodynamics.

SUMMARY

SGLT2is lower glucose safely also in patients with single kidney grafts, but long-term kidney function and patient survival are yet to be explored.

Efficacy and Safety of Remogliflozin Etabonate, a New Sodium Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitor, in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A 24-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Trial

Background

Metformin is the first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but many patients either cannot tolerate it or cannot achieve glycemic control with metformin alone, so treatment with other glucose-lowering agents in combination with metformin is frequently required. Remogliflozin etabonate, a novel agent, is an orally bioavailable prodrug of remogliflozin, which is a potent and selective sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor.

Objective

Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of remogliflozin etabonate compared with dapagliflozin in subjects with T2DM in whom a stable dose of metformin as monotherapy was providing inadequate glycemic control.

Methods

A 24-week randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, three-arm, parallel-group, multicenter, phase III study was conducted in India. Patients aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 65 years diagnosed with T2DM, receiving metformin ≥ 1500 mg/day, and with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels ≥ 7 to ≤ 10% at screening were randomized into three groups. Every patient received metformin ≥ 1500 mg and either remogliflozin etabonate 100 mg twice daily (BID) (group 1, n = 225) or remogliflozin etabonate 250 mg BID (group 2, n = 241) or dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily (QD) in the morning and placebo QD in the evening (group 3, n = 146). The patients were followed-up at weeks 1 and 4 and at 4-week intervals thereafter until week 24. The endpoints included mean change in HbA1c (primary endpoint, noninferiority margin = 0.35), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), bodyweight, blood pressure, and fasting lipids. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), safety laboratory values, electrocardiogram, and vital signs were evaluated.

Results

Of 612 randomized patients, 167 (group 1), 175 (group 2), and 103 (group 3) patients with comparable baseline characteristics completed the study. Mean change ± standard error (SE) in HbA1c from baseline to week 24 was − 0.72 ± 0.09, − 0.77 ± 0.09, and − 0.58 ± 0.12% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The difference in mean HbA1c of group 1 versus group 3 (− 0.14%, 90% confidence interval [CI] − 0.38 to 0.10) and group 2 versus group 3 (− 0.19%; 90% CI − 0.42 to 0.05) was noninferior to that in group 3 (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between group 1 or group 2 and group 3 in change in FPG, PPG, and bodyweight. The overall incidence of TEAEs was comparable across study groups (group 1 = 32.6%, group 2 = 34.4%, group 3 = 29.5%), including adverse events (AEs) of special interest (hypoglycemic events, urinary tract infection, genital fungal infection). Most TEAEs were mild to moderate in intensity, and no severe AEs were reported.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated the noninferiority of remogliflozin etabonate 100 and 250 mg compared with dapagliflozin, from the first analysis of an initial 612 patients. Remogliflozin etabonate therefore may be considered an effective and well-tolerated alternative treatment option for glycemic control in T2DM.

Trial Registration

CTRI/2017/07/009121.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40265-020-01285-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Development of LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of Canagliflozin and Metformin in human plasma and its pharmacokinetic application in Indian population under fast and fed conditions

A novel, selective and sensitive method is developed for simultaneous estimation of canagliflozin and metformin and successfully applied to fast and fed pharmacokinetic studies in healthy Indian volunteers. The current study reports the development, optimization, and validation of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for simultaneous quantification of canagliflozin and metformin in human plasma using deuterated canagliflozin D4 and metformin D6 as an internal standard (IS). The solid-phase extraction technique was employed where strata X polymeric reverse phase (30 mg-1 cc) SPE cartridges were used for the extraction of analytes and IS from plasma. The ACE 5 C18 column (50 × 4.6 mm, 5µ) was used to chromatograph the prepared samples. The mobile phase consisted of methanol and 5 mM ammonium trifluoroacetate in water, pH 5 (50:50, v/v) at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. Detection was performed by positive ion Turbo ion spray in Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode, monitoring the transitions m/z 461.9 → m/z 191.1 and m/z 461.9 → m/z 267.2, for quantification of canagliflozin. The response of canagliflozin fragments m/z 461.9 → m/z 191.1 and m/z 461.9 → m/z 267.2 was combined. Also, for metformin transitions were monitored at m/z 130.0 → m/z 71.1. Full validation of the method was performed according to the United States Food and Drugs Administration (USFDA) guidelines. Linearity was in the range of 24.95-2806.55 ng/mL for canagliflozin and 24.99-3400.72 ng/mL for metformin. The mean extraction recovery of canagliflozin, canagliflozin D4, metformin, and metformin D6 was 77.240, 84.663, 66.747, and 67.449, respectively across four QC levels. This rapid method with the run time of 2.80 min allows the analysis of more than 400 plasma samples per day.

A review of clinical efficacy and safety of canagliflozin 300 mg in the management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Currently available antihyperglycemic agents, despite being effective, provide inadequate glycemic control and/or are associated with side effects or nonadherence. Canagliflozin, a widely used orally active inhibitor of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2), is a new addition to the therapeutic armamentarium of glucose-lowering drugs. This review summarizes findings from different clinical and observational studies of canagliflozin 300 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). By inhibiting SGLT2, canagliflozin reduces reabsorption of filtered glucose, thereby increasing urinary glucose excretion in patients with T2DM. Canagliflozin 300 mg has been shown to be effective in lowering glycated hemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose, and postprandial glucose in patients with T2DM. Canagliflozin 300 mg also demonstrated significant reductions in body weight and blood pressure and has a low risk of causing hypoglycemia, when not used in conjunction with insulin and insulin secretagogues. Canagliflozin 300 mg was generally well tolerated in clinical studies. The most frequently reported adverse events include genital mycotic infections, urinary tract infections, osmotic diuresis, and volume depletion-related events.