Real-World Treatment Patterns, Overall Survival, and Occurrence and Costs of Adverse Events Associated With Second-Line Therapies for Medicare Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Real-world treatment patterns, resource utilization and costs in biliary tract cancers in the USA

Aim: To evaluate real-world treatment patterns, survival and healthcare-resource utilization in US patients with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTC) receiving systemic therapy.Patients & methods: This study used claims data from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD®) linked to clinical data from the Cancer Care Quality Program (January 1, 2015-September 30, 2020).Results: Of 413 patients, 84.5% received gemcitabine-based first-line (1L) treatment, 46% received second-line treatment, and 16.5% received third-line (3L) treatment. All-cause mortality was 53% and approximately 70% of patients had ≥1 inpatient visit. The total mean per-patient-per-month all-cause costs were $19,589 for 1L and $33,534 for 3L treatment.Conclusion: Results showed poor survival, significant resource use and high costs as treatment line progresses for patients with advanced BTC.

CDK4/6 Inhibitor Efficacy in ESR1-Mutant Metastatic Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

In estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer, ESR1 mutations (ESR1m) are a common mechanism of acquired resistance to aromatase inhibitors (ArIh). However, the impact ESR1 alterations have on CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) sensitivity has not been established. Analyses of CDK4/6i trials suggest that the endocrine therapy partner and specific ESR1 allele may affect susceptibility. We analyzed a real-world data set to investigate CDK4/6i efficacy in ESR1m metastatic breast cancer and associated clinical factors.

METHODS

ESR1m were identified by analysis of circulating-tumor deoxyribonucleic acid. The GuardantINFORM database contains genomic information from tumors linked with claims data. Patients who started a CDK4/6i within 30 days of sequencing were categorized as having ESR1m or non-ESR1-mutant (non-ESR1m) breast cancer. Data were analyzed to determine the real-world time-to-next-treatment, defined as the start of a breast cancer treatment to initiation of the subsequent treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-five patients with ESR1m and 612 with non-ESR1m metastatic breast cancer were analyzed. ESR1m and non-ESR1m tumors had similar real-world time-to-next-treatment on CDK4/6i regimens (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.23). Duration on therapy in the first-line and second-line plus treatment settings were comparable regardless of ESR1 status. We stratified treatment duration by concurrent endocrine therapy, and patients with ESR1m had worse outcomes on ArIh but comparable real-world time-to-next-treatment on fulvestrant.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest ESR1 variants are not associated with pan-CDK4/6i resistance and are consistent with the hypothesis that CDK4/6 blockade combined with a selective estrogen receptor degrader is potentially an effective option for ESR1m metastatic breast cancer.

Real-World Data and Evidence in Lung Cancer: A Review of Recent Developments

Conventional cancer clinical trials can be time-consuming and expensive, often yielding results with limited applicability to real-world scenarios and presenting challenges for patient participation. Real-world data (RWD) studies offer a promising solution to address evidence gaps and provide essential information about the effects of cancer treatments in real-world settings. The distinction between RWD and data derived from randomized clinical trials lies in the method of data collection, as RWD by definition are obtained at the point of care. Experimental designs resembling those used in traditional clinical trials can be utilized to generate RWD, thus offering multiple benefits including increased efficiency and a more equitable balance between internal and external validity. Real-world data can be utilized in the field of pharmacovigilance to facilitate the understanding of disease progression and to formulate external control groups. By utilizing prospectively collected RWD, it is feasible to conduct pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) that can provide evidence to support randomized study designs and extend clinical research to the patient's point of care. To ensure the quality of real-world studies, it is crucial to implement auditable data abstraction methods and develop new incentives to capture clinically relevant data electronically at the point of care. The treatment landscape is constantly evolving, with the integration of front-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, affecting subsequent treatment lines. Real-world effectiveness and safety in underrepresented populations, such as the elderly and patients with poor performance status (PS), hepatitis, or human immunodeficiency virus, are still largely unexplored. Similarly, the cost-effectiveness and sustainability of these innovative agents are important considerations in the real world.

Treatment Patterns and Adverse Event-Related Hospitalization Among Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Mutated Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer After Treatment with EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Regimens

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) are established first-line treatments among patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR-sensitizing mutations. Upon EGFR TKI resistance, there are scant data supporting a standard of care in subsequent lines of therapy.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to characterize real-world treatment patterns and adverse events associated with hospitalization in later lines of therapy.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of administrative claims included adults with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer who initiated a next line of therapy (index line of therapy) following EGFR TKI and platinum-based chemotherapy discontinuation on/after 1 November, 2015. Treatment regimens and adverse event rates during the index line of therapy were described.

RESULTS

Among 195 eligible patients (median age: 59 years; female: 60%), the five most common index line of therapy regimens were immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy (29%), EGFR TKI monotherapy (21%), platinum-based chemotherapy (19%), non-platinum-chemotherapy (13%), and EGFR TKI combinations (9%). The overall median (95% confidence interval) time to discontinuation of the index line of therapy was 2.8 (2.1-3.2) months. Common adverse events associated with hospitalizations included infection/sepsis, pneumonia/pneumonitis, and anemia (2.9, 2.8, and 2.0 per 100 person-months, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Among EGFR TKI-resistant patients who discontinued platinum-based chemotherapy, the duration of the next line of therapy was short, treatment was highly variable, and re-treatment with EGFR TKIs and platinum-based regimens was common, suggesting a lack of standard of care in later lines. Adverse event rates associated with hospitalization were high, especially among platinum-treated patients. These results underscore the unmet need for new therapies in a later line of treatment to reduce the clinical burden among patients in this population.

Real-World Survival of First-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment Versus Chemotherapy in Older Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Synchronous Brain Metastases

PURPOSE

This study assessed real-world survival among older patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases (BMs) at diagnosis (synchronous BM [SBM]) receiving first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) compared with chemotherapy only.

METHODS

Patients with NSCLC and SBM age 65 years or older at diagnosis from 2010 to 2019 SEER-Medicare database and received US Food and Drug Administration-approved ICIs (pembrolizumab/nivolumab/ipilimumab/atezolizumab/durvalumab/cemiplimab) and/or chemotherapy (platinum-based doublets/taxane/pemetrexed/gemcitabine) as first-line systemic treatment were included, excluding those with no cranial radiation or ever being treated with targeted therapies. Overall survival time was from the start of systemic treatment (ICI/chemotherapy) to death, censored at disenrollment from Medicare part A/B, enrollment in part C, or end of the study period (December 31, 2019). Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves were compared between treatment groups using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model was used to estimate hazard ratio (HR) between groups, adjusting for patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

The study included 1,481 patients (1,303 chemotherapy and 178 ICI). The median (range) age was 71 (65-91) years. First-line ICI patients were more likely to be older, live in urban areas, and less likely to be non-White than the chemotherapy group. KM estimates showed that survival curves initially overlapped but diverged approximately 6 months after initiating first-line systemic treatment (median survival [95% CI]: ICI, 190 [131 to 303] days versus chemotherapy, 189 [177 to 201] days), with ICI showing a better survival than the chemotherapy group (log-rank test P < .0001). First-line ICI was associated with a lower risk of death compared with chemotherapy in adjusted CPH model (HR [95% CI], 0.67 [0.55 to 0.80]; P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Among older patients with NSCLC and SBM, first-line ICI use was associated with improved survival occurring 6 months after treatment initiation compared with chemotherapy only.

Clinical outcomes of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer after immunotherapy: a systematic literature review

Introduction

In the REVEL trial, ramucirumab plus docetaxel demonstrated significant improvements in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate (ORR) compared with placebo plus docetaxel for treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Since the approval of ramucirumab plus docetaxel, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), either as single agents or in combination with chemotherapy, have become the standard of care for first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. However, efficacy and safety data for ramucirumab plus docetaxel after prior ICI treatment from randomized controlled clinical studies are lacking.

Methods

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic literature review was performed. Electronic databases and select international oncology conference proceedings were searched. Studies published between 01 January 2014 and 01 July 2022, which evaluated 2 efficacy outcomes (and included at least 1 time-to-event endpoint) or safety outcomes of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in NSCLC that progressed after prior ICI treatment, were identified. Twelve studies were included in the analysis. Two treatment groups were selected: ramucirumab plus docetaxel after prior ICI ± chemotherapy (RAM + DTX ICI pre-treated) and ramucirumab plus docetaxel after prior chemotherapy only (RAM + DTX ICI naïve). OS, PFS, ORR, disease control rate (DCR), and safety data were extracted and descriptively summarized across both treatment groups.

Results

The pooled weighted median PFS and median OS were 5.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.9-6.8) and 11.2 months (95% CI: 7.5-17.5), respectively, in the RAM + DTX ICI pre-treated group and 3.8 months (95% CI: 2.3-4.1) and 13.5 months (95% CI: 8-24.0), respectively, in the RAM + DTX ICI naïve group. The ORR and DCR ranged from 20.9% to 60.0% and from 62.4% to 90.0%, respectively, in the RAM + DTX ICI pre-treated group and from 17.7% to 20.0% and from 57.1% to 75.0%, respectively, in the RAM + DTX ICI naïve group. The safety profile across studies was consistent between both treatment groups, and no new safety signals were reported.

Conclusions

Cumulatively, these results support the combination of ramucirumab plus docetaxel as an effective and safe subsequent therapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC with disease progression irrespective of previous ICI treatment.

Pan-Cancer Prevalence of Microsatellite Instability-High (MSI-H) Identified by Circulating Tumor DNA and Associated Real-World Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are approved for advanced solid tumors with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H). Although several technologies can assess MSI-H status, detection and outcomes with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-detected MSI-H are lacking. As such, we examined pan-cancer MSI-H prevalence across 21 cancers and outcomes after ctDNA-detected MSI-H.

METHODS

Patients with advanced cancer who had ctDNA testing (Guardant360) from October 1, 2018, to June 30, 2022, were retrospectively assessed for prevalence. GuardantINFORM, which includes anonymized genomic and structured payer claims data, was queried to assess outcomes. Patients who initiated new treatment within 90 days of MSI-H detection were sorted into immunotherapy included in treatment (IO) or no immunotherapy included (non-IO) groups. Real-world time to treatment discontinuation (rwTTD) and real-world time to next treatment (rwTTNT) were assessed in months as proxies of progression-free survival (PFS); real-world overall survival (rwOS) was assessed in months. Cox regression tests analyzed differences. Colorectal cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), prostate cancer, gastroesophageal cancer, and uterine cancer (UC) were assessed independently; all other cancers were grouped.

RESULTS

In total, 1.4% of 171,881 patients had MSI-H detected. Of 770 patients with outcomes available, rwTTD and rwTTNT were significantly longer for patients who received IO compared with non-IO for all cancers (P ≤ .05; hazard ratio [HR] range, 0.31-0.52 and 0.25-0.54, respectively) except NSCLC. rwOS had limited follow-up for all cohorts except UC (IO 39 v non-IO 23 months; HR, 0.18; P = .004); however, there was a consistent trend toward prolonged OS in IO-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

These data support use of a well-validated ctDNA assay to detect MSI-H across solid tumors and suggest prolonged PFS in patients treated with IO-containing regimens after detection. Tumor-agnostic, ctDNA-based MSI testing may be reliable for rapid decision making.

Emerging agents for the treatment of advanced or metastatic NSCLC without actionable genomic alterations with progression on first-line therapy

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in the world and the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as monotherapy or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, have emerged as the standard of care first-line treatment option for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without actionable genomic alterations (AGAs). Despite significant improvements in patient outcomes with these regimens, primary or acquired resistance is common and most patients develop disease progression, resulting in poor survival.

AREAS COVERED

We review the current treatments commonly used for NSCLC without AGAs in the first-line and subsequent settings and describe the unmet needs for these patients in the second-line setting, including a lack of standard definitions for primary and required resistance, and few effective treatment options for patients who develop progression of their disease on first-line therapy. We describe key mechanisms of resistance to ICIs and emerging therapies that are being investigated for patients who develop progression on ICIs and platinum-based chemotherapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Emerging agents in development have a variety of different mechanisms of action and will likely change standard of care for second-line therapy and beyond for patients with NSCLC without AGAs in the future.

Health outcomes and healthcare resource utilization among Veterans with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer treated with second-line chemotherapy versus immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Until recently, multi-agent chemotherapy (CT) was the standard of care for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Clinical trials have confirmed benefits in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival with immunotherapy (IO) compared to CT. This study compares real-world treatment patterns and outcomes between CT and IO administrations in second-line (2L) settings for patients with stage IV NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients in the United States Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare system diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC during 2012-2017 and receiving IO or CT in the 2L. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and adverse events (AEs) were compared between treatment groups. Logistic regression was used to examine differences in baseline characteristics between groups, and inverse probability weighting multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to analyze OS.

RESULTS

Among 4,609 Veterans who received first-line (1L) therapy for stage IV NSCLC, 96% received 1L CT alone. A total of 1,630 (35%) were administered 2L systemic therapy, with 695 (43%) receiving IO and 935 (57%) receiving CT. Median age was 67 years (IO group) and 65 years (CT group); most patients were male (97%) and white (76-77%). Patients administered 2L IO had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index than those administered CT (p = 0.0002). 2L IO was associated with significantly longer OS compared with CT (hazard ratio 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.94). IO was more frequently prescribed during the study period (p < 0.0001). No difference in rate of hospitalizations was observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the proportion of advanced NSCLC patients receiving 2L systemic therapy is low. Among patients treated with 1L CT and without IO contraindications, 2L IO should be considered, as this supports potential benefit of IO for advanced NSCLC. The increasing availability and indications for IO will likely increase the administration of 2L therapy to NSCLC patients.

Economic burden of advanced lung cancer patients treated by gefitinib alone and combined with chemotherapy in two regions of China

AIM

To assess the economic burden of different chemotherapies for lung cancer patients and influencing factors in China.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The economic burden of lung cancer, including direct, indirect and intangible costs was measured within three months after diagnosis and treatment. Direct cost included the cost of hospitalization, outpatient visits, out-of-pocket drug purchases, costs of transportation, accommodation and meal expenses while seeking treatments in hospitals. Cost information was attained from questionnaire and patients' medical record. Indirect cost was measured by the patients' and their caregivers' productive days lost due to outpatient visits and hospitalization for lung cancer treatment. Intangible cost was obtained through the willingness-to-pay method from a questionnaire completed by the patient.

RESULTS

Among the total cost of CNY71,401.92, direct cost, indirect cost and intangible cost constituted 89.02%, 4.29%, and 6.69% respectively. Educational level, occupation, family income, lung cancer classification, and the city of residence significantly influenced the total cost.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations in our study included: First, our follow-up period of three months was relatively short compared to the whole survival period of lung cancer patients. Second, the sample size of the chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy group was not large enough, and the cost data obtained would need confirmation in future studies. Third, participants came from only two localities, which may somewhat limit the representativeness of the study results for the whole of China.

CONCLUSIONS

The economic burden of lung cancer treatment mainly came from the cost of the drugs. Patients taking chemotherapy had significantly higher cost compared to patients using targeted therapy. The cost was generally higher for those with higher educational level, those with higher family income, and those living in an economically more developed city. Patients with NSCLC had higher cost compared to patients with SCLC.

How Do Treatment Preferences of Patients With Cancer Compare With Those of Oncologists and Family Members? Evidence From a Discrete Choice Experiment in China

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the treatment preference among oncologists, patients with lung cancer, and their family members in China.

METHODS

A face-to-face discrete choice experiment survey was conducted among oncologists, patients, and their family members. Participants completed 13 choice sets describing 6 key attributes, namely, overall survival time, risk of severe adverse effect, severity of pain, appetite, physical functioning status, and monthly cost. Mixed logit model and latent class analysis were used to estimate attribute level preference weights and the relative importance (RI) for attributes. The willingness to pay (WTP) and maximum acceptable risk (MAR) were also estimated. The RI, WTP, and MAR of oncologists, patients, and family members were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 121 oncologists and 161 dyads of patients and family members completed the survey. Overall survival time, physical functioning status, and pain were the 3 most important attributes across all 3 groups. Oncologists and family members had higher RI on overall survival time than patients (48% and 51% vs 38%). Patients had higher RI on physical functioning status and pain (23% and 14%) than oncologists (13% and 12%) and family members (16% and 11%). For extending survival, patients had the least WTP, and family members had the highest MAR. The latent class analysis identified 2 classes in the patient group and 3 classes in oncologist and family member groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There were differences in preferences for survival, risk, quality of life, and costs associated with cancer treatments among patients, oncologists, and family members. This finding highlights the need of involving patients in treatment decision making in China.

Efficacy and safety of befotertinib (D-0316) in patients with EGFR T790M mutated non-small cell lung cancer that had progressed after prior EGFR TKI therapy: A phase 2, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study

INTRODUCTION

Befotertinib (D-0316) is a novel, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). This study evaluated befotertinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who developed an EGFR T790M mutation after progression on first- or second-generation EGFR TKI therapy.

METHODS

This was a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study at 49 hospitals across mainland China. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR T790M mutations with disease progression following prior first- or second- generation EGFR TKI therapy received oral befotertinib of 50 mg (cohort A) or 75-100 mg (cohort B) once daily. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by an independent review committee (IRC) in intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03861156.

RESULTS

A total of 176 patients and 290 patients were included in cohorts A (50 mg) and B (75-100 mg), respectively. At data-cutoff (August 15, 2021), IRC-assessed ORR was 67.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 61.9%-72.9%) in cohort B. The investigator-assessed ORR was 54.0% (95% CI: 46.3%-61.5%) in cohort A and 65.9% (95% CI: 60.1%-71.3%) in cohort B. Investigator-assessed disease control rate was 93.2% (95% CI: 88.4%-96.4%) in cohort A and 94.8% (95% CI: 91.6%-97.1%) in cohort B. Investigator-assessed intracranial ORR was 26.7% (95% CI: 7.8%-55.1%) in cohort A and 57.1% (95% CI: 34.0%-78.2%) in cohort B. The median investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.0 (95% CI: 9.6-12.5) months in cohort A and 12.5 (95% CI: 11.1-13.8) months in cohort B. The median investigator-assessed intracranial PFS was 16.5 (95% CI: 8.6-not evaluable [NE]) months in cohort A and NE (95% CI: 13.8-NE) in cohort B. The overall survival was immature. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events and treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 20.5% and 11.4% of patients in cohort A, and in 29.3% and 10.0% of patients in cohort B, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Befotertinib of 75-100 mg has satisfying efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring T790M mutation with resistance to first- or second- generation EGFR TKIs. A phase 3 randomized trial is underway (NCT04206072).

Atezolizumab compared to chemotherapy for first-line treatment in non-small cell lung cancer with high PD-L1 expression: a cost-effectiveness analysis from US and Chinese perspectives

Background

The IMpower110 trial revealed that atezolizumab treatment had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with high-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. The purpose of the present study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus platinum-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment in metastatic NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression, from the perspective of US and Chinese payers.

Methods

A partitioned survival model was constructed based on information from the IMpower110 clinical trial to estimate cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of metastatic NSCLC. Costs were estimated from US and Chinese payer perspectives. The impact of uncertainty was explored by performing one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

Results

In the United States, treatment with atezolizumab was estimated to increase 0.87 quality adjusted life years (QALYs) at a cost of $123,424/QALY. In China, the use of atezolizumab cost an additional $68,489 compared with chemotherapy, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $78,936/QALY. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the cost of atezolizumab was the most influential factor in both countries.

Conclusions

In the United States, which had a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000 to $150,000 per QALY, atezolizumab was a cost-effective strategy for first-line treatment in metastatic NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 expression when compared to chemotherapy. For China, with a WTP threshold of $33,210 per QALY, atezolizumab was not considered good-value treatment for NSCLC, and a price reduction of 52% appeared to be justified.

An Automated Line-of-Therapy Algorithm for Adults With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Validation Study Using Blinded Manual Chart Review

BACKGROUND

Extraction of line-of-therapy (LOT) information from electronic health record and claims data is essential for determining longitudinal changes in systemic anticancer therapy in real-world clinical settings.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective cohort analysis is to validate and refine our previously described open-source LOT algorithm by comparing the output of the algorithm with results obtained through blinded manual chart review.

METHODS

We used structured electronic health record data and clinical documents to identify 500 adult patients treated for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with systemic anticancer therapy from 2011 to mid-2018; we assigned patients to training (n=350) and test (n=150) cohorts, randomly divided proportional to the overall ratio of simple:complex cases (n=254:246). Simple cases were patients who received one LOT and no maintenance therapy; complex cases were patients who received more than one LOT and/or maintenance therapy. Algorithmic changes were performed using the training cohort data, after which the refined algorithm was evaluated against the test cohort.

RESULTS

For simple cases, 16 instances of discordance between the LOT algorithm and chart review prerefinement were reduced to 8 instances postrefinement; in the test cohort, there was no discordance between algorithm and chart review. For complex cases, algorithm refinement reduced the discordance from 68 to 62 instances, with 37 instances in the test cohort. The percentage agreement between LOT algorithm output and chart review for patients who received one LOT was 89% prerefinement, 93% postrefinement, and 93% for the test cohort, whereas the likelihood of precise matching between algorithm output and chart review decreased with an increasing number of unique regimens. Several areas of discordance that arose from differing definitions of LOTs and maintenance therapy could not be objectively resolved because of a lack of precise definitions in the medical literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings identify common sources of discordance between the LOT algorithm and clinician documentation, providing the possibility of targeted algorithm refinement.

Real-World Utilization of Target- and Immunotherapies for Lung Cancer: A Scoping Review of Studies Based on Routinely Collected Electronic Healthcare Data

Routinely collected electronic healthcare data (rcEHD) have a tremendous potential for enriching pre-marketing evidence on target- and immunotherapies used to treat lung cancer (LC). A scoping review was performed to provide a structured overview of available rcEHD-based studies on this topic and to support the execution of future research by facilitating access to pertinent literature both for study design and benchmarking. Eligible studies published between 2016 and 2020 in PubMed and ISI Web of Science were searched. Data source and study characteristics, as well as evidence on drug utilization and survival were extracted. Thirty-two studies were included. Twenty-six studies used North American data, while three used European data only. Thirteen studies linked ≥1 data source types among administrative/claims data, cancer registries and medical/health records. Twenty-nine studies retrieved cancer-related information from medical records/cancer registries and 31 studies retrieved information on drug utilization or survival from medical records or administrative/claim data. Most part of studies concerned non-small-cell-LC patients (29 out of 32) while none focused on small-cell-LC. Study cohorts ranged between 85 to 81,983 patients. Only two studies described first-line utilization of immunotherapies. Results from this review will serve as a starting point for the execution of future rcEHD-based studies on innovative LC pharmacotherapies.

Evaluation of efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab combined with or without docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC

Background

The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and chemotherapy has been clinically confirmed to be beneficial as the first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. This study aimed to assess the effect of nivolumab + docetaxel versus nivolumab monotherapy in patients with NSCLC after the failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy.

Materials and methods

The efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab + docetaxel combination therapy versus nivolumab monotherapy were compared in this retrospective study. Primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.

Results

Between November 2017 and December 2019, 77 patients were included in this study, with 58 patients in the nivolumab group and 19 in the nivolumab + docetaxel group. The median follow-up was 18 months, and the PFS was 8 months for patients receiving nivolumab + docetaxel and 2 months for those receiving nivolumab alone (p = 0.001), respectively. Nivolumab + docetaxel showed superior OS compared with nivolumab, with the median OS unreached versus 7 months (p = 0.011). Among patients without EGFR/ALK variation, compared to nivolumab monotherapy, nivolumab + docetaxel showed better PFS (p = 0.04) and OS (p  = 0.05). There was no significant difference in grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) between the two groups (p = 0.253).

Conclusions

The combination of nivolumab and docetaxel demonstrated a meaningful improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival compared to nivolumab monotherapy, in patients with NSCLC after the failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy, irrespective of EGFR/ALK variation status.

Real-World Costs of Adverse Events in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common form of lung cancer in the United States. Immunotherapies and cytotoxic chemotherapies used to treat advanced NSCLC carry a substantial risk of adverse events (AEs), but real-world data on the incidence and costs associated with the unique AE profiles of these treatments are sparse.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the AE incidence and costs among patients initiating non-driver mutation-targeted first-line therapy for metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) in clinical practice.

METHODS

This was a retrospective administrative claims study conducted among commercial and Medicare Advantage health plan members who initiated first-line, nontargeted systemic anti-NSCLC therapy between January 1, 2008, and February 28, 2018. Patients were assigned to mutually exclusive treatment cohorts (cytotoxic chemotherapy [CHEM], immuno-oncology agents [IO], or immuno-oncology + cytotoxic chemotherapy [IO-CHEM]) and were observed from the index date (start of first-line therapy) through the earliest of health plan disenrollment, death, or March 31, 2018. AE incidence rates and associated health care costs were measured from the index date through the earliest of the start of a new therapy, 180 days after the end of first-line therapy, or the end of the study period. The factors influencing whether patients incurred high AE-related health care costs were assessed using multivariable models adjusted for patient demographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

The final study population (mean [SD] age 68.6 [9.5] years, 53.9% male) included 8,818 in the CHEM cohort, 482 in the IO cohort, and 412 in the IO-CHEM cohort. Overall, 74.4% had at least 1 AE during follow-up. The AE incidence rate was lowest for the IO cohort, with incidence rate ratios (95% CI) of 1.4 (1.3-1.6) for the CHEM cohort and 1.4 (1.2-1.6) for the IO-CHEM cohort. Mean AE-related costs were lowest for the IO cohort ($16,319) and highest for the CHEM cohort ($23,009; P < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, the odds of incurring any AE costs were similar for the IO and IO-CHEM cohorts compared with the CHEM cohort (OR = 0.82; P = 0.135 and OR = 0.98; P = 0.888, respectively). Among patients who incurred AE costs, those in the IO cohort were less likely than those in the CHEM cohort to have high costs (OR = 0.60; P = 0.030); the difference between the IO-CHEM and CHEM cohorts was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Among real-world patients initiating nontargeted first-line therapy for mNSCLC, those receiving immunotherapy experienced fewer AEs and had lower total AE-related costs than those treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Immunotherapy-treated patients were no more likely than chemotherapy-treated patients to incur AE-related costs and were less likely to have high AE costs if they incurred any at all. These findings indicate that immunotherapy-related AEs are not a differentiating factor in cost of care for this patient population in clinical practice.

DISCLOSURES

This study was sponsored by AstraZeneca. Ryan is an employee of AstraZeneca. Engel-Nitz, Johnson, and Bunner are employees of Optum, which was contracted by AstraZeneca to conduct this study, and shareholders in UnitedHealth Group. Engel-Nitz has also worked on cancer-related studies for which Optum received funding from Bayer AG, Clovis Oncology, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Exact Sciences, Janssen, and Novartis. Johnson worked on cancer-related studies for which Optum received funding from Eli Lilly, Medtronic, Sanofi, and UnitedHealthcare. Bunner has worked on cancer-related studies for which Optum received funding from Celgene and Incyte.

Navigating Diagnostic and Treatment Decisions in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Expert Commentary on the Multidisciplinary Team Approach

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately one in five cancer-related deaths, and management requires increasingly complex decision making by health care professionals. Many centers have therefore adopted a multidisciplinary approach to patient care, using the expertise of various specialists to provide the best evidence-based, personalized treatment. However, increasingly complex disease staging, as well as expanded biomarker testing and multimodality management algorithms with novel therapeutics, have driven the need for multifaceted, collaborative decision making to optimally guide the overall treatment process. To keep up with the rapidly evolving treatment landscape, national-level guidelines have been introduced to standardize patient pathways and ensure prompt diagnosis and treatment. Such strategies depend on efficient and effective communication between relevant multidisciplinary team members and have both improved adherence to treatment guidelines and extended patient survival. This article highlights the value of a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and staging, treatment decision making, and adverse event management in NSCLC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This review highlights the value of a multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis and staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and makes practical suggestions as to how multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) can be best deployed at individual stages of the disease to improve patient outcomes and effectively manage common adverse events. The authors discuss how a collaborative approach, appropriately leveraging the diverse expertise of NSCLC MDT members (including specialist radiation and medical oncologists, chest physicians, pathologists, pulmonologists, surgeons, and nursing staff) can continue to ensure optimal per-patient decision making as treatment options become ever more specialized in the era of biomarker-driven therapeutic strategies.

Downregulation of breast cancer resistance protein by long-term fractionated radiotherapy sensitizes lung adenocarcinoma to SN-38

Chemotherapy is usually the subsequent treatment for non-small cell lung cancer patients with acquired radioresistance after long-term fractionated radiotherapy. However, few studies have focused on the selection of chemotherapeutic drugs to treat lung adenocarcinoma patients with radioresistance. Our study compared the sensitivity changes of lung adenocarcinoma cells to conventional chemotherapeutic drugs under radioresistant circumstances by using three lung adenocarcinoma cell models, which were irradiated with fractionated X-rays at a total dose of 60 Gy. The results showed that the toxicities of paclitaxel, docetaxel and SN-38 were increased in radioresistant cells. The IC₅₀ values of docetaxel and SN-38 decreased 0 ~ 3 times and 3 ~ 36 times in radioresistant cells, respectively. Notably, the A549 radioresistant cells were approximately 36 times more sensitive to SN-38 than the parental cells. Further results revealed that the downregulation of the efflux transporter BCRP by long-term fractionated irradiation was an important factor contributing to the increased cytotoxicity of SN-38. In addition, the reported miRNAs and transcriptional factors that regulate BCRP did not participate in the downregulation. In conclusion, these results presented important data on the sensitivity changes of lung adenocarcinoma cells to chemotherapeutic drugs after acquiring radioresistance and suggested that irinotecan (the prodrug of SN-38) might be a promising drug candidate for lung adenocarcinoma patients with acquired radioresistance.

Novel prospective umbrella-type lung cancer registry study for clarifying clinical practice patterns: CS-Lung-003 study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Conventional cancer registries are suitable for simple surveillance of cancer patients, including disease frequency and distribution, demographics, and prognosis; however, the collected data are inadequate to clarify comprehensively diverse clinical questions in daily practice.

METHODS

We constructed an umbrella-type lung cancer patient registry (CS-Lung-003) integrating multiple related prospective observational studies (linked studies) that reflect clinical questions about lung cancer treatment. The primary endpoint of this registry is to clarify daily clinical practice patterns in lung cancer treatment; a key inclusion criterion is pathologically diagnosed lung cancer. Under this registry, indispensable clinical items are detected in advance across all active linked studies and gathered prospectively and systematically to avoid excessive or insufficient data collection. Researchers are to input information mutually, irrespective of the relevance to each researcher's own study. Linked studies under the umbrella of the CS-Lung-003 registry will be updated annually with newly raised clinical questions; some linked studies will be newly created, while others will be deleted after the completion of the analysis. Enrollment began in July 2017.

DISCUSSION

We successfully launched the umbrella-type CS-Lung-003 registry. Under this single registry, researchers collaborate on patient registration and data provision for their own and other studies. Thus, the registry will produce results for multiple domains of study, providing answers to questions about lung cancer treatment raised by other researchers. Through such analysis of each linked study, this registry will contribute to the comprehensive elucidation of actual daily practice patterns in lung cancer treatment.

KEY POINTS

CS-Lung-003 registry directly integrates multiple linked studies created under the umbrella of this cancer registry to solve various clinical questions regarding daily practice patterns of lung cancer treatment.

Cost of Quality Pilot: A Systematic Methodology for Examining the Cost of Pressure Injury

Health care costs in the United States are considerable, and total national cost of preventable adverse events in the United States ranges from billions to trillions of dollars annually. Achieving the highest quality of health services requires delivering care that mitigates the risk of patient adverse events. Pressure injuries are a significant and costly adverse event. Mitigating or eliminating harm from pressure injuries not only improves quality and increases patient safety but also decreases costs of care. The purpose of this article is to pilot a systematic methodology for examining the differences in the cost of care for a subset of patients with and without hospital-acquired pressure injuries in an acute care setting.

A microsimulation model to assess the economic impact of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction

Immunotherapy has become the standard of care in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to quantify the economic impact, in France, of anti-PD-1 therapy for NSCLC.

Methods

We used patient-level data from the national ESCAP-2011-CPHG cohort study to estimate time to treatment failure and mean cost per patient for the four label indications approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for NSCLC in May 2018. To compute the budget impact, we used a microsimulation model to estimate the target populations of anti-PD-1 therapy over a 3-year period, which were combined with the annual cost of treatment.

Results

Overall, 11 839 patients with NSCLC were estimated to be eligible for anti-PD-1 therapy 3 years after the introduction of anti-PD-1 therapies. The mean annual cost per patient in the control group ranged from €2671 (95% CI €2149–3194) to €6412 (95% CI €5920–6903) across the four indications. The mean annual cost of treatment for the four EMA-approved indications of anti-PD-1 therapy was estimated to be €48.7 million in the control group and at €421.8 million in the immunotherapy group. The overall budget impact in 2019 is expected to amount to €373.1 million. In the sensitivity analysis, flat doses and treatment effect had the greatest influence on the budget impact.

Conclusion

Anti-PD-1 agents for NSCLC treatment are associated with a substantial economic burden.

Anti-PD-1 agents for NSCLC treatment are associated with a substantial economic burdenhttp://bit.ly/2SDXZw0

Real-world treatment and survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung Cancer: a German retrospective data analysis

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to describe the real-world treatment and overall survival (OS) of German patients with a diagnosis of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), and to explore factors associated with the real-world mortality risk.

METHODS

This was a retrospective German claims data analysis of incident aNSCLC patients. Data were available from 01/01/2011 until 31/12/2016. Identification of eligible patients took place between 01/01/2012-31/12/2015, to allow for at least 1-year pre-index and follow-up periods. Inpatient and outpatient mutation test procedures after aNSCLC diagnosis were observed. Further, prescribed treatments and OS since first (incident) aNSCLC diagnosis and start of respective treatment lines were described both for all patients and presumed EGFR/ALK/ROS-1-positive patients. Factors associated with OS were analyzed in multivariable Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 1741 aNSCLC patients were observed (mean age: 66·97 years, female: 29·87%). The mutation test rate within this population was 26·31% (n = 458), 26·6% of these patients (n = 122) received a targeted treatment and were assumed to have a positive EGFR/ALK/ROS-1 test result. Most often prescribed treatments were pemetrexed monotherapy as 1 L (21·23% for all and 11·11% for mutation-positive patients) and erlotinib monotherapy as 2 L (25·83%/38·54%). Median OS since incident diagnosis was 351 days in all and 571 days in mutation-positive patients. In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, higher age, a stage IV disease, a higher number of chronic drugs in the pre-index period and no systemic therapy increased the risk of early death since first aNSCLC diagnosis. On the other hand, female gender and treatment with therapies other than chemotherapy were associated with a lower risk of early death.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the introduction of new treatments, the real-world survival prognosis for aNSCLC patients remains poor if measured based on an unselected real-world population of patients. Still, the majority of German aNSCLC patients do not receive a mutation test.

Economic burden of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving nivolumab versus chemotherapy in China

Aim: As new treatment patterns are gradually being used in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, it is necessary to have a better understanding of real-world data on clinical practices and their potential impact on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). Patients & methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted with electronic medical records from Shanghai Chest Hospital. Hospitalized patients treated with nivolumab or second-line chemotherapy were included. Results: A total of 296 patients were included in this study, of whom 187 were treated with nivolumab. About 74.33% received nivolumab monotherapy at different doses. The mean cost of nivolumab was $3334.14 (±86.69). Nivolumab decreased inpatient days to 1.9545 days with a more stable cost and HCRU per cycle. Conclusion: Nivolumab is expensive but it reduces other HCRU.

Potential Antiangiogenic Treatment Eligibility of Patients with Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: EPISQUAMAB Study (GFPC 2015-01)

BACKGROUND

Antiangiogenic agents have improved the prognosis of non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), even though all the patients are not eligible to receive them because of counterindications linked to the tumor's characteristics or comorbidities. Much less information is available about the eligibility of patients with squamous non-small-cell lung cancers (SQ-NSCLCs) to receive antivascular endothelial growth-factor (VEGF) treatments, even though such molecules are being developed for this histology. This study was undertaken to determine the percentage of advanced SQ-NSCLC patients who would be eligible to receive an antiVEGF agent as second-line systemic therapy.

METHODS

This observational, multicenter, prospective study evaluated advanced SQ-NSCLC patients' criteria for ineligibility to receive an antiVEGF during a multidisciplinary meeting to choose their standard second-line systemic therapy.

RESULTS

Among the 317 patients included, 53.6% had at least one ineligibility criterion, and ~20% had at least two, with disease extension to large vessels (39.8%), tumor cavitation (20.5%), cardiovascular disease (11%) and/or hemoptysis (7.2%) being the most frequent. Patients with an ECOG performance score of 1/2 had more cardiovascular contraindications that those with scores of 0.

CONCLUSION

Almost half of the SQ-NSCLC patients included in this study would have been eligible to receive an antiVEGF agent. The development of these molecules for these indications should be encouraged.

Cost–effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in the USA

Aim: This analysis aimed to evaluate the cost–effectiveness of pembrolizumab monotherapy as first-line treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score ≥1% from a US payer perspective. Materials & methods: A partitioned survival model was developed using efficacy and safety data from the KEYNOTE-042 trial and projected over 20 years. Costs accounted for treatment, toxicity and disease management. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost–effectiveness ratios were reported. Results: Pembrolizumab resulted in an expected gain of 0.60 life years and 0.49 QALYs compared with platinum-based chemotherapy. The incremental cost–effectiveness ratio was US$130,155/QALY. Conclusion: Pembrolizumab is projected to be cost-effective compared with platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥1%.

Temporal phenotyping by mining healthcare data to derive lines of therapy for cancer

Lines of therapy (LOT) derived from real-world healthcare data not only depict real-world cancer treatment sequences, but also help define patient phenotypes along the course of disease progression and therapeutic interventions. The sequence of prescribed anticancer therapies can be defined as temporal phenotyping resulting from changes in morphological (tumor staging), biochemical (biomarker testing), physiological (disease progression), and behavioral (physician prescribing and patient adherence) parameters. We introduce a novel methodology that is a two-part approach: 1) create an algorithm to derive patient-level LOT and 2) aggregate LOT information via clustering to derive temporal phenotypes, in conjunction with visualization techniques, within a large insurance claims dataset. We demonstrated the methodology using two examples: metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and metastatic melanoma. First, we generated a longitudinal patient cohort for each cancer type and applied a set of rules to derive patient-level LOT. Then the LOT algorithm outputs for each cancer type were visualized using Sankey plots and K-means clusters based on durations of LOT and of gaps in therapy between LOT. We found differential distribution of temporal phenotypes across clusters. Our approach to identify temporal patient phenotypes can increase the quality and utility of analyses conducted using claims datasets, with the potential for application to multiple oncology disease areas across diverse healthcare data sources. The understanding of LOT as defining patients' temporal phenotypes can contribute to continuous health learning of disease progression and its interaction with different treatment pathways; in addition, this understanding can provide new insights that can be applied by tailoring treatment sequences for the patient phenotypes who will benefit.

Sequential therapy with ramucirumab and/or checkpoint inhibitors for non-small-cell lung cancer in routine practice

Aim: To describe treatment patterns and outcomes for advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) treated with single-agent or combination ramucirumab (ramucirumab-based) and/or immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI-based) therapy. Materials & methods: Retrospective study of aNSCLC patients (n = 4054) identified in the Flatiron Health database, who received at least two treatment lines including ramucirumab- and/or ICI-based regimens between December 2014 and May 2017. Results: Median overall survival (95% CI) from aNSCLC diagnosis was 29.3 (25.5-33.0) months for patients receiving sequential ramucirumab- and ICI-based therapy (n = 245), 15.1 (12.6-18.2) months for patients receiving sequences including ramucirumab- without ICI-based therapy (n = 112), and 23.1 (21.9-24.2) months for patients receiving ICI-based therapy without ramucirumab-based therapy in sequence (n = 3697). Conclusion: Results provide real-world survival estimates for aNSCLC treated with sequences including ramucirumab- and/or ICI-based therapies.

Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy and pembrolizumab monotherapy in the first-line treatment of squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in the US

Objective: To describe the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel; P + C) in metastatic, squamous, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in the US. Methods: A model comparing P + C versus C alone is developed utilizing partitioned survival analysis. Primary clinical efficacy, treatment utilization, health utility and safety data are derived from the KEYNOTE-407 trial and projected over 20 years. Costs for drugs and non-drug disease management are also incorporated. Additionally, the cost-effectiveness of P + C vs. pembrolizumab monotherapy (P) is evaluated via an indirect treatment comparison, for patient subgroups with PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) ≥ 50% and 1-49%. Results: Overall, P + C is projected to increase life expectancy by 1.95 years vs. C (3.86 versus 1.91). The resultant ICER is $86,293/QALY. In patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, 1-49% and <1 the corresponding incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) are $99,777/QALY, $85,986/QALY and $87,507/QALY, respectively. Versus P, in the PD-L1 ≥ 50% subgroup, P + C appears cost saving; however, this result should be interpreted with caution as there is considerable uncertainty in the relative efficacy of these comparators. Conclusions: Across all eligible patients, the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy is projected to approximately double life expectancy, yielding an extension to a point not previously seen in metastatic squamous NSCLC. Overall, and within all relevant PD-L1 subgroups, use of P + C yields an ICER below $100,000/QALY, and can be a cost-effective first-line treatment for eligible metastatic squamous NSCLC patients for whom chemotherapy is currently administered. In the PD-L1 ≥ 50% subgroup, additional follow-up within trials of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and pembrolizumab monotherapy are needed to better define cost-effectiveness between these comparators.

Economic burden of chemotherapy-treated recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in France: real-world data from the permanent sample of national health insurance beneficiaries

Aims: Overall survival (OS) of patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is extremely poor. New therapeutic options emerge but need to establish their economic value. The objective was to describe the direct and related costs of R/M SCCHN in France. Materials and methods: We selected all adult patients treated with chemotherapy for R/M SCCHN between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2014 from the permanent sample of the French national health insurance database (EGB). Data were analyzed from the index date (first chemotherapy) until patients' death or 31 December 2015. "Treatment period" and "end-of-life" (EoL) (from last chemotherapy until death) were distinguished. Costs included all hospitalizations for SCCHN and ambulatory care. Costs of hospitalized and non-hospitalized adverse events (AEs) were estimated. Results: Among 267 patients identified, 85% were men, 44% had metastases at the index date and the mean age was 62.0 years (±9.9). The most common tumor location was oropharynx (29%) but 39% of patients had multiple locations. Median OS was 9.3 (95% CI: 7.9-11.8) months for the overall population. The average total direct cost per patient was €49,954, broken down into €32,908 (95% CI: 29,525-36,290) for hospitalizations and €17,047 (14,941-19,152) for ambulatory care. Main cost drivers were drug acquisition and administration (€14,538) during the treatment period (209 days on average) and palliative care (€3,750) during the EoL period (125 days). Regarding related costs, around 12% of patients received disability pensions (€1,397 per patient [624-2,171]) and sick leave payments (€1,592 [888-2,297]). "Metabolism and nutrition disorders" and "Infections and infestations" were the most expensive hospitalized AEs (€1,513 and €1,180 per patient, respectively). Febrile neutropenia was the most expensive non-hospitalized AE (€766 per patient). Conclusions: This analysis of real-world data confirms the poor prognosis of patients with R/M SCCHN and provides cost data for future economic evaluations.

I-O Optimise: a novel multinational real-world research platform in thoracic malignancies

Aim: To describe I-O Optimise, a multinational program providing real-world insights into lung cancer management. Materials & methods: Real-world data source selection for I-O Optimise followed a structured approach focused on population coverage, key variable capture, continuous/consistent data availability, record duration and data latency, and database expertise. Results: As of 31 October 2018, seven real-world data sources were included in I-O Optimise, providing data on characteristics, treatment patterns and clinical outcomes from more than 45,000 patients/year with non-small-cell lung cancer, small-cell lung cancer and mesothelioma across Denmark, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the UK. Conclusion: The ongoing I-O Optimise initiative has the potential to provide a broad, robust and dynamic research platform to continually address numerous research objectives in the lung cancer arena.

Real-World Treatment Patterns, Overall Survival, and Occurrence and Costs of Adverse Events Associated With First-line Therapies for Medicare Patients 65 Years and Older With Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

This study sought to better understand real-world treatment patterns, overall and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-specific survival, adverse event (AE) occurrence, and economic impact of first-line cancer therapies in Medicare patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study identified patients ≥ 65 years in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database who received a first-time advanced (stage IV) NSCLC diagnosis from 2007 to 2011, and who received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy from 2007 through mid-2013. First-line regimens, healthcare resource use, occurrence of AEs, and associated costs (2013 US dollars) were analyzed. Median survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Surprisingly, only 46% of patients (n = 13,472) with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC received systemic therapy, and 5931 received platinum-based therapy. The mean age was 73 years, with 3354 (57%) males; 1489 (25%) had squamous and 4442 (75%) nonsquamous histology. The most common regimens were carboplatin doublets (70%), including carboplatin/paclitaxel (38%), carboplatin/pemetrexed (12%), carboplatin/gemcitabine (11%), and carboplatin/docetaxel (7%). The median overall survival from first-line therapy initiation was 7.2 months (95% confidence interval, 7.0-7.5 months). Dyspnea and anemia were the most common AEs of interest, whereas atypical pneumonia was associated with the greatest AE-related costs (mean, $5044). The mean total per-patient-per-month cost was $11,909, with AE-related costs comprising 9% of total costs. The highest costs and survival were observed for patients treated with carboplatin/pemetrexed and bevacizumab/carboplatin/paclitaxel.

CONCLUSIONS

These real-world data illustrate the most common first-line regimens by histology, overall survival, AEs, and some of the high AE-related costs of therapy for advanced NSCLC, and provides extremely useful information for clinicians.