Combined SCLC clinical and pathologic characteristics

Exploring the prognostic impact of differences in treatment strategies for SCLC with different histologies and prognostic factors for C-SCLC: A SEER population-based study

Background

Combined small cell lung cancer (C-SCLC) is a rare type of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and it is controversial whether to choose the same treatment regimen as SCLC due to its multiple histologic components.

Study methods and results

Records of patients with small cell lung cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2020 were extracted using the SEER database. The OS of patients with different histological types under the same staging and treatment regimen was analyzed. It was found that early-stage (stage IA-IIA) surgical treatment, systemic chemotherapy alone, and chemoradiotherapy were more efficacious than C-SCLC and P-SCLC in patients with limited-stage (P = 0.054, P = 0.001, P = 0.019). In patients with extensive staging, the OS of patients with systemic chemotherapy regimens differed (P = 0.045) and was better in C-SCLC than in P-SCLC. We further explored the treatment strategy for patients with C-SCLC, which was shown by a COX regression model based on prognostic factors screened by Random Forest and LASSO regression models. Surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy would be beneficial for survival. In a subgroup analysis based on stage and treatment regimen, it was shown that patients with early staging (stage IA-IIA) had a better prognosis with surgery (P < 0.001); in patients with extensive staging, chemoradiotherapy was favorable to the patient's prognosis (P = 0.022).

Conclusion

Both limited-stage and extensive-stage C-SCLC patients are more sensitive to chemotherapy than P-SCLC patients. Patients with C-SCLC who have access to surgery should undergo surgery as early as possible, while chemoradiotherapy is recommended for patients with extensive staging. Patient age, gender, tumor size, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and metastasis may individually affect patient prognosis.

A combined small cell lung carcinoma patient with only small cell carcinoma components in mediastinal lymph node metastasis and chondrosarcoma-like components in liver metastasis

A 69-year-old ex-smoker Japanese man presented with a left mediastinal lymph node and left upper lobe tumour. Bronchoscopic biopsy specimens from the enlarged left mediastinal lymph node and left upper lobe tumour revealed small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). He was treated with first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab for four courses and subsequent atezolizumab maintenance therapy. However, his left upper lobe lung tumour only increased in size, and left upper lobectomy revealed combined SCLC (adenocarcinoma and chondrosarcoma-like features). Four months after lobectomy, liver metastasis of chondrosarcoma-like features (similar to pathological findings of the left upper lobe tumour) were observed. Combined SCLC, including sarcomatous components, is rare and poorly responds to chemotherapy. The metastases of combined SCLC in this patient were of only one type of histological component, making diagnosis and treatment difficult. If treatment for SCLC responds inadequately, considering combined SCLC and actively re-examining histological diagnosis is necessary.

Efficacy of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Primary Driver-Gene-Positive Combined Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Combined small-cell lung cancer (c-SCLC) with gene mutations is a rare subtype often found alongside adenocarcinoma. Targeted therapy may be effective because of the presence of specific molecular targets. However, due to its rarity and unconventional genetic testing, the efficacy remains uncertain.

METHODS

A total of 31 c-SCLC patients with gene mutations were retrospectively included and grouped according to their treatment regimens. Treatment outcomes were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, with Log Rank test applied for comparison between groups.

RESULTS

We divided the 31 patients into 3 groups according to first-line treatment: group A (chemotherapy, n = 16), group B (targeted monotherapy, n = 7), and group C (targeted combination therapy, n = 8). The overall response rates (ORR) were 43.8%, 42.9%, and 62.5%. The disease control rates (DCR) were 87.5%, 85.7%, and 100%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.0, 5.0, and 7.93 months (P = .024), with a significant difference between group A and C (P = .010). The median overall survival (OS) was 14.10, 17.43, and 12.93 months (P = .313). Seven patients in group A received targeted therapy in later-line. Of the total 22 patients received targeted monotherapy or combination therapy, the ORR and DCR were 54.5% and 90.9%. The median PFS and OS were 5.87 and 17.30 months. Additionally, adverse events (AEs) occurred in 53.8% and 88.9% of monotherapy and combination therapy. The most common AEs in monotherapy were elevated transaminases (23.1%) and in combination anemia (66.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

TKIs showed encouraging efficacy in driver-gene-positive c-SCLC. While monotherapy may be a supplementary option, combination with chemotherapy appears to be preferable and superior.

Sustained Clinical Response to 4th-Line Therapy with Selpercatinib in RET Fusion-Positive Combined Small Cell Lung Cancer

Objective

Combined small cell lung cancer (C-SCLC) is a relatively rare subtype of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) which combines SCLC and any component of non-small cell carcinoma (NSCLC). Patients diagnosed with C-SCLC are currently recommended to receive the same treatment as SCLC cases in the absence of clear evidence suggesting different strategies. The genomic profiling of C-SCLC is rarely studied. Herein, we report a case of extensive-stage C-SCLC harboring the KIF5B-RET fusion before first-line therapy and with persistent sensitivity to fourth-line selpercatinib treatment is reported.

Materials and Methods

Molecular and pathological features were evaluated using transbronchial lung biopsy, immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and next-generation sequencing (NGS).

Results

NGS revealed the KIF5B-RET fusion in the C-SCLC tumor. The patient had a progression-free survival (PFS) surpassing 14 months after selpercatinib treatment, with ongoing clinical response in 4th-line treatment.

Conclusion

This case highlights the importance of comprehensive molecular testing in C-SCLC for selecting the optimal treatment. Although RET fusion is rare in patients with C-SCLC, its identification and treatment with selective RET inhibitors may contribute to clinical benefits.

[Prevention, Diagnosis, Therapy, and Follow-up of Lung Cancer - Interdisciplinary Guideline of the German Respiratory Society and the German Cancer Society - Abridged Version]

The current S3 Lung Cancer Guidelines are edited with fundamental changes to the previous edition based on the dynamic influx of information to this field:The recommendations include de novo a mandatory case presentation for all patients with lung cancer in a multidisciplinary tumor board before initiation of treatment, furthermore CT-Screening for asymptomatic patients at risk (after federal approval), recommendations for incidental lung nodule management , molecular testing of all NSCLC independent of subtypes, EGFR-mutations in resectable early stage lung cancer in relapsed or recurrent disease, adjuvant TKI-therapy in the presence of common EGFR-mutations, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in resected lung cancer with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, obligatory evaluation of PD-L1-status, consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition after radiochemotherapy in patients with PD-L1-pos. tumor, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition in patients withPD-L1 ≥ 50% stage IIIA and treatment options in PD-L1 ≥ 50% tumors independent of PD-L1status and targeted therapy and treatment option immune chemotherapy in first line SCLC patients.Based on the current dynamic status of information in this field and the turnaround time required to implement new options, a transformation to a "living guideline" was proposed.

Canadian Consensus Recommendations on the Management of Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive, neuroendocrine tumour with high relapse rates, and significant morbidity and mortality. Apart from advances in radiation therapy, progress in the systemic treatment of SCLC had been stagnant for over three decades despite multiple attempts to develop alternative therapeutic options that could improve responses and survival. Recent promising developments in first-line and subsequent therapeutic approaches prompted a Canadian Expert Panel to convene to review evidence, discuss practice patterns, and reach a consensus on the treatment of extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). The literature search included guidelines, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials. Regular meetings were held from September 2022 to March 2023 to discuss the available evidence to propose and agree upon specific recommendations. The panel addressed biomarkers and histological features that distinguish SCLC from non-SCLC and other neuroendocrine tumours. Evidence for initial and subsequent systemic therapies was reviewed with consideration for patient performance status, comorbidities, and the involvement and function of other organs. The resulting consensus recommendations herein will help clarify evidence-based management of ES-SCLC in routine practice, help clinician decision-making, and facilitate the best patient outcomes.

Envafolimab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of combined small cell lung cancer: A case report

BACKGROUND

Combined small cell lung cancer (C-SCLC) is a special subtype of small cell lung cancer that is relatively rare, aggressive, and prone to early metastasis and has a poor prognosis. Currently, there are limited studies on C-SCLC, and there is no uniform standard treatment, especially for extensive C-SCLC, which still faces great challenges. In recent years, the development and progress of immunotherapy have provided more possibilities for the treatment of C-SCLC. We used immunotherapy combined with first-line chemotherapy to treat extensive-stage C-SCLC to explore its antitumor activity and safety.

CASE SUMMARY

We report a case of C-SCLC that presented early with adrenal, rib, and mediastinal lymph node metastases. The patient received carboplatin and etoposide with concurrent initiation of envafolimab. After 6 cycles of chemotherapy, the lung lesion was significantly reduced, and the comprehensive efficacy evaluation showed a partial response. No serious drug-related adverse events occurred during the treatment, and the drug regimen was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Envafolimab combined with carboplatin and etoposide in the treatment of extensive-stage C-SCLC has preliminary antitumor activity and good safety and tolerability.

Clinicopathological and Treatment Patterns of Combined Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma with Future Insight to Treatment: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Primary lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States (US). Approximately 90% of lung cancers are associated with smoking and the use of other tobacco products. Based on histology, lung cancers are divided into small-cell lung carcinomas (SCLCs) and non-small-cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs). Most SCLCs are of the pure subtype, while the rare combined SCLCs contain elements of both small-cell and non-small-cell morphologies. This study sought to evaluate the demographics, clinical factors, molecular abnormalities, treatment approaches, and survival outcomes with combined SCLC and NSCLCs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on 2126 combined SCLC patients was extracted from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) database from 2000 to 2018. Data extracted for analyses included age, sex, race, tumor size, tumor location, metastasis status, stage at diagnosis, treatment received, and treatment outcomes. Multivariate analysis was performed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) software.

RESULTS

The patients had a median age of 68 years; 43.9% of the patients were female and 56.1% were male; 84.5% were White and 11.7% were African Americans. The majority of patients had a poorly differentiated disease at 29.6%; 17% were undifferentiated, 3.2% were moderately differentiated, and 0.8% were well differentiated. Chemotherapy was the most common treatment modality (45.3%); 17% underwent surgery only, 10.3% underwent surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, and 10% underwent radiation after surgery. Five-year cancer-specific survival was 15.2% with surgery alone, and combined surgery and chemotherapy provided the highest percentages (38.3% and 34.7%, respectively). Females had significantly higher 1- and 5-year cancer-specific survival rates compared to males (59.3% and 29.9% vs. 48.0% and 23.7, respectively; p < 0.001). Well-differentiated tumors had significantly higher survival compared to other gradings (p < 0.001). Survival decreased as tumor staging moved distally from localized to regional to distant (p < 0.001). Metastasis to bone, liver, brain, and lung significantly decreased survival in comparison to patients who did not have any metastasis (p < 0.001). Females had significantly shorter survival compared to their counterparts when metastasis was to the bone, brain, or liver (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified male sex (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.2), undifferentiated grade (HR = 1.9), regional extent of disease (HR = 1.7), distant extent of disease (HR = 3.7), and metastasis to liver (HR = 3.5) as variables associated with worse survival.

CONCLUSION

Combined SCLC is overall very rare. However, the frequency of presentation with combined SCLC is on the rise, in part due to improvements in diagnostic techniques. Despite advances in therapies, treating combined SCLC is challenging, and novel therapies are not utilized, owing to low rates of targetable mutations. Combined SCLC has higher survival rates if well differentiated.

Different clinical characteristics and survival between surgically resected pure and combined small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most malignant and common form of neuroendocrine lung cancer with pure (P-SCLC) and combined subtypes (C-SCLC). However, little is known about the differences between these two groups and in this study we aimed to provide a more comprehensive insight into SCLC.

METHODS

Data from 580 postoperative patients with pathologically confirmed SCLC in Shanghai Chest Hospital from January 2010 to December 2020 were collected retrospectively. The clinical characteristics and prognosis were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 357 P-SCLC patients and 223 C-SCLC patients were included. The results indicated that P-SCLC appeared to have a higher proportion of being located in the middle lobe than C-SCLC. The incidences of P-SCLC in patients with visceral pleural invasion (VPI) and in stage II were higher than C-SCLC, while C-SCLC was more likely to be accompanied by higher incidences of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement, and higher levels of CEA, SCCA and CYFRA21-1 than P-SCLC. The most common were SCLC combined with large cell neuroendocrine components among 223 C-SCLCs. Survival analysis confirmed a more favorable disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.016) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.024) in patients with P-SCLCs compared with C-SCLCs. Histological type, tumor location, pN stage, adjuvant chemotherapy, serum NSE and CA125 levels were independent risk factors for survival rate in SCLC. In addition, adjuvant chemotherapy was beneficial in improving stage I P-SCLC and C-SCLC DFS and OS rates, and similar results were not seen in adjuvant radiation therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with C-SCLC have a poorer prognosis than P-SCLC patients. We determined that large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma was the most common additional component of C-SCLC, and patients with this component appeared to have a longer DFS and OS than other combined components.

Abscopal effect of radiation therapy and nivolumab in a patient with combined small-cell lung cancer: a case report

The paradigm for combined small-cell lung carcinoma (C-SCLC) is according to standard SCLC treatment with poor outcomes. The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy for pretreated SCLC is still limited. Clinical researches exploring radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy showed promising synergistic effects in several tumors. We report one C-SCLC case after resistant to comprehensive treatment receiving nivolumab combined with radiotherapy achieving clinical complete remission (CCR). The combination module of ICI and radiation could be an option for relapsed C-SCLC, and the prognostic indicators need further research.

Autopsy case of a patient with rapidly progressive combined small-cell lung carcinoma with spindle-shaped cell tumor

A 69-year-old Japanese man visited our hospital because of worsening shortness of breath. His chest computed tomography (CT) showed a giant left lung mass with a massive left pleural effusion. He could not be treated with chemotherapy and eventually died from a rapidly progressive tumor. He was diagnosed with combined small cell lung carcinoma (C-SCLC) with spindle-shaped cell tumor at autopsy. C-SCLC is characterized by pathologically concurrent SCLC and adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma, or rarely, spindle-shaped cell tumor. The clinical course of C-SCLC with spindle-shaped cell tumor has not previously been determined. Our patient's tumor increased by 2.59-fold in 20 days. The combination of C-SCLC with spindle-shaped cell tumor suggested rapid progression and a poor prognosis.

New perspectives in the management of small cell lung cancer

The treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a challenge for all specialists involved. New treatments have been added to the therapeutic armamentarium in recent months, but efforts must continue to improve both survival and quality of life. Advances in surgery and radiotherapy have resulted in prolonged survival times and fewer complications, while more careful patient selection has led to increased staging accuracy. Developments in the field of systemic therapy have resulted in changes to clinical guidelines and the management of patients with advanced disease, mainly with the introduction of immunotherapy. In this article, we describe recent improvements in the management of patients with SCLC, review current treatments, and discuss future lines of research.

Transformation from lung adenocarcinoma to combined small cell carcinoma in pleural effusion after treatment with osimertinib

The transformation of lung adenocarcinoma to combined small cell lung cancer is a rare mechanism of acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. This case describes this mechanism in a pleural effusion of a young patient treated with osimertinib for 18 months.

Multiple Primary Lung Cancers With ALK Rearrangement: A Case Report and Literature Review

Multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) are that patients with lung cancer may present with two primary tumors at the same time (synchronous multiple primary lung cancer, SMPLC) or may develop a second, metachronous primary lung cancer after treatment of the initial lesion. Currently, there are no definitive guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of multiple primary lung cancers. Herein, we report a case of double primary lung cancers with ALK rearrangement. The patient was treated with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and radiotherapy. After these treatments, the patient was free of locally recurrent or distant disease at 2 years.

Combined SCLC clinical and pathological aspects

Combined small cell lung carcinoma (C-SCLC) is rare and accounts for 1-3% of all lung cancer cases. Although its incidence has increased recently, there are limited studies on it. The records of patients admitted to our hospital between January 2015 and December 2019 and diagnosed with histologically proven combined small cell were scanned retrospectively and reviewed. 31 patients were analyzed. The average follow-up time was 10 months. The radiotherapy (RT) rate, surgery rate, and large cell malignancy rate were significantly lower in the ex group than in the living group (p=0.024, p=0.023, p=0.015). The rates of extensive disease, metastasis, and thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF1) were significantly higher in the old group than in the living group (p=0.000, p=0.000, p=0.029, respectively). In the univariate model, sequential RT, fatigue, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), stage, metastasis, contralateral lung metastasis, chemotherapy were observed to be significantly effective in predicting survival time (p=0.000, p=0.050, p=0.011, p=0.004, p=0.004, p=0.045, p=0.009).  In the multivariate model, independent (p=0.015, p=0.022, p=0.049) efficacy of RT, stage, and chemotherapy in predicting survival was observed. C-SCLC is a specific mixed carcinoma and reports evaluating this type are still scarce. The stage of the disease, radiotherapy and chemotherapy are extremely important in predicting survival.

Whole-Process Treatment of Combined Small Cell Lung Cancer Initially Diagnosed as "Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma": A Case Report and Review of the Literature

The rarity and complexity of histology lead to the low diagnosis rate and high misdiagnosis rate of combined small cell lung cancer (C-SCLC). Nowadays, C-SCLC has no commonly recommended therapeutic regimen, mainly conforming to SCLC treatment. Here, we report a patient initially diagnosed as IIIA "lung squamous cell carcinoma" by a small specimen. Radical resection was achieved after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, and the final surgical pathology was C-SCLC containing three different histological components. Moreover, in the literature review, we explored the therapeutic effect of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in C-SCLC, expounded the therapeutic conflicts among heterogeneous components, and analyzed the pathology complexity at the tissue, cell, and molecule levels in-depth, including possible genetic characteristics, origin, and evolution by next-generation sequencing (NGS).

Small cell lung cancer transformation: From pathogenesis to treatment

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a type of neuroendocrine tumor with high malignancy and poor prognosis. Besides the de novo SCLC, there is transformed SCLC, which has similar characteristics of pathological morphology, molecular characteristics, clinical manifestations and drug sensitivity. However, de novo SCLC and transformed SCLC have different pathogenesis and tumor microenvironment. SCLC transformation is one of the mechanisms of resistance to chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy in NSCLC. Two hypotheses have been used to explain the pathogenesis of SCLC transformation. Although SCLC transformation is not common in clinical practice, it has been repeatedly identified in many small patient series and case reports. It usually occurs in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant lung adenocarcinoma after treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). SCLC transformation can also occur in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive lung cancer after treatment with ALK inhibitors and in wild-type EGFR or ALK NSCLC treated with immunotherapy. Chemotherapy was previously used to treat transformed SCLC, yet it is associated with an unsatisfactory prognosis. We comprehensively review the advancements in transformed SCLC, including clinical and pathological characteristics, and the potential effective treatment after SCLC transformation, aiming to give a better understanding of transformed SCLC and provide support for clinical uses.

Case Report: Combined Small Cell Lung Carcinoma With Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma

Background

Combined small cell lung carcinoma is defined as cancer tissues that mainly contain small cell lung cancer (SCLC) components with non-SCLC (NSCLC) histopathological types. The most common part of NSCLC is squamous cell carcinoma or large cell carcinoma. Combined SCLC (CSCLC) contains adenocarcinoma is extremely rare.

Case Presentation

We reported a case with surgically treated diagnosed as CSCLC with adenocarcinoma in an elderly and we summarized the clinical features of this disease. The patient has remained well for over 2 weeks after the treatment.

Conclusion

There are still few research reports on CSCLC. Since the survival time of patients with advanced CSCLC is shorter than that of simple SCLC, the recommended treatment for CSCLC is early detection and early surgery. In order to facilitate preoperative diagnosis and avoid misdiagnosis of such rare diseases, more cases need to be reported.

Clinical features and prognostic factors of combined small cell lung cancer: development and validation of a nomogram based on the SEER database

Background

Combined small-cell lung cancer (CSCLC) refers to the simultaneous presence of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and any subtype of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to explore the prognosis of CSCLC, NSCLC, and pure SCLC patients, and to develop a nomogram to estimate the overall survival (OS) for CSCLC patients.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with NSCLC, CSCLC, and pure SCLC between 2004 and 2015 were identified from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Survival analyses were performed by using the Kaplan Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression. All CSCLC patients were randomly split 7:3 into training and validation sets. A nomogram was developed by integrating all independent predictors for OS. The performance of the nomogram was determined by discrimination, calibration ability, clinical usefulness, and risk stratification ability.

Results

A total of 326,695 lung cancer patients, including 871 with CSCLC, 280,391 with NSCLC, and 45,433 with pure SCLC were enrolled. CSCLC was associated with worse survival compared with NSCLC both in the unmatched and matched cohorts. However, compared to pure SCLC, CSCLC was associated with significantly better survival in the unmatched cohorts only, while showed marginally non-significantly better survival after propensity score matching (PSM). For CSCLC, a nomogram was constructed for the 6-month, 1-year, and 3-year OS prediction by combining the independent risk factors, including age, gender, tumor, node, and metastasis stage, surgery, and chemotherapy. The nomogram showed good discrimination and calibration both in the training and validation sets, and better performance than the tumor-node-metastasis staging system. Risk stratification analysis indicated that the nomogram scores efficiently divided CSCLC patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups (P<0.001).

Conclusions

CSCLC patients presented a significantly worse prognosis than patients with NSCLC, but comparable prognosis when compared with pure SCLC patients in the matched cohorts. In addition, we developed and validated a nomogram for predicting the 6-month, 1-year, and 3-year OS in CSCLC patients.

Successful Treatment of an Elderly Patient With Combined Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Anlotinib: A Case Report

Combined small-cell lung cancer (C-SCLC) is a relatively rare subtype of SCLC and is defined by the combination of SCLC and any elements of non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Anlotinib is a novel oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor that led to significant improvements in progression-free survival and overall survival in third-line therapy of advanced SCLC in the ALTER1202 study. Antiangiogenic therapy with anlotinib in C-SCLC has not previously been reported. An 80-year-old man was admitted with a 20-day history of blood-stained sputum. Chest computed tomography revealed a soft mass (45 × 43 mm) in the right upper lobe and a mediastinal lymph node and additional lung lesions in the homo lung. Pathology confirmed C-SCLC after an ultrasound-guided percutaneous puncture biopsy of the right lung tumor. The elderly patient was given anlotinib monotherapy at a dose of 10 mg/day on days 1–14 of a 21-day cycle after providing informed consent, and the outcome was assessed as continued partial response. As of the last follow-up evaluation, the patient’s progression-free survival was more than 7 months, and the treatment showed satisfactory safety. Our findings provide direct evidence of the efficacy of anlotinib in an elderly patient with C-SCLC. More studies are needed to confirm our observations.

Clinicopathological Difference and Survival Impact of Patients with c-SCLC and SCLC

Background

Combined small cell lung cancer (c-SCLC) distinguishes itself from small cell lung cancer (SCLC) due to its inclusion of both SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) components. Few studies have compared clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis and factors affecting survival. We therefore addressed the issues in this study.

Patients and Methods

A total of 400 c-SCLC and 20,841 SCLC patients were enrolled using SEER database. Difference in clinicopathological characteristics of SCLC and c-SCLC patients was analyzed using chi-square. Kaplan–Meier was applied to compare their survival before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Cox regression model was adopted to assess the impact of different clinical variables on survival. Logistic regression was applied to identify risk factors for c-SCLC and SCLC patients.

Results

Differences in race, sex, T stage, N stage, surgery, bone, brain and liver metastasis were detected between c-SCLC and SCLC patients. c-SCLC patients had better overall survival (OS) than SCLC patients before PSM. Age, race, sex, T stage, N stage, surgery, bone, brain, liver and lung metastasis were prognostic factors affecting OS for c-SCLC and SCLC (P < 0.05). However, a significant OS benefit was not observed in c-SCLC after adjusting for clinicopathological variables (HR, 0.950; 95% CI, 0.842–1.073; P=0.411). No significant OS difference was found between c-SCLC and SCLC patients after PSM (P = 0.789). c-SCLC patients had lower risk of lymph node (OR: 0.555; 95% CI: 0.439–0.703; P < 0.001) and liver metastasis (OR: 0.591; 95% CI: 0.448–0.779; P < 0.001), whereas had no significant differences in bone and brain metastasis risks (P > 0.05) compared with SCLC patients.

Conclusion

The prognosis of c-SCLC did not significantly differ from that of SCLC if clinicopathological characteristics are controlled. Better prognosis for c-SCLC patients over SCLC patients may be ascribed to fewer liver and lymph node metastases upon diagnosis.

Comparative Study of Pulmonary Combined Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma and Combined Small-Cell Carcinoma in Surgically Resected High-Grade Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Lung

Objectives

Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) are both classified as pure and combined subtypes. Due to the low incidence and difficult diagnosis of combined LCNEC (C-LCNEC) and combined SCLC (C-SCLC), few studies have compared their clinical features and prognosis.

Materials and Methods

We compared the clinical features, mutation status of driver genes (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, KRAS, and BRAF), and prognosis between C-LCNEC and C-SCLC. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were applied for survival analysis.

Results

We included a total of 116 patients with C-LCNEC and 76 patients with C-SCLC in the present study. There were significant differences in distribution of smoking history, tumor location, pT stage, pN stage, pTNM stage, visceral pleural invasion (VPI), and combined components between C-LCNEC and C-SCLC (P<0.05 for all). C-SCLC was more advanced at diagnosis as compared to C-LCNEC. The incidence of EGFR mutations in C-LCNEC patients was higher than C-SCLC patients (25.7 vs. 5%, P=0.004). We found that tumor size, pN stage, peripheral CEA level, and adjuvant chemotherapy were independently prognostic factors for DFS and OS in C-LCNEC patients, while peripheral NSE level, pT stage, pN stage, VPI and adjuvant chemotherapy were independently associated with DFS and OS for C-SCLC patients (P<0.05 for all). Propensity score matching with adjustment for the confounders confirmed a more favorable DFS (P=0.032) and OS (P=0.019) in patients with C-LCNEC in comparison with C-SCLC patients upon survival analysis.

Conclusions

The mutation landscape of driver genes seemed to act in different way between C-SCLC and C-LCNEC, likely by which result in clinical phenotype difference as well as better outcome in C-LCNEC.

Small cell lung cancer transformation during antitumor therapies: A systematic review

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are the two major histological categories of lung cancers. Drug resistance is a great challenge for cancer treatment, and histological transformation from NSCLC to SCLC is one of the mechanisms underlying drug resistance in NSCLC patients. SCLC-transformed patients show combined characteristics of NSCLC and SCLC; however, they lack timely diagnoses and effective treatment strategies. Thus, we reviewed the clinical characteristics of SCLC transformation patients with a literature search to enhance clinical consciousness, diagnosis, and personalized treatment for patients with it.

YAP1 protein expression has variant prognostic significance in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) stratified by histological subtypes

BACKGROUND

Recently, expression of YAP1, a nuclear effector of an inactivated HIPPO pathway, has been identified as one of four molecular subtypes of SCLC. However, the clinicopathological relevance and prognostic significance of YAP1 expression in SCLC stratified by histological subtypes has not been systematically reported to date.

METHODS

Tumor sections and corresponding formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of 297 SCLC patients were retrieved from the pathological specimen repository and were subsequently reviewed by pathologists. Forty-six C-SCLCs (combined SCLCs) (15.5%) and 251P-SCLCs (pure SCLCs) (84.5%) were identified respectively. YAP1 expression was examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and assessed semi-quantitatively on tumor tissue array (TMA). Propensity score was used to match C-SCLCs and P-SCLCs in a ratio of 1 to 2 to balance age, gender, tumor stage and treatment methods. Finally, 46C-SCLCs and 92P-SCLCs were included for prognostic analysis.

RESULTS

The positive rate of YAP1 expression was significantly higher in C-SCLCs than P-SCLCs before matching (52.2% vs 29.1%, P = 0.004). After matching by propensity score, the prescribed clinical parameters were well balanced between P-SCLCs and C-SCLCs. Expression of YAP1 was associated worse overall survival (OS) (5- year OS%, 39.0% vs. 74.9%, P = 0.013) and was an independent risk factor for OS (HR = 2.93, 95% CI: 1.01-8.51; P = 0.048) exclusively in C-SCLC. Univariate survival analysis in subgroups of different clinical variables also confirmed the prognostic impact of YAP1 was most significant in C-SCLC. But for P-SCLCs, expression of YAP1 showed no prognostic impact.

CONCLUSIONS

Expression of YAP1 in small cell components of C-SCLC was significantly higher than that in P-SCLC. Besides, it served as an unfavorable predictor for OS in C-SCLC but not in P-SCLC, which suggested different entities of small cell components with variant YAP1 expression and potential different targetable oncogenic pathway between C-SCLC and P-SCLC.

Liquid biopsy as an option for predictive testing and prognosis in patients with lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical value of liquid biopsy as a primary source for variant analysis in lung cancer. In addition, we sought to characterize liquid biopsy variants and to correlate mutational load to clinical data.

METHODS

Circulating cell-free DNA was extracted from plasma from patients with lung cancer (n = 60) and controls with benign lung disease (n = 16). Variant analysis was performed using the AVENIO ctDNA Surveillance kit and the results were correlated to clinical and variant analysis data from tumor tissue or cytology retrieved from clinical routine diagnostics.

RESULTS

There were significantly more variants detected in lung cancer cases compared to controls (p = 0.011), but no difference between the histological subgroups of lung cancer was found (p = 0.465). Furthermore, significantly more variants were detected in patients with stage IIIb-IV disease compared to patients with stage I-IIIa (median 7 vs 4, p = 0.017). Plasma cfDNA mutational load was significantly associated with overall survival (p = 0.010). The association persisted when adjusted for stage and ECOG performance status (HR: 3.64, 95% CI 1.37-9.67, p = 0.009). Agreement between tumor and plasma samples significantly differed with stage; patients with stage IIIb-IV disease showed agreement in 88.2% of the cases with clinically relevant variants, compared to zero cases in stage I-IIIa (p = 0.004). Furthermore, one variant in EGFR, two in KRAS, and one in BRAF were detected in plasma but not in tumor samples.

CONCLUSION

This study concludes that in the vast majority of advanced NSCLC patients a reliable variant analysis can be performed using liquid biopsy from plasma. Furthermore, we found that the number of variants in plasma is associated with prognosis, possibly indicating a strategy for closer follow up on this crucial patient group.

Comprehensive genomic profiling of combined small cell lung cancer

Background

Combined small cell lung cancer (CSCLC) is an uncommon and heterogeneous subtype of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, there is limited data concerning the different molecular changes and clinical features in CSCLC compared to pure SCLC.

Methods

The clinical and pathological characteristics of pure SCLC and CSCLC patients were analyzed. Immunohistochemistry and microdissection were performed to isolate the CSCLC components. Further molecular analysis was carried out by next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 12 CSCLC and 30 pure SCLC.

Results

There were no significant differences in clinical features between CSCLC and pure SCLC. Overall survival (OS) of CSCLC patients was worse than pure SCLC (P=0.005). NGS results indicated that TP53 and RB1 were the most frequently mutated genes in both CSCLC (83.33% and 66.67%) and pure SCLC (80.00% and 63.33%) groups. However, less than 10% common mutations were found in both CSCLC and pure SCLC. When analyzing the data of SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) components of CSCLC, more than 50% common mutations, and identical genes with mutations were detected. Moreover, there were also common biological processes and signaling pathways identified in CSCLC and pure SCLC, in addition to SCLC and NSCLC components.

Conclusions

There were no significant differences in terms of clinical features between CSCLC and pure SCLC. However, the prognosis for CSCLC was worse than pure SCLC. NGS analysis suggested that CSCLC components might derive from the same pluripotent single clone with common initial molecular alterations and subsequent acquisitions of other genetic mutations.

Identification of RUNX1T1 as a potential epigenetic modifier in small-cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) can be subgrouped into common 'pure' and rare 'combined' SCLC (c-SCLC). c-SCLC features a mixed tumor histology of both SCLC and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We performed targeted exome sequencing on 90 patients with SCLC, including two with c-SCLC, and discovered RUNX1T1 amplification specific to small cell tumors of both patients with c-SCLC, but in only 2 of 88 'pure' SCLC patients. RUNX1T1 was first identified in the fusion transcript AML1/ETO, which occurs in 12%-15% of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). We further show higher expression of RUNX1T1 in the SCLC component of another c-SCLC tumor by in situ hybridization. RUNX1T1 expression was enriched in SCLC compared with all other cancers, including NSCLC, in both cell lines and tumor specimens, as shown by mRNA level and western blotting. Transcriptomic analysis of hallmark genes decreased by stable RUNX1T1 overexpression revealed a significant change in E2F targets. Validation experiments in multiple lung cancer cell lines showed that RUNX1T1 overexpression consistently decreased CDKN1A (p21) expression and increased E2F transcriptional activity, which is commonly altered in SCLC. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) in these overexpressing cells demonstrated that RUNX1T1 interacts with the CDKN1A (p21) promoter region, which displayed parallel reductions in histone 3 acetylation. Furthermore, reduced p21 expression could be dramatically restored by HDAC inhibition using Trichostatin A. Reanalysis of ChIP-seq data in Kasumi-1 AML cells showed that knockdown of the RUNX1T1 fusion protein was associated with increased global acetylation, including the CDKN1A (p21) promoter. Thus, our study identifies RUNX1T1 as a biomarker and potential epigenetic regulator of SCLC.

Combined small cell lung carcinoma harboring ALK rearrangement: A case report and literature review

Combined small cell lung cancer (c‐SCLC) is a relatively rare subtype of SCLC and is defined by the combination of SCLC and any elements of non‐small cell carcinoma (NSCLC). Standard chemotherapy for patients with c‐SCLC has not yet been established. Gene mutations such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations may be detected in patients with c‐SCLC. However, little is known about anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement in c‐SCLC patients. Here, we report a young female patient who was successfully treated with alectinib for ALK‐positive c‐SCLC after failure of immunochemotherapy for SCLC and cytotoxic chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma. Moreover, we performed a literature review of EGFR‐ or ALK‐positive c‐SCLC patients. Our report suggests that ALK testing may be justified in patients with SCLC that contain an adenocarcinoma component.

Key points

Significant findings of the study

• This is the first report describing the treatment course comprising immunochemotherapy and ALK‐TKI in a patient with c‐SCLC harboring ALK rearrangement.

What this study adds

• Our case and literature review suggest that although ALK mutation is rare in patients with c‐SCLC, its identification and treatment with ALK‐TKIs may contribute to clinical benefits.

Treatments for combined small cell lung cancer patients

Background

Combined small cell lung cancer (CSCLC) is a subtype of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) which contains both components of SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The prognostic outcomes and treatment strategy of it are still unclear. A large-scale retrospective study was performed to investigate proper treatments for CSCLC.

Methods

All cases of CSCLC were identified from the SEER database during the period of 2004–2016. Clinical characteristics, first-line treatments, surgical procedures and survival data including overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed.

Results

A total of 37,639 SCLC patients were identified. CSCLC accounted for 2.1% (784/37,639). The mean age of CSCLC cohort is 67.3±9.9 years old. Male and white ethnicity patients were accounted for larger proportions (55.7% and 80.4%). The oncological characteristics of CSCLC were consistent with SCLC that most of patients were diagnosed as higher grade and advanced stages. The prognosis of CSCLC was better than SCLC but worse than NSCLC in IA-IIIA stages. No difference was observed in IIIB-IV. Surgery was beneficial in IA-IB stage CSCLC. Adjuvant chemotherapy seemed to have few effects on early stage patients. Trimodality treatment could significantly improve OS in IIA-IIIA CSCLC patients. Chemotherapy-based treatment is predominant choice in advanced stage patients.

Conclusions

CSCLC is a rare and special subtype of SCLC. It has better survival outcome than non-CSCLC in early stage. Surgical treatment is crucial in early stage of CSCLC. Prognostic improvement might be achieved from trimodality treatment in stage IIA-IIIA. Chemotherapy-based treatments should be considered in advanced stage. The effect of surgical treatments in advanced stage patients should be further investigated.

Comparative study of clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis between combined and pure small cell lung cancer (SCLC) after surgical resection

Background

Histologically, SCLC are classified as pure (P‐SCLC) and combined subtypes (C‐SCLC). Currently, few studies compare the clinicopathological characteristics and explore the treatment strategies applied to them.

Methods

Between July 2005 and April 2016, the clinical records of 297 postoperative patients with pathologically confirmed SCLC were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan‐Meier method and Cox regression model were separately used for stratified univariate and multivariate survival analysis.

Results

A total of 46 cases (15.5%) of C‐SCLCs and 251 cases (85.5%) of pure SCLCs (P‐SCLCs) were included in this study. The average age of C‐SCLCs was a little higher than that of P‐SCLCs (59.65 ± 8.72 vs. 56.56 ± 10.12; P = 0.053). More patients had a history of smoking in C‐SCLC (78.3% vs. 63.3%; P = 0.074). The five‐year overall survival (OS) rate for P‐SCLCs and C‐SCLCs was 65.1% and 56.7%, respectively (P = 0.683). For P‐SCLC, stage and an intervention of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) were independent factors that affected OS. In C‐SCLCs cases, performing sublobectomy was an independent risk factor for poor prognosis.

Conclusions

We identified no significant difference in clinical characteristics and outcome between C‐SCLCs and P‐SCLCs. However, the factors affecting the prognosis of the two subtypes were slightly inconsistent. For C‐SCLCs, the extent of resection had a greater impact on survival, and lobectomy combined with systemic lymph node dissection should therefore be performed as extensively as possible. In addition, PCI was beneficial in improving the SCLC OS rate.

Key points

This study demonstrated the prognosis of C‐SCLCs did not significantly differ from that of P‐SCLCs, but was more susceptible to the extent of resection. Patients with C‐SCLC who underwent limited resection had a significantly increased risk of shorter OS.

This study highlighted the importance of performing lobectomy for resectable C‐SCLC patients. This study also proved the benefit of PCI in improving the OS rate for both P‐SCLC and C‐SCLC patients.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of surgically resected combined small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most malignant lung cancer. Some of them are mixed with non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC, Non SCLC),which are called combined small cell lung cancer (C-SCLC).Due to the difficulty of pathological diagnosis and the complexity of treatment, studies of C-SCLC have just been rising in recent years. This study is to evaluate the clinical and pathologic characteristics of C-SCLC.

METHODS

Stage Ⅰ-Ⅲa C-SCLC patients who received radical R0 surgery between 2009-2018 in Shanghai Chest Hospital were enrolled. Clinical characteristics and prognosis were analyzed.

RESULTS

Totally 181 patients were included, most of them were small cell combined with large cell neuroendocrine components(SCLC/LCNEC,58.0 %,N = 105),then with adenocarcinoma(SCLC/ADC:13.8 %,N = 25),and finally with squamous cell carcinoma(SCLC/SCC:13.3 %,N = 24).Median DFS and OS of C-SCLC patients underwent radical surgery were 32.5 and 49.7 months.1,3 and 5 years DFS rates of the entire cohort were 68.5 %,32.6 % and 16.0 %,respectively. Patients with SCLC/LCNEC had longer DFS (44.1 m vs. 20.4 m, p = 0.040) and longer OS trend (62.1 m vs. 33.2 m, p = 0.122).Groups of whether tumor invaded the pleura(p = 0.028 and p = 0.050),lymph node stage(p = 0.029 and p = 0.010) and the courses of adjuvant chemotherapy(p = 0.011 and p = 0.001) had statistical differences on DFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

SCLC/LCNEC was the most common type of C-SCLC. Patients' DFS and OS were also longer than other combined types. Adjuvant chemotherapy for SCLC is still the main treatment for surgical C-SCLC. Further studies are needed to clarify the clinical characteristics and prognosis of C-SCLC.

Primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on 18F-FDG PET/CT and mixed NSCLC components predict survival in surgical-resected combined small-cell lung cancer

Purpose

The combined small-cell lung cancer (c-SCLC) is rare and has unique clinicopathological futures. The aim of this study is to investigate ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT parameters and clinicopathological factors that influence the prognosis of c-SCLC.

Methods

Between November 2005 and October 2014, surgical-resected tumor samples from c-SCLC patients who received preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT examination were retrospectively reviewed. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were used to evaluate metabolic parameters in primary tumors. The survivals were evaluated with the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate potential prognostic factors.

Results

Thirty-one patients were enrolled, with a median age of 62 (range: 35 − 79) years. The most common mixed component was squamous cell carcinoma (SCC, n = 12), followed by large-cell carcinoma (LCC, n = 7), adenocarcinoma (AC, n = 6), spindle cell carcinoma (n = 4), adenosquamous carcinoma (n = 1) and atypical carcinoid (n = 1). The median follow-up period was 53.0 (11.0–142.0) months; the 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival(PFS) rate were 48.4% and 35.5%, respectively. Univariate survival analysis showed that gender, smoking history, tumor location were associated with PFS (P = 0.036, P = 0.043, P = 0.048), SUVmax and TNM stage were closely related to PFS in both Mixed SCC and non-SCC component groups (P = 0.007, P = 0.048). SUV_max, smoking history, tumor size and mixed SCC component were influencing factors of OS in patients (P = 0.040, P = 0.041, P = 0.046, P = 0.029). Multivariate survival analysis confirmed that TNM stage (HR = 2.885, 95%CI: 1.323–6.289, P = 0.008) was the most significantly influential factor for PFS. High SUV_max value (HR = 9.338, 95%CI: 2.426–35.938, P = 0.001) and mixed SCC component (HR = 0.155, 95%CI: 0.045–0.530, P = 0.003) were poor predictors for OS.

Conclusion

Surgical-resected c-SCLCs have a relatively good prognosis. TNM stage is the most significant factor influencing disease progression in surgical-resected c-SCLCs. SUVmax and mixed NSCLC components within c-SCLCs had a considerable influence on the survival. Both high SUVmax and mixed SCC component are poor predictors for patients with c-SCLCs.

Surgery for small cell lung cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Survey from 2010 to 2015

The role of surgery in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is controversial. This study explored whether surgery offered a survival benefits for patients with SCLC.Patients diagnosed with SCLC between 2010 and 2015 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) stage of SCLC in these patients was reclassified according to the 8th edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. Overall survival (OS) was separately compared according to TNM stage between patients who underwent surgery and those who did not using Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox regression model was used to identify relevant variables affecting survival. Additional Kaplan-Meier curves were created to compare different types of surgery. Cox regression models and Forest plots were used to identify the predictors of survival in the surgery cohort.A total of 26,659 patients with SCLC were included, among which 627 (2.4%) patients underwent surgery. Surgery was associated with longer survival in patients with stage IA (45.0 vs 20.0 months, P < .001), stage IB (47.0 vs 19.0 months, P = .001), stage IIA (16.0 m vs NR, P = .007), stage III (18.0 vs 12.0 months, P < .001), and stage IV (9.0 vs 5.0 months, P < .001) disease, although the difference was not statistically significant for patients with stage IIB disease. Multivariate analysis identified surgery as an independent predictor of improved survival for all cohorts divided by stages except for stage IIB. Lobectomy was the most commonly performed procedure. Multivariate analysis in patients who underwent surgery identified lobectomy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.544; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.341-0.869; P = .011) and chemotherapy (HR, 0.634; 95% CI, 0.487-0.827; P < .001) as independent predictors of improved survival in the surgery cohort.In a national analysis, surgery was performed in some patients for both early and advanced-stage SCLC. Surgery for SCLC was associated with improved survival except for patients with stage IIB disease. These results support an increased role of surgery in multimodal therapy for SCLC.

Effect of histological subtype and treatment modalities on T1-2 N0-1 small cell lung cancer: A population-based study

Background

Combined small cell lung cancer (C‐SCLC) is rare and its clinical features, appropriate treatment, and prognosis are poorly understood. Reports conflict over the prognosis of C‐SCLCs compared to pure small cell lung cancer.

Methods

The records of patients diagnosed with primary SCLC from 1988 to 2014 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The general features of C‐SCLCs were compared to those of SCLCs. T1–2 N0–1 data was extracted and the effects of the histological subtype, treatment modality, and other prognostic factors on lung cancer‐specific survival (CSS) was analyzed in a 3:1 matched dataset. Analysis was performed using the 8th edition tumor node metastasis staging system and previous staging systems adjunctively.

Results

C‐SCLCs comprised 1.5% of all SCLCs (1486/98 667); 184 cases of C‐SCLCs and 2681 cases of non‐combined SCLCs (NC‐SCLCs) were included in this study. C‐SCLCs were more likely to be of a higher grade and to occur in the upper lobe than NC‐SCLCs. Before matching, C‐SCLCs showed better CSS (hazard ratio 0.69; P < 0.001). However, stratified Cox proportional hazards analysis in the matched dataset revealed that only treatment modality and age at diagnosis were associated with CSS; the histological subtype had no effect on survival. Of all treatment modalities, surgery with chemoradiation showed the best CSS in T1–2 N0–1 SCLC.

Conclusion

In early SCLC, surgery with chemoradiation shows the best CSS. C‐SCLC patients might benefit more from multimodal treatments, including surgery, than SCLC patients.

Combined small-cell lung carcinoma

Currently, studies assessing combined small-cell lung carcinoma (C-SCLC) are relatively scarce and limited. Indeed the clinicopathological features, treatment, and prognosis of patients with C-SCLC have not been fully determined. The incidence of C-SCLC ranges from 5%–28% in different studies, which is related to the specimen types used. The clinical features of C-SCLC are characterized by the higher proportion of peripheral locations, earlier stage, and more opportunity to experience surgery. Surgery is more important for earlier stage C-SCLC. There have been no recent changes in the chemotherapy of C-SCLC, which is recommended by the treatment guidelines for SCLC, neither showing survival benefit from the 3-agent regimen. Meanwhile, the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in EGFR-mutated C-SCLC patients remains inconclusive. This review focuses on clinical and pathologic features, prognostic factors, and optimized treatment model in C-SCLC.

Pathology Issues in Thoracic Oncology: Histologic Characterization and Tissue/Plasma Genotyping May Resolve Diagnostic Dilemmas

Lung cancer is a heterogeneous diagnosis that encompasses a spectrum of histologic and molecular subgroups. A paradigm shift favoring selection of treatment based on histologic and molecular makeup has positively affected prognosis for patients with metastatic lung cancer, with select patients experiencing durable responses to treatment. However, prognosis remains poor for the majority of patients. Furthermore, oncologists are increasingly faced with challenging dilemmas related to histopathologic and molecular characterization of tumors, both at diagnosis and during treatment. In this review, we focus on three particular challenges: (1) management of mixed histology tumors, a particularly aggressive group of lung cancers, (2) distinguishing multiple primary lung tumors from intrapulmonary metastases, and (3) incorporation of liquid biopsies into the diagnostic algorithm and subsequent follow-up of patients with advanced lung cancer. This review will summarize the existing literature and highlight the potential for molecular genotyping to help refine approaches to each of these challenges.

Combined Small Cell Carcinoma of the Lung: Is It a Single Entity?

BACKGROUND

SCLC accounts for 15% and 20% of all lung cancers, with combined SCLC (CSCLC) comprising 2% to 5%. Little is known about the clinical characteristics and molecular changes associated with the various histologic components.

METHODS

A total of 205 SCLC cases were resected between 2005 and 2015. Clinical and pathologic features were analyzed. All CSCLC cases were confirmed by histologic examination and immunohistochemistry. The individual components were microdissected using a novel automated dissection system, and DNA was extracted and subjected to targeted exome sequencing.

RESULTS

A total of 10 cases of CSCLC were identified out of 170 cases with adequate histologic material; squamous cell carcinoma comprised the second component in half of these (n = 5). There were no significant differences between CSCLC and pure SCLC with respect to clinical features. The median follow-up time was 36 months. The median survival times of patients with pure SCLC and CSCLC were 58 months and 26 months, respectively (p = 0.030). The different components of three cases of CSCLC were deemed adequate for microdissection and sequencing. Approximately 75% of the identified somatic mutations were present in both components. There were also 15 gene mutations or six amplifications unique to only one of the components.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified no significant clinical or pathologic differences between pure SCLC and CSCLC; CSCLC was associated with decreased overall survival compared with pure SCLC. The histologic components of CSCLC had high genetic concordance but also showed divergent genotypes. These findings may suggest a common precursor with subsequent acquisition of oncogenic changes in CSCLC.

Clinical outcomes of surgically resected combined small cell lung cancer: a two-institutional experience

BACKGROUND

The combined small cell lung cancer (c-SCLC) was rare and its clinicopathological characteristics had not been thoroughly described. The aim of this study was to determine prognostic factors and survival in c-SCLC patients.

METHODS

Clinical records of patients with c-SCLC who underwent surgery between January 2009 and December 2013 in two institutions were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients were identified. The most common pathology was combined SCLC and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC, N=46), followed by combined SCLC and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (N=32), combined SCLC and adenocarcinoma (AC) (N=12), and combined SCLC and adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) (N=7). The overall survival (OS) rates of the entire cohort were 42.4% and 35.2% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified sex [female vs. male, hazards ratio (HR) =0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.19-0.79; P=0.010], age (<53 vs. >53 years, HR =0.28; 95% CI: 0.09-0.81; P=0.019), performance status (<2 vs. >2, HR =0.08; 95% CI: 0.02-0.32; P<0.001), combined non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) components (LCNEC vs. non-LCNEC, HR =3.00; 95% CI: 1.03-8.76; P=0.045), adjuvant therapy (yes vs. no, HR =0.33; 95% CI: 0.17-0.67; P=0.002) as significantly prognostic factors of OS in patients with complete resection and lymphadenectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The mixed NSCLC components within c-SCLCs had a significant influence on the survival. Compared with surgery alone, adjuvant therapy was associated with significantly improved survival in patients with complete resection and lymphadenectomy.

Further understanding of an uncommon disease of combined small cell lung cancer: clinical features and prognostic factors of 114 cases

Objective

Combined small cell lung cancer (C-SCLC) is an uncommon subgroup of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and few clinical data can be referred. Our study is to investigate the clinical features and prognostic factors of C-SCLC, as well as the role of multimodality treatment.

Methods

Between January 2004 and December 2012, patients with histologically diagnosed C-SCLC were retrospectively analyzed. The survivals were evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate potential prognostic factors.

Results

One hundred and fourteen patients were enrolled, with a median age of 59 (range: 20−79) years old. The most common combined component was squamous cell carcinoma (52.6%). Among these patients, the disease was stage I, II, III and IV in 9.6%, 19.3%, 46.5% and 24.6% of the patients, respectively. Eighty patients (70.2%) received at least two of the three modalities containing chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery. The median follow-up was 32.5 months. The median time of overall survival (OS) was 26.2 months. On univariate analysis, smoking (P=0.029), Karnofsky performance score (KPS) <80 (P=0.000), advanced TNM stage (P=0.000), no surgery (P=0.010), positive resection margin (P=0.000), positive lymph nodes ≥4 (P=0.000), positive lymph node ratio >10% (P=0.000) and non-multimodality treatment (P=0.004) were associated with poor OS. Multivariate analysis confirmed that smoking, advanced TNM stage, positive resection margin and positive lymph nodes ratio >10% were poor prognostic features.

Conclusions

C-SCLC has a relatively early stage and good prognosis, which may due to the underestimated diagnosis in non-surgical patients. Multimodality therapy is recommended, especially for limited disease. Smoking, advanced TNM stage, positive resection margin and positive lymph nodes ratio >10% are poor prognostic factors.

Prognostic significance of pretreatment laboratory parameters in combined small-cell lung cancer

Despite the increasing incidence of combined small-cell lung cancer (C-SCLC) in recent years, there have not been many data on clinical prognostic factors predicting prognosis of C-SCLC patients. In present study, we sought pretreatment features especially basic laboratory parameters predicting survival of C-SCLC. We analyzed 613 small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients at our institution between January 2005 and December 2010. We identified 114 patients with C-SCLC. The pathologic and clinical characteristics of these patients were reviewed. Data of laboratory parameters obtained during regular examinations at diagnosis of these patients were examined. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival rate and depict the survival curves. The Cox regression model was used to analyze the independent factors affecting the overall survival (OS). These data were compared with the results obtained from our 499 pure SCLC patients who presented during the same time period. Of the 613 SCLC patients analyzed, 18.6 % of the patients presented with C-SCLC. No difference in OS was observed in patients with C-SCLC and patients with pure SCLC (P = 0.995). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed that poor ECOG-PS (P < 0.001), extensive disease (P < 0.001), pathologic subtype of SC/LC (P < 0.001), not receiving surgery (P = 0.001), elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (P = 0.005), elevated NSE (P = 0.043), and elevated neutrophile-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (P = 0.018) were associated with adverse prognosis of patients with C-SCLC. By multivariate analysis, OS was affected by ECOG-PS (hazard ratio 2.001, P = 0.012), disease extent (hazard ratio 3.406, P < 0.001), and NLR (hazard ratio 1.704, P = 0.030) in C-SCLC patients, while the risk factors that influenced the prognosis of the patients with pure SCLC were ECOG-PS (hazard ratio 2.132, P < 0.001), disease extent (hazard ratio 1.482, P < 0.001), and LDH (hazard ratio 1.811, P < 0.001). Patients with C-SCLC carry a similar prognosis than those with pure small-cell variety. Easily accessible pretreatment parameters such as NLR should be considered in defining the prognosis of C-SCLC patients besides disease extent and performance status.

High pretreatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predicts recurrence and poor prognosis for combined small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUNDS

Compared to pure small cell lung cancer (SCLC), combined small cell lung cancer (C-SCLC) has its own characteristics. High neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been shown to be related to poor prognosis in several types of tumors. The aim of this study was to explore the prognosis value of NLR and PLR in patients with C-SCLC.

METHODS

A total of 112 patients diagnosed with C-SCLC between January 2000 and March 2009 were enrolled in the study. The clinicopathological parameters, laboratory analyses, and survival time were collected and analyzed. The correlation between NLR, PLR, and clinicopathological characters was analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the prognostic significance of these parameters for C-SCLC.

RESULTS

The pretreatment NLR was elevated in 37.5 % patients (NLR ≥ 4.15; n = 42; H-NLR). NLR was significantly related to disease stage (p = 0.033) and tumor recurrence (p = 0.014). The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were significantly worse in the H-NLR group (OS: 22.0 months vs 11.7 months, p = 0.001; PFS: 11.1 vs 6.0 months, p < 0.001). However, PLR at diagnosis was not associated with OS or PFS. Multivariate analyses indicated elevated NLR (HR = 1.6; p = 0.001), disease stage (HR = 1.6; p = 0.001), and performance status (HR = 1.8; p = 0.015) as independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

High pretreatment NLR (≥4.15) is a potential useful indicator for C-SCLC recurrence and predicts a poor long-term prognosis for C-SCLC, which should be considered in defining the prognosis with other well-known prognosticators in C-SCLC patients.

Prognosis of small cell lung cancer patients with diabetes treated with metformin

BACKGROUNDS

It has been reported that metformin has an anticancer impact in various solid tumors, but its role in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of metformin on survival in diabetic SCLC patients.

METHODS

A total of 79 SCLC patients with diabetes treated in our hospital between 2000 and 2010 were enrolled. The clinicopathological data and survival time were collected and evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to investigate the association between metformin use and the survival of SCLC.

RESULTS

Among the 79 diabetic patients, 36 patients took metformin. The median OS and DFS were significantly better in the metformin group compared to non-metformin group (OS 18.0 vs 11.5 months, p < 0.001; DFS 10.8 vs 6.5 months, p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that metformin use was an independent prognostic factor for long-term outcome (HR = 0.549, 95 % CI 0.198-0.978, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of SCLC patients with diabetes treated with metformin was improved, which might be considered a potential useful anticancer drug in treating SCLC patients.

Class III/IV POU transcription factors expressed in small cell lung cancer cells are involved in proneural/neuroendocrine differentiation

One-third of lung malignancies demonstrate a proneural/neuroendocrine phenotype or type of differentiation. However, it has not been clearly elucidated how proneural/neuroendocrine differentiation is controlled in lung cancers. We recently demonstrated that the POU3F2 gene plays a significant role in proneural/neuroendocrine differentiation of lung cancers. Because class III POU genes (POU3F1, POU3F2, POU3F3, and POU3F4) and class IV POU genes (POU4F1, POU4F2, and POU4F3) share similar properties in neural development, we analyzed the association between class III/IV POU genes and a proneural/neuroendocrine phenotype in lung cancers using seven small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines and twelve non-SCLC (NSCLC) cell lines. Class III/IV POU gene expression was generally restricted to SCLC cells. However, the forced expression of class III/IV POU genes in the NSCLC cell lines induced the expression of neuroendocrine-specific markers (neural call adhesion molecule 1, synaptophysin, and chromogranin A) and proneural transcription factors (achaete-scute homolog-like 1, NeuroD1, and thyroid transcription factor 1) in various degrees. Furthermore, each class III/IV POU gene induced other class III/IV POU genes, suggesting the mutual induction of class III/IV POU genes. These findings suggest that the expression of class III/IV POU genes is important for the proneural/neuroendocrine differentiation of lung cancer cells.

Etoposide-cisplatin alternating with vinorelbine-cisplatin versus etoposide-cisplatin alone in patients with extensive disease combined with small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of alternating etoposide-cisplatin and vinorelbine-cisplatin (EP-NP) compared with an etoposide-cisplatin (EP) regimen for advanced combined small cell carcinomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Histologically confirmed combined small cell carcinoma patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned (1:1) into either the EP-NP setting (group A) or the EP setting (group B). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in patients who received at least one dose of treatment.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients entered into this trial, 42 in group A and 40 in group B. The objective response rates in group A and group B were 42.9% and 32.5%, respectively (p=0.334). Survival analysis showed that median progression-free survival was 6.1 months in group A, which was significantly longer than the 4.1 months in group B (p=0.041). However, as to overall survival, no significant difference was found between the two groups (11.0 vs 10.1 months in groups A and B, respectively, p=0.545). No unexpected side effects were observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The EP-NP regimen for combined small cell carcinomas prolonged progression- free survival compared with the EP regimen. Further clinical investigations are warranted.

Elevated RABEX-5 protein expression predicts poor prognosis in combined small cell lung cancer

RABEX-5 has been studied in various solid tumors, but its role in combined small cell lung cancer (C-SCLC) remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the expression, the potential relevance to clinicopathological characters and prognostic significance of RABEX-5 in patients with C-SCLC. Fifty-two C-SCLC patients who received radical surgery were enrolled in our study. The clinicalpathological data and survival time were reviewed. The mRNA and protein expression of RABEX-5 from the paired tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues were determined, and its relationship with clinicalpathological variables and prognosis was analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the prognostic significance of RABEX-5 for C-SCLC. The mRNA and protein expression level of RABEX-5 was significantly elevated in C-SCLC tissues. The increased RABEX-5 protein expression was correlated with clinical stage (p = 0.011) and tumor recurrence (p = 0.006). The median OS and DFS was significantly shorter in the high RABEX-5 expression group compared to low RABEX-5 expression group (OS: 12.0 vs. 21.7 months, p = 0.014; DFS: 6.7 vs. 11.8 months, p = 0.005). Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that high RABEX-5 protein expression was an independent prognostic factor for OS and DFS (p < 0.001). RABEX-5 is a potential useful indicator and predicts a poor long-term prognosis for C-SCLC, which should be considered in defining the prognosis with other well-known prognosticators in C-SCLC patients.

Lysosome-associated protein transmembrane-4β-35 is a novel independent prognostic factor in small cell lung cancer

The lysosome-associated protein transmembrane-4β-35 (LAPTM4B-35) protein has been indicated to be involved in solid tumors, while its role in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the LAPTM4B-35 protein expression and its clinical and prognostic role in SCLC patients. A total of 88 SCLC patients who underwent radical surgery between 2002 and 2010 were enrolled in the study. The level of messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein was detected from the fresh paired tumor specimens and adjacent normal tissues. The clinicopathological and survival data were collected. And the relationship between LAPTM4B-35 and clinicopathological features was analyzed. The prognostic value of LAPTM4B-35 for SCLC was investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses. The LAPTM4B-35 was overexpressed significantly in SCLC cancer tissues. The elevated protein expression was correlated strongly with clinical stage (p = 0.012) and tumor recurrence (p = 0.023). The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) were significantly worse in the patients with high LAPTM4B-35 level. Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that high LAPTM4B-35 expression was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) and DFS (p = 0.017 vs p = 0.011). LAPTM4B-35 overexpression was an independent factor in SCLC prognosis, which may be considered a potential useful marker in defining the SCLC prognosis.