Clinical efficacy and safety in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic literature review

EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 health utilities scores of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients in China

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of persons with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) by using EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 and compares the measurement properties of the two instruments.

METHOD

DLBCL patients were identified via a patient group and were surveyed using web-based questionnaires. Demographic information, socioeconomic status (SES), clinical characteristics, and EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 responses were collected and statistically described. The association between the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 dimensions were analyzed using the Spearman's correlation coefficient, whereas the correlation of the utility scores was evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient. The agreement between the responses of the two instruments were examined using a Bland-Altman (B-A) plot. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare the utility scores across subgroups in different clinical states (a t-test was used if there were two subgroups). In addition, the graded response model (GRM) was used to describe the discrimination ability and difficulty characteristics of the dimensions in the two instruments.

RESULTS

In total, 582 valid responses were collected, among which 477 respondents were associated with initial-treatment and 105 respondents were relapsed/refractory (RR) patients. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 utility scores of the DLBCL patients were 0.828 (0.222) and 0.641 (0.220), respectively. The correlation between the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 dimensions ranged from 0.299 to 0.680, and the correlation between their utility scores was 0.787. The B-A plot demonstrated an acceptable but not strong agreement between EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 utility scores. The GRM model results indicated that all dimensions of each instrument were highly discriminating overall, but EQ-5D-5L had suboptimal discriminative power among patients with good health.

CONCLUSION

Both the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 showed valid properties to assess the HRQoL of DLBCL patients. However, utility scores derived from the two instruments had substantial difference, thereby prohibiting the interchangeable use of utilities from the two instruments.

Advances in diagnosis, treatment and prognostic factors of gastrointestinal DLBCL

Gastrointestinal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (GI-DLBCL) is an extremely aggressive form of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (BNHL) which has complex histological characteristics and manifests a high degree of heterogeneity in terms of clinical, morphological, immunological, and genetic features. GI-DLBCL mainly spreads by infiltrating neighboring lymph nodes, and common gastrointestinal complications (GICS) such as obstruction, perforation, or bleeding, frequently arise during the progression of the disease, posing significant challenges in both diagnosing and treating the condition. Meanwhile, the incidence of GI-DLBCL has been gradually increasing in recent years, and its strong invasiveness makes it prone to being misdiagnosed or completely missed. In clinical practice, over half of the patients diagnosed with the disease are in stage III or stage IV. What makes it worse is that certain patients may not exhibit a favorable response to chemotherapy. All these lead to intricacies in management of this disease. Unfortunately, there is currently no large prospective study or evidence-based medical evidence to provide clear guidance on treatment decisions for this specific type of lymphoma. Neither do physicians have a consensus regarding the optimal approach to address this condition. Recent studies have identified the presence of various prognostic factors that significantly impact survival in GI-DLBCL, which demonstrates the unique particularity of GI-DLBCL, and could help optimize the clinical decision.

Identification and overcoming rituximab resistance in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma using next-generation sequencing

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Although rituximab, an antiCD20 monoclonal antibody, has dramatically improved the clinical outcomes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, rituximab resistance remains a challenge.

METHODS

We developed a rituximab-resistant cell line (RRCL) by sequential exposure to gradually increasing concentrations of rituximab in a rituximab-sensitive cell line (RSCL). When the same dose of rituximab was administered, RRCL showed a smaller decrease in cell viability and apoptosis than RSCL. To determine the differences in gene expression between RSCL and RRCL, we performed next-generation sequencing.

RESULTS

In total, 1,879 differentially expressed genes were identified, and in the over-representation analysis of Consensus-PathDB, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway showed statistical significance. MAPK13, which encodes the p38δ protein, was expressed more than four-fold in RRCL. Western blot analysis revealed that phosphop38 expression mainwas increased in RRCL, and when p38 inhibitor was administered, phosphop38 expression was significantly decreased. Therefore, we hypothesized that p38 MAPK activation was associated with rituximab resistance. Previous studies have suggested that p38 is associated with NF-κB activation. Deferasirox has been reported to inhibit NF-κB activity and suppress phosphorylation of the MAPK pathway. Furthermore, it also has cytotoxic effects on various cancers and synergistic effects in overcoming drug resistance. In this study, we confirmed that deferasirox induced dose-dependent cytotoxicity in both RSCL and RRCL, and the combination of deferasirox and rituximab showed a synergistic effect in RRCL at all combination concentrations.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that p38 MAPK, especially p38δ, activation is associated with rituximab resistance, and deferasirox may be a candidate to overcome rituximab resistance.

Augmented ICE in Patients With Poor-Risk Refractory and Relapsed Lymphomas

BACKGROUND

In patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma after first line therapy, chemosensitivity to salvage chemotherapy is the main determinant of outcome pre-autologous stem cell transplant . With novel therapies not yet widely available and poor responses to conventional dose salvage therapy such as ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) in patients with early relapse within 12 months and primary refractory disease, there is capacity to dose intensify ifosfamide and etoposide (augmented ICE).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients who received augmented ICE between 2010 and 2020 and report on response, deliverability, toxicities, and outcome. Patients were transplant eligible with diffuse large-B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) with refractory disease or relapse within 12 months. Dose of augmented ICE versus standard ICE was ifosfamide 10 versus 5 g/m² and etoposide 600 versus 300 mg/m². Carboplatin dose with a calculated area under curve of 5 was unchanged. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody was given in patients with CD20 positive lymphoma. Responding patients who achieved complete response or partial response proceeded to transplant.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients with DLBCL (n = 13) and HL (n = 8) received augmented ICE. Nineteen of 21 completed 2 cycles. Overall response rates were 85% (DLBCL) and 100% (HL). Most patients required transfusion, 2 developed reversible ifosfamide encephalopathy and 86% febrile neutropenia. Eighteen patients proceeded to transplant. 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in DLBCL were 62% and 45%, and in HL, 100% and 88%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Augmented ICE is associated with high response rate and transplant realization at the expense of toxicity.

Proton Therapy as a Bridging Treatment in CAR T-Cell Therapy for Relapsed and Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Is There a Role?

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Since the relapse rate of DLBCL to frontline chemoimmunotherapy and salvage autologous hematopoietic cell transplant is high, CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy was adopted. Given the time interval needed for CAR T cells to be manufactured (3-5 weeks) and the aggressiveness of these relapsed/refractory lymphomas, some patients do not make it to the CAR T-cell infusion phase. This calls for a bridging therapy to control, debulk, and sensitize the disease during this period. Radiation therapy can serve this purpose and has shown promising results in some studies. Proton therapy, compared to standard radiation therapy, in some locations, can reduce the radiation dose to the organs at risk, which may lead to fewer side effects for patients with lymphomas. Thus, we hypothesize that proton therapy may serve as a promising bridging strategy to CAR T-cell therapy for some patients.

Treatment of aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma beyond frontline therapy in patients not eligible for stem cell transplantation: a structured review

Aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (aNHL) accounts for ∼50% of all NHL cases. The only potentially curative, broadly available treatment for patients with relapse, failing frontline treatment, is high-dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT); patients ineligible for/who have failed ASCT have limited standard-of-care options. We conducted a structured review of treatments for relapsed/refractory patients with aNHL based on literature published between 2006 and 2017. Of the 22 publications identified for inclusion, most described phase II, single-arm trials (N = 25-217), and only three were randomized studies (phase II [N = 96], phase II/III [N = 111] and phase III [N = 338]). The majority of treatments evaluated resulted in only modest efficacy (median progression-free survival, 2.1-20.0 months) and ultimately poor health outcomes (median overall survival, 25 weeks-15.5 months). In conclusion, there is an unmet need for novel, effective, and tolerable treatments for patients with relapsed/refractory aNHL who are ineligible for/have failed ASCT.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Therapy: Practical Considerations for Implementation in Europe

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is a new class of cellular immunotherapies that involves ex vivo genetic modification of T cells to incorporate an engineered CAR. After infusion into the patient, the CAR-expressing T cells recognize specific tumor targets and induce an immune response against them. The technology utilized is fundamentally different from previously available cancer treatments. Currently, most CAR-T cell therapies use autologous T cells. Tisagenlecleucel (formerly CTL019) is an anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy that was recently approved in the United States for the treatment of pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Tisagenlecleucel has shown robust in vivo expansion and long-term persistence, clinically meaningful durable response and remission rates, and overall survival benefit in pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL and in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Common adverse events (AEs) include cytokine release syndrome, which may require hospitalization and admission to an intensive care unit, neurological toxicities, and B-cell aplasia. These AEs are manageable when treated by an appropriately trained team. Additional research is required to further develop AE management protocols. In this review, we describe regulatory requirements, clinical considerations, and site-level requirements for clinical study implementation of CAR-T cell therapy in Europe. We also provide a case study of the European experience from the first global clinical trial for tisagenlecleucel, which may serve as a useful starting point for investigators and clinicians looking to implement CAR-T cell therapy at their institutions.

CUDC-907 in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, including patients with MYC-alterations: results from an expanded phase I trial

CUDC-907 is a first-in-class, oral small molecule inhibitor of both HDAC (class I and II) and PI3K (class Iα, β, and δ) enzymes, with demonstrated anti-tumor activity in multiple pre-clinical models, including MYC-driven ones. In this report, we present the safety and preliminary activity results of CUDC-907, with and without rituximab, in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with a particular focus on those with MYC-altered disease. Thirty-seven DLBCL patients were enrolled, 14 with confirmed MYC-altered disease. Twenty-five patients received monotherapy treatment, and 12 received the combination of CUDC-907 with rituximab. CUDC-907 monotherapy and combination demonstrated similar safety profiles consisting primarily of Grade 1/2 hematologic and gastrointestinal events. The most frequently reported Grade ≥3 treatment-related events were thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, diarrhea, fatigue, and anemia. Eleven responses (5 complete responses and 6 partial responses) were reported, for a response rate of 37% (11 out of 30) in evaluable patients [30% (11 out of 37) including all patients]. The objective response rate in evaluable MYC-altered DLBCL patients was 64% (7 out of 11; 4 complete responses and 3 partial responses), while it was 29% (2 out of 7) in MYC unaltered, and 17% (2 out of 12) in those with unknown MYC status. Median duration of response was 11.2 months overall; 13.6 months in MYC-altered patients, 6.0 months in MYC unaltered, and 7.8 months in those with MYC status unknown. The tolerable safety profile and encouraging evidence of durable anti-tumor activity, particularly in MYC-altered patients, support the continued development of CUDC-907 in these populations of high unmet need. (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 01742988).

Second-line therapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): treatment patterns and outcomes in older patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy

Using SEER-Medicare linked data we identified elderly patients diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) between January 2000 and December 2007 who received second-line outpatient chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory disease. Second-line regimens were classified into three mutually exclusive groups: aggressive, conventional, and palliative. Of the 632 (426 relapsed, 206 refractory) patients in the cohort, 27.8% received aggressive second-line therapy, 39.1% received conventional therapy, and 33.1% received palliative therapy. There were no differences in survival by type of therapy received, either for relapsed or refractory patients, although the patient risk profile differed significantly. However, duration of remission, male gender, and anemia at diagnosis were important predictors in relapsed patients, and male gender, B-symptoms, comorbidity burden, and poverty status were important predictors in refractory patients. Survival in elderly patients receiving second-line therapy remains poor, and the 24-month cost of all care exceeds $97,000. Patients would benefit from improved treatment options.