Ceftazidime-Avibactam: A Novel Cephalosporin/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination for the Treatment of Resistant Gram-negative Organisms

Molecular mechanisms responsible KPC-135-mediated resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam in ST11-K47 hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae

Ceftazidime-avibactam resistance attributable to the blaKPC-2 gene mutation is increasingly documented in clinical settings. In this study, we characterized the mechanisms leading to the development of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in ST11-K47 hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae that harboured the blaKPC-135 gene. This strain possessed fimbriae and biofilm, demonstrating pathogenicity. Compared with the wild-type KPC-2 carbapenemase, the novel KPC-135 enzyme exhibited a deletion of Glu168 and Leu169 and a 15-amino acid tandem repeat between Val262 and Ala276. The blaKPC-135 gene was located within the Tn6296 transposon truncated by IS26 and carried on an IncFII/IncR-type plasmid. Compared to the blaKPC-2-positive cloned strain, only the MIC of ceftazidime increased against blaKPC-135-positive K. pneumoniae and wasn't inhibited by avibactam (MIC 32 μg/mL), while clavulanic acid and vaborbactam demonstrated some inhibition. Kinetic parameters revealed that KPC-135 exhibited a lower Km and kcat/Km with ceftazidime and carbapenems, and a higher (∼26-fold) 50% inhibitory concentration with avibactam compared to KPC-2. The KPC-135 enzyme exerted a detrimental effect on fitness relative to the wild-type strain. Furthermore, this strain possessed hypervirulent determinants, which included the IncHI1B/FIB plasmid with rmpA2 and expression of type 1 and 3 fimbriae. In conclusion, we reported a novel KPC variant, KPC-135, in a clinical ST11-K47 hypervirulent K. pneumoniae strain, which conferred ceftazidime-avibactam resistance, possibly through increased ceftazidime affinity and decreased avibactam susceptibility. This strain simultaneously harboured resistance and virulence genes, posing an elevated challenge in clinical treatment.

Development of an effective meropenem/KPC-2 inhibitor combination to combat infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

The global public health threat of antibiotic resistance continues to escalate, and necessitates the implementation of urgent measures to expand the arsenal of antimicrobial drugs. This study identified a benzoxaborane compound, namely 5-chloro-1,3-dihydro-1-hydroxy-2,1-benzoxaborole (AN2178), which can inhibit the catalytic activity of the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC-2) enzyme effectively. The efficacy of AN2718 as an inhibitor for the KPC-2 enzyme was verified through various assays, including enzyme activity assays and isothermal titration calorimetry. Results of multiple biochemical assays, minimum inhibitory concentration assays and time-killing assays also showed that binding of AN2718 to KPC-2 enabled restoration of the bactericidal effect of meropenem. The survival rate of mice infected with carbapenem-resistant, high-virulence strains increased significantly upon treatment with AN2718. Most importantly, the meropenem and AN2718 combination was effective on KPC-2 mutations such as KPC-33, which evolved clinically and exhibited resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam after clinical use for a couple of years. Comprehensive safety tests both in vitro and in vivo, such as cytotoxicity, haemolytic activity and cytochrome P450 inhibition assays, demonstrated that AN2718 was safe for clinical use. These promising data indicate that AN2718 has high potential for approval for the treatment of drug resistant-bacterial infections, including those caused by ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant strains. AN2718 can be regarded as a valuable addition to the current antimicrobial armamentarium, and a promising tool to combat antimicrobial resistance.

Predictors of Mortality, Drug Resistance, and Determinants among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriales Infections in Chinese Elderly Patients

Elderly patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriales (CRE) infections represent considerable mortality rates. But data on the risk factors for the death of elderly patients following such infection remain limited. We aimed to assess the clinical outcomes, identify mortality-associated risk factors, and determine the antibiotic resistance and resistance genes of isolates for these patients. Hospitalized patients aged ≥65 years with CRE infection from January 2020 to December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Isolates identification and molecular characterization of CRE were carried out. Logistic regression analysis was applied to assess the potential factors associated with mortality. Of the 123 elderly patients with CRE infection included in our study, the all-cause mortality rate was 39.8% (49/123). The most prevalent pathogen was carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP, 116 of 123). The overall rates of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) were 100.0% and 66.7%. All CRE isolates exclusively harbored a singular variant of carbapenemase gene, such as bla KPC-2, bla IMP-4, bla NDM-5, or bla OXA-48, while 98.4% of isolates harbored more than one β-lactamase gene, of which 106 (86.2%) isolates harbored bla CTX-M, 121 (98.4%) isolates harbored bla TEM, and 116 (94.3%) isolates harbored bla SHV. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that mechanical ventilation (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 33.607, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.176-270.463, P < 0.001), use of tigecycline during hospitalization (AOR = 5.868, 95% CI: 1.318-26.130, P = 0.020), and APACHE II score (AOR = 1.305, 95% CI: 1.161-1.468, P < 0.001) were independent factors associated with increasing the mortality of patients with CRE infection, while admission to intensive care unit (ICU) during hospitalization (AOR = 0.046, 95% CI: 0.004-0.496, P = 0.011) was a protective factor. CRE-infected elderly patients with mechanical ventilation, use of tigecycline during hospitalization, and high APACHE II score were related to poor outcomes. The isolates carried various antibiotic genes and presented high antibiotic resistance. These findings provide crucial guidance for clinicians to devise appropriate strategies for treatment.

Resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and other new β-lactams in Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates: a multi-center surveillance study

New β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations represent last-resort antibiotics to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Carbapenemase gene acquisition can limit their spectrum of activity, and reports of resistance toward these new molecules are increasing. In this multi-center study, we evaluated the prevalence of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and comparators among P. aeruginosa clinical isolates from bloodstream infections, hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated pneumonia, and urinary tract infections, circulating in Southern Italy. We also investigated the clonality and content of relevant β-lactam resistance mechanisms of CZA-resistant (CZAR) isolates. A total of 120 P. aeruginosa isolates were collected. CZA was among the most active β-lactams, retaining susceptibility in the 81.7% of cases, preceded by cefiderocol (95.8%) and followed by ceftolozane-tazobactam (79.2%), meropenem-vaborbactam (76.1%), imipenem-relebactam (75%), and aztreonam (69.6%). Among non-β-lactams, colistin and amikacin were active against 100% and 85.8% of isolates respectively. In CZAR strains subjected to whole-genome sequencing (n = 18), resistance was mainly due to the expression of metallo-β-lactamases (66.6% VIM-type and 5.5% FIM-1), followed by PER-1 (16.6%) and GES-1 (5.5%) extended-spectrum β-lactamases, mostly carried by international high-risk clones (ST111 and ST235). Of note, two strains producing the PER-1 enzyme were resistant to all β-lactams, including cefiderocol. In conclusion, the CZA resistance rate among P. aeruginosa clinical isolates in Southern Italy remained low. CZAR isolates were mostly metallo-β-lactamases producers and belonging to ST111 and ST253 epidemic clones. It is important to implement robust surveillance systems to monitor emergence of new resistance mechanisms and to limit the spread of P. aeruginosa high-risk clones.

IMPORTANCE

Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are a growing threat due to the limited therapeutic options available. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is among the last-resort antibiotics for the treatment of difficult-to-treat P. aeruginosa infections, although resistance due to the acquisition of transferable β-lactamase genes is increasing. With this work, we report that CZA represents a highly active antipseudomonal β-lactam compound (after cefiderocol), and that metallo-β-lactamases (VIM-type) and extended-spectrum β-lactamases (GES and PER-type) production is the major factor underlying CZA resistance in isolates from Southern Italian hospitals. In addition, we reported that such resistance mechanisms were mainly carried by the international high-risk clones ST111 and ST235.

Multi-resistant organisms in burn patients: an end or a new beginning

Infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in burn patients, and the rise of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) has made it more challenging to manage and prevent infections. This review examines the available treatment options for MDROs in burn patients and anticipates the future challenges posed by their increasing prevalence. The review covers new antibiotics, such as Eravacycline and Plazomicin, as well as non-antibiotic therapies, such as bacteriophages and nanoparticles. Future research should focus on examining the long-term efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and in vivo efficacy of different treatment modalities. The potential of alternative therapies, such as probiotics and low-frequency magnetic fields, should also be explored. Accurate and rapid diagnostic and monitoring tools for detecting MDROs in burn patients should be developed. The emergence of MDROs in burn care is a challenge and a new beginning in infection innovation and novel treatments.

In vitro pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of FL058 (a novel beta-lactamase inhibitor) combined with meropenem against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales

Objective: FL058 is a novel beta-lactamase inhibitor with a broad spectrum of activity and a favorable safety profile. The objective of this study was to evaluate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships for the combination of FL058 and meropenem in an in vitro infection model. Methods: By simulating human concentration-time profiles in the in vitro model, meropenem combined with FL058 when administered 1 g/0.5 g, 1 g/1 g, 2 g/1 g, and 2 g/2 g q8h by 3-h infusion achieved approximately 2- and 4-log10 kill to KPC/OXA-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli; the combination therapy could not inhibit NDM-producing K. pneumoniae but could maintain NDM-producing E. coli around a baseline. Results: The PK/PD indexes that best described the bacterial killing from baseline in log10 CFU/mL at 24 h were the percent time of free drug above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) (%fT > MIC, MIC with FL058 at 4 mg/L) for meropenem and the percent time of free drug above 1 mg/L (%fT > 1 mg/L) for FL058. The targets for achieving a static effect and the 1- and 2-log10 kill were 74, 83, and 99 for %fT > MIC of meropenem and 40, 48, and 64 for %fT > 1 mg/L of FL058, respectively. The PK/PD index of %fT > 1 mg/L can provide a basis for evaluating clinical dosing regimens for FL058 combined with meropenem. Conclusion: FL058 combined with meropenem might be a potential treatment for KPC- and/or OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales infection.

Concomitant Resistance to Cefiderocol and Ceftazidime/Avibactam in Two Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates from Two Lung Transplant Patients

In this study, we present two cases of Klebsiella pneumoniae, one KPC-33- and one NDM-1-producing, showing resistance to cefiderocol and ceftazidime/avibactam, collected in the intensive care unit of a hospital in Northern Italy from two patients who had recently undergone lung transplantation. Whole-genome sequencing was performed to investigate the molecular features of these strains.

[Diagnosis and antibiotic therapy of nosocomial pneumonia in adults: from recommendations to real practice. A review]

Nosocomial pneumonia is a healthcare-associated infection with significant consequences for the patient and the healthcare system. The efficacy of treatment significantly depends on the timeliness and adequacy of the antibiotic therapy regimen. The growth of resistance of gram-negative pathogens of nosocomial pneumonia to antimicrobial agents increases the risk of prescribing inadequate empirical therapy, which worsens the results of patient treatment. Identification of risk factors for infection with multidrug-resistant microorganisms, careful local microbiological monitoring with detection of resistance mechanisms, implementation of antimicrobial therapy control strategy and use of rational combinations of antibacterial drugs are of great importance. In addition, the importance of using new drugs with activity against carbapenem-resistant strains, including ceftazidime/aviabactam, must be understood. This review outlines the current data on the etiology, features of diagnosis and antibacterial therapy of nosocomial pneumonia.

Characteristics of a ceftadine/avibatam resistance KPC-33-producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae strain with capsular serotype K19 belonging to ST15

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to characterize the blaKPC-33 in a ST15-K19 ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strain after the antibiotic CAZ-AVI was approved for use in Wuxi No. 2 People's Hospital, China.

METHODS

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by the microdilution broth method. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed using PacBio II and MiSeq sequencers. High-quality reads were assembled using the SOAPdenovo and GapCloser v1.12, and genome annotation was performed using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP). Genomic characteristics were analysed by using bioinformatics methods.

RESULTS

K. pneumoniae strain KPHRJ showed resistance to CAZ-AVI. WGS analysis showed that strain KPHRJ had one 5 536 506 bp chromosome (57.25% G+C content) and one plasmid (133 451 bp, G+C 54.29%). KPHRJ was classified as ST15 and K19 serotype. Resistome analysis showed that KPHRJ carries seven antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs). WGS analysis and conjugation experiments demonstrated that the blaKPC-33 gene was carried by plasmid pKPHRJ, flanked by two copies of IS26 mobile elements (IS26-ISKpn27-blaKPC-33-ISKpn6-korC-TnAs1-tetR-tetA-Tn3-IS26). Besides these acquired resistance genes, mutations in porin protein-coding genes, such as OmpK36 and OmpK37, which may reduce susceptibility to the CAZ-AVI, were also identified from the genome.

CONCLUSION

Here, we present the WGS of a CAZ-AVI resistant K. pneumoniae isolate, strain KPHRJ, with capsular serotype K19 and belonging to ST15. CAZ-AVI resistance is likely conferred by a KPC-2 variant, blaKPC-33 and mutations in porin-coding genes. We speculate that the approval of the CAZ-AVI in hospital could contribute to the emergence of these genomic features by providing a selective pressure leading to the emergence of CAZ-AVI resistant bacteria.

Inhibition of β-lactamase function by de novo designed peptide

Antimicrobial resistance is a great public health concern that is now described as a "silent pandemic". The global burden of antimicrobial resistance requires new antibacterial treatments, especially for the most challenging multidrug-resistant bacteria. There are various mechanisms by which bacteria develop antimicrobial resistance including expression of β-lactamase enzymes, overexpression of efflux pumps, reduced cell permeability through downregulation of porins required for β-lactam entry, or modifications in penicillin-binding proteins. Inactivation of the β-lactam antibiotics by β-lactamase enzymes is the most common mechanism of bacterial resistance to these agents. Although several effective small-molecule inhibitors of β-lactamases such as clavulanic acid and avibactam are clinically available, they act only on selected class A, C, and some class D enzymes. Currently, none of the clinically approved inhibitors can effectively inhibit Class B metallo-β-lactamases. Additionally, there is increased resistance to these inhibitors reported in several bacteria. The objective of this study is to use the Resonant Recognition Model (RRM), as a novel strategy to inhibit/modulate specific antimicrobial resistance targets. The RRM is a bio-physical approach that analyzes the distribution of energies of free electrons and posits that there is a significant correlation between the spectra of this energy distribution and related protein biological activity. In this study, we have used the RRM concept to evaluate the structure-function properties of a group of 22 β-lactamase proteins and designed 30-mer peptides with the desired RRM spectral periodicities (frequencies) to function as β-lactamase inhibitors. In contrast to the controls, our results indicate 100% inhibition of the class A β-lactamases from Escherichia coli and Enterobacter cloacae. Taken together, the RRM model can likely be utilized as a promising approach to design β-lactamase inhibitors for any specific class. This may open a new direction to combat antimicrobial resistance.

In Vitro Susceptibility to Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Comparator Antimicrobial Agents of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Isolates

The emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) has been recognized as a significant concern globally. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor that has demonstrated activity against isolates producing class A, C, and D β-lactamases. Here-in, we evaluated the in vitro activity of CZA and comparator antimicrobial agents against 858 CRE isolates, arising from the Southeast Asian region, collected from a large tertiary hospital in Singapore. These CRE isolates mainly comprised Klebsiella pneumoniae (50.5%), Escherichia coli (29.4%), and Enterobacter cloacae complex (17.1%). Susceptibility rates to levofloxacin, imipenem, meropenem, doripenem, aztreonam, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, tigecycline, and polymyxin B were low. CZA was the most active β-lactam agent against 68.9% of the studied isolates, while amikacin was the most active agent among all comparator antibiotics (80% susceptibility). More than half of the studied isolates (51.4%) identified were Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-2 producers, 25.9% were New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM) producers, and Oxacillinase (OXA)-48-like producers made up 10.7%. CZA was the most active β-lactam agent against KPC-2, OXA-48-like, and Imipenemase (IMI) producers (99.3% susceptible; MIC50/90: ≤1/2 mg/L). CZA had excellent activity against the non-carbapenemase-producing CRE (91.4% susceptible; MIC50/90: ≤1/8 mg/L). Expectedly, CZA had no activity against the metallo-β-lactamases (MBL)-producing CRE (NDM- and Imipenemase MBL (IMP) producers; 27.2% isolates), and the carbapenemase co-producing CRE (NDM + KPC, NDM + OXA-48-like, NDM + IMP; 3.0% isolates). CZA is a promising addition to our limited armamentarium against CRE infections, given the reasonably high susceptibility rates against these CRE isolates. Careful stewardship and rational dosing regimens are required to preserve CZA's utility against CRE infections.

Polymyxin combination therapy for multidrug-resistant, extensively-drug resistant, and difficult-to-treat drug-resistant gram-negative infections: is it superior to polymyxin monotherapy?

INTRODUCTION

The increasing prevalence of infections with multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively-drug resistant (XDR) or difficult-to-treat drug resistant (DTR) Gram-negative bacilli (GNB), including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter species, and Escherichia coli poses a severe challenge.

AREAS COVERED

The rapid growing of multi-resistant GNB as well as the considerable deceleration in development of new anti-infective agents have made polymyxins (e.g. polymyxin B and colistin) a mainstay in clinical practices as either monotherapy or combination therapy. However, whether the polymyxin-based combinations lead to better outcomes remains unknown. This review mainly focuses on the effect of polymyxin combination therapy versus monotherapy on treating GNB-related infections. We also provide several factors in designing studies and their impact on optimizing polymyxin combinations.

EXPERT OPINION

An abundance of recent in vitro and preclinical in vivo data suggest clinical benefit for polymyxin-drug combination therapies, especially colistin plus meropenem and colistin plus rifampicin, with synergistic killing against MDR, XDR, and DTR P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii. The beneficial effects of polymyxin-drug combinations (e.g. colistin or polymyxin B + carbapenem against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, polymyxin B + carbapenem + rifampin against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, and colistin + ceftolozan/tazobactam + rifampin against PDR-P. aeruginosa) have often been shown in clinical setting by retrospective studies. However, high-certainty evidence from large randomized controlled trials is necessary. These clinical trials should incorporate careful attention to patient's sample size, characteristics of patient's groups, PK/PD relationships and dosing, rapid detection of resistance, MIC determinations, and therapeutic drug monitoring.

Efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam in various combinations for the treatment of experimental osteomyelitis due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

BACKGROUND

Optimal treatment of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) bone infections is poorly defined. This study evaluated the efficacy of the novel beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor-ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-with different antibiotic combinations in an experimental model of CPE osteomyelitis.

METHODS

KPC-99YC is a clinical strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae with intermediate susceptibility to meropenem (MIC 4 mg/L), gentamicin (MIC 0.25 mg/L), colistin (MIC 0.25 mg/L), fosfomycin (MIC 4 mg/L) and ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC 1 mg/L). Time-kill curves were performed at 4x MIC. Osteomyelitis was induced in rabbits by tibial injection of 2×10⁸ CFU of KPC-99YC. Six groups started treatment 14 days later for 7 days: control, colistin, CAZ-AVI, CAZ-AVI plus gentamicin, CAZ-AVI plus colistin and CAZ-AVI plus fosfomycin. Antibiotic dosages were selected to simulate plasma concentrations obtained in humans. Treatment was evaluated according to bone cultures quantified in log₁₀ CFU.

RESULTS

In vitro, CAZ-AVI plus colistin or gentamicin were rapidly bactericidal in contrast with CAZ-AVI plus fosfomycin. In vivo, compared with controls, colistin alone (P = 0.045) and CAZ-AVI alone or in combination significantly lowered bone bacterial counts (P < 0.001). Bone sterilisation was achieved in 67% and 100% of animals with combinations of CAZ-AVI plus colistin or gentamicin (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively) whereas other treatments were no different from controls. CAZ-AVI plus gentamicin provided greater bone bacterial reduction than CAZ-AVI plus colistin (P = 0.033). No CAZ-AVI-resistant strains emerged in treated rabbits, regardless of combination.

CONCLUSIONS

CAZ-AVI plus gentamicin was the best effective combination therapy. Combinations with CAZ-AVI appear to be a promising treatment of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae osteomyelitis.

Rapid Evolution of a Fragment-like Molecule to Pan-Metallo-Beta-Lactamase Inhibitors: Initial Leads toward Clinical Candidates

With the emergence and rapid spreading of NDM-1 and existence of clinically relevant VIM-1 and IMP-1, discovery of pan inhibitors targeting metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs) became critical in our battle against bacterial infection. Concurrent with our fragment and high-throughput screenings, we performed a knowledge-based search of known metallo-beta-lactamase inhibitors (MBLIs) to identify starting points for early engagement of medicinal chemistry. A class of compounds exemplified by 11, discovered earlier as B. fragilis metallo-beta-lactamase inhibitors, was selected for in silico virtual screening. From these efforts, compound 12 was identified with activity against NDM-1 only. Initial exploration on metal binding design followed by structure-guided optimization led to the discovery of a series of compounds represented by 23 with a pan MBL inhibition profile. In in vivo studies, compound 23 in combination with imipenem (IPM) robustly lowered the bacterial burden in a murine infection model and became the lead for the invention of MBLI clinical candidates.

Subinhibitory Concentrations of Antibiotics Alter the Response of Klebsiella pneumoniae to Components of Innate Host Defense

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates classified as multilocus sequence type 258 (ST258) are a problem in health care settings in many countries globally. ST258 isolates are resistant to multiple classes of antibiotics and can cause life-threatening infections, such as pneumonia and sepsis, in susceptible individuals. Treatment strategies for such infections are limited. Understanding the response of K. pneumoniae to host factors in the presence of antibiotics could reveal mechanisms employed by the pathogen to evade killing in the susceptible host, as well as inform treatment of infections. Here, we investigated the ability of antibiotics at subinhibitory concentrations to alter K. pneumoniae capsular polysaccharide (CPS) production and survival in normal human serum (NHS). Unexpectedly, pretreatment with some of the antibiotics tested enhanced ST258 survival in NHS. For example, a subinhibitory concentration of mupirocin increased survival for 7 of 10 clinical isolates evaluated and there was increased cell-associated CPS for 3 of these isolates compared with untreated controls. Additionally, mupirocin pretreatment caused concomitant reduction in the deposition of the serum complement protein C5b-9 on the surface of these three isolates. Transcriptome analyses with a selected ST258 isolate (34446) indicated that genes implicated in the stringent response and/or serum resistance were upregulated following mupirocin treatment and/or culture in NHS. In conclusion, mupirocin and/or human serum causes changes in the K. pneumoniae transcriptome that likely contribute to the observed decrease in serum susceptibility via a multifactorial process. Whether these responses can be extended more broadly and thus impact clinical outcome in the human host merits further investigation. IMPORTANCE The extent to which commensal bacteria are altered by exposure to subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics (outside resistance) remains incompletely determined. To gain a better understanding of this phenomenon, we tested the ability of selected antibiotics (at subinhibitory concentrations) to alter survival of ST258 clinical isolates in normal human serum. We found that exposure of ST258 to antibiotics at low concentrations differentially altered gene expression, capsule production, serum complement deposition, and bacterial survival. The findings were isolate and antibiotic dependent but provide insight into a potential confounding issue associated with ST258 infections.

Deciphering the Role of β-Lactamase Inhibitors, Membrane Permeabilizers and Efflux Pump Inhibitors as Emerging Targets in Antibiotic Resistance

Antimicrobial drugs have been noticed to have reduce activity effective due to upsurge witnessed in resistance of microbes. To deal with viewpoint of such a circumstance, we must seek ways to prevent it or atleast mitigate its effects in order to provide its activity against the microbes. Hence, novel antimicrobials are the one of the most promising solution for ending antimicrobial resistance. Furthermore, due to the less development of newer antimicrobials in recent years, the only way to combat microbial resistance are various synergistic approaches of exploring antimicrobial drug combinations. This combination's efficacy is due to a synergistic chemical that re-sensitizes the resistant microbial strain. It has been observed that classes of β-lactamases inhibitors, efflux pump inhibitors and membrane permeabilizers are of particular relevance, since they can break resistance to the most commonly used antimicrobials. This review explains the readers that how these synergistic combinations can help to reduce or eliminate the microbial resistance supported with clinical evidence.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12088-022-01045-6.

Diversity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance Mechanism in KPC2-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Under Antibiotic Selection Pressure

Purpose

The aim of this study was to understand the resistance mechanism of ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae under antibiotic selection pressure.

Patients and Methods

Four CZA-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains were isolated from two patients, and six CZA-resistant strains that were produced in vitro were screened from 25 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains. The mechanisms of resistance to CZA of these strains were characterized by PCR and Sanger sequencing.

Results

CZA-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae with different resistance mechanisms (including upregulation of the expression of efflux pumps and KPC variants (KPC-14, KPC-44)) were isolated from the same patient (patient 1). In patient 2, the resistance mechanism of CZA-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae was the mutation of KPC-2 to KPC-33. In addition, among the CZA-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae that were produced in vitro, we found 3 new KPC variants: KPC-86 (D179G), KPC-87 (GT241A) and KPC-88 (G523T).

Conclusion

In this study, although the CZA-resistant bacteria originated from only two clinical patients, four different mechanisms of CZA resistance were detected. In the in vitro induction experiment, the mechanisms of resistance to CZA in strains from different patients were also different. The above result implies that the mechanisms of resistance to CZA are generally random and diverse. Therefore, elucidating the mechanism of resistance to CZA can provide a certain theoretical basis for the effective response of CZA-resistant strains and the selection of antibiotics.

Early and Appropriate Use of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Management of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections in the Indian Scenario

The increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens exerts a substantial burden on the healthcare infrastructure worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared that multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative pathogens, especially, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as the topmost priority while developing newer antimicrobials. The increasing prevalence of infectious diseases caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria also poses a challenge when choosing the empiric antimicrobial therapy for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The infections caused by MDR Gram-negative organisms ultimately result in increased mortality, morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, and increased cost of management. To tackle these challenges, newer antimicrobials like ceftazidime-avibactam were explored. The article also discusses the in vitro activity and therapeutic efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam along with its pharmacokinetic properties and the role it will play in the management of MDR Gram-negative organisms in the Indian setting. Several studies have highlighted the role of early and appropriate antibiotic use in the reduction of mortality in patients with Gram-negative infections. Timely initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy for serious infections leads to favorable clinical outcomes. Early and appropriate use of ceftazidime-avibactam while treating MDR Gram-negative infections has been associated with improved clinical outcomes. The aim of this review is to highlight the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections. We have also summarized the information on outcomes achieved by early and appropriate use of ceftazidime-avibactam.

Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Among Patients with Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Evaluation of Antibiotic Combinations and Susceptibility to New Antibiotics

Background

Carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria, particularly Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae), are at the forefront of the list of causative agents of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The treatment options for such infections are limited, and various antimicrobial combinations have been suggested as alternatives in clinical practice. New antibiotics, such as ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and cefiderocol, have shown advantages in both in vitro and clinical studies.

Purpose

To evaluate the in vitro effect of meropenem–ciprofloxacin and meropenem–colistin combinations on carbapenem-resistant (CR) K. pneumoniae VAP isolates and to determine their susceptibility to new antibiotics.

Methods

Seventy-three K. pneumoniae isolates from 176 endotracheal samples from VAP cases were studied. Antibiotic susceptibility testing and phenotypic detection of extended-spectrum β lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenemase production were done. CR K. pneumoniae isolates were tested for the five predominant carbapenemase genes (bla_KPC, bla_OXA-48, bla_NDM,bla_VIM, and bla_IMP). In vitro evaluation of meropenem–ciprofloxacin and meropenem–colistin combinations was done by MIC test strips. Susceptibility to new antibiotics was tested by disk diffusion method.

Results

Sixty-three (86.3%) of the isolates were ESBL producers and 52 (71.2%) were carbapenem resistant. Bla_NDM was the most prevalent carbapenemase gene (50%), followed by bla_OXA-48, (36.5%) then bla_KPC in (11.5%). Bla_VIM and bla_IMP were not detected. Meropenem–ciprofloxacin combination showed indifferent effect on all isolates, while meropenem–colistin combination showed 25% synergism, 15.4% addition and 59.6% indifference. All (100%) CR K. pneumoniae isolates were resistant to ceftolozane/tazobactam and 79% were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, while 96% were sensitive to cefiderocol.

Conclusion

A high rate of carbapenem resistance exists among VAP K. pneumoniae isolates. Meropenem–colistin combination and cefiderocol appear to be potential treatment options for infections caused by CR K. pneumoniae. Resistance to the tested new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors was high, signifying a major threat.

Multiple Novel Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Resistant Variants of blaKPC-2-Positive Klebsiella pneumoniae in Two Patients

As the first-line antimicrobial agent for the infection caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, ceftazidime-avibactam develops drug resistance during its ever-growing clinical use. In this study, we report multiple novel variants in blaKPC-2-positive Klebsiella pneumoniae from two separate patients during their exposure to ceftazidime-avibactam. For one patient, the blaKPC-2 gene carried by K. pneumoniae mutated into blaKPC-35, blaKPC-78, and blaKPC-33 over the same period, while that for the other patient mutated into blaKPC-79 and further evolved into blaKPC-76 to enhance resistance level, among which blaKPC-76 and blaKPC-79 were reported for the first time. In contrast with blaKPC-2, the emergent mutations within the Ω-loop conferred high-level resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam with a sharp reduction of carbapenemase activity. These blaKPC-positive K. pneumoniae isolated from sputum (both patients) and cerebrospinal fluid (patient 2) belonged to ST11 and ST859, respectively. All strains located blaKPC alleles on IncFII/IncR plasmids, except one on an IncFII plasmid. Such blaKPC-2 variants first appeared after 9 to 18 days of ceftazidime-avibactam usage, but the lack of its feasible detection method often led to the assumption of ceftazidime-avibactam sensitivity resulting in clinical incorrect usage. Subsequent substitution of ceftazidime-avibactam with carbapenems also failed, because the blaKPC-2-containing K. pneumoniae dominated again. Ultimately, treatment failed even with the therapeutic regimen of ceftazidime-avibactam combined with carbapenems, because of the inadequate concentration of avibactam in infection sites and decreased drug sensitivity of strains caused by increased expression of blaKPC and point mutation of ompK35 and ompK36. As novel KPC variants conferring resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam are constantly emerging worldwide, quick and efficient laboratory detection and surveillance are urgently needed for infection control. IMPORTANCE Carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae which was classified as the most urgent threat by World Health Organization, is the most critical public health concern due to its high mortality rate. Recently, the rapid mutation of blaKPC has occurred during anti-infective therapy, which posed an unexpected challenge for both the diagnostic laboratory and clinical practice.

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: in vitro translational biology

Previous reviews of ceftazidime/avibactam have focused on in vitro molecular enzymology and microbiology or the clinically associated properties of the combination. Here we take a different approach. We initiate a series of linked reviews that analyse research on the combination that built the primary pharmacology data required to support the clinical and business risk decisions to perform randomized controlled Phase 3 clinical trials, and the additional microbiological research that was added to the above, and the safety and chemical manufacturing and controls data, that constituted successful regulatory licensing applications for ceftazidime/avibactam in multiple countries, including the USA and the EU. The aim of the series is to provide both a source of reference for clinicians and microbiologists to be able to use ceftazidime/avibactam to its best advantage for patients, but also a case study of bringing a novel β-lactamase inhibitor (in combination with an established β-lactam) through the microbiological aspects of clinical development and regulatory applications, updated finally with a review of resistance occurring in patients under treatment. This first article reviews the biochemistry, structural biology and basic microbiology of the combination, showing that avibactam inhibits the great majority of serine-dependent β-lactamases in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to restore the in vitro antibacterial activity of ceftazidime. Translation to efficacy against infections in vivo is reviewed in the second co-published article, Nichols et al. (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; dkac172).

Resistance to Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Meropenem/Vaborbactam and Imipenem/Relebactam in Gram-Negative MDR Bacilli: Molecular Mechanisms and Susceptibility Testing

Multidrug resistance (MDR) represents a serious global threat due to the rapid global spread and limited antimicrobial options for treatment of difficult-to-treat (DTR) infections sustained by MDR pathogens. Recently, novel β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (βL-βLICs) have been developed for the treatment of DTR infections due to MDR Gram-negative pathogens. Although novel βL-βLICs exhibited promising in vitro and in vivo activities against MDR pathogens, emerging resistances to these novel molecules have recently been reported. Resistance to novel βL-βLICs is due to several mechanisms including porin deficiencies, increasing carbapenemase expression and/or enzyme mutations. In this review, we summarized the main mechanisms related to the resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam in MDR Gram-negative micro-organisms. We focused on antimicrobial activities and resistance traits with particular regard to molecular mechanisms related to resistance to novel βL-βLICs. Lastly, we described and discussed the main detection methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of such molecules. With increasing reports of resistance to novel βL-βLICs, continuous attention should be maintained on the monitoring of the phenotypic traits of MDR pathogens, into the characterization of related mechanisms, and on the emergence of cross-resistance to these novel antimicrobials.

German Multicenter Study Analyzing Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam of Clinical Meropenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Using a Commercially Available Broth Microdilution Assay

Multidrug resistance is an emerging healthcare issue, especially concerning Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In this multicenter study, P. aeruginosa isolates with resistance against meropenem detected by routine methods were collected and tested for carbapenemase production and susceptibility against ceftazidime-avibactam. Meropenem-resistant isolates of P. aeruginosa from various clinical materials were collected at 11 tertiary care hospitals in Germany from 2017−2019. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined via microdilution plates (MICRONAUT-S) of ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem at each center. Detection of the presence of carbapenemases was performed by PCR or immunochromatography. For meropenem-resistant isolates (n = 448), the MIC range of ceftazidime-avibactam was 0.25−128 mg/L, MIC90 was 128 mg/L and MIC50 was 16 mg/L. According to EUCAST clinical breakpoints, 213 of all meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates were categorized as susceptible (47.5%) to ceftazidime-avibactam. Metallo-β-lactamases (MBL) could be detected in 122 isolates (27.3%). The MIC range of ceftazidime-avibactam in MBL-positive isolates was 4−128 mg/L, MIC90 was >128 mg/L and MIC50 was 32 mg/L. There was strong variation in the prevalence of MBL-positive isolates among centers. Our in vitro results support ceftazidime-avibactam as a treatment option against infections caused by meropenem-resistant, MBL-negative P. aeruginosa.

Co-resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol in clinical isolates producing KPC variants

Cefiderocol (FDC) and ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) are among the latest generation of commercialized antibiotics against carbapenem-resistant Gram negatives. However, emergence of CZA resistance is being increasingly reported, involving different KPC variants in Enterobacterales. By analyzing two CZA-resistant KPC-3 clinical variants, KPC-41 and KPC-50, we showed that KPC-41, and to a lesser extent KPC-50, may also have an impact on susceptibility to FDC leading to a cross-resistance. This feature highlights that a susceptibility testing to FDC is mandatory prior any clinical use of FDC for treating infections due to KPC producers.

Evaluation of the EUCAST Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test for Enterobacterales-Containing Blood Cultures in China

Bloodstream infection (BSI) is defined by the presence of microbes in the bloodstream and has high mortality. Early antimicrobial therapy is key to treating BSI patients. Because of potential antimicrobial resistance, rapid evaluation for the most suitable antimicrobial therapy is important for appropriate treatment. In China, the current workflow of microbiological diagnosis in BSI involves blood culture, species identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing, which takes around 3 days. However, this delay could lead to worse symptoms. To rapidly and accurately assess antimicrobial susceptibility, in this study, we applied EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) to determine the antimicrobial susceptibilities of the most frequently detected Enterobacterales sampled in China, including Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Based on EUCAST guidelines, we evaluated its efficiencies with six commercially available antimicrobials, including imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), amikacin (30 μg), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), with bacterium-spiked blood cultures. In addition, we developed potential breakpoints for a recently introduced antimicrobial, 30/20 μg ceftazidime-avibactam, which has high potential for treating multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales. Our results showed that EUCAST RAST is a reliable method for rapidly determining the antimicrobial susceptibilities of BSI-causing bacteria in China, with an overall categorical agreement rate at 8 h of ≥90%. The breakpoints developed in this study can categorize the isolates sampled in this study with an accuracy of 93%. Results from our experiments can be applied to clinically determine the microbial susceptibility of BSI-causing bacteria within 8 h and benefit clinical diagnostics for BSI patients.

The Efficacy of Using Combination Therapy against Multi-Drug and Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Clinical Settings

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative bacterium which is capable of developing a high level of antibiotic resistance. It has been placed on the WHO's critical priority pathogen list and it is commonly found in ventilator-associated pneumonia infections, blood stream infections and other largely hospital-acquired illnesses. These infections are difficult to effectively treat due to their increasing antibiotic resistance and as such patients are often treated with antibiotic combination regimens.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search with screening criteria using the Ovid search engine and the Embase, Ovid Medline, and APA PsycInfo databases.

RESULTS

It was found that in many cases the combination therapies were able to match or outperform the monotherapies and none performed noticeably worse than the monotherapies. However, the clinical studies were mostly small, only a few were prospective randomized clinical trials and statistical significance was lacking.

CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that combination therapies have a place in the treatment of these highly resistant bacteria and, in some cases, there is some evidence to suggest that they provide a more effective treatment than monotherapies.

Development of Antibiofilm Therapeutics Strategies to Overcome Antimicrobial Drug Resistance

A biofilm is a community of stable microorganisms encapsulated in an extracellular matrix produced by themselves. Many types of microorganisms that are found on living hosts or in the environment can form biofilms. These include pathogenic bacteria that can serve as a reservoir for persistent infections, and are culpable for leading to a broad spectrum of chronic illnesses and emergence of antibiotic resistance making them difficult to be treated. The absence of biofilm-targeting antibiotics in the drug discovery pipeline indicates an unmet opportunity for designing new biofilm inhibitors as antimicrobial agents using various strategies and targeting distinct stages of biofilm formation. The strategies available to control biofilm formation include targeting the enzymes and proteins specific to the microorganism and those involved in the adhesion pathways leading to formation of resistant biofilms. This review primarily focuses on the recent strategies and advances responsible for identifying a myriad of antibiofilm agents and their mechanism of biofilm inhibition, including extracellular polymeric substance synthesis inhibitors, adhesion inhibitors, quorum sensing inhibitors, efflux pump inhibitors, and cyclic diguanylate inhibitors. Furthermore, we present the structure–activity relationships (SAR) of these agents, including recently discovered biofilm inhibitors, nature-derived bioactive scaffolds, synthetic small molecules, antimicrobial peptides, bioactive compounds isolated from fungi, non-proteinogenic amino acids and antibiotics. We hope to fuel interest and focus research efforts on the development of agents targeting the uniquely complex, physical and chemical heterogeneous biofilms through a multipronged approach and combinatorial therapeutics for a more effective control and management of biofilms across diseases.

Development and Research Progress of Anti-Drug Resistant Bacteria Drugs

Bacterial resistance has become increasingly serious because of the widespread use and abuse of antibiotics. In particular, the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria has posed a serious threat to human public health and attracted the attention of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the governments of various countries. Therefore, the establishment of measures against bacterial resistance and the discovery of new antibacterial drugs are increasingly urgent to better contain the emergence of bacterial resistance and provide a reference for the development of new antibacterial drugs. In this review, we discuss some antibiotic drugs that have been approved for clinical use and a partial summary of the meaningful research results of anti-drug resistant bacterial drugs in different fields, including the antibiotic drugs approved by the FDA from 2015 to 2020, the potential drugs against drug-resistant bacteria, the new molecules synthesized by chemical modification, combination therapy, drug repurposing, immunotherapy and other therapies.

New β-Lactam Antibiotics and Ceragenins - A Study to Assess Their Potential in Treatment of Infections Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Background

The increasing number of infections caused by antibiotic resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa posed a very serious challenge for clinical practice. This standing is driving scientists to develop new antibiotics against these microorganisms.

Methods

In this study, we measured the MIC/MBC values and estimated the ability of tested molecules to prevent bacterial biofilm formation to explore the effectiveness of β-lactam antibiotics ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, and ceragenins CSA-13, CSA-44, and CSA-131 against 150 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa that were divided into five groups, based on their antibiotic resistance profiles to beta-lactams. Selected strains of microorganisms from each group were also subjected to prolonged incubations (20 passages) with ceragenins to probe the development of resistance towards those molecules. Cytotoxicity of tested ceragenins was evaluated using human red blood cell (RBCs) hemolysis and microscopy observations of human lung epithelial A549 cells after ceragenin treatment. Poloxamer 407 (pluronic F-127) at concentrations ranging from 0.5% to 5% was tested as a potential drug delivery substrate to reduce ceragenin toxicity.

Results

Collected data proved that ceragenins at low concentrations are highly active against clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa regardless of their resistance mechanisms to conventional antibiotics. Ceragenins also show low potential for resistance development, high antibiofilm activity, and controlled toxicity when used together with poloxamer 407.

Conclusion

This data strongly supports the need for further study directed to develop this group of molecules as new antibiotics to fighting infections caused by antibiotic resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Comparison of novel rapid diagnostic of blood culture identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing by Accelerate Pheno system and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panels

Background

Conventional turnaround time (TAT) for positive blood culture (PBC) identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is 2–3 days. We evaluated the TAT and ID/AST performance using clinical and seeded samples directly from PBC bottles with different commercial approaches: (1) Accelerate Pheno® system (Pheno) for ID/AST; (2) BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panel and/ or BCID2 for ID; (3) direct AST by VITEK® 2 (direct AST); and (4) overnight culture using VITEK® 2 colony AST.

Results

A total of 141 PBC samples were included in this evaluation. Using MALDI-TOF (Bruker MALDI Biotyper) as the reference method for ID, the overall monomicrobial ID sensitivity/specificity are as follows: Pheno 97.9/99.9%; BCID 100/100%; and BCID2 100/100%, respectively. For AST performance, broth microdilution (BMD) was used as the reference method. For gram-negatives, overall categorical and essential agreements (CA/EA) for each method were: Pheno 90.3/93.2%; direct AST 92.6/88.5%; colony AST 94.4/89.5%, respectively. For gram-positives, the overall CA/EAs were as follows: Pheno 97.2/98.89%; direct AST 97.2/100%; colony AST 97.2/100%, respectively. The BCID/BCID2 and direct AST TATs were around 9–20 h (1/9-19 h for ID with resistance markers/AST), with 15 min/sample hands-on time. In comparison, Pheno TATs were around 8–10 h (1.5/7 h for ID/AST) with 2 min/sample hands-on time, maintains a clinically relevant fast report of antibiotic minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and allows for less TAT and hands-on time.

Conclusion

In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study conducted as such in Asia; all studied approaches achieved satisfactory performance, factors such as TAT, panel of antibiotics choices and hands-on time should be considered for the selection of appropriate rapid ID and AST of PBC methods in different laboratory settings.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12866-021-02403-y.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Based Versus Tigecycline-Based Regimen for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae-Induced Pneumonia in Critically Ill Patients

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present study was to assess the safety profile and outcomes of a ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-based regimen and compare them with those of a tigecycline (TGC)-based regimen in intensive care unit (ICU) for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP), which is classified into hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

METHODS

Clinical and microbiological cure rates, 28-day survival rates, and safety evaluation findings were compared between patients treated with CAZ-AVI-based regimen and those treated with TGC-based regimen in this retrospective study. Conventional multivariate logistic regression analysis and regression adjustment analysis with propensity score (PS) were performed to control for confounding variables.

RESULTS

A total of 105 cases of critically ill ICU patients with CRKP-induced HAP or VAP were included in the present study from July 2019 to September 2020; 62 patients (59%) received TGC-based regimen and 43 patients (41%) received CAZ-AVI-based regimen. The most common concomitant agent in the CAZ-AVI group and TGC group was carbapenem (44.2% versus 62.9%, P = 0.058), while only a small proportion of the study population received CAZ-AVI and TGC monotherapy (20.9% versus 6.5%, P = 0.027). The clinical and microbiological cure rates of the CAZ-AVI group were superior to those of the TGC group [51.2% versus 29.0% (P = 0.022) and 74.4% versus 33.9% (P < 0.001), respectively]. No significant differences in the 28-day survival rates were identified between the two groups (69.8% versus 66.1%, P = 0.695). Conventional multivariate logistic regression and PS analyses showed that patients who had used CAZ-AVI were more likely to have achieved a clinical cure [4.767 (95%CI 1.694-13.414), P=0.003;3.405 (95%CI 1.304-8.889), P=0.012] and microbiological success [6.664 (95%CI 2.626-16.915), P<0.001;7.778 (95%CI 2.717-22.265), P<0.001] than patients who used TGC. However, the difference in the 28-day survival rates between the two groups was not significant. According to the safety evaluation findings, the CAZ-AVI group exhibited a generally lower incidence of adverse reactions compared with that in the TGC group.

CONCLUSIONS

CAZ-AVI may be a suitable alternative for TGC in the treatment of critically ill patients with CRKP-induced HAP or VAP. These observations require further confirmation in larger randomized prospective clinical trials.

Contribution of PER-Type and NDM-Type β-Lactamases to Cefiderocol Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii

Cefiderocol (FDC) is a recently developed siderophore cephalosporin showing excellent antibacterial activity against Gram-negative bacteria, including Acinetobacter baumannii. By investigating a series of A. baumannii clinical isolates with elevated MICs of FDC, we showed that PER-like β-lactamases and, to a lesser extent, NDM-like β-lactamases, significantly contributed to reduced susceptibility to that antibiotic. Interestingly, we showed that combination of FDC with avibactam exhibited excellent activity against all multidrug-resistant isolates coproducing OXA-23 and PER-type β-lactamases.

Ceftazidime-avibactam: are we safe from class A carbapenemase producers' infections?

Recently, new combinations of β-lactams and β-lactamase inhibitors became available, including ceftazidime-avibactam, and increased the ability to treat infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). Despite the reduced time of clinical use, isolates expressing resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam have been reported, even during treatment or in patients with no previous contact with this drug. Here, we detailed review data on global ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility, the mechanisms involved in resistance, and the molecular epidemiology of resistant isolates. Ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility remains high (≥ 98.4%) among Enterobacterales worldwide, being lower among extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers and CRE. Alterations in class A β-lactamases are the major mechanism involved in ceftazidime-avibactam resistance, and mutations are mainly, but not exclusively, located in the Ω loop of these enzymes. Modifications in Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) 3 and KPC-2 have been observed by many authors, generating variants with different mutations, insertions, and/or deletions. Among these, the most commonly described is Asp179Tyr, both in KPC-3 (KPC-31 variant) and in KPC-2 (KPC-33 variant). Changes in membrane permeability and overexpression of efflux systems may also be associated with ceftazidime-avibactam resistance. Although several clones have been reported, ST258 with Asp179Tyr deserves special attention. Surveillance studies and rationale use are essential to retaining the activity of this and other antimicrobials against class A CRE.

Evaluation of SuperCAZ/AVI® Medium for Screening Ceftazidime-avibactam Resistant Gram-negative Isolates

The industrial version of SuperCAZ/AVI® medium developed for screening CAZ/AVI resistant Gram-negative isolates has been evaluated here using a collection of 87 well-characterized clinical isolates of worldwide origin. In addition, testing was performed by spiking stools with a series of resistant and susceptible isolates. In those conditions, the SuperCAZ/AVI® medium exhibited a sensitivity and specificity of 100 %, down to the lower limit of detection of 10¹ to 10² CFU/ml. The SuperCAZ/AVI® medium is a sensitive and specific screening medium for detection of CZA-resistant bacteria regardless of their resistance mechanisms.

Assessment of Mortality-Related Risk Factors and Effective Antimicrobial Regimens for Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) attributable to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE-BSIs) are dangerous and a major cause of mortality in clinical settings. This study was therefore designed to define risk factors linked to 30-day mortality in CRE-BSI patients and to examine the relative efficacies of different antimicrobial treatment regimens in affected individuals. Data pertaining to 187 CRE-BSI cases from four teaching hospitals in China collected between January 2018 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. For the 187 patients analyzed in this study, the 30-day mortality of CRE-BSI was 41.7% (78/187). Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that Pitt bacteremia score, immunocompromised status, meropenem MIC of ≥8 mg/liter,absence of source control of infection, and appropriate empirical therapy were independent predictors of CRE-BSI patient 30-day mortality. After controlling for potential confounding factors relative to ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) treatment, combination therapies including CAZ-AVI (odds ratio [OR], 1.287; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.124 to 13.403; P = 0.833) were not related to any significant change in patient mortality risk, whereas the 30-day mortality risk was higher for patients administered other antimicrobial regimens (OR, 12.407; 95% CI, 1.684 to 31.430; P = 0.011). When patients were treated with antimicrobial regimens not containing CAZ-AVI, combination therapy (OR, 0.239; 95% CI, 0.077 to 0.741; P = 0.013) was related to a decreased 30-day mortality risk relative to monotherapy treatment. The mortality-related risk factors and relative antimicrobial regimen efficacy data demonstrated in this study may guide the management of CRE-BSI patients.

Recent strategies for inhibiting multidrug-resistant and β-lactamase producing bacteria: A review

β-lactam antibiotics are one of the most commonly used drugs for treating bacterial infections, but their clinical effectiveness has been severely affected with bacteria developing resistance against their action. Production of β-lactamase enzymes by bacteria that can degrade β-lactams is the most common mechanism of acquiring such resistance, leading to the emergence of multiple-drug resistance in them. Therefore, the development of efficient approaches to combat infections caused by β-lactamase producing and multidrug-resistant bacteria is the need of the hour. The present review attempts to understand such recent strategies that are in line for development as potential alternatives to conventional antibiotics. We find that apart from efforts being made to develop new antibiotics, several other approaches are being explored, which can help tackle infections caused by resistant bacteria. This includes the development of plant-based drugs, antimicrobial peptides, nano-formulations, bacteriophage therapy, use of CRISPR-Cas9, RNA silencing and antibiotic conjugates with nanoparticles of antimicrobial peptides. The mechanism of action of these novel approaches and potential issues limiting their translation from laboratory to clinics is also discussed. The review is important from an interesting knowledge base which can be useful for researchers working in this domain.

Multicenter Evaluation of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on the Vitek 2 System

In this multisite study, Vitek 2 AST-Gram-Negative Ceftazidime/Avibactam test results for 1,073 isolates (866 Enterobacterales and 207 Pseudomonas aeruginosa) were compared to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution (BMD) reference method. The results were analyzed for essential agreement (EA), category agreement (CA), major error rates, and very major error rates following FDA/ISO performance criteria using the FDA-recognized CLSI/EUCAST breakpoints (sensitive [S], ≤8/4 μg/ml; resistant [R], ≥16/4 μg/ml). The overall EA was 94.5% (1,014/1,073) and CA was 98.7% (1,059/1,073). No very major errors were reported. The major error rate was 1.4% (14/998). Out of 14 major errors, 9 were within EA. Based on the EA and lack of an intermediate category for ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), the adjusted major error rate for FDA criteria was 0.5% (5/998). The performance for ISO criteria after error resolutions included EA of 94.5% (1,014/1,073), CA of 98.9% (1,061/1,073), major error of 1.2% (12/998), and no very major error. Vitek 2 met the ISO and FDA criteria of ≥95% reproducibility and ≥95% quality control (QC) results within acceptable ranges for QC organisms. Vitek 2 overall performance for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa met or exceeded the FDA and ISO performance criteria; thus, it is a reliable alternative to the BMD reference method for routine CZA susceptibility testing.

Safety considerations of current drug treatment strategies for nosocomial pneumonia

Introduction: Nosocomial pneumonia unfortunately remains a frequent event for which appropriate antibiotic treatment is central to improving outcomes. Physicians must choose an early and appropriate empirical treatment, basing their decision on the safety profile and possible side effects. Areas covered: In this review, we analyzed the safety profiles of the most common antimicrobials for treating nosocomial pneumonia. Beta-lactams are used most often for these infections, with a high percentage (6% to 25%) of patients reporting allergy or hypersensitivity reactions; however, exhaustive evaluation is key because it seems possible to de-label as many as 90% by proper assessment. Combinations including a beta-lactam are recommended in patients with risk factors for drug-resistant microorganisms and septic shock. Although aminoglycosides are safe for 3-5 days of therapy, renal function should be monitored. Fluoroquinolones must also be used with care given the risk of collagen degradation and cardiovascular events, mainly aneurysm or aortic dissection. Linezolid or vancomycin are both viable for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, but linezolid seems to be the superior option. Antibiotic stewardships programs must be developed for each center. Expert opinion: Choosing the most appropriate antimicrobial based on information from national and international guidelines, local microbiology data, and stewardship programs may reduce the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Daily assessment for the emergence of adverse events related to antimicrobial use is essential.

In Vitro Selective Growth-Inhibitory Activities of Phytochemicals, Synthetic Phytochemical Analogs, and Antibiotics against Diarrheagenic/Probiotic Bacteria and Cancer/Normal Intestinal Cells

A desirable attribute of novel antimicrobial agents for bacterial diarrhea is decreased toxicity toward host intestinal microbiota. In addition, gut dysbiosis is associated with an increased risk of developing intestinal cancer. In this study, the selective growth-inhibitory activities of ten phytochemicals and their synthetic analogs (berberine, bismuth subsalicylate, ferron, 8-hydroxyquinoline, chloroxine, nitroxoline, salicylic acid, sanguinarine, tannic acid, and zinc pyrithione), as well as those of six commercial antibiotics (ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol, metronidazole, tetracycline, and vancomycin) against 21 intestinal pathogenic/probiotic (e.g., Salmonella spp. and bifidobacteria) bacterial strains and three intestinal cancer/normal (Caco-2, HT29, and FHs 74 Int) cell lines were examined in vitro using the broth microdilution method and thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide assay. Chloroxine, ciprofloxacin, nitroxoline, tetracycline, and zinc pyrithione exhibited the most potent selective growth-inhibitory activity against pathogens, whereas 8-hydroxyquinoline, chloroxine, nitroxoline, sanguinarine, and zinc pyrithione exhibited the highest cytotoxic activity against cancer cells. None of the tested antibiotics were cytotoxic to normal cells, whereas 8-hydroxyquinoline and sanguinarine exhibited selective antiproliferative activity against cancer cells. These findings indicate that 8-hydroxyquinoline alkaloids and metal-pyridine derivative complexes are chemical structures derived from plants with potential bioactive properties in terms of selective antibacterial and anticancer activities against diarrheagenic bacteria and intestinal cancer cells.

A Selective Culture Medium for Screening Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The SuperCAZ/AVI medium was developed for screening ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) resistance among Gram-negative bacteria (Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa). It was evaluated using 50 CZA-susceptible and 42 CZA-resistant Gram-negative isolates. Its sensitivity and specificity of detection were 100%. Excellent performance of the medium was also observed by testing spiked stools, with the lower limit of detection ranging from 10¹ to 10² CFU/ml. This screening medium provides the opportunity to detect CZA-resistant isolates regardless of their resistance mechanisms.

ESBLs and resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam combinations in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of the recently launched β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam against ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains.

METHODS

A series of ESBL-encoding genes (blaTEM, blaSHV, blaCTX-M, blaVEB, blaPER, blaGES and blaBEL) was cloned and expressed in E. coli or P. aeruginosa recipient strains. Cultures of E. coli TOP10 harbouring recombinant plasmids and therefore producing the different ESBLs tested were grown in order to perform measurements of catalytic activities, using benzylpenicillin, ceftazidime and ceftolozane as substrates. IC50s were additionally determined for clavulanic acid, tazobactam and avibactam.

RESULTS

We showed here an overall better activity of ceftazidime/avibactam compared with ceftolozane/tazobactam toward ESBL-producing E. coli and P. aeruginosa. Several ESBLs of the GES, PER and BEL types conferred resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam in E. coli and P. aeruginosa. For GES-6 and PER-1 producers, resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam could be explained by a high hydrolysis of ceftolozane and a low activity of tazobactam as an inhibitor. On the other hand, PER-producing P. aeruginosa also exhibited resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam.

CONCLUSIONS

Altogether, the results show that the ESBL PER-1, which is widespread worldwide, may be a source of resistance to both ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam. Excellent activity of ceftazidime/avibactam was highlighted for both ESBL-producing E. coli and ESBL-producing P. aeruginosa.

Clinical and Molecular Epidemiologic Characteristics of Ceftazidime/Avibactam-Resistant Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in China

Background

Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA)-resistant carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections occur in adults worldwide but are rarely observed in neonates. We evaluated the activities of CZA against CRKP and described the clinical and molecular epidemiology of CZA-resistant CRKP in a NICU prior to CZA approval in China.

Methods

A laboratory-based surveillance of CRKP was conducted from July 2017 to June 2018. Clinical data were initially reviewed. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by the broth microdilution method. CZA-resistant CRKP isolates were submitted to carbapenemase types screening and multilocus sequence typing.

Results

Over 23.3% (10/43) of CRKP strains were resistant to CZA, MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ values being 0.5 μg/mL and >32μg/mL, respectively. Most neonates shared similar clinical features with cesarean (n=8), preterm birth (n=6), low birth weight (n=5), and exposure to carbapenems/β-lactam (n=8). All CZA-resistant CRKP isolates were highly resistant to most tested drugs except for polymyxin B (POL) and tigecycline (TGC). CZA-resistant CRKP isolates showed greater sensitivity to amikacin (AMK), nitrofurantoin (NIT), levofloxacin (LVX) and ciprofloxacin (CIP), compared with CZA-sensitive CRKP. All CZA-resistant CRKP isolates harbored carbapenemase genes, bla_kpc-2 (n=5) being predominant, followed by bla_NDM-1 (n=4) and bla_NDM-5 (n=2). Among these CZA-resistant CRKP isolates, a total of eight different STs were identified. CRKP harboring KPC belonged to ST1419, ST37 and ST11, while NDM types were assigned to ST784, ST1710, ST37 and ST324. Furthermore, other β-lactamase genes including bla_SHV and bla_CTX-M were also found.

Conclusion

Over 23.3% of CRKP strains isolated from neonates were resistant to CZA. Cesarean, preterm birth, low birth weight, and exposure to carbapenems/β-lactam were similar clinical features of most neonates with CZA-resistant CRKP. The predominant carbapenemases of CZA-resistant CRKP were KPC-2 and NDM-1, and KPC-2 producing K. pneumoniae assigned into 3 STs, which indicate the genetic diversity of clinical CZA-resistant CRKP isolates.

Development of a selective media for detecting Campylobacter spp. in chicken carcasses using avibactam supplemented mCCDA

Campylobacter spp. are major causes of gastrointestinal infections worldwide, and are commonly identified using modified-charcoal-cefoperazone-deoxycholate agar (mCCDA). However, the efficacy of this screening technique is often hindered by overgrowth of competing flora, such as extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli. Thus, in the present study we supplemented mCCDA with a recently developed ESBL inhibitor, avibactam (A-mCCDA). We inoculated mCCDA and A-mCCDA plates with 25 strains each of Campylobacter spp. and ESBL-producing E. coli, and thereby determined that the optimum avibactam concentration required to inhibit ESBL-producing E. coli was 0.0625 mg/L. At this concentration, a significantly higher proportion of Campylobacter spp. was isolated using A-mCCDA compared to that using mCCDA (P < 0.05). Thus, the results of the present study support the use of A-mCCDA to improve current Campylobacter screening methods.

Potency of Vaborbactam Is Less Affected than That of Avibactam in Strains Producing KPC-2 Mutations That Confer Resistance to Ceftazidime-Avibactam

Resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam due to mutations in KPC genes has been reported both in vitro and in clinical settings. The most frequently reported mutation leads to the amino acid substitution D179Y in the Ω loop of the enzyme. Bacterial cells that carry mutant KPC acquire a higher level of ceftazidime resistance, become more sensitive to other cephalosporins, and almost completely lose resistance to carbapenems. In this study, we demonstrated that two substitutions in KPC-2, D179Y and L169P, reduce the ability of avibactam to enhance the activity of ceftazidime, cefepime, or piperacillin against isogenic efflux-deficient strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 8- to 32-fold and 4- to 16-fold for the D179Y and L169P variants, respectively, depending on the antibiotic.

Resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam due to mutations in KPC genes has been reported both in vitro and in clinical settings. The most frequently reported mutation leads to the amino acid substitution D179Y in the Ω loop of the enzyme. Bacterial cells that carry mutant KPC acquire a higher level of ceftazidime resistance, become more sensitive to other cephalosporins, and almost completely lose resistance to carbapenems. In this study, we demonstrated that two substitutions in KPC-2, D179Y and L169P, reduce the ability of avibactam to enhance the activity of ceftazidime, cefepime, or piperacillin against isogenic efflux-deficient strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 8- to 32-fold and 4- to 16-fold for the D179Y and L169P variants, respectively, depending on the antibiotic. In contrast, the potency of vaborbactam, the structurally unrelated β-lactamase inhibitor that was recently approved by the FDA in combination with meropenem, is reduced no more than 2-fold. Experiments with purified enzymes demonstrate that the D179Y substitution causes an ∼20-fold increase in the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) for inhibition of ceftazidime hydrolysis by avibactam, versus 2-fold for vaborbactam, and that the L169P substitution has an ∼4.5-fold-stronger effect on the affinity for avibactam than for vaborbactam. In addition, the D179Y and L169P variants hydrolyze ceftazidime with 10-fold and 4-fold-higher efficiencies, respectively, than that of wild-type KPC-2. Thus, microbiological and biochemical experiments implicate both decreased ability of avibactam to interact with KPC-2 variants and an increase in the efficiency of ceftazidime hydrolysis in resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam. These substitutions have a considerably lesser effect on interactions with vaborbactam, making the meropenem-vaborbactam combination a valuable agent in managing infections due to KPC-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

Biochemical Activity of Vaborbactam

The most common mechanism of resistance to β-lactams antibiotics in Gram-negative bacteria is production of β-lactamase enzymes capable of cleaving the β-lactam ring. Inhibition of β-lactamase activity with small-molecule drugs is a proven strategy to restore the potency of many β-lactam antibiotics. Vaborbactam (formerly RPX7009) is a cyclic boronic acid β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) with a broad spectrum of activity against various serine β-lactamases, including KPC carbapenemases. The combination of vaborbactam and meropenem is approved in the United States and Europe for the treatment of various nosocomial infections. We attempted to gain more insight into the mechanism of action of vaborbactam by conducting detailed kinetic characterization of its interaction with various recombinant His-tagged β-lactamases. Vaborbactam demonstrated potent inhibition of class A and class C enzymes with K_i values ranging from 0.022 to 0.18 μM, while inhibition of class D enzymes was rather poor, and no activity against class B β-lactamases was detected. Importantly, vaborbactam inhibited KPC-2, KPC-3, BKC-1, and SME-2 carbapenemases at 1:1 stoichiometry, while these numbers were higher for other class A and C enzymes. Vaborbactam was also shown to be a potent progressive inactivator of several enzymes, including KPCs with inactivation constants k ₂/K in the range of 3.4 × 10³ to 2.4 × 10⁴ M^-1 s^-1 Finally, experiments on the recovery of enzyme activity demonstrated the high stability of the vaborbactam-KPC complex, with 0.000040 s^-1 k _off values and a corresponding residence time of 7 h, whereas the release of vaborbactam bound to other serine β-lactamases was substantially faster. The biochemical characteristics of vaborbactam described in this study may facilitate further chemical optimization efforts to develop boronic BLIs with improved affinity and broader spectrum of inhibition.

Considerations and Caveats in Combating ESKAPE Pathogens against Nosocomial Infections

ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) are among the most common opportunistic pathogens in nosocomial infections. ESKAPE pathogens distinguish themselves from normal ones by developing a high level of antibiotic resistance that involves multiple mechanisms. Contemporary therapeutic strategies which are potential options in combating ESKAPE bacteria need further investigation. Herein, a broad overview of the antimicrobial research on ESKAPE pathogens over the past five years is provided with prospective clinical applications.

New Drugs for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Organisms: Time for Stewardship

A gradual rise in drug-resistant trends among Gram-negative organisms, especially carbapenem-resistant (CR) Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), CR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and extensively-drug-resistant (XDR) Acinetobacter baumannii, poses an enormous threat to healthcare systems worldwide. In the last decade, many pharmaceutical companies have devoted enormous resources to the development of new potent antibiotics against XDR Gram-negative pathogens, particularly CRE. Some of these novel antibiotics against CRE strains are β-lactam/β-lactamase-inhibitor combination agents, while others belong to the non-β-lactam class. Most of these antibiotics display good in vitro activity against the producers of Ambler class A, C, and D β-lactamase, although avibactam and vaborbactam are not active in vitro against metallo-β-lactamase (MβL) enzymes. Nevertheless, in vitro efficacy against the producers of some or all class B enzymes (New Delhi MβL, Verona integron-encoded MβL, etc) has been shown with cefepime-zidebactam, aztreonam-avibactam, VNRX-5133, cefiderocol, plazomicin, and eravacycline. As of Feburary 2019, drugs approved for treatment of some CRE-related infections by the US Food and Drug Administration included ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, plazomicin, and eravacycline. Although active against extended-spectrum and AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, delafloxacin does not show in vitro activity against CRE. Murepavadin is shown to be specifically active against CR- and colistin-resistant P. aeruginosa strains. Despite successful development of novel antibiotics, strict implementation of an antibiotic stewardship policy in combination with the use of well-established phenotypic tests and novel multiplex PCR methods for detection of the most commonly encountered β-lactamases/carbapenemases in hospitals is important for prescribing effective antibiotics against CRE and decreasing the resistance burden due to CRE.