Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of gefitinib in patients with lung adenocarcinoma

A Review of Recent Advances in the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Brain Metastasis in Lung Cancer

Brain metastasis from lung cancer is a prevalent mode of treatment failure associated with a poor prognosis. The incidence of brain metastasis has recently shown a dramatic increase. The early detection and risk stratification of lung cancer-related brain metastasis would be highly advantageous for patients. However, our current knowledge and comprehension of the underlying mechanisms driving brain metastasis in lung cancer pose significant challenges. This review summarizes the mechanisms underlying brain metastasis, focusing on the intricate interplay between lung cancer-derived tumor cells and the unique characteristics of the brain, recent advancements in the identification of driver genes, concomitant genes, epigenetic features, including miRNAs and long noncoding RNAs, as well as the molecular characterization of brain metastasis originating from other organs, which may further enhance risk stratification and facilitate precise treatment strategies.

Treatment pattern and outcomes of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in India - a retrospective study

Background

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC), the metastatic spread of cancer to the leptomeninges, is a rare complication and has a dismal prognosis. Due to limited data available on LMC from India, we conducted a country-wise audit of LMC across 15 centres in India.

Methods

The current study conducted in 2020, was a retrospective, multicentric audit of adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with diagnosis of LMC and who received treatment during 2010-2020. Baseline characteristics, details related to previous treatments, cancer sites, LMC diagnosis, treatment pattern and overall survival (OS) were collected. Descriptive statistics were performed, and Kaplan Meier analysis was performed for the estimation of OS.

Findings

Among the patients diagnosed with LMC (n = 84), diagnosis was confirmed in 52 patients (61.9%) and 'probable' in 32 (38.1%) patients. The three most common cause of malignancy were non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer and gastrointestinal cancer with 45 (53.6%), 22 (26.1%) and 9 (10.7%) patients respectively. Intrathecal therapy was offered in 33 patients (39.3%). The most common intrathecal agent was methotrexate in 23 patients (27.4%). The median OS was 90 days (95% CI 48-128). Among tested variables, intrathecal therapy administration (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.36, 95% CI 0.19-0.68) and primary in lung (HR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.23-0.83) had a favourable impact on OS.

Interpretation

Prognosis with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis is poor with a significant burden of morbidity and mortality in India. This data aims to highlight the current outcomes and facilitate further research on LMC.

Funding

None.

Central Nervous System Outcomes of Lazertinib Versus Gefitinib in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC: A LASER301 Subset Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Lazertinib, a third-generation mutant-selective EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, improved progression-free survival compared with gefitinib in the phase 3 LASER301 study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04248829). Here, we report the efficacy of lazertinib and gefitinib in patients with baseline central nervous system (CNS) metastases.

METHODS

Treatment-naive patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC were randomized one-to-one to lazertinib (240 mg/d) or gefitinib (250 mg/d). Patients with asymptomatic or stable CNS metastases were included if any planned radiation, surgery, or steroids were completed more than 2 weeks before randomization. For patients with CNS metastases confirmed at screening or subsequently suspected, CNS imaging was performed every 6 weeks for 18 months, then every 12 weeks. End points assessed by blinded independent central review and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 included intracranial progression-free survival, intracranial objective response rate, and intracranial duration of response.

RESULTS

Of the 393 patients enrolled in LASER301, 86 (lazertinib, n = 45; gefitinib, n = 41) had measurable and or non-measurable baseline CNS metastases. The median intracranial progression-free survival in the lazertinib group was 28.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.8-28.2) versus 8.4 months (95% CI: 6.7-not reached [NR]) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20-0.89, p = 0.02). Among patients with measurable CNS lesions, the intracranial objective response rate was numerically higher with lazertinib (94%; n = 17) versus gefitinib (73%; n = 11, p = 0.124). The median intracranial duration of response with lazertinib was NR (8.3-NR) versus 6.3 months (2.8-NR) with gefitinib. Tolerability was similar to the overall LASER301 population.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CNS metastases, lazertinib significantly improved intracranial progression-free survival compared with gefitinib, with more durable responses.

Successful therapy using high-dose furmonertinib for non-small cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis: a case report and literature review

Background

Lung cancer is the second most common form of malignant tumor and has the highest mortality rate worldwide. Among its subtypes, lung adenocarcinoma is the most prevalent. Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is rare and is characterized by a dismal prognosis, with overall survival periods typically spanning 4 to 6 weeks without treatment. However, in specific cases, survival can be extended to 4 to 6 months with appropriate therapy. The recent approval of third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as osimertinib, aumolertinib, and furmonertinib, has introduced promising treatment options for individuals with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who develop LM after developing resistance to first- and second-generation TKIs. These third-generation TKIs exhibit an enhanced ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB), opening up new avenues for managing this challenging condition.

Case summary

We report the case of a 48-year-old Chinese man diagnosed with advanced NSCLC harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. Following a pulmonary lobectomy and postoperative adjuvant therapy with gefitinib, the patient was diagnosed with LM, which was confirmed by his neurologic symptoms, cerebrospinal fluid cytologic analysis, and cranial enhancement magnetic resonance imaging. Subsequently, he received oral treatment in the form of 160 mg of furmonertinib daily. After 5 days of furmonertinib therapy, the patient recovered from lethargy, with an obvious improvement in cognitive function. Follow-up visits revealed a 6-month survival period following the LM diagnosis. Patients with NSCLC and LM typically present with severe symptoms, and the efficacy of systemic treatment, intrathecal chemotherapy, and radiotherapy remains unsatisfactory. We hope that this specific case provide valuable insights into the management of patients with EGFR mutation-associated NSCLC with LM.

Conclusion

Furmonertinib, a third-generation EGFR TKI with notable BBB penetration, shows promise in LM control and the rapid alleviation of intracranial symptoms. Further investigations into appropriate dosage and toxicity management are imperative.

Efficacy of lazertinib for symptomatic or asymptomatic brain metastases in treatment-naive patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer: Protocol of an open-label, single-arm phase II trial

INTRODUCTION

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation has a higher incidence of brain metastases than wild-type EGFR mutations. Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), targets both EGFR-TKI sensitizing and T790M-resistance mutations and has a higher brain penetration rate relative to first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs. Therefore, osimertinib has become a preferred first-line therapy for advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. However, lazertinib, an emerging EGFR-TKI, has shown higher selectivity toward EGFR mutations and improved penetration of the blood-brain barrier compared to osimertinib in preclinical studies. This trial will evaluate the efficacy of lazertinib as a first-line therapy in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC who have brain metastases, with or without additional local therapy.

METHODS

This is a single-center, open-label, single-arm phase II trial. A total of 75 patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC will be recruited. Eligible patients will receive oral lazertinib 240 mg, once daily until disease progression or intolerable toxicity is detected. Patients with moderate to severe symptoms related to brain metastasis will simultaneously receive local therapy for the brain. The primary endpoints are progression-free survival and intracranial progression-free survival.

DISCUSSION

Lazertinib, in combination with local therapy for the brain, if necessary, is expected to improve the clinical benefit in advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC with brain metastases, as a first-line treatment.

Combination of EGFR-Directed Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) with Radiotherapy in Brain Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A 2010-2019 Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Traditionally, brain metastases have been treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), whole-brain radiation (WBRT), and/or surgical resection. Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), over half of which carry EGFR mutations, are the leading cause of brain metastases. EGFR-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have shown promise in NSCLC; but their utility in NSCLC brain metastases (NSCLCBM) remains unclear. This work sought to investigate whether combining EGFR-TKI with WBRT and/or SRS improves overall survival (OS) in NSCLCBM.

METHODS

A retrospective review of NSCLCBM patients diagnosed during 2010-2019 at a tertiary-care US center was performed and reported following the 'strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology' (STROBE) guidelines. Data regarding socio-demographic and histopathological characteristics, molecular attributes, treatment strategies, and clinical outcomes were collected. Concurrent therapy was defined as the combination of EGFR-TKI and radiotherapy given within 28 days of each other.

RESULTS

A total of 239 patients with EGFR mutations were included. Of these, 32 patients had been treated with WBRT only, 51 patients received SRS only, 36 patients received SRS and WBRT only, 18 were given EGFR-TKI and SRS, and 29 were given EGFR-TKI and WBRT. Median OS for the WBRT-only group was 3.23 months, for SRS + WBRT it was 3.17 months, for EGFR-TKI + WBRT 15.50 months, for SRS only 21.73 months, and for EGFR-TKI + SRS 23.63 months. Multivariable analysis demonstrated significantly higher OS in the SRS-only group (HR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.84, p = 0.017) compared to the WBRT reference group. There were no significant differences in overall survival for the SRS + WBRT combination cohort (HR = 1.30, 95% CI = 0.60, 2.82, p = 0.50), EGFR-TKIs and WBRT combination cohort (HR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.41, 2.08, p = 0.85), or the EGFR-TKI + SRS cohort (HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.20, 1.09, p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

NSCLCBM patients treated with SRS had a significantly higher OS compared to patients treated with WBRT-only. While sample-size limitations and investigator-associated selection bias may limit the generalizability of these results, phase II/III clinicals trials are warranted to investigate synergistic efficacy of EGFR-TKI and SRS.

Determining plasma and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of EGFR-TKI in lung cancer patients

Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are commonly used to treat advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A rapid and reliable method for measuring plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of EGFR-TKIs is needed for therapeutic drug monitoring. By using UHPLC‒MS/MS with multiple reaction monitoring mode, we developed a method for rapidly determining the plasma and CSF concentrations of gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, and osimertinib. Protein precipitation was employed to remove protein interference for plasma and CSF matrix. The LC‒MS/MS assay was validated to be satisfactory in terms of linearity, precision, and accuracy. This method was successfully applied to measure plasma (n = 44) and CSF (n = 6) concentrations of EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC patients. The chromatographic separation was achieved by a Hypersil Gold aQ column within 3 minutes. The median plasma concentrations were 325.76, 1981.50, 42.62, 40.27, and 340.92 ng/ml for gefitinib erlotinib, afatinib 30 mg/day, afatinib 40 mg/day, and osimertinib, respectively. The CSF penetration rates were 2.15% for the patients receiving erlotinib therapy, 0.59% for afatinib, 0.08-1.12% for osimertinib 80 mg/day, and 2.18% for those receiving osimertinib 160 mg/day. This assay helps to predict the effectiveness and toxicities of EGFR-TKIs in the pursuit of precision medicine for lung cancer patients.

Upfront Advanced Radiotherapy and New Drugs for NSCLC Patients with Synchronous Brain Metastases: Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze? A Real-World Analysis from Lombardy, Italy

AIM

Healthcare administrative databases represent a valuable source for real-life data analysis. The primary aim of this study is to compare effectiveness and cost profile in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring synchronous brain metastases (BMs) who received non-chemo first-line systemic therapy with or without advanced radiotherapy (aRT).

METHODS

Diagnostic ICD-9-CM codes were used for identifying all patients with a new diagnosis of lung cancer between 2012 and 2019. Among these, patients who had started a first-line systemic treatment with either TKIs or pembrolizumab, alone or in combination with intensity-modulated or stereotactic RT, were selected. Clinical outcomes investigated included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time-to-treatment failure (TTF). The cost outcome was defined as the average per capita cumulative healthcare direct costs of the treatment, including all inpatient and outpatient costs.

RESULTS

The final cohort included 177 patients, of whom 58 were treated with systemic treatment plus aRT (STRT) and 119 with systemic treatment alone. The addition of aRT to systemic treatment was associated with a significantly better OS (p = 0.020) and PFS (p = 0.041) than systemic therapy alone. The ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) value indicated an average cost of €3792 for each month of survival after STRT treatment and confirmed clinical effectiveness but higher healthcare costs.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study suggests that upfront aRT for NCLSC patients with synchronous BMs represents a valid treatment strategy, boosting the efficacy of novel and emerging drug classes with sustainable costs for the health service.

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE

The present real-world study reports that the use of upfront advanced radiotherapyaRT and new-generation systemic agents, such as TKIs and pembrolizumab, may have higher oncological control and an improved cost-effectiveness profile than the use of new-generation systemic agents alone in NCLSC patients with synchronous brain metastases. Acquired evidence can also be used to inform policymakers that adding advanced radiotherapy results is a sustainable cost for the health service. Since approximately 50% of patients do not meet RCT inclusion criteria, a significant proportion of them is receiving treatment that is not evidence-informed; therefore, these results warrant further studies to identify the best radiotherapy timing and possible dose escalation approaches to improving treatment efficacy in patient subgroups not typically represented in randomized controlled trials.

Therapeutic Monitoring of Orally Administered, Small-Molecule Anticancer Medications with Tumor-Specific Cellular Protein Targets in Peripheral Fluid Spaces-A Review

Orally administered, small-molecule anticancer drugs with tumor-specific cellular protein targets (OACD) have revolutionized oncological pharmacotherapy. Nevertheless, the differences in exposure to these drugs in the systemic circulation and extravascular fluid compartments have led to several cases of therapeutic failure, in addition to posing unknown risks of toxicity. The therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of OACDs in therapeutically relevant peripheral fluid compartments is therefore essential. In this work, the available knowledge regarding exposure to OACD concentrations in these fluid spaces is summarized. A review of the literature was conducted by searching Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science for clinical research articles and case reports published between 10 May 2001 and 31 August 2022. Results show that, to date, penetration into cerebrospinal fluid has been studied especially intensively, in addition to breast milk, leukocytes, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, peritoneal fluid, pleural fluid, saliva and semen. The typical clinical indications of peripheral fluid TDM of OACDs were (1) primary malignancy, (2) secondary malignancy, (3) mental disorder, and (4) the assessment of toxicity. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was most commonly applied for analysis. The TDM of OACDs in therapeutically relevant peripheral fluid spaces is often indispensable for efficient and safe treatments.

[Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment of Leptomeningeal Metastasis of Lung Cancer]

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM), a special type of metastasis in advanced lung cancer, is known for its severe clinical symptoms, rapid progression and poor prognosis. LM used to be featured with low clinical diagnosis rate, limited treatment options, poor treatment efficacy, and very short survival if treatment not given. Though cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology remains to be the gold standard for the diagnosis of LM, the positive rate of the first CSF cytology even in patients with suggestive clinical symptoms and positive imaging generally does not exceed 50%, leading to a delay in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with LM. With the progress of targeted therapy for driver gene-positive lung cancer and immunotherapy for driver gene-negative lung cancer, the overall survival of patients with lung cancer has been prolonged, meanwhile incidence of LM has been increasing year by year. Current clinical research in this field center around how to improve diagnosis rate and to find effective treatment approaches. This paper reviews advances in diagnosis and treatment of LM of lung cancer..
.

A Retrospective Study of Intrathecal Pemetrexed Combined With Systemic Therapy for Leptomeningeal Metastasis of Lung Cancer

Objective This retrospective study aimed to investigate the clinical features of lung cancer patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) and explore the clinical efficacy and tolerance of intrathecal pemetrexed (IP) combined with systemic antitumor therapy. Methods Thirty-four lung cancer patients (11 men, 23 women) with LM receiving IP at our hospital were retrospectively reviewed between August 2018 and December 2019. Identified cases showed either positive cerebrospinal fluid cytology or typical findings (leptomeningeal enhancement or ventricle broadening) upon imaging examination. Results Before the diagnosis of LM, 24 (70.6%) patients received EGFR-TKI therapy with or without other agents (antivascular therapy, or chemotherapy), 5 (14.7%) patients received chemotherapy, 1 (2.9%) patient received antivascular therapy, and 3 (8.8%) patients received ALK inhibitors. Fourteen (41.2%) patients did not change the systematic regimen at the beginning of IP, while 20 (58.8%) patients changed to antitumor agents. IP was administered for a median of 3 times (range, 1-12 times). The IP dose was 15, 20, 25, 30, and 40 mg in 8 (23.5%), 21 (58.8%), 2 (5.9%), 2 (5.9%), and 1 (5.9%) patient, respectively. In all IP dose levels, the major adverse events were myelosuppression and elevation of hepatic aminotransferases (EHA). Grade 1/2 myelosuppression occurred in 4 (11.8%) patients. Grade 1/2 EHA also occurred in 4 (11.8%) patients. Grades 3/4 adverse events were not observed. After IP and systematic therapy, the clinical manifestations related to LM in 26 (76.5%) patients improved. In the whole cohort, the median overall survival was 20 months. The median time from the initial IP administration until death or the last follow-up was 3.5 months. Conclusions IP showed controllable toxicity and good efficacy, prolonged the survival time, and improved the quality of life when combined with tailored systemic antitumor therapy in lung cancer patients.

The Tumor Control According to Radiation Dose of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Small and Medium-Sized Brain Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Objective

The effectiveness of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR) in the treatment of brain metastases is well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of maximizing the radiation dose in GKR and the factors influencing tumor control in cases of small and medium-sized brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

We analyzed 230 metastatic brain tumors less than 5 mL in volume in 146 patients with NSCLC who underwent GKR. The patients had no previous radiation therapy for brain metastases. The pathologies of the tumors were adenocarcinoma (n=207), squamous cell carcinoma (n=18), and others (n=5). The radiation doses were classified as 18, 20, 22, and 24 Gy, and based on the tumor volume, the tumors were categorized as follows : small-sized (less than 1 mL) and medium-sized (1–3 and 3–5 mL). The progression-free survival (PFS) of the individual 230 tumors and 146 brain metastases was evaluated after GKR depending on the pathology, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score (PS), tumor volume, radiation dose, and anti-cancer regimens. The radiotoxicity after GKR was also evaluated.

Results

After GKR, the restricted mean PFS of individual 230 tumors at 24 months was 15.6 months (14.0–17.1). In small-sized tumors, as the dose of radiation increased, the tumor control rates tended to increase (p=0.072). In medium-sized tumors, there was no statistically difference in PFS with an increase of radiation dose (p=0.783). On univariate analyses, a statistically significant increase in PFS was associated with adenocarcinomas (p=0.001), tumors with ECOG PS 0 (p=0.005), small-sized tumors (p=0.003), radiation dose of 24 Gy (p=0.014), synchronous lesions (p=0.002), and targeted therapy (p=0.004). On multivariate analyses, an improved PFS was seen with targeted therapy (hazard ratio, 0.356; 95% confidence interval, 0.150–0.842; p=0.019). After GKR, the restricted mean PFS of brain at 24 months was 9.8 months (8.5–11.1) in 146 patients, and the pattern of recurrence was mostly distant within the brain (66.4%). The small and medium-sized tumors treated with GKR showed radiotoxicitiy in five out of 230 tumors (2.2%), which were controlled with medical treatment.

Conclusion

The small-sized tumors were effectively controlled without symptomatic radiation necrosis as the radiation dose was increased up to 24 Gy. The medium-sized tumors showed potential for symptomatic radiation necrosis without signifcant tumor control rate, when greater than 18 Gy. GKR combined targeted therapy improved the tumor control of GKR-treated tumors.

PLK1 (polo like kinase 1)-dependent autophagy facilitates gefitinib-induced hepatotoxicity by degrading COX6A1 (cytochrome c oxidase subunit 6A1)

Liver dysfunction is an outstanding dose-limiting toxicity of gefitinib, an EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), in the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying gefitinib-induced hepatotoxicity, and provide potentially effective intervention strategy. We discovered that gefitinib could sequentially activate macroautophagy/autophagy and apoptosis in hepatocytes. The inhibition of autophagy alleviated gefitinib-induced apoptosis, whereas the suppression of apoptosis failed to lessen gefitinib-induced autophagy. Moreover, liver-specific Atg7+/- heterozygous mice showed less severe liver injury than vehicle, suggesting that autophagy is involved in the gefitinib-promoted hepatotoxicity. Mechanistically, gefitinib selectively degrades the important anti-apoptosis factor COX6A1 (cytochrome c oxidase subunit 6A1) in the autophagy-lysosome pathway. The gefitinib-induced COX6A1 reduction impairs mitochondrial respiratory chain complex IV (RCC IV) function, which in turn activates apoptosis, hence causing liver injury. Notably, this autophagy-promoted apoptosis is dependent on PLK1 (polo like kinase 1). Both AAV8-mediated Plk1 knockdown and PLK1 inhibitor BI-2536 could mitigate the gefitinib-induced hepatotoxicity in vivo by abrogating the autophagic degradation of the COX6A1 protein. In addition, PLK1 inhibition could not compromise the anti-cancer activity of gefitinib. In conclusion, our findings reveal the gefitinib-hepatotoxicity pathway, wherein autophagy promotes apoptosis through COX6A1 degradation, and highlight pharmacological inhibition of PLK1 as an attractive therapeutic approach toward improving the safety of gefitinib-based cancer therapy.Abbreviations: 3-MA: 3-methyladenine; AAV8: adeno-associated virus serotype 8; ATG5: autophagy related 5; ATG7: autophagy related 7; B2M: beta-2-microglobulin; CCCP: carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone; CHX: cycloheximide; COX6A1: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 6A1; c-PARP: cleaved poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; CQ: chloroquine; GOT1/AST: glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase 1, soluble; GPT/ALT: glutamic pyruvic transaminase, soluble; HBSS: Hanks´ balanced salt solution; H&E: hematoxylin and eosin; MAP1LC3/LC3: microtubule associated proteins 1 light chain 3; PLK1: polo like kinase 1; RCC IV: respiratory chain complex IV; ROS: reactive oxygen species; TUBB8: tubulin beta 8 class VIII.

Brain metastases in patients with oncogenic-driven non-small cell lung cancer: Pros and cons for early radiotherapy

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with oncogenic driver mutations such as EGFR or ALK has a high predilection for brain metastases (BMs) compared to unselected patients. Historically, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was adopted widely for patients with BM. More recently, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a standard approach for patients with 1 - 4 metastatic brain lesions. However, data on overall survival benefit with WBRT/SRS compared to target agents are conflicting, with a significant compromise of loss of neurocognitive function. Newer target agents with improved CNS efficacy have challenged the use of early radiotherapy in NSCLC patients with oncogenic driver mutations. Optimal treatment approach and timing of radiotherapy remain unclear, especially under the various clinical contexts. The purpose of this review is to summarize the available data on the possible benefits and risks of early radiotherapy for oncogenic-driven NSCLC patients with brain metastases. Clinical decisions should consider both intracranial efficacy and patient quality of life, given that patients are surviving long enough to experience the long-term consequences of radiation therapy.

A Phase II Study of Osimertinib for Radiotherapy-Naive Central Nervous System Metastasis From NSCLC: Results for the T790M Cohort of the OCEAN Study (LOGIK1603/WJOG9116L)

OBJECTIVES

Osimertinib has been reported to be effective against central nervous system (CNS) metastasis from activating EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Nevertheless, the true antitumor effects of osimertinib alone for CNS metastasis are unclear because the aforementioned studies included previously irradiated cases, in which tumor shrinkage can occur later owing to the effects of radiotherapy (RT). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of osimertinib against RT-naive CNS metastasis from sensitizing EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

METHODS

The OCEAN study was a two-cohort trial, involving 66 patients (T790M cohort [n = 40] and first-line cohort [n = 26]) with RT-naive CNS metastasis from sensitizing EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. The patients were treated once daily with 80 mg osimertinib. The primary end point was brain metastasis response rate (BMRR) according to the PAREXEL criteria. In this report, we present the results for the T790M cohort with analysis of drug concentrations and plasma circulating tumor DNA.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 69 years, and 30% of them were males. Eight patients (20%) were symptomatic, and most had multiple CNS metastases (78%). Among the eligible 39 patients, the BMRR (PAREXEL criteria), median brain metastasis-related progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival, overall response rate, and median PFS were 66.7% (90% confidence interval: 54.3%-79.1%), 25.2 months, 19.8 months, 40.5%, and 7.1 months, respectively. The BMRR according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria was 70.0% (n = 20). The brain metastasis-related PFS of patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion was significantly longer than that of exon 21 L858R (median = 31.8 versus 8.3 mo; log-rank p = 0.032). The treatment-related pneumonitis was observed in four patients (10%). On or after day 22, the median trough blood and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of osimertinib were 568 nM and 4.10 nM, respectively, and those of its metabolite AZ5104 were 68.0 nM and 0.260 nM, respectively. The median blood to cerebrospinal fluid penetration rates of osimertinib and AZ5104 were 0.79% and 0.53%, respectively. The blood trough concentration at day 22 was not correlated with the efficacy of osimertinib against CNS metastasis. Plasma T790M and C797S mutations were detected in 83% and 3% of the patients before treatment, 11% and 3% of the patients on day 22, and 39% and 22% of the patients at the detection of progressive disease, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study evaluated the efficacy of osimertinib against RT-naive CNS metastasis from T790M-positive NSCLC. The primary end point was met, and the results revealed the efficacy of osimertinib in patients with CNS metastasis harboring EGFR T790M mutations especially for EGFR-sensitizing mutation of exon 19 deletion.

Osimertinib rechallenge under steroid protection following osimertinib-induced pneumonitis: three case studies

Osimertinib is a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor that became the preferred first-line treatment option for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with sensitizing epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. Drug-induced pneumonitis is known to occur with osimertinib. In case of severe pneumonitis, discontinuation of treatment and therapy with corticosteroids is recommended, and a treatment switch is usually performed. We herein report the treatment course in three patients who were rechallenged with osimertinib under steroid protection following an osimertinib-induced pneumonitis. All our patients were initially re-exposed to a lower dose of osimertinib. Two patients were successfully rechallenged under prednisolone protection. The third patient, who was initially retreated with osimertinib without steroid protection, suffered from a recurrent pneumonitis, and was later rechallenged successfully under steroid protection. Our case series indicates that rechallenge with osimertinib following recovery from osimertinib-induced pneumonitis allows a successful rechallenge in individual cases when alternative treatment options are lacking. Concomitant steroids appear to protect against flares of pneumonitis during rechallenge.

The Pharmacokinetics of Gefitinib in a Chinese Cancer Population Group: A Virtual Clinical Trials Population Study

Gefitinib, a selective inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase, is used to treat non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung cancer rates are high in China and are expected to increase over the next decade. CYP 2D6 intermediate metaboliser (IM) phenotypes are more prevalent in the Chinese population compared to Caucasians; the increased risk of drug-drug interactions (DDI) with chemotherapy polypharmacy may lead to different clinical pharmacokinetics outcomes for Chinese patients. This study developed and validated a virtual Chinese cancer population for the pragmatic assessment of gefitinib DDI as a victim drug in Chinese and Caucasian cancer populations. When assessing the impact of 2D6 phenotypes on bupropion mediated CYP 2D6 DDI in Chinese cancer population, we found that AUC increased by at least 60% in extensive metabolizers (EM) and 30% in IM. As a result, fmCYP2D6 was reduced by 15% in IM in the presence of bupropion, translating into > 70% of EM subjects and > 48% of IM subjects with trough concentrations at steady state (Ctrough,ss) below the gefitinib target trough level. The PBPK model predicted that a 500 mg once daily dose in both EM and IM subjects successfully reduced the percent of subjects below the Ctrough,ss. Such changes in Ctrough,ss warrant further investigation and highlight the ability of pharmacokinetic modelling to investigate populations that may be difficult to recruit for traditional clinical studies.

Challenges and Novel Opportunities of Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

Lung cancer is the most common primary malignancy that tends to metastasize to the brain. Owing to improved survival of lung cancer patients, the prevalence of brain metastases is a matter of growing concern. Brain radiotherapy remains the mainstay in the management of metastatic CNS disease. However, new targeted therapies such as the tyrosine kinase or immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated intracranial activity and promising tumor response rates. Here, we review the current and emerging therapeutical strategies for brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer, both brain-directed and systemic, as well as the uncertainties that may arise from their combination.

Abstract

Approximately 20% patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with CNS spread at the time of diagnosis and 25–50% are found to have brain metastases (BMs) during the course of the disease. The improvement in the diagnostic tools and screening, as well as the use of new systemic therapies have contributed to a more precise diagnosis and prolonged survival of lung cancer patients with more time for BMs development. In the past, most of the systemic therapies failed intracranially because of the inability to effectively cross the blood brain barrier. Some of the new targeted therapies, especially the group of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown durable CNS response. However, the use of ionizing radiation remains vital in the management of metastatic brain disease. Although a decrease in CNS-related deaths has been achieved over the past decade, many challenges arise from the need of multiple and repeated brain radiation treatments, which carry along not insignificant risks and toxicity. The combination of stereotactic radiotherapy and systemic treatments in terms of effectiveness and adverse effects, such as radionecrosis, remains a subject of ongoing investigation. This review discusses the challenges of the use of radiation therapy in NSCLC BMs in view of different systemic treatments such as chemotherapy, TKIs and immunotherapy. It also outlines the future perspectives and strategies for personalized BMs management.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Targeted Anticancer Protein Kinase Inhibitors in Routine Clinical Use: A Critical Review

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic response to oral targeted anticancer protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) varies widely between patients, with insufficient efficacy of some of them and unacceptable adverse reactions of others. There are several possible causes for this heterogeneity, such as pharmacokinetic (PK) variability affecting blood concentrations, fluctuating medication adherence, and constitutional or acquired drug resistance of cancer cells. The appropriate management of oncology patients with PKI treatments thus requires concerted efforts to optimize the utilization of these drug agents, which have probably not yet revealed their full potential.

METHODS

An extensive literature review was performed on MEDLINE on the PK, pharmacodynamics, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of PKIs (up to April 2019).

RESULTS

This review provides the criteria for determining PKIs suitable candidates for TDM (eg, availability of analytical methods, observational PK studies, PK-pharmacodynamics relationship analysis, and randomized controlled studies). It reviews the major characteristics and limitations of PKIs, the expected benefits of TDM for cancer patients receiving them, and the prerequisites for the appropriate utilization of TDM. Finally, it discusses various important practical aspects and pitfalls of TDM for supporting better implementation in the field of cancer treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Adaptation of PKIs dosage regimens at the individual patient level, through a rational TDM approach, could prevent oncology patients from being exposed to ineffective or unnecessarily toxic drug concentrations in the era of personalized medicine.

A real-world study in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with de novo brain metastasis

Brain metastases are the major cause of life-expectancy shortened for patients with lung cancer. The prognostic value of EGFR mutation subtypes and survival benefit of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with de novo brain metastasis is still not clear. Here, we present a real-world study nation-wide focusing on the prognostic value of genomic and therapeutic factors in overall survival (OS) of those patients. We enrolled a total of 233 patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC and de novo BM from multi-medical centers across China. The enrolled patients were divided into 4 groups, including EGFR 19del, EGFR L858R, EGFR wild-type, and EGFR unknown groups. The median OS of patients with EGFR mutations and all patients were 29.0 and 25.0 months, respectively. There was significant difference in OS of patients among EGFR 19del (n=76), EGFR L858R (n=94), EGFR wild-type (n=46) and EGFR unknown (n=17) groups (30.5 vs 27.5 vs 16.0 vs 25.0, P=0.025). Patients treated by icotinib showed better OS than gefitinib and erlotinib (31.0 vs 25.5 vs 26.5, P=0.02). There was a difference in OS of patients received the whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), or WBRT+SRS (20.0 vs 31.0 vs 30.0 months, P<0.001), respectively. In multivariate analysis, patients treated with icotinib had superior iPFS benefit than gefitinib and erlotinib (HR=0.86[95%CI (0.74-1.0)], P=0.04). Besides, the histology of non-adenocarcinomas, the number of BM (>3), and extracranial metastases status could have an independent negative impact on the OS of all patients (P<0.001). EGFR mutant NSCLC patients with de novo BM had a better OS than patients with EGFR wild type. Patients treated with icotinib had longer iPFS than gefitinib and erlotinib but not in OS. Non-adenocarcinomas, number of BM (>3) and extracranial metastases were independent negative prognostic factors in iPFS and OS of all patients. Prospective clinical trials are warranted to explore more effective multimodality in this population.

Crosstalk between alveolar macrophages and alveolar epithelial cells/fibroblasts contributes to the pulmonary toxicity of gefitinib

Gefitinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic or advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors have specific EGFR mutations. Pulmonary toxicity is one of the fatal adverse effects of gefitinib and the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here we demonstrated that alveolar macrophages contributed to gefitinib-induced pulmonary toxicity through promoting alveolar epithelial cells to undergo epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and inducing activation and antiapoptotic effect in fibroblasts. Further, we found that alveolar macrophage-secreted MCP-1 worked as a key factor in the pathologic changes of these two cell types. Gefitinib increased Mcp-1 transcription level via the nuclear import of the transcription factor STAT3. In conclusion, our data uncovered the underlying mechanisms of macrophage-promoted pulmonary toxicity in the presence of gefitinib. MCP-1 antibody or inhibition of STAT3 activation may represent novel therapeutic strategies for preventing gefitinib-induced pulmonary toxicity.

Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Can Improve the Survival of Patients with Multiple Brain Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Objective

To observe whether whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) can bring survival benefits to patients with multiple brain metastases (BM) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and determine the best time for WBRT intervention.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 148 patients diagnosed with EGFR gene-mutated NSCLC. All patients had multiple BM and received EGFR-TKI targeted therapy, which was performed to observe whether WBRT can bring survival benefits, and whether the choice of WBRT timing affects the survival of patients.

Results

Among the 148 patients with NSCLC treated with EGFR-TKI, 76 received WBRT; 72 were without WBRT. WBRT can reduce the intracranial progression rate in the patients (19.7% vs 33.3%, P=0.040), thus improving the intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) (median iPFS: 11.9 months versus 10.2 months, P=0.039) and overall survival (OS) (median OS: 21.0 months versus 16.7 months, P=0.043). Multivariate analysis showed that WBRT (HR=0.606; 95% CI: 0.403-0.912, P=0.016) and the low Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (HR=1.884; 95% CI: 1.120-3.170, P=0.017) are independent prognostic factors in all patients. Further subgroup analysis showed that the choice of WBRT time had no effect on patient survival.

Conclusion

WBRT can improve the survival of patients with multiple BM from NSCLC receiving EGFR-TKI targeted therapy and is an independent prognostic factor. The choice of RT time has no effect on patient survival.

Osimertinib Quantitative and Gene Variation Analyses in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Plasma of a Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patient with Leptomeningeal Metastases

BACKGROUND

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are much more frequent in patients of non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFRTKI) shows promising efficacy for LM.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze the concentration of osimertinib and gene variation of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in human plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Furthermore, we explored whether ctDNA in CSF might be used as a biomarker to predict and monitor therapeutic responses.

METHODS

The dynamic paired CSF and blood samples were collected from the NSCLC patient with LM acquired EGFR-TKI resistance. A method based on ultra-high performance liquid chromatography- tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) was developed and validated for detecting osimertinib in CSF and plasma samples. Gene variations of ctDNA were tested by next-generation sequencing with a panel of 1021 genes.

RESULTS

The concentrations of osimertinib in CSF were significantly lower than that in plasma (penetration rate was 1.47%). Mutations included mTOR, EGFR, CHECK1, ABCC11, and TP53 were explored in ctDNA from plasma and CSF samples. The detected mutation rate of CSF samples was higher than that of plasma samples (50% vs. 25%). Our data further revealed that the variations allele frequency (VAF) and molecular tumor burden index (mTBI) of ctDNA derived from CSF exhibited the negative correlation with efficacy of treatment.

CONCLUSION

ctDNA from CSF might be a useful biomarker for monitoring the efficacy of treatment and an effective complement to nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for LM.

Management of brain metastases according to molecular subtypes

The incidence of brain metastases has markedly increased in the past 20 years owing to progress in the treatment of malignant solid tumours, earlier diagnosis by MRI and an ageing population. Although local therapies remain the mainstay of treatment for many patients with brain metastases, a growing number of systemic options are now available and/or are under active investigation. HER2-targeted therapies (lapatinib, neratinib, tucatinib and trastuzumab emtansine), alone or in combination, yield a number of intracranial responses in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases. New inhibitors are being investigated in brain metastases from ER-positive or triple-negative breast cancer. Several generations of EGFR and ALK inhibitors have shown activity on brain metastases from EGFR and ALK mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) hold promise in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer without druggable mutations and in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The survival of patients with brain metastases from melanoma has substantially improved after the advent of BRAF inhibitors and ICIs (ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab). The combination of targeted agents or ICIs with stereotactic radiosurgery could further improve the response rates and survival but the risk of radiation necrosis should be monitored. Advanced neuroimaging and liquid biopsy will hopefully improve response evaluation.

Barriers and opportunities for the clinical implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring in oncology

There are few fields of medicine in which the individualisation of medicines is more important than in the area of oncology. Under-dosing can have significant ramifications due to the potential for therapeutic failure and cancer progression; by contrast, over-dosing may lead to severe treatment-limiting side effects, such as agranulocytosis and neutropenia. Both circumstances lead to poor patient prognosis and contribute to the high mortality rates still seen in oncology. The concept of dose individualisation tailors dosing for each individual patient to ensure optimal drug exposure and best clinical outcomes. While the value of this strategy is well recognised, it has seen little translation to clinical application. However, it is important to recognise that the clinical setting of oncology is unlike that for which therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is currently the cornerstone of therapy (e.g. antimicrobials). Whilst there is much to learn from these established TDM settings, the challenges presented in the treatment of cancer must be considered to ensure the implementation of TDM in clinical practice. Recent advancements in a range of scientific disciplines have the capacity to address the current system limitations and significantly enhance the use of anticancer medicines to improve patient health. This review examines opportunities presented by these innovative scientific methodologies, specifically sampling strategies, bioanalytics and dosing decision support, to enable optimal practice and facilitate the clinical implementation of TDM in oncology.

Outcomes according to initial and subsequent therapies following intracranial progression in patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer and brain metastasis

In patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases, it remains controversial whether the use of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) alone without radiotherapy (RT) is an optimal approach. Here, we investigated the clinical outcomes according to the use of upfront RT as well as the subsequent therapy following intracranial progression. This single-centre retrospective study included a total of 173 patients who were treated with EGFR-TKI alone (TKI alone group) or with upfront whole-brain RT (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) followed by EGFR-TKI (RT plus TKI group). Clinical outcomes according to initial and subsequent therapies following intracranial progression were analysed. There was no significant difference in OS according to the use of upfront RT (TKI alone group, 24.5 months vs. WBRT group, 20.0 months vs. SRS group, 17.8 months; P = 0.186). Intracranial progression was found in 35 (32.7%) of 107 patients in the TKI alone group. Among them, 19 patients who received salvage RT had the better prognosis than others [median overall survival (OS); 28.6 vs. 11.2 months; P = 0.041]. In the RT plus TKI group, 12 (18.1%) of the 66 patients experienced intracranial progression and 3 of them received salvage RT (median OS; 37.4 vs. 20.0 months; P = 0.044). In multivariate analysis, upfront WBRT was associated with trends towards a lower probability of intracranial progression, whereas upfront SRS was found to be an independent risk factor for poor OS. In conclusion, using EGFR-TKI alone for brain metastasis in EGFR-mutant lung cancer patients showed outcomes comparable to those using upfront RT followed by EGFR-TKI. Patients who could not receive salvage RT following intracranial progression had the worst survival regardless of the type of initial treatment.

Management of CNS metastases in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are a frequent and severe complication associated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The first- and second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown considerable efficacy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. However, their limited potential to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) renders them less effective in the management of CNS metastases in NSCLC. Osimertinib, a third-generation irreversible EGFR-TKI with good potential to cross the BBB, has shown significant clinical activity and acceptable safety profile in patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC brain and leptomeningeal metastases. The progression-free survival (PFS) of up to 15.2 months in CNS metastases patients in the FLAURA trial and the CNS objective response rates (ORRs) of 54% and 43% in the AURA/AURA2 and BLOOM trials, respectively, have established the role of osimertinib in patients with NSCLC with CNS metastases. The AURA3 trial also reported a PFS of 8.5 months and overall ORR of 71%. These data have supported osimertinib to be recognized as a "preferred" first-line treatment for EGFR-positive metastatic NSCLC by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). With limited treatment options available, upfront administration of osimertinib in patients with NSCLC irrespective of EGFR T790M and CNS metastases may improve the overall response rate and potentially reduce the adverse effects of radiotherapy. Our review focuses on the management of EGFR-mutated NSCLC CNS metastases in the context of recent NCCN guidelines.

Osimertinib Overcomes Alectinib Resistance Caused by Amphiregulin in a Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis Model of ALK-Rearranged Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) occurs frequently in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged NSCLC and develops acquired resistance to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK TKIs). This study aimed to clarify the resistance mechanism to alectinib, a second-generation ALK TKI, in LMC and test a novel therapeutic strategy.

METHODS

We induced alectinib resistance in an LMC mouse model with ALK-rearranged NSCLC cell line, A925LPE3, by continuous oral alectinib treatment, established A925L/AR cells. Resistance mechanisms were analyzed using several assays, including Western blot and receptor tyrosine kinase array. We also measured amphiregulin (AREG) concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC with alectinib-refractory LMC by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

A925L/AR cells were moderately resistant to various ALK TKIs, such as alectinib, crizotinib, ceritinib, and lorlatinib, compared with parental cells in vitro. A925L/AR cells acquired the resistance by EGFR activation resulting from AREG overexpression caused by decreased expression of microRNA-449a. EGFR TKIs and anti-EGFR antibody resensitized A925L/AR cells to alectinib in vitro. In the LMC model with A925L/AR cells, combined treatment with alectinib and EGFR TKIs, such as erlotinib and osimertinib, successfully controlled progression of LMC. Mass spectrometry imaging showed accumulation of the EGFR TKIs in the tumor lesions. Moreover, notably higher AREG levels were detected in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with alectinib-resistant ALK-rearranged NSCLC with LMC (n = 4), compared with patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC with EGFR TKI-resistant LMC (n = 30), or patients without LMC (n = 24).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate the potential of novel therapies targeting both ALK and EGFR for the treatment of ALK TKI-resistant LMC in ALK-rearranged NSCLC.

Brain MRI imaging characteristics predict treatment response and outcome in patients with de novo brain metastasis of EGFR-mutated NSCLC

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and de novo brain metastasis (BM) have poor prognosis. We aim to investigate the characteristic of brain magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and the association with the treatment response of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) for lung cancer with BM.EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with BM from October 2013 to December 2017 in a tertiary referral center were retrospectively analyzed. Patient's age, sex, cell type, EGFR mutation status, treatment, and characteristics of BM were collected. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method. The efficacy of different EGFR-TKIs were also analyzed.Among the 257 eligible patients, 144 patients with Exon 19 deletion or Exon 21 L858R were included for analysis. The erlotinib group had the best progression free survival (PFS) (median PFS 13 months, P = .04). The overall survival (OS) revealed no significant difference between three EGFR-TKI groups. Brain MR imaging features including tumor necrosis, rim enhancement and specific tumor locations (frontal lobe, putamen or cerebellum) were factors associated with poor prognosis. Patients with poor prognostic imaging features, the high-risk group, who received erlotinib had the best PFS (median PFS 12 months, P < .001). However, the OS revealed no significant difference between 3 EGFR-TKI groups. The low risk group patients had similar PFS and OS treated with three different EGFR-TKIs.In NSCLC patients with common EGFR mutation and de novo BM, those with poor prognostic brain MR characteristics, erlotinib provided better PFS than afatinib or gefitinib.

Real-World Data on Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases

Background: With the wide application of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), the survival of EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastasis (BM) has been significantly improved. However, prognosis analysis for patients with EGFR mutation and BM is still lacking, and the prognostic factors remain to be determined. Materials and methods: A total of 746 NSCLC patients with BM were identified between January 2013 and December 2016 at our institution. Overall, 261 patients harboring EGFR mutation and meeting the inclusion criteria for the study were enrolled. Exclusion criteria included KPS<50, diagnosed with BM during treatment with EGFR-TKIs, or insufficient follow-up. Overall survival (OS) was measured from the date of brain metastases. Independent prognostic factors were confirmed using a Cox regression model. Results: The median follow-up time for these patients was 32.7 months (95% CI, 23.5-41.9). The median OS after development of brain metastases was 23.0 months (95% CI, 20.01-25.99). By univariate analysis, significantly shorter OS was noted in patients older than 65 years (p=0.025), KPS <70 (p=0.003), presence of extracranial metastases (ECM) (p=0.00), without intracranial local treatment (p=0.000), and without chemotherapy (p=0.001). There was no difference in OS with respect to EGFR mutation type and number of BM (p=0.343, p=0.729, respectively). The Cox proportional hazards regression model revealed that performance status (KPS<70, p=0.010), ECM (p=0.001), receiving intracranial local treatment (p=0.005) and chemotherapy (p=0.005) were independent prognostic factors for OS, while age was not (p=0.087). Patients with higher diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA) and Lung-molGPA scores corresponded to better prognosis (p=0.000). Conclusion: This retrospective analysis demonstrated that performance status (KPS≥70), absence of ECM metastases, administration of local treatment and chemotherapy were associated with superior OS in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who developed BM. The DS-GPA and Lung-molGPA indexes still applied to NSCLC patients with mutant genotypes and BM.

Multidisciplinary expert opinion on the treatment consensus for patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC with brain metastases

The presence of an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is associated with higher incidence of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, patients with synchronous brain metastases at diagnosis have generally been excluded from clinical trials. As there is limited clinical evidence for managing this patient population, a multidisciplinary group of Spanish medical and radiation oncologists, and neuro-oncologist with expertise treating brain metastases in lung cancer patients met with the aim of reaching and developing an expert opinion consensus on the management of patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC with brain metastases. This consensus contains 26 recommendations and 20 conclusion statements across 21 questions in 7 areas, as well as a first-line treatment algorithm.

Difference in central nerve system metastasis during gefitinib or erlotinib therapy in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

Background

Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis is a poor prognostic factor in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation EGFR-mutant NSCLC and is associated with a deteriorated quality of life (QOL). Some clinical studies have suggested a possible difference in the incidence of CNS metastasis between EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients treated with gefitinib and erlotinib, both of which are classified as first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, the difference in the incidence of CNS metastasis between patients receiving these two drugs has not yet been sufficiently well investigated. We analyzed the frequency of occurrence/progression of CNS metastasis in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients treated with erlotinib and gefitinib as the first-line treatment.

Methods

We analyzed the incidence of CNS metastasis, frequency of progression of CNS metastasis and the treatment outcomes in EGFR-mutant patients who received gefitinib or erlotinib as the first-line EGFR-TKI treatment. CNS progressive disease (PD) was defined as progression of CNS metastasis during EGFR-TKI treatment. We also evaluated the progression-free survival (PFS), CNS-PFS, and overall survival (OS) of the patients who received each of the two drugs.

Results

A total of 170 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 144 had received gefitinib, and 26 had received erlotinib. The frequency of CNS PD in the erlotinib group tended to be lower than that in the gefitinib group (11.5% vs. 29.9%, P=0.06). In patients with no existing CNS metastasis at the start of the EGFR-TKI treatments, the incidence of CNS PD was significantly lower in the erlotinib group than that in the gefitinib group (4.8% vs. 24.5%, P=0.04). A re-biopsy after failure of EGFR-TKI treatment was performed in 48 patients. The incidence of EGFR T790M tended to be higher among patients with CNS PD than in those without CNS PD, although the difference was not statistically significant (66.7% vs. 40.4%; P=0.23).

Conclusions

The incidence of progression of CNS metastasis during erlotinib treatment was lower than that during gefitinib treatment. In addition, the difference in the incidence in patients without existing CNS metastasis at the time of start of EGFR-TKI treatment was significantly lower in the patients treated with erlotinib than in those treated with gefitinib.

Afatinib in the first-line treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: clinical evidence and experience

Epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) gene mutations identify a molecularly defined subset of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who display an excellent sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). First-generation reversible EGFR TKIs, gefitinib and erlotinib have been proven to improve the objective response rate and to prolong the progression-free survival compared with standard chemotherapy in large phase III trials. Unfortunately, virtually all patients develop resistance to treatment, usually within 9-12 months. Afatinib is an irreversible ErbB family inhibitor initially designed to overcome the development of resistance. Compared with gefitinib in a first-line setting, afatinib prolonged progression-free survival and time to treatment failure, without impacting on overall survival in the general population of EGFR-mutant patients. However, afatinib has been shown to prolong overall survival in the subset of patients with an EGFR exon 19 deletion compared with chemotherapy. The aim of this review is to summarize the clinical evidence available to date and to critically discuss the place in therapy of afatinib in the rapidly expanding landscape of EGFR-mutant NSCLC first-line therapy.

Emerging Gene Fusion Drivers in Primary and Metastatic Central Nervous System Malignancies: A Review of Available Evidence for Systemic Targeted Therapies

Primary and metastatic tumors of the central nervous system present a difficult clinical challenge, and they are a common cause of disease progression and death. For most patients, treatment consists primarily of surgery and/or radiotherapy. In recent years, systemic therapies have become available or are under investigation for patients whose tumors are driven by specific genetic alterations, and some of these targeted treatments have been associated with dramatic improvements in extracranial and intracranial disease control and survival. However, the success of other systemic therapies has been hindered by inadequate penetration of the drug into the brain parenchyma. Advances in molecular characterization of oncogenic drivers have led to the identification of new gene fusions driving oncogenesis in some of the most common sources of intracranial tumors. Systemic therapies targeting many of these alterations have been approved recently or are in clinical development, and the ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier is now widely recognized as an important property of such drugs. We review this rapidly advancing field with a focus on recently uncovered gene fusions and brain-penetrant systemic therapies targeting them.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Driver gene fusions involving receptor tyrosine kinases have been identified across a wide range of tumor types, including primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors and extracranial solid tumors that are associated with high rates of metastasis to the CNS (e.g., lung, breast, melanoma). This review discusses the systemic therapies that target emerging gene fusions, with a focus on brain-penetrant agents that will target the intracranial disease and, where present, also extracranial disease.

Mechanisms and Therapy for Cancer Metastasis to the Brain

Advances in chemotherapy and targeted therapies have improved survival in cancer patients with an increase of the incidence of newly diagnosed brain metastases (BMs). Intracranial metastases are symptomatic in 60–70% of patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium is more sensitive than computed tomography and advanced neuroimaging techniques have been increasingly used in the detection, treatment planning, and follow-up of BM. Apart from the morphological analysis, the most effective tool for characterizing BM is immunohistochemistry. Molecular alterations not always reflect those of the primary tumor. More sophisticated methods of tumor analysis detecting circulating biomarkers in fluids (liquid biopsy), including circulating DNA, circulating tumor cells, and extracellular vesicles, containing tumor DNA and macromolecules (microRNA), have shown promise regarding tumor treatment response and progression. The choice of therapeutic approaches is guided by prognostic scores (Recursive Partitioning Analysis and diagnostic-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment-DS-GPA). The survival benefit of surgical resection seems limited to the subgroup of patients with controlled systemic disease and good performance status. Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) can be a complication, especially in posterior fossa metastases undergoing a “piecemeal” resection. Radiosurgery of the resection cavity may offer comparable survival and local control as postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). WBRT alone is now the treatment of choice only for patients with single or multiple BMs not amenable to surgery or radiosurgery, or with poor prognostic factors. To reduce the neurocognitive sequelae of WBRT intensity modulated radiotherapy with hippocampal sparing, and pharmacological approaches (memantine and donepezil) have been investigated. In the last decade, a multitude of molecular abnormalities have been discovered. Approximately 33% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors and epidermal growth factor receptor mutations develop BMs, which are targetable with different generations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs: gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, icotinib, and osimertinib). Other “druggable” alterations seen in up to 5% of NSCLC patients are the rearrangements of the “anaplastic lymphoma kinase” gene TKI (crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib). In human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, breast cancer targeted therapies have been widely used (trastuzumab, trastuzumab-emtansine, lapatinib-capecitabine, and neratinib). Novel targeted and immunotherapeutic agents have also revolutionized the systemic management of melanoma (ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and BRAF inhibitors dabrafenib and vemurafenib).

Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

We systematically reviewed the literature for trials addressing the efficacy of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with a curative intent.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing PCI to no PCI in patients with NSCLC treated with a curative intent were eligible for inclusion. We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and CENTRAL between 1946 and July 2016. We also received continual search alerts from PubMed through September 2017. Search terms included "non-small-cell lung carcinoma," "cranial irradiation," and "randomized controlled trials." We conducted meta-analyses using random-effects models for relative measures of treatment effect for the incidence of brain metastasis, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). We used Parmar's methodology to derive hazard ratios (HR) when not explicitly stated in RCTs. We narratively synthesized data for the impact of PCI on quality of life (QoL) and neurocognitive function (NCF). We assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology.

RESULTS

Out of 3,548 citations captured by the search strategy, we retained 8 papers and 1 abstract, reporting on 6 eligible trials. Patients who received PCI had a significant reduction in the risk of developing brain metastases as compared with patients who did not [relative risk (RR) = 0.37; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.26-0.52; moderate quality evidence]. However, there was no OS benefit (HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.90-1.31; moderate quality evidence). Sensitivity analysis excluding older studies did not show substantively different findings. DFS was reported in the two most recent trials that included only stage III patients. There was significant improvement in DFS with PCI (HR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.46-0.98; high quality evidence). Two studies that reported on QoL reported no statistically significant differences. There was no significant difference in NCF decline in the only study that reported on this outcome, except in immediate and delayed recall, as assessed by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test.

CONCLUSION

There is moderate quality evidence that the use of PCI in patients with NSCLC decreases the risk of brain metastases, but does not provide an OS benefit. However, data limited to stage III patients suggests that PCI improves DFS, with no effect on QoL.

FDA Benefit-Risk Assessment of Osimertinib for the Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor T790M Mutation

On March 30, 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved osimertinib for the treatment of patients with metastatic, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation-positive, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as detected by an FDA-approved test, whose disease has progressed following EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Approval was based on demonstration of a statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) when comparing osimertinib with chemotherapy in an international, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial (AURA3). In this confirmatory trial, which enrolled 419 patients, the PFS hazard ratio for osimertinib compared with chemotherapy per investigator assessment was 0.30 (95% confidence interval 0.23-0.41), p < .001, with median PFS of 10.1 months in the osimertinib arm and 4.4 months in the chemotherapy arm. Supportive efficacy data included PFS per blinded independent review committee demonstrating similar PFS results and an improved confirmed objective response rate per investigator assessment of 65% and 29%, with estimated median durations of response of 11.0 months and 4.2 months, in the osimertinib and chemotherapy arms, respectively. Patients received osimertinib 80 mg once daily and had a median duration of exposure of 8 months. The toxicity profile of osimertinib compared favorably with the profile of other approved EGFR TKIs and chemotherapy. The most common adverse drug reactions (>20%) in patients treated with osimertinib were diarrhea, rash, dry skin, nail toxicity, and fatigue. Herein, we review the benefit-risk assessment of osimertinib that led to regular approval, for patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR TKI whose disease has progressed on or after EGFR TKI therapy.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Osimertinib administered to metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring an EGFR T790M mutation, who have progressed on or following EGFR TKI therapy, demonstrated a substantial improvement over platinum-based doublet chemotherapy as well as durable intracranial responses. The ability to test for the T790M mutation in plasma using the FDA-approved cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2 (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) identifies patients with NSCLC tumors not amenable to biopsy. Since a 40% false-negative rate has been observed with the circulating tumor DNA test, re-evaluation of the feasibility of tissue biopsy is recommended to identify patients with a false-negative plasma test result who may benefit from osimertinib.

Response to afatinib in treatment-naïve patients with advanced mutant epidermal growth factor receptor lung adenocarcinoma with brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases are observable in 20-40% of non-small cell lung cancer patients, but standard treatments for such metastases may be intolerable to some. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were found to be effective against mutant-EGFR lung adenocarcinomas, but data regarding their effectiveness, especially for the second-generation EGFR-TKI afatinib, is limited. This study compared key outcomes for afatanib monotherapy versus afatinib combined with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in treatment-naïve lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring EGFR mutations.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 28 brain metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients treated between June 2014 and December 2016 was conducted; 17 were treated with WBRT and maintenance afatinib therapy, while 11 received afatinib monotherapy.

RESULTS

The patients were predominantly female (n = 17, 60.7%) and non-smokers (78.6%). Almost all the patients (89.3%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. The EGFR mutation type consisted of the del19 mutation in 57.1% of the patients (n = 16), while L858R mutations were found in 42.9% (n = 12). The mean number of brain metastases (6.1 ± 5.0) was higher among the patients treated with afatinib monotherapy, while the mean size of the largest brain metastasis (19.0 ± 10.5mm) was greater in the afatinib combined with WBRT group. The objective response rates for the afatinib monotherapy and combination therapy groups were 81.8% and 88.2%, respectively. However, the monotherapy group exhibited a significantly higher complete response rate for intracranial lesions (63.6% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.02), and there were no significant differences between the two treatment groups in overall survival or time to treatment failure.

CONCLUSION

Afatinib can provide therapeutic efficacy and a good response rate in treatment-naïve mutant-EGFR lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastases regardless of whether or not they also receive radiotherapy.

Bevacizumab and gefitinib enhanced whole-brain radiation therapy for brain metastases due to non-small-cell lung cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who experience brain metastases are usually associated with poor prognostic outcomes. This retrospective study proposed to assess whether bevacizumab or gefitinib can be used to improve the effectiveness of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in managing patients with brain metastases. A total of 218 NSCLC patients with multiple brain metastases were retrospectively included in this study and were randomly allocated to bevacizumab-gefitinib-WBRT group (n=76), gefitinib-WBRT group (n=77) and WBRT group (n=75). Then, tumor responses were evaluated every 2 months based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0. Karnofsky performance status and neurologic examination were documented every 6 months after the treatment. Compared to the standard WBRT, bevacizumab and gefitinib could significantly enhance response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) of WBRT (P<0.001). At the same time, RR and DCR of patients who received bevacizumab-gefitinib-WBRT were higher than those who received gefitinib-WBRT. The overall survival (OS) rates and progression-free survival (PFS) rates also differed significantly among the bevacizumab-gefitinib-WBRT (48.6 and 29.8%), gefitinib-WBRT (36.7 and 29.6%) and WBRT (9.8 and 14.6%) groups (P<0.05). Although bevacizumab-gefitinib-WBRT was slightly more toxic than gefitinib-WBRT, the toxicity was tolerable. As suggested by prolonged PFS and OS status, bevacizumab substantially improved the overall efficacy of WBRT in the management of patients with NSCLC.

Understanding and targeting resistance mechanisms in NSCLC

The expanding spectrum of both established and candidate oncogenic driver mutations identified in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), coupled with the increasing number of clinically available signal transduction pathway inhibitors targeting these driver mutations, offers a tremendous opportunity to enhance patient outcomes. Despite these molecular advances, advanced-stage NSCLC remains largely incurable due to therapeutic resistance. In this Review, we discuss alterations in the targeted oncogene ('on-target' resistance) and in other downstream and parallel pathways ('off-target' resistance) leading to resistance to targeted therapies in NSCLC, and we provide an overview of the current understanding of the bidirectional interactions with the tumour microenvironment that promote therapeutic resistance. We highlight common mechanistic themes underpinning resistance to targeted therapies that are shared by NSCLC subtypes, including those with oncogenic alterations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), ROS1 proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1), serine/threonine-protein kinase b-raf (BRAF) and other less established oncoproteins. Finally, we discuss how understanding these themes can inform therapeutic strategies, including combination therapy approaches, and overcome the challenge of tumour heterogeneity.

Prolonged survival of patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with solitary brain metastases treated with surgical resection of brain and lung lesions followed by EGFR TKIs

BACKGROUND

The standard combination of initial and subsequent treatments of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with solitary brain metastases (BM) remain unclear. Thus, the management options and the progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall survival (OS) of EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with solitary BM were investigated in the study.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data from NSCLC patients who harbored EGFR mutations and who presented solitary BM at diagnosis in our institute between 2012 and 2014. PFS and OS were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared using log-rank tests.

RESULTS

In total, 36 NSCLC patients with solitary BM who harbored EGFR mutations were enrolled in this study. The PFS and OS of these patients was 12.4 and 19.3 months, respectively. Sixteen patients underwent surgical resection of brain and lung lesions followed by EGFR-TKIs treatment, and the median OS was 28.0 months, which was significantly longer than 16.4 months of 14 patients received radiotherapy combined with or followed by EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and 15.8 months of 6 patients received radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy. The median PFS also showed the same trend in each group (16.1, 10.4, and 9.8 months, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The survival was extended in the patients receiving surgical resection of brain and lung lesions followed by EGFR-TKIs treatment, and surgery combined with EGFR-TKIs could be a recommended treatment for EGFR mutated NSCLC patients with solitary BM.

Detection of Driver and Resistance Mutations in Leptomeningeal Metastases of NSCLC by Next-Generation Sequencing of Cerebrospinal Fluid Circulating Tumor Cells

Purpose: Leptomeningeal metastases are more common in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations. The diagnosis is difficult by traditional imaging only, and leads to poor understanding of resistance mechanisms of leptomeningeal metastases.Experimental Design: We compared the CellSearch Assay, the Thinprep cytologic test (TCT), and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 21 NSCLC patients with suspected leptomeningeal metastases. Next-generation sequencing that included 416 cancer-associated genes was also performed on cerebrospinal fluid circulating tumor cells (CSFCTC) of 19 patients.Results: Twenty-one patients were diagnosed with leptomeningeal metastases, and CSFCTCs were captured by CellSearch in 20 patients (median, 969 CSFCTCs/7.5 mL; range, 27-14,888). CellSearch had a sensitivity of 95.2% for leptomeningeal metastases diagnosis, which was higher than that of TCT (12/21, 57.1%), MRI (10/21, 47.6%), and MRI plus TCT (19/21, 90.5%), respectively. CTCs were found only in 5 of 14 patients (median, 2 CTCs/7.5 mL; range, 2-4), which was a much lower ratio than CSFCTCs. Genetic profiles of CSFCTCs were highly concordant with molecular mutations identified in the primary tumor (17/19, 89.5%). The resistance gene EGFR T790M was detected in 7 of 9 patients with extracranial lesions, but was detected in only 1 of 14 CSFCTC samples. Other potential resistant mutations, such as MET amplification and ERBB2 mutation, were also identified in CSFCTCs.Conclusions: CSFCTCs captured by CellSearch may be a more sensitive and effective way to diagnose leptomeningeal metastases, and may serve as a liquid biopsy medium for gene profiles in NSCLC patients with leptomeningeal metastases. Clin Cancer Res; 23(18); 5480-8. ©2017 AACR.

Systemic Treatment of Brain Metastases

Lung cancer continues to be the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Brain metastases are a significant problem in patients with lung cancer and have conventionally been treated with whole-brain radiation. This article reviews the data for systemic chemotherapy to treat brain metastasis from lung cancer and examines the activity of small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the targeted therapy for brain metastases from EGFR-mutant and ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer. Future directions for evaluating the role of immunotherapy in treating brain metastasis are also discussed.